Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Hands: The Human Body and Clay
- 2 Recycling: The Reuse of Materials and Objects
- 3 Design: The Expression of Ideas and the Construction of User Experience
- 4 Margins: Locations for Creativity
- 5 Resistance: The Reappropriation of Objects, Actions, and Ideas
- 6 Mimesis: The Relationship between Original and Reproduction
- 7 Performance: The Production of Knowledge
- 8 Failure: Creativity and Risk
- Afterword
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Hands: The Human Body and Clay
- 2 Recycling: The Reuse of Materials and Objects
- 3 Design: The Expression of Ideas and the Construction of User Experience
- 4 Margins: Locations for Creativity
- 5 Resistance: The Reappropriation of Objects, Actions, and Ideas
- 6 Mimesis: The Relationship between Original and Reproduction
- 7 Performance: The Production of Knowledge
- 8 Failure: Creativity and Risk
- Afterword
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Clay in the Age of BronzeEssays in the Archaeology of Prehistoric Creativity, pp. 169 - 204Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
2010. Introduction to ‘Forms in the Realms of Matter’, from The Life of Forms in Art by Henri Focillon. In (ed), The Craft Reader. Oxford: Berg, pp. 360–365.Google Scholar
1933 [1978]. On the Mimetic Faculty. In (ed), Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. Trans. . New York: Schocken, pp. 720–722.Google Scholar
1994. What Is Creativity? In (ed), Dimensions of Creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 75–118.Google Scholar
1975. Die Mittlere Bronzezeit Ungarns und ihre sudostlichen Bezielumgen. Budapest: Akadémia Kiadó.Google Scholar
2010. Creative Geographies: Tales from the ‘Margins’. Australian Geographer 41(1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2007. Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. Volume 44 of Association of Social Anthropologists Monographs. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
1968. Beiträge zur Chronologie der mittleren Bronzezeit im Karpatenbecken. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
2013. Trade and Exchange. In and (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the European Bronze Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 370–381.Google Scholar
2006. ‘Resisting Creativity, Creating the New’. A Deleuzian Perspective on Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management 15(2): 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011. Repertoriul Arheologic Al Judetului Maramureș. Bibliotheca Marmatia 3. Baia Mare: Muzeul Judetean De Istorie Și Arheologie Maramureș.Google Scholar
2001. Thought and Production: Insights of the Practitioner. In (ed), Anthropological Perspectives on Technology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
and 2005. The Rise of Bronze Age Society: Travels, Transmissions and Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004. Creative Land. Place and Procreation on the Rai Coast of Papua New Guinea. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
2001. Introduction. In (ed), Locating Cultural Creativity. London: Pluto Press, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
2008. Making Pots and Potters in the Bronze Age Villages of Kiszombor-Új-Élet and Klárafalva-Hajdova in Hungary. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(3): 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1970. Some Notes on the Phenomenology of Making: The Search for the Motivated. Artforum 8(8): 62–66.Google Scholar
2009. The Thinking Hand. Existential and Embodied Wisdom in Architecture. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
1997. Materials, Relationships and Languages: Interview with Giovanni Piazza. Reported in 2005. From the Beginning of the Atelier to Materials as Languages: Conversations with Reggio Emilia. In , , , and (eds), In the Spirit of the Studio: Learning from the Atelier of Reggio Emilia. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 6–15.Google Scholar
2006. Pots, Houses and Metal: Technological Relations at the Bronze Age Tell at Százhalombatta, Hungary. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 25(2): 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011. Human Ontogeny and Material Change at the Bronze Age Tell of Százhalombatta, Hungary. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 21(2): 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, 2000, Afterwords. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18(2): 213–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. Mind, Materiality and History. Explorations in Fijian Ethnography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011. Bronze Age Cemetery at Dunaújváros-Duna-dűlő. Dissertationes Pannonicae Series IV, Volume 1. Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Archaeological Sciences, Budapest.Google Scholar
(ed). 2003. Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millennium. Budapest: Ministry of National Cultural Heritage, Teleki László Foundation.Google Scholar
2011. Sincerity versus Self-Expression: Modern Creative Agency and the Materiality of Semiotic Forms. Cultural Anthropology 26(3): 462–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1976. African Art: Where the Hand Has Ears. Reprinted in (ed), 2010. The Craft Reader. Oxford: Berg, pp. 379–385.
1982. Water and Dreams: An Essay on the Imagination of Matter. Dallas, TX: The Pegasus Foundation.Google Scholar
2005. Prehistoric Figurines: Representation and Corporeality in the Neolithic. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. Smashing Pots: Works of Clay from Africa. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Creativity as Sensual Cosmology: The Case of Bird Iconography in Late Bronze and Early Iron Age Europe. In , , and with , , , , , , , , , and , Creativity in the Bronze Age. Manuscript in preparation.
2006. Materialität, Variabilität und Individualität kommunikativen Handelns in der Vorgeschichte. In , , , , and (eds), Pontos Euxeinos. Beiträge zur Archäologie und Geschichte des Antiken Schwarzmeer- und Balkanraumes. Schr. Zentrum Arch. u. Kulturgesch. Schwarzmeerraum 10. Weissbach: Beier & Beran, pp. 23–34.Google Scholar
2008. ‘Import’, ‘Imitation’ or ‘Communication’? Figurines from the Lower Danube and Mycenae. In and (eds), Import and Imitation in Archaeology. Langenweißbach: Beier & Beran, pp. 105–124.Google Scholar
1987. The Anatomy of Architecture. Ontology and Metaphor in Batammaliba Architectural Expression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2002. Gräberfelder als Spiegel der historischen Entwicklung während der mittleren Bronzezeit in mittleren Donaugebiet. Universitätsforschungen zur Prähistorischen Archäologie 80. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
2012. A New Late Copper Age Wagon Model from the Carpathian Basin. In , , , , and (eds), Archaeological, Cultural and Linguistic Heritage. Festschrift for Erzsébet Jerem in Honour of Her 70th Birthday. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 71–83.Google Scholar
and 2011. A New Early Bronze Age Wagon Model from the Carpathian Basin. World Archaeology 43(4): 538–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1995. The Faerie Smith Meets the Bronze Industry: Magic Versus Science in the Interpretation of Prehistoric Metal-Making. World Archaeology 27(1): 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. Skill amongst the Sherds: Understanding the Role of Skill in the Early to Late Middle Bronze Age in Hungary. In (ed), Breaking the Mould: Challenging the Past through Pottery, Manchester 2006. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1861. Oxford: BAR, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
and 2009. Nondiscursive Knowledge and the Construction of Identity: Potters, Potting and Performance at the Bronze Age Tell of Százhalombatta, Hungary. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19(2): 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2013. Birds Images on Serbian Bronze Age Ceramics. In , , and (eds), Bronze Age Crafts and Craftsmen. Proceedings of the International Colloquium from Târgu Mureș. Târgu Mureș: Editura MEGA, pp. 23–31.Google Scholar
2008 [2010]. Craft versus Design: Moving beyond a Tired Dichotomy. In (ed), The Craft Reader. Oxford: Berg, pp. 321–332.Google Scholar
and 2012. Mudras of India: A Comprehensive Guide to the Hand Gestures of Yoga and Indian Dance. London: Singing Dragon.Google Scholar
1995. Cultura Gârla Mare. In , , and (eds), Comori Ale Epocii Bronzului Din România [Treasures of the Bronze Age]. Bucharest: Ministerul Culturii and Muzeul Național De Istorie A României, pp. 171–181.Google Scholar
1990. Vessels of the Spirit: Pots and People in North Cameroon [Video]. Calgary: University of Calgary.Google Scholar
1961. Necropola Incinerație Din Epoca Bronzului De La Cîrna. Biblioteca De Arheologie IV. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Populare Romîne.Google Scholar
2007. Origins and Revolutions: Human Identity in Earliest Prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. The Bronze Age of Serbia. Beograd: National Museum Beograd, catalogue of the exhibition.Google Scholar
1983. Dubovačko-Žutobrdska Grupa. In (ed), Praistorija Jugoslavenskih Zemalja IV. Bronzano Doba. Sarajevo: Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, Centar za balkanolosoška ispitivanja, pp. 520–535.Google Scholar
, , and 2013. Visions of Dress – Recreating Bronze Age Clothing from the Danubian Region. Textile: The Journal of Cloth and Culture 11(3): 218–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2007. Bronze Age Bird Representations from the Carpathian Basin. Communicationes Archaeologicae Hungariae 2007, pp. 75–110.Google Scholar
2002. ‘The Bone Collector’. Review of Charles LeDray, Sculpture 1989–2002, Institute of Contemporary Art, Philadelphia, May 10–July 14, 2002. Philadelphia City Paper, May 30, 2002 edition.
2012. Words and Things: Reflections on People's Interaction with the Material World. In and (eds), Materiality and Social Practice: Transformative Capacities of Intercultural Encounters. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 4–12.Google Scholar
2000. European Societies in the Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2013. The Language of Craftsmanship. In and (eds), Embodied Knowledge. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 95–105.Google Scholar
, , , , and 2005. Előzetes jelentés az épülő Kőérberek, Tóváros-Lakópark területén folyó régészeti feltárásról [Preliminary report on the archaeological excavation conducted parallel to the construction on the territory of the Kőérberek, Tóváros Residental District]. Aquincumi Füzetek 11: 137–167.Google Scholar
1998. From Complimentary to Obviation: On Dissolving the Boundaries between Social and Biological Anthropology, Archaeology and Psychology. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 123: 21–52.Google Scholar
1997. Die Vogel-Sonnen-Barke: Symbol der mitteleuropäischen Urnenfelderkultur. In Von der Höhlenkunst zur Pyramide: Vorzeit und Altertum. Leipzig:Mannheim, pp. 258–262.Google Scholar
1968. Die Frühbronzezeit in Nordostungarn. Archaeologia Hungarica 45. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
2010. Ein Gräberfeld der Spätbronzezeit von Budapest-Békásmegyer. Institut für Archäologische Wissenschaften der Eötvös Loránd Universität. Edited by and . Budapest: L'Harmattan, Ungarn.Google Scholar
2003. Potters in Transdanubia. In (ed), Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millenium. Budapest: Ministry of National Cultural Heritage, Teleki László Foundation, pp. 150–151.Google Scholar
2007. Contacts along the Danube: A Boat Model from the Early Bronze Age. In , , , and (eds), Prehistory across Borders. Proceedings of the International Conference Bronze and Early Iron Age Interconnections and Contemporary Developments between the Aegean and the Regions of the Balkan Peninsula, Central and Northern Europe. University of Zagreb, 11–14 April 2005. Aegaeum 27. Université de Liège and Universitv of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
2011. The Role of the Danube in the Early and Middle Bronze Age of the Carpathian Basin. In and (eds), Ten Thousand Years along the Middle Danube. Life and Early Communities from Prehistory to History. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 211–239.Google Scholar
2005. Thinking through Material Culture: An Inter-Disciplinary Perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2012. Meaning in Miniature: Semiotic Networks in Material Culture. In , , and (eds), Excavating the Mind: Cross-Sections through Culture, Cognition and Materiality. Arhus: Arhus University Press, pp. 87–109.Google Scholar
2013. Conceptual Knowledge as Technologically Materialized: A Case Study of Pottery Production, Consumption and Community Practice. In and (eds), Embodied Knowledge. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 106–116.Google Scholar
1972a. Askoi, Bird-Shaped Vessels, Bird-Shaped Rattles in Bronze Age Hungary. Folia Archaeologica 23: 7–28.Google Scholar
1972b. Bronzkori harangszoknyás szobrok a Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum gyüjteményében [Bronze Age Bell-Skirted Statuettes in the Collection of the Hungarian National Museum]. Archaeologiai Értesítő 99: 47–52.Google Scholar
1973. Representations of Weapons on Bronze Age Pottery. Folia Archaeologica XXIV: 7–31.Google Scholar
1981. Bronzezeitliche Tradition in der hallstattzeitlichen Kunst Transdanubiens. In and (eds), Die Halstattkultur. Symposium Steyr 1980. Linz: Amt der Oö. Landesregierung, Abt Kultur, pp. 65–78.Google Scholar
, , and 2004 [2006]. Early and Middle Bronze Age Storage Vessel Building Techniques in Hungary. Ősrégészeti Levelek (Prehistoric Newsletter): 85–91.
1985. Karakteristike sahranjivanja na nekropoli bronzanog doba u Korbovu [Burying Characteristics of the Bronze Age Cemetery in Korbovo]. Zbornik Narodnog muzeja XI-1, Beograd.Google Scholar
2003. Glamija: nekropola bronzanog doba u Korbovu [Glamija: Bronze Age Necropolis in Korbovo]. Arheoloske monografije, Band 15. Belgrade: Nationalmuseum Beograd.Google Scholar
and 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
and (eds). 1993. Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
and 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. Walter Benjamin: Traces of Craft. Journal of Design History 11(1): 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1973. Antropomorfne figurine bronzanog doba u Jugoslaviji. Dissertationes et Monographiae. Beograd: Filozofski Fakultet. Savez Arheoloških Društava Jugoslavije.Google Scholar
1982. O porijeklu srednjobrončanodobne antropomorfne plastike u jugoslavenskom Podunavlju. Opuscula Archaeologica 7: 47–61.Google Scholar
and 2012. Creativity in Clay: Bird-Shaped and Bird-Ornamented Ceramic Objects in the Middle and Late Bronze Age in the Middle and Lower Danube Regions. Paper presented at the EAA Conference, Helsinki.
1997. Precision Grips, Hand Morphology, and Tools. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 102: 91–110.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1935 [2006]. Les techniques du corps. In (ed), Marcel Mauss: Techniques, Technology and Civilisation. Trans. . Oxford: Durkheim Press, pp. 77–95. [Previously published in Economy and Society 1973.]Google Scholar
1970. Some Notes on the Phenomenology of Making: The Search for the Motivated. Artforum 8(8): 62–66.Google Scholar
2011. Reprezentări din lut ale piciorului uman în cadrul culturii Žuto-Brdo – Gârla Mare. Sebus 3: 109–134Google Scholar
and 2010. みかんのむかた (Mikan no mukata) [Of Peeled Tangerine]. Tokyo: Shogakukan.
2010. Reconfiguring Anatomy: Ceramics, Cremation and Cosmology in the Late Bronze Age in the Lower Danube. In , , and (eds), Body Parts and Bodies Whole. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 72–89.Google Scholar
2012. Investigating Bronze Age Social Organisation in the Lower Danube Region. The Case of the Žuto Brdo-Gârla Mare Area. Istros XVIII: 13–38.Google Scholar
2009. The Thinking Hand: Existential and Embodied Wisdom in Architecture. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
and 1994. Ordering the World: Perceptions of Architecture, Space and Time. In and (eds), Architecture and Order. Approaches to Social Space. London: Routledge, pp. 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Excavation Campaigns at the Bronze Age Tell Site at Százhalombatta-Földvár. In and (eds), Százhalombatta Archaeological Expedition Annual Report 1. Százhalombatta: Archaeolingua, pp. 13–73.Google Scholar
, , and 1984. Izvestaj o sondaznim iskopavanjima u 1980 godini, Djerdapske sveske II: 111–134.Google Scholar
2005. Vogelmensch und Menschvogel. Bronzezeitliche Vogel-Mensch-Darstellungen im mittleren und unteren Donauraum. In , , , and (eds), Interpretationsraum Bronzezeit. Festschrift Bernhard Hänsel. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, pp. 231–239.Google Scholar
2003. Cultura Žuto Brdo-Gârla Mare. Contribuții la cunoaşterea epocii bronzului la Dunărea Mijlocie și Inferioară. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Nereamia Napocae.Google Scholar
and 1990. Contribution to the Study of the Gârla Mare Anthropomorphic Statuettes. Dacia 34: 53–76.Google Scholar
1985. Studien zu bronzezeitlichen Schmucktrachten im Karpatenbecken. Marburger Studien zur Vor- und Frühgeschichre 6. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
1983. The Secondary Exploitation of Animals in the Old World. World Archaeology, 15(1): 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2012. Thinking through the Body: Essays in Somaesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Kulturne skupine s inkrustiranom keramikom u brončanom dobu sjeveroistočne Hrvatske [Cultural Groups with Encrusted Ceramics in the Bronze Age in North-east Croatia]. Osijek: Muzej Slavonije Osijek.Google Scholar
and 2012. Fluid Movement and Creativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141: 625–629.Google ScholarPubMed
2006. Pots, Houses and Metal: Technological Relations at the Bronze Age Tell at Százhalombatta, Hungary. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 25(2): 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2013. Many Hands Make Light Work: Potting and Embodied Knowledge at the Bronze Age Tell at Százhalombatta, Hungary. In and (eds), Embodied Knowledge. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 117–127.Google Scholar
2003a. Beiträge zu den Vogeldarstellungen der bronzezeitlichen Tell-Kulturen. In and (eds), Morgenrot der Kulturen. Frühe Etappen der Menschheitsgeshichte in Mittel- und Südosteuropa. Festschrift für Nándor Kalicz zum 75. Geburtstag. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 513–523.Google Scholar
2003b. The Florescence of the Middle Bronze Age in the Tisza Region: The Füzesabony Culture. In (ed), Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millenium. Budapest: Ministry of National Cultural Heritage, Teleki László Foundation, pp. 156–157.Google Scholar
2006. Relations of the Cruceni-Belegiš Culture with the Žuto Brdo-Gârla Mare Culture. Analele Banatului S.N. XIV(1): 229–270.Google Scholar
2003. The Expansion of the Hatvan Culture. In (ed), Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millenium. Budapest: Ministry of National Cultural Heritage, Teleki László Foundation, pp. 145–148.Google Scholar
and 1959. Vezető a veszprémi Bakonyi Múzeum régészeti kiállitásához [Guide to the Archaeological Exhibition of the Bakony Museum of Veszprém]. Budapest: Múzeumok Közp. Prop. Irodája.Google Scholar
1977. Praistorijska Karaburma II. Nekropola bronzanog doba. Prehistoric Karaburma II [The Necropolis of the Bronze Age]. Dissertationes et monographiae XIX. Monografije 4. Belgrade: City of Belgrade Museum.Google Scholar
1935. 25 Jahre Urgeschichtsforschung in Ungarn. Berlin: Bericht der Römisch-Germanischen Kommission.Google Scholar
and 2000. Función depuradora de los humedales I: una revisión bibliográfica sobre el papel de los macrófitos. Boletín SEHUMED IV(16): 131–139.Google Scholar
and 1996. Predmeti kultne namene na nalazi tima bronzanog doba na Djerdapu [Cult Objects on Bronze Age Sites in the Iron Gate]. Zbornik Radova Narodnog Muzeja 16(1): 89.Google Scholar
1989. The Context of Adoption of Brass Technology in Northeastern Nigeria and Its Effects on the Elaboration of Culture. In and (eds), What's New? A Closer Look at the Process of Innovation. One World Archaeology 14. London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 225–244.Google Scholar
2012. Archaeology and Apprenticeship: Body Knowledge, Identity, and Communities of Practice. In (ed), Archaeology and Apprenticeship: Body Knowledge, Identity, and Communities of Practice. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
2006. Vogel-Sonnen-Barke. In , , and (eds), Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 552–563.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Creativity and Textile Tools in Middle Bronze Age Százhalombatta-Földvár. In , , and with , , , , , , , , , and , Creativity in the Bronze Age. Manuscript in preparation.
1975. Die Mittlere Bronzezeit Ungarns und Ihre Südöstlichen Beziehungen. Archaeologia Hungarica IL. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
and 2012. Buried, Wasted, Half-Done and Left-Over: In Search of the Artisans among Their ‘Rubbish’. Paper presented at the conference Craft and People: Agents of Skilled Labour in the Archaeological Record. 1–2 November 2012. London: British Museum.
and , 2009. Nondiscursive Knowledge and the Construction of Identity. Potters, Potting and Performance at the Bronze Age Tell of Százhalombatta, Hungary. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19(2): 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 2007. Renewal and Reinvention: The Role of Learning Strategies in the Early to Late Bronze Age of the Carpathian Basin. Unpublished PhD, University of Southampton.
, 2008. Skill amongst the Sherds: Understanding the Role of Skill in the Early to Late Middle Bronze Age in Hungary. In (ed), Breaking the Mould: Challenging the Past through Pottery, Manchester 2006. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1861. Oxford: BAR, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
and 2012. Pots and Agriculture: Anasazi Rural Household Production, Long House Valley, Northern Arizona. In and (eds), Ancient Households of the Americas: Conceptualizing What Households Do. Boulder: University of Colorado, pp. 189–218.Google Scholar
and (eds). 2010. Organizing Bronze Age Societies. The Mediterranean, Central Europe and Scandinavia Compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. From the Beginning of the Atelier to Materials as Languages: Conversations with Reggio Emilia. In , , , and (eds), In the Spirit of the Atudio: Learning from the Atelier of Reggio Emilia. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 6–15.Google Scholar
and 2005. Remida, the Creative Recycling Center in Reggio Emilia: An Interview with Elena Giacopini, Graziella Brighenti, Arturo Bertoldi, and Alba Ferrari. Innovations in Early Education 12(3): 1–13.Google Scholar
and 2012. Finished and Unfinished Objects: Supporting Children's Creativity through Materials. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 51: 721–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. European Societies in the Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2007. Creativity and Cultural Improvisation: An Introduction. In and (eds), Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. Oxford: Berg, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
2006. ‘Resisting Creativity, Creating the New’. A Deleuzian Perspective on Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management 15(2): 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. ‘Fountain’ Most Influential Piece of Modern Art. The Independent 2 December 2004.
2005. Thinking through Material Culture. An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
2008. Geoarchaeological Investigation of Százhalombatta-Földvár Bronze Age Tell Settlement in Hungary. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
1969. A százhalombattai bronzkori telep [The Bronze Age Settlement at Százhalombatta]. Archaeologiai Értesítő 96: 161–169.Google Scholar
2005. Middle Bronze Age Ceramic Finds from Százhalombatta-Földvár, Hungary. In and (eds), Százhalombatta Archaeological Expedition. Report 2. Százhalombatta: Matrica Museum, pp. 9–19.Google Scholar
2007. Technological Choices and Material Meanings in Early and Middle Bronze Age Hungary: Understanding the Active Role of Material Culture through Ceramic Analysis. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1604. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
, , , , and 2007. Archaeometric Examination of Early and Middle Bronze Age Ceramics from Százhalombatta-Földvár, Hungary. Archeometriai Műhely 2: 33–46.Google Scholar
2000. Sustainable Innovation through an Entrepreneurship Lens. Business Strategy and the Environment 9: 304–317.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. Modes of Creativity. In and (eds), Transactions and Creations. Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 151–175.Google Scholar
2001. Introduction. In (ed), Locating Cultural Creativity. London: Pluto Press, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
2012. The Resonance of Gabbroic Clay in Contemporary Ceramic Works. Paper presented at the conference Insight from Innovation: New Light of Archaeological Ceramics. 19–21 October 2012. University of Southampton.
1997. Materials, Relationships and Languages: Interview with Giovanni Piazza. Reported in 2005. From the Beginning of the Atelier to Materials as Languages: Conversations with Reggio Emilia. In , , , and (eds), In the Spirit of the Studio: Learning from the Atelier of Reggio Emilia. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 6–15.Google Scholar
, 2000. Excavation Campaigns at the Bronze Age Site at Százhalambatta-Földvár. In and (eds), Százhalombatta Archaeological Expedition SAX Annual Report 1. Százhalombatta: Archaeolingua, pp. 13–73.Google Scholar
2003. Fortified Centres along the Danube. In (ed), Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millenium. Budapest: Department of Monuments of the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, pp. 151–155.Google Scholar
1984. Pots and Potters: Current Approaches in Ceramic Archaeology. Los Angeles: University of California, Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
2010. The Germ of the Future? Ghetto Biennale: Port‐au‐Prince. Third Text 24(4): 491–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. Pots, Houses and Metal. Technological Relations at the Bronze Age Tell at Százhalombatta, Hungary. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 25(2): 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
with contributions by , , , , , , , , and 2010. Technology and Craft. In and (eds), Organizing Bronze Age Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–217.Google Scholar
2011. Human Ontogeny and Material Change at the Bronze Age Tell of Százhalombatta, Hungary. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 21(2): 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2012. Notes from a Bronze Age Tell: Százhalombatta-Földvár, Hungary. The European Archaeologist 38: 15–16.Google Scholar
, , and Forthcoming. Life on a Bronze Age Tell: The Pottery from Levels 1–7, Százhalombatta, Hungary. SAX Report IV. Százhalombatta: Matrica Museum.
with contributions by , , , , , and 2010. Households. In and (eds), Organizing Bronze Age Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–154.Google Scholar
and (eds). 2003. Gold und Kult der Bronzezeit (exhibition catalogue). Nürnberg: Verlag des Germanischen Nationalmuseums.Google Scholar
and 2008. Were They Used as Tools? An Exploratory Functional Study of Abraded Potsherds from Two Pre-colonial Sites on the Island of Guadeloupe, Northern Lesser Antilles. Caribbean Journal of Science 44(1): 21–35.Google Scholar
1992. Die Bestattungen der Vatya-kultur. In (ed), Bronzezeit in Ungarn. Forschungen in Tell-Siedlungen an Donau und Thiess. Frankfurt am Main: Museum für Vor- un Frühgeschichte, Archaeologisches Museum, pp. 92–95.Google Scholar
2005. Excavation Methods and Some Preliminary Results of the SAX Project. In and (eds), Százhalombatta Archaeological Expedition. Report 2. Százhalombatta: Archaeolingua, pp. 65–77.Google Scholar
2011. Bronze Age Cemetery at Dunaújváros-Duna-dűlő. Dissertationes Pannonicae Series IV, Volume 1. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Archaeological Sciences.Google Scholar
and 2004. Százhalombatta – Földvár. In (ed), Archaeological Investigations in Hungary 2003. Budapest: Kulturális Örökségvédelmi Hivatal, pp. 290–293.Google Scholar
1975. Die Mittlere Bronzezeit Ungarns und Ihre Südöstlichen Beziehungen. Archaeologia Hungarica IL. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
1968. Outline of a sociological Theory of Art Perception. International Social Science Journal 20(Winter): 589–612.Google Scholar
, 2008. Skill amongst the Sherds: Understanding the Role of Skill in the Early to Late Middle Bronze Age in Hungary. In (ed), Breaking the Mould: Challenging the Past through Pottery, Manchester 2006. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1861. Oxford: BAR, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
2008 [2010]. Craft versus Design: Moving beyond a Tired Dichotomy. In (ed), The Craft Reader. Oxford: Berg, pp. 321–332.Google Scholar
2005. Cox Review of Creativity in Business: Building on the UK's Strengths. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
2007. Life Histories of Pots and Potters: Situating the Individual in Archaeology. American Antiquity 72: 677–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1982–1983. A nagyrévi kultúra leletei a Közép-Tiszavidékről. SzMMÉ 1982–83: 33–65.
2003. Tiszaug-Kéménytetõ: A Bronze Age Settlement in the Tiszazug. In (ed), Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millennium. Budapest: Ministry of National Cultural Heritage, pp. 143–144.Google Scholar
1971. Mokrin. The Early Bronze Age Necropolis. Beograd: Smithsonian Institution / The Archaeological Society of Yugoslavia.Google Scholar
, , and 2004. Some New 14 C Data to the Bronze Age in Slovakia. Geochronometria 23: 79–91.Google Scholar
1992. Archaeological Research on Style. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 517–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1950. The Thing. Reprinted in (ed). 2010. The Craft Reader. Oxford and New York: Berg, pp. 404–408.
1998. Ships on Bronzes. A Study in Bronze Age Religion and Iconography. Copenhagen: National Museum of Denmark.Google Scholar
2004. Bronzealderens ikonografiske motiver og deres fremkomst i en fromativ fase. In and (eds), Prehistoric Pictures as Archaeological Source. Gotarc Serie C. Arkeologiska Skrifter 50. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet, pp. 85–119.Google Scholar
2005. Bronze Age Tripartite Cosmologies. Prähistorische Zeitschrift 80(2): 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. Thinking through Material Culture. An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
and 2005. The Rise of Bronze Age Society. Travels, Transmissions and Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012. The Sound of Fire, Smell of Copper, Feel of Bronze, and Colours of the Cast: Sensory Aspects of Metalworking Technology. In and (eds), Embodied Knowledge. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 137–150.Google Scholar
1998. Walter Benjamin: Traces of Craft. Journal of Design History 11(1): 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997 [2004]. Foreword. In (ed), On Creativity. Routledge Classics Edition. Oxford: Routledge, pp. xv–xxxiii.Google Scholar
1997. Invention by Design. How Engineers Get from Thought to Thing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2003. Fortified Cenres along the Danube. In (ed), Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millennium. Budapest: Ministry of National Cultural Heritage, pp. 151–155.Google Scholar
and 2004. Százhalombatta Története A Bronzkortól Napjainkig. A Százhalombattai ‘Matrica’ Múzeum Állandó Kiállításának Katalógusa. Százhalombatta: Matrica Múzeum.Google Scholar
and 2013. Sheep Wool in Bronze Age and Iron Age Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 40: 1224–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2009. The Staircase: A Technical Masterpiece. In , , , and (eds), Kingdom of Salt. 7000 Years of Hallstatt. Veröffentlichungen der Prähistorischen Abteilung (VPA) 3. Vienna: The Natural History Museum of Vienna, pp. 61–63.Google Scholar
2007. A Theory of Craft. Function and Aesthetic Expression. Durham: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
1984. Szimbolikus ábrázolások korobronzkori edényeken (Symbolische darstellungen an frübronzezeitlichen Gefässen). Archaeológiai Értesítõ 111: 3–28.Google Scholar
2011. Human Ontogeny and Material Change at the Bronze Age Tell of Százhalombatta, Hungary. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 21: 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2013. Cosmologies in Clay: Swedish Helmet Bowls in the Middle Bronze Age of the Carpathian Basin. In and (eds), Counterpoint: Essays in Archaeology and Heritage Studies in Honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen. Oxford: Archaeopress. pp. 361–365.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Pots as Stories. In , , and with , , , , , , , , , and , Creativity in the Bronze Age. Manuscript in preparation.
and 2012. Many Hands Make Light Work: Embodied Knowledge at the Bronze Age Tell at Százhalombatta, Hungary. In and (eds), Embodied Knowledge. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 117–127.Google Scholar
and 2002. Becoming Cultural: Society and the Incorporation of Bronze. In and (eds), Metals and Society: Papers from a Session Held at the European Association of Archaeologists Sixth Annual Meeting in Lisbon 2000. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1061. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 117–121.Google Scholar
and Forthcoming. The Making of a New Material – From Copper to Bronze. In , , and with , , , , , , , , , and , Creativity in the Bronze Age. Manuscript in preparation.
2007. Echo Objects. The Cognitive Work of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1972. The Mokrin Necropolis and Its Position in the Development of the Early Bronze Age in Voivodina. In (ed), Mokrin II. The Early Bronze Age Necropolis. Kikinda: Narodni Museum, pp. 9–28.Google Scholar
2009. Nagyrév Symbolism Revisited: Three Decorated Vessels from Százhalombatta and Dunaújváros. Tisicum: A Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok Megyei Múzeumok Évkönyve XIX (2009): 309–318.
2011. Bronze Age Cemetery at Dunaújváros-Duna-dűlő. Dissertationes Pannonicae Series IV, Volume 1. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Archaeological Sciences.Google Scholar
2012. How Ancient Europeans Saw the World: Vision, Patterns, and the Shaping of the Mind in Prehistoric Times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1957. Asilomar Conference Proceedings. A Ceramist Speaks on Design. Reprinted in (ed). 2010. The Craft Reader. Oxford and New York: Berg, pp. 569–574.
2001. Football and Polo: Tradition and Creolization in the Making of Modern Argentina. In (ed), Locating Cultural Creativity. London: Pluto Press, pp. 93–105.Google Scholar
1997. New Perspectives on the Bell Beaker Culture. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 16(3): 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2005. Skating with Horses: Continuity and Parallelism in Prehistoric Hungary. Revue de Paléobiologie 10: 317–326.Google Scholar
2010. Guest Editorial – Creative Geographies: Tales from the ‘Margins’. Australian Geographer 41(1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988. Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity. In (ed), The Nature of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–339.Google Scholar
2008. Bell Beakers at Budakalász. In (ed), Perspectives of the Past. Excavations of the Last Decade in Pest County. Szentendre: Pest Megyei Múzeumok Igazgatósága.Google Scholar
2011. When Beakers Met Bell Beakers. An Analysis of Dental Remains. British Archaeological Reports International Series 2292. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
and 1990. Creative Marginality: Innovation at the Intersections of Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
1999. Marginality. In and (eds), Encyclopedia of Creativity. Vol. 2, I–Z. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 179–184.Google Scholar
1992. Die Gräberfelder der Glockenbecherkultur in Mähren I. Katalog der Funde. Brno: Petr Dvořák.Google Scholar
1992. A korabronzkori Harangedény kultúra telepe és temetője Szigetszentmiklós határában [The Settlement and Cemetery of the Bell Beaker Culture in the District of Szigetszentmiklós]. In and (eds), Régészeti kutatások az M0 autópálya nyomvonalán I. Archäologische Forschungen auf der Strasse der Autobahn M0. I. BTM Műhely 5: 83–201.Google Scholar
2002. New Data on the Late Copper Age and Early Bronze Age Settlement History of Budapest – Csepel Island. Budapest Régiségei XXXVI: 115–129.Google Scholar
2003. Characteristic Elements of the Settlement Structure in the Early Bronze Age Settlement at Budapest-Albertfalva. In (ed), Bronzezeitliche Kulturerscheinungen im Karpatischen Raum. Die Beziehungen zu den benachbarten Gebieten. Bibliotheca Marmatia 2(2003): 151–157.Google Scholar
2005. Kora Bronzkori Ház- És Településrekonstrukció A Harangedény-Csepel-Csoport Budapest (XI. Kerület)-Albertfalva LelőHelyén [Reconstruction of an Early Bronze Age House and Settlement at the Budapest Albertfalva Site of the Bell Beaker–Csepel Group]. Ősrégészeti Levelek 7: 128–134.Google Scholar
2012. Early Bronze Age Headdress. Markers of the Social Status in the Bell Beaker–Csepel Group. Archaeologiai Értesítő 137: 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2013. Recent Data on the Settlement History and Contact System of the Bell Beaker–Csepel Group. In and (eds), with , , and , Moments in Time. Papers Presented to Pál Raczky on His 60th Birthday. Ősrégészeti Társaság / Prehistoric Society Eötvös Loránd University. Budapest: L'Harmattan, pp. 693–705.Google Scholar
and 2006. Symbolism and Traditions in the Society of Bell Beaker–Csepel Group [A szimbolizmus és a tradíciók szerepe a Harangedény–Csepel-csoport társadalmában]. Archaeologiai Értesítő 131: 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2008. The Roles of the Environmental and Cultural Factors in the Everyday Life of Bell Beaker–Csepel Group. Millenni. Studi di Archeologia Preistorica 6: 235–256.Google Scholar
1992. Uncommon Ground: Archaeology and Early African America, 1650–1800. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
, and 2008. Bracers or Bracelets? About the Functionality and Meaning of Bell Beaker Wrist-Guards. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 74: 109–140.Google Scholar
2010. Guest Editorial – Creative Geographies: Tales from the ‘Margins’. Australian Geographer 41(1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2004. Cultural Industry Production in Remote Places: Indigenous Popular Music in Australia. In and (eds), The Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 243–258.Google Scholar
1968. Kultura zvoncovitých pohárů v Čechách, Archeologické Studijní Materiály 5, Praha: n.p.Google Scholar
1992. Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
1980. The Beaker Folk: Copper Age Archaeology in Western Europe. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
1998, Die Glockenbecherkultur in Süddeutschland, Zum Stand der Forschung einer Regionalprovinz entlang der Donau. In and (eds), Some New Approaches to the Bell Beaker ‘Phenomenon’. Lost Paradise …? Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the ‘Association Archéologie et Gobelets’, Feldberg (Germany), 18–20 April 1997. British Archaeological Reports International Series 690, Oxford, pp. 87–106.
. 2005. The Eastern Periphery of the Bell Beaker Phenomenon and Its Relation with the Aegean Early Bronze Age. In , , , (eds), Between the Aegean and Baltic Seas. Prehistory across Borders. Proceedings of the International Conference ‘Bronze and Iron Age Interconnections and Contemporary Developments between the Aegean and the Regions of the Balkan Peninsula, Central and Northern Europe’. 11–14 April 2005. University of Zagreb, Aegaeum 27, 91–104.Google Scholar
, and 2004. Siedlungen der Glockenbecherkultur in Süddeutschland und Mitteleuropa. Arbeiten zur Archäologie Süddeutschlands. Büchenbach: Dr Faustus Verlag.Google Scholar
2004. Boundaries of Creation: The Work of Credibility in Science and Ceremony. In and (eds), Transactions and Creations. Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 176–192.Google Scholar
2005. Bucsu, Hosszú Aszú-dűlő. In Régészeti Kutatások Magyarországon 2004 – Archaelogical Investigations in Hungary 2004, Budapest: Kulturális Örökségvédelmi Hivatal, p. 179.Google Scholar
2007. Introduction. Part I. Modes of Creativity in Life and Art. In and (eds), Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. Oxford: Berg, pp. 45–54.Google Scholar
2013. Islam in Iberia or Iberian Islam. Bioarchaeology and the Analysis of Emerging of Islamic Identity in Early Medieval Spain. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southampton.
1981. Möglichkeiten zur feineren Gliederung der Nagyrév-kultur in Budapest. In and (eds), Die Frühbronzezeit im Karpatenbecken und in den Nachbargebieten. Internationales Symposium 1977 Budapest–Velem. Budapest: Mitteilungen des Archäologischen Instituts der Ungarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Beiheft 2, pp. 81–87.Google Scholar
1984. Komplex der Nagyrév-Kultur. In (ed), Kulturen der Frühbronzezeit des Karpatenbeckens und Nordbalkans. Beograd: Balkanološki Institut SANU, pp. 133–190.Google Scholar
1997. Kora Bronzkori Temetkezesek A Csepel-Sziget keleti partján (Frühbronzezeitliche Bestattungen Am Östlichen Ufer Der Csepel-Insel Bei Budapest)Budapest Régiségei 31: 177–197.Google Scholar
1998/1997. A Somogyvár-Vinkovci kultúra és a Harangedény-Csepel-csoport Budapest kora bronzkorában [Die Somogyvár-Vinkovci-Kultur und die Glockenbecher in der Frühbronzezeit von Budapest]. Savaria 24(1998/1999): 83–114.Google Scholar
and 1998/2000. A harangedények szerepe a Budapest környéki kora bronzkor társadalmi viszonyainak megjelenítésében [The Role of Bell Beakers in Reflecting Social Relations in the Early Bronze Age of Budapest]. Archaeologiai Értesítő 125: 45–78.Google Scholar
and 1999. A Somogyvár-Vinkovci- Kultur und die Glockenbecher in der Frühbronzezeit von Budapest. Savaria 24(3): 83–115.Google Scholar
2002. Clusters of Creativity: Enduring Lessons on Innovation and Entrepreneurship from Silicon Valley and Europe's Silicon Fen. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
2008. Prilog Poznavanju rasprostranjenosti zvonastih pehara [A Contribution to the Familiar Distribution of Bell Beakers]. Rad muzeja Vojvodine 50: 33–59.Google Scholar
2003. The Early Bronze Age. In (ed), Hungarian Archaeology at the Turn of the Millenium. Budapest: Ministry of National Cultural Heritage, Teleki László Foundation, pp. 141–142.Google Scholar
2009. The Beginnings of the Bronze Age in the Carpathian Basin: The Makó-Kosihy-Čaka and the Somogyvár-Vinkovci Cultures in Hungary. Budapest: Archeolingua.Google Scholar
2004. Modes of Creativity. In and (eds), Transactions and Creations. Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 151–175.Google Scholar
2001. Introduction. In (ed), Locating Cultural Creativity. London: Pluto Press, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
1998. Scholarly Book Reviewing in the Social Sciences and Humanities: The Flow of Ideas within and among Disciplines. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
1991. The Earliest Bronze Age in the Carpathian Basin. Bradford: Department of Archaeological Sciences.Google Scholar
and 2012. The Bell Beaker Phenomenon. Meanings of Regional Transmission. In and (eds), Background to Beakers. Inquiries into Regional Cultural Backgrounds of the Bell Beaker Complex. Leiden: Sidestone Press, pp. 177–190.Google Scholar
2009. Prehistoric Cosmologies – A Methodological Framework for an Attempt to Reconstruct Bronze Age Cosmologic Ideas in the Carpathian Basin. In , , , and (eds), Cosmology Across Cultures. ASP Conference Series vol. 409, pp. 457–463.Google Scholar
2008. An Early Bronze Age Cemetery at Szigetszentmiklós. In (ed), Perspectives of the Past. Excavations of the Last Decade in Pest County. Szentendre: Pest Megyei Múzeumok Igazgatósága, pp. 34–35.Google Scholar
2013. Preliminary Report on the Excavation of the Bell Beaker Cemetery and Settlement at Szigetszentmiklós. Hungary: n.p.
and 2003. The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective. The Academy of Management Review 28(1): 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Constructing the Bodies of Ill Children in the Intensive Care Unit. In (ed), The Body, Childhood and Society. London: Macmillan Press, pp. 172–194.Google Scholar
2008. Contacts between Greece and Pannonia in the Early Iron Age with Special Concern to the Area of Thessalonica. In and (eds), Import and Imitation in Archaeology. Langenweißbach: Beier & Beran, pp. 187–212.Google Scholar
1999. The Centrality of Margins: Art, Gender, and African American Creativity. In , , and (eds), The African Diaspora: African Origins and New World Identities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 204–226.Google Scholar
, , , and 2004. Strontium Isotopes and Prehistoric Human Migration: The Bell Beaker Period in Central Europe. European Journal of Archaeology 7(April): 9–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1992. A Neutron Activation Study of Bell Beakers and Associated Pottery from Czechoslovakia and Hungary. Památky archeologické 83: 197–211.Google Scholar
, 2001. Symbol before Concept: Material Engagement and the Early Development of Society. In (ed), Archaeological Theory TodayCambridge: Polity Press, pp. 122–140.Google Scholar
1973. A harangedények népe Budapesten. Emlékek Budapest múltjából [Die Glockenbecher-Kultur in Budapest]. Emlékek Budapest múltjából 19. Budapest: Budapesti Történeti Múzeum.Google Scholar
1975. A tököli korabronzkori temetők [Frühbronzezeitliche Gräberfelder von Tököl]. Archaeologiai Értesítő 102: 187–203.Google Scholar
1976. Die Probleme der Glockenbecherkultur in Ungarn. In and (eds), Glockenbecher-Symposion. Oberried-Freiburg 1974. Bossum/Haarlem: Fibula – Van Dishoeck, pp. 183–215.Google Scholar
1999. The Cultural Economy: Geography and the Creative Field. Media, Culture and Society 21: 807–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. Engendering Context. Context as Gendered Practice in the Early Bronze Age of the Upper Thames Valley, UK.Journal of European Archaeology 5: 191 – 211.Google Scholar
2006. The Body as Material Culture. A Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2012. Art Ambassador: I Do Not Speak French. Performance Lecture. 3 November 2012. Geneva: Piano Nobile, Festival of new performance.Google Scholar
2010. Bronze Age Bodiness – Maps and Coordinates. , , and (eds), Body Parts and Bodies Whole: Changing Relations and Meanings. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 54–63.Google Scholar
and 2008. Landscapes of the Body: Burials of the Middle Bronze Age in Hungary. European Journal of Archaeology 11(1): 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. Cutting the Network. Journal of the Royal Anthropolpgical Institute n.s. 2: 517–535.Google Scholar
1991. Reading the Body: Beaker Funerary Practice in Britain, in Sacred and Profane. , , , (eds), Proceedings of a Conference on Archaeology, Ritual and Religion, Monograph 32, Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology, pp. 33–42.Google Scholar
1998. The Bell Beaker Period in North-West Bohemia. In and (eds), Some New Approaches to the Bell Beaker ‘Phenomenon’. Lost Paradise …? Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the ‘Association Archéologie et Gobelets’, Feldberg (Germany), 18th–20th April 1997. British Archaeological Reports, International Series 690. Oxford: J. and E. Hedges, pp. 107–119.Google Scholar
2002. Žárové pohřby obdobi zvoncovitých pohárů z Lovosic [The Bell Beaker Cremation Burials from Lovosice]. In and (eds), Sbornik Drahomíru Kouteckému - Festschrift für Drahomir Koutecký. Most: Ústav archeologické památkové péče severozápadních Čech, pp. 265–270.Google Scholar
2012. Periferie fenoménu zvoncovitých Pohárů [Periphery of the Bell Beaker Phenomenon]. Archeologie ve středních Čechách 16: 183–193, fototAb. 1.Google Scholar
2006. Le phénomène campaniforme dans l'Europe du 3ème millénaire avant notre ère. Synthèse et nouvelles perspectives. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1470. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
2007. What Linked the Bell Beakers in Third Millennium BC Europe?Antiquity 81: 343–351.Google Scholar
2007. Culture and Change in Central European Prehistory 6th–1st Millennium BC. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
2004. ‘Only Angels Can Do without Skin’: On Reproductive Technology's Hybrids and the Politics of Body Boundaries. Body and Society 10(2): 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. Contact: Indo-Christian Art. Catalogue. In Aztecs. Royal Academy of Arts. London: Thames and Hudson, pp. 343–344, 481–484.Google Scholar
2011. Sincerity versus Self-Expression: Modern Creative Agency and the Materiality of Semiotic Forms. Cultural Anthropology 26(3): 462–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. A harang alakú edények népének embertani leletei csepel szigetről [Anthropological finds of the Bell Beaker Culture from the Csepel Island]. Anthropologiai Közlemények 47: 11–15.Google Scholar
1965. The Spectacle Fibulae of Southern Europe. American Journal of Archaeology 69(1): 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981. Grobovi kasnog brončanog I staijeg željeznog doba iz okolice Karlovaca. Vjesnik Arheoloskog muzeja u Zagrebu XIV: 11–23.Google Scholar
1967. The Death of the Author. Aspen 5+6 (Fall/Winter). Available at ww.ubu.com/aspen/aspen5and6/index.html
1982. Ein Gräberfeld der jüngeren Bronze- und Eisenzeit bei Vollmarshausen, Kr. Kassel. Kasseler Beiträge zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte 5. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar
2011. The Fastest Way to the Big Sea. A Contribution to the Knowledge about the Influence of the UFC on the Territory of the Northern Adriatic. In and (eds), Beiträge zur Mittel- und Spätbronzezeit sowie zur Urnenfelderzeit am Rande der Südostalpen. Rahden/Westf.: Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH, pp. 51–62.Google Scholar
1898. Groblje sa urnama u Krupačama kod Krašića u Hrvatskoj, Vjesnik Hrvatskoga Arheoloskoga Drustva, n.s. III: 137–143.Google Scholar
2010. New Research on the Urnfield Period of Eastern Slovenia. A Case Study of Rogoza Near Maribor. Arheološki vestnik 61: 7–119.Google Scholar
2011. Creativity in the Margins: Identity and Locality in Ireland's Fashion Journey. Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body & Culture 15(2): 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2011. Rescue Excavations of AS 6 Gornji Vukojevac on the Zagreb – Sisak Motorway Route, Section Velika Gorica South – Lekenik (Ostalo). Annales Instituti Archaeologici VII(1): 61–64.Google Scholar
1992. Cultural Studies and the Culture of Everyday life. In , , and (eds), Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 154–173.Google Scholar
1999. Reconceptualizing Resistance in the Historical Archaeology of the British Isles: An Editorial. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
2002. Noževi culture polja sa žarama iz Hrvatske [Urnfield Culture Knives in Croatia]. Prilozi Instituta za arheologiju u Zagrebu 19: 213–220.Google Scholar
1909. Staro groblje u Velikoj Gorici. Vjesnik Hrvatskoga Arheoloskoga Drustva, n.s. X: 120–134.Google Scholar
1924. Prethistorijske žare iz Velike Gorice kraj Zagreba. In and (eds), Bulićev zbornik. Naučni prilozi posvećeni Franu Buliću prigodom LXXV. Godišnjice njegova života od učenika i prijatelja. Zagreb/Split: Strena Buliciana, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
2010. Ein Graberfeld der Spätbronzezeit von Budapest-Békásmegyer. Budapest: Institut für Archäologische Wissenschaften der Eötvös Loránd Universität and L'Harmattan, Ungarn.Google Scholar
2000. Prijelaz iz starije u mlađu kulturu polja sa žarama u sjevernoj Hrvatskoj. PhD thesis, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Zagreb.
2009. The Urnfield Culture in Continental Croatia. British Archaeological Reports International Series 2036. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
2010. Sljepoočničarke i struktura grobnih priloga na groblju u Velikoj Gorici [Temple Rings and the Structure of Grave Goods Found in the Velika Gorica Graveyard]. Prilozi Instituta za arheologiju u Zagrebu 27: 83–94.Google Scholar
2011. The End of the Middle Bronze Age and the Beginning of the Urnfield Culture in Central Croatia. In and (eds), Beiträge zur Mittel- und Spätbronzezeit sowie zur Urnenfelderzeit am Rande der Südostalpen. Rahden/Westf.: Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH, pp. 11–36.Google Scholar
2013. The Velika Gorica Cemetery and Related Sites in Continental Croatia. In and (eds), Brandbestattungen von der mittleren Donau bis zur Ägäis zwischen 1300 und 750 v. Chr. Akten des internationalen Symposiums an der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, 11.-12. Februar 2010. [Cremation Burials in the Region between the Middle Danube and the Aegean, 1300–750 BC. Proceedings of the International Symposium Held at the Austrian Academy of Sciences at Vienna, 11–12 February 2010]. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp. 119–133.Google Scholar
1990. Popular Taste and Erudite Repertoire: The Place and Space of Television in Brasil. Cultural Studies 4(1): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1988. Class Interpretations of a Soap Opera Narrative: The Case of the Brazilian Novella ‘Summer Sun’. Theory, Culture and Society 5: 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. The Archaeology of Liberty in an American Capital. Excavations in Annapolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1885. Prvo otkriće predhistoričkih grobja od žara u Hrvatskoj. Vjesnik Hrvatskoga Arheoloskoga Drustva VII(1): 65–72.Google Scholar
2009. Grobovi uglednica mlađe faze culture polja sa žaramau sjevernoj Hrvatskoj. Prilog poznavanju ženske nošnje kasnog brončanog doba na prostoru južne Panonije. Vjesnik Arheoloskog muzeja u Zagrebu, 3.s., XLII: 157–182.Google Scholar
2003. The Book of the Cailleach: Stories of the Wise-Woman Healer. Cork: Cork University Press.Google Scholar
2012. The Spectacle Fibulae. An Investigation into Late Bronze and Early Iron Age Female Costume between the Baltic and the Mediterranean. Rahden/Westf: Marburger Studien zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte.Google Scholar
2003. Novi nalazi fibula u obliku violinskoga gudala u Hrvatskom zagorju Prilog poznavanju razdoblja kulture polja sa žarama u sjeverozapadnoj Hrvatskoj [Neue Funde von Violinbogenfibeln in Hrvatsko Zagorje Beitrag zu Erkenntnissen zur älteren Urnenfelderkultur in Nordkroatien]. Prilozi Instituta za arheologiju u Zagrebu 20: 47–56.Google Scholar
2012. Inhumation and Cremation: How Burial Practices Are Linked to Beliefs. In and (eds), Embodied Knowledge. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
and 2008. From Substantial Bodies to the Substance of Bodies: Analysis of the Transition from Inhumation to Cremation during the Middle Bronze Age in Europe. In and (eds), Past Bodies. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 59–68.Google Scholar
and 2009. Landscapes of the Body: Burials of the Middle Bronze Age in Hungary. European Journal of Archaeology 11(1): 49–74.Google Scholar
1957b. Tombes plates à urne à Dobova en Slovénie et à Velika Gorica en Croatie. Inventaria Archaeologica Corpus des Ensembles Archéologiques, Jugoslavija, fascicule. I: Y1–Y10. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt Verlag.Google Scholar
and 2001. Tolmin, prazgodovinsko grobišče I. Katalog in monografije 34. Ljubljana: Narodni Muzej.Google Scholar
and 2002. Tolmin, prazgodovinsko grobišče II. Razprave, Katalog in monografije 35. Ljubljana: Narodni Muzej.Google Scholar
1999. An Outline of the Urnfield Culture Period in Slovenia. Arheološki vestnik 50: 97–143.Google Scholar
2011. Bronze Age Cemetery at Dunaújváros – Duna-dűlő. Dissertationes Pannonicae ex Instituto Archaeologico Universitatis de Rolando Eötvös nominatae Budapestinensis provenientes Series IV Volumen 1. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Archaeological Sciences.Google Scholar
1973. Kultura poljia sa žarama u sjevernoj Hrvatskoj. Zadar: Radovi Filozofskog Fakulteta.
1983. Kultura polja sa žarama sa svojim grupama. In , , , , , , (eds), Praistorija Jugoslavenskih Zemalja IV Bronzano Doba. Sarajevo: Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine. Centar za balkanološka ispitivanja, pp. 547–646.Google Scholar
1996. Prapovijesno naselje na Kosovcu kod Bregane (Samobor). Opuscula Archaeologica Radovi Arheološkog zavoda 20:179–184.Google Scholar
2000. Creating Freedom: Material Culture and African-American Identity at Oakley Plantation, Louisiana, 1845–1950. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
1988. Upscaling Downtown: Stalled Gentrification in Washington, DC. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
1996. Pretpovijesna naselja I nekropola vukovarske Lijeve bare. (ed), Vukovar – Lijeva Bara. Povijest jednog arheološkog nalazišta (tragovi, istraživanja, znamenja) [The History of an Archaeological Site (relics, research, renown)] (exhibition catalogue). Zagreb: The Archaeological Museum in Zagreb, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
1988. Simulacra and Simulations. In (ed), Selected Writings. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 166–184.Google Scholar
1933 [1978]. ‘On the Mimetic Faculty’. Trans. . In (ed), Reflections: Essays Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. New York: Schocken, pp. 720–722.Google Scholar
1975. Die Mittlere Bronzezeit Ungarns und ihre sudostlichen Bezielumgen. Budapest: Akadémia Kiadó.Google Scholar
2006. Danish Razors and Swedish Rocks: Cosmology and the Bronze Age Landscape. Antiquity 80(308): 372–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007. Renewal and Reinvention: The Role of Learning Strategies in the Early to Late Middle Bronze Age of the Carpathian Basin. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Southampton University.
2010. Mimesis and Simulation: Illusory Effects in Music and Film. This Century's Review Issue 01/06. Available at http://history.thiscenturysreview.com/issue0106.html.
2007. Life Histories of Pots and Potters: Situating the Individual in Archaeology. American Antiquity 72: 677–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 2003. Naseobinski nalazi kasnog bakrenodobnog i mlađeg željeznodobnog sloja u terenskom dnevniku s iskopavanja nalazišta Vukovar-Lijeva bara (1951–1953) [Settlement Finds from the Late Eneolithic and Late Iron Age Strata in the Field Diary of the Excavations at Vukovar-Lijeva Bara (1951–1953)]. Opuscula Archaeologica 27: 351–365.Google Scholar
2009. Ranosrednjovjekono groblje bjelobrdske kulture: Vukovar – Lijeva Bara (X-XI. Stoljeće) [An Early Medieval Cemetery of the Bijelo Brdo Culture: Vukovar Lijeva Bara (10th–11th Centuries)]. Zagreb: Arheološki muzej u Zagrebu.Google Scholar
2005. The Mimetic Bond. Benjamin and the Question of Technology. In (ed), Walter Benjamin and Art. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 108–120.Google Scholar
1989. Ricoeur's Theory of Mimesis: Implications for Literature and Theology. Literature and Theology 3(3): 308–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed). 2007. One Hundred Croatian Archaeological Sites. Zagreb: Leksikografski Zavod Miroslav Krleža.Google Scholar
(ed). 1967. Mimesis. In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 5 & 6. New York: Macmillian, p. 335.Google Scholar
2006. Walter Benjamins Archäologie der Moderne: Kulturwissenschaft um 1930. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
2013. Original Copies. Seriality, Similarity and the Simulacrum in the Early Bronze Age. Danish Journal of Archaeology 1(1): 45–61.Google Scholar
1899. Die Traumdeutung [The Interpretation of Dreams]. Leipzig and Vienna: Franz Deuticke.Google Scholar
2003. ‘The Magical Virtue of These Sharp Things’: Colonialism, Mimesis and Knapped Bottle Glass Artefacts in Australia. Journal of Material Culture 8(3): 311–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. The Narrative and Rhetoric of Material Culture Sequences. World Archaeology 25(2): 268–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Rock Art and Mimesis in Neolithic and Bronze Age Scotland. In and (eds), Set in Stone: New Approaches to Neolithic Monuments in Scotland. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 107–117.Google Scholar
2009. The Urnfield Culture in Continental Croatia. British Archaeological Reports International Series 2036. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
1998. Ships on Bronzes. A Study in Bronze Age Religion and Iconography. Copenhagen: National Museum of Denmark.Google Scholar
2004. Bronzealderens ikonografiske motiver og deres fremkomst i en fromativ fase. In and (eds), Prehistoric Pictures as Archaeological Source. Gotarc Serie C. Arkeologiska Skrifter 50. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet, pp. 85–119.Google Scholar
2005. Bronze Age Tripartite Cosmologies. Prähistorische Zeitschrift 80(2): 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed). 1998. Mimesis. In The Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 233.Google Scholar
1999. Towards an Archaeology of Mimesis and Rain-Making in Namibian Rock Art. In (ed), The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape. Shaping Your Landscape. London: Routledge, pp. 337–358.Google Scholar
2002. Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object. Journal of Material Culture 7(1): 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2005. The Rise of Bronze Age Society. Travels, Transmissions and Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002. Der ‘Thrako-Kimmerische’ Formenkreis aus der Sicht der Urnenfelder- und Hallstattzeit im südöstlichen Pannonien. Rahden/Westf: Verlag Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
2005. Mastering Matters: Magical Sense and Apotropaic Figurine Worlds of Neo-Assyria. In (ed), Archaeologies of Materiality. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 46–70.Google Scholar
2010. Mimesis and Illusion in Nonnus: Deceit, Distrust, and the Search for Meaning. Helios 37(1): 81–106.Google Scholar
2008. Contacts between Greece and Pannonia in the Early Iron Age with Special Concern to the Area of Thessalonica. In and (eds), Import and Imitation in Archaeology. Langenweissbach: Beier & Beran, pp. 187–212.Google Scholar
and 2002. Prilog poznavanju naseljenosti Vinkovaca i okolice u starijem željeznom dobu. [A Contribution to Understanding Continuous Habitation of Vinkovci and Its Surroundings in the Early Iron Age]. Prilozi Instituta za arheologiju u Zagrebu 19: 79–100.Google Scholar
2009. Object Lessons: Metaphors of Agency in Walter Benjamin's ‘The Task of the Translator’ and Patrick Chamoiseau's Solibo Magnifique. French Literature Series 36(1): 147–159.Google Scholar
1975. (Trans. 1977) The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language. Trans. with and .Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
2004. Masters of Deception. Escher, Dalí and the Artists of Optical Illusion. New York: Sterling Publishing.Google Scholar
2013. Cosmologies in Clay: Swedish Helmet Bowls in the Middle Bronze Age of the Carpathian Basin. In and (eds), Counterpoint: Essays in Archaeology and Heritage Studies in Honour of Professor Kristian Kristiansen. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 361–365.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Pots as Stories. In , , and with , , , , , , , , , and , Creativity in the Bronze Age. Manuscript in preparation.
and 2012. Many Hands Make Light Work: Embodied Knowledge at the Bronze Age Tell at Százhalombatta, Hungary. In and (eds), Embodied Knowledge. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 117–127.Google Scholar
and 2008. The Authenticity of Ambiguity: Writing the Dis/interest Project. In and (eds), Biographies and Space. London: Routledge, pp. 168–193.Google Scholar
2007. Echo Objects. The Cognitive Work of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
, , and 2011. Zaštitna arheološka istraživanja na Starom gradu Dubovcu 2009–2010 [Archaeological Rescue Excavations at Stari Grad Dubovac 2009–2010]. Annales Instituti Archaeologici / Godišnjak Instituta za archeologiju VII(1): 74–80.Google Scholar
1955. Prethodni izvještaj o iskopavanju nekropole na Lijevoj bari u Vukovaru 1951., 1952. i 1953. Godine. Ljetopis Jugoslavenske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti za godinu 60: 231–255.Google Scholar
1973. Kultura polja sa žarama u sjevernoj Hrvatskoj. Zadar: Radovi Filozofskog Fakulteta.Google Scholar
1983. Kultura polja sa žarama sa svojim grupama. In , , , , , , and (eds), Praistorija Jugoslavenskih Zemalja IV Bronzano Doba. Sarajevo: Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine. Centar za balkanološka ispitivanja, pp. 547–646.Google Scholar
, 1996. Clean the House. Edited Transcription of an Interview between Scott deLahunta and Marina Abramović Recorded in September 1995. In and (eds), The Connected Body? An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Body and Performance. Amsterdam: Amsterdam School of Arts, pp. 15–22.Google Scholar
2010. Marina Abramović on Performance Art. In (ed), Marina Abramović. The Artist Is Present. New York: MOMA, p. 211.Google Scholar
1990. The Monumentality of Death: The Character of Early Bronze Age Mortuary Mounds in Southern Britain. World Archaeology 22(2): 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1982. Death and the Regeneration of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. Skill amongst the Sherds: Understanding the Role of Skill in the Early to Late Middle Bronze Age in Hungary. In (ed), Breaking the Mould: Challenging the Past through Pottery, Manchester 2006. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1861. Oxford: BAR, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
and 2009. Non-discursive Knowledge and the Construction of Identity. Potters, Potting and Performance at the Bronze Age Tell of Százhalombatta, Hungary. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19(2): 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986. Die Frühthrakische Kultur. Zur Bronzezeit in Sudwest Rumänien. Dacia, n.s. 30(1–2): 7–47.Google Scholar
1992. O descoperire de la începutul primei epoci a fierului de la Cârna. Studii şi cercetări de istorie veche şi arheologie a Institutului de Arheologie ‘Vasile Pârvan’ (SCIVA) Review 43(1): 39–45.Google Scholar
, , and 2010. Opening Remarks on a Private Collection. Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts 12(4): 1–3.Google Scholar
and 1979. The Bronze Age in Europe. An Introduction to the Prehistory of Europe c.2000–700 BC. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
2007. Sfârșitul Epocii Bronzului În Sud-Vestul României. Cultura Gârla Mare. Expoziție organizată în capital culturală europeană. Sibiu 7–30 iunie 2007. Craiova: Editura Universitaria.Google Scholar
1961. Necropola Incinerație Din Epoca Bronzului De La Cîrna. Biblioteca De Arheologie IV. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Republicii Populare Romîne.Google Scholar
2012. Rom for variasjon. En studie I bronsealderens tekstilhåndverk. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
1985. Introduction. In (ed), The Creative Process. Reflections on Invention in the Arts and Sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2000. Children, Material Culture and Weaving. In (ed), Children and Material Culture. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 72–86.Google Scholar
, , and 2003. Historical Change, Cultural Learning and Cognitive Representation Zinacantec Maya Children. Cognitive Development 18: 455–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1968. Rezension zu V. Dumitrescu, Necropola de incinerade din epoca bronzului da la Cima. Germania 46: 368–370.Google Scholar
1968. Beiträge zur Chronologie der mittleren Bronzezeit in Karpatenbecken. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
1976. Beiträge zur regionalen und chronologischen Gliederung der älteren Hallstattzeit an den unteren Donau. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
1990. Introduction. Technology and the (Trans)formation of Culture. In (ed), Culture, Technology and Creativity in the Late Twentieth Century. London: John Libbey, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
1975. ‘The Thing’ in Poetry, Language, Thought. Trans. . New York: Harper & Row, pp. 163–187.Google Scholar
2011. Sfâr'itul Epocii Bronzului Și Începutul Epocii Fierului În Sud-Vestul României. Craiova: Editura Universitaria.Google Scholar
and 2012. Communication, Collaboration and Creativity: How Musicians Negotiate a Collective ‘Sound’. In , , and (eds), Musical Imaginations: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Creativity, Performance and Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 233–241.Google Scholar
1935 [2006]. Trans. . Les techniques du corps. In (ed), Marcel Mauss: Techniques, Technology and Civilisation. Oxford: Durkheim Press, pp. 77–95. [Previously published in Economy and Society 1973.]Google Scholar
2011. Obiceiuri funerare în Epoca Bronzului la Dunărea Mijlocie și Inferioară. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
2010a. Living for the Others: Gender Relations in Prehistoric and Contemporary Archaeology of Romania. In , , , , and (eds), Situating Gender in European Archaeology. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 93–116.Google Scholar
2010b. Reconfiguring Anatomy: Ceramics, Cremation and Cosmology in the Late Bronze Age in the Lower Danube. In , , and (eds), Body Parts and Bodies Whole: Changing Relations and Meanings. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 72–89.Google Scholar
2012. Investigating Bronze Age Social Organisation in the Lower Danube Region. The Case of the Žuto Brdo-Gârla Mare Area. Istros XVIII: 13–38.Google Scholar
2010. Interview with Marina Abramović. Body Issues: Marina Abramović's New MOMA Reterospective. Elle 11 March 2010. Available at www.elle.com/culture/art-design/a10958/body-issues-marina-abramovics-new-moma-retrospective-435627.
2007. Das Gräberfeld von Szeremle und die Gruppen mit inkrustierter Keramiknentlang der mittleren und unteren Donau. Berlin: Staatliche Museen zu Berlin.Google Scholar
2003. Cultura Žuto Brdo-Gârla Mare. Contribuții la cunoaşterea epocii bronzului la Dunărea Mijlocie și Inferioară. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Nereamia Napocae.Google Scholar
and 1990. Contribution to the Study of the Gârla Mare Anthropomorphic Statuettes. Dacia 34: 53–76.Google Scholar
1985. Between Anthropology and Theatre. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1987. Victor Turner's Last Adventure. In, The Anthropology of Performance. New York: PAJ Publications, pp. 7–20.Google Scholar
, , and 2008. The Living and the Dead. An Analysis of the Relationship between the Two Worlds during Prehistory at the Lower Danube. Târgoviște: Editura Cetatea De Scaun.Google Scholar
2011. Human Ontogeny and Material Change at the Bronze Age Tell of Százhalombatta, Hungary. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 21(2): 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2012. Touching the Body. The Living and the Dead in Osteoarchaeology and the Performance Art of Marina Abramović. Norwegian Archaeological Review 45(2): 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2013. Death and Gender. In and (eds), Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 527–542.Google Scholar
2006. Beam Me Up, Scotty: Navigating Processes. In , , and (eds), Navigating the Unknown: The Creative Process in Contemporary Performing Arts. London: Middlesex University Press/ResCen, pp. 92–101.Google Scholar
2004a. The Grammar of Drama: An Analysis of the Rich Early Bronze Age Grave at Leubingen, Germany. In (ed), Die Dinge als Zeichen: Kulturelles Wissen und materielle Kultur. Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie 127. Bonn: Habelt, pp. 283–291.Google Scholar
2004b. Stating Identities: The Use of Objects in Rich Bronze Age Graves. In , , and (eds), Explaining Social Change: Studies in Honour of Colin Renfrew. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 167–176.Google Scholar
, 1999. Mind, Materiality and History: Essays in Fijian Ethnography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2010. Reprezentarea statutului social in obiectul arheologic. In and (eds), Istoria Românilor. Vol. 1. Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică, pp. 352–365.Google Scholar
, , and 2010. Epoca metalelor. In and (eds), Istoria Românilor. Vol. 1. Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică, pp. 207–395.Google Scholar
2001. Learning How to Make the Right Pots: Apprenticeship Strategies and Material Culture, a Case Study in Handmade Pottery from Cameroon. Journal of Anthropological Research 57(4): 471–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010. Introduction to The Nature and the Art of Workmanship by David Pye. In (ed), The Craft Reader. Oxford: Berg, p. 341.Google Scholar
1993. A Gazogene in Costa Rica. In (ed), Technological Choices. Transformation in Material Cultures since the Neolithic. London: Routledge, pp. 289–337.Google Scholar
1980. The Limewood Sculptors of Renaissance Germany. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
2012. On Failing Failure: A Letter to Margaret Werry. Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts 17(1): 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. Skill amongst the Sherds: Understanding the Role of Skill in the Early to Late Middle Bronze Age in Hungary. In (ed), Breaking the Mould: Challenging the Past through Pottery, Manchester 2006. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1861. Oxford: BAR, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
and , 2009. Nondiscursive Knowledge and the Construction of Identity. Potters, Potting and Performance at the Bronze Age Tell of Százhalombatta, Hungary. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19(2): 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. Learning to Make Pottery in the Prehispanic American Southwest. Journal of Anthropological Research 57: 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds). 1950. Popol Vuh: The Sacred Book of the Ancient Quiché Maya By Adrián Recinos. 1st ed. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
2000. Children, Material Culture and Weaving. Historical Change and Developmental Change. In (ed), Children and Material Culture. London: Routledge, pp. 72–86.Google Scholar
, , and 2003. Historical Change, Cultural Learning and Cognitive Representation in Zinacantec Maya Children. Cognitive Development 18: 455–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. The Body Impolitic: Artisans and Artifice in the Global Hierarchy of Value. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
and 2004. The Treasures of Intercisa Museum II. The Catalogue of the Permanent Prehistoric Exhibition of Intercisa Museum. Dunaújváros: Intercisa Múzeum.Google Scholar
2006. ‘Resisting Creativity, Creating the New’. A Deleuzian Perspective on Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management 15(2): 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1971, Unele consideraţii cu privire la geneza ceramicii din necropola tumulară de la Lăpuş. Marmatia 2: 36–54.Google Scholar
1975. Contributions à la connaissance de la culture de Suciu de Sus à la lumière de recherches faites à Lăpuş. Dacia, n.s. 19: 45–68.Google Scholar
2001. Zur chronologischen und kulturellen Stellung des Hügelgräberfeldes von Lăpuş. In (ed), Der nordkarpatische Raum in der Bronzezeit. Symposium Baia Mare 7.-10. Oktober 1998. Bibliotheca Marmatia 1. Baia Mare: Muzeul Judetean De Istorie Și Arheologie Maramureș, pp. 231–278.Google Scholar
2004. Mărturii arheologice. Baia Mare: Muzeul Judetean De Istorie Și Arheologie Maramureș.Google Scholar
2011. Repertoriul Arheologic Al Judetului Maramureș. Bibliotheca Marmatia 3. Baia Mare: Muzeul Judetean De Istorie Și Arheologie Maramureș.Google Scholar
, , and 2011. New Work at the Late Bronze Age Tumulus Cemetery of Lăpuș in Romania. In and (eds), Ancestral Landscapes: Burial Mounds in the Copper and Bronze Ages (Central and Eastern Europe – Balkans – Adriatique – Aegean, 4th–2nd Millennium B.C.). Proceedings of the International Conference Held in Udine, May 15th–18th 2008. Travaux de la Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée 61. Lyon: Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée, pp. 341–354.Google Scholar
1984. Komplex der Nagyrév-Kultur. In (ed), Kulturen der Frühbronzezeit des Karpatenbeckens und Nordbalkans. Beograd: Balkanološki Institut SANU, pp. 133–190.Google Scholar
2013. Creative Copies: The Importance of Repetition for Creativity. Paper presented at the conference Creativity: An Exploration through the Bronze Age and Contemporary Responses to the Bronze Age. 10–11 April 2013. Cambridge.
, , and 2000. I Want to Buy a Black Pot. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7(4): 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2012. On Failure (On Pedagogy): Editorial Introduction. Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts 17(1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009. The Thinking Hand. Existential and Embodied Wisdom in Architecture. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
2009. Comments on the State of Research of Suciu de Sus Culture and Lăpuș Group. Marmatia 9(1): 101–145.Google Scholar
2000. Excavation Campaigns at the Bronze Age Site at Százhalambatta-Földvár. In and (eds), Százhalombatta Archaeological Expedition SAX Annual Report 1. Százhalombatta: Archaeolingua, pp. 13–73.Google Scholar
2006. Pots, Houses and Metal. Technological Relations at the Bronze Age Tell at Százhalombatta, Hungary. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 25(2): 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2013. Many Hands Make Light Work: Potting and Embodied Knowledge at the Bronze Age Tell at Százhalombatta, Hungary. In and (eds), Embodied Knowledge. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 117–127.Google Scholar
and 2008. The Authenticity of Ambiguity: Writing the Dis/interest Project. In and (eds), Biographies and Space. London: Routledge, pp. 168–193.Google Scholar
and 2002. Becoming Cultural: Society and the Incorporation of Bronze. In and (eds), Metals and Society: Papers from a Session Held at the European Association of Archaeologists Sixth Annual Meeting in Lisbon 2000. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1061. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 117–121.Google Scholar
2000. Rings of Life: The Role of Early Metalwork in Mediating the Gendered Life Course. World Archaeology 31(3): 389–406.Google Scholar
2005. Metamorpose – eine Vegetationsgottheit in der Spätbronzezeit. In , , , and (eds), Interpretationsraum Bronzezeit. Bernard Hänsel von seinen Schülern gewidmet. UPA 121: 241–261.Google Scholar
1989. Risk, Perception, Innovation. In and (eds), What's New? A Closer Look at the Process of Innovation. London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 300–329.Google Scholar
2001. Learning How to Make the Right Pots: Apprenticeship Strategies and Material Culture, a Case Study in Handmade Pottery from Cameroon. Journal of Anthropological Research 57(4): 471–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2012. The Anatomy of Failure: An Inventory. Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts 17(1): 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , with , , , , , , , , , and Creativity in the Bronze Age. Manuscript in preparation.
1933 [1978]. On the Mimetic Faculty. In (ed), Reflections: Essays Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. Trans. . New York: Schocken, pp. 720–722.Google Scholar
2011. The Case for Working with Your Hands or Why Office Work Is Bad for Us and Fixing Things Feels Good. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
2001. Introduction. In (ed), Locating Cultural Creativity. London: Pluto Press, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
2009. The Thinking Hand. Existential and Embodied Wisdom in Architecture. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar