Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:13:56.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Between Religion and Ideology: Some Russian Hamlets of the Twentieth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2007

Peter Holland
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access

Summary

In 1911, looking back at an epoch, which had come to an end with Leo Tolstoy’s death, and forward, to an already palpable time of change, the philosopher, critic and poet Vyacheslav Ivanov wrote:

From the religious and moral point of view we can distinguish three types of cultural attitudes: the relativist, the ascetic and the symbolic. The first denies the religious basis of culture as a system of relative values. The second (to which Tolstoy belongs), lays bare the moral and religious basis of cultural work, denies all derivative, symbolic or irrational cultural values; it inevitably subjects the instinctive, the playful, the artistic to moral utilitarianism ... identifies the necessary with the useful and the morally correct. The third attitude to culture is according to us the only sound and correct one ... It lies on the heroic and tragic path of liberating the world soul. Those committed to it have sworn ... to turn the inherited legacy of human culture into a symbolism underpinning all spiritual values, and to relate them to the hierarchies of the divine world, to justify the relativity of human art through its symbolic correlation with the absolute. In other words, the task is to bring all culture, and together with it, nature, into a Church mystical, the principles of whose creation coincide with those of the Creation itself.

Ivanov's tri-partite typology profoundly reflects the state of the cultural debate in Russia at the turn of the twentieth century in circumstances of dramatic transition. The mighty imperial structure was unwillingly giving under the social pressures urging for democratization. The century began with student unrest and activities of leftist organizations. While the European fringe of the Empire was strengthened by counterproductive russification policies, the frontier in the Far East was crumbling.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare Survey , pp. 140 - 151
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×