Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T05:34:20.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

90 - DNA repair inhibition in anti-cancer therapeutics

from Part 4 - Pharmacologic targeting of oncogenic pathways

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Brian M. Alexander
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Alan D. D’Andrea
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Edward P. Gelmann
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Charles L. Sawyers
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Frank J. Rauscher, III
Affiliation:
The Wistar Institute Cancer Centre, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The goal of cancer therapy is to exploit differences between cancer cells and normal cells, thereby gaining a “‘therapeutic advantage.” Current therapies achieve a narrow therapeutic advantage by exploiting the unregulated proliferation that is a hallmark of cancer cells, either by damaging DNA or disrupting other cellular processes that lead to cell death. Novel therapeutic approaches attempt to target receptors, such as tyrosine-kinase receptors, or deficiencies in the cancer cell that are not present in normal cells in order to expand the therapeutic advantage. These strategies rely on finding aspects of cancer cells that are either not present or not essential in normal cells. The DNA repair machinery offers an opportunity for such targets.

One major hallmark of cancer is genomic instability (1). Maintenance of the integrity of the genetic material is of such prime importance to cells that multiple complex pathways have evolved for the surveillance and repair of DNA. There are six major DNA-repair pathways: base-excision repair (BER), nucleotide-excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR), homologous recombination (HR)/Fanconi anemia (FA), non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), and translesion synthesis (TLS; 2,3). DNA damage may also be directly reversed. Adequate genome maintenance and fidelity of DNA transmission to daughter cells requires these DNA-repair pathways, as well as co-ordination with other cellular processes such as the cell-cycle checkpoint machinery. Cells become cancerous following multiple mutations; some of these mutations may be deleterious to the growth of the cancer (perhaps accounting for the high degree of apoptosis in some solid tumors), others may enhance tumor cell growth. While the probability of independently acquiring the multiple mutations required for tumorigenesis with normal repair and checkpoints is extremely low, cancer cells are said to have a “mutator phenotype” – they acquire mutations at much higher rates than normal cells. This phenotype is partially related to deficiencies that cancer cells develop in DNA repair (Figure 90.1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Molecular Oncology
Causes of Cancer and Targets for Treatment
, pp. 936 - 944
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lengauer, C, Kinzler, KW, Vogelstein, B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 1998;396:643–9.CrossRef
Hoeijmakers, JH. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 2001;411:366–74.CrossRef
Kennedy, RD, D’Andrea, AD. DNA repair pathways in clinical practice: lessons from pediatric cancer susceptibility syndromes. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2006;24:3799–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olaussen, KA, Dunant, A, Fouret, P, et al. DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. New England Journal of Medicine 2006;355:983–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, HE, Schultz, N, Thomas, HD, et al. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature 2005;434:913–17.CrossRef
Farmer, H, McCabe, N, Lord, CJ, et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 2005;434:917–21.CrossRef
Hall, EJ, Giaccia, AJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist, sixth edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
Boulton, S, Kyle, S, Durkacz, BW. Interactive effects of inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and DNA-dependent protein kinase on cellular responses to DNA damage. Carcinogenesis 1999;20:199–203.CrossRef
Bowman, KJ, White, A, Golding, BT, Griffin, RJ, Curtin, NJ. Potentiation of anti-cancer agent cytotoxicity by the potent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors NU1025 and NU1064. British Journal of Cancer 1998;78:1269–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brock, WA, Milas, L, Bergh, S, et al. Radiosensitization of human and rodent cell lines by INO-1001, a novel inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Cancer Letters 2004;205:155–60.CrossRef
Calabrese, CR, Almassy, R, Barton, S, et al. Anticancer chemosensitization and radiosensitization by the novel poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor AG14361. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004;96:56–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernet, M, Ponette, V, Deniaud-Alexandre, E, et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, a major determinant of early cell response to ionizing radiation. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2000;76:1621–9.Google Scholar
Noel, G, Godon, C, Fernet, M, et al. Radiosensitization by the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide is specific of the S phase of the cell cycle and involves arrest of DNA synthesis. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2006;5:564–74.CrossRef
Veuger, SJ, Curtin, NJ, Richardson, CJ, Smith, GC, Durkacz, BW. Radiosensitization and DNA repair inhibition by the combined use of novel inhibitors of DNA-dependent protein kinase and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. Cancer Research 2003;63:6008–15.
Miknyoczki, SJ, Jones-Bolin, S, Pritchard, S, et al. Chemopotentiation of temozolomide, irinotecan, and cisplatin activity by CEP-6800, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2003;2:371–82.
Ratnam, K, Low, JA. Current development of clinical inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in oncology. Clinical Cancer Research 2007;13:1383–8.CrossRef
Hu, HY, Horton, JK, Gryk, MR, et al. Identification of small molecule synthetic inhibitors of DNA polymerase beta by NMR chemical shift mapping. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 2004;279:39 736–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, L, Gerson, SL. Therapeutic impact of methoxyamine: blocking repair of abasic sites in the base excision repair pathway. Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs 2004;5:623–7.
Luo, M, Kelley, MR. Inhibition of the human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease (APE1) repair activity and sensitization of breast cancer cells to DNA alkylating agents with lucanthone. Anticancer Research 2004;24:2127–34.
Madhusudan, S, Smart, F, Shrimpton, P, et al. Isolation of a small molecule inhibitor of DNA base excision repair. Nucleic Acids Research 2005;33:4711–24.CrossRef
Durant, S, Karran, P. Vanillins – a novel family of DNA-PK inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Research 2003;31:5501–12.CrossRef
Ismail, IH, Martensson, S, Moshinsky, D, et al. SU11752 inhibits the DNA-dependent protein kinase and DNA double-strand break repair resulting in ionizing radiation sensitization. Oncogene 2004;23:873–82.CrossRef
Lu, HR, Zhu, H, Huang, M, et al. Reactive oxygen species elicit apoptosis by concurrently disrupting topoisomerase II and DNA-dependent protein kinase. Molecular Pharmacology 2005;68:983–94.CrossRef
Shinohara, ET, Geng, L, Tan, J, et al. DNA-dependent protein kinase is a molecular target for the development of noncytotoxic radiation-sensitizing drugs. Cancer Research 2005;65:4987–92.CrossRef
Willmore, E, de Caux, S, Sunter, NJ, et al. A novel DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor, NU7026, potentiates the cytotoxicity of topoisomerase II poisons used in the treatment of leukemia. Blood 2004;103:4659–65.CrossRef
Zhao, Y, Thomas, HD, Batey, MA, et al. Preclinical evaluation of a potent novel DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor NU7441. Cancer Research 2006;66:5354–62.CrossRef
Jacquemont, C, Taniguchi, T. Proteasome function is required for DNA damage response and fanconi anemia pathway activation. Cancer Research 2007;67:7395–405.CrossRef
Chirnomas, D, Taniguchi, T, de la Vega, M, et al. Chemosensitization to cisplatin by inhibitors of the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2006;5:952–61.CrossRef
Fishel, ML, Delaney, SM, Friesen, LD, et al. Enhancement of platinum-induced cytotoxicity by O6-benzylguanine. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2003;2:633–40.
Fishel, ML, Gamcsik, MP, Delaney, SM, et al. Role of glutathione and nucleotide excision repair in modulation of cisplatin activity with O6-benzylguanine. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmcology 2005;55:333–42.CrossRef
Smith, SM, Ludeman, SM, Wilson, LR, et al. Selective enhancement of ifosfamide-induced toxicity in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmcology 2003;52:291–302.CrossRef
Ranson, M, Middleton, MR, Bridgewater, J, et al. Lomeguatrib, a potent inhibitor of O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase: Phase I safety, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic trial and evaluation in combination with temozolomide in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clinical Cancer Research 2006;12:1577–84.CrossRef
Hickson, I, Zhao, Y, Richardson, CJ, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel and specific inhibitor of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated kinase ATM. Cancer Research 2004;64:9152–9.CrossRef
Sarkaria, JN, Busby, EC, Tibbetts, RS, et al. Inhibition of ATM and ATR kinase activities by the radiosensitizing agent, caffeine. Cancer Research 1999;59:4375–82.
Sarkaria, JN, Tibbetts, RS, Busby, EC, et al. Inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase related kinases by the radiosensitizing agent wortmannin. Cancer Research 1998;58:4375–82.
Garber, K. New checkpoint blockers begin human trials. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005;97:1026–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lau, CC, Pardee, AB. Mechanism by which caffeine potentiates lethality of nitrogen mustard. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 1982;79:2942–6.CrossRef
Akinaga, S, Nomura, K, Gomi, K, Okabe, M. Enhancement of antitumor activity of mitomycin C in vitro and in vivo by UCN-01, a selective inhibitor of protein kinase C. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmcology 1993;32:183–9.CrossRef
Arlander, SJ, Eapen, AK, Vroman, BT, et al. Hsp90 inhibition depletes Chk1 and sensitizes tumor cells to replication stress. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2003;278:52 572–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flatten, K, Dai, NT, Vroman, BT, et al. The role of checkpoint kinase 1 in sensitivity to topoisomerase I poisons. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 2005;280:14 349–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirose, Y, Berger, MS, Pieper, RO. Abrogation of the Chk1-mediated G(2) checkpoint pathway potentiates temozolomide-induced toxicity in a p53-independent manner in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Research 2001;61:5843–9.
Mesa, RA, Loegering, D, Powell, HL, et al. Heat shock protein 90 inhibition sensitizes acute myelogenous leukemia cells to cytarabine. Blood 2005;106:318–27.CrossRef
Shi, Z, Azuma, A, Sampath, D, et al. S-Phase arrest by nucleoside analogues and abrogation of survival without cell cycle progression by 7-hydroxystaurosporine. Cancer Research 2001;61:1065–72.
Syljuasen, RG, Sorensen, CS, Nylandsted, J, et al. Inhibition of Chk1 by CEP-3891 accelerates mitotic nuclear fragmentation in response to ionizing radiation. Cancer Research 2004;64:9035–40.CrossRef
Teng, M, Zhu, J, Johnson, MD, et al. Structure-based design and synthesis of (5-arylamino-2H-pyrazol-3-yl)-biphenyl-2ʹ,4ʹ-diols as novel and potent human CHK1 inhibitors. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2007;50:5253–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tse, AN, Rendahl, KG, Sheikh, T, et al. CHIR-124, a novel potent inhibitor of Chk1, potentiates the cytotoxicity of topoisomerase I poisons in vitro and in vivo. Clinical Cancer Research 2007;13:591–602.CrossRef
Wang, GT, Li, G, Mantei RA, et al. 1-(5-Chloro-2-alkoxyphenyl)-3-(5-cyanopyrazin-2-yl)ureas [correction of cyanopyrazi] as potent and selective inhibitors of Chk1 kinase: synthesis, preliminary SAR, and biological activities. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2005;48:3118–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q, Fan, S, Eastman, A, et al. UCN-01: a potent abrogator of G2 checkpoint function in cancer cells with disrupted p53. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1996;88:956–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hotte, SJ, Oza, A, Winquist, EW, et al. Phase I trial of UCN-01 in combination with topotecan in patients with advanced solid cancers: a Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium study. Annals of Oncology 2006;17:334–40.CrossRef
Kortmansky, J, Shah, MA, Kaubisch, A, et al. Phase I trial of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor and protein kinase C inhibitor 7-hydroxystaurosporine in combination with Fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2005;23:1875–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lara, PN, Mack, PC, Synold T, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor UCN-01 plus cisplatin in advanced solid tumors: a California cancer consortium Phase I pharmacokinetic and molecular correlative trial. Clinical Cancer Research 2005;11:4444–50.CrossRef
Sausville, EA, Arbuck, SG, Messmann, R, et al. Phase I trial of 72-hour continuous infusion UCN-01 in patients with refractory neoplasms. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2001;19:2319–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampath, D, Cortes, J, Estrov, Z, et al. Pharmacodynamics of cytarabine alone and in combination with 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) in AML blasts in vitro and during a clinical trial. Blood 2006;107:2517–24.CrossRef
Welch, S, Hirte, HW, Carey, MS, et al. UCN-01 in combination with topotecan in patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer: a study of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II consortium. Gynecologic Oncology 2007;106:305–10.CrossRef
Bobola, MS, Silber, JR, Ellenbogen, RG, et al. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, O6-benzylguanine, and resistance to clinical alkylators in pediatric primary brain tumor cell lines. Clinical Cancer Research 2005;11:2747–55.CrossRef
Maki, Y, Murakami, J, Asaumi, J, et al. Role of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and effect of O6-benzylguanine on the anti-tumor activity of cis-diaminedichloroplatinum(II) in oral cancer cell lines. Oral Oncology 2005;41:984–93.CrossRef
Curtin, NJ, Wang, LZ, Yiakouvaki, A, et al. Novel poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor, AG14361, restores sensitivity to temozolomide in mismatch repair-deficient cells. Clinical Cancer Research 2004;10:881–9.CrossRef
Nguewa, PA, Fuertes, MA, Cepeda, V, et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor 3-aminobenzamide enhances apoptosis induction by platinum complexes in cisplatin-resistant tumor cells. Medicinal Chemistry (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates) 2006;2:47–53.CrossRef
Chen, CC, Taniguchi, T, D’Andrea, A. The Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway confers glioma resistance to DNA alkylating agents. Journal of Molecular Medicine 2007;85:497–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plumb, JA, Strathdee, G, Sludden, J, Kaye, SB, Brown, R. Reversal of drug resistance in human tumor xenografts by 2ʹ-deoxy-5-azacytidine-induced demethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter. Cancer Research 2000;60:6039–44.
Quinn, JA, Desjardins, A, Weingart, J, et al. Phase I trial of temozolomide plus O6-benzylguanine for patients with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2005;23:7178–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaelin, WG. The concept of synthetic lethality in the context of anticancer therapy. Nature Reviews 2005;5:689–98.
Adams, PD, Kaelin, WG. The cellular effects of E2F overexpression. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 1996;208:79–93.
Kamb, A. Consequences of nonadaptive alterations in cancer. Molecular Biology of the Cell 2003;14:2201–5.CrossRef
Mills, GB, Lu, Y, Kohn, EC. Linking molecular therapeutics to molecular diagnostics: inhibition of the FRAP/RAFT/TOR component of the PI3K pathway preferentially blocks PTEN mutant cells in vitro and in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2001;98:10 031–3.
Hartwell, LH, Szankasi, P, Roberts, CJ, Murray, AW, Friend SH. Integrating genetic approaches into the discovery of anticancer drugs. Science (New York, NY) 1997;278:1064–8.CrossRef
Kao, J, Rosenstein, BS, Peters, S, Milano, MT, Kron, SJ. Cellular response to DNA damage. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 2005;1066:243–58.CrossRef
Li, X, Heyer, WD. Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance. Cell Research 2008;18:99–113.CrossRef
Howlett, NG, Taniguchi, T, Olson, S, et al. Biallelic inactivation of BRCA2 in Fanconi anemia. Science (New York, NY) 2002;297:606–9.CrossRef
Abbott, DW, Freeman, ML, Holt, JT. Double-strand break repair deficiency and radiation sensitivity in BRCA2 mutant cancer cells. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1998;90:978–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donoho, G, Brenneman, MA, Cui, TX, et al. Deletion of Brca2 exon 27 causes hypersensitivity to DNA crosslinks, chromosomal instability, and reduced life span in mice. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer 2003;36:317–31.CrossRef
Treszezamsky, AD, Kachnic, LA, Feng, Z, et al. BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient cells are sensitive to etoposide-induced DNA double-strand breaks via topoisomerase II. Cancer Research 2007;67:7078–81.CrossRef
Yap, T. First in human Phase I pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) study of KU-0059436 (Ku), a small molecule inhibitor of poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) in cancer patients (p), including BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I 2007;25.Google Scholar
McCabe, N, Turner, NC, Lord, CJ, et al. Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Cancer Research 2006;66:8109–15.CrossRef
Bryant, HE, Helleday, T. Inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase activates ATM which is required for subsequent homologous recombination repair. Nucleic Acids Research 2006;34:1685–91.CrossRef
Sakai, W, Swisher, EM, Karlan, BY, et al. Secondary mutations as a mechanism of cisplatin resistance in BRCA2-mutated cancers. Nature 2008;451:1116–20.CrossRef
Edwards, SL, Brough, R, Lord, CJ, et al. Resistance to therapy caused by intragenic deletion in BRCA2. Nature 2008;451:1111–15.CrossRef
Iorns, E, Lord, CJ, Turner, N, Ashworth, A. Utilizing RNA interference to enhance cancer drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2007;6:556–68.CrossRef
Kennedy, RD, Chen, CC, Stuckert, P, et al. Fanconi anemia pathway-deficient tumor cells are hypersensitive to inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia mutated. Journal of Clinical Investigation 2007;117:1440–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Andrea, AD, Grompe, M. The Fanconi anaemia/BRCA pathway. Nature Reviews 2003;3:23–34.
Andreassen, PR, D’Andrea, AD, Taniguchi, T. ATR couples FANCD2 monoubiquitination to the DNA-damage response. Genes and Development 2004;18:1958–63.CrossRef
Garcia-Higuera, I, Taniguchi, T, Ganesan, S, et al. Interaction of the Fanconi anemia proteins and BRCA1 in a common pathway. Molecular Cell 2001;7:249–62.CrossRef
Hussain, S, Wilson, JB, Medhurst, AL, et al. Direct interaction of FANCD2 with BRCA2 in DNA damage response pathways. Human Molecular Genetics 2004;13:1241–8.CrossRef
Nakanishi, K, Taniguchi, T, Ranganathan, V, et al. Interaction of FANCD2 and NBS1 in the DNA damage response. Nature Cell Biology 2002;4:913–20.CrossRef
Taniguchi, T, Garcia-Higuera, I, Andreassen, PR, et al. S-phase-specific interaction of the Fanconi anemia protein, FANCD2, with BRCA1 and RAD51. Blood 2002;100:2414–20.CrossRef
Wang, X, Andreassen, PR, D’Andrea, AD. Functional interaction of monoubiquitinated FANCD2 and BRCA2/FANCD1 in chromatin. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2004;24:5850–62.CrossRef
Niedzwiedz, W, Mosedale, G, Johnson, M, et al. The Fanconi anaemia gene FANCC promotes homologous recombination and error-prone DNA repair. Molecular Cell 2004;15:607–20.CrossRef
Taniguchi, T, D’Andrea, AD. Molecular pathogenesis of Fanconi anemia: recent progress. Blood 2006;107:4223–33.CrossRef
Cantor, S, Drapkin, R, Zhang, F, et al. The BRCA1-associated protein BACH1 is a DNA helicase targeted by clinically relevant inactivating mutations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2004;101:2357–62.CrossRef
Condie, A, Powles, RL, Hudson, CD, et al. Analysis of the Fanconi anaemia complementation group A gene in acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia and Lymphoma 2002;43:1849–53.CrossRef
Couch, FJ, Johnson, MR, Rabe, K, et al. Germ line Fanconi anemia complementation group C mutations and pancreatic cancer. Cancer Research 2005;65:383–6.
Hahn, SA, Greenhalf, B, Ellis, I, et al. BRCA2 germline mutations in familial pancreatic carcinoma. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2003;95:214–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, MC, Marks, JH, Mandell, JB. Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science (New York, NY) 2003;302:643–6.CrossRef
Seal, S, Thompson, D, Renwick, A, et al. Truncating mutations in the Fanconi anemia J gene BRIP1 are low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Nature Genetics 2006;38:1239–41.CrossRef
Tischkowitz, MD, Morgan, NV, Grimwade, D, et al. Deletion and reduced expression of the Fanconi anemia FANCA gene in sporadic acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2004;18:420–5.CrossRef
van der Heijden, MS, Brody, JR, Gallmeier, E, et al. Functional defects in the fanconi anemia pathway in pancreatic cancer cells. American Journal of Pathology 2004;165:651–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhillon, VS, Shahid, M, Husain, SA. CpG methylation of the FHIT, FANCF, cyclin-D2, BRCA2 and RUNX3 genes in Granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) of ovarian origin. Molecular Cancer 2004;3:33.CrossRef
Marsit, CJ, Liu, M, Nelson, HH, et al. Inactivation of the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway in lung and oral cancers: implications for treatment and survival. Oncogene 2004;23:1000–4.CrossRef
Narayan, G, Arias-Pulido, H, Nandula, SV, et al. Promoter hypermethylation of FANCF: disruption of Fanconi Anemia-BRCA pathway in cervical cancer. Cancer Research 2004;64:2994–7.CrossRef
Pejovic, T, Yates, JE, Liu, HY, et al. Cytogenetic instability in ovarian epithelial cells from women at risk of ovarian cancer. Cancer Research 2006;66:9017–25.CrossRef
Xie, Y, de Winter, JP, Waisfisz, Q, et al. Aberrant Fanconi anaemia protein profiles in acute myeloid leukaemia cells. British Journal of Haematology 2000;111:1057–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, NC, Lord, CJ, Iorns, E, et al. A synthetic lethal siRNA screen identifying genes mediating sensitivity to a PARP inhibitor. EMBO Journal 2008;27:1368–77.CrossRef
Gallmeier, E, Hucl, T, Brody, JR, et al. High-throughput screening identifies novel agents eliciting hypersensitivity in Fanconi pathway-deficient cancer cells. Cancer Research 2007;67:2169–77.CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×