Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T19:24:20.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Data analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Randall K. Smith
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Keith A. Arnaud
Affiliation:
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Aneta Siemiginowska
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Keith Arnaud
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Randall Smith
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Aneta Siemiginowska
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter describes some of the data-analysis methods used by X-ray astrophysicists. Any data analysis must begin with careful consideration of the physics underlying the emission before starting to progress through a series of software tools and scripts. After confirming that existing observations could (at least potentially) answer the question at hand, the first step is to determine what observations of the desired source(s) exist. Recent observations are often the best starting point, but even old data are better than nothing. Once some usable data are available the analysis, either spectral, imaging, timing, or some combination of the three, can proceed.

Low-resolution spectral analysis

General comments

Most recent and current X-ray observations are performed using detectors which provide imaging combined with relatively low spectral resolution. Early missions such as the Einstein Observatory or ROSAT used X-ray mirrors with good imaging capability combined with microchannel plates or position-sensitive proportional counters that had limited spectral sensitivity, typically REE ∼ 1-10. More recent missions, starting with ASCA, and current missions, such as Chandra and XMM–Newton, use X-ray-sensitive CCDs. These tend to have somewhat higher backgrounds, small pixels, and substantially better spectral resolution, REE ∼ 10-50, than proportional counters. For comparison, the standard “UBVRI” optical filter system is equivalent to R ∼ 4.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×