Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:28:40.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Daniel Garber
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Michael Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[Rodis-]Lewis, Geneviève (1950a). Le problème de l'inconscient et le cartésianisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
[Rodis-]Lewis, Geneviève (1950b). L'individualité selon Descartes. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Aaron, Richard I.. (1971). John Locke. 3d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abel, Günter (1978). Stoizismus und Frühe Neuzeit. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, Nigel (1936). The Origins of Jansenism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abra de Raconis, Charles Frančois d' (1633) (1646) (1651). Totius philosophiae, hoc est logicae, moralis, physicae, et metaphysicae. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Abraham, W. E. (1975). ‘Predication’, Studia Leibnitiana. 7:.Google Scholar
Ackroyd, P. R., and Evans, C. F. (eds.) (1970). The Cambridge History of the Bible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord (1987). William Ockham (2 vols.). Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew (1982). ‘Leibniz's Theories of Contingency’, in Hooker, Michael (ed.), Leibniz: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew (1983). ‘Phenomenalism and Corporeal Substance in Leibniz’, in French, Peter A., Uehling, Theodore E. Jr., and Wettstein, Howard K. (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on the History of Philosophy (Midwest Studies in Philosophy). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew (1994). Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aegidius Romanus, Giles of Rome] (1944). Errores philosophorum, ed. Koch, Josef, trans. Riedl, John. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Agrippa, Henry Cornelius (1533). DeOcculta Philosophia. Cologne. (Repr. Graz: Akademische Druckund Verlanganstalt, 1967.)Google Scholar
Agrippa, Henry Cornelius (1974). Of the Vanitie and Uncertaintie of Artes and Sciences, ed. Dunn, Catherine. Northridge: California State University.Google Scholar
Aidius, Andreas (1614). Clavis philosophiae moralis sive In Aristotelis Nicomacheia commentarius. Oppenheim.Google Scholar
Aiton, E. J. (1972). The Vortex Theory of Planetary Motions. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Aiton, E. J. (1985). Leibniz: A Biography. Bristol: Hilger.Google Scholar
Åkerman, Susanna (1990). ‘Queen Christina and Messianic Thought’, in Katz, D. S. and Israel, J. (eds.), Sceptics, Millenarians and Jews. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Åkerman, Susanna (1991). Queen Christina of Sweden and her Circle (Brill Studies in Intellectual History). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
al-Ghazālī, (1953). ‘Deliverance from Error’, in Watt, W. M., ed. and trans., The Faith and Practice of al-Ghazali. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Alberti, V. (1678). Compendium juris naturae, orthodoxae theologiae conformatum. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Alberti, V. (1687). Eros Lipsicus. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Aldrich, Henricus (1704). Artis logicae compendium. Oxford. (Ist ed. 1691.)Google Scholar
Alexander, Peter (1981). ‘The Case of the Lonely Corpuscle: Reductive Explanation and Primitive Expressions’, in Healey, Richard (ed.), Reduction, Time and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Peter (1985). Ideas, Qualities and Corpuscles: Locke and Boyle on the External World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alhazen, Ibn al-Haytham) (1572). Opticae thesaurus. Alhazeni Arabis libri septem, nuncprimum editi. Eiusdem liber De crepusculis et nubium ascensionibus. Item ViteHonis Tliuringopoloni libri X. Basel. (Repr. New York: Johnson Reprint, 1972.)Google Scholar
Alhazen, Ibn al-Haytham) (1989). Optics, Books I-III: On Direct Vision, trans. Sabra, A. I. (2 vols.). London: Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
Allard, Albéric (1868). Histoire de la justice criminelle au seizieme siècle. Ghent/Paris/Leipzig. (Repr. Darmstadt: Scientia, 1970.)Google Scholar
Allen, Diogenes (1983). Mechanical Explanations and the Ultimate Origin of the Universe according to Leibniz (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft 11). Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Allen, Don Cameron (1964). Doubt's Boundless Sea: Skepticism and Faith in the Renaissance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. (1984). The Platonism of Marsilio Ficino: A Study of His Phaedrus Commentary, Its Sources and Genesis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael J. B. (1989). lcastes: Marsilio Ficino's Interpretation of Plato's Sophist. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (1987). Benedict de Spinoza: An Introduction. Rev. ed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Alquié, Ferdinand (1950). La découverte metaphysique de l'homme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Alquié, Ferdinand (1974). Le cartésianisme de Malebranche. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Alquié, Ferdinand (1981). Le rationalisme de Spinoza. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1610a). Theatrum scholasticum, in quo consiliarius phihsophicusproponit et exponit. Herborn.Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1610b). Panacea phihsophica; id est,facilis, nova et accurattt methodus docendi and discendi universam encyclopaediam. Herborn.Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1612). Phihsophia digne restituta. Herborn.Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1613). Compendium logicae harmonicae. Herborn.Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1614). Logicae systema harmonicum. Herborn.Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1620). Cursus Philosophici Encyclopaedia libris XXVII. Herborn.Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1623). Theologia naturalis exhibens augustissimam naturae scholam; in qua creaturae Dei communi sermone ad omnes pariter docendos utuntur: adversus Atheos, Epicureos, et Sophistas huius temporis, duobus libris pertractata. … Hannover.Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich. (1626). Compendium lexici philosophici. …Herborn. (The pagination of the copy consulted – Paris, Bibliotheque Nationale, cote R. 10478 – begins at p..)Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1628). Summa casuum conscientiae, nova methodo elaborata. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1630). Encyclopaedia, septem tomis distincta … (7 vols.). Herborn. (Repr. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann, 1989.)Google Scholar
Alsted, Johann Heinrich (1649). Encyclopaedia … (4 vols.). Lyon.Google Scholar
Alston, William P., and Jonathan, Bennett (1988). ‘Locke on People and Substances’, Philosophical Review. 97:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Diego (1610). De auxiliis divinae gratiae et humani arbitrii viribus, et libertate, ac legitiina eius cum effitada eorundem auxiliorum concordia. Rome.Google Scholar
Amerio, Romano (1972). Il sistema teologico di Tommaso Campanella. Milan: Ricciardi.Google Scholar
Ames, William (1639). Conscience with the Power and Cases Thereof. London. (Repr. Norwood, N.J.: Johnson and Amsterdam: Theatrum Orbis, 1975.)Google Scholar
Ames, William (1643). Conscience with the Power and Cases Thereof. London.Google Scholar
Ames, William (1648). Medulla theologica. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ammann, Peter J. (1967). ‘The Musical Theory and Philosophy of Robert Fludd’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 30:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, K. (1985). ‘Cavalieri's method of indivisibles’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 31:.Google Scholar
Andrés Martin, Melquiades (1976–7). La teohgia espanola en el siglo XVI (2 vols.). Madrid: La Editorial Católica.Google Scholar
Andrews, F. E. (1983). ‘Leibniz' Logic within his Philosophical System’, Dionysius (Halifax). 7:.Google Scholar
Angelelli, I. A. (1975). ‘On Saccheri's Use of the “Consequentia Mirabilis”’, in Akten des II. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses Hannover, 17–22 Juli 1972 (4 vols.) (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Angelelli, I. A. (1980). ‘On Individual Relations’, in Theoria cum Praxi. Akten des III. International Leibniz-Kongresses, Hannover, 12–17.11.1977, bd. III (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa 21). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia (1990). ‘Stoic Epistemology’, in Everson 1990.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia, and Barnes, Jonathan (1985). The Modes of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annual Abstract of Statistics (1992). London: H.M.S.O.
Anon, . (1688). La morale de Confucius, philosophe de la Chine. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Anon, . (1691). The Morals of Confucius a Chinese Philosopher. London.Google Scholar
Antematérielle, (L'ouvrage anonyme) (1969). Ed Niderst, Alain (Publicarions de l'Université de Rouen, 6. Serie littéraire). Paris: Nizet.Google Scholar
Appleton, William W. (1951). A Cycle of Cathay: The China Vogue in England during the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Arbuthnot, John (1710). ‘An Argument for Divine Providence, Taken from the Constant Regularity Observ'd in the Births of Both Sexes’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 27:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arckenholtz, J. (1751–60). Mémoires comernant Christine, reine de Suède pour servir d'éclaircissement à I'histoire de son regne et principalntent de sa vie privée, et aux evenements de son terns civile et literaire (4 vols.). Leipzig and Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Aricò, Denise (1987). II Tesauro in Europa. Studi sulk traduzioni della ‘Filosofia morale’. Bologna: Editrice CLUEB.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger (1987). ‘The Infinite in Descartes' Conversation with Burman’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophic. 69:.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger (1990). ‘Christopher Clavius and the Classification of Sciences’, Synthese. 83:.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger (1992). ‘Descartes and Scholasticism: The Intellectual Background to Descartes' Thought’, in Cottingham, J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger, and Grene, Marjorie (1995). ‘Ideas, in and before Descartes’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 56:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristode, (1936). Metaphysics, ed. and trans. Tredennick, H. (2 vols.) (Loeb Classical Library). London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1619). Opera, ed. Du Val, Guillaume (2 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1660). Ethicorum ad Nicomachum libri decem, ed. Rachelius, SamuelHelmstedt.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1908–52). The Works, ed. and tr. Ross, W. D. et al. (12 vols.). Oxford.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1975). Posterior Analytics, ed. and trans. Barnes, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1980). Aristode, , Minor works, trans. Hett, W. S.. (Loeb Classical Library). London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle [trans.], ed. Barnes, Jonathan (2 vols). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Armogathe, J.-R., and Carraud, V. (1992). Bibliographia cartesiana II. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Armogathe, Jean-Robert (1970). Une secte fantôme au XVIIIème siècle:ju les égoi'stes. Unpublished memoire de maîtrise. Paris: Libraries of the Sorbonne and the Ecole Normale Supérieure.Google Scholar
Armogathe, Jean-Robert (1977). Theologia Cartesiana. L'explication physique de I'Eucharistie chez Descartes et Dom Desgabets. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (ed.). (1967). The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine (1643). De la fréquente communion. Paris.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine (1683). Des vraies et des fausses idées. Cologne.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine (1684). Défense de M. Arnauld contre la réponse au livre des vraies et des fausses idées. Cologne.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine (1685). Réflexions philosophiques et théologiques sur le nouveau systéme de la nature et de la grâce. Cologne.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine (1775–83). Oeuvres de Messire Antoine Arnauld, docteur de la maison et société de Sorbonne (43 vols.). Paris. (Repr. Brussels: Culture et Civilisation, 1965–7.)Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine (1843). Oeuvres philosophiques, ed. Jourdain, C.. Paris.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine (1986). Des vrayes et des fausses idées, ed. Frémont, C.. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine (1990). On True and False Ideas, trans. Gaukroger, Stephen. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, and Lancelot, Claude (1660). Grammaire générale et raisonnée. Paris.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre (1662). La Logique, ou l'art de penser. Paris.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre (1668). La logique, ou L'art de penser: Contenant, outre les regles communes, plusieurs observations nouvelles propres à former le jugement (3d ed.). Paris.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre (1964). The Art of Thinking: Port-Royal Logic, trans. Dickoff, James and James, Patricia. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre (1965). La logique; ou L'art de penser, ed. Girbal, Pierre Clair François. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre (1965–7). L'art de penser: La logique de Port-Royal, ed. Löringhoff, Bruno Baron Freytag and Brekle, Herbert (3 vols.). Stuttgart: Frommann.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre (1970). La logique; ou, L'art de penser, ed. Marin, Louis. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Arndt, Hans Werner (1971). Methodo scientifica pertractatum. Mos geometricus und Kalkülbegriff in der philosophischen Theorienbildung des 17 und 18. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Paul (1960). ‘Descartes et les Rose-Croix’, Mercure de France. 340:.Google Scholar
Arnold, Paul (1970). La Rose-Croix et ses rapports avec la franc-maçonnerie: Essai de synthèse historique. Paris: G.-P. Maisonneuve et Larose.Google Scholar
Arrais, Duarte Madeira (1650). Novae philosophiae et medicinae de qualilalibus occultis a nemine unquam excultae pars prima philosophis, et medicis, pernecessaria, theologis vero apprime utilis (2 vols.). Lisbon.Google Scholar
Arriaga, Rodericus (1632). Cursus philosophicus. Antwerp.Google Scholar
Arthur, R. T. W. (1988). ‘Continuous Creation, Continuous Time: A Refutation of the Alleged Discontinuity of Cartesian Time’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 26:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcraft, R. (1969). ‘Faith and Knowledge in Locke's Philosophy’, in Yolton, J. W. (ed.), John Locke: Problems and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ashcraft, R., Kroll, R., and Zagorin, P. (eds.), Philosophy, Science, and Religion, 1640–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1967). ‘Joachim Jungius (1587–1657) and the Logic of Relations’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1968Propositional Logic in the Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth CenturiesNotre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 9:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1969). ‘The Doctrine of Supposition in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 51:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1974). Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1978). The Tradition of Medieval Logic and Speculative Grammar. From Anselm to the End of the Seventeenth Century. A Bibliography from 1836 Onwards (Subsidia Mediaevalia). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1985). ‘Introduction’, in Sanderson, Robert, Logicae artis compendium (Instrumenta rationis, Sources for the History of Modern Logic). Bologna: Editrice CLUEB.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer (1988). ‘Traditional Logic’, in Schmitt, Skinner, and Kessler, 1988.Google Scholar
Aspelin, Gunnar (1943). ‘Ralph Cudworth's Interpretation of Greek Philosophy’, Götebergs Högskolas Årsskrift. 49:.Google Scholar
Assenmacher, Johannes (1926). Die Geschichte des Individuationsprinzips in der Scholastik. Leipzig: Meiner.Google Scholar
Atherton, Margaret (1983). ‘Locke's Theory of Personal Identity’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy. 8:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atherton, Margaret (1990). Berkeley's Revolution in Vision. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Atherton, Margaret (1993). ‘Cartesian Reason and Gendered Reason’, in Antony, Louise M. and Witt, Charlotte (eds.), A Mind of One's Own. ;Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
Attfield, Robin (1977). ‘Clarke, Collins and Compounds’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 15:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attfield, Robin (1978). God and the Secular: A Philosophical Assessment of Secular Reasoning from Bacon to Kant. Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press.Google Scholar
Aubenque, Pierre (1978). ‘Les origines de la doctrine de l'analogie de l'être. Sur l'histoire d'un contresens’, Les études philosophiques. 1/1978:.Google Scholar
Aubenque, Pierre (1987). ‘Zur Enstehung der pseudo-aristotelischen Lehre von der Analogie des Seins’, in Wiesner, J. (ed.), Aristoteles Werk und Wirkung. Paul Moraux gewidment (2 vols.). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Aubert de, Versé, Noel (1684). L'impie convaincu, ou dissertation centre Spinosa. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
AubignacFrançois Hédelin, abbé d' François Hédelin, abbé d' (1664). Macarise, ou la reine des isles fortunées. Histoire allegorique contenant la philosophie morale des Stoïques sous le voile de plusieurs aventures agreables en forme de roman (2 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Aubrey, John (1972). Brief Lives, ed. Dick, Oliver Lawson. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Auger, Léon (1962). Gilles Personne de Roberval (1602–1675). Paris: Blanchard.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1972). The City of God. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Averroes, Ibn Rushd) (1562–74). Aristotelis opera cum Averrois commentariis (12 vols.), Venice.Google Scholar
Averroes, Ibn Rushd) (1954). Tahāfut al-Tahāfut (The incoherence of the incoherence), trans. Van den Bergh, Simon. London: Luzac.Google Scholar
Averroes, Ibn Rushd) (1984). Ibn Rushd's Metaphysics, trans. Genequand, C.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. (1967). ‘“I think, therefore I am”’, in Doney, Willis (ed.), Descartes: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael R. (1981a). ‘Locke versus Aristotle on Natural Kinds’, Journal of Philosophy. 78:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayers, Michael R. (1981b). ‘Mechanism, Superaddition, and the Proof of God's Existence in Locke's Essay’, Philosophical Review. 90:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayers, Michael R. (1984). ‘Berkeley and Hume: A Question of Influence’, in Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B., and Skinner, Q. (eds.), Philosophy in History: Essay on the Historiography of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael [R.] (1985). ‘“The End of Metaphysics” and the Historiography of Philosophy’, in Holland, A. J. (ed.), Philosophy, Its History and Historiography. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael [R.] (1986). ‘Are Locke's Ideas Images, Intentional Objects or Natural Signs?Locke Newsletter. 17:.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael R. (1987). ‘Divine Ideas and Berkeley's Proof of God's Existence’, in Sosa 1987.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael R. (1991). Locke (2 vols.). London: Roudedge.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael R. (1994). ‘The Foundations of Knowledge and the Logic of Substance: The Structure of Locke's General Philosophy’, in Rogers, G. A. J. (ed.), Locke's Philosophy: Content and Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael R. (1996). ‘Was Berkeley an Empiricist or a Rationalist?’, in Winkler, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Azevedo, J. Luciod' (1947). A evolufao do Sebastinismo. 2d. ed. Lisbon: Teizeira.Google Scholar
Bachelard, Gaston (1967). La Formation de I'esprit scientifique: Contribution à line psychanalyse de la connaissance objective. 5th ed. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1605). The Advancement of Learning. London.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1609). De sapientia vetemm. London.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1620). Instauratio tnagna multi pertransibunl & augebitur scientia [incl. Novum organum]. London.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1623). De dignitate et augmentis scientarum. London.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1627a). New Atlantis. London.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1626b). Sylva sylvamm. London.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1857–74). The Works of Francis Bacon. ed. Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., Heath, D. D. (14 vols.). London: Longmans. (Vols. 8–14 have the title page: The Letters and the Life of Francis Bacon. …). (Repr. London: Longmans, 1887–92; repr. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1989.)Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1860–4). The Works of Francis Bacon. ed. and trans. Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., Heath, D. D. (15 vols.). ed. and trans. Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., Heath, D. D. (15 vols.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. (This edition includes only the material in vols. 1–7 of Bacon 1857–74.)Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1878). Novum Organum ed. Fowler, Th.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1960). The New Organon and Related Writings. ed. Anderson, F. H.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1974). The Advancement of Learning and New Atlantis. ed. Johnston, Arthur. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1984). Francis Bacon's Natural Philosophy: A New Source. A Transcription of Manuscript Hardwick J2A. trans, and commentary by Rees, Graham, assisted by Upton, Christopher (The British Society for the History of Science Monographs, 5). Chalfont Saint Giles, Bucks.: British Society for the History of Science.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1985). Sir Francis Bacon: The Essays or Counsels, Civill and Morall. ed. Kirnan, M., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bacon, Roger (1900). The Opus Majus of Roger Bacon. ed. Bridges, J. H. (3 vols.). London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Bacon, Roger (1983). Roger Bacon's Philosophy of Nature: A Critical Edition, English Translation, Introduction, and Notes, of “De multiplicatione spederum” and “De speculis comburentibus”. ed. and trans. Lindberg, David C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Badaloni, Nicola (1965). Tommaso Campanula. Milan: Feltrinelli. Baillet, Adrien (1695). La Vie de M. Descartes (2 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Baillet, Adrien (1946). Vie de Monsieur Descartes. [abr. vers. of 1693]. Paris: Table Ronde.Google Scholar
Baillie, James (1993). ‘Recent Work on Personal Identity’, Philosophical Books. 34:.Google Scholar
Balfour, Robert (1620). Commentarium in libros Aristotelis de philosophia. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Ballard, George (1752). Memoirs of Several Ladies of Great Britain, Who Have Been Celebrated for Their Writings or Skill, in the Learned Languages, Arts and Sciences. Oxford.Google Scholar
Balz, Albert G. A. (1951). Cartesian Studies. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Báñez, Domingo (1942–8). Tractatus de vera et legitima concordia liberi arbitrii creati cum auxiliis gratiae Dei efficaciter moventis humanam voluntatem, in Comentarios ineditos a la prima secundae de santo Tomas, ed. Heredia, Vicente Beltrán (3 vols.). Salamanca: Instituto ‘Francesco Suárez’, vol. 3.Google Scholar
Barad, Judith (1986). ‘Aquinas on Faith and the Consent/Assent Distinction’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 24 :.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbay, Pierre (1676). Commentarius in Aristotelis physicam… (2d ed.). Paris.Google Scholar
Barbay, Pierre (1680). Commentarius in Aristotelis moralem… (3d ed.). Paris.Google Scholar
Barber, Kenneth, and Gracia, Jorge J. E. (eds.) (1994). Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy. Albany, N. Y.: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Barbeyrac, Jean (1749). ‘Historical and Critical Account of the Science of Morality’, in Pufendorf, Samuel, The Law of Nature and Nations, ed. Barbeyrac, J., trans. Kennet, B.. London.Google Scholar
Barbour, Julian B. (1989). Absolute or Relative Motion? A Study from a Machian Point of View of the Discovery and the Structure of Dynamical Theories (2 vols. in progress): vol. 1, The Discovery of Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Peter (1985). ‘Jean Pena (1528–58) and Stoic Physics in the Sixteenth Century’, Southern Journal of Philosophy. 23(supp.):.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Peter (1991). ‘Stoic Contributions to Early Modern Science’, in Osler, M. J. (ed.), Atoms, Pneuma and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Peter, and Goldstein, Bernard R. (1984). ‘Is Seventeenth-century Physics Indebted to the Stoics?Centaurus. 27:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, F. M. (1966). ‘Christian Thomasius: Enlightenment and Bureaucracy’, American Political Science Review. 59:.Google Scholar
Barnard, F. M. (1971). ‘The “Practical Philosophy” of Christian Thomasius’, Journal of the History of Ideals. 32:.Google Scholar
Barnoum, Jeffrey (1980). ‘Hobbes's Causal Account of Sensation’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 18:.Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac (1669). Lectiones opticae. London.Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac (1670). Lectiones geometricae: In quibus (praesertim) generalia curvarum linearum symptomata declarantur. London.Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac (1683). Lectiones mathematicae XXIII. London.Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac (1734). The Usefulness of Mathematical Learning Explained and Demonstrated… trans. John, Kirkby.London.Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac (1859). The Theological Works of Isaac Barrow, ed. Napier, A. (9 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barrow, Isaac (1860). The Mathematical Works of Isaac Barrow, ed. William, Whewell.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartas, Guillaume Saluste du (1611). Les oeuvres de G. du Saluste S' du Bartas… (2 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Barth, Else M. (1974). The Logic of the Articles in Traditional Philosophy. A Contribution to the Study of Conceptual Structures. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Bartha, Paul (1993). ‘Substantial Form and the Nature of Individual Substance’, Studia Leibnitiana. 25:.Google Scholar
Bartholinus, Caspar (1665). Enchiridion ethicum seu Epitome philosophiae moralis. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barzilay, I. (1974). Yoseph Schlomo Delmedigo, Yashar of Candia: His Life, Works, and Times. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Basnage, Jacques (1716). Histoire des Juifs. The Hague.Google Scholar
Basso, Sebastian (1621). Philosophia naturalis adversus Aristotelem libri XII, in quibus abstrusa veterum physiologia restauratur … Aristotelis errores solidis rationibus refelluntur. Geneva.Google Scholar
Basso, Sebastian (1649). Philosophia naturalis adversus Aristotelem libri XII, in quibus abstrusa veterum physiologia restauratur … Aristotelis errores solidis rationibus refelluntur. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Battaglia, Felice (1982). Cristiano Thomasio. Filosofo e giurista. Bologna: CLUEB. (1st ed. 1936.)Google Scholar
Battail, Jean-François (1973). L'avocat philosophe Géraud de Cordemoy. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Bauer, Barbara (1987). ‘Apathie des stoischen Weisen oder Ekstase der christlichen Braut? Jesuitische Stoakritik und Jacob Baldes Jephtias’, in Neumeister, S. and Wiedemann, C. (eds.), Res Publica Litteraria: Die Institutionen der Gelehrsamkeit in der frühen Neuzeit (2 vols.). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Baumgold, D. (1988). Hobbes's Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bausola, A. (1969). ‘Il perfezionamento dell'argomento ontologico nel carteggio Leibniz-Eckhard’, in Bausola, , Indagini di storia della filosofia. Milan: Vita e pensiero.Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard (1673). A Christian Directory or a Summ of Practical Theology and Cases of Conscience Directing Christians How to Use Their Knowledge and Faith. London.Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard (1682a). Of the Immortality of Man's Soule, and the Nature of It and Other Spirits. London.Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard (1682b). Of the Nature of Spirits; Especially Mans Soul. In a Placid Collation with the Learned Dr. Henry More, In a Reply to his Answer to a Private Letter, Printed in His Second Edition of Mr. Glanviles Sadducismus Triumphatus, in Of the Immortality of Man's Soule, and the Nature of It and Other Spirits. London.Google Scholar
Bayes, Thomas (1763). ‘An Essay towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 53:.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1682). Lettre sur la comète. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1683). Pensées diverses sur la comète. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (ed.) (1684). Recueil de quelques pièces curieuses concernant la philosophie de M. Descartes. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1686). Commentaire philosophique sur les paroles de Jésus-Crist …Canterbury.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1692). Projet et fragmens d'un Dictionnaire critique. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1697). Dictionnaire historique et critique. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1702). Dictionnaire historique et critique. 2d ed. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1713). Commentaire philosophique sur les paroles de Jésus-Christ … ou traité de la tolérance universelle. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1720). Dictionnaire historique et critique. 4th ed. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1727). Oeuvres diverses (4 vols.). The Hague. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1964–8.)Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1730). Dictionnaire historique et critique (4th ed. Prosper Marchand) (4 vols.). Amsterdam and Leiden.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1734–8). Historical and Critical Dictionary. 2d. ed. London (1st ed., 1710). (Repr. New York: Garland, 1984.)Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1740). Dictionnaire historique et critique. 5th ed. (4 vols.). Amsterdam, Leiden, The Hague, and Utrecht. (This is represented as the 5th ed. by the editors, but it is actually the 8th.)Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1911). Pensées diverses sur la comète, ed. Prat, A. (2 vols.). Paris: Société Nouvelle de Librarie et d'Edition.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1965). Historical and Critical Dictionary, trans. Popkin, R.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre (1984). Pensées diverses sur la comète, eds. Prat, A. and Rétat, P. (2 vols.). Paris: Nizet.Google Scholar
Bazzoli, M. (1979). ‘Giambattista Almici e la diffusione di Pufendorf nel settecento Italiano’, Critica storica. 16:.Google Scholar
Beaude, J. (1979). ‘Cartésianisme et anticartésianisme de Desgabets’, Studia Cartesiana. 1:.Google Scholar
Becco, Anne (1978). ‘Leibniz et François-Mercure Van Helmont: Bagatelle pour des monades’, in Magia Naturalis 1978.Google Scholar
Becconsall, Thomas (1698). The Grounds and Foundation of Natural Religion. London.Google Scholar
Bechler, Zev (1974). ‘Newton's 1672 Optical Controversies: A Study in the Grammar of Scientific Dissent’, in Elkana, Yehuda (ed.), The Interaction between Science and Philosophy. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Beck, L. J. (1952). The Method of Descartes: A Study of the Regulae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, L. J. (1965). The Metaphysics of Descartes: A Study of the Meditations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White (1969). Early German Philosophy: Kant and his Predecessors. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bedini, Silvio A. (1991). The Pulse of Time: Galileo Galilei, The Determination of Longitude, and the Pendulum Clock. Florence: Leo S. Olschki.Google Scholar
Beeckman, Isaac (1644). D. Isaaci Beeckmanni medici et rectoris apud Dordracenos mathematico-physicarum meditationum, quaestionum, solutionum centuria. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Beeckman, Isaac (1939–53). Journal tenu par Isaac Beeckman de 1604 à 1634, ed. Waard, Cornelis (4 vols.). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Belaval, Yvon (1960). Leibniz critique de Descartes. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Belaval, Yvon (1964). ‘Premières animadversions de Leibniz sur les Principes de Descartes’, in Mélanges Alexandre Koyré, intro. Braudel, Fernand (2 vols.) (Histoire de la Pensée, No. 13), vol. 2 (L'aventure de l'esprit). Paris: Herman.Google Scholar
Benedetti, Giovanni Battista (1585). Diversarum speculationum mathematicarum, et physicarum liber. Turin. (Also Venice, 1586 and 1599.)Google Scholar
Benesch, Otto (1969). Artistic and Intellectual Trends from Rubens to Daumier as Shown in Book Illustration. New York: Walker and Company and Cambridge, Mass.: Department of Printing and Graphic Arts, Harvard College Library.Google Scholar
Bénichou, Paul (1948). Morales du grand siècle. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Benitez, Miguel (1988). ‘Matériaux pour un inventaire des manuscrits philosophiques clandestins des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles’, Rivista di Storia della Filosofia. NS43:.Google Scholar
Benn, S. I. (1972). ‘Hobbes on Power’, in Cranston, M. and Peters, R. (eds.), Hobbes and Rousseau: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. A. (1975). ‘Hooke and Wren and the System of the World: Some Points towards an Historical Account’, British Journal for the History of Science. 8:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. A. (1981). ‘Cosmology and the Magnetical Philosophy, 1640–1680’, Journal of the History of Astronomy. 12:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. A. (1989). ‘Magnetical Philosophy and Astronomy from Wilkins to Hooke’, in Taton, René and Wilson, Curtis (eds.), The General History of Astronomy: vol. 2, Planetary Astronomy from the Renaissance to the Rise of Astrophysics. Part A: Tycho Brahe to Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan (1968). ‘Berkeley and God’, in Martin, C. B. and Armstrong, D. M. (eds.), Locke and Berkeley: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan (1971). Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan (1984). A Study of Spinoza's Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan (1994). ‘Locke's Philosophy of Mind’, in Chappell 1994a.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan, and Peter, Remnant (1978). ‘How Matter Might First Be Made’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Sup. IV:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Richard (1692). The Folly and Unreasonableness of Atheism…. In Eight Sermons preached at the Lecture founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle…. London.Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard (1693). The Folly and Unreasonableness of Atheism …. In Eight Sermons preached at the Lecture founded by the Honourable Robert Boyle …. London. (Each sermon has a separate title page, some of which date 1692.)Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard (1699). The Folly and Unreasonableness of Atheism.… 4th ed. London.Google Scholar
Berckelius, Henricus (1623). Theses ethicae de summo hominis bono civili … praeside … Francone Burgersdicio…. Leiden.Google Scholar
Berkel, Klaas (1983a). ‘Beeckman, Descartes, et la philosophie physico-mathématique’, Archives de Philosophie. 46:.Google Scholar
Berkel, Klaas (1983b). Isaac Beeckman (1588–1637) en de Mechanisering van het Wereldbeeld (with a summary in English). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George (1709). An Essay towards a New Theory of Vision. Dublin.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George (1710). A Treatise concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Dublin. (Rev. ed. London, 1734.)Google Scholar
Berkeley, George (1713). Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous. London. (Rev. ed. London, 1734.)Google Scholar
Berkeley, George (1721). De Motu. London.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George (1732). Altiphron: Or the Minute Philosopher. London.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George (1733). The Theory of Vision, or Visual Language Vindicated and Explained. London.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George (1734). The Analyst. London.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George (1945). Philosophical Commentaries, Generally Called the Commonplace Book, ed. Luce, A. A., London: T. Nelson.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George (1948–57). The Works of George Berkeley, ed. Luce, A. A. and Jessop, T. E. (9 vols.). Edinburgh, London: T. Nelson.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George (1975). Philosophical Works, ed. Ayers, M. R.. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Berman, David (1988). The History of Atheism in England: From Hobbes to Russell. London: Crown Helm.Google Scholar
Bernier, François (1678). Abrégé de la philosophie de Gassendi (7 vols.). Lyon.Google Scholar
Bernier, François (1682). Doutes de M. Bernier sur quelques uns des principaux chapitres de son Abrégé de Gassendi. Paris.Google Scholar
Bernier, François (1684). Abrégé de la philosophie de Gassendi. 2d ed. (7 vols.). Lyon.Google Scholar
Bernier, François (1992). Abrégé de la philosophie de Gassendi (3 vols.). Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Bernoulli, Jakob (1713). Ars conjectandi. Basel.Google Scholar
Bernoulli, Jakob (1966). Translations from Jakob Bernoulli, trans. Sung, Bing. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Department of Statistics Technical Report no. 2 (12 February 1966).Google Scholar
Bernoulli, Jakob (1969–89). Die Werke von Jakob Bernoulli (3 vols.). Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Bernoulli, Nicholas (1709). De usu artis conjectandi injure. Basel. (Repr. inj. Bernoulli 1969–89, vol. 3.)Google Scholar
Bernstein, Howard (1984). ‘Leibniz and Huygens on the “Relativity” of Motion’, in Heinekamp, Albert (ed.), Leibniz' Dynamica (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Berr, Henri (1960). Du Scepticisme de Gassendi, trans. Rochot, B.. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Berr, Sylvia; Françoise, Charles-Daubert; and Richard, Popkin (eds.) (1996). Heterodoxy, Spinozism, and Free Thought in Early-Eighteenth-Century Europe: Studies on theTraité des trois imposteurs. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Berriot, Francois (1984). Atheismes et athéistes au XVIe siècle en France (2 vols.) (Series: Theses-Cerf). Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Bertelli, S. (ed.) (1980). H libertinismo in Europa. Milan: Riccardi.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico (1988). ‘Leibniz on the Censorship of the Copernican System’, Studia Leibnitiana. 20:.Google Scholar
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico (1993). Equivalence and Priority: Newton versus Leibniz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berts, C. J. (1984). The Early Deism in France. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Bérulle, Pierre (1846). Oeuvres complètes, ed. Migne, J. P.. Paris.Google Scholar
Beyssade, Jean-Marie (1979). La Philosophie première de Descartes. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Beyssade, Jean-Marie (1981). ‘Création des vérités éternelles et doute métaphysique’. Studia Cartesiana. 2:.Google Scholar
Beyssade, Jean-Marie (1983). ‘La classification cartésienne des passions’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 146:.Google Scholar
Beyssade, Jean-Marie (1988). ‘Descartes on the Freedom of the Will’, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal. 13:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyssade, Jean-Marie (1992). ‘Descartes on Material Falsity’, in Cummins and Zoeller 1992.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Massimo Luigi (1982). ‘Occulto e manifesto nella medicina del Rinascimento: Jean Fernel e Pietro Severino’, Atti e memorie dell'Accademia toscana de scienze e lettere, la Colombaria. 47. n.s. 33:.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Massimo Luigi (1983). ‘Sapiente e Popolo nel Theophrastus Redivivus’. Studi storici 24:.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Massimo Luigi (1987). Signatura Rerum: Segni, magia e conoscenza da Paracelso a Leibniz (Lessico Intellettuale Europeo, 43). Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateneo.Google Scholar
Biermann, Kurt-Reinhard (1955). ‘Eine Untersuchung von G. W. Leibniz über die jährliche Sterblichkeitsrate’, Forschungen and Fortschritte. 29:.Google Scholar
Biermann, Kurt-Reinhard (1967). ‘Uberblick über die Studien von G. W. Leibniz zur Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung’, Sudhoffs Archiv. 51:.Google Scholar
Biermann, Kurt-Reinhard, and Faak, Margot (1957). ‘G. W. Leibniz “De incerti aestimatione”’, Forschungen und Fortschritte. 31:.Google Scholar
Birch, Andrea Croce (1991). ‘The Problem of Method in Newton's Natural Philosophy’, in Dahlstrom, Daniel O. (ed.), Nature and Scientific Method (Studies in the History of Philosophy, vol. 22). Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Richard J. (1966). ‘Descartes' Laws of Motion’. Isis. 57:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanché, R. (1970). La logique et son histoire, d'Aristote à Russell. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Blanchet, Léon (1920a). Les Antécédents historiques du ‘Je pense, donc je suis’. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Blanchet, Léon (1920b). Campanella. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Blau, Joseph Leon (1944). The Christian Interpretation of the Cabala in the Renaissance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Blay, Michel (1992). La naissance de la mécanique analytique: La science du mouvement au tournant des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Bloch, E. (1968). Christian Thomasius, ein deutscher Gelehrter ohne Misere. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bloch, Marc (1989). The Royal Touch, trans. Anderson, J. E.. New York: Dorset Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Olivier René (1971). La philosophie de Gassendi: Nominalisme, matérialisme et métaphysique (International Archives of the History of Ideas). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Bloch, Olivier René (1978). ‘Sur les premières apparitions du mot matérialiste’, Raison Présente. 47:.Google Scholar
Bloch, Olivier René (1985). Le matérialisme (Que sais-je?). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Blom, H. W. (1993). ‘Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. Burgersdijk's Moral and Political Thought’, in Bos, E. P. and Krop, H. A. (eds.), Franco Burgersdijk (1590–1635): Neo-Aristotelianism in Leiden. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Blount, Charles (1693). Oracles of Reason. London.Google Scholar
Blount, Charles (1695). Miscellaneous Works. London.Google Scholar
Blüher, K. A. (1969). Seneca in Spanien: Untersuchung zur Geschichte der Seneca-Rezeption in Spanien vom 13. bis 17. Jahrhundert. Munich: Francke.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, David (1973). ‘Leibniz's Theory of the Striving Possibles’, Studia Leibnitiana. 5:.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, David (1984–5). ‘Leibniz on Contingency and Infinite Analysis’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 45:.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, David (1988–9). ‘Freedom, Contingency, and Things Possible in Themselves’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 49:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas Hall, Marie (1965). Robert Boyle on Natural Philosophy: An Essay with Selections front His Writings. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Boas Hall, Marie (1975). ‘Newton's Voyage in the Strange Seas of Alchemy’, in Bonelli, M. L. Rhigini and Shea, William R. (eds.), Reason, Experiment and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution. New York: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Boas Hall, Marie (1978). ‘Matter in Seventeenth Century Science’, in McMullin, Ernan (ed.), The Concept of Matter in Modern Philosophy. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Boas Hall, Marie (1981). The Mechanical Philosophy. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Marie (1952). ‘The Establishment of the Mechanical Philosophy’, Osiris. 10:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Marie (1958). Robert Boyle and Seventeenth-Century Chemistry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1993). Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bobik, Joseph (1965). ‘Matter and Individuation’, in McMullin 1965.Google Scholar
Bochenski, I. M. (1961). History of Formal Logic. Notre Dame, Inc.: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean (1590?). Colloquium heptaplomeres. Herzog August Bibliothek, Wolfenbüttel, Handschrift Extrav. 89.1 and 220.2. (Manuscript).Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean (1857). Colloquium heptaplomeres, ed. Noack, L.. Paris and London.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean (1975). Colloquium of the Seven about Secrets of the Sublime, trans. Kuntz, Marion. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boehm, Alfred (1962). Le “Vinculum substantiale” chez Leibniz. Ses origines historiques. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Boehm, Alfred (1965). ‘L'Aristotélisme d'Honoré Fabri (1607–1688)’, Revue des sciences religieuses. 39:.Google Scholar
Boethius, (1973). The Theological Tractates, ed. and trans. Stewart, H. F., Rand, E. K., and Tester, S. J.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bohatec, J. (1912). Die Cartesianische Scholostik in der Philosophie und Thieologie der reformierten Dogmatik des 17. Jahrhunderts. Leipzig: Deichert. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1966.)Google Scholar
Bold, Samuel (1705). A Discourse concerning the Resurrection of the Same Body. London.Google Scholar
Bolton, Martha Brandt (1987). ‘Berkeley's Objection to Abstract Ideas and Unconceived Objects’, in Sosa, Ernest (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Bolton, Martha Brandt (1992). ‘The Idea-Theoretic Basis of Locke's Antiessentialist Doctrine of Nominal Essence’, in Cummins, Phillip and Zoeller, Guenter (eds.), Minds, Ideas and Objects. Atascedero, Calif: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
Bolton, Martha Brandt (1994). ‘The Real Molyneux Question and the Basis of Locke's Answer’, in Rogers, G. A. J. (ed.), Locke's Philosophy: Content and Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonansea, Bernardino M. (1969). Tommaso Campanella: Renaissance Pioneer of Modern Thought. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Bonansea, Bernardino M. (1983). Man and His Approach to God in John Duns Scotus. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Bondi, E. (1966). ‘Predication: A Study Based in the Ars logica of John of St. Thomas’, Thomist. 30:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonno, Gabriel D. (1955). Les relations intellectuelles de Locke avec la France. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan (1987). The Flight to Objectivity. Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Borkowski, S. von Dunin (1904). ‘Zur Textgeschichte und Textkritik der altesten Lebensbeschreibung Benedikt Despinosas’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 18:.Google Scholar
Borst, Clive (1992). ‘Leibniz and the Compatibilist Account of Free Will’, Studia Leibnitiana. 24:.Google Scholar
Bos, H. J. M. (1972). ‘Huygens’, in Gillispie 1970–80, vol. 6.Google Scholar
Bos, H. J. M. (1974). ‘Differentials, Higher-Order Differentials and the Derivative in the Leibnizian Calculus’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 14:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, H. J. M. (1988). ‘Tractional Motion and the Legitimation of Transcendental Curves’, Centaurus. 31:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossu, R. le (1674). Parallèle des principes de la physique d'Aristote et de celle de Descartes. Paris. (Repr. Paris: Vrin, 1981.)Google Scholar
Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne (1879). Oeuvres complètes, ed. Guillaume, (10 vols.). Lyon.Google Scholar
Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne (1964). Platon et Aristote: Notes de lectures, ed. Goyet, T.. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Bouillier, Francisque (1868). Histoire de la philosophie cartésienne. 3d. ed. (2 vols.). Paris. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1987.)Google Scholar
Bouju, Théophraste (1614). Corps de toute la philosophie. Paris.Google Scholar
Bourke, Vernon (1937). ‘An Illustration of the Attitude of the Early French Jesuits towards Cartesianism’, in Cartesio nel terzo centenario nel' Discorso del Metodo, in Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica. 20(supp):.Google Scholar
Bourne, H. R. Fox (1876). The Life of John Locke (2 vols.). London: H. S. King.Google Scholar
Boutroux, E. (1927). Des vérités éternelles chez Descartes, trans. [French] Canguilhem, G.. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Bouvet, Joachim (1989). Eine Wissenschaftliche Akademie für China, ed. Collani, Claudia (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft 18). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Boyce Gibson, A. (1929–30). ‘The Eternal Verities and the Will of God in the Philosophy of Descartes’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. N.s. 30:.Google Scholar
Boylan, Michael (1980). ‘Henry More's Space and the Spirit of Nature’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 18:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1660). New Experiments Physico-Mechanicall, Touching the Spring of the Air. Oxford. (2d ed. Oxford, 1662.)Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1661). The Sceptical Chymist. London.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1666). The Origine of Formes and Qualities, (According to the Corpuscular Philosophy), Illustrated by Considerations and Experiments, (Written by way of Notes upon an Essay about Nitre). Oxford.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1674). The Excellency of Theology, Compared with Natural Philosophy, (as both are objects of men's study). Discours'd of in a Letter to a Friend…To which are annex'd Some Occasional Thoughts about the Excellency and Grounds of the Mechanical Hypothesis… (2 parts paginated separately). London.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1675). Some Considerations about the Reconcileableness of Reason and Religion. London.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1685/6). A Free Enquiry into the Vulgarly Receiv'd Notion of Nature. London.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1688). Disquisitions concerning the Final Causes of Natural Things. London.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1690). The Christian Virtuoso. London.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1744). The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle, ed. Birch, Thomas (5 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1772). The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle, ed. Birch, Thomas (6 vols.). London. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1965.)Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1911). The Sceptical Chymist. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1965). Robert Boyle on Natural Philosophy, ed. Hall, Marie Boas. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1979). Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle, ed. Stewart, M. A.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, Robert (1991). The Early Essays and Ethics of Robert Boyle, ed. Harwood, J. T.. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Bracken, Harry (1974). Berkeley. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. I. (1966). ‘Blacklo and the Counter-Reformation: An Inquiry into the Strange Death of Catholic England’, in Carter, C. H. (ed.), From the Renaissance to the Counter-Reformation: Essays in Honour of Garrett Mattingly. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Bradwardine, Thomas (1505). Tractatus de proportionibus. Venice.Google Scholar
Brändli, Rodolfo (1964). Virgilio Malvezzi politico e moralista. Basel: Tipografia dell'USC.Google Scholar
Brandt, F. (1928). Thomas Hobbes' Mechanical Conception of Nature. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard (1991). ‘Locke und Kant’, in Thompson, M. P. (ed), John Locke und Immanuel Kant. Historische Rezeption und Gegenwärtige Relevanz. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Brann, Noel L. (1979–80). ‘The Conflict between Reason and Magic in Seventeenth-Century England: A Case Study of the Vaughan-More Debate’, Huntington Library Quarterly. 43:.Google Scholar
Brauen, Fred (1982). ‘Athanasius Kircher (1602–1680)’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 43:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breger, Herbert (1990). ‘Know-how in der Mathematik. Mit einer Nutzanwendung auf die unendlichkleinen Gröβen’, in Rechnen mit dem Unendlichen: Beiträge zur Entwicklung eines kontroversen Gegenstandes. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Bréhier, E. (1937). ‘La création des vérités éternelles dans le système de Descartes’, Revue Philosophique. 103:.Google Scholar
Bréhier, E. (1967). ‘The Creation of the Eternal Truths in Descartes's System’, in Doney, Willis (ed.), Descartes: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bremond, Henri (1967). Histoire Littéraire du Sentiment Religieux en France. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Brerewood, Edward (1640). Tractatus ethici sive Commentarii in aliquot Aristotelis libros ad Nicomachum demoribus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brickman, Benjamin (1941). An Introduction to Francesco Patrizi's Nova de Universis Philosophia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brizzi, Gian Paolo (1976). La formazione della classe dirigente nel Sei-Settecento. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. (1975). Leibniz: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brockliss, L. W. B. (1981). ‘Aristotle, Descartes, and the New Science: Natural Philosophy at the University of Paris, 1600–1740’, Annals of Science. 38:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockliss, L. W. B. (1987). French Higher Education in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: A Cultural History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Broughton, Janet, and Ruth, Mattern (1978). ‘Reinterpreting Descartes on the Notion of the Union of Mind and Body’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 16:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Clifford (1990). Leibniz and Strawson: A New Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. Munich and Vienna: Philosophia.Google Scholar
Brown, Harcourt (1934). Scientific Organizations in Seventeenth-Century France (1620–1680). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Brown, K. C. (1962). ‘Hobbes's Grounds for Belief in a Deity’, Philosophy. 37:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. C. (ed.) (1965). Hobbes Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown, Stuart (1984). Leibniz (Philosophers in Context). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Browne, Thomas Sir (1977). Religio Medici (1643), in Sir Thomas Browne. The Major Works, ed. Patrides, C. A.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Broydé, Isaac (1905). ‘Spaeth, Johann Peter’, in Singer, Isidore et al. (eds.), The Jewish Encyclopedia (12 vols.). New York: Funk and Wagnalls.Google Scholar
Brucker, Johann Jakob (1742–4). Historia critica philosophiae (5 vols.). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Brundell, Barry (1987). Pierre Gassendi. From Aristotelianism to a New Natural Philosophy. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Brunet, Jean (1686). Journal de Medicine. Paris.Google Scholar
Brunet, Pierre (1931). L'introduction des théories de Newton en France au xviiie siècle. Paris: Blanchard.Google Scholar
Brunner, Fernand (1951). Etudes sur la signification historique de la philosophie de Leibniz. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Bruno, Giordano (1584a). La cena de le ceneri. London.Google Scholar
Bruno, Giordano (1584b). De la causa, principio et uno. London.Google Scholar
Bruno, Giordano (1584c). De l'infinito universo e mondi. London.Google Scholar
Bruno, Giordano (1584d). Lo spaccio de la bestia trionfante. London.Google Scholar
Bruno, Giordano (1585). De gli eroici furori. London.Google Scholar
Bruno, Giordano (1879–91). Opere latine, ed. Fiorentino, F. et al. Naples and Florence: Morano. (Repr. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1969.)Google Scholar
Bruno, Giordano (1957). Dialoghi italiana, ed. Gentile, G. and Aquilecchia, G.. Florence: Sanson.Google Scholar
Bruno, Giordano (1964). The Expulsion of the Triumphant Beast, trans. Imerti, Arthur D.. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Bruno, Giordano (1973). De la causa, principio et uno, ed. Aquilecchia, G.. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Bruno, Giordano (1976). Cause, Principle, and Unity, trans. Lindsay, J.. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Brunschvicg, L. (1945). Descartes et Pascal lecteurs de Montaigne. Neuchâtel: La Baconnière.Google Scholar
Brush, Craig (1966). Montaigne and Bayle. Variations on the Theme of Scepticism. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Bruyère, Nelly (1984). Méthode et dialectique dans l'oeuvre de La Ramée: Renaissance et âge classique. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Brykman, Geneviève (1984). Berkeley. Philosophie et apologétique. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd (1969). Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science: The Classical Origins, Descartes to Kant. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd (1970). ‘Gravity’ in Butts, Robert E. and Davis, John W. (eds.), The Methodological Heritage of Newton. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Buckle, S. (1991). Natural Law and the Theory of Property. Grotius to Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buckley, Michael (1987). At the Origin of Modern Atheism. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Buickerood, J. G. (1985). ‘The Natural History of the Understanding: Locke and the Rise of Facultative Logic in the Eighteenth Century’, History and Philosophy of Logic. 6:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullokar, John (1616). An English Expositor, Teaching the Interpretation of the Hardest Words Used in Our Language…. London.Google Scholar
Buonamici, Francesco (1591). De Motu. Florence.Google Scholar
Burgersdijck, Franco (1622). Idea philosophiae naturalis. Leiden.Google Scholar
Burgersdijck, Franco (1623). Idea philosophiae moralis. Leiden.Google Scholar
Burgersdijck, Franco (1629). Idea philosophiae moralis. Leiden.Google Scholar
Burgersdijck, Franco (1626). Institutionum logicarum, libri duo. Leiden.Google Scholar
Burgersdijck, Franco (1631). Idea philosophiae tum naturalis tum moralis sive epitome compendiosa utriusque ex Aristotele excerpta et methodice disposita,…editio tertia prioribus emendatior. Oxford.Google Scholar
Burgersdijck, Franco (1632). Collegium physicum in quo tota philosophia naturalis aliquot disputationibus perspicue et compendiose explicatur. Leiden.Google Scholar
Burgersdijck, Franco (1640). Institutionum metaphysicarum libri duo. Leiden.Google Scholar
Burgersdijck, Franco (1644). Institutiones logicae. Cambridge. (1st ed. Leiden, 1626.)Google Scholar
Burgersdijck, Franco (1654). Idea philosophiae, tum moralis tum naturalis. Oxford.Google Scholar
Burgersdijck, Franco (1675). Institutiones Metaphysicae. Oxford.Google Scholar
Buridan, J. (1509). Questiones super octo physicorum libros Aristotelis. Paris. (Repr. Frankfurt: Minerva, 1964.)Google Scholar
Buridan, Jean (1985). Logic. The Treatise on Supposition. The Treatise on Consequences, trans. King, Peter. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund (1989). The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, ed. Langford, P.. Vol. 8, ed. Mitchell, L. G. and Todd, W. B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, H. (1980a). Logik und Semiotik in der Philosophie von Leibniz (Analytica. Untersuchungen zu Logik, Ontologie und Sprachphilosophie). Munich: Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, H. (1980b). ‘Skizze der Leibnizschen Theorie der Prädikation’, in Theoria cum Praxi. Akten des III. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses, Hannover, 12–17.11.1977, bd. III (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa 21). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, H. (1983a). ‘Die Leibnizsche Logik. Forschungsbericht’, Information Philosophie. 1:.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, H. (1983b). ‘Modaltheorie und Modallogik in der Scholastik und bei Leibniz’, Anuario filosofico. 16:.Google Scholar
Burnet, Richard (1699). An Exposition of the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England. London.Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas (1681). Telluris Theoria Sacra. London.Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas (1689). Telluris Theoria Sacra. 2d ed. London.Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas (1692). Archaeologiae Philosophicae. London.Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas (1697a). Remarks upon an Essay concerning Human Understanding. London.Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas (1697b). Second Remarks upon an Essay concerning Humane Understanding. London.Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas (1699). Third Remarks upon an Essay concerning Humane Understanding. London.Google Scholar
Burnham, Frederic B. (1974). ‘The More-Vaughan Controversy: The Revolt against Philosophical Enthusiasm’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 35:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Norman (1972). Christian Mortalism from Tyndale to Milton. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles (1982). ‘Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed’, Philosophical Review. 91:. (Also in Vesey, Godfrey (ed.), Idealism Past and Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.)Google Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles (1984). ‘The Sceptic in His Place and Time’, in Rorty, Richard et al. (eds.), Philosophy in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burthogge, Richard (1670). Tαγαϑov, or Divine Goodness Explicated and Vindicated from the Exceptions of the Atheist. London.Google Scholar
Burthogge, Richard (1678). Organum vetus et novum; or a Discourse of Reason and Truth. London.Google Scholar
Burthogge, Richard (1687). Prudential Reasons for Repealing the Penal Laws against All Recusants, and for a General Toleration. London.Google Scholar
Burthogge, Richard (1690). The Nature of Church-Government, Freely Discussed and Set Out. London?Google Scholar
Burthogge, Richard (1694). An Essay upon Reason, and the Nature of Spirits. London. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1976.)Google Scholar
Burthogge, Richard (1699). Of the Soul of the World, and of Particular Souls. In a Letter to Mr. Lock. London.Google Scholar
Burthogge, Richard (1702). Christianity a Revealed Mystery. London.Google Scholar
Burthogge, Richard (1921). The Philosophical Writings of Richard Burthogge, ed. Landes, M. W.. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Burton, Robert (1989–94). The Anatomy of Melancholy, ed. Faulkner, T. C., Kiessling, Nicolas K., and Blair, Rhonda L. (3 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burtt, E. A. (1932). The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. London: Routledge. (2d ed. New York: Humanities Press, 1980.)Google Scholar
Bury, Arthur (1690). The Naked Gospel. London.Google Scholar
Busenbaum, Hermann (1688). Medulla theologiae moralis, facili ac perspicua methodo resolvens casus conscientiae. …. Cologne.Google Scholar
Busson, Henri (1933). La pensée religieuse française de Charron à Pascal. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Butler, Joseph (1736). The Analogy of Religion. London.Google Scholar
Butts, Robert E. (1980). ‘Leibniz' Monads: A Heritage of Gnosticism and a Source of Rational Science’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 10:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butts, Robert E., and , Pitt Joseph C. (eds.) (1978). New Perspectives on Galileo. Papers Deriving from and Related to a Workshop on Galileo Held at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1975. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Byrne, Edward F. (1968). Probability and Opinion. A Study in the Medieval Presuppositions of Post-Medieval Theories of Probability. The Hague: Martinus-Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Cafiero, Luca (1964–5). ‘Robert Fludd e la polemica con Gassendi’, Rivista critica di storia della filosofia. 19: ; 20:.Google Scholar
Cajetan, Thomas de Vio [Cardinal] (1598). Commentaria de Anima. Palermo.Google Scholar
Calendar of State Papers, Domestic series, of the Reign of Charles II (28 vols.) (1860–1939). London: Longmans.
Calvin, Jean (1559). Institutio christianae religionis (1536), ed. Barth, Petrus and Niesel, Guilelmus. Geneva.Google Scholar
Calvin, Jean (1961). Institutes of the Christian Religion, trans. Battles, Ford L. and ed. McNeill, John T. (2 vols.) (Library of Christian Classics). London: S.C.M. Press.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1617). Prodromus philosophiae instauratae, id est, dissertationis de natura rerum compendium secundum vera principia ex scriptis Thomae Campanellae praemissum. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1620). De sensu rerum et magia. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1622). Apologia pro Galileo. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1635). Medicinalium iuxta propria principia libri septem. Lyon.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1638a). Universalis Philosphiae, seu Metaphysicarum Rerum luxta Propria Dogmata Partes Tres. libri XVIII. Paris.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1638b). Philosophia Rationalis Partes Quinque. Paris.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1647). Atheismus triumphatus. Paris.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1925). Del senso delle cose e della magia: Teso inedito italiano, ed. Bruers, A.. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1939). Epilogo magna (Fisiologia italiana): Testo italiano inedito, ed. Ottaviano, C.. Rome: Reale Accademia d'Italia.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1951). Opusculi inediti, ed. Firpo, L.. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1954). Tutte le opere di Tommaso Campanella, ed. Firpo, L.. Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1957). Magia e grazia: inediti; theologicorum liber XIX, ed. Amerio, R.. Rome: Istituto di Studi Filosofici.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1974). La filosofia che i sensi ci additano (Philosophia sensibus demonstrata), ed. Franco, Luigi. Naples: Libreria Scientifica Editrice.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1975). Opera Latini, Francofurti impressa annis 1617–1630, ed. Firpo, L. (2 vols.). Turin: Bottega d'Erasmo.Google Scholar
Camus, Jean Pierre (1614). Traite des Passions de L'Ame in Les Diversitez, vol. 9. Paris.Google Scholar
Canfeld, Benoît (1982). Règle de Perfection, ed. Orchibal, J.. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Canguilhem, G. (1955). La formation du concept de réflexe au XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (2d ed. Paris: Vrin, 1977.)Google Scholar
Capp, Bernard S. (1972). The Fifth Monarchy Men. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Capp, Bernard (1979). English Almanacs, 1500–1800: Astrology and the Popular Press. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cardano, Girolamo (1663). Opera omnia (10 vols.). Lyon. (Repr. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1966.)Google Scholar
Cardano, Girolamo (1961). The Book on Games of Chance, trans. Gould, Sydney Henry. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Carlsen, Olaf (1938). Hugo Grotius og Sorø En Kritisk Studie. Taastrup: Handelstrykkeriet.Google Scholar
Carmona, Michel (1988). Les diables de Loudun: sorcellerie et politique sous Richelieu. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Nathanael (1621). Philosophia libera duplici exercitationum decade proposita: In qua paradoxa quaedam ad exercenda juvenum ingenia adversus vulgates huius temporis philosophos suscipiuntur, validisque rationibus confirmantur. Authore N. C. Cosmopolitano. Cui praeit paradoxon, ignorantem docto praeferendum esse. Frankfurt. (Also Oxford 1622 and 1636.)Google Scholar
Carraud, V. (1987). ‘Le refus pascalien des preuves métaphysiques’, Actes du Colloque Pascal et Descartes. Descartes and Tours: Ville de Descartes and Université de Tours. (Also published in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques. 1991 (1):.)Google Scholar
Carraud, V. (1992). Pascal et la philosophie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Carriero, John (1986). ‘The Second Meditation and the Essence of the Mind’, in Rorty, 1986a.Google Scholar
Carriero, John (1987). ‘The First Meditation’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 68:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Robert Todd (1975). The Common-Sense Philosophy of Religion of Bishop Edward Stillingfleet 1635–1699. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Richard B. (1983). Descartes' Medical Philosophy: The Organic Solution to the Mind–Body Problem. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Carugo, Adriano, and Crombie, Alistair C. (1983). ‘The Jesuits and Galileo's Ideas of Science and of Nature’, Annali dell'Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza di Firenze. 8 (fasc. 2):.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruso, Esther (1987). ‘Honoré Fabri gesuita e scienziato’, in Miscellanea secentesca: Saggi su Descartes, Fabri, White (Università degli Studi di Milano, Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia: Quaderni di Acme, 8). Milan: Cisalpino-Goliardica.Google Scholar
Cary, Lucius, Falkland, Lord (1651). Discourse of Infallibility, with an Answer to It. London.Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric (1655). A Treatise concerning Enthusiasme. London.Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric (1659). A True & Faithful Relation of What Passed for Many Yeers between Dr. John Dee … and Some Spirits. London.Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric (1668). Of Credulity and Incredulity in Things Natural, Civil, and Divine: Wherein, among Other Things, the Sadducism of These Times, in Denying Spirits, Witches, and Supernatural Operations, by Pregnant Instances and Evidences, Is Fully Confuted. London.Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric (1669). Letter … to Peter du Moulin concerning Natural Experimental Philosophie. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric (1670). Of Credulity and Incredulity in Things Divine & Spiritual: Wherein (among Other Things) a True and Faithful Account Is Given of the Platonick Philosophy, as It Hath Reference to Christianity. …: as also the business of witches and witchcraft, against a late writer, fully argued and disputed. London.Google Scholar
Casaubon, Meric (1980). Letter … to Peter du Moulin concerning Natural Experimental Philosophie, in Spiller, 1980.Google Scholar
Casper, Bernhard (1968–9). ‘Der Gottesbegriff ens causa sui’, Philosophisches Jahrbuch. 76:.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1906–57). Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit (4 vols.). Berlin: B. Cassirer.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1927). Individuum und Cosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1932). Die Platonische Renaissance in England und die Schule von Cambridge (Studien der Bibliothek Warburg 24). Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1953). The Platonic Renaissance in England, trans. Pettegrove, J. P.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst, Kristeller, P. O., and Randall, J. H. (eds.) (1948). The Renaissance Philosophy of Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Castro, Americo (1954). The Structure of Spanish History. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Caussin, Nicolas (1624). La cour sainte ou l'institution chrétienne des grands. Paris.Google Scholar
Caussin, Nicolas (1630). La cour sainte. Paris, 1630. (Translated into English by Sir Thomas Hawkins. London, 1663.)Google Scholar
Cavalieri, Bonaventura (1635). Geometria indivisibilibus continuorum nova quadam ratione promota. Bologna.Google Scholar
Cavalieri, Bonaventura (1646). Trattato della niola planetaria perpetua e dell'uso di quella. Bologna. (Under the pseudonym Silvio Filomantio.)Google Scholar
Cavalieri, Bonaventura (1647). Exercitationes geometricae sex. Bologna.Google Scholar
Cavalieri, Bonaventura (1653). Nova geometria indivisibilibus promota. Bologna.Google Scholar
Cavalieri, Bonaventura (1985). ‘Opere inedite. A cura di Sandra Giuntini, Enrico Giusti, Elisabetta Ulivi’, Bollettino di Storia delle Scienze Matematiche. 5(1/2):.Google Scholar
Cavalieri, Bonaventura (1987). Carteggio, ed. Baroncelli, Giovanna (Archivio della corrispondenza degli scienziati italiani, 3). Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret (1655). Philosophical and Physical Opinions. London.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret (1664). Philosophical Letters: Or, Modest Reflections upon Some Opinions in Natural Philosophy. London.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret (1666). Observations upon Experimental Philosophy. London.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret (1668). Grounds of Natural Philosophy. London.Google Scholar
Ceñal, R. (1970). ‘El argumento ontologico de la existencia de Dios en la escolastica de los siglos 17 y 18’, in ,Sociedad de Estudios y Publicaciones (eds.), Homenaje a Xavier Zubiri. Madrid: Editorial Moneda y Crédito, pp..Google Scholar
Ceñal, R. (1972). ‘La historia de la lógica en España y Portugal de 1500 a 1800’, Pensamiento. 28:.Google Scholar
Ceriziers, René (1643). Le philosophe français. Paris.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry (1967). ‘Clement of Alexandria’, in Armstrong, 1967.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry (1981). Boethius: The Consolations of Music, Logic, Theology, and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chaldean Oracles, The: Text, Translation and Commentary (1989). Ed. and trans. Majercik, Ruth. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Ephraim (1728). Cyclopaedia: Or, an Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences (2 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Channevelle, Jacques (1666). Ethica seu Philosophia moralis juxta principia Aristotelis (2 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Chapman, George (1941). The Poems, ed. Bartlett, P. B.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Vere (1986). ‘The Theory of Ideas’, in Rorty, 1986a.Google Scholar
Chappell, Vere (1989). ‘Locke and Relative Identity’, History of Philosophy Quarterly. 6:.Google Scholar
Chappell, Vere (ed.) (1994a). The Cambridge Companion to Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Vere (ed.) (1994b). ‘Locke's Theory of Ideas’, in Chappell, 1994a.Google Scholar
Chappell, Vere, and Doney, Willis (eds.) (1987). Twenty-five Years of Descartes Scholarship 1960–1984: A Bibliography. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Charbonnel, J.-Roger (1919). La Pensée italienne au XVIe siècle et le courant libertin. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Charles-Daubert, Françoise (1985). ‘Le libertinage et la recherche contemporaine’. XVIIe siècle no. 149:.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter (1652). The Darknes of Atheism Dispelled by the Light of Nature. London.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter (1654). Physiologia Epicuro-Gassendo-Charltoniana: Or a Fabrick of Science Natural, upon the Hypothesis of Atoms, Founded by Epicurus, Repaired by Petrus Gassendus, Augmented by Walter Charleton. London. (Repr. New York and London: Johnson, 1966.)Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter (1656). Epicurus's Morals. London.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter (1657). The Immortality of the Soul. London.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter (1670). Epicurus's Morals. London.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter (1674). A Natural History of the Passions. London.Google Scholar
Charleton, Walter (1680). Enquiries into Human Nature. London.Google Scholar
Charleton, William (1981). ‘Spinoza's Monism’, Philosophical Review. 90:.Google Scholar
Charron, Pierre (1593). Les Trois Véritez contre les athées, idolâtres, juifs, mahométans, hérétiques et schismatiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Charron, Pierre (1601). De la sagesse. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Charron, Pierre (1606). Of Wisdome Three Books, trans. Samson, Lennard. London.Google Scholar
Charron, Pierre (1635). Toutes les oeuvres (new ed.) (2 vols.). Paris. (Repr. Geneva: Slatkine, 1970.)Google Scholar
Charron, Pierre (1986). De la Sagesse, ed. BarbaraNegroni, . Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Chasteigner de la Rochepozay, Henri Louis (1619). Celebriorum distinctionum tum philosophicarum tum theologicarum synopsis: Authore Henrico-Ludovico Castanaeo de la Rochepozay Pictavorum Episcopo. Editio altera multo locupletior cum selectorum axiomatum additamento. Poitiers. (1st ed.: Poitier, 1612. At least a dozen editions appeared between 1612 and 1667, including Chasteigner de la Rochepozay 1658.)Google Scholar
Chasteigner de la Rochepozay, Henri Louis (1658). Celebriorum distinctionum tum philosophicarum tum theologicarum synopsis … cum Samuelis Maresii notis perpetuis, quibus singularum distinctionum usus vel abusus in rebus theologicis, breviter ostenditur. Groningen.Google Scholar
Chauvin, Stephanus (1713). Lexicon philosophicum. 2d ed. (1st ed. 1692.) Leeuwarden. (Repr. Düsseldorf: Stern-Verlag Janssen & Co., 1967.)Google Scholar
Cherel, Albert (1918). ‘Ramsay et la tolérance de Fénélon’, Revue du dix-huitième siècle. 5:.Google Scholar
Cherpack, Clifton (1983). Logos in Mythos: Ideas and Early French Narrative. Lexington, Ky.: French Forum.Google Scholar
Chew, Audrey (1988). Stoicism in Renaissance English Literature: An Introduction. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Chichon, Nicolas (1620). L'athéisme des prétendus réformés. Poitiers.Google Scholar
Chillingworth, William (1638). Religion of the Protestants a Safe Way to Salvation. Oxford and London.Google Scholar
Chillingworth, William (1685). Religion of the Protestants a Safe Way to Salvation. London.Google Scholar
Chillingworth, William (1687). Religion of the Protestants a Safe Way to Salvation. London.Google Scholar
Chillingworth, William (1727). The Works of William Chillingworth. London.Google Scholar
Christina, Queen of Sweden (1959). Drottning Kristina Maximer — Les Sentiments Héroiques, ed. Stolpe, Sven (Acta Academiae Catholicae Suecanae). Stockholm: Bonniers.Google Scholar
Chroust, A.-H. (1943). ‘Hugo Grotius and the Scholastic Natural Law Tradition’, New Scholasticism. 17:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chroust, A.-H. (1979). ‘Some Critical Remarks about Samuel Pufendorf and His Contributions to Jurisprudence’, American Journal of Jurisprudence. 24:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius (1931). De finibus bonorum et malorum, trans. Rackham, H. (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius (1960). De inventione. De optimo genere oratorum. Topica, trans. Hubbell, H. M. (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cioffari, Vincenzo (1973). ‘Fortune, Fate, and Chance’, in Wiener, Philip P. (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas (5 vols.). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Clagett, Marshall (1959). The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Clagett, Marshall (1968). Nicole Oresme and the Medieval Geometry of Qualities and Motions. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Clair, Colin (1960). Christopher Plantin. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Clair, Pierre (1976). ‘Louis de la Forge et les origines de l'occasionalisme’, Recherches sur le XVIIe siècle. 1:.Google Scholar
Clark, Stuart (1984). ‘The Scientific Status of Demonology’, in Vickers, Brian (ed.), Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Desmond M. (1980). ‘Pierre-Sylvain Régis: A Paradigm of Cartesian Methodology’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 62:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Desmond M. (1981). ‘Descartes Critique of Logic’, in Parkinson, George Henry R. (ed.), Truth, Knowledge and Reality. Inquiries into the Foundations of Seventeenth Century Rationalism (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Clarke, Desmond M. (1982). Descartes' Philosophy of Science. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Desmond M. (1985). ‘Cartesian Science in France, 1660–1700’, in Holland, A. J. (ed.), Philosophy, Its History and Historiography. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Clarke, Desmond M. (1989). Occult Powers and Hypotheses: Cartesian Natural Philosophy under Louis XIV. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel (1705). A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God: More Particularly in Answer to Mr Hobbs, Spinoza, and Their Followers. Wherein the Notion of Liberty Is Stated, and the Possibility and Certainty of It Proved …. London.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel (1706a). A Discourse concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion and the Truth and Certainty of the Christian Revelation …. London.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel (1706b). A Discourse concerning the Being and Attributes of God, the Obligations of Natural Religion, and the Truth and Certainty of the Christian Religion. London. (This includes Clarke 1705 and Clarke 1706a.)Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel (1738). The Works of Samuel Clarke. (4 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel, and Leibniz, G. W. See: Leibniz, G. W., and Clarke, Samuel.
Clatterbaugh, K. (1973). Leibniz's Doctrine of Individual Accidents (Studia Leibnitiana sonderheft 4). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Clauberg, Johann (1647). Elementa philosophiae sive ontosophia. Gronigen.Google Scholar
Clauberg, Johann (1652). Defensio Cartesiana. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Clauberg, Johann (1654). Logica vetus et nova. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Clauberg, Johann (1655). Initiatio philosophi, seu dubitatio Cartesiana. Duisburg.Google Scholar
Clauberg, Johann (1656). De cognitione Dei et nostri. Duisburg.Google Scholar
Clauberg, Johann (1658). Paraphrasis in R. Des Cartes Meditationes de prima philosophia. Duisburg.Google Scholar
Clauberg, Johann (1664a). Physica, quibus rerum corporearum vis & natura, Mentis ad Corpus relaiae proprietates, denique Corporis ac Mentis arcta & admirabilis in Homine conjunctio explicantur. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Clauberg, Johann (1664b). Metaphysica de ente quae rectius ontosophia. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Clauberg, Johann (1691). Opera omnia philosophica, ed. Schalbruch, J. T. (2 vols.). Amsterdam (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1968.)Google Scholar
Clavelin, Maurice (1974). The Natural Philosophy of Galileo. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clericuzio, Antonio (1990). ‘A Redefinition of Boyle's Chemistry and Corpuscular Philosophy’, Annals of Science. 47:.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clerselier, Claude (1667a). ‘Lettre de MT Clerselier. (qui fut luë dans l'assemblée de M. de Montmor le treiziéme luillet 1658 sous le nom de Monsieur Descartes, & comme si c'eust esté luy qui l'eust autrefois écrite à quelqu 'un de ses Amis) servant de réponse aux difficultez que Monsieur de Roberval y avoit proposées en son absence, touchant le mouvement dans le plein’, in Descartes, , vol. 3, Lettre 97.
Clerselier, Claude (1667b). ‘A Monsieur de la Forge, Medecin à Saumur. Observations de Monsieur Clerselier, touchant l'action de l'Ame sur le Corps. A Paris le 4 Decembre 1660’, in Descartes, 1657–67, vol. 3, Lettre 125.
Clucas, Stephen (1994). ‘The Atomism of the Cavendish Circle: A Reappraisal’, The Seventeenth Century 9:.Google Scholar
Clulee, Nicholas (1988). John Dee's Natural Philosophy: Between Science and Religion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cocceji, Samuel (1699). Disputatio inauguralis de Principio juris naturalis unico, vero et adaequato, …. Frankfort a.d.O.Google Scholar
Cocceji, Samuel (1702). Tractatus juris gentium de principio juris naturalis unico, vero et adæquato. Frankfort a.d.O.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Catharine Trotter (1702). A Defence of the Essay of Human Understanding, written by MT Locke. London.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Catherine [Trotter] (1751). The Works of Mrs. Catharine Cockburn, Theological, Moral, Dramatic and Poetical, ed. Birch, Thomas (2 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Coëffeteau, Nicolas (1630). Tableau des Passions Humaines, de leurs causes et leurs effets. Paris.Google Scholar
Cognet, L. (1966). La spiritualité moderne (Histoire de la Spiritualité chrétienne, vol. 3, pt. 2). Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Cohen, Herrera, Abraham (1974). Pforte des Himmels, trans. Häussermann, Friedrich. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Cohen, Herrera, Abraham (1987). Puerta del cielo, ed. Krabbenhoft, Kenneth. Madrid1: Fundacion Universitaria Espanola.Google Scholar
Cohen, Bernard I (1964a). ‘“Quantum in se est”: Newton's Concept of Inertia in Relation to Descartes and Lucretius’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society. 19:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Bernard I (1964b). ‘Isaac Newton, Hans Sloane, and the Académie Royale des Sciences’, in Mélanges Alexandre Koyré, publiés à l'occasion de son soixante-dixième anniversaire, intro. Braudel, Fernand (2 vols.) (Histoire de la Pensée, No. 13) (L'aventure de la science). Paris: Hermann, vol. I.Google Scholar
Cohen, Bernard I (1968). ‘The French Translation of Isaac Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1751, 1759, 1966)’, Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences. 21:.Google Scholar
Cohen, Bernard I (1971). Introduction to Newton's ‘Principa’. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Bernard I (1980). The Newtonian Revolution. With Illustrations of the Transformation of Scientific Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Bernard I (1985). The Birth of a New Physics. Rev. ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Coke, Edward Sir (1684). The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England. Or, a Commentary upon Littleton. 9th ed. London.Google Scholar
Cole, John R. (1992). The Olympian Dreams and Youthful Rebellion of René Descartes. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Janet (1994). ‘The Christian Platonism of Saint Augustine’, in Baldwin, Anna and Hutton, Sarah (eds.). Platonism and the English Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie L. (1957). Light and Enlightenment: A Study of the Cambridge Platonists and Dutch Arminians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colie, Rosalie L. (1963). ‘Spinoza in England, 1665–1730’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 107:.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L. (1992). ‘Stoicism and the New Testament: An Essay in Historiography’, in Haase, Wolgang (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Berlin: de Gruyter, Teil 2, vol. 26.I.Google Scholar
Collas, Georges (1912). Jean Chapelain, 1595–1674. Paris: Perrin.Google Scholar
Collegium Complutense philosophicum hoc est artium cursus sive disputationes in Aristotelis dialecticam et philosophiam naturalem (1624). Complutum (Alcalá de Henares, Spain).
Collegium Conimbricense (1592). In octo libros physicorum Aristotelis. Coimbra.
Collegium Conimbricense (1598). In tres libros de anima Aristotelis. Coimbra.
Collegium Conimbricense (1600). In tres libros de anima Aristotelis. Lyon.
Collegium Conimbricense (1602). In octo libros physicorum Aristotelis. Coimbra.
Collegium Conimbricense (1603). In quatuor libros de coelo, meteorologicos et parva naturalia Aristotelis Stagiritae. Cologne.
Collegium Conimbricense (1606a). In universam dialecticam Aristotelis. Coimbra.
Collegium Conimbricense (1606b). In libros de generatione et corruptione Aristotelis Stagiritae. Mainz.
Collegium Conimbricense (1607). In universam dialecticam Aristotelis. Lyon.
Collegium Conimbricense (1609a). In octo libros physicorum Aristotelis Stagiritae, prima pars. Cologne.
Collegium Conimbricense (1609b). In octo libros physicorum Aristotelis Stagiritae, secunda pars. Frankfurt.
Collegium Conimbricense (1625). In octo libros physicorum Aristotelis. Lyon.
Collegium Conimbricense (1957). Moral a Nicómaco, de Aristóteles, ed. de Andrade, A. A.. Lisbon: Istituto de alta cultura.Google Scholar
Collier, Arthur (1713). Clavis Universalis; Or, A New Inquiry after Truth. Being a Demonstration of the Non-Existence or Impossibility of an External World. London. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1978.)Google Scholar
Collins, Anthony (1707). Reflections on Mr. Clark's Second Defence of his Letter to Mr. Dodwell. London.Google Scholar
Collins, Anthony (1708). An Answer to Mr. Clark's Third Defence of His Letter to Mr. Dodwell. London.Google Scholar
Collins, James (1960). God in Modern Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, James (1984). Spinoza on Nature. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Colman, John (1983). John Locke's Moral Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Comenius, Johann Amos (1942). The Labyrinth of the World and the Paradise of the Heart, trans. Spinka, Matthew. Chicago: National Union of Czechoslovak Protestants in America.Google Scholar
Comenius, Johann Amos (1969—). Dilo Jana Amose Komenského (Opera Omnia), ed. Skarka, Antonio et al. Prague: Academia scientiarum Bohemoslovaca.Google Scholar
,Company of Parish-Clerks of London (1665). London's Dreadful Visitation: Or, A Collection of All the Bills of Mortality for This Present Year. London.
Connell, D. (1967). The Vision in God. Malebranche's Scholastic Sources. Louvain-Paris: Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Connolly, T. K. (1967–89a). ‘Molinos’, in New Catholic Encyclopedia (18 vols.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Connolly, T. K. (1967–89b). ‘Quietism’, in New Catholic Encyclopedia (18 vols.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Conway, Anne (1690). Principia Philosophiae Antiquissimae et Recentissimae: de Deo, Christo et Creatura; Id est, de Spiritu et Materia in genere. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Conway, Anne (1692). The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, concerning God, Christ, and the Creatures, viz. of Spirit and Matter in General …. London.Google Scholar
Conway, Anne (1982). Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, ed. Loptson, Peter. (International Archives of the History of Ideas, No. 101). The Hague: Nijhoff. (This reprints the text of the 1690 Latin edition (Amsterdam) and of the 1692 English translation (London).)Google Scholar
Cooke, Monte (1974). ‘Arnauld's Alleged Representationalism’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 12:.Google Scholar
Cope, Jackson (1956). Joseph Glanvill: Anglican Apologist. St. Louis: Washington University Press.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian P. (1978). Symphorien Champier and the Reception of the Occultist Tradition in Renaissance France. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian (1980). ‘Jewish Theologies of Space in the Scientific Revolution: Henry More, Joseph Raphson, Isaac Newton and Their Predecessors’, Annals of Science. 37:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian (1984). ‘Scholastic Philosophy and Renaissance Magic in the De vita of Marsilio Ficino’, Renaissance Quarterly. 37:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian (1986). ‘Renaissance Magic and Neoplatonic Philosophy: “Ennead” 4.3.5 in Ficino's “De vita coelitus comparanda”’, in G. C. Garfagnini, , ed., Marsilio Ficino e il ritorno di Platone. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian (1988a). ‘Astrology and Magic’, in Schmitt, C. B. et al. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian (1988b). ‘Hermes Trismegistus, Proclus, and the Question of a Philosophy of Magic in the Renaissance’, in Merkel, I. and Debus, A. G. (eds.), Hermeticism and the Renaissance: Intellectual History and the Occult in Early Modern Europe. Washington, D.C.: Folger Shakespeare Library.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian (1990). ‘Natural Magic, Hermetism, and Occultism in Early Modern Science’, in Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. Lindberg, D. C. and Westman, R. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian (1991). ‘A Tale of Two Fishes: Magical Objects in Natural History from Antiquity through the Scientific Revolution’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 52:.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copenhaver, Brian (1992a). ‘Did Science Have a Renaissance?Isis. 83:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian (1992b). ‘The Power of Magic and the Poverty of Erudition: Magic in the Universal Library’, in Ganz, Peter (ed.), Das Buch als magisches und als Repräsentationsobjekt: 26 Wolfenbütteler Symposion vom 11 bis 15 September 1989 in der Herzog August Bibliothek. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian (1992c). Hermetica: The Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius in a New English Translation with Notes and Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian, and Schmitt, Charles B. (1992). A History of Western Philosophy: vol. 3, Renaissance Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Copleston, Frederick (1958). A History of Philosophy (7 vols.). Paramus, N.J.: Newman Press.Google Scholar
Copleston, Frederick (1972). A History of Mediaeval Philosophy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Cordemoy, Gérauld (1666). Discernement du corps et de l'âme. Paris.Google Scholar
Cordemoy, Gérauld (1668a). Discours physique de la Parole. Paris.Google Scholar
Cordemoy, Gérauld (1668b). Lettre Ecrite à un sçavant Religieux. Paris.Google Scholar
Cordemoy, Gérauld (1691). Divers Traitez de Metaphysique, d'Histoire, et de Politique. Paris.Google Scholar
Cordemoy, Gérauld (1704). Les Oeuvres de Feu Monsieur de Cordemoy. Paris.Google Scholar
Cordemoy, Gérauld (1968). Oeuvres Philosophiques, ed. Clair, P. and Girbal, F. (Le mouvement des idées au XVIIe siècle). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cornwallis, William (1600). Essayes. London.Google Scholar
Cornwallis, William (1601). Discourses upon Seneca the Tragedian. London.Google Scholar
Corsano, Antonio (1961). Tommaso Campanella. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Corsano, Antonio (1965). ‘Campanella e Galileo’, Giornale critico della filosofia italiana. 3rd ser., 19:.Google Scholar
Costa, M. J. (1983). ‘What Cartesian Ideas Are Not’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 12:.Google Scholar
Costabel, Pierre (1956). ‘La “loi admirable” de Christiaan Huygens’, Revue d'Histoire des Sciences. 9:.Google Scholar
Costabel, Pierre (1957). ‘La septième règle du choc élastique de Christiaan Huygens’, Revue d'Histoire des Sciences. 10:.Google Scholar
Costabel, Pierre (1960). Leibniz et la dynamique: les textes de 1692. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Costabel, Pierre (1973). Leibniz and Dynamics: The Texts of 1692, trans. Maddison, R. E. W.. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Costabel, Pierre (1986). ‘Mariotte et les règles du mouvement’, in [Blay, Michel] (ed.), Mariotte (†1684): analyse d'une renommée savant et philosophe. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Costello, William T. (1958). The Scholastic Curriculum at Early Seventeenth-Century Cambridge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottier, A. (1943). Der Gottesbeweis in der modernen Aufklärungsphilosophie. Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Wolff, Kant. Bern: H. Luthy.Google Scholar
Cottingham, John G. (1986). Descartes. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cottingham, John G. (1988). ‘The Intellect, the Will and the Passions: Spinoza's Critique of Descartes’. Journal of the History of Philosophy. 26:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, John G., (ed.) (1994). Reason, Will, and Sensation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coudert, Allison (1975). ‘A Cambridge Platonist's Kabbalist Nightmare’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 36:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coudert, Allison (1978). ‘Some Theories of a Natural Language from the Renaissance to the Seventeenth Century’, in Magia Naturalis 1978.Google Scholar
Coudert, Allison (1995). Leibniz and the Kabbalah (International Archives of the History of Ideas). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coumet, Ernest (1970). ‘La théorie du hasard est-elle née par hasard?Annales: Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations. 25:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couplet, Philippe S. J., et al. (1687). Confucius Sinarum Phiilosophus. Paris.Google Scholar
Courcelle, P. (1981). L'entretien de Pascal et Sacy. Ses sources et ses énigmes. 2d ed. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Courtine, J.-F. (1979). ‘Le projet suarézien de la métaphysique’, Archives de Philosophie. 42:.Google Scholar
Courtine, J.-F. (1980). ‘Le statut ontologique du possible selon Suarez’, Cuadernos Salmatinos de Filosofia. VII:.Google Scholar
Courtine, J.-F. (1990). Suarez et le système de la métaphysique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousin, V. (1845). Fragments de philosophie cartésienne. Paris. (2d ed. 1866.)Google Scholar
Couturat, L. (1901). La logique de Leibniz d'après des documents inédits. Paris: Alcan. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1961.)Google Scholar
Craig, Edward (1987). The Mind of God and the Works of Man. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, John (1699). Theologiae christianae principia mathematica. London.Google Scholar
Craig, John (1964). Rules of Historical Evidence (History and Theory). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cranston, M., and Peters, R. S. (eds.) (1972). Hobbes and Rousseau: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Cranston, Maurice (1957). John Locke: A Biography. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Cranz, Edward F. (1959). An Essay on the Development of Luther's Thought on Justice, Law and Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Crapulli, Giovanni (1969). Mathesis universalis: Genesi di un'idea net XVI secolo. Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateneo.Google Scholar
Crassot, J. (1618). Physica. Paris.Google Scholar
Craven, James B. (1902). Doctor Robert Fludd, Robertus de Fluctibus, the English Rosicrucian: Life and Writings. Kirkwall: Wm. Peace.Google Scholar
Crell, Johann (1663). Ethica Aristotelica ad sacrarum literarum normam emendata …. Ethica Christiana, seu Explicatio virtutum et vitiorum quorum in sacris literis fit mentio. Lüneburg.Google Scholar
Cress, Donald (1973). ‘Does Descartes' “Ontological Argument” Stand on Its Own?International Studies in Philosophy. 5:.Google Scholar
Cristofolini, Paolo (1974). Cartesiani e sociniani. Urbino: AGE.Google Scholar
Crocker, Robert (1990). ‘Mysticism and Enthusiasm in Henry More’, in Hutton 1990.Google Scholar
Crombie, Alistair C. (1953). Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science. 1100–1700. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crombie, Alistair C. (1959). Medieval and Early Modern Science. 2d ed. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Crombie, Alistair C. (1975). ‘Marin Mersenne and the Problem of Scientific Acceptability’, Physis. 17:.Google Scholar
Cronin, T. J. (1960). ‘Eternal truths in the thought of Descartes and of His adversary’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 21:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, T. J. (1966). Objective Being in Descartes and Suarez. Rome: Analecta Gregoriana.Google Scholar
Crowe, Michael B. (1977a). ‘An Eccentric Seventeenth-century Witness to the Natural Law: John Selden (1584–1654)’, Natural Law Forum. 12:.Google Scholar
Crowe, Michael B. (1977b). The Changing Profile of Natural Law. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crusius, Christian August (1745). Entwurf der nothwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph (1678). The True Intellectual System of the Universe (2 vols.). London. (Repr. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1964 and New York: Garland, 1978.)Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph (1731). A Treatise concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality. London. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1976.)Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph (1837–8). The True Intellectual System of the Universe …; A Treatise on Immutable Morality, etc., ed. Birch, Thomas (2 vols.). Andover, Mass.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph (1838). A Treatise of Free Will. London.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Ralph (1845). True Intellectual System of the Universe: Wherein All the Reason and Philosophy of Atheism Is Confuted, and Its Impossibility Demonstrated, with a Treatise concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality, with notes by Mosheim, J. L., trans. Harrison, J. (3 vols.). London: T. Tegg.Google Scholar
Culverwel, Nathaniel (1651). Spiritual Opticks: Or a Glasse Discovering the Weakness and Imperfection of a Christians Knowledge in This Life. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Culverwel, Nathaniel (1652). An Elegant and Learned Discourse of the Light of Nature…London. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1978.)Google Scholar
Culverwel, Nathaniel (1857). An Elegant and Learned Discourse of the Light of Nature, ed. Brown, John. Edinburgh: Constable.Google Scholar
Culverwel, Nathaniel (1971). An Elegant and Learned Discourse of the Light of Nature, ed. Green, R. A. and MacCallum, H.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumberland, Richard (1672). De legibus naturae. Disquisitio philosophica, in qua earum forma, summa capita, ordo, promulgatio & obligatio e rerum natura investigantur; quinetiam elementa philosophiae Hobbianae, cummoralis tum civilis, considerantur & refutantur. London.Google Scholar
Cumberland, Richard (1727). A Treatise of the Laws of Nature. London.Google Scholar
Cumberland, Richard (1744). Traité philosophique des loix naturelles, trans. Barbeyrac, J.. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. S. (1993). A Question of Rites: Friar Domingo Navarrete and the Jesuits in China. Aldershot, Hants: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Cummins, , Phillip, , and Zoeller, , Guenter, (eds.) (1992). Minds, Ideas and Objects. Atascedero, Calif.: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
Cunaeus, Petrus (1617). De Republica Hebraeorum. Leiden.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1634). Nouvelles pensées sur les causes de la lumière, du débordement du Nil et de I'amour d'inclination. Paris.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1640). Les charactères des passions, volume I: amour, joie, rire, désir, éspérance. Paris.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1645). Les charactères des passions, volume II: des passions courageuses…Paris.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1647). Traité de la connoissance des animaux. Paris.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1648). Les caractères des passions. Paris.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1650). Nouvelles observations et conjectures sur I'iris. Paris.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1657). La lumière. Paris.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1658). Les caractères des passions (vols. 1 and 2). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1659a). Les charactères des passions, volumes III et IV: haine, doleur…Paris.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1659b). L'art de connoistre les hommes. Première partie où sont contenus les discours préliminaires…Paris.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1662). Les charactères des passions, volume V: larmes, crainte, désespoir. Paris.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1664). Le Système de I'âme. Paris.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1666). L'art de connoistre les hommes. Partie troisième qui contient la défense de I'extension des parties libres de I'âme. Paris.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1667). Discours de I'amitié et de la haine qui se trouvent envers les animaux. Paris.Google Scholar
Cureau de la Chambre, Marin (1989). Traité de la connoissance des animaux, ed. Le Guern, O.. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1969). Spinoza's Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1975). ‘Descartes, Spinoza, and the Ethics of Belief’, in Mandelbaum, M. and Freeman, E. (eds.). Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation. LaSalle Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1978). Descartes against the Skeptics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1982). ‘Leibniz on Locke on Personal Identity’, in Hooker, M. (ed.), Leibniz: Critical and Interpretative Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1984). ‘Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths’, Philosophical Review. 93:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1986). ‘Analysis in the Meditations: The Quest for Clear and Distinct Ideas’, in Rorty 1986a.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1988). Behind the Geometrical Method. A Reading of Spinoza's Ethics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Curley, E. M., and Pierre-François, Moreau, eds. (1990). Spinoza: Issues and Directions. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Curry, Patrick (1985). ‘Revisions of Science and Magic’, History of Science. 23:.Google ScholarPubMed
Curry, Patrick (1989). Prophecy and Power: Astrology in Early Modern England. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cuvillier, Armand (1954). Essai sur la mystique de Malebranche. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
D'Agostino, E. B. (1976). ‘Leibniz on Compossibility and Relational Predicates’, The Philosophical Quarterly. 26:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalgarno, George (1661). Ars signorum, vulgo character universalis et lingua philosophica. London.Google Scholar
Damrosch, Leopold (1979). ‘Hobbes as Reformation Theologian: Implications of the Free-Will Controversy’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 40:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Gabriel (1690). Voiage du Monde de Descartes. Paris.Google Scholar
Daniel, Gabriel (1693). Nouvelles difficultés proposées par un péripatéticien à I'auteur du Voyage du monde de Descartes. Paris. (Repr. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1970.)Google Scholar
Daniel, Gabriel (1694). Entretiens de Cléandre et d'Eudoxe sur les Lettres provinciates de Pascal. Cologne and Rouen.Google Scholar
Darmon, Albert (1985). Les corps immatériels. Esprits et images dans I'oeuvre de Marin Cureau de la Chambre (1594–1669). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert (1970). Mesmerism and the End of the Enlightenment in France. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (forthcoming). ‘Norm and normativity’, in The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dascal, M. (1980). ‘Leibniz's Early View on Definition’, in Theoria cum Praxi. Akten des III. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses, Hannover, 12–17.11.1977, bd. III (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplements 21). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine (1988). Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, B. (1985). Thinking about God. London: Chapman.Google ScholarPubMed
Davies, David (1954). The World of the Elseviers: 1580–1712. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davion, Julien (1660). La Philosophie de Socrate. Le Crayon du Christianisme en la philosophie de Socrate. Paris.Google Scholar
De Angelis, Enrico (1964). Il metodo geometrico nella filosofia del seicento. Pisa: Istituto di filosofia.Google Scholar
De Beer, G. R. (1950). ‘Some Letters of Thomas Hobbes’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society. 7:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Dainville, François (1978). L'éducation des jésuites (XVIe-XVIIIe siècles). Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
De Dijn, H. (1974). ‘Historical Remarks on Spinoza's Theory of Definition’, in van der Bend, J. G. (ed.), Spinoza on Knowing, Being and Freedom. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
De Dijn, H. (1986). ‘Spinoza's Logic or Art of Perfect Thinking’, Studia Spinozana. 2:.Google Scholar
De Gandt, François (1986a). ‘Les Mécaniques attribuées à Aristote et le renouveau de la science des machines au XVIe siècle’, Les études philosophiques. 1986:.Google Scholar
De Gandt, François (1986b). ‘Le style mathématique des Principia de Newton’, Revue d'histoire des sciences. 39:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Launay, Gilles (1673). Dialectique. Paris.Google Scholar
De Mas, Enrico (1982). L'attesa del secolo aureo (1603–1625): saggio di storia delle idee del secolo XVII. Florence: L. S. Olschki.Google Scholar
de Melles, Etienne (1669b). Selecta opuscula isagogica ad novum ejusdem syntagma. Paris.Google Scholar
De Moivre, Abraham (1756). The Doctrine of Chances. 3d ed. London.Google Scholar
De Pauley, William C. (1937). The Candle of the Lord; Studies in the Cambridge Platonists. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
De Vries, Gerard (1718). De catholicis rerum attributis determinationes ontologicae. 6th ed. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
De Witt, Johann (1671). Waerdye van Lyf-Renten. The Hague. (Repr. in J. Bernoulli 1969–89, vol. 3.)Google Scholar
De Witt, Johann (1856). Waerdye van Lyf-Renten, trans. Hendricks, E., in Barnwell, Robert G., A Sketch of the Life and Times of John De Witt. New York: Pudney and Russell.Google Scholar
Dear, Peter (1984). ‘Marin Mersenne and the Probabilistic Roots of “Mitigated Scepticism’”, Journal of History of Philosophy. 22:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dear, Peter R. (1988). Mersenne and the Learning of the Schools. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Debus, Allen G. (1965). The English Paracelsians. London: Oldbourne.Google Scholar
Debus, Allen G., ed. (1972). Science, Medicine and Society in the Renaissance (2 vols.). New York: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Debus, Allen G. (1977). The Chemical Philosophy: Paracelsian Science and Medicine in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (2 vols.). New York: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Debus, Allen G. (1987). Chemistry, Alchemy and the New Philosophy, 1550–1700. London: Variorum.Google Scholar
Debus, Allen G. (1991). The French Paracelsians: The Chemical Challenge to Medical and Scientific Tradition in Early Modern France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deer Richardson, Linda (1985). ‘The Generation of Disease: Occult Causes and Diseases of the Total Substance’, in Wear, A., French, R. K., and Lonie, I. M. (eds.), The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deferrari, Roy J.; Barry, Sister M. Inviolata; and McGuiness, Ignatius (eds.) (1948). A Lexicon of St. Thomas Aquinas based on The Summa Theologica and Selected Passages of His Other Works. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Del Noce, A. (1965). Il problema dell'ateismo. 2d. ed. Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar
Del Torre, Maria Assunta 1968. Studi su Cesare Cremonini. Cosmologia e logica nel aristotelismo padovano. Padua: Antenore.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Giambattista (1658). Natural Magick. London.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (1993). ‘Spinoza's Argument for the Identity Theory’, The Philosophical Review. 102:.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (1996). ‘Spinoza's Metaphysical Psychology’, in Garrett, Don (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (forthcoming). ‘Egoism and the Imitation of Affects in Spinoza’, in Yovel, Yirmiyahu (ed.), Reason and the Free Man. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Deman, Thomas (1936). ‘Probabilisme’, in Vacant, A., Mangenot, E., and Amann, E., eds., Dictionnaire de Théologie. Paris: Librarie Letouzey et Ané.Google Scholar
Demé, Nelly (1985). ‘La table des catégories chez Hobbes’, Archives de philosophie. 48:.Google Scholar
Den Uyl, D., and Rice, L. (1990). ‘Spinoza and Hume on Individuals’, Reason Papers. 15:.Google Scholar
Denley, Peter (1981). ‘Recent Studies on Italian Universities of the Middle Ages and Renaissance’, History of Universities. 1:.Google Scholar
Denzer, H. (1972). Moralphilosophie und Naturrecht bei Samuel pufendorf. Eine geistes- und wissenschafts-geschichtliche Untersuchung zur Geburt des Naturrechts aus der praktischen Philosophie. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Denzinger, Henricus (1963). Enchiridion Symbolorum, Definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum. 32d ed. Schonmetzer, A.. Rome and Freiburg i.B.: Herder.Google Scholar
Deprun, Jean (1963). ‘Jean Meslier et I'héritage cartésien’, Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 24:.Google Scholar
Deprun, Jean (1988). ‘Qu'est-ce qu'une passion de I'âme? Descartes et ses prédécesseurs’, Revue philosophique Français. 178:.Google Scholar
Derathé, R. (1988). Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la science politique de son temps. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Derham, William (1716). Physico-Theology, Or, A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God from His Works of Creation. 4th ed. rev. London. (Repr. New York: Arno Press, 1977.)Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1967). ‘Le Cogito et I'histoire de la folie’, in L'Ecriture et la difference. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Des Places, EdouardOracles Chaldaïques (1971). Ed. and trans. [French]. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1637). Discours de la methode pour bien conduire sa raison & chercher la verité dans les sciences. Plus La dioptrique. Les meteores. Et La geometrie. Qui sont des essais de cete methode. Leiden.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1641). Meditationes de prima philosophia, in qua Dei existentia, et animae immortalitas demonstratur. Paris.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1642). Meditationes de prima philosophia, In quibus Dei existentia, et animae humanae à corpore distinctio, demonstratur. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1644). Principia philosophiae. Paris.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1647a). Les principes de la philosophie. Paris.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1647b). Les méditations métaphysiques de René Descartes touchant la premiere philosophie dans lesquelles I'esistence de Dieu, et la distinction réelle entre I'ame et le corps de I'homme, sont demonstrées. Paris.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1649). Les passions de I'âme. Paris.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1657–67). Lettres de Mr Descartes, ed. Clerselier, C. (3 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1664). L'Homme de René Descartes, et un Traité de la Formation du Foetus du mesme Autheur, Avec les Remarques de Louys de la Forge … sur le Traitte de I'Homme de René Descartes, et sur les Figures par luy inventées. Paris.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1677). L'Homme de René Descartes, et la Formation du Foetus, avec les Remarques de Louis de la Forge. A quoy I'on a ajouté Le Monde, ou Traité de la Lumiere, du mesme Autheur. Paris.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1936–63). Descartes: Correspondence publiée avec une introduction et des notes, ed. Adam, C. and Milhaud, G. (8 vols.). Paris: Alcan and Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1954). The Geometry of René Descartes: With a Facsimile of the First Edition, 1637, trans. Smith, David Eugene and Latham, Marcia L.. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1959). Lettres à Regius et remarques sur I'explication de I'esprit humain, ed. Lewis, G. Rodis. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1964–74). Oeuvres de Descartes, ed. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. New ed. (II vols.). Paris: CNRS/Vrin. (Original ed. Paris: Cerf, 1897–1913.)Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1967). Discours de la méthode. Texte et commentaire par Etienne Gilson. 4th ed. (Bibliothèque des Textes Philosophiques: Textes et Commentaires). Paris: Vrin. (Ist ed. 1925.)Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1970a). Philosophical Letters, trans. Kenny, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1970b). The World, or Treatise on Light. (Le monde, ou Traité de la lumière (1632; Paris, 1664)), trans. Mahoney, M. S.. New York. Abaris Books.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1972). Treatise of Man, trans. Hall, T. S.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1976). Conversation with Burman, trans. Cottingham, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1977). Règles utiles et claires pour la direction de I'esprit en la recherche de la vérité, ed. and trans. Marion, Jean-Luc. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1979). Le monde, ou Traité de la lumière; The World, or Treatise on Light, trans. Mahoney, M.. New York: Abaris Books.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1981). L'entretien avec Burman, ed. Beyssade, J.-M.. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1984–91). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, ed. and trans. , John Cottingham, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald, and Kenny, Anthony (3 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Desgabets, Robert (1675). Critique de la critique de la recherche de la vérité. Paris.Google Scholar
Desgabets, Robert (1983). Oeuvres Philosophiques inédites, ed. Beaude, J.. Amsterdam: Quadratures.Google Scholar
Detel, Wolfgang (1978). Scientia Renum Natura Occultarum. Methodologischen Studien zur Physik Pierre Gassendis. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewhurst, Kenneth (1963). John Locke (1632–1704), Physician and Philosopher: A Medical Biography with an Edition of the Medical Notes in his Journals. London: Wellcome Historical Medical Library.Google Scholar
Dewhurst, Kenneth (1966). Dr. Thomas Sydenham (1624–1689). London: Wellcome Historical Medical Library.Google Scholar
Di Napoli, Giovanni (1947). Tommaso Campanella: Filosofo della restaurazione cattolica. Padua.Google Scholar
Dibon, Paul (1950). ‘Notes bibliographiques sur les cartésiens hollandais’, in Dijksterhuis, et al. 1950.Google Scholar
Dibon, Paul (1954). La Philosophie néerlandaise au siècle d'or: Tome I, L'Enseignement philosophique dans les universités à I'époque précartésienne (1575–1650). Paris: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Diesselhorst, Malte (1959). Die Lehre des Hugo Grotius von Versprechen. Cologne and Graz: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Diesselhorst, Malte (1976). Zun Vermögensrechtssystem Samuel Pufendorfs. Göttingen: Schwartz.Google Scholar
Diethelm, Oskar (1971). Medical Dissertations of Psychiatric Interest Printed Before 1750. New York: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm Sir (1638). A Conference with a Lady about Choyce of Religion. Paris.Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm Sir (1643). Observations upon Religio Medici. London.Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm Sir (1644a). Two Treatises. In the one of which, the Nature of Bodies; in the other, the Nature of Mans Soule; Is Looked into: In the Way of Discovery, of the Immortality of Reasonable Soules. Paris. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1978.)Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm Sir (1644b). Observations upon Religio Medici… The second Edition Corrected and Amended. London. (Repr. Menston: Scolar Press, 1973.)Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm Sir (1645). Two Treatises…. London.Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm Sir (1658a). Discours fait en une célèbre assemblée, par le Chevalier Digby… touchant la guérison des playes par la poudre de sympathie. Paris.Google Scholar
Digby, Kenelm Sir (1658b). A Late Discourse Made in a Solemne Assembly of Nobles and Learned Men of Montpellier in France by Sr. Kenelme Digby, Knight, &c., Touching the Cure of Wounds by the Powder of Sympathy, with Instructions How to Make the Said Powder, Whereby Many Other Secrets of Nature Are Unfolded. London.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, E. J. (1961). The Mechanization of the World Picture, trans. Dikshoorn, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, E. J., et al. (1950). Descartes et le cartésianisme hollandais. Etudes et documents. Paris and Amsterdam: Presses Universitaires de France and Editions Françaises d'Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Diogenes, Laertius (1688). The Lives, Opinions, and Remarkable Sayings of the Most Famous Ancient Philosophers. London.Google Scholar
Diogenes, Laertius (1925). Lives of Eminent Philosophers, trans. Hicks, R. D. (2 vols., Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter (1971). ‘Studies in the Natural Philosophy of Sir Kenelm Digby, Part I’, Ambix. 18:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter (1973). ‘Studies in the Natural Philosophy of Sir Kenelm Digby, Part II, Digby and Alchemy’, Ambix. 20:.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter (1974). ‘Studies in the Natural Philosophy of Sir Kenelm Digby, Part III, Digby's Experimental Alchemy – the Book of Secrets’, Ambix. 21:.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter (1975). The Foundations of Newton's Alchemy, or ‘The Hunting of the Greene Lyon’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter (1982). ‘Newton's Alchemy and His Theory of Matter’, Isis. 73:.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter (1985). ‘Conceptual Problems in Newton's Early Chemistry: A Preliminary Study’, in Osler, M. J. and Farber, P. L. (eds.), Religion, Science, and Worldview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter (1988). ‘Alchemy’, in Scheurer, P. B. and Debrock, G. (eds.), Newton's Scientific and Philosophical Legacy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter (1991). The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton's Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Documents Relating to the University and Colleges of Cambridge (3 vols.) (1852). London.
Dod, Bernard G. (1982). ‘Aristoteles latinus’, in Pinborg, Kretzmann, and , Kenny 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domat, Jean (1691–7). Les Loix civiles dans leur ordre naturel. 2d ed. (3 vols.), Paris.Google Scholar
Dominicy, M. (1984). La naissance de la grammaire moderne: Langage, logique et philosophie à Port-Royal. Brussels: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Donagan, Alan (1973). ‘Spinoza's Proof of Immortality’, in Grene, M. (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Donagan, Alan (1982). ‘Thomas Aquinas on Human Action’, in Kenny, Kretzmann, and , Pinborg 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donagan, Alan (1988). Spinoza. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Walter (1610). Moralis disciplinae summa, ex decem libris Aristotelis ad Nicomachum desumpta, ac duodecim disputationibus in illustri Academia Sedanensi propositis …comprehensa. Hanau.Google Scholar
Doney, Willis (1955). ‘The Cartesian Circle’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 16:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donne, John (1952). Essays in Divinity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doren, A. (1922–3). ‘Fortuna im Mittelalter und in der Renaissance’, Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg. 2:.Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef (1988). ‘Samuel Pufendorf (1632–1694) und die Leipziger Gelehrtengesellschaften in der Mitte des 17. Jahrhunderts’, Lias. 15:.Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef (1992). Pufendorf-Studien. Beiträge zur Biographie Samuel von Pufendorfs und seiner Entwicklung als Historiker und theologischer Schriftsteller. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, Stillman (1975). ‘Free Fall from Albert of Saxony to Honoré Fabri’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 5:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, Stillman (1978). Galileo at Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Drake, Stillman, and Drabkin, I. E. (eds.) (1969). Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy. Selections from Tartaglia, Benedetti, Guido Ubaldo, & Galileo (University of Wisconsin Publications in Medieval Science). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Dryden, John (1900). The Essays, ed. Ker, W. P. (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryden, John (1958). The Poems, ed. Kinsley, James (4 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Du Hamel, Jean (1692). Reflexions critiques sin le systèms cartésien de la philosophie de Mr Regis. Paris.Google Scholar
Du Hamel, Jean (1699). Lettre de Monsieur Du Hamel, ancien professeur de philosophie de l'Université de Paris, pour servir de replique à Monsieur Régis. Paris.Google Scholar
Du Hamel, Jean (1705). Philosophia universalis, sive commentarius in universant Aristotelis philosophiam ad usum scholarum comparatam quaedam recentiorum philosphorum ac praesertim Cartesii propositiones damnatae ac prohibitae. Paris.Google Scholar
Du Hamel, Jean-Baptiste (1663). De consensu veteris et novae philosophiae. Paris.Google Scholar
Du Hamel, Jean-Baptiste (1672). De mente humana. Paris.Google Scholar
Du Hamel, Jean-Baptiste (1678). Philosophia vetus et nova ad usu, scholae accomodata. Paris.Google Scholar
Du Rondel, Jacques (1679). La Vie d'Epicure. Paris.Google Scholar
Du Trieu, Philippe (1826). Manuductio ad logicam. London. (Ist ed. 1614.)Google Scholar
Du Vair, Guillaume (1946). De la sainte philosophie. La Philosophie morale des stoïques, ed. Michaut, G.. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Dubarle, D. (1986). Dieu avec l'être. De Parménide à Saint Thomas. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François (1973). L'empirisme de Locke (International Archives of the History of Ideas, 57). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Duchesneau, François (1994). La dynamique de Leibniz. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Dufour, Alfred (1976). Le mariage dans l'école romande du droit naturel au XVIIIe siècle. Geneva: Georg.Google Scholar
Dufour, Alfred (1986). ‘Pufendorfs Ausstrahlung im franzözischen und im anglo-amerikanischen Kulturraum’, in Modéer, K. Å. (ed.), Samuel von Pufendorf 1632–1982. Stockholm: Nordiska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Dugas, René (1957). A history of mechanics, trans. Maddox, J. R., pref. Broglie, Louis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Dugas, René (1958). Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century, trans. Jacquot, Freda. Neuchâtel: Editions de Griffon.Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre (1913–59). Le système du monde: Histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon au Copernic (10 vols.). Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Duhem, Pierre (1985). Medieval Cosmology: Theories of Infinity, Place, Time, Void and the Plurality of Worlds, ed. and trans. Ariew, Roger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, David Allen (1993). ‘Mersenne and Modern Learning: The Debate over Music’, in Sorrel, Tom (ed.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, John (1969). The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John (1980). Political Obligation in Its Historical Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John (1984). John Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DunneGeorge, S. J. George, S. J. (1962). Generation of Giants: The Story of the Jesuits in China in the Last Decades of the Ming Dynasty. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, John (1639). Opera Omnia, ed. Wadding, L. (12 vols. in 16). Lyon. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1968).Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, John (1891–95). Opera omnia, ed. Wadding, L. (26 vols). Paris: Vives.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, John (1950–). Opera omnia. Vatican City: Typis Polyglottis Vaticana.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, John (1968). Cuestiones Cuodlibetales, ed. and trans. (, Latin with , Spanish trans.) F. Alluntis. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, John (1975). God and Creatures. The Quodlibetal Questions, ed. & trans. Alluntis, F. and Wolter, A. B.. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, John (1987). Philosophical Writings, ed. and trans. Wolter, Allan. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, John (1988). Sur la connaissance de Dieu et l'univocité de l'étant. ed. Boulnois, O.. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Dupaquier, Jacques (1973). ‘Sur une table (prétendument) florentine d'espérance de vie’, Annales: Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations. 23:.Google Scholar
Dupleix, Scipion (1606). La curiosité naturelle redigée en questions, selon l'ordre alphabetique. Paris.Google Scholar
Dupleix, Scipion (1610). L'Ethique ou Philosophie morale. Paris.Google Scholar
Dupleix, Scipion (1623). Corps de philosophie, contenant la logique, l'ethique, La physique, et la metaphysique. Geneva.Google Scholar
Dupleix, Scipion (1627). Corps de philosophie, contenant la logique, l'ethique, La physique, et la metaphysique. Geneva.Google Scholar
Dupleix, Scipion (1990). La physique. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Dupleix, Scipion (1991). La Métaphysique. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Duplessis-Mornay, Philippe (1581). De la vérité de la religion chrétienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Durandus a Sancto Porciano (1571). In Petri Lombardi Sententias theologicas commentariorum libri IIIl. Venice.
Durkheim, Emile (1968). Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse: Le Système totémique en Australie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Dury, John (1643). A Copy of Mr. J.D.'s Letter Presented in Sweden to the …Lord Forbes …London.Google Scholar
Dury, John (1649). A Seasonable Discourse … on How Even in These Times of Distraction, the Work May Be Advanced by the Knowledge of Oriental Tongues and Jewish Mysteries. London.Google Scholar
Dury, John (1650). The Reformed Librarie-Keeper. London. (Repr. intro. Popkin, R. H. and Wright, Thomas. Los Angeles: Clarke Library and University of California (Augustan Reprint Society).)Google Scholar
Echarri, J. (1950). ‘Uno influjo español desconcido en la formación del sistema cartesiano; dos textos paralelos de Toledo y Descartes sobre el espacio’, El Pensamiento. 6:.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. S. (1981). Hugo Grotius. The Miracle of Holland. A Study in Political and Legal Thought. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Edwards, John (1697). The Socinian Creeds: Or a Brief Account of the Professed Tenets and Doctrines of the Foreign and English Socinians …. London.Google Scholar
Edwards, Paul (ed.) (1967). The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (8 vols.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Edwards, Thomas (1646). Gangraena: Or a Catalogue and Discovery of Many of the Errours, Heresies, Blasphemies, and Pernicious Practices of the Sectaries of This Time …. London.Google Scholar
Edwards, William F. (1967). ‘Randall on the Development of Scientific Method in the School of Padue – A Continuing Reappraisal’, in Anton, John P. (ed.), Naturalism and Historical Understanding: Essays on the Philosophy of John Herman Randall, Jr. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, William F. (1976). ‘Niccolò Leoniceno and the Origins of Humanist Discussion of Method’, in Mahoney, Edward P. (ed.), Philosophy and Humanism: Renaissance Essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, William F. (1983). ‘Paduan Aristotelianism and the Origins of Modern Theories of Method’, in Olivieri, Luigi (ed.), Aristotelismo veneto e scienza moderna (2 vols.). Padua: Editrice Antenore.Google Scholar
Eichel von Rautenkorn, Johannes (1654). Programma quo ad publicam disputationem operis Nicomachici de moribus civilis sapientiae cultores invitat in illustri Academia Iulia … J. Erichelius. Helmstedt.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Paul (1990). ‘On the Attributes and their Alleged Independence of One Another: A Commentary on Spinoza's Ethics IP10’, in , Curley and , Moreau 1990.Google Scholar
Eisler, Rudolph (1910). Wörterbuch der philosophischen Begriffe. 3d ed. (3 vols.). Berlin: Mittler.Google Scholar
Elzinga, Aant (1972). On a Research Program in Early Modern Physics. Göteborg: Akademiförlaget.Google Scholar
Elzinga, Aant (1980). ‘Christiaan Huygens' Theory of Research’, Janus, 67:.Google Scholar
Emerton, Norma E. (1984). The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Englebretsen, G. (1982). ‘Leibniz on Logical Syntax’, Studia Leibnitiana. 14:.Google Scholar
Epictetus, (1610). His Manual …, trans. , John Healey. London.Google Scholar
Epictetus, (1688). Le Manuel …avec des réflexions tirées de la morale de l'Evangile, ed. Coquelin, Nicolas. Paris.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius (1969–). Opera Omnia, ed. Waszink, J. H. et al. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius (1974–). Collected Works of Erasmus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius (1979). The Praise of Folly, trans. Miller, Clarence H.. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Erle, Manfred (1952). Die Ehe im Naturrecht des 17. Jahrhunderts. Göttingen. diss. University of Göttingen.Google Scholar
Ermini, Giuseppe (1947). Storia dell Universita di Perugia. Bologna: N. Zachelli.Google Scholar
Esmein, A. (1882). Histoire de la procédure criminelle en France. Paris: Larose et Forcel.Google Scholar
Ettinghausen, Henry (1972). Francisco de Quevedo and the Neostoic Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Euchner, W. (1979). Naturrecht und Politik bei John Locke. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Euler, Leonhard (1959). Vollständige Anleitung zur Algebra (St. Petersburg, 1770), ed. Hofmann, J. E.. Stuttgart: Reclam-Verlag.Google Scholar
Eustachius a Sancto Paulo (1609). Summa philosophiae quadripartita, de rebus Dialecticis, Ethicis, Physicis, & Metaphysicis. Paris.
Eustachius a Sancto Paulo (1613–16). Summa theologiae tripartita. Paris.
Eustachius a Sancto Paulo (1629). Summa philosophiae quadripartita, de rebus Dialecticis, Ethicis, Physicis, & Metaphysicis. Cologne.
Eustachius a Sancto Paulo (1638). Summa philosophiae quadripartita, de rebus Dialecticis, Ethicis, Physicis, & Metaphysicis. Cologne and Geneva.
Eustachius a Sancto Paulo (1648). Summa philosophiae quadripartita, de rebus Dialecticis, Ethicis, Physicis, & Metaphysicis. Cambridge.
Eustachius a Sancto Paulo (1654). Ethica sive Summa moralis disciplinae …. Cambridge.
Eustratius, (1892). In Ethica Nicomachea commentaria, ed. Heylbut, G.. Berlin: G. Reimerus.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. W. (1981). ‘German Universities after the Thirty Years War’, History of Universities. 1:.Google Scholar
Evelyn, John (1656). Essay on the First Book of T. Lucretius Carus, De rerum natura. London.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (ed.) (1990). Companions to Ancient Thought 1: Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ewin, R. E. (1991). Virtues and Rights. The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Boulder, Colo., San Francisco, Calif., Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Fabri, Honoré (1646a) [ed. Mousnier, Pierre]. Tractatus physicus de motu locali, in quo effectus omnes, qui ad impetum, motum naturalem, violentum, & mixtum pertinent, explicantur, & ex principiis physicis demonstrantur. Auctore Petro Mousnerio Doctore Medico; cuncta excerpta ex praelectionibus R. P. Honorati Fabry, Societatis Jesu. Lyon.Google Scholar
Fabri, Honoré (1646b). Philosophiae tomus primus. Lyon.Google Scholar
Fabri, Honoré (1669–71). Physica, id est, scientia rerum corporearum, in decem tractatus distributa. Lyon.Google Scholar
Fabro, C. (1964). Introduzione all'ateismo moderno. 2d ed. Rome: Editrice Studium.Google Scholar
Fardella, Michelangelo (1691). Universae philosophiae systema in quo nova quadam et extricata methodo naturalis scientiae et moralis fundamenta explanantur, tomus primus, rationalis et emendatae dialecticae specimen tradens, cui accedit appendix de triplici scholarum sophismate detecto et rejecto, opus in lironum gratiam elucubratum. Venice.Google Scholar
Farr, James (1987). ‘The Way of Hypotheses: Locke on Method’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 48:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, Benjamin (1964). The Philosophy of Francis Bacon: An Essay on Its Development from 1603 to 1609, with New Translations of Fundamental Texts. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Faye, E. (1986). ‘Le corps de philosophie de Scipion Dupleix et l'arbre cartésien des sciences’, Corpus. 2:.Google Scholar
Febvre, Lucien (1982). The Problem of Unbelief in the Sixteenth Century: The Religion of Rabelais, trans. Gottlieb, Beatrice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Feenstra, R. (1984). ‘Quelques remarques sur les sources utilisées par Grotius dans ses travaux de droit natural’, in The World of Hugo Grotius (1583–1645), Proceedings of the International Colloquium Organized by the Grotius Committee of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Rotterdam 6–9 April 1983. Amsterdam and Maarssen: APA-Holland University Press.Google Scholar
Feingold, Mordechai (1984a). The Mathematicians' Apprenticeship: Science, Universities, and Society in England, 1560–1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feingold, Mordechai (1984b). ‘The Occult Tradition in the English Universities of the Renaissance: A Reassessment’, in Vickers, Brian (ed.), Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Felgenhauer, Paul (1655). Bonum Nuncium Israeli. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fénelon, François (1712). Démonstration de l'existence de Dieu, Tirée de la conoissance de la Nature et proportionée à la faible intelligence des plus simples. Paris.Google Scholar
Fénelon, François (1713). Démonstration de l'existence de Dieu …. Paris.Google Scholar
Fénelon, François (1718). Démonstration de l'existence de Dieu …. Paris.Google Scholar
Fénelon, François (1731). Démonstration de l'existence de Dieu …. Paris.Google Scholar
Fénelon, François (1820–30). Oeuvres de Fénelon, ed. Gosselin, J. E. M. and Caron, A. (35 vols.). Versailles.Google Scholar
Fénelon, François (1848–52). Oeuvres complètes de Fénelon (10 vols.). Paris: Leroux-Gaume.Google Scholar
Fénelon, François (1854). Oeuvres de Fénelon, ed. Vivès, L. (8 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Fénelon, François (1972–). Correspondance de Fénelon, ed. Orcibal, J.. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Fénelon, François (1990). Traité de l'existence de Dieu, ed. Dumas, J.-L.. Paris: Editions Universitaires.Google Scholar
Fermat, Pierre (1679). Varia opera mathematica. Toulouse.Google Scholar
Fermat, Pierre (1891–1922). Oeuvres de Fermat, ed. Henry, C. and Tannery, P. (4 vols.) with suppl. by Waard, C. (vol. 5.) Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Ferniano, Salvatore (1968). La metafisica di Tommaso Campanella. Milan: Marzorati.Google Scholar
Ferniano, Salvatore (1969). ‘L'antiaristotelismo essenziale di Tommaso Campanella’, in Tommaso Campanella nel IV centenario della sua nascita (1568–1968). Naples: EDI-Sapienza.Google Scholar
Ferrier, F. (1978). Un Oratorien ami de Descartes: Guillaume Gibieuf. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. J. (1983). La Révélation d'Hermès Trismégiste. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. (1970). ‘Classical Empiricism’, in Butts, Robert E. and Davis, John W. (eds.), The Methodological Heritage of Newton. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fichant, Michel (1974). ‘La “réforme” leibnizienne de la dynamique, d'après des textes inédits’, in Akten des II. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses, Hannover, 17–22 Juli 1972: Wissenschaftstheorie und Wissenschaftsgeschichte (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa). Stuttgart: Steiner, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Fichant, Michel (1978). ‘Les concepts fondamentaux de la mécanique selon Leibniz, en 1676’, in Leibniz à Paris (1672–1676), Symposium de la G-W Leibniz-Gesellschaft (Hannover) et du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Paris) à Chantilly (France) du 14 au 18 novembre 1976 (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa). Stuttgart: Steiner, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Fichant, Michel (1992). ‘L'appropriarion des preuves: le cas du De corporum concursu de Leibniz’, in Les procédures de preuve sous le regard de l'historien des sciences et des techniques. Paris: Société Française d'Histoire des Sciences et des Techniques.Google Scholar
Fichant, Michel (1993). ‘Leibniz lecteur de Mariotte’, Revue d'Histoire des Sciences. 46:.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio (1576). Opera Omnia (2 vols.). Basil. (Repr. Torino: Bottego d'Erasmo, 1959.)Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio (1964). Théologie platonicienne de l'immortalité des âmes, ed. and trans. (French) Marcel, Raymond (3 vols.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio (1975). The Philebus Commentary, ed. and trans. Allen, Michael J. B.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio (1981). Marsilio Ficino and the Phaedran Charioteer, ed. and trans. Allen, M. J. B.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio (1989). Three Books on Life: A Critical Edition and Translation with Introduction and Notes, ed. and trans. Kaske, C. V. and Clark, J. R.. Binghamton, N.Y.: MRTS.Google Scholar
Fiering, Norman (1981). Moral Philosophy at Seventeenth-Century Harvard. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Firpo, Luigi (1940). Bibliografia degli Scritti di Tommaso Campanella. Torino: Vincenzo Bona.Google Scholar
Firth, Katherine R. (1979). The Apocalyptic Tradition in Reformation Britain 1530–1645. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kuno (1889). Ceschichte der neuern Philosophic I. 3d ed. Munich-Heidelberg: Bassermann-Winter.Google Scholar
Fisher, Samuel (1679). The Testimony of Truth Exalted. London.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Edward A. (ed.) (1933). St. Ignatius and the Ratio Studiorum. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, P. J. (1987). ‘Some Seventeenth-Century Disagreements and Transubstantiation’, in Davies, B. (ed.), Language, Meaning and God: Essays in Honour of Herbert McCabe O.P.London: Chapman.Google Scholar
Fleischmann, Wolfgang Bernard (1964). Lucretius and English Literature 1680–1740. Paris: A. Nizet.Google Scholar
Fleitmann, Sabina (1986). Walter Charleton (1620–1707), “Virtuoso”: Leben und Werk. Frankfurt am Main etc.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Flemyng, Malcolm (1751). A New Critical Examination of an Important Passage in Mr. Locke's Essay on Human Understanding. London.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Harris Francis (1956–61). The Intellectual Development of John Milton (2 vols.). Urbana, III.: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. M. (1981). ‘Change and Resistance to Change: A Consideration of the Development of English and German Universities during the Sixteenth Century’, History of Universities. 1:.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. M. (1986). ‘The Faculty of Arts’, in McConica, J. K. (ed.), History of the University of Oxford: vol. 3, The Collegiate University Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flew, A. (1968). ‘Locke and the Problem of Personal Identity’, in Martin, C. B. and Armstrong, D. M. (eds.), Locke and Berkeley: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday..Google Scholar
Fludd, Robert (1617–21). Utriusque cosmi mairoris scilicet minoris metaphysica, physica atque technica historia. Oppenheim and Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Fludd, Robert (1621). Veritatis proscaenium … seu demonstratio quaedam analytica. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Fludd, Robert (1629). Sophiae cum moria certamen, in quo lapis Lydius afalso structore, Fr. Marino Mersenne monacho, reprobatus celeberrima voluminis sui Babylonia (in Genesin) figmenta accurate examinat. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Fludd, Robert (1633). Clavis philosophiae et alchymiae Fluddanae sive Roberti Fluddi … ad epistolicam Petri Gassendi theologi exercitationem responsum, in quo inanes Marini Mersenni monachi objectiones … examinantur. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Fludd, Robert (1638). Philosophia Moysaica. Gouda.Google Scholar
Fludd, Robert (1659). Mosaicall Philosophy, Grounded upon the Essential Truth or Eternal Sapience, Written First in Latin and Afterwards Thus Rendered into English [by the author]. London.Google Scholar
Fonblanque, E. (1887). Annals of the House of Percy from the Conquest to the Opening of the Nineteenth Century (2 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Fonseca, Pedro da (1615). Commentarium in metaphysicomm Aristotelis Stagiritae libros tomi quatuor. Cologne. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1964.)Google Scholar
Fontenelle, Bernard de le Bovier (1683–4). Nouveaux dialogues des marts. Paris.Google Scholar
Fontenelle, Bernard de le Bovier (1686). Entretiens sur la pluralité des monies. Paris and Lyon.Google Scholar
Fontenelle, Bernard de le Bovier (1725). Histoire de l'Académie Royale des Sciences [1700]. Paris.Google Scholar
Fontenelle, Bernard de le Bovier (1727). Eléments de la géométrie de l'infini. Paris.Google Scholar
Fontenelle, Bernard de le Bovier (1746). ‘Eloge de M. Bernoulli’, in Histoire de l'Académie royale des Sciences, 1703. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fontenelle, Bernard [de] le Bovier (1825). Oeuvres de Fontenelle, ed. Depping, G. (5 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Fontenelle, Bernard de le Bovier (1955). Entretiens sur la pluralité des mondes ed. Shackleton, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fontialis, J. (1740). Opera Posthuma. Namur. (Repr. Hildesheim 1989.)Google Scholar
Forbes, D. (1975). Hume's Philosophical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forbes, D. (1982). ‘Natural law and the Scottish Enlightenment’, in Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S. (eds.), The Origins and Nature of the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: J. Donald.Google Scholar
Force, James E. (1985). William Whiston, Honest Newtonian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foss, Kåre (1934). Ludvig Holbergs Naturrett på Idéhistorisk Bakgrunn. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1966). Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1972). L'Histoire de la folie. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucher de Careil, Alexandre-Louis (1861). Leibniz, la philosophie juive et la Cabale. Paris.Google Scholar
Foucher, Simon (1675). Critique de la Recherche de la vérité, où l'on examine en même-tems une partie des principes de Mr Descartes. Lettre, par un academicien. Paris. (Repr. New York: Johnson, 1969.)Google Scholar
Foucher, Simon (1676). Réponse pour la critique à la préface du second volume de la recherche de la vérité. Paris.Google Scholar
Foucher, Simon (1679). Nouvelle Dissertation sur la Recherche de la vérité, contenant la réponse à la critique de la critique de la Recherche de la Verité, où l'on découvre les erreurs des dogmatistes, tant anciens que nouveaux, avec une discution particuliere du grand principe des cartésiens. Paris.Google Scholar
Fowden, Garth (1993). The Egyptian Hermes: An Historical Approach to the Late Pagan Mind. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Christopher (1988). Locke and the Scriblerians. Identity and Consciousness in Early Eighteenth-Century Britain. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Franco, Luigi (1969). ‘La Philosophia Sensibus Demonstrata di Tommaso Campanella e la dottrina di Bernardino Telesio’, in Tommaso Campanella (1568–1639): Miscellanea di studi nel 40 centenario delta sua nascita. Naples: Fausto Fiorentino.Google Scholar
François de Sales, Saint (1613). An Introduction to a Devoute Life, trans. Yakesley, J.. Douai.Google Scholar
François de Sales, Saint (1892–1964). Oeuvres de Saint François de Sales, ed. Mackey-Navratel, (27 vols.). Annecy: J. Niérat.Google Scholar
François de Sales, Saint (1969). Oeuvres, ed. Ravier, A. and Devos, R.. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
François de Sales, Saint (1971). A Treatise on the Love of God, trans. Mackey, H. B., vol. 2 of Works of St. Francis de Sales. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood.Google Scholar
FrançoisJean, S. J. Jean, S. J. (1655). Traité de la quantité considerée absolument et en elle mesme, relativement et en ses rapports, materiellement et en ses plus nobles sujets. Pour servir d'introduction aux sciences et arts mathematiques, & aux disputes philosophiques de la quantité. Rennes.Google Scholar
Frankel, Lois (1981). ‘Leibniz's Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles’, Studia Leibnitiana. 13:.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry (1962). ‘Memory and the Cartesian Circle’, Philosophical Review. 71:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry (1966). ‘Descartes' Discussion of His Existence in the Second Meditation’, Philosophical Review. 75:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry (1967). ‘Descartes' Validation of Reason’ in Doney, W. (ed.), Descartes: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry (1970). Demons, Dreamers and Madmen: The Defense of Reason in Descartes'Meditations. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merill.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry (1977). ‘Descartes on the Creation of Eternal Truths’, Philosophical Review. 86:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry (1978). ‘Descartes on the Consistency of Reason’, in Hooker, Michael (ed.), Descartes: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Frassen, Claude (1686). Philosophia academica, quam ex selectissimis Aristotelis et Doctoris subtilis Scoti rationibus ac sententiis … 3d ed. (4 vols. in 2). Toulouse.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael (1987). ‘The Sceptic's Beliefs’, in Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael (1990). ‘An Empiricist View of Knowledge’, in Everson 1990.Google Scholar
Freedman, Joseph S. (1985). Deutsche Schulphilosophie im Reformationszeitalter (1500–1650) (Arbeiten zur Klassifkation). Münster: MAKS Publikationen.Google Scholar
Freedman, Joseph S. (1988). European Academic Philosophy in the Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries: The Life, Significance, and Philosophy of Clemens Timpler (1563/4–1624) (2 vols.). Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Fremont, Chrisriane (1981). L'être et la relation. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gad (1983). ‘Theory of Matter and Cosmology in William Gilbert's De magnete’, Isis. 74:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, J.-C. (1633). Universae philosophise compendium. Paris.Google Scholar
Friedensburg, Walter (1926–7). Urkundenbuch der Vniversitat Wittenberg (2 vols.). Magdeburg: Historische Kommission für die Provinz Sachsen.Google Scholar
Friedman, Joel (1977). ‘Spinoza's Denial of Free Will in Man and God’, in Wetlesen, Jon (ed.), Spinoza's Philosophy of Man. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Manfred (1979). ‘Persona, ein Römischer Rollenbegriff’, in Marquard, Odo and Stierle, Karlheinz (eds.), Identität. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, A. (1980). ‘Descartes, Eternal Truths and Divine Omnipotence’, in Gaukroger, Stephen (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos (1986). Theology and the Scientific Imagination from the Middle Ages to the Seventeenth Century. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Furlan, A. (1974). ‘Logic according to Spinoza’, in Bend, J. G. der (ed.), Spinoza on Knowing, Being and Freedom. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1970). ‘Les trois genres de découverte selon Descartes’, in Actes du XIIe Congrès International d'Histoire des Sciences, Paris 1968. Paris, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1973). Review of Scott, W. L., The Conflict between Atomism and Conservation Theory 1644–1860 (1970), Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 4:.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1977). ‘Anne Conway et Henry More, Lettres sur Descartes’, Archives de philosophie. 40:.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1980a). ‘Force and Inertia in the Seventeenth Century: Descartes and Newton’, in Gaukroger 1980.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1980b). ‘Huygens and Mechanics’, in Bos, H. J. M. et al. (eds.), Studies on Christiaan Huygens. Invited papers from the Symposium on the life and work of Christiaan Huygens, Amsterdam, 22–5 August 1979. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1982). ‘Philosophia Cartesiana Triumphata: Henry More (1646–1671)’, in Lennon, T. M., Nicholas, J. M., and Davis, J. W. (eds.), Problems of Cartesianism. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1985). ‘The Mechanical Philosophy and Its Problems: Mechanical Explanations, Impenetrability, and Perpetual Morion’, in Pitt, J. C. (ed.), Change and Progress in Modern Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1990a). ‘Newton and natural philosophy’, in Olby, R. C., Cantor, G. N., Christie, J. R. R., and Hodge, M. J. S. (eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1990b). ‘Henry More and the Limits of Mechanism’, in Hutton, S. (ed.), Henry More. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1990c). ‘Explanatory Structures and Mode in Descartes's Physics’, in Belgioioso, G. et al. (eds.), Descartes: Il metodo e i saggi. Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1990d). ‘The Case of Mechanics: One Revolution or Many?’, in Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. Lindberg, David C. and Westman, Robert S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chap. 13.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1992). ‘Newton's “Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy”: A Treatise on “Mechanics”?’, in The Investigation of Difficult Things, ed. Harman, P. M. and , Alan Shapiro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan (1996). ‘Spinoza's Natural Science and Methology’, in Garrett, D., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gale, George (1973). ‘Leibniz's Dynamical Metaphysics and the Origins of the Vis Viva Controversy’, Systematics. 11:.Google Scholar
Galen, (1979). On the Natural Faculties, trans. Brock, Arthur John (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo (1623). Il Saggiatore. Rome.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo (1632). Dialogo sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo. Florence.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo (1638). Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno à due nuove scienze. Leiden.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo (1890–1909). Opere, ed. Favaro, A. (20 vols.). Florence: Barbera. (Reissued 1929–39, 1965.)Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo (1957). The Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, ed. , S. Drake. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo (1960a). The Controversy on the Comets of 1618: Galileo Galilei, Horatio Grassi, Mario Guiducci, Johann Kepler. Trans. Drake, S. and O'Malley, C. D.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo (1960b). On Motion and On Mechanics, trans. Drabkin, I. E. and Drake, S.. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo (1967). Dialogue concerning the Two Chief World Systems, trans. , Stillman Drake. 2d ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo (1969). Opere, ed. Pachi, Arrigo (2 vols.). Napoli: Fulvio Rossi.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo (1974). Two New Sciences. Including Centers of Gravity & Force of Percussion, trans, with introduction and notes by Drake, Stillman. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, David (1991). ‘Thomas Aquinas on the Will as Rational Appetite’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 29:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, Roger (1987). ‘The Same Self’, Locke Newsletter. 18:.Google Scholar
Gallie, Roger (1989). Thomas Reid and ‘The Way of Ideas’. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galluzzi, Paolo (1973). ‘Il “Platonismo” del tardo Cinquencento e la filosofia di Galileo’, in Zambelli, Paola (ed.), Ricerche sulla cultura dell'Italia moderna. Bari: Editore Laterza.Google Scholar
Galluzzi, Paolo (1979). Momento: Studi galileiani (Lessico Intellettuale Europeo, no. 19). Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateneo & Bizzarri.Google Scholar
Galluzzi, Tarquinio (1632–45). In Aristotelis libros … moralium ad Nicomachum nova interpretatio, commentaria, quaestiones (2 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Garasse, François (1623). La doctrine curieuse des beaux esprits de ce temps ou prétendus tels. Paris.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1982). ‘Motion and Metaphysics in the Young Leibniz’, in Hooker, Michael (ed.), Leibniz: Critical and Interpretative Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1983a). ‘Understanding Interaction: What Descartes Should Have Told Elisabeth’, Southern Journal of Philosophy. 21 supp.:.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1983b). ‘Mind, Body, and the Laws of Nature in Descartes and Leibniz’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy. 8:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1985). ‘Leibniz and the Foundations of Physics: The Middle Years’, in Okruhlik, K. and Brown, J. R. (eds.), The Natural Philosophy of Leibniz. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1986). ‘Semel in vita: The Scientific Background to Descartes' Meditations’, in Rorty 1986a.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1987a). ‘How God Causes Motion: Descartes, Divine Sustenance, and Occasionalism’, Journal of Philosophy. 84:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1987b). ‘La méthode du Discours’, in Marion, Jean-Luc and Grimaldi, Nicolas (eds.), Le Discours et sa méthode. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1992a). Descartes' Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1992b). ‘Descartes' physics’, in Cottingham, J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1993a). ‘Descartes and Occasionalism’, in Nadler, S. (ed.), Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1993b). ‘Descartes and Experiment in the Discourse and Essays’, in Voss 1993.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1995). ‘Leibniz: Physics and Philosophy’, in Jolley, N. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel, and Zabell, Sandy (1979). ‘On the Emergence of Probability’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 21:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardeil, H. D. (1956). Introduction to the Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas, trans. Otto, J. A. (4 vols.). St. Louis: B. Herder.Google Scholar
Gargani, Aldo G. (1971). Hobbes e la scienza. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio (1937). Giovanni Pico della Mirandola: Vita e dottrina. Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio (1954). Medioevo e rinascimento. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio (1983). Astrology in the Renaissance: The Zodiac of Life, trans. , C. Jackson, Allen, J., and Robertson, C.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garin, P. (1932). Thèses cartésiennes et thèses thomistes. Bruges: Desclée, De Brouwer.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brian (1990). ‘Persons and Human Beings’, Logos, Philosophic Issues in Christian Perspective. 11:.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don (1991). ‘Spinoza's Necessitarianism’, in Yovel, Yirmiyahu (ed.), God and Nature: Spinoza's Metaphysics. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Garrigou-LaGrange, Reginald (1946). God: His Existence and His Nature, trans. Rose, Dom Bede from the 5th French ed. (2 vols.). St Louis: Herder.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Philip (1972). A New Introduction to Bibliography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre (1624). Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos (part 1). Grenoble.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre (1642a). De motu impresso a motore translato epistolae duae. Paris.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre (1644). Disquisitio metaphysica. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre (1647). De vita et moribus Epicuri libri octo. Lyon.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre (1649). Animadversiones in decimum librum Diogenis Laertii (2 vols.). Lyon. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1987.)Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre (1658). Opera omnia (6 vols.). Lyon. (Repr. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1964.)Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre (1727). Opera omnia in sex tomos divisa. Florence.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre (1959). Exercitaliones Paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos, ed. and trans. [French] Rochot, Bernard. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre (1962). Disquisitio Metaphysica, ed. and trans. [French] Rochot, B.. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre (1972). Selected Works, ed. and trans. Brush, C. B.. New York: Johnson Reprint.Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pierre (1981). Pierre Gassendi's Institutio logica (1658), ed. and trans. Jones, Howard. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Gastaldi, Sylvia (1987). ‘Pathe and Polis: Aristotle's Theory of Passions in the Rhetoric and the Ethics’, Topoi. 6:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen (1978). Explanatory Structures: A Study of concepts of Explanation in Early Physics and Philosophy. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen (1980b). ‘Descartes' Project for a Mathematical Physics’, in Gaukroger 1980a.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen (1989). Cartesian Logic. An Essay on Descartes's Conception of Inference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen (ed.) (1991). The Uses of Antiquity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen (1995). Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. (ed.) (1980a). Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics. Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Gaultruche, Pierre (1665). Philosophiae ac mathematicae totius clara, brevis, et accurata institutio (6 vols.). Caen.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David P. (1969). The Logic of Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David P. (1977). ‘Why Ought One to Obey God? Reflections on Hobbes and Locke’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 7:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, René Antoine (1970). Aristote: L'Ethique à Nicomaque. Introduction. Louvain and Paris: Publications universitaires and Béatrice-Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Geier, Johannes Christianus (1683). Dissertatio ethica de mediocritate virtutis moralis, … praeside … Jacobo Thomasio …Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gerdil, H. S. (1747). L'Immaterialité de l'âme demontrée contre M. Locke, par les Mêmes Principes, par lesquels ce Philosophe démontre l'Existence et l'Immatérialité de Dieu, et de l'âme. Turin.Google Scholar
Gerrish, B. A. (1962). Grace and Reason. A Study in the Theology of Luther. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geulincx, Arnold (1662). Logica fundamentis suis, a quibus hactenus collapse fuerat, restituta. Leiden.Google Scholar
Geulincx, Arnold (1663). Methodus inveniendi argunenta quae solertia quibusdam dicitur. Leiden.Google Scholar
Geulincx, Arnold (1665). De virtute et primis ejus proprietatibus tractatus ethicus primus. Leiden.Google Scholar
Geulincx, Arnold (1675). Ethica. Leiden.Google Scholar
Geulincx, Arnold (1891–3). Opera philosophica, ed. Land, J. P. N.. (3 vols.). The Hague: Nijhoff. (Repr. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1965.)Google Scholar
Gibieuf, Guillaume (1630). De libertate Dei et creaturae. Paris.Google Scholar
Gibson, James (1917). Locke's Theory of Knowledge and Its Historical Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Strickland (ed.) (1931). Statuta Antiqua Universitatis Oxoniensis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto Friedrich von (1958). Natural Law and the Theory of Society 1500 to 1800, trans. Barker, Ernest. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Gigante, Marcello (1988), ‘Ambrogio Traversari interprete di Diogene Laerzio’, in Garfagnini, G. C. (ed.), Ambrogio Traversari net VI centenario delta nascita. Convegno internazionale di studi (Camaldoli-Firenze … 1986). Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Neal W. (1961). Renaissance Concepts of Method. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Neal W. (1963). ‘Galileo and the School of Padua’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 1:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, William (1600). De magnete, magnetisque corporibus, et de magno magnete tellure: Physiologia nova plurimis et argumentis et experimentis demonstrata. London. (Repr. Berlin: Mayer and Müller, 1892; Brussels: Culture et Civilisation, 1967.)Google Scholar
Gilbert, William (1651). De mondo nostro sublunari nova philosophis. Amsterdam. (Repr. Amsterdam: Menno Hertzberger, 1965.)Google Scholar
Gilbert, William (1958). De magnete, trans. Fleury Mottelay, P.. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Gilead, Amihud (1983). ‘Spinoza's Principium Individuationis and Personal Identity’, International Studies in Philosophy. 15:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilen, L. (1957). ‘Über die Beziehung Descartes' zur zeitgenössischen Scholastik’, Scholastik, 22:.Google Scholar
Gilissen, John (1965). ‘La Preuve en Europe du XVIe au début du XIXe siècle. Rapport de synthèse’, in La Preuve. Deuxième Partie: Moyen Age et Temps Modemes, Reaieils de la Société Jean Bodin pour l'Histoire Comparative des Institutions. 17:.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher (1988). ‘Personhood and Personality: The Four-Personae Theory in Cicero, De Officiis l’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. 6:.Google Scholar
Gillispie, Charles Coulston (ed.) (1970–80). Dictionary of Scientific Biography (16 vols.). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1913). La liberté chez Descartes et la théologie. Paris: Alcan. (Repr., Paris: Vrin, 1982, with a foreword by Marion, J.-L..)Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1925). Discours de la méthode: texte et commentaire. Paris.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1930). Etudes sur le rôle de la pensée médievale dans la formation du système cartésien. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1941). God and Philosophy. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1945). Le Thomisme. 5th ed. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1947). L'être et l'essence. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1956). The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas, trans. Shook, L. K.. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1962). Being and Some Philosophers. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1966). ‘Postface’, in Gilson 1979.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1967a). Etudes sur le rôle de la pensée médiévale dans la formation du système cartésien. 3d ed. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1967b). Les tribulations de Sophie. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1979). Index scolastico-cartésien. 2d ed. Paris: Vrin. (1st. ed., 1913.)Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1982). La liberté chez Descartes et la théologie. 2d ed. Paris: Alean.Google Scholar
Giusberti, F. (1982). Materials for a Study of Twelfth Century Scholasticism, Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Gjertsen, Derek (1986). The Newton Handbook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph (1661). The Vanity of Dogmatizing; Or, Confidence in Opinions. London. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1970.)Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph (1662). Lux Orientalis. London.Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph (1665). Scepsis Scientifica. London. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1978; repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1985.)Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph (1666). Philosophical Considerations Touching Witches and Witchcraft. London.Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph (1668). Plus Ultra; Or, The Progress and Advancement of Knowledge since the Days of Aristotle. London. (Repr. Gainesville: Scholars' Facsimiles and Reprints.)Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph (1670). A Discourse concerning the Difficulties of the Way to Happiness, Whence They Arise and How They May Be Overcome. London.Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph (1676). Essays on Several Important Subjects in Philosophy and Religion. London. (Repr. New York: Johnson, 1970.)Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph (1681). Saducismus triumphatus, Or, Full and Plain Evidence concerning Witches and Apparitions, ed. More, Henry. London. (2d ed., London: 1682.)Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph (1682). Two Choice and Useful Treatises: The One Lux Orientalis; Or an Enquiry into the Opinion of the Eastern Sages concerning the Praeexistence of Souls. Being a Key to Unlock the Grand Mysteries of Providence. In Relation to Mans Sin and Misery. The Other, A Discourse of Truth, By the late Reverend Dr. Rust, Lord Bishop of Dromore in Ireland. With Annotations on Them Both [by Henry More]. London. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1978.)Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph (1689). Saducismus Triumphatus, 3d ed. London. (Repr. Gainesville, Florida: Scholars' Facsimiles and Reprints, 1966.)Google Scholar
Glanvill, Joseph (1970). The Vanity of Dogmatizing, ed. Medcalf, S.. Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Glisson, Francis (1672). Tractatus de natura substantiae energetica, seu de vita naturae, eiusque tribus primis facultatibus, I, perceptive naturalibus, II, appetitiva naturalibus, III, motiva naturalibus &c. London.Google Scholar
Glover, W. B. (1965). ‘God and Thomas Hobbes’ in Brown, K. C. (ed.), Hobbes Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goclenius, Rudolf (1597). Problemata logica. Marburg. (Repr. Frankfurt: Minerva, 1967.)Google Scholar
Goclenius, Rudolf (1613). Lexicon philosophicum. Frankfurt. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1964.)Google Scholar
Godoy, Petrus (1668). Disputationes Theologicae (3 vols.). Venice.Google Scholar
Godwin, Joscelyn (1979). Robert Fludd: Hermetic Philosopher and Surveyor of Two Worlds. Boulder, Colo.: Shambala.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, M. M. (1966). Hobbes's Science of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, la Calle, Urbano, Pedro, and y Echenique, Huarte, Amalio, (1925–6). ‘Constituciones de la Universidad de Salamanca (1422)’, Revista de Archivos, Bibliotecas y Museos. 47: ; 47:.Google Scholar
Goorle, David (1620). Exertitationes philosophicae quibus universa fere discutitur philosophia theoretica. Leiden.Google Scholar
Goorle, David (1651). Idea physicae, cui adjuncta est Epistola cuiusdam anonymi de terrae motu. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Gordon, Cosmo Alexander (1962). A Bibliography of Lucretius (Soho Bibliographies). London: Rupert Hart-Davis.Google Scholar
Gordon, Cosmo Alexander (1985). A Bibliography of Lucretius, Bury Saint Edmunds, Suffolk: St Paul's Bibliographies.Google Scholar
Gorland, A. (1907). Der Gottesbegriff bei Leibniz. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Goshen-Gottstein, Moshe (1989). ‘Bible et judaisme’, in Armogathe, J.-R., (ed.), Le Grand siècle et la Bible. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Goudin, Antoine (1864). Philosophie suivant les principes de Saint Thomas, trans. (French) Bourard, T.. Paris, (1st Latin ed. 1668.)Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1926a). La vocation de Malebranche. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1926b). La philosophie de Malebranche et son expérience religieuse. Paris: Vrin. (2d ed. 1947.)Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1937). Essais sur Descartes. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1948). La philosophie de Malebranche et son expérience religieuse. 2d ed. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1954a). ‘Doute méthodique ou négation méthodique?’, Les Etudes Philosophiques. 9:.Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1954b). ‘La crise de la theologie au temps de Descartes’, Revue de Theologie et de Philosophic. 3e ser. 4:.Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1958). Les premières pensées de Descartes: Contribution à l'histoire de l'anti-Renaissance (De Pétrarque à Descartes). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1962). La pensée métaphysique de Descartes. Paris: Vrin. (2d ed. 1969, 3d ed, 1978.)Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1966). Pascal. Commentaires. Paris: Vrin. (3d ed. 1978.)Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1972). La pensée religieuse de Descartes. 2d. ed. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1977). Fénelon philosophe. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1978). Cartésianisme et Augustinisme au XVIIe siècle. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri (1986). Blaise Pascal. Conversation et Apolodétique. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, Simone (1994). Pufendorf et le droit naturel. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin (1917). ‘Die Disputationes metaphysicae des Francesco Suarez” ihrer methodischen Eigenart und Fortwirkung’, in Grabmann 1926–56, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin (1926–56). Mittelalterliches Geistesleben. (3 vols.). Munich: M. Hueber.Google Scholar
Gracia, Jorge J. E. (1984). Introduction to the Problem of Individuation in the Early Middle Ages (Analytica). Munich and Vienna: Philosophia.Google Scholar
Gracia, Jorge J. E. (1991). ‘The Centrality of the Individual in the Philosophy of the Fourteenth Century’, History of Philosophy Quarterly. 8:.Google Scholar
Gracia, Jorge J. E. (1993). ‘Christian Wolff on Individuation’, History of Philosophy Quarterly. 10:.Google Scholar
Gracia, Jorge J. E. (ed.) (1994). Individuation in Scholasticism: The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-Reformation. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Graff, Harvey J. (1987). The Legacies of Literacy: Continuities and Contradictions in Western Culture and Society. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, Edward (1981). Much Ado About Nothing: Theories of Space and Vacuum from the Middle Ages to the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Robert M. (1952). Miracle and Natural Law in Graeco-Roman and Early Christian Thought. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Graunt, John (1662). Natural and Political Observations Mentioned in a Following Index and Made Upon the Bills of Mortality. London.Google Scholar
Gravelle, François (1601). Abrégé de la philosophie. Paris.Google Scholar
Grayling, A. C. (1986). Berkeley: The Central Arguments. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Green, L. C., and Dickason, O. P. (1989). The Law of Nations and the New World. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
Greene, R. A., and MacCallum, H. (1971). ‘Introduction’, in Culverwel 1971.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Major (1970). ‘Medical Statistics from Graunt to Farr’, in Pearson, E. S. and Kendall, M. G. (eds.), Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability. Darien, Conn.: Hafner.Google Scholar
Gregory, of Rimini [Ariminensis, Gregorius] (1522), Super primum et secundum sententiarum. Venice.Google Scholar
Gregory, of Rimini [Ariminensis, Gregorius] (1978–87). Lectura super primum et secundum sententiarum, Trapp, A. D. et al. (eds.) Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gregory, James (1668). Geometriae pars universalis. Padua.Google Scholar
Gregory, Tullio (1961). Scetticismo ed empirismo. Studio su Gassendi. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Gregory, Tullio (1964). ‘Studi sull'atomismo del seicento. I. Sebastiano Basson’, Giornale critico della filosofia italiana. 43:.Google Scholar
Gregory, Tullio (1966). ‘Studi sull'atomismo del seicento. II. David van Goorle e Daniel Sennert’, Giornale critico della filosofia italiana. 45:.Google Scholar
Gregory, Tullio (1967). ‘Studi sull'atomismo del seicento. III. Cudworth e l'atomismo’, Giornale critico della filosofia italiana. 46:.Google Scholar
Gregory, Tullio (1974). ‘Dio ingannatore e genio maligno. Nota in margine alla Meditationes di Descartes’, Giornale critico della filosofia italiana. 53:.Google Scholar
Gregory, Tullio (1982). ‘La troperie divine’, Studia Medievali. 23:.Google Scholar
Gregory, Tullio (1986). Etica e religione nella critica libertina. Naples: Guida.Google Scholar
Gregory, Tullio, et al. (eds.) (1981). Ricerche su letteratura libertina e letteratura clandestina nel Seicento. Florence: Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Grene, Marjorie (1986). ‘Die Einheit des Menschen: Descartes unter den Scholastikern’, Dialectica. 40:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gresh, Stephen (1986). Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism: The Latin Tradition (2 vols.). Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Greshake, Gisbert (1981). ‘Die theologische Herkunft des Personbegriffs’, in Pöltner, G. (ed.), Personale Freiheit und Pluralistische Gesellschaft. Vienna: Herder.Google Scholar
Griffin, Martin I. J. (1992). Latitudinarianism in the Seventeenth-Century Church of England. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Nicholas (1977). Relative Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, Nicolas and Jean-Luc, Marion, eds. (1987). Le Discours et sa méthode: Colloque pour le 350e anniversaire du Discours de la méthode (Epiméthée). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Grisard, J. (1976). François Viète, mathématicien de la fin du seizième siècle: Essai bio-bibliographique presenté en vue de l'obtention du doctoral de troinème cycle. Paris: Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, VIème section.Google Scholar
Groarke, Leo (1984). ‘Descartes’ First Meditation: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 22:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosholz, Emily (1991). Cartesian Method and the Problem of Reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1609). Mare liberum, sive de iure quod Batavis competit ad Indicana commercia, dissertatio. Leiden.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1625). De iure belli ac pacis. Paris.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1627). De veritate religions christianae. Leiden.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1643). De origine gentium americanum dissertatio altera adversus obtrectatorem. Paris.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1679). De veritate religionis christianae. In his Opera theologica. Amsterdam. Vol. 3.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1724). Le droit de la guerre et de la paix, trans. Barbeyrac, J. (2 vols.). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1735). De iure belli ac pacis libri tres [1625], ed. Gronovius, J. F. and Barbeyrac, J.. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1738). The Rights of War and Peace, in three Books, ed. Barbeyrac, J., trans. anonymous. London.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1805). Truth of the Christian Religion in Six Books [1627], ed. Le Clerc, J., trans. Clarke, J.. London.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1868). De Jure Praedae Commentarius, ed. Hamaker, G.. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1916). Mare liberum/ The Freedom of the Seas [1609], trans. Brown Scott, J.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1925). De lure belli ac Pacis (4 vols.), Latin and English edition, trans. Kelsey, F. W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1928–). Briefwisseling. The Hague: Nijhoff (vols. 1–11); Assen/Maastricht: van Gorcum (vol. 12); The Hague: Instituut voor Nederlandse Geschiedenis (vol. 13).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (1950). De jure praedae commentarius [1604], trans. Williams, G. L. and Zeydel, W. H. (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grunwald, G. (1907). Geschichte der Gottesbeweise im Mittelalter bis zum Ausgang der Hochscholastik (Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters VI, 3). Münster: Aschendorfsche buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Guareschi, I. (1916). ‘La teoria atomistica e Sebastiano Basso con notizie e considerazioni su William Higgins’, Memoria della Regale Accademia dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche et Naturali. 11:.Google Scholar
Guerlac, Henry (1973). ‘Newton and the Method of Analysis’, in Wiener, P. P. (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas (5 vols.). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Guerlac, Henry (1981). Newton on the Continens. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial (1953). Descartes: Selon l'ordre des raisons. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial (1955). Nouvelles réflexions sur la preuve ontologique. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial (1955–9). Malebranche (3 vols.). Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial (1956). Berkeley. Quatre études sur la perception et sur Dieu. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial (1967). Leibniz: Dynamique et métaphysique. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial (1968–74). Spinoza (2 vols.). Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial (1980). ‘The Metaphysics and Physics of Force in Descartes’, in Gaukroger 1980a.Google Scholar
Gueroult, Martial (1984). Descartes' Philosophy Interpreted according to the Order of Reasons, trans. Ariew, Roger. (2 vols.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Basil (1963). The French Image of China before and after Voltaire. Geneva: Institut et Musée Voltaire.Google Scholar
Gysi, Lydia (1962). Platonism and Cartesianism in the Philosophy of Ralph Cudworth. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud (1985). ‘Hugo Grotius and the History of Political Thought’, Political Theory. 13:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud (1988). ‘Moral Philosophy and Natural Law: From the Cambridge Platonists to the Scottish Enlightenment’, Political Science. 40:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud (1996). Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Hugo Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud (forthcoming a). ‘The Character and Obligation of Natural Law according to Richard Cumberland’, in Stewart, M. A. (ed.), Philosophy in the Age of Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haakonssen, Knud (forthcoming b). ‘Natural Law and the German Tradition’, in Goldie, M. and Wokler, R. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hacking, Ian (1971a). ‘Equipossibility Theories of Probability’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 22:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HackingIan, (1971b). ‘The Leibniz-Carnap Program for Inductive Logic’, Journal of Philosophy. 68:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1971c). ‘Jacques Bernoulli's Art of Conjecturing’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 22:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1972). ‘Individual Substance’, in Frankfurt, H. G. (ed.), Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1975a). The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1975b). ‘The Identity of Indiscernibles’, Journal of Philosophy. 72:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1975c). Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hägerström, Axel (1965). Recht, Pflicht und bindende Kraft des Vertrages nach römischer und naturrechtlicher Anschauung, ed. Olivecrona, K. (Acta Societatis Litterarum Humaniorum Regiae Upsaliensis 44:3). Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell and Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter (1983). Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste (Publications de l'Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales Genève). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Hahm, David E. (1977). The Origins of Stoic Cosmology. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Hahm, David E. (1985). ‘The Stoic Theory of Change’, Southern Journal of Philosophy. 23 (Supplement: Spindel Conference 1984: Recovering the Stoics):.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert (1966). ‘Mechanics and the Royal Society, 1668–1670’, British Journal for the History of Science. 3:.Google Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert (1975a). ‘Newton in France: A New View’, History of Science. 13:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert (1975b). ‘Magic, Metaphysics and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution’, in Bonelli, M. L. Rhigini and Shea, William R. (eds.), Reason, Experiment and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution. New York: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert (1980). Philosophers at War: The Quarrel between Newton and Leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. Rupert (1990). Henry More: Magic, Religion and Experiment (Blackwell Science Biographies). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, Joseph (1948). Heaven upon Earth and Characters of Vertues and Vices, ed. Kirk, R.. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Marie Boas. See Marie, Boas Hall.
Hall, Thomas Steele (1969). Ideas of Life and Matter: Studies in the History of General Physiology 600 B.C.—1900 A.D. (2 vols.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Editions published 1975 and later under the title A General History of Physiology.)Google Scholar
Halley, Edmund (1693). ‘An Estimate of the Degrees of the Mortality of Mankind, Drawn from Curious Tables of the Births and Funerals at the City of Breslaw; With an Attempt to Ascertain the Price of Annuities upon Lives’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 17:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, C. L. (1975). ‘Saccherian Arguments and the Self-Application of Logic’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 53:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamelin, Octave (1911). Le système de Descartes. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Hamilton, B. (1963). Political Thought in Sixteenth-Century Spain: A Study of the Political Ideas of Vitoria, De Solo, Suárez, and Molina. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, Notker (1972). Jus und Historie. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des historischen Denkens an deutschen Universitäten im späten 17. und im 18. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, Notker (1986). ‘Zum Fortwirken von Pufendorf's Naturrechtslehre an den Universitäten des Heiligen Römischen Reiches Deutscher Nation während des 18. Jahrhunderts’, in Samuel von Pufendorf 1632–1982, ed. Modéer, K. Å.. Stockholm: Nordiska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart (1973). ‘Spinoza and the Idea of Freedom’, in Grene, Marjorie (ed.), Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean (1986). Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hankins, James (1990). Plato in the Italian Renaissance (2 vols.). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hankins, Thomas L. (1967). ‘The Influence of Malebranche on the Science of Mechanics during the Eighteenth Century’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 28:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannaway, Owen (1975). The Chemists and the Word: The Didactic Origins of Chemistry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hannequin, A. (1896). ‘La preuve ontologique de Descartes défendue centre Leibniz’, Revue de métaphysique et de morale. 4: (also in Etudes d'Histoire des Sciences et d'Histoire de la Philosophie, vol. 1. Paris: Alcan 1908).Google Scholar
Hannequin, A. (1908). ‘La première philosophie de Leibnitz’, in Hannequin, A., Etudes d'histoire des sciences et d'histoire de la philosophie (2 vols.). Paris: Alcan, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Hardin, C. L. (1978). ‘Spinoza on Immortality and Time’, in Shahan, R. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: New Perspectives. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Hardouin, Jean (1733). Athei detecti, in Opera Varia. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Harris, E. (1975). ‘Spinoza's Theory of Immortality’, in Mandelbaum, M. and Freeman, E. (eds.), Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation. LaSalle, Ill. Open Court.Google Scholar
Harris, Ian (1993). The Mind of John Locke. A Study in Political Theory in Its Intellectual Setting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, John (1708–10). Lexicon Technicum: Or, an Universal English Dictionary of Arts and Sciences Explaining Not Only the Terms of Art, but the Arts Themselves. 2d ed. (2 vols). London, (1st ed. of vol. 1 alone, London 1704; the 1708–10 is the 2d ed. of vol. 1 and the 1st ed. of vol. 2.)Google Scholar
Harrison, Charles Trawick (1934). ‘The Ancient Atomists and English Literature of the Seventeenth Century’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 45:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Peter (1993). ‘Newtonian Science, Miracles and the Laws of Nature (abstract)’, in Haakonssen, K. and Thiel, U. (eds.), Reason, Will and Nature: Voluntarism in Metaphysics and Morals from Ockham to Kant (Yearbook of the Australasian Society for the History of Philosophy, vol. 1). Canberra: Australasian Society for the History of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Harth, E. (1992). Cartesian Women: Versions and Subversions of Rational Discourse in the Old Regime. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hartley, David (1749). Observations on Man, His Frame, His Duty, and His Expectations (2 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary (1979). ‘Force (God) in Descartes' Physics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 10:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, Gary (1985). ‘First Philosophy and Natural Philosophy in Descartes’, in Holland, A. J. (ed.), Philosophy: Its History and Historiography. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary (1986). ‘The Senses and the Fleshless Eye: The Meditations as Cognitive Exercises’, in Rorty 1986a.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary (1989). ‘Science, Certainty, and Descartes’, in Fine, A. and Leplin, J. (eds.), PSA 1988 (2 vols.), vol. 2. East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary (1990). ‘Metaphysics and the New Science’, in Lindberg, D. and Westman, R. (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary (1992). ‘Descartes’ Physiology and Its Relation to His Psychology’, in Cottingham, J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary (1993). ‘Reason, Nature, and God in Descartes’, in Voss 1993.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary, and William, Epstein (1979). ‘The Sensory Core and the Medieval Foundations of Early Modern Perceptual Theory’, Isis. 70:.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawes, Joan L. (1968). ‘Newton and the “Electrical Attraction Unexcited”’, Annals of Science. 24:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazard, Paul (1935). La Crise de conscience européene, 1680–1715. Paris: Boivin.Google Scholar
Hearne, Thomas (ed.) (1720). A Collection of Curious Discourses. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heereboord, Adrian (1643). Parallelismus Aristotelicae et Cartesianae philosophiae naturalis. Leiden.Google Scholar
Heereboord, Adrian (1648). Sermo extemporaneus de recta philosophice disputandi ratione. Leiden.Google Scholar
Heereboord, Adrian (1654a). Meletemata philosophica in quibus pleraeque res metaphysicae ventilantur. Leiden.Google Scholar
Heereboord, Adrian (1654b). Philosophia rationalis, moralis et naturalis. Leiden.Google Scholar
Heereboord, Adrian (1663). Philosophia naturalis cum…novis commentariis partim e nob. D. Cartesio…aliisque praestantioribus hujus seculi philosophis petitis, partim ex propria opinione dictatis, explicata. Leiden.Google Scholar
Heereboord, Adrian (1680). Meletemata philosophica. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969–79). Werke. ed. Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl Markus (20 vols.). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1995). Lectures on the History of Philosophy (3 vols.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1957a). Identität und Differenz. Pfullingen: G. Neske.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1957b). ‘Die onto-theologische Verfassung der Metaphysik’, in Heidegger 1957a.Google Scholar
Heider, Wolfgang (1629). Philosophiae moralis systema seu Commentationes in universam Aristotelis ethicem. Jena.Google Scholar
Heilbron, John L. (1979). Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries: A Study of Early Modern Physics. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heilbron, John L. (1982). Elements of Early Modern Physics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heilbron, John L. (1993). Weighing Imponderables and Other Quantitative Science Around 1800 (suppl. to Vol. 24, Part 1, of Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heimsoeth, H. (1960). Atom, Seele, Monade: Historische Ursprünge und Hintergründe von Kants Antinomie der Teilung (Akad. d. Wiss. und Lit. Mainz, Abhandlungen der Geist.-Sozialwiss. Klasse). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Heinekamp, Albert (ed.) (1983). Leibniz et la Renaissance (Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa, 23). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Heinekamp, Albert (ed.) (1988). Leibniz. Questions de logique. (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Helbing, Mario Otto (1989). La filosofia di Francesco Buonamici, professore di Galileo a Pisa. Pisa: Nistri-Lischi.Google Scholar
Hemmingsen, Niels (1562). De lege naturae apodictica methodus. Wittenberg.Google Scholar
Henderson, G. D. (1952). Chevalier Ramsay. London: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Henninger, Mark G. (1989). Relations. Medieval Theories 1250–1325. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. (1960). Der ontologische Gottesbeweis. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Henricides, Guilelmus (1627). Decas…philosophica…. Leiden.Google Scholar
Henry, John (1982a). ‘Thomas Harriot and Atomism: A Reappraisal’, History of Science. 20:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, John (1982b). ‘Atomism and Eschatology: Catholicism and Natural Philosophy in the Interregnum’, British Journal for the History of Science. 15:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, John (1986a). ‘A Cambridge Platonist's Materialism: Henry More and the Concept of Soul’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 49:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, John (1986b). ‘Occult Qualities and the Experimental Philosophy: Active Principles in pre-Newtonian Matter Theory’, History of Science. 24:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, John (1987). ‘Medicine and Pneumatology: Henry More, Richard Baxter and Francis Glisson's Treatise on the Energetic Nature of Substance’, Medical History. 31:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, John (1988). ‘Newton, Matter and Magic’, in Fauvel, John et al. (eds.), Let Newton BeOxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, John (1989a). ‘The Matter of Souls: Medical Theory and Theology in Seventeenth-Century England’, in French, R. and Wear, A., (eds.), The Medical Revolution of the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, John (1989b). ‘Robert Hooke, the Incongruous Mechanist’, in Hunter, Michael and Schaffer, Simon (eds.), Robert Hooke: New Studies. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
Henry, John (1990). ‘Henry More versus Robert Boyle: The Spirit of Nature and the Nature of Providence’, in Hutton 1990.Google Scholar
Henry, John (1993). ‘Henry More and Newton's Gravity’, History of Science. 31:.Google Scholar
Henry, John (1994). ‘“Pray Do Not Ascribe That Notion to Me”: God and Newton's Gravity’, in Force, James and Popkin, Richard (eds.), The Books of Nature and Scripture:Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hepburn, R. W. (1972). ‘Hobbes on the Knowledge of God’, in Cranston, Maurice and Peters, Richard S. (ed.), Hobbes and Rousseau: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Herbert, of Cherbury, Edward, Lord (1624). De veritate, prout distinguitur a revelatione, a verisimili, a possibili, et a falso. Paris.Google Scholar
Herbert, of Cherbury, Edward, Lord (1633). De veritate, prout distinguitur a revelatione, a verisimili, a possibili, et a falso. 2d ed. London.Google Scholar
Herbert, of Cherbury, Edward, Lord (1645). De veritate…cui operi additi sunt duo alii tractatus: Primus, de causis errorum: alter, de religione laici; una cum appendice ad sacerdotes de religione laici, et quibusdam Poematibus, 3d ed. London. (Repr. Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann, 1966.)Google Scholar
Herbert, of Cherbury, Edward, Lord (1663). De religione gentilium. Amsterdam. (Repr. Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann, 1967.)Google Scholar
Herbert, of Cherbury, Edward, Lord (1768). A Dialogue between a Tutor and His Pupil. London. (Repr. Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann, 1971.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, of Cherbury, Edward, Lord (1937). De veritate, trans. Carré, Meyrick H.. Bristol: Arrowsmith.Google Scholar
Herbert, of Cherbury, Edward, Lord (1944). De religione laici, trans. Hutchenson, H. R.. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Herivel, John W. (1965). The Background to Newton's Principia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hermes Trismegistus, Pseudo- (1924). Hermetica, ed. and trans. Scott, Walter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hermes Trismegistus, Pseudo- (1945–54). Corpus Hermeticum, ed. Nock, Arthur D., trans. [French] Festugière, A. J. (4 vols.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Hervada, J. (1983). ‘The Old and the New in the Hypothesis “Etiamsi Daremus” of Grotius’, Grotiana. N.s. 4:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, Mary B. (1970). ‘Hermeticism and Historiography: An Apology for the Internal History of Science’, in Stuewer, Roger H. (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science: vol. 5, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary B. (1978). ‘Action at a Distance’, in McMullin, Ernan (ed.), The Concept of Matter in Modern Philosophy. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Heyd, Michael (1979). ‘From Rationalist Theology to Cartesian Voluntarism’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 40:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyd, Michael (1981). ‘The Reaction to Enthusiasm in the Seventeenth Century: Towards an Integrative Approach’, Journal of Modern History. 53:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hick, J., and McGill, A. C. (eds.) (1967). The Many-faced Argument. Recent Studies on the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hildesheimer, Françoise (1991). Le Jansenisme en France au XVIIe et XVIII siècles. Paris: Publisud.Google Scholar
Hill, J. E. Christopher (1971). The Antichrist in 17th Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, J. E. Christopher (1972). The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas in the English Revolution. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Hill, J. E. Christopher (1975). The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas in the English Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hill, J. E. Christopher (1977). Milton and the English Revolution. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Hill, J. E. Christopher (1988). ‘Till the Conversion of the Jews’, in Popkin, R. H. (ed.), Millenarianism and Messianism in English Literature and Thought 1650–1800. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hill, Nicholas (1601). Philosophia Epicurea, Democritiana, Theophrastica proposita simpliciter, non edocta. Per Nicolaum Hill Anglum, Londinensem. Paris. (2d ed., Geneva and Cologne, 1619.)Google Scholar
Hillenaar, Henk (1967). Fénelon et le Jésuites. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko (1962). ‘Cogito, ergo sum: Inference or Performance?Philosophical Review. 71:. (Also in Doney, Willis (ed.), Descartes: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1967.)Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko, and Unto, Remes (1974). The Method of Analysis: Its Geometrical Origin and Its General Significance (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaako (1978). ‘A Discourse on Descartes's Method’, in Hooker, Michael (ed.), Descartes: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hippocrates, (1981). The Hippocratic Treatises: ‘On Generation’, ‘On the Nature of the Child’, ‘Diseases IV’ (Ars Medica), ed. Lonie, I. M.. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Emanuel (1949). Geschichte der neueren evangelischen Theologie im Zusammenhang mit den allgemeinen Bewegungen des europäischen Denkens. Gutersloh: C. Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. (1977). The Passions and the Interests. Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1629). Eight bookes of the Peloponnesian warre written by Thucydides. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1642). Elementorum philosophiae sectio tertia De Cive. Paris.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1644). Tractatus opticus, in Mersenne, M., Universae geometriae mixtaeque mathematicae synopsis. Paris.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1650a). Human Nature: Or the Fundamental Elements of Policy. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1650b). De Corpore Politico: Or the Elements of Law, Moral and Politic. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1651). Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1655). Elementorum philosophiae sectio prima De Corpore. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1658). Elementorum philosophiae sectio secunda De Homine. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1668). Thomæ Hobbes Malmesburiensis opera philosophica, quae Latine scripsit, omnia. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1679). A Dialogue between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1681). Behemoth, or the Long Parliament. London.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1839–45a). Opera philosophica quae Latine scripsit omnia, ed. Molesworth, WilliamSir (5 vols.). London. (Repr. Darmstadt: Scientia, 1966.)Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1839–45b). The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, ed. Molesworth, WilliamSir (11 vols.). London. (Repr. Darmstadt: Scientia, 1962.)Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1928). The Elements of Law, ed. Tönnies, Ferdinand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1957). Leviathan, ed. Oakeshott, M.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1963). ‘Tractatus opticus’, ed. Alessio, F., Rivista critica di storia della filosofia. 18:.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1968). Leviathan, ed. MacPherson, C. B.. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1969). The Elements of Law, ed. Tönnies, F. (2d ed). New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1972). Man and Citizen, ed. Gert, Bernard. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1973). Critique du De mundo de Thomas White, ed. Jacquot, J. and Jones, H. W. (L'Histoire des Sciences: Texte et Etudes). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1976). Thomas White's De mundo Examined, trans. Jones, H. W.. London: Bradford University Press in association with Crosby Lockwood Staples.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1981). Computatio sive logica. Logic. (De corpore, part I) trans. Martinich, A., ed. Hungerland, Isabel C. and Vick, G. R.. New York: Abaris Books.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1983a). De cive, The Latin Version, ed. Warrender, Howard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1983b). De cive, The English Version, ed. Warrender, Howard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1988). Court traité des premiers principes: Le Short Tract on First Principles de 1630–1631. La naissance de Thomas Hobbes à la pensée moderne, ed., trans. and commentary by Bernhardt, Jean (Epiméthée: Essais Philosophiques). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1991). Leviathan, ed. Tuck, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1994). The Correspondence of Thomas Hobbes, ed. Malcolm, Noel (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, Timothy (1993). ‘Conscience and Reason: The Natural Law Theory of Jean Barbeyrac’, Historical Journal. 36:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstrasser, Timothy (forthcoming). ‘Beyond Pufendorf's Socialitas: Christian Thomasius and Practical Philosophy’, in Bödeker, H.-E. and Hont, I. (eds.), Unsocial Sociability. Natural Law and the Eighteenth-Century Discourse on Society. London: Routledge.
Hody, Humphry (1694). The Resurrection of the (Same) Body Asserted. London.Google Scholar
Hoeres, W. (1965). ‘Francis Suarez and the Teaching of John Duns Scotus on univocatio entis’, in Ryan, J. K. and Bonensea, B. (eds.), John Duns Scotus 1265–1965. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Paul (1986). ‘The Unity of Descartes' Man’, Philosophical Review. 95:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Paul (1990). ‘Cartesian Passions and Cartesian Dualism’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 71:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, A. J. (ed.) (1985). Philosophy, Its History and Historiography. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höltgen, K. J. (1965). ‘Synoptische Tabellen in der medizinischen Literatur und die Logik Agricolas und Ramus’, Sudhoffs Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin und der Naturwissenschaften. 49:.Google Scholar
Holzgrefe, J. L. (1989). ‘The Origins of Modern International Relations Theory’, Review of International Studies. 15:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, I. (1987). ‘The Language of Sociability and Commerce: Samuel Pufendorf and the Theoretical Foundations of the “Four stages Theory”’, in Pagden, A. R. D. (ed.), The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, F. C. (1964). The Divine Politics of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hooke, R. (1705). Posthumous Works of Robert Hooke, ed. Waller, R.. London. (Repr. London: Cass, 1971.)Google Scholar
Hooke, R. (1726). Philosophical Experiments and Observations of the Late Eminent Dr. Robert Hooke, ed. Derham, W.. London. (Repr. London: Cass, 1967.)Google Scholar
Hooke, Robert (1665). Micrographia. London. (Repr. London: Science Heritage Ltd., 1987.)Google Scholar
Hooker, Michael (1982). ‘Berkeley's Argument from Design’, in Turbayne, 1982.Google Scholar
Hooper, George (1699). ‘A Calculation of the Credibility of Human Testimony’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 21:.Google Scholar
Hooper, George (1757). The Works of the Right Reverend Father in God, George Hooper, D.D.Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoormann, C. F. A. (1976). ‘A Further Examination of Saccheri's Use of the Consequentia Mirabilis’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 17:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooykaas, R. (1947). ‘Het ontstaan van de chemische atoomleer’, Tijdschirift voor Philosophie. 9:.Google Scholar
Hooykaas, R. (1949). ‘Chemical Trichotomy before Paracelsus?’, Archives internationales d'histoires des sciences. 28:.Google Scholar
Hooykaas, R. (1970). ‘Isaac Beeckman’, in Gillispie, 1970–80, vol. I.
Hooykaas, R. (1972). Religion and the Rise of Modern Science. Edinburgh and London: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Höpfl, H. (1985). The Christian Polity of John Calvin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horne, T. A. (1990). Property Rights and Poverty. Political Argument in Britain, 1605–1834. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Maryanne Cline (1974). ‘Natural Law as the Foundation for an Autonomous Ethics: Pierre Charron's De la sagesse’, Studies in the Renaissance. 21:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hostler, J. (1975). Leibniz's Moral Philosophy. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Houston, R.A. (1988). Literacy in Early Modern Europe: Culture and Education 1500–1800. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Howell, W. S. (1956). Logic and Rhetoric in England, 1500–1700. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Howell, W. S. (1971). Eighteenth-Century British Logic and Rhetoric. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Howells, B. (1984). ‘Pascal's “Pari”’, Modern Language Review. 79:.Google Scholar
Hoyles, John (1971). The Waning of the Renaissance, 1640–1740: Studies in the Thought and Poetry of Henry More, John Norris and Isaac Watts. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hruschka, Joachim (1984). ‘Ordentliche und ausserordentliche Zurechnung bei Pufendorf. Zur Geschichte und zur Bedeutung der Differenz von actio libera in se und actio libera in sua causa’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft. 96:.Google Scholar
Hruschka, Joachim (1986). Das deontologische Sechseck bei Gottfried Achenwall im Jahre 1767. Zur Geschichte der deontischen Grundbegriffe in der Universalijurisprudenz zwischen Suárez und Kant. Hamburg: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Hübener, Wolfgang (1983). ‘Leibniz und der Renaissance-Lullismus’, in Heinekamp, Albert (ed.), Leibniz et la Renaissance (Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa, 23), Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Hübner, J. (1975). Die Theologie Johannes Keplers zwischen Orthodoxie und Naturwissenschaft. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Huet, Pierre-Daniel (1689). Censura Philosophiae Cartesianae. Paris. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1971.)Google Scholar
Huet, Pierre-Daniel (1692). Nouveaux Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire du cartésianisme (n.p.).Google Scholar
Huet, Pierre-Daniel (1723). Traité philosophique de la foiblesse de l'esprit humain. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Huffman, William H. (1988). Robert Fludd and the End of the Renaissance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1976). Natural History of Religion, ed. Price, John Valdimir. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., rev. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hungerland, Isabel C., and Vick, G. R. (1981). ‘Hobbes' Theory of Language, Speech and Reasoning’, in Hobbes, 1981.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael (1981). Science and Society in Restoration England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael (1989). Establishing the New Science: The Experience of the Early Royal Society. Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell.Google Scholar
Huonder, Quirin (1968). Die Gottesbeweise. Geschichte und Schicksal. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Hussey, Edward (1990). ‘The Beginnings of Epistemology: From Homer to Philolaus’, in Everson, 1990.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis (1728). An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions. London.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Keith (1982). ‘What Happened to Occult Qualities in the Scientific Revolution?Isis. 73:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, Keith (1983). ‘Supernaturalism and the Mechanical Philosophy’, History of Science. 21:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, Keith (1991). ‘Dormitive Virtues, Scholastic Qualities, and the New Philosophies’, History of Science. 29:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutin, S. (1966). Henry More: Essai sur les doctreines théosophiques chez les Platoniciens de Cambridge. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Hutton, Sarah (ed.) (1990). Henry More (1614–1687): Tercentenary Studies, Biography and Bibliography by Robert Crocker (International Archives of the History of Ideas, 127). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Huygens, Christiaan (1657). Tractatus de rationciniis in aleae ludo. Leiden.Google Scholar
Huygens, Christiaan (1659). De motu corporum ex percussione [1659], in Huygens, 1888–1950, vol. 16.
Huygens, Christiaan (1690). Traité de la lumière…avec un discours de la cause de la pesanteur. Paris.Google Scholar
Huygens, Christiaan (1703). Opuscula postuma. Leiden.Google Scholar
Huygens, Christiaan (1888–1950). Oeuvres complètes, eds. Haan, D. Bierans, Bosscha, J., Kortweg, D. J., Vollgraff, J. A. (22 vols.). The Hague: Société Hollandaise des Sciences and Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Huygens, Christiaan (1912). Treatise on Light, trans. Thompson, Silvanus P.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Huygens, Christiaan (1977). ‘Christiaan Huygens' The Motion of Colliding Bodies’, trans. Blackwell, Richard J., Isis. 68:.Google Scholar
Hyman, Arthur, and Walsh, James J. (eds.) (1973). Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hyman, Arthur, and Walsh, James J., eds. (1986). Philosophy in the Middle Ages: The Christian, Islamic, and Jewish Traditions. 2d ed. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.Google Scholar
Idel, Moshe (1988). Kabbalah: New Perspectives. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ignatius, of Loyola (1950). The Spiritual Exercises, trans. Longridge, W. H. (4th ed.). London: Mowbray.Google Scholar
Ignatius, of Loyola (1969). Exercitia spiritualia (Monumenta historica Societatis Iesu), ed. Calveras, J.. Rome: Institutum historicum Societatis Iesu.Google Scholar
Ignatius, of Loyola (1989). The Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius Loyola, trans. Backhouse, Halcyon. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Ilting, Karl-Heinz (1983). Naturrecht und Sittlichkeit. (Sprache und Geschichte). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Iltis, Carolyn (1971). ‘Leibniz and the Vis Viva Controversy’, Isis. 62:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iltis, Carolyn (1973). ‘The Leibnizian-Newtonian Debates: Natural Philosophy and Social Psychology’, British Journal for the History of Science. 6:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iltis, Carolyn (1974). ‘Leibniz' Concept of Force: Physics and Metaphysics’, in Akten des II. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses Hannover, 17–22 Juli 1972 (4 vols.). (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa). Stuttgart: Steiner, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Ingegno, Alfonso (1988). ‘The New Philosophy of Nature’, in Skinner, Schmitt, and Kessler, 1988.Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad (1985). Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ishiguro, Hidé (1972). Leibniz's Philosophy of Logic and Language. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. (2d ed. 1990.)Google Scholar
Jacob, J. R. (1977). Robert Boyle and the English Revolution: A Study in Social and Intellectual Change (Studies in the History of Science). New York: Burt Franklin.Google Scholar
Jacquot, Jean (1952). ‘Thomas Harriot's Reputation for Impiety’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London. 9:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquot, Jean (1974). ‘Harriot, Hill, Warner and the New Philosophy’, in , Shirley 1974.Google Scholar
Jaeger, F. M. (1921). ‘Goorle (David van) Junior’. Nieuw Nederlandsch Biografisch Woordenboek. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff's Uitgevers-Maatschappij, vol. 5, p..Google Scholar
Jaki, S. T. (1978). The Road of Science and the Ways to God. Edinburgh: Scottish University Press.Google Scholar
Jalabert, J. (1960). Le Dieu de Leibniz. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
James, Susan (1987). ‘Certain and Less Certain Knowledge’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 87:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Susan (1993). ‘Spinoza the Stoic’, in Sorell, Tom (ed.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janke, W. (1963). ‘Das ontologische Argument in der Frühzeit des Leibnizschen Denkens (1676–1678)’, Kant-Studien. 54:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansenius, Cornelius (1640). Augustinus (3 vols.). Louvain. (Repr. Frankfurt: Minerva, 1964.)Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa (1974). Francis Bacon: Discovery and the Art of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa (1982). ‘Humanism and the Teaching of Logic’, in Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A., Pinborg, J. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa (1985). ‘Experientia literata ou Novum Organum? Le dilemme de la méthode scientifique de Bacon’, in Malherbe, Michel and Pousseur, Jean-Marie (eds.), Francis Bacon: Science et méthode, Actes du Colloque de Nantes. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa (1988). ‘Humanistic Logic’, in Skinner, Schmitt, and Kessler, 1988.Google Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas (1976). ‘Galileo's Road to Truth and the Demonstrative Regress’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 7:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas (1984). The Birth of History and Philosophy of Science: Kepler's A Defense of Tycho against Ursus with Essays on Its Provenance and Significance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas (1988). ‘Epistemology of the Sciences’, in Skinner, Schmitt, and Kessler, 1988.Google Scholar
Jesseph, Douglas M. (1989). ‘Philosophical Theory and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 20:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesseph, Douglas [M.] (1993). Berkeley's Philosophy of Mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Damascene (1860). Opera, ed. Migne, J. P. and Lequien, P. Michael. (3 vols.). (Patrologia Graeca). Paris.Google Scholar
John, of St. Thomas (1930–7). Cursus Philosophicus Thomisticus, ed. Reiser, B. (3 vols.). Turin: Marietti.Google Scholar
John, of the Cross (1645–7). Oeuvres spirituelles du Bienheureux Père Jean de la Croix, trans. [French] Père Cyprien de la Nativité (2 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
John, of the Cross (1974). The Dark Night of the Soul, trans. Zimmerman, Benedict. Greenwood, S.C.: Attic Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, George A. (1923). The Development of Berkeley's Philosophy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jolley, Nicholas (1984). Leibniz and Locke: A Study of the New Essays on Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jolley, Nicholas (1986). ‘Leibniz and Phenomenalism’, Studia Leibnitiana. 18:.Google Scholar
Jolley, Nicholas (1988). ‘Leibniz and Malebranche on Innate Ideas’, Philosophical Review. 97:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolley, Nicholas (1990). The Light of the Soul: Theories of Ideas in Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jolley, Nicholas (ed.) (1995). The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Howard (1981). Pierre Gassendi, 1592–1655. An Intellectual Biography. Nieuwkoop: De Graaf.Google Scholar
Jones, Howard (1989). The Epicurean Tradition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, Rufus (1954). Spiritual Reformers of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. New York: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R., and Stephen, Toulmin (1988). The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, Mark D. (1984). ‘The Intelligibility of the World and the Divine Ideas in Aquinas’, Review of Metaphysics. 38:.Google Scholar
Joseph, H. W. B.(1949). Lectures on the Philosophy of Leibniz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joy, Lynn (1987). Gassendi the Atomist: Advocate of History in an Age of Science (Ideas in Context). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joy, Lynn (1992). ‘Epicureanism in Renaissance Moral and Natural Philosophy’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 53:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judovitz, Dalia (1988). Subjectivity and Representation in Descartes: The Origins of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Judovitz, Dalia (1993). ‘Vision, Representation and Technology in Descartes’, in Levin, David Michael (ed.), Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Julien Eymard d'Angers, Father (1951). ‘Le Stoïcisme dans le traité “De l'usage des passions” de l'Oratorien J. E. Senault (1641)’, Revue des sciences religieuses. 25:.Google Scholar
Julien Eymard d'Angers, Father (1976). Recherches sur le stoïcisme aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles, ed. Antoine, L.. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Jungius, Joachim (1638). Logica Hamburgensis. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Jungius, Joachim (1957). Logica Hamburgensis, ed. Meyer, R. W. (Veröffentlichungen der Joachim Jungius-Gesellschaft der Wissenshaften, Hamburg, I). Hamburg: J. J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Jungius, Joachim (1977). Joachimi Jungii Logicae Hamburgensis additamenta, ed. Risse, W. (Veröffentlichungen der Joachim Jungius-Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Hamburg, 29). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Jungius, Joachim (1982). Joachim Jungius. Praelectiones physicae. Historisch-kritische Edition, ed. Meinel, C. (Veröffentlichungen der Joachim Jungius-Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 45). Göttingen: Vanden hoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Jungst, Walter (1912). Das Verhältnis von Philosophie und Theologie bei den Cartesianern Malebranche, Poiret und Spinoza. Eine philosophiegeschichtliche Untersuchung. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
Jurieu, Pierre (1687). The Accomplishment of Scripture Prophecies. London.Google Scholar
Kabitz, Willy (1909). Die Philosophie des jungen Leibniz. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kabitz, Willy (1932). ‘Leibniz und Berkeley’, Sitzungsberichte der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophische-historische Klasse. 24:.Google Scholar
Kagan, Richard L. (1974). Students and Society in Early Modern Spain. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles (1966). ‘Sensation and Consciousness in Aristotle's Psychology’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 48:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalinowski, G. (1977). ‘La logique juridique de Leibniz. Conception et contenu’, Studia Leibnitiana. 9:.Google Scholar
Kalinowski, G., and Gardies, J.-L. (1974). ‘Un logicien déontique avant la lettre: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie. 60:.Google Scholar
Kalmar, Martin (1977). ‘Thomas Harriot's De Reflexione Corporum Rotundorum: An Early Solution to the Problem of Impact’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 16:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangro, Hans (1975). ‘Daniel Sennert’, in Gillispie, 1970–80, vol. 12.
Kant, Immanuel (1900–). Kants gesammelte Schriften, ed. Wissenschaften, Königlich Preussischen Akademie, later the Wissenschaften, Deutsche Akademie (27 vols. to date). Berlin: G. Reimer, later de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1933). Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, Norman Kemp. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Yosef (1989). From Christianity to Judiasm. The Life of Isaac Orobio de Castro. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kargon, Robert H. (1965). ‘William Petty's Mechanical Philosophy’, Isis. 56:.Google Scholar
Kargon, Robert H. (1966). Atomism in England from Harriot to Newton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kassler, Jamie C. (1991). ‘The Paradox of Power: Hobbes and Stoic Naturalism’, in Gaukroger, Stephen (ed.), The Uses of Antiquity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Katz, David S. (1982). Philo-semitism and the Readmission of the Jews to England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, David S. (1988). Sabbath and Sectarianism in Seventeenth-Century England. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, V. Milo (1966). The Pilgrim's Progress and Traditions in Puritan Meditation. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kavka, Gregory S. (1986). Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kearney, Hugh (1970). Scholars and Gentlemen: Universities and Society in Pre-Industrial Britain 1500–1700. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomaeus (1600). Systema logicae. Hanau.Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomaeus (1606a). Gymnasium logicum. London.Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomaeus (1606b). Praecognitorum logicorum tractatus III. Hanau.Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomaeus (1607). Systema ethicae. …London.Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomaeus (1609). Scientiae metaphysicae compendiosum systema. Hanau.Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomaeus (1612). Systema physicum. Hanau.Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomaeus (1613). Systema systematum. Hanau.Google Scholar
Keckermann, Bartholomaeus (1614). Operum omnium quae extant tomus primus et secundus (2 vols). Geneva.Google Scholar
Kelly, Suzanne (1965). The De Mundo of William Gilbert. Amsterdam: Menno Hertzberger.Google Scholar
Kelpius, Johannes, and Johannes, Ericius (1690). Ethicus ethnicus ineptus Christianae juventutis hodegus. …Altdorf.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, Norman (1902). Studies in the Cartesian Philosophy. London: Macmillan. (Repr., New York: Russell and Russell 1962.)Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, Norman (1941). The Philosophy of David Hume. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, J. (1970). Ethical Naturalism: Hobbes and Hume. London: Macmillan and St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. G. (1956). ‘The Beginnings of a Probability Calculus’, Biometrika. 43:. (Repr. in Pearson, E. S. and Kendall, M. G. (eds.), Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability, Darien, Conn.: Hafner, 1970.)Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. (1977). ‘Where Shall the History of Statistics Begin?’, in Plackett, R. L. and Kendall, M. G. (eds.), Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G., and Plackett, R. L. (eds.) (1977). Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Kennington, Richard (1971). ‘Finitude of Descartes' Evil Genius’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 32:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony (1968). Descartes. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony (1970). ‘The Cartesian Circle and the Eternal Truths’, Journal of Philosophy. 57:.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony (1972). ‘Descartes on the Will’, in Butler, R. J. (ed.), Cartesian Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Keohane, Nannerl O. (1980). Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepler, Johannes (1596). Prodromus Dissertationum Cosmographicarum seu Mysterium Cosmographicum. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes (1602). De Fundamentis Astrologia Certioribus. Prague.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes (1604). Ad Vitellionem Paralipomena, quibus Astronomiae pars Optica traditur. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes (1609). Astronomia Nova. Prague.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes (1611). Dioptrice. Augsburg.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes (1618–21). Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae. Linz and Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes (1619). De Harmonice Mundi. Augsburg.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes (1621). … Mysterium Cosmographicum. 2d ed. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes (1937–). Gesammelte Werke. ed. Dyck, W. and Caspar, M. (20 vols. to date). Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Kern, W. (1964). ‘Über den ontologischen Gottesbeweis in der Metaphysik des 17. Jhts. Anhang eines Buches von D. Henrich’, Scholastik. 39:.Google Scholar
Kessler, Eckhard (1988). ‘The Intellective Soul’, in Schmitt, , Skinner, , and Kessler, 1988.Google Scholar
Keynes, , Maynard, John (1947). ‘Newton, the Man’, in The Royal Society Newton Tercentenary Celebrations 15–19 July 1946. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kilcullen, John (1988). Sincerity and Truth: Essays on Arnauld, Bayle, and Toleration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilcullen, John (1994). ‘Natural Law and Will in Ockham’, in Haakonssen, K. and Thiel, U. (eds.), History of Philosophy Yearbook, 1 (Reason, Will and Nature: Voluntarism in Metaphysics and Morals from Ockham to Kant). Canberra: Australasian Society for the History of Philosophy.Google Scholar
King, Peter, 7th Baron King (1830). The Life of John Locke with Extracts from His Correspondence, Journals, and Commonplace Books (2 vols.). London.Google Scholar
King, William (1781). De origine mali (1702), trans. Law, Edmund. London, 1731; 5th ed. London.Google Scholar
Kircher, Athanasius S.J. (1641). Magnes, sive de Arte Magnetica. Rome.Google Scholar
Kircher, Athanasius S.J. (1665). Mundus subterraneus. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kircher, Athanasius S.J. (1667). China illustrata. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S.; Raven, J. E.; and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1983). The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. 2d ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, Linda (1987). Richard Cumberland and Natural Law. Cambridge: J. Clarke and Co.Google Scholar
Klaaren, E. M. (1977). Religious Origins of Modern Science: Belief in Creation in Seventeenth-Century Thought. Grand Rapids: William B. Erdmans.Google Scholar
Kline, A. David (1987). ‘Berkeley's Divine Language Argument’, in Sosa, 1987.Google Scholar
Kneale, William, and Martha, Kneale (1962). The Development of Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knecht, H. H. (1981). La logique chez Leibniz. Essai sur le rationalisme baroque. Lausanne: Editions l'ăge de l'homme.Google Scholar
Knight, William Stanley Macbean (1925). The Life and Works of Hugo Grotius. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Knorr von Rosenroth, Christian (ed.) (1677). Kabbala Denudata, seu Doctrina hebraeorum transcendentalis et metaphysica atque theologica (2 vols.). Sulzbach.Google Scholar
Knorr, Wilbur R. (1993). The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems. New York: Dover. (Orig. ed. Boston: Birkhäuser Verlag, 1986.)Google Scholar
Koester, Helmut (1968). ‘NoηÓς Φʋσεως: the Concept of Natural Law in Greek Thought’, in Neusner, Jacob (ed.), Religions in Antiquity. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kolakowski, Leszek (1987). Chrétiens sans église, trans. [French] Posner, Anna (philosophie, Bibliothèque). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Kors, Alan Charles (1990). Atheism in France 1650–1729. Vol. I: The Orthodox Sources of Disbelief. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre (1922). Essai sur l'idée de Dieu et les preuves de son existence chez Descartes. Paris: Leroux. (Revised German text: Descartes und die Scholastik. Bonn: F. Cohen, 1923.)Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre (1929). La Philosophie de Jacob Boehme. Paris.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre (1957). From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre (1959). ‘Jean Baptiste Benedetti, critique d'Aristote’, in Mélanges offerts à Etienne Gilson. Paris: Vrin, and Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre (1966). Etudes galiléennes. 2d ed. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre (1968a). Newtonian Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre (1968b). ‘Concept and Experience in Newton's Scientific Thought’, in Koyré, 1968a.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre (1968c). ‘Newton's “Regulae Philosophandi”’, in Koyré, 1968a.Google Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre (1978). Galileo Studies. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Krailsheimer, A. J. (1962). Studies in Self-Interest. From Descartes to La Bruyère. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krailsheimer, A. J. (1980). Pascal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kraus, Pamela A. (1983). ‘From Universal Mathematics to Universal Method: Descartes's “Turn” in Rule IV of the Regulae’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 21:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, Pamela A. (1986). ‘“Whole Method”: The Thematic Unity of DescartesRegulae', Modern Schoolman. 63:.Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill (1988). ‘Moral Philosophy’, in Schmitt, , Skinner, , and Kessler, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraye, Jill (1994). ‘The Transformation of Platonic Love in the Italian Renaissance’, in Baldwin, Anna and Hutton, Sarah (eds.), Platonism and the English Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..Google Scholar
Kremer, K. (1969). Gott und Welt in der klassischen Metaphysik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman (1993). ‘Philosophy of Mind’, in Kretzmann, Norman and Stump, Eleanore (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KretzmannNorman, ; Kenny, Anthony; and Jan, Pinborg (eds.) (1982). The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, L. (1965). The Politics of Discretion. Pufendorf and the Acceptance of Natural Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul O. (1943). The Philosophy of Marsilio Ficino. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul O. (1960). ‘Ludovico Lazzarelli e Giovanni da Correggio, due ermetici del Quattrocento, e il manoscritto II.D.I.4 della Biblioteca degli Ardenti di Viterbo’, in Biblioteca degli Ardenti della Città di Viterbo: Studi e ricerche nel 150° della fondazione. Viterbo: Agnesotti.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul O. (1968). ‘The Myth of Renaissance Atheism and the French Tradition of Free Thought’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 6:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeller, Paul O. (1984). ‘Stoic and Neoplatonic Sources of Spinoza's Ethics’, History of European Ideas. 5:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Dorothea (1993). John Sergeant and His Circle: A Study of Three Seventeenth-Century Aristotelians, ed. Southgate, B. C.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kuksewicz, Z. (1982a). ‘The Potential and the Agent Intellect’, in Kenny, Kretzmann, and , Pinborg 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuksewicz, Z. (1982b). ‘Criticisms of Aristotelian Psychology and the Augustinian-Aristotelian Synthesis’, in Kenny, Kretzmann, and Pinborg, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulstad, M. A. (1980). ‘A Closer Look at Leibniz's Alleged Reduction of Relations’, Southern Journal of Philosophy. 18:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuntz, Marion Daniels (1981). Guillaume Postel, the Prophet of the Restitution of All Things. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Bruyère, Jean (1951). Oeuvres complètes, ed. Benda, J.. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
La Bruyère, Jean (1990). Les caractères, ed. Garapon, R.. Paris, Garnier.Google Scholar
La Forge, Louis (1666). Traitté de l'esprit de l'homme et de ses facultez et fonctions, et de son union avec le corps. Suivant les principes de René Descartes. Paris.Google Scholar
La Forge, Louis (1974). Oeuvres Philosophiques, ed. Clair, P. (Le mouvement des idées au XVIIe siècle). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
La Mothe le Vayer, François (1630–3?). Dialogues faites à l'imitation des anciens. Paris?Google Scholar
La Mothe le Vayer, François (1636). Discours de la contrariété d'humeurs qui se trouve entre certaines nations. Paris.Google Scholar
La Mothe le Vayer, François (1642). De la vertu des payens. Paris.Google Scholar
La Mothe le Vayer, François (1643). De la liberté et de la servitude.Google Scholar
La Mothe le Vayer, François (1662). Oeuvres (2 vols). Paris.Google Scholar
La Mothe le Vayer, François (1669a). Oeuvres … nouvelle édition augmentée de plusieurs nouveaux traittez (15 vols.). Paris: L. Billaine.Google Scholar
La Mothe le Vayer, François (1669b). Discours pour montrer que les doutes de la philosophie sceptique sont de grand usage dans les sciences, in Vayer, La Mothe 1669a, vol. 15.
La Mothe le Vayer, François (1756–9). Oeuvres … nouvelle édition (14 vols.). Dresden.Google Scholar
La Mothe le Vayer, François (1988). Dialogues faits à l'imitation des anciens, ed. Pessel, A.. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
La Peyrère, Isaac (1643). Du rappel des Juifs. Paris.Google Scholar
La Peyrère, Isaac (1655). Prae Adamitae. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
La Peyrère, Isaac (1656). Men before Adam. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
La Rochefoucauld, F. (1705). Réflexions ou Sentences et Maximes morales de Monsieur de la Rochefoucauld, Maximes de Madame la marquise de Sablé. Pensées diverses de M. L.D. et les Maximes chrétiennes de M**** [Madame La Sablière]. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
La Rochefoucauld, F. (1967). Maximes, suivés par des Reflexions diverses, du Portrait de la Rochefoucauld par lui-měme et des Remarques de Christine de Suède sur les Maximes, ed. Truchet, J.. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Labrousse, Elisabeth (1963–4). Pierre Bayle (2 vols.). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Labrousse, Elisabeth (1983). Bayle (Past Masters). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lach, Donald (1953). ‘The Sinophilism of Christian Wolff (1679–1754)’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 14:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lach, Donald (1965). Asia in the Making of Europe: vol. 1, The Century of Discovery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lach, Donald (1968). ‘China in Western Thought and Culture’, vol. 1 of Wiener, Philip P. (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Lagarde, Bernardette (1973). ‘Le De Differentiis de Pléthon d'après l'autographe de la Marcienne’, Byzantion. 43:.Google Scholar
Lagrée, Jacqueline (1994). Juste Lipse et la restauration du stoicisme. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Lai, Yuen-ting (1985). ‘The Linking of Spinoza to Chinese Thought by Bayle and Malebranche’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 23:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, John (1920). A Study in Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laird, John (1924). ‘The Legend of Arnauld's Realism’, Mind. 33:.Google Scholar
Laird, John (1934). Hobbes. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Lalande, A. (1911). ‘Sur quelques textes de Bacon et de Descartes’, Revue de métaphysique et de morale. 19:.Google Scholar
Lambert, Johann Heinrich (1771). Anlage zur Architectonic, vol. 1. Riga.Google Scholar
Lamy, Bernard (1675). L'art de parler. Paris. (2d ed. Paris, 1676; 3d ed. Paris, 1688; 4th ed. Amsterdam, 1699, and Paris, 1701.)Google Scholar
Lamy, Bernard (1683). Entretiens sur les sciences. Grenoble and Paris. (2d ed. Lyon, 1694; 3d. ed. Lyon, 1706.)Google Scholar
Lamy, Bernard (1684). Entretiens sur les sciences. Brussels.Google Scholar
Lamy, Bernard (1966). Entretiens sur les Sciences, ed. Girbal, F. and Clair, P.. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lamy, Dom François (1694–8). De la connoissance de soi-mesme. Paris.Google Scholar
Lamy, Dom François (1696). Le Nouvel athéisme renversé, ou Réfutation du sistème de Spinosa, tirée pour la plupart de la conoissance de la nature de l'homme. Paris.Google Scholar
Lamy, Dom François (1703). Lettres philosophiques sur divers sujets importans. Paris.Google Scholar
Lamy, Dom François (1706). Les premiers élémens des sciences, ou Entrée aux connoissances solides. …Paris.Google Scholar
Lamy, Guillaume (1669). De principiis rerum. Paris.Google Scholar
Landucci, S. (1986). La teodicea nell'eta cartesiana. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Langbein, John H. (1976). Torture and the Law of Proof. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lanion, Pierre [pseud. Wander, Guillaume] (1678). Méditations sur la métaphysique. Paris. (Repr. in Bayle 1684).Google Scholar
Laporte, J. (1950). Le rationalisme de Descartes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles (1984). ‘Descartes' Psychologistic Theory of Assent’, History of Philosophy Quarterly. 1:.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles (1986). ‘La critique newtonienne de la méthode cartésienne’, Dix-huitième siècle. 18:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles (1987a). ‘L'Explication scientifique chez Descartes’, in Grimaldi, and Marion, 1987.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles (1987b). ‘Newton's Critique of Cartesian Method’. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal. 12:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles (1988). ‘La notion de certitude chez Newton’, Revue d'histoire des sciences. 41:.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles (1993). Modernité et morale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswitz, Kurd (1890). Geschichte der Atomistik vom Mittelalter bis Newton (2 vols.). Hamburg and Leipzig: L. Voss.Google Scholar
Lattis, James M. (1994). Between Copernicus and Galileo: Christoph Clavius and the Collapse of Ptolemaic Cosmology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattre, Alain (1967). L'occasionalisme d'Arnold Geulincx: Etude sur la constitution de la doctrine. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Laudan, Laurens (1966). ‘The Clock Metaphor and Probabilism: The Impact of Descartes on English Methodological Thought, 1650–65’, Annals of Science. 22:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurent, Pierre (1982). Pufendorf et la loi naturelle. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Law, Edmund (1734). An Essay on the Origin of Evil by Dr. William King, translated from the Latin with notes, etc. (2 vols.). 2d ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Law, Edmund (1769). A Defence of Mr. Locke's Opinion concerning Personal Identity. Cambridge. (Repr. in Locke 1823, vol. 3.)Google Scholar
Layton, Henry (1698). Observations upon a Short Treatise, Written by Timothy Manlove: Intituled, The Immortality of the Soul Asserted. London.Google Scholar
Le Brun, Charles (1696). ‘Conference sur l'Expression Generate et Particuliere’, in Testelin, Henri, Sentiments des plus habiles peintres sur la practique de la peintures et sculptures mis en tables par Henri Testelin. Paris. (Repr. Geneva: Minkoff, 1972.)Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean (1692). Logica sive ars ratiocinandi. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean (1695). Physica sive de rebus corporeis. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean (1696). De l'incrédulité oú l'on examine les motifs et les raisons générales qui portent les incrédules à rejeter la religion chrétienne. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean (1698). Opera philosophica (4 vols.). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean (1709). De eligenda inter Christianas dissentientes sententia. Amsterdam. (This is appended to his edition of that year of Grotius, De veritate religionis christianae.)Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean (1724). Contra indifferentiam religionum. The Hague. (This is appended to his edition of that year of Grotius, De veritate religionis christianae.)Google Scholar
Le Comte, Louis S.J. (1696). Nouveaux mémoires sur l'etat présent de la Chine. Paris.Google Scholar
Le Coq, Petrus (1626). Disputatio philosophica, continens varias positiones morales,… praeside Francone Burgersdicio…. Leiden.Google Scholar
Le Grand, Antoine (1662). Le Sage des Stoiques ou l'Homme sans Passions. Selon les sentiments de Séneque. The Hague.Google Scholar
Le Grand, Antoine (1665). Les caractères de l'homme sans passions, selon les sentiments de Séneque. Paris.Google Scholar
Le Grand, Antoine (1669). L'Epicure spirituel, ou l'empire de la volupté sur les vertus. Paris.Google Scholar
Le Grand, Antoine (1672). Institutio philosophiae secundum principia R. Descartes…. London.Google Scholar
Le Grand, Antoine (1675). Man without Passion: Or the Wise Stoic according to the Sentiments of Seneca, trans. G. R., London.Google Scholar
Le Grand, Antoine (1679a). Apologia pro R. Des-Cartes contra S. Parkerum…. London.Google Scholar
Le Grand, Antoine (1679b). Institutio philosophiae secundum principia D. Renati Descartes…. Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Le Grand, Antoine (1694). An Entire Body of Philosophy according to the Principles of the Famous Renate Des Cartes, trans. Blome, R.. London.Google Scholar
Le Grand, H. E. (1978). ‘Galileo's Matter Theory’, in Butts, Robert E. and Pitt, Joseph C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Galileo. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Le Moyne, Pierre (1640–3). Les Peintures morales, où les passions sont représentées par tableaux… (3 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Le Moyne, Pierre (1668). La gallerie des femmes fortes, 6th edn. Paris.Google Scholar
Le Rees, François (1642). Cursus philosophicus (3 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Leclerc, Ivor (1986). The Philosophy of Nature (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, vol. 14). Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Henry (1702). Anti-Scepticism: Or, Notes upon Each Chapter of Mr. Lock's Essay concerning Humane Understanding. London. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1984.)Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., and Samuel, Clarke (1717). A Collection of Papers, Which Passed between the Late Learned Mr. Leibnitz and Dr. Clarke in the Years 1715 and 1716. London.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., and Samuel, Clarke (1956). The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence, ed. Alexander, H. G.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., and Samuel, Clarke (1957). Correspondance Leibniz-Clarke, ed. Robinet, André. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1684). ‘Nova methodus pro maximis et minimis, itemque tangentibus, quae nec fractas, nec irrationales quantitates moratur’, Acta Eruditorum, in Ger. Math. V.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1686). ‘De geometria recondita et analysi indivisibilium et infinitorum’, Acta eruditorum. in Ger. Math. V.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1694a). ‘Considérations sur la différence qu'il y a entre l'analyse ordinaire et le nouveau calcul des transcendentes’, Journal des sçavans; in Ger. Math. V.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1694b). ‘Nova calculi differentialis applicatio & usus, ad multiplicem linearum constructionem, ex data tangentium conditione’, Acta eruditorum ; repr. in Ger. Math. V.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1718). ‘Jugement d'un anonyme sur l'original de cet abrégé [De officio]: Avec des reflexions du Traducteur [Barbeyrac]…’ in Pufendorf, S., Les devoirs de l'homme, et du citoien, ed. Barbeyrac, J.. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1765). Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain, in Raspe, R. E. (ed.), Oeuvres philosophiques latines & francoises de feu Mr. de Leibnitz; Tirées de ses manuscrits qui se conservent dans la bibliotheque royale a Hanovre. Amsterdam, and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1768). Leibnitii opera omnia, ed. Dutens, L. (6 vols.). Geneva.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1840). Opera Philosophica quae extant Latina Gallica Germanica Omnia, ed. Erdmann, J. E.. Berlin.Google Scholar
LeibnizGottfried Wilhelm, (1849–63). Mathematische Schriften. ed. Gerhardt, C. I. (7 vols.). Berlin and Halle: Asher, A. et comp. and Schmidt, H. W.. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1962.)Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1854). Réfutation inédite de Spinoza, ed. Careil, A. Foucher. Paris.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1855). ‘Analysis tetragonistica ex centrobarycis’ [October, 1675], in Gerhardt, C. I., Die Entdeckung der höheren Analysis (= Die Geschichte der hōheren Analysis). Halle.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1857). Nouvelles lettres et opuscules inédits de Leibniz, ed. Careil, A. Foucher. Paris.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1860). Theologisches System, ed. and trans. (German) Haas, Carl. Tübingen. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1966.)Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1867). ‘Réponse à la Critique de la Critique de la Recherche de la vérité’, in Rabbe, F., Etude philosophique sur l'Abbé Simon Foucher. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1874). Correspondance de Leibniz avec l'électrice Sophie de Brunswick-Lunebourg, ed. Klopp, O. (3 vols.). Hanover: Kindworth.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1875–90). Die philosophischen Schriften, ed. Gerhardt, C. I. (7 vols.). Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1978.)Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1885). Rechtsphilosophisches aus Leibnizens ungedruckten Schriften, ed. Mollat, G.. Leipzig: Cassel.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1903). Opuscules et fragments inédits, ed. Couturat, L.. Paris: Alcan. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1966.)Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1906). Leibnizens nachgelassene Schriften physikalischen, mechanischen, und technischen Inhalts, ed. Gerland, E.. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1920). The Early Mathematical Manuscripts of Leibniz, ed. and trans. Child, J. M.. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1923–). Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, ed. Deutsche, [before 1945, Preussische] Wissenschaften, Akademie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1948). Textes inédits d'après les manuscrits de la bibliothèque provinciale de Hanovre, ed. Grua, G. (2 vols.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1951). Theodicy, trans. Huggard, E. M.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1957). The Preface to Leibniz' Novissima Sinica, ed., trans., comm. Lach, Donald. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1960). Fragmente zur Logik, ed. Schmidt, F.. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1966). Logical Papers, ed. and trans. Parkinson, G. H. R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1967). The Leibniz-Arnauld Correspondence, ed. and trans. Mason, H. T.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1968). Zwei Briefe über das binäre Zahlensystem und die chinesische Philosophie, trans. (German) Loosen, Renate and Vonessen, Franz. Stuttgart: Belser-Presse.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1969). Philosophical Papers and Letters, ed. and trans. Loemker, L. E.. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1972). The Political Writings of Leibniz, ed. and trans. Riley, Patrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1973). Philosophical Writings, ed. Parkinson, G. H. R., trans. Morris, M. and Parkinson, G. H. R.. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1977). Discourse on the Natural Theology of the Chinese, trans. Cook, Daniel J. and Rosemont, Henry Jr.Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1979a). Analysis particularum, in Die intensionale Logik bei Leibniz und in der Gegenwart, ed. Heinekamp, Albert and Schupp, F. (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1979b). Das Neueste von China (1697) – Novissima Sinica, ed. and trans. (German) Nesselrath, Heinz-Günther and Reinbothe, Hermann. Cologne: Deutsche-China Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1981). New Essays on Human Understanding, trans. Remnant, P. and Bennett, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1982a). Generates inquisitiones de analysi notionum et veritatum, ed. and trans. Schupp, F.. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1982b). Specimen Dynamicum, ed. and trans. (German) by Dosch, H. G., Most, G. W., and Rudolph, E.. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1982–91). Vorausedition zur Reihe VI – philosophische Schriften – in der Ausgabe der Akademie [der Wissenschaften] der DDR [Berlin] (10 vols.). Münster: Leibniz-Forschungssteller der Universität Münster.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1985). Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil, ed. Farrer, A., trans. Huggard, E. M., La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1988). Discourse on Metaphysics and Related Writings, ed. and trans. Martin, R. N. D. and Brown, S.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1989). Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, ed. and trans. Ariew, R. and Garber, D.. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1990). Leibniz korrespondiert mit China: Der Briefwechsel mit den Jesuiten Missionaren (1689–1714), ed. Widmaier, Rita. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1993). Leibniz-Thomasius corresondance 1663–1672, ed. and trans. (French) Bodéüs, Richard. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1994). La réforme de la dynamique: De corporum concursu (1678) et autres textes inédits, ed. and commentary Fichant, Michel. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (forthcoming). The Leibniz-Arnauld Correspondence, ed. Finster, R., trans. Voss, S. (The Yale Leibniz). New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
[Lejeune, Père Antoine de Saint-Pierre] (1646). La vie du R. P. Dom Eustache de S. Paul Asseline, Docteur de Sorbonne & Religieux de la Congregation de Nre Dame de Fueillens [sic]. Ensemble quelques opuscules spirituels utils, aux ames pieuses & religieuses. Le tout recueilly par un Religieux de la mesme Congregation. Paris. (There is a copy of this rare work in the Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris, pressmark 8° Ln27 690.)Google Scholar
Lelevel, H. (1694). La vraye et la fausse metaphysique, ou l'on refute les sentimens de M. Regis sur cette affaire. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Lemaire, P. (1901). Le cartésianisme chez les bénédictins. Dom Robert Desgabets, son système, son influence et son école. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Lenders, W. (1980). ‘Die Theorie der Argumentation bei Leibniz’, in Theoria cum Praxi. Akten des III. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses, Hannover, 12–17.11.1977, bd. III (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas M. (1974a). ‘Occasionalism and the Cartesian Metaphysic of Motion’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. supp. 1:.Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas M. (1974b). ‘The Inherence Pattern and Descartes' Ideas’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 12:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennon, Thomas M. (1977). ‘Jansenism and the Crise Pyrrhonienne’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 38:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennon, Thomas M. (1983a). ‘Locke's Atornism’, Philosophy Research Archives. 9:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennon, Thomas M. (1983b). ‘The Leibnizian Picture of Descartes’, in Shea, William R. (ed.), Nature Mathematized. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas M. (1985). ‘Veritas Filia Temporis: Hume on Time and Causation’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 2:.Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas M. (1993). The Battle of the Gods and Giants; The Legacies of Descartes and Gassendi, 1655–1715. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas M.; John, Nicholas; and John, Davis (eds.) (1982). Problems of Cartesianism. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Lenoble, Robert (1971). Mersenne ou la naissance du mécanisme. 2d ed. Paris: Vrin. (First published in 1943.)Google Scholar
Lenzen, Wolfgang (1990). Das System der Leibnizschen Logik (Grundlagen der Kommunikation und Kognition). Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Ralph, and Muhsin, Mahdi, eds. (1972). Medieval Political Philosophy: A Sourcebook. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, Charles (1721). Theological Works. London.Google Scholar
Lessius, L. (1640). Quinquaginta nomina Dei. Brussels.Google Scholar
Letwin, S. R. (1976). ‘Hobbes and Christianity’, Daedalus (Cambridge, Mass.). 105:.Google Scholar
Levi, Anthony (1964). French Moralists: The Theory of the Passions 1585 to 1649. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lévinas, E. (1983). ‘Sur l'idée de l'infini en nous’, in La passion de la raison. Hommage à F. Alquié, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lévy, Jean-Philippe (1939). La Hiérarchie de preuves dans le droit savant du Moyen-Age. Depuis la Renaissance du droit romain jusqu'à la fin du XIVe siècle (Annales de l'Université de Lyon). Paris: Société Anonyme.Google Scholar
Lewalter, E. (1967). Spanisch-jesuitische und deutsch-lutherische Metaphysik des 17. Jahrhunderts. 2d ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Leyden, W. von (1948). ‘Locke and Nicole: Their Proofs of the Existence of God and Their Attitude towards Descartes’, Sophia (Padova). 16:.Google Scholar
Leyden, W. von (1956). ‘John Locke and Natural Law’, Philosophy. 31:.Google Scholar
Leyden, W. von (1968). Seventeenth-Century Metaphysics. An Examination of Some Main Concepts and Theories. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Lezius, Friedrich (1900). Der Toleranzbegriff Lockes und Pufendorfs. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Gewissensfreiheit. Leipzig: Dieterich (Repr. Darmstadt: Scientia, 1987.)Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, Aharon, (1962). Henry More. The Rational Theology of a Cambridge Platonist. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Henry G., and Robert, Scott (eds.) (1968). A Greek-English Lexicon…. 9th ed., ed. Jones, H. S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberwirth, R. (1955). Christian Thomasius, Sein wissenschaftliches Lebenswerk. Eine Bibliographie. Weimar: H. Böhlaus Nachfolger.Google Scholar
Lievers, Menno (1992). ‘The Molyneux Problem’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 30:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limborch, Philip (1686). Theologia Christiana. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Bo (1976). Naturrätten i Uppsala 1655–1720. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David C. (1967). ‘Alhazen's Theory of Vision and Its Reception in the West’, Isis. 58:.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindberg, David C. (1970). John Pecham and the Science of Optics: Perspectiva communis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David C. (1976). Theories of Vision from al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David C. (ed.) (1978). Science in the Middle Ages (The Chicago History of Science and Medicine). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David C. (1986). ‘The Genesis of Kepler's Theory of Light: Light Metaphysics from Plotinus to Kepler’, Osiris, 2d ser. 2:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindeboom, G. A. (1979). Descartes and Medicine. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus (1586). Epistolarum Centuria Prima. London.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus (1589). Politicorum sive civilis doctrinae libri sex. Lyon.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus (1591). Epistolarum Centuria Secunda. London.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus (1601). Epistolarum Centuria Tertia. Antwerp.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus (1604a). Manuductio ad Stoicam Philosophiam. Antwerp.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus (1604b). Physiologia Stoicorum. Antwerp.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus (1604c). Centuria Singularis ad Italos et Hispanos. Antwerp.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus (1605a). Centuria Singularis ad Germanos et Gallos. Antwerp.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus (1605b). Centuria Singularis ad Belgos. Antwerp.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus (1607). Epistolarum Centuria Quarta. Antwerp.Google Scholar
Lipsius, Justus (1978–). Epistolae, ed. Gerlo, A. et al. Brussels: Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen.Google Scholar
Livet, P. (1978). ‘Le Traitement de l'information dans le Traité des Passions’. Revue philosophique française. 168:.Google Scholar
Livi-Bacci, Massimo (1992). A Concise History of World Population, trans. Ipsen, Carl. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. (1972). ‘On Augustine's Concept of a Person’, in Markus, R. A. (ed.), Augustine: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. (1990). The Anatomy of Neoplatonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve (1984). The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, S. A. (1992). Ideals and Interests in Hobbes'Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1689). Epistola de tolerantia. Gouda.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1690a). An Essay concerning Humane Understanding. London.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1690b). Two Treatises of Government. London.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1690c). A Second Letter concerning Toleration. London.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1692). A Third Letter for Toleration. London.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1693). Some Thoughts concerning Education. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John (1695). The Reasonableness of Christianity. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John (1697a). A Letter to the Right Rev. Edward Ld. Bishop of Worcester…London.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1697b). Mr. Locke's Reply to the Right Rev. the Lord Bishop of Worcester's Answer to His Letter. London.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1699). Mr. Locke's Reply to the Right Rev. the Lord Bishop of Worcester's Answer to His Second Letter. London.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1708). Some Familiar Letters between Mr. Locke, and Several of His Friends. London.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1731). An Abridgment of Mr. Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding, abridged by Wynne, John. 4th ed. London.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1755). Essai Philosophique Concernant L'Entendement Humain, trans. (French) Coste, Pierre. 5th ed. Amsterdam and Leipzig. (Repr. ed. Naert, Emilienne, Paris: Vrin, 1972.)Google Scholar
Locke, John (1812). The Works, 11th ed. (10 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1823). The Works (10 vols.). London. (Repr. Darmstadt: Scientia, 1963.)Google Scholar
Locke, John (1824). The Reasonableness of Christianity, as Delivered in the Scriptures, in The Works of John Locke (9 vols.), vol. 6. London.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1936). An Early Draft of Locke's Essay, together with Excerpts from His Journals, ed. Aaron, R. I. and Gibb, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1953). Lockes's Travels in France 1675–1679, ed. Lough, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1954). Essays on the Law of Nature, ed. Leyden, Wolfgang. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1961). Scritti editi e inediti sulla tolleranza, ed. Viano, C. A.. Turin: Taylor.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1967a). Two Treatises of Government [1689], 2d ed., ed. Laslett, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1967b). Two Tracts on Government, ed. Abrams, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1968). Some Thoughts concerning Education, ed. Axtell, James L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1975). An Essay concerning Human Understanding, ed. Peter, H. Nidditch.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1976). The Correspondence, ed. Beer, E. S. (9 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1987). A Paraphrase and Notes on the Epistles of St. Paul to the Galatians, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Romans, Ephesians, ed. Wainwright, A. W. (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1989). Some Thoughts concerning Education, ed. Yolton, J. W. and Yolton, J. S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1990a). Questions concerning the Law of Nature, ed. and trans. Horwitz, R., Clay, Jenny Strauss, and Clay, Diskin. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1990b). Drafts for the Essay concerning Human Understanding, and other Philosophical Writings, ed. Nidditch, P. H. and Rogers, G. A. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loeb, Louis (1981). From Descartes to Hume. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Loeb, Louis (1992). ‘The Cartesian Circle’, in Cottingham, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loemker, Leroy E. (1955). ‘Boyle and Leibniz’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 16:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loemker, Leroy E. (1972). Struggle for Synthesis: The Seventeenth Century Background of Leibniz's Synthesis of Order and Freedom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohr, Charles H. (1974). ‘Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors A-B’, Studies in the Renaissance. 21:.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lohr, Charles H. (1975). ‘Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors C’, Renaissance Quarterly. 28:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohr, Charles H. (1976). ‘Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors D-F’, Renaissance Quarterly. 29:.Google Scholar
Lohr, Charles H. (1977). ‘Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors G-K’, Renaissance Quarterly. 30:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohr, Charles H. (1978). ‘Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors L-M’, Renaissance Quarterly. 31:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohr, Charles H. (1979). ‘Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors N-Ph’, Renaissance Quarterly. 32:.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lohr, Charles H. (1980). ‘Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors Pi-Sm’, Renaissance Quarterly. 33:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohr, Charles H. (1982). ‘Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors So-Z’, Renaissance Quarterly. 35:.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lohr, Charles [H.] (1986). ‘The Pseudo-Aristotelian Liber de causis and Latin Theories of Science in the Twelfth Century’, in Kraye, J. et al. (eds.), Pseudo-Aristotle in the Middle Ages: The ‘Theology’ and Other Texts. London: Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
Lohr, Charles [H.] (1988). ‘Metaphysics’, in Schmitt, , Skinner, , and Kessler, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1986). Hellenistic Philosophy, 2d ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N. (1987). The Hellenistic Philosophers. Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lounela, J. (1978). Die Logik im XVII. Jahrhundert in Finland (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Dissertationes Humanarum Litterarum). Helsinki: Suamalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. (1908). ‘Kant and the English Platonists’, in Essays Philosophical and Psychological in Honor of William James. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. (1923). ‘Representative Ideas in Malebranche and Arnauld’, Mind. 32:.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. (1924). ‘Reply to Professor Laird’, Mind. 33:.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. (1960). The Great Chain of Being. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Luce, A. A. (1934). Berkeley and Malebranche. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (2d ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.)Google Scholar
Luce, A. A. (1968). ‘Berkeley's Existence in the Mind’, in Martin, C. B. and Armstrong, D. M., Locke and Berkeley: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lucretius, (1659). De la nature des choses, trans. Marolles, Michel. Paris.Google Scholar
Lucretius, (1682a). Les Oeuvres, trans. Parrain, Jacques (2 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Lucretius, (1682b). His Six Books De natura rerum, trans. Creech, Thomas. Oxford.Google Scholar
Luig, K. (1972). ‘Zur Verbreitung des Naturrechts in Europa’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis/Revue d'historie du droit. 40:.Google Scholar
Lukács, , Ladislaus, S. J. (ed.). (1986). Ratio atque institutio studiorum societatis lesu (1586, 1591, 1599) (Monumenta Paedagogica Societatis lesu, vol. 5; Monumenta Historica Societatis lesu, vol. 129). Rome: Institutum Historicum Societatis lesu.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin (1955–86). Works, ed. Pelikan, J. et al. (55 vols.). St. Louis: Concordia, and Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Hugh, and Hargreaves, Mary (1952). Thomas Hobbes: A Bibliography. London: The Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò (1640). The Prince, trans. Dacres, Edward. (Repr. New York: AMS Press, 1967.)Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. (1560). The Art of War, trans. Whitehorne, Peter. London. (Repr. New York: AMS Press, 1967.)Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1984). A Short History of Ethics. London etc.: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1976). Problems from Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, Ian (1977). Woman Triumphant: Feminism in French Literature 1610–1652. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maclean, J. (1959). De historische Outwikkeling der Stootwetten van Aristoteles lot Huygens. Rotterdam: Van Sijn.Google Scholar
Maclean, Kenneth (1962). John Locke and English Literature of the Eighteenth Century. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. (1962). The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Madden, Edward H. (1957). ‘Aristotle's Treatment of Probability and Signs’, Philosophy of Science. 24:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, Edward H. (ed.) (1960). Theories of Scientific Method: The Renaissance Through the Nineteenth Century. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Maddison, R. E. W. (1969). The Life of the Honourable Robert Boyle, F.R.S. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Madeira, Arrais, Duarte, (1650). Novae philosophiae et medicinae de qualitatibus occultis. Lisbon.Google Scholar
Magaillans, (Magalhaes), Gabriel, S. J. (1670). Nouvelle relation de la Chine. Paris.Google Scholar
Magaillans, Magia Naturalis und die Entstehung der modernen Naturwissenschaften (1978). (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft 7). Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Magirus, Johannes (1642). Johannis Magiri Physiologiae Peripateticae libri sex, cum commentariis: additis insuper notis quibusdam marginalibus, in posterioribus editionibus omissis: unà cum definitionibus, divisionibus, axiomatis, Graecè, ex Aristotele petitis. Quibus accessit Caspari Bartholini Malmogii Dani Metaphysica major, scholiis insignibus illustrata, & ab ipso autore edita. Accessit denique Johannis Magiri De memoria artificiosa liber singularis, in quatuor tractatus divisus …Cambridge. (Ist ed. Frankfurt 1597.)Google Scholar
Magnen, Jean Chrysostom (1646). Democritus reviviscens sive de atomis … addita est Democriti vita cum indicibus necessariis. Pavia.Google Scholar
Mahnerus, Adam (1623). Disputatio IV. problematum philosophorum, in Academia Wittenbergensi proposita, praeside lacobo Martini …. Wittenberg.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Edward P. (1982). ‘Sense, Intellect, and Imagination in Albert, Thomas, and Siger’, in Kretzmann, , Kenny, , and Pinborg, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, Michael S. (1968). ‘Another Look at Greek Geometrical Analysis’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 5:.
Mahoney, Michael S. (1980). ‘Christiaan Huygens, The Measurement of Time and Longitude at Sea’, in Bos, H. J. M. et al. (eds.), Studies on Christiaan Huygens. Lisse: Swets.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Michael S. (1990). ‘Barrow's Mathematics: Between Ancients and Moderns’, in Feingold, M. (ed.), Before Newton: The Life and Times of Isaac Barrow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chap. 3.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Michael S. (1993). ‘Algebraic vs. Geometric Techniques in Newton's Determination of Planetary Orbits’, in Theerman, Paul and Seeff, Adele F. (eds.), Action and Reaction: Proceedings of a Symposium to Commemorate the Tercentenary of Newton'sPrincipia. Newark: University of Delaware Press; London and Toronto: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Michael S. (1994). The Mathematical Career of Pierre de Fermat, 2d rev. ed. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. (Ist ed., Princeton, 1973.)Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese (1955). ‘Die naturphilosophische Bedeutung der scholastischen Impetustheorie’, Scholastik. 30:.Google Scholar
Maier, Anneliese (1968). Zwei Grundprobleme der scholastischen Naturphilosophie (3d ed.). Rome: Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Maistrov, L. E. (1974). Probability Theory. A Historical Sketch, trans. Samuel Kotz. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Malagola, Carlo, ed. (1888). Statuti delle universita a dei collegi dello studio Bolognese. Bologna: N. Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1674–5). De la recherche de la verité: ou l'on traitte de la nature de l'esprit de I'homme, & de I'usage qu'il en doit faire pour éviter l'erreur dans les sciences (2 vols). Paris.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1680). Traité de la nature et de la grâce. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1683). Traité de Morale. Cologne.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1688). Entretiens sur la métaphysique. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1708). Entretien d'un philosophe crétien et d'un philosophe chinois sur l'existence et la nature de Dieu. Paris.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1715). Réflexions sur la prémotion physique. Paris.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1948). Entretiens sur la métaphysique. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1958–84). Oeuvres complètes. ed. Robinet, André (20 vols.). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1980a). The Search after Truth, trans. Lennon, T. M. and Olscamp, P. J.. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1980b). Dialogues on Metaphysics, trans. Doney, W.. New York: Abaris Books.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1980c). Dialogue between a Christian Philosopher and a Chinese Philosopher on the Existence and Nature of God, trans. lorio, Dominick A.. Washington, D. C.: Catholic University Press of America.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1992a). Philosophical Selections …, trans. Lennon, T. M., Olscamp, P. J. et al., ed. Nadler, Steven. Indianapolis, Ind., and Cambridge, Mass.: Hackett.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1992b). Treatise on Nature and Grace, trans. , Patrick Riley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malherbe, Michel (1984). Thomas Hobbes ou l'oeuvre de la raison. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Mallet, Charles Edward (1968). A History of the University of Oxford (3 vols.). New York and London: Barnes and Noble and Methuen.Google Scholar
Malvezzi, Virgilio (1632). Il Tarquinio superbo. Bologna.Google Scholar
Malvezzi, Virgilio (1634). Davide perseguitato. Bologna.Google Scholar
Malvezzi, Virgilio (1648). Considerazioni con occasione d'alcuni luoghi delle vite d'Alcibiade e di Coriolano. Bologna.Google Scholar
Mandonnet, Pierre Félix. (1908–11). Siger de Brabant et l'averroisme latin au XIIIe siècle (2 vols.). Louvain: Institut Supérieur de Philosophic de l'Université de Louvain.Google Scholar
Mandrou, Robert (1980). Magistrats et sorciers en France au XVIIe siècle: Une Analyse de psychologie historique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Manlove, Timothy (1697). The Immortality of the Soul Asserted, and Practically Improved. London.Google Scholar
Manuel, Frank (1963). Isaac Newton, Historian. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Manuel, Frank (1974). The Religion of Isaac Newton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marana, G. P. (1753). Letters Writ by a Turkish Spy (8 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Marandé, Léonard (1642). Abrégé curieux de toute la philosophie. Paris.Google Scholar
Marci, Kronland, Marcus, Joannis (1639). De proportione motus, seu Regula sphygmica ad celeritatem et tarditatem pulsuum ex illius motu ponderibus geometricis librato absque errore metiendam. Authore loanne Marco Marci Philac et Medicac Doctore et ordinario Professore eiusdam Medic. facultatis in Universitate Pragensi, Physico Reg. Boh. Prague. (Repr. in Acta historiae rerum naturalium necnon technicarum: Czechoslovak Studies in the History of Science, No. 3 (Special Issue, 1967):.)Google Scholar
Marci, Kronland, Marcus, Joannis (1683). Otho-sophia, seu Philosophia impulsus universalis Joannis Marci Marci à Kronland, Boëmi Landskronensis … opus posthumunt nuperrimè in ejusdem authoris liturgia mentis promissum … nunc primum cum aenis figuris in lucem editum à Jacobo Joanne Wenceslao Dobrzensky de Nigro Ponte. …Prague.Google Scholar
Marías-Aguilera, Julian (1954). ‘San Anselmo y el Insensate’, in Marías-Aguilera, J. (ed.), San Anselmo y el insensato: y otros estudios de filosofia, 2d ed., Madrid: Revista de Occidente.Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1975). Sur l'ontologie grise de Descartes. Paris: Vrin. (2d ed. 1981.)Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1977). L'idole et la distance. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1981). Sur la thèologie blanche de Descartes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1982). Dieu sans l'être. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1985). ‘De la crèation des vèritès èternelles au principe de raison suffisante. Remarques sur l'anti-cartèsianisme de Spinoza, Malebranche et Leibniz’, XVIIe siécle. 147:.Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1986a). Sur le prisme métaphysiaue de Descartes. Constitution et limites de l'onto-thèo-logie dans la pensèe cartésienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1986b). ‘The Essential Incoherence of Descartes’ Definition of Divinity’, in Rorty 1986a.Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1987). ‘Le statut mètaphysique du Discours de la Méthode’, in Marion, Jean-Luc and Grimaldi, Nicolas (eds.), Le Discours et sa mèthods. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1991a). Questions Cartésiennes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1991b). ‘The Coherence of Spinoza's Definitions of God in Ethics I, Proposition II’, in Yovel, Y. (ed.), God and Nature: Spinoza's Metaphysics. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1991c). God without Being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Trans, of , Marion 1982.)Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1992). ‘Is the Ontological Argument Ontological?’, journal of the History of Philosophy. 30:2.Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. (1994). “Entre analogic et principe de raison — la causa sui’, in Beyssade, J.-M. and Marion, J.-L., eds., Descartes. Méditer, objecter, répondre. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Mark, T. C. (1977). ‘The Spinozistic Attributes’, Philosophia. 7:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markie, Peter (1992). ‘The Cogito and Its Importance’, in Cottingham, J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marks, Carol L. (1966). ‘Thomas Traherne and Cambridge Platonism’, Publications of the Modern Language Association. 81:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, R. A. (1967). ‘Augustine: Biographical Introduction: Christianity and Philosophy’, in Armstrong, 1967.Google Scholar
Marlin, Randal (1985). ‘Cartesian Freedom and the Problem of the Mesland Letters’, in Moyal, Georges J. D. and Tweyman, Stanley (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Politics: Essays in Honour of Robert F. McRae. Delmar N.Y.: Caravan.Google Scholar
Marshall, John (1994). John Locke. Resistance, Religion, and Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Gottfried (1964). Leibniz, Logic and Metaphysics, trans. Northcott, K. J. and Lucas, P. G.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, H.-J. (1969). Livre, Pouvoirs et Sociètè á Paris au XVIIe siécle (1598–1701) (2 vols.). Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Martin, Julian (1992). Francis Bacon, the State, and the Reform of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martini, Martino S. J. (1658). Sinicae historiae decas prima. Munich.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. (1992). The Two Gods of Leviathan: Tliomas Hobbes on Religion and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mas, Diego (1599). Commentarii in universam philosophiam Arislotelis (2 vols.). Valencia.Google Scholar
Maséres, Francis (1795). The Doctrine of Permutations and Combinations. London.Google Scholar
Massa, Daniel (1977). ‘Giordano Bruno's Ideas in Seventeenth-Century England’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 38:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massault, J. P. (1961). ‘Thomisme et Augustinisme dans l'apologètique du 17éme siécle’, Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques. 44:.Google Scholar
Mates, Benson (1980). ‘Nominalism and Evander's Sword’, in Theoría cum Praxi. Akten des III. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses, Hannover, 12–17.11.1977, bd. III (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa 21). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Mates, Benson (1986). The Philosophy of Leibniz: Metaphysics and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matheron, Alexandre (1969). Individu et communauté chez Spinoza. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Matheron, Alexandre (1971). Le Christ et le salut des ignorants chez Spinoza. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Mattern, R[uth]. M. (1980b). ‘Locke on Active Power and the Obscure Idea of Active Power from Bodies’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. 11:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattern, Ruth (1980a). ‘Moral Science and the Concept of Person in Locke’, Philosophical Review. 89:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, Marcel (1972). A General Theory of Magic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel (1985). ‘A Category of the Human Mind: The Notion of Person; the Notion of Self’, trans. Halls, W. D., in Carrithers, M., Collins, S., Lukes, S. (eds.), The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mautner, Thomas (1986). ‘Pufendorf and Eighteenth-Century Scottish Philosophy’, in Samuel von Pufendorf 1632–1982, ed. Modéer, K. Å.. Stockholm: Nordiska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
May, William E. (1962). ‘The God of Leibniz’, New Scholasticism. 36:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, Thomas Franklin (1934). Epicurus in England (1650–1725). Dallas: Southwest Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Edwin (1985). ‘Lockean Mechanism’, in Holland, A. J. (ed.), Philosophy, Its History and Historiography. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
McCann, Edwin (1987). ‘Locke on Identity: Matter, Life, and Consciousness’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 69:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClaughlin, Trevor (1979). ‘Censorship and Defenders of the Cartesian Faith in Mid-Seventeenth Century France’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 40:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McColley, Grant (1939). ‘Nicholas Hill and the Philosophia Epicurea’, Annals of Science. 4:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCracken, Charles J. (1983). Malebranche and British Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCracken, Charles J. (1986), ‘Stages on a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 24:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, Laurence B. (1977). ‘Leibniz on the Identity of Relations’, Southwestern Journal of Philosophy. 8:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, Laurence B. (1978). ‘Leibniz and Traditional Philosophy’, Studia Leibnitiana. 10:.Google Scholar
McCullough, Laurence B. (1988). ‘Leibniz on Individuals and Individuation: How the Mature Philosophy Resolves Problems of the Earliest Philosophy’, in Heinekamp, A. (ed.), Leibniz. Tradition und Aktualität. V. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress. Vortrāge. Hannover: Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschafte.Google Scholar
McEvoy, James (1982). The Philosophy of Robert Grosseteste. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGrath, A. E. (1985). Luther's Theology of the Cross: Martin Luther's Theological Breakthrough. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McGrath, A. E. (1986). lustitia Dei. A History of the Christian Doctrine of Justification (2 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E. (1967). ‘Transmutation and Immutability: Newton's Doctrine of Physical Qualities’, Ambix. 14:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. E. (1968). ‘Force, Active Principles and Newton's Invisible Realm’, Ambix. 15:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. E. (1970). ‘Atoms and the “Analogy of Nature”: Newton's Third Rule of Philosophizing’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. 1:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. E. (1972). ‘Boyle's Conception of Nature’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 33:.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, J. E. (1977). ‘Neoplatonism and Active Principles: Newton and the Corpus Hermeticum’, in Westman, and McGuire, 1977.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. E. (1978a). ‘Existence, Actuality and Necessity: Newton on Space and Time’, Annals of Science. 35:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. E. (1978b). ‘Newton on Place, Time, and God: An Unpublished Source’, British Journal for the History of Science. 11:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J. E., and Rattansi, P. M. (1966). ‘Newton and the “Pipes of Pan’”, Notes and Records of the Royal Society. 21:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, Michael (1976). ‘Sabbatai Zevi in England’, Association for Jewish Studies Review. 1:.Google Scholar
McLachlan, H. J. (1951). Socinianism in Seventeenth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter (1993). ‘Descartes on Mind–Body Interaction and the Conservation of Motion’, Philosophical Review. 102:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullin, Ernan (ed.) (1965). The Concept of Matter in Greek and Medieval Philosophy. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan (1978a). Newton on Matter and Activity. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan (1978b). ‘The Conception of Science in Galileo's Work’, in Robert, E. Butts and Joseph, C. Pitt (eds.), New Perspectives on Galileo. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan (1978c). The Concept of Matter in Modern Philosophy. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
McMurrich, J. P. (1913). ‘The Legend of the “Resurrection Bone”’, Transactions of the Royal Canadian Institute. 9:.Google Scholar
McNeill, J. T. (1946). ‘Natural Law in the Teaching of the Reformers’, Journal of Religion. 26:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeilly, F. S. (1968). The Anatomy of Leviathan. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McRae, Robert (1965). ‘“Idea” as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth Century’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 26:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRae, Robert (1972). ‘Innate Ideas’, in Butler, R. J. (ed.) Cartesian Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McRae, Robert (1976). Perception, Apperception, and Thought. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
McRae, Robert (1985). ‘Miracles and Laws’, in Okruhlik, K. and Brown, J. (eds.), The Natural Philosophy of Leibniz. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Mèchoulan, Henry (1987). ‘Introduction’ to Israel, Menasseh ben, The Hope of Israel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mèchoulan, Henry (1989). ‘Menasseh ben Israel and the World of the Non-Jew’, in Kaplan, Y., Mèchoulan, H., and Popkin, R. (eds.), Menasseh ben Israel and His World. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mede, Joseph (1651). Claris Apocalyptica, or a Prophetical Key. London. (First published in Latin, Cambridge, 1627.)Google Scholar
Medick, H. (1973). Naturzustand und Naturgeschichte der bürgerlichen Gesellschafi. Die Ursprünge der bürgerlichen Socialtheorie als Geschichtsphilosophie und Sozialwissenschaft bei Samuel Pufendorf, John Locke und Adam Smith. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Mehta, Uday Singh (1992). The Anxiety of Freedom. Imagination and Individuality in Locke's Political Thought. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Meinel, Christoph (1988a). ‘Early Seventeenth-century Atomism: Theory, Epistemology and the Insufficiency of Experiment’, Isis. 79:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinel, Christoph (1988b). “‘Das letzte Blatt im Buch der Nature’: Die Wirklichkeit der Atome und die Antinomic der Anschauung in den Korpuskutartheorien der frühen Neuzeit’, Studia Leibnitiana. 20:.Google Scholar
Meinel, Christoph (1988c). ‘Empirical Support for the Corpuscular Theory in the Seventeenth Century’, in Batens, Diderik and Bendegem, Jean Paul (eds.), Theory and Experiment. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Melanchthon, Philipp (1834–60). Opera quae supersunt omnia, ed. Bretschneider, C. G. (28 vols.). Halle: Schwetschke.Google Scholar
Melles, Etienne (1669a). Novum Iotius philosophiae syntagma … Pars de moribus. Paris.Google Scholar
Mènage, Gilles (1690). Historia mulierum philosopharum. Lyon.Google Scholar
Menasseh, ben Israel (1636). De Resurrectione Mortuorum. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Menasseh, ben Israel (1656). Vindicae Judaeorum (London).Google Scholar
Menasseh, ben Israel (1987). The Hope of Israel, ed. Mèchoulan, and Nahon, , trans. Moses, Wall. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mendoza, Juan Gonzalez (1585). Historia de la cosas, ritos, y costumbres, del gran Reyno de la China. Rome. (Rev. ed. Rome, , 1586.)Google Scholar
Menjot-d'Elbenne, S., , Vicomte (1923). Mme de la Sabliére, ses pensèes chrètiennes et ses lettres a l'abbè de Rancèd. Paris: Plon-Nourrit.Google Scholar
Menzel, Johanna (1956). ‘The Sinophilism of J. H. G. Justi’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 17:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Christia (1990). ‘The Seventeenth-Century Debate between the Moderns and the Aristotelians: Leibniz and the Philosophia Reformata’, in Marchlewitz, I. and Heinekamp, A. (eds.), Leibniz' Auseinandersetzung mit Vorgängern und Zeitgenossen (Studia Leibniziana Supplementa, 27). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Mercer, Christia (1993). ‘The Vitality and Importance of Early Modern Aristotelianism’, in Sorell, Tom (ed.). The Rise of Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mercer, Christia (forthcoming). Leibniz's Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merchant, Carolyn (1979). ‘The Vitalism of Anne Conway: Its Impact on Leibniz's Concept of the Monad’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 17:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn (1980). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin (1623). Quaestiones celeberimae in Genesim. Paris.Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin (1624). L'impiètè des dèistes, athèes et libertins de ce temps, combatue et renversèe (2 vols.). Paris. (Repr. (vol. I) Stuttgart: Frommann, 1975.)Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin (1625). La veritè des sciences. Paris. (Repr. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1969.)Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin (1634). Questions thèologiques; Les mèchaniques de Galitèe; Les Prèludes de l'harmonie universelle. Paris.Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin (1636–7). Harmonie Universelle contenant la theorie et la pratique de la musique. Paris.Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin (1644a). Cogitata physico-mathematica. Paris.Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin (1644b). Universae geometriae mixtaeque mathematicae synopsis. Paris.Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin (1932–88). Correspondance du P. Marin Mersenne, religieux minime, ed. Waard, C.de et al. (17 vols.). Paris: Beauchesne (vol. I). Presses Universitaires de France (vols. 2–4), CNRS (vols. 5–17).Google Scholar
Mersenne, Marin (1985). Questions Inouyes, ed. Pessel, Andrè. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Meslier, J. (1972). ‘Anti-Fènelon’ (Deprun, J., ed.), in euvres complétes, ed. Deprun, J., Desnè, R., and Soboul, A. (3 vols.), vol. 3. Paris: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Mesnard, Pierre (1936). Essai sur la morale de Descartes. Paris: Boivin & Cie.Google Scholar
Metzger, Hèléne (1938). Attraction universelle et religion naturelle chez quelques commentateurs anglais de Newton. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Metzger, Hèléne (1969). Les Doctrines chimiques en France du dèbut du XVII' à la fin du XVIII diècle. Paris: Blanchard.Google Scholar
Meuvret, Jean (1971). ‘Les donnèes dèmographiques et statistiques en histoire moderne et contemporaine’, in Jean, Meuvret, Etudes d'histoire èconomique. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Meyer, Louis [Meijer, Lodewijk] (1666). Philosophia S. Scripturae interpres. ‘Eleutheropolis’. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Meyer, Louis [Meijer, Lodewijk] (1988). La Philosophie interpréte de l'Ecriture Sainte, trans. (French) Lagrèe, J. and Moreau, P.. Paris: Intertextes éditeur.Google Scholar
Meyer, Michael (1991). Le Philosophic el les Passions. Paris: Librairie Gènèrate Française.Google Scholar
Meylan, P. (1937). Jean Barbeyrac (1674–1744). Lausanne: F. Rouge.Google Scholar
Michael, Reuven (1971). ‘Spaeth, Johann Peter’, in Encyclopaedia Judaica (16 vols.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Michel, P.- H. (1973). The Cosmology of Giordano Bruno. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Micraelius, Johann (1653). Lexicon Philosophicum. Jena.Google Scholar
Micraelius, Johann (1662). Lexicon Philosophicum, 2d ed. Stettin.Google Scholar
Mijuskovic, Ben Lazare (1974). The Achilles of Rationalist Arguments (International Archives of the History of Ideas). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Milano, Andrea (1969). ‘Magia e teologia in Tommaso Campanella’, in Tommaso Campanella nel IV centenario della sua nascita. (1568–1968). Naples: EDI-Sapienza.Google Scholar
Millen, Ron (1985). ‘The Manifestation of Occult Qualities in the Scientific Revolution’, in , Margaret J. Osier and Farber, P. L. (eds.), Religion, Science and Worldview, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milton, J. R. (1981a). ‘The Origin and Development of the Concept of the “Laws of Nature”’, Archives europèene de sociologie. 22:.Google Scholar
Milton, J. R. (1918b). ‘John Locke and the Nominalist Tradition’, in Brandt, R. (ed.), John Locke. Symposium Wolfenbüttel 1979. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Milton, J. R. (1985). ‘Lockean Mechanism: A Comment’, in Holland, A. J. (ed.), Philosophy, Its History and Historiography, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Milton, John (1931–8). The Works of John Milton, ed. Patterson, Frank Allen et al. (18 vols.), New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mintz, Samuel I. (1962). The Hunting of Leviathan: Seventeenth-Century Reactions to the Materialism and Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mittelstrass, Jürgen (1981). ‘Substance and Its Concept in Leibniz’, in Parkinson, G. H. R. (ed.), Truth, Knowledge and Reality, Inquiries into the Foundations of Seventeenth Century Rationalism (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft 9). Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Modèer, K. Å. (ed.) (1986). Samuel von Pufendorf 1632–1982 (Skrifter Utgivna av Institutet för Rättshistorisk Forskning, Ser. II: Rättshistoriska Studier 12). Stockholm: Nordiska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Molina, Luis (1953). Libert arbitrii cum gratiae donis, divina praescientia, providentia, praedestinatione et reprobatione concordia (Lisbon, 1588; 2d ed. Antwerp, 1595), ed. Oña, Johann Rabeneck S.J.: Collegium maximum S. I. and Madrid: Soc. edit. ‘Sapientia’.Google Scholar
Molina, Luis (1988). On Divine Foreknowledge, trans. Freddoso, Alfred. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Molinos, Miguel (1909). The Spiritual Guide, ed. Lyttleton, Kathleen. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Moll, Konrad (1978). Der junge Leibniz (2 vols.). Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Molland, A. G. (1982). ‘The Atomisation of Motion: A Facet of the Scientific Revolution’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 13:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondadori, Fabrizio (1990). Review of The Philosophy of Leibniz, by Mates, Benson, Philosophical Review. 99:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monod, Albert (1916). De Pascal á Chateaubriand: Les dèfenseurs français du christianisme de 1670 é 1802. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Monsarrat, Gilles D. (1984). Light from the Porch: Stoicism and English Literature. Paris: Didier-Erudirion.Google Scholar
Montagnes, B. (1963). La doctrine de l'analogie de l'être d'aprés saint Thomas d'Aquin. Paris and Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel (1922). Les Essais de Michel de Montaigne, ed. Villey, Pierre. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel (1962a). Essais, ed. Rat, M. (2 vols.). Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel (1962b). Oeuvres complétes. ed. Thibaudet, Albert and Rat, Maurice. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Moore, J. (1991). ‘Theological Politics: A Study of the Reception of Locke's Two Treatises of Government in England and Scotland in the Early Eighteenth Century, in Thompson, M., ed., Locke and Kant. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Moore, J., and , Silverthorne M. (1983). ‘Gershom Carmichael and the Natural Jurisprudence Tradition in Eighteenth-century Scotland’, in Hont, I. and Ignatieff, M. (eds.), Wealth and Virtue. The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, J. and Silverthorne, M. (1984). ‘Natural Sociability and Natural Rights in the Moral Philosophy of Gerschom Carmichael’, in Hope, V. (ed.), Philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1646). Democritus Platonissans: Or, An essay upon the Infinity of Worlds out of Platonick Principles. Cambridge.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1653). An Antidote against Atheisme, or an Appeal to the Natural Faculties of the Minde of Man, Whether There Be Not a God. London.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1656). Enthusiasmus triumphatus. London and Cambridge.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1659). The Immortality of the Soule, So Farre Forth As It Is Demonstrable from the Knowledge of Nature and the Light of Reason. London.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1662a). A Collection of Several Philosophical Writings of Dr Henry More. …London (Repr. New York: Garland, 1978.)Google Scholar
More, Henry (1662b). Henrici Mori Epistolae ad Renatum Descartes. London. In More 1662a.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1662c). An Antidote against Atheism, or An Appeal to the Natural Faculties of the Mind of Man, Whether there be not a God. 3d ed. London. In More 1662a.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1662d). The Immortality of the Soul. London. In More 1662a.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1662e). Enthusiasmus Triumphatus, or, A Brief Discourse of the Nature, Causes, Kinds, and Cure of Enthusiasm. London. In More 1662a.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1664). The Apology of Dr Henry More …London.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1668). Divine Dialogues, Containing Sundry Disquisitions and Instructions concerning the Attributes and Providence of God. The Three First Dialogues Treating of the Attributes of God, and His Providence at Large. Collected and Compiled by the Care and Industry of F. P. [Franciscus Palaeopolitanus] (2 vols.). London.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1671). Enchiridion metaphysicum: sive, de rebus incorporeis succincta & luculenta dissertatio. Pars prima: de exsistentia & natura rerum incorporearum in genere. In qua quamplurima mundi phaenomena ad leges Cartesii mechanicas obiter expenduntur, illiúsque philosophiae, & aliorum omniuo omnium qui mundana phaenomena in causas puré mechanicas solvi posse supponunt, vanitas falsitásque detegitur. London.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1675–9). Opera omnia (3 vols.). London.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1677a). Fundamenta Philosophiae sive Cabbalae Aëto-Paedomelissaeae, in Rosenroth, Knorr 1677, ‘Apparatus in Librum Sohar, pars secunda’.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1677b). ‘Ad Clarrissimum … Virum, N. N. De Rebus in amica sua responsione contentis ulterior disquisitio’, in Rosenroth, Knorr 1677.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1679a). Opera philosophica (2 vols.). London. (= More 1975–9, vols. 2–3.)Google Scholar
More, Henry (1679b). Enchiridion ethicum, praecipua moralis philosophiae ntdimenta complectens. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1680). Apocalysis Apocalypseos; Or, the Revelation of St. John the Divine Unveiled. London. More, Henry (1681). A Plain and Continued Exposition of the Several Prophecies or Divine Visions of the Prophet Daniel. London.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1690). An Account of Virtue or Dr More's Abridgment of Morals Put into English, trans. Southwell, E.. London.Google Scholar
More, Henry (1713). Divine Dialogues, containing Sundry Disquisitions and Instructions concerning the Attributes and Providence of God. Collected and Compiled by the Care and Industry of Franciscus Palaeopolitanus [Henry More].…London. (First ed., London, 1668.)Google Scholar
More, Henry (1980). The Immortality of the Soul, ed. Jacob, A.. The Hague: Martinus Nijhof.Google Scholar
More, Louis Trenchard (1944). The Life and Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moreau, Joseph (1967). Pour ou contre l'insensé? Essais sur la preuve anselmienne. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Morford, Mark (1991). Stoics and Neostoics: Rubens and the Circle of Lipsius. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moriconi, E. (1980). ‘Sul concetto di relazione di Leibniz’, Annali della Scuola normale superiore di Pisa. 10:.Google Scholar
Morin, Jean-Baptiste (1635). Quod Deus sit. Paris.Google Scholar
Morisanus, Bernardus (1625). In Aristotelis logicam, physicam, ethicam apotelesma. …Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Mormino, Gianfranco (1990). ‘La relatività del movimento negli scritti sull'urto di Christiaan Huygens’, in De motu: studi di storia del pensiero su Galileo, Hegel, Huygens e Gilbert (Università degli Studi di Milano, Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia. Quaderni di Acme 12). Milan: Cisalpino, Istituto Editoriale Universitario.Google Scholar
Mormino, Gianfranco (1993). Penetralia motus. La fondazione relativistica della meccanica in Christiaan Huygens, con l'edizione del “Codex Hugeniorum 7A” (Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di Lettere et Filosofia dell'Università di Milano, CLIII. Sezione a cura del Dipartimento di Filosofia, 21). Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Morpurgo-Tagliabue, Guido (1963). I processi di Galileo e l'epistemologia. Milan: Edizioni di Comunità.Google Scholar
Moscato, A. (1968). ‘Il libertinismo’, in Il pensiero moderno (Secoli 17–18), vol. 12 of Grande Antologia Filosofica. Milan: Carlo Mazorati.Google Scholar
Mossner, E. C. (1948). ‘Hume's Early Memoranda 1729–1740’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 9:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossner, E. C. (1954). The Life of David Hume. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Mossner, E. C. (1959). “Did Hume Ever Read Berkeley?”: A Rejoinder to Professor Popkin', Journal of Philosophy. 56:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulin, Pierre Du (1644). La philosophie, mise en francois, et divisee en trois parties, scavoir, elements de la logique, la physique ou science naturelle, l'ethyque ou science morale. Paris.Google Scholar
Mouy, Paul (1934). Le développement de la physique cartésienne 1646–1712. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Moyal, Georges J.D. (1987). ‘The Unity of Descartes' Conception of Freedom’, International Studies in Philosophy. 19:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugnai, M. (1978). ‘Bemerkungen zu Leibniz' Theorie der Relationen’, Studia Leibnitiana. 10:.Google Scholar
Mugnai, M. (1979). ‘Intensionale Kontexte und termini reduplicativi in der Grammatica rationis von Leibniz’, in Die intensionale Logik bei Leibniz und in der Gegenwart, ed. Heinekamp, Albert and Schupp, F. (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Mugnai, M. (ed.) (1990). ‘Leibniz's Logic’. Topoi. 9:.Google Scholar
Mugnai, M. (1992). Leibniz's Theory of Relations (Studia Leibniziana, Supplementa). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Muirhead, John H. (1931). The Platonic Tradition in Anglo-Saxon Philosophy. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Müller-Jahncke, Wolf-Dieter (1985). Astrologisch-magische Theorie und Praxis in der Heilkunde der frühen Neuzeit. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Multhauf, Robert P. (1966). The Origins of Chemistry (Oldbourne History of Science Library). London: Oldbourne.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, R. J. (1968). ‘The Early Development of Leibniz's concept of Justice’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 29:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mungello, D. E. (1977). Leibniz and Confucianism: The Search for Accord. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Mungello, D. E. (1980). ‘Malebranche and Chinese Philosophy’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 41:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mungello, D. E. (1985). Curious Land: Jesuit Accommodation and the Origins of Sinology. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Mungello, D. E. (1987). ‘Aus den Anfängen der Chinakunde in Europa 1687–1770’, in Walravens, Harmut (ed.), China illustrata; Das europäische Chinaverständnis im Spiegel des 16. bis 18. Jahrhundert. Weinheim: Acta Humaniora, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Munitz, Milton K. (ed.) (1957). Theories of the Universe: from Babylonian Myth to Modern Science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
MuñozDelgado, V. Delgado, V. (1982). ‘Lógica hispano-portuguesa e iberoamericana en el siglo XVII. Introdución doctrinal. Bibliografia. Fuentes impresas y manuscritas’, Cuadernos Salmantinos de filosofia. 9:.Google Scholar
Munz, P. (1952). The Place of Hooker in the History of Thought. London: Routledge and Paul.Google Scholar
Murdoch, John E., and Sylla, Edith D. (1978). ‘The Science of Motion’, in Lindberg, 1978.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven (1988a). ‘Arnauld, Descartes, and Transubstantiation: Reconciling Cartesian Metaphysics and Real Presence’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 49:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven (1988b). ‘Cartesianism and Port-Royal’, Monist. 71:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven (1989). Arnauld and the Cartesian Philosophy of Ideas. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven (1990). ‘Deduction, Confirmation, and the Laws of Nature in Descartes's Principia Philosophiae’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 28:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven (1992). Malebranche and Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven (1993a). ‘Occasionalism and General Will in Malebranche’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 31:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven (ed.) (1993b). Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven (1993c). ‘The Occasionalism of Louis de la Forge’, in Nadler, 1993b.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven (1994). ‘Descartes and Occasional Causation’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 2:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven forthcoming. ‘Occasionalism and the Mind–Body Problem’, in Stewart, M. A. (ed.), Oxford Studies in the History of Philosophy 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nagel, Ernst (1955). Principles of the Theory of Probability (International Encyclopedia of Unified Science). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1959). ‘Hobbes's Concept of Obligation’, Philosophical Review. 68:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namer, Emile (1980). La Vie et l'oeuvre de J.C. Vanini, Prince des libertins, mort à Toulouse sur le bûcher en 1619. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Napoli, A. and Canziani, G., eds. (1990). Hobbes oggi (Atti del convegno 1988). Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Nardi, Bruno (1965). Studi su Pietro Pomponazzi. Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Naudé, Gabriel (1623). Instruction a la France sur la verité de l'histoire des freres de la roze-croix. Paris.Google Scholar
Naudé, Gabriel (1625). Apologie pour tous les grands personnages qui ont esté faussement soupçonnez de magie. Paris.Google Scholar
Naudé, Gabriel (1627). Advis pour dresser une bibliothèque. Paris.Google Scholar
Naudé, Gabriel (1649). Iugement de tout ce qui esté imprimé contre le Cardinal Mazarin, depuis le sixiéme lanvier iusques à la declaration du premier Avril mil six cens quarante-neuf. n.p.Google Scholar
Naudé, Gabriel (1701). Naudeana et Patiniana ou Singularitez remaquables prises des conversations des mess. Naudé et Patin. Paris.Google Scholar
Naudé, Gabriel (1950). Advice on Publishing a Library, ed. Taylor, Archer. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nauert, Charles G. (1965). Agrippa and the Crisis of Renaissance Thought. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph (1951). ‘Human Laws and the Laws of Nature in China and the West’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 12:.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph (1959). Science and Civilization in China. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, William R. (1991). The Summa Perfectionis of Pseudo-Geber: A Critical Edition, Translation and Study. Collection des Travaux de l'Académie Internationale d'Histoire des Sciences, t. 35. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Newman, William R. (1993). ‘The Corpuscular Theory of J. B. Van Helmont and Its Medieval Sources’, Vivarium. 31:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1672). ‘A Serie's of Quere's Propounded by Mr. Isaac Newton, to Be Determin'd by Experiment, Positively and Directly Concluding His New Theory of Light and Colours; and Here Recommended to the Industry of the Lovers of Experimental Philosophy’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 7:5004–7.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1687). Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. London. (2d ed. London 1713; 3d. ed. London 1726.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1704). Opticks. London.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1714–15). ‘An Account of the Book entituled Commercium Epistolicum’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 29:.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1730). Opticks, or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light. 4th ed. London.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1733). Observations on Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John. London.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1779–85). Isaaci Newtoni opera quae exstant omnia (5 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1934). Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, trans. Motte, Andrew, rev. Cajori, Florian. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1952). Opticks, or A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light (based on the 4th ed., London, 1730), foreword Einstein, Albert, intro. Whittaker, Edmund, pref. Cohen, BernardI, Analytical Table of Contents prep. Roller, Duane H. D.. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1958). Isaac Newton's Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy and Related Document, ed. Cohen, B.I and Schofield, R. E.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1959–77). The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, ed. Turnbull, H. W., Scott, J. F., Hall, A. R., Tilling, Laura (7 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1962). Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, ed. Hall, C. R. and Hall, M. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1967–81). The Mathematical Papers of Isaac Newton, ed. Whiteside, D. T. (8 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1972). Isaac Newton's Philosophia Naturalis Principia Mathematica: The Third Edition with Variant Readings, ed. Koyré, Alexandre, Cohen, BernardI, and Whiteman, Anne (2 vols.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1978). Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy, ed. Cohen, BernardI. 2d ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1983). Certain Philosophical Questions: Newton's Trinity Notebook, ed. McGuire, J. E. and Tamny, Martin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1984–). Optical Papers of Isaac Newton, ed. Shapiro, A. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, of Amiens (1855). De arte seu articulis fidei catholicae, in Migne, J.-P. (ed.), Patrologia latina. Paris, vol. 210.Google Scholar
Nicholas, John (1978). ‘Newton's Extremal Second Law’, Centaurus. 22:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolaus, of Autrecourt (1964). ‘The First Letter to Bernard of Arezzo’, trans. Moody, E. A., in Shapiro, Herman (ed.), Medieval Philosophy: Selected Readings from Augustine to Buridan. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Nicole, Pierre (1679). Essais de morale (2d ed.). Paris.Google Scholar
Nicole, Pierre (1684). Les prétendus reformez convaincus de schisme. Brussels.Google Scholar
Nicole, Pierre (1730). Essais de morale (13 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Nicole, Pierre (1755). Oeuvres de controverse de M. Nicole (6 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Nicolson, M. H. (1930). The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and their Friends, 1642–1684. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolson, M. H., and Hutton, S. (1992). The Conway Letters: the Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends, 1642–1684. Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Lauge Olaf (1988). ‘A Seventeenth Century Physician on God and Atoms: Sebastian Basso’, in Kretzmann, N. (ed.), Meaning and Inference in Medieval Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Niewöhner, Friedrich (1989). Veritas sive Varietas. Lessings Toleranzparabel und das Buch von den drei Betrügern. Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider.Google Scholar
Nizolio, Mario (1956). De Veris principiis et vera ratione philosophandi contra pseudophilosophos, ed. Breen, Quirinus. Rome: Fratelli Bocca. [First ed. 1553; ed. Leibniz, G. W., 1671]Google Scholar
Noonan, John T. Jr. (1957). The Scholastic Analysis of Usury. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin (1982). ‘Future Contingents’, in Kenny, Kretzmann, and Pinborg, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normore, Calvin (1986). ‘Objective Being: Descartes and His Sources’, in Rorty, 1986a.Google Scholar
Norris, John (1694). The Theory and Regulation of Love. A Moral Essay. London.Google Scholar
Norris, John (1701–4). An Essay towards the Theory of the Ideal or Intelligible World (2 vols.). London. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1978.)Google Scholar
Novotný, František (1977). The Posthumous Life of Plato. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. (1980). Late-Scholastic and Humanist Theories of the Proposition. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. (1983). Judgment and Propostion. From Descartes to Kant. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. (1986). ‘The Historical Background to Locke's Account of Particles (Essay, III, 7)’, Logique et Analyse. 29:.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. (1988). ‘Geulinex' Containment Theory of Logic’, Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeling Letterkunde. N.S., 51:.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. (1992). ‘A 17th-Century Debate on the Consequentia mirabilis’, History and Philosophy of Logic. 13:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutkiewicz, M. (1983). ‘Samuel Pufendorf: Obligation as the Basis of the State’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 21:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakeshott, M. (1975). Hobbes on Civil Association. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis (1961). ‘Christian Theology and the Newtonian Science: The Rise of the Concept of the Laws of Nature’, Church History. 30:. (Reprinted in Creation: The Impact of an Idea, ed. O'Connor, D. and Oakley, F. (1969). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.)Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis (1984). Omnipotence, Covenant and Order: An Excursion in the History of Ideas from Abelard to Leibniz. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko (1981). Forerunners of the Reformation. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Ockham, William [of] (1967). Philosophical Writings, ed. and trans. Boehner, P.. London and Edinburgh: Nelson.Google Scholar
Ockham, William [of] (1974–9). Opera philosophica, ed. Boehner, P., Gál, G., and Brown, S. (3 vols.). Saint Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
O'Daly, G. (1987). Augustine's Philosophy of Mind. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Odonis, Gerardus (1500). Sententia et expositio cum questionibus super libros Ethicorum Aristotelis.…Venice.Google Scholar
Oestreich, Gerhard (1982). Neostoicism and the Early Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Office of Population, Censuses and Surveys (Great Britain) (1982). Census 1981: Historical Tables, 1801–1981: England and Wales. London: HMSO.
Okruhlik, K. (1985). ‘The Status of Scientific Laws in the Leibnizian System’, in Okruhlik, K. and Brown, J. (eds.), The Natural Philosophy of Leibniz. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldenburg, Henry (1965–86). The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, ed. Hall, A. Rupert, Hall, Marie Boas (13 vols.). Vols. 1–9 Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; vols. 10–11 London: Mansell; vols. 12–13 London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Oldrini, Guido (1985). ‘Le particularità del ramismo inglese’, Rinascimento. 25:.Google Scholar
Oldrini, Guido (1987). ‘L'etica “ramista” di William Temple’, Rinascimento. 27:.Google Scholar
Olivecrona, Knut Hans Karl (1971). Law as Fact. 2d ed. London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
Olivecrona, Knut Hans Karl (1973). ‘Das Meinige nach der Naturrechtslehre’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie. 59:.Google Scholar
Olivecrona, Knut Hans Karl (1977). ‘Die zwei Schichten im naturrechtlichen Denken’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie. 63:.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Eileen (1987). ‘Mind–Body Interaction and Metaphysical Consistency: A Defense of Descartes’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 25:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Eileen (1993). ‘Influxus Physicus’, in Nadler, S., (ed.), Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. (1958). Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue: From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Orcibal, Jean (1959). La rencontre du Carmel thérésien avec les mystiques du Nord. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Orcibal, Jean (1965). Le cardinal de Bérulle, évolution d'une spiritualité. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Oresme, Nicole (1968). Le Livre du Ciel et du Monde, ed. and trans. Menut, Albert. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Orobio de Castro, Isaac (1770). Israel vengé, ou exposition naturelle des prophéties hébraiques que les chrétiens appliquent à Jésus, leur prétendu Messie. London.Google Scholar
Orr, R. R. (1967). Reason and Authority: The Thought of William Chillingworth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J. (1983). ‘Providence and Divine Will in Gassendi's Views on Scientific Knowledge’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 44:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, Margaret J. (1985a). ‘Baptizing Epicurean Atomism: Pierre Gassendi on the Immortality of the Soul’, in Osler, M. J. and Farber, P. L. (eds.), Religion, Science, and Worldview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J. (1985b). ‘Eternal Truths and the Laws of Nature: The Theological Foundations of Descartes' Philosophy of Nature’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 46:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, Margaret J. (1991). ‘Fortune, Fate and Divination: Gassendi's Voluntarist Theology and the Baptism of Epicurus’, in Osler, Margaret J. (ed.), Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquillity: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J. (1993). ‘Ancients, Moderns, and the History of Philosophy: Gassendi's Epicurean Project’, in Sorell, Tom (ed.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy: The Tension between the New and Traditional Philosophies from Machiavelli to Leibniz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret J. (1994). Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gassendi and Descartes on Contingency and Necessity in the Created World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterhorn, E.-D. (1962). Die Naturrechtslehre Valentin Albertis. diss., Albert-Ludwig-Universität, Freiburg i. B.Google Scholar
Othmer, Sieglinde C. (1970). Berlin und die Verbreitung des Naturrechts in Europa. Kultur- und Sozial-geschichtliche Studien zu Jean Barbeyracs Pufendorf-Übersetzungen und eine Analyse seiner Leserschaft. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overton, Richard (1644). Mans Mortallitie. Amsterdam. (Repr. English Reprints Series, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1968.)Google Scholar
OwensJoseph, C. SS. R. Joseph, C. SS. R. (1982). ‘Faith, Ideas, Illumination, and Experience’, in Kretzmann, Kenny, and Pinborg, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacchi, Arrigo (1965). ‘Ruggero Bacone e Roberto Grossatesta in un inedito Hobbesiano del 1634’, Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia. 20:.Google Scholar
Pacchi, Arrigo (1987). ‘Hobbes and the Passions’, Topoi. 6:.Google Scholar
Pace, Anna (1987). ‘Descartes critico di Descartes: il concetto di quiete nelle leggi del moto daIl Mondo ai Principi, in Miscellanea secentesca: saggi su Descartes, Fabri, White (Università degli Studi di Milano, Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia: Quaderni di Acme, 8). Milan: Cisalpino-Goliardica.Google Scholar
Pachder, G. M. (ed.) (1887–94). Ratio studiorum et Institutiones scholasticae Societatis Jesu, per Germaniam olim vigentes… (Monumenta Germaniae Paedagogica, Band V)(4 vols.). Berlin: A. Hoffmann & Comp.Google Scholar
Pacho, E. (1980). ‘Molinos’, in Viller, Marcel et al. (eds.) (1932–95), Dictionnaire de spiritualité ascétique et mystique (17 tomes in 21 vols.), t. 10, cols. 1486–1514. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Pagden, A. R. D. (1981). ‘The “School of Salamanca” and the Affair of the Indies’, History of Universities. 1:.Google Scholar
Pagden, A. R. D. (1982). The Fall of Natural Man: Tlie American Indian and the Origins of Comparative Ethnology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pagden, A. R. D. (1987). ‘Dispossessing the Barbarian: The Language of Spanish Thomism and the Debate over the Property Rights of the American Indians’, in Pagden, A. R. D. (ed.), The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagel, Walter (1982). Joan Baptista Van Helmont: Reformer of Science and Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pagel, Walter (1984). The Smiling Spleen: Paracetsianism in Storm and Stress. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Palladini, F. (1978). Discussioni seicentesche su Samuel Pufendorf. Scritti latini: 1663–1700 (Pubblicazioni del Centro di Studio per la Storia della Storiografia Filosophica 6). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Palladini, F. (1984). ‘Le due lettere di Pufendorf al Barone di Boineburg: Quella nota e quella “perduta”’, Nouvelles de la république des lettres (Naples). 1:.Google Scholar
Palladini, F. (1990). Pufendorf discepolo di Hobbes. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Palladini, F. forthcoming. ‘Is the “Socialitas” of Pufendorf Really Anti-Hobbesian?’ in Bödeker, H.-E. and Hont, I. (eds.), Unsocial Sociability. Natural Law and the Eighteenth-Century Discourse on Society. London: Routledge.
Pallavicino, Sforza (1644). Del bene libri quattro. Rome.Google Scholar
Pardies, Ignace-Gaston (1672). Discours de la connoissance des bestes. Paris. (Repr. New York: Johnson, 1972.)Google Scholar
Pardies, Ignace-Gaston (1691). Oeuvres de mathématiques. The Hague.Google Scholar
Pardies, Ignace-Gaston (1696). Oeuvres du R.P. Ignace-Gaston Pardies. LyonGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek (1985). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parinetto, Luciano (1974). Magia e ragione: Una polemica sulle streghe in Italia intorno al 1750. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Park, Katharine (1981). ‘Albert's Influence on Late Medieval Psychology’, in Weisheipl, J. A. (ed.), Albertus Magnus and the Sciences. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Park, Katherine (1988). ‘The Organic Soul’, in Schmitt, Skinner, and Kessler, 1988.Google Scholar
Park, Katherine, and Kessler, Eckhard (1988). ‘The Concept of Psychology’, in Schmitt, Skinner, and Kessler, 1988.Google Scholar
Parker, Samuel (1666a). An Account of the Nature and Extent of the Divine Dominion, Especially as They Refer to the Origenian Hypothesis concerning the Preexistence of Souls, Together with a Special Account of the Vanity and Groundlessness of the Hypothesis It Self. London.Google Scholar
Parker, Samuel (1666b). A Free and Impartial Censure of the Platonick Philosophie. Oxford. (Repr. New York: AMS Press.)Google Scholar
Parkinson, G. H. R. (1969). ‘Science and Metaphysics in the Leibniz-Newton Controversy’, in Akten des internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses, Hannover, 14–19 November 1966, Band II, Mathematik-Naturwissenschaften (Studia Leibnitiana Supplements 2). Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Parkinson, G. H. R. (1982). ‘The “Intellectualization of Appearances”: Aspects of Leibniz's Theory of Sensation and Thought’ in Hooker, Michael (ed.), Leibniz: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, G. H. R. (1993). ‘Spinoza: Metaphysics and Knowledge’, in Parkinson, G. H. R. (ed.), The Renaissance and Seventeenth-Century Rationalism, vol. 4 of Routledge History of Philosophy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parr, S. (ed.) (1837). Metaphysical Tracts by English Philosophers of the Eighteenth Century. London. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1974.)Google Scholar
Parrain, Jacques (1695). La Morale d'Epicure avec des réflexions. Paris.Google Scholar
Partington, J. R. (1961–70). A History of Chemistry (4 vols.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pascal, (1966). Pensées, trans. Krailsheimer, A. J.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise (1670). Pensées de M. Pascal sur la religion et sur quelques autres sujets, qui ont esté trouvées après sa mort parmi ses papiers. Paris.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise (1904–14). Oeuvres, ed. Brunschvicg, L. et al. (8 vols.). Paris: Hachette. (Repr. Valduz: Kraus, 1965.)Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise (1951). Pensées sur la Religion et sur quelques autres sujets, ed. Lafuma, L.. Paris: Editions du Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise (1962). Pensées, ed. Lafuma, Louis. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise (1963). Oeuvres complètes, ed. Lafuma, Louis. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise (1964). Lettres provinciales, ed. Rosset, Clémont. Paris: Pauvert.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise (1964–). Oeuvres complétes, ed. , Jean Mesnard (4 vols. to date). Paris: Desclée De Brouwer.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise (1967). Pensées et Opuscules, ed. Brunschvicg, Léon. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise (1992). Discours sur la religion et quelques autres sujets, ed. Martineau, E.. Paris: Fayard and A. Colin.Google Scholar
Passmore, John (1951). Ralph Cudworth: An Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Repr. Bristol: Thoemmes, 1990.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passmore, John (1953). ‘Descartes, the British Empiricists, and Formal Logic’, The Philosophical Review. 62:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passmore, John (1986). ‘Locke and the Ethics of Belief’, in Kenny, A. (ed.), Empiricism, Rationalism and Idealism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patrides, Constantinos Apostolos, ed. (1969). The Cambridge Platonists. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Patrizi, Francesco (1581). Discussiones Peripateticae. Basle.Google Scholar
Patrizi, Francesco (1591). Nova de Universis Philosophia. Ferrara (2d ed., Venice, 1593). (Repr. with trans. (Serbo-Croat, ), ed. Filipović, Vladimir and Krstić, Kruno, trans. Ladan, Tomislav and Hrkač, Serafin. Sveučilišna Naklada Liber: Zagreb, 1979.)Google Scholar
Paulinus, Laurentius (1616). ANTIPRAKTIKON … Scholae ethicae, seu animadversiones piae…. Rostock.Google Scholar
Paull, Cranston (1992). ‘Leibniz and the Miracle of Freedom’, Nous. 26:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavone, Francesco (1633). Summa ethicae…. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pearson, Egon, and Kendall, Maurice, eds. (1970). Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability. Darien, Conn.: Hafner.Google Scholar
Pearson, John (1659). An Exposition of the Creed. London.Google Scholar
Pearson, Karl (1925). ‘James Bernoulli's Theorem’, Biometrika. 17:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Karl (1978). The History of Statistics in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Pecham, John (1970). John Pecham and the Science of Optics, Perspectiva Communis, ed. Lindberg, D. C.. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Kirsti Møller (1980). ‘Techniques of the Calculus, 1630–1660’, in Grattan-Guinness, Ivor (ed.), From the Calculus to Set Theory, 1630–1910. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Peers, Edgar A.(1927–30). Studies of the Spanish Mystics (2 vols.). London: Shedlor.Google Scholar
Pegis, A. C. (1934). St. Thomas and the Problem of the Soul in the Thirteenth Century (St. Michael's Medieval Studies). Toronto: Saint Michael's College.Google Scholar
Pérez-Ramos, Antonio (1988). Francis Bacon's Idea of Science and the Maker's Knowledge Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perkins, William (1966). A Discourse of Conscience, in Merrill, Thomas F. (ed.), William Perkins 1558–1602. English Puritanist. Nieuwkoop: de Graaf.Google Scholar
Perrett, Roy W. (1987). Death and Immortality. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, of Spain (1972). Tractatus, ed. Rijk, L. M.. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Peters, F. E. (1967). Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon. New York and London: New York University Press and University of London Press.Google Scholar
Peters, Richard (1956). Hobbes. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Peters, Richard (1967). Hobbes. 2d ed. London: Peregrine.Google Scholar
Petersen, Peter (1921). Geschichte der aristotelischen Philosophie im protestantischen Deutschland. Leipzig: Meiner. (Repr. Stuttgart: Frommann, 1962.)Google Scholar
Petersson, Robert T. (1956). Sir Kenelm Digby: The Ornament of England, 1603–1665. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Petrarca, Francesco (1975). Opere Latins, ed. and trans. (Italian, ) Bufano, Antonietta et al. (2 vols.). Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese.Google Scholar
Petrik, James M. (1992). Descartes' Theory of the Will. Durango, Colo.: Hollowbrook.Google Scholar
Petty, William (1674). Discourse Made before the Royal Society, the 26 of November 1674. Concerning the Use of Duplicate Proportion in Sundry Important Particulars: Together with a New Hypothesis of Springing or Elastique Motions. London.Google Scholar
Petty, William (1690). Political Arilhmetick. London.Google Scholar
Peucer, Caspar (1584). Les devins, ou commentaire des principals series de devinations: distingué en quinze livres, esquels les ruses & impostures de Satan sont descouvertes, solidement refutees, & separees d'avec les sainctes propheties & d'avec les predictions naturalles. Escrit en Latin par M. Caspar Peucer, tresdocte philosophe, mathematicien & medecin de nostre temps: nouvellement tourné en françois par S.C.S. …Antwerp.Google Scholar
Phillips, Edward (1658). The New World of English Words. London. (Repr. Menston, Yorks: Scolar, 1969.)Google Scholar
Pico, della Mirandola, Gianfrancesco, (1972). Opera Omnia (Monumenta Politica Philosophica Humanisrica Rariora). Turin: Bottega d'Erasmo.Google Scholar
Pico, della Mirandola, Giovanni, (1942). De hominis dignilale; heptaplus; de ente et uno, ed. E. Garin, . Florence: Vallecchi Editore.Google Scholar
Pico, della Mirandola, Giovanni, (1965). On the Dignity of Man, On Being and the One, and Heptaplus. trans. Wallis, C. G., Miller, P. J. W., and Carmichael, D.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Pico, della Mirandola, Giovanni, (1971). Opera Omnia (2 vols.) (Monumenta Politica Philosophica Humanistica Rariora). Turin: Bottega d'Erasmo.Google Scholar
Pico, della Mirandola, Giovanni, (1973). Conclusiones sive Theses DCCCC Romae anno 1486 publice disputandae, sed non admissae, ed. Kieszkowski, Bohdan. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Pico, della Mirandola, Giovanni, (1993). Oeuvres philosophiques, ed. and trans. (Latin, with French, trans.) Boulnois, O. and Tognon, G.. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Pine, Martin (1986). Pietro Pomponazzi: Radical Philosopher of the Renaissance. Padua: Antenore.Google Scholar
Pinot, Virgile (1932). La Chine et la formation de I'esprit philosophique en France (1640–1740). Paris: Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
Pintard, René (1943). Le Libertinage érudit dans la première moitié du XVlle siècle. Paris: Boivin. (Repr. Geneva: Slatkine, 1983.)Google Scholar
Pithoys, Claude (1621). La descouverture des faux possedez. Chalons.Google Scholar
Placette, Jean La (1696). De insanabili romanae Ecclesiae scepticismo. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (ed.) (1968). The Ontological Argument. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Plethon, George Gemistus (1858). Traité des Lois, ed. Alexandre, C., trans. (French, ) A. Pellissier: Paris.Google Scholar
Plutarch, (1959). Plutarch's Lives, vol. I, ed. & trans. Perrin, B.. London: William Heinemann; Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plutarch, (1967). Non posse suaviter vivi secundum Epicurum and Adversus Colotem, trans. Einarson, Benedict and Lacy, Phillip H., in Plutarch's Moralia (17 vols., Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. London: Heinemann, vol. 14.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1972). ‘Time, History and Eschatology in the Thought of Thomas Hobbes’, in Politics, Language and Time. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Poiret, Pierre (1685). Cogitationum rationalium de Deo, anima, el malo. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Poiret, Pierre (1687). L'oeconomie divine, ou système universel et démontré des oeuvres et des desseins de Dieu envers les hommes. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Poiret, Pierre (1707). De Eruditione triplici, solida, superficiam el falsa. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Poiret, Pierre (1713). The Divine Oeconomy; or, An Universal System of the Works and Purposes of God towards Man, Demonstrated (6 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Poiret, Pierre. (1677). Cogitationum rationalium de Deo, anima et malo libri quattuor. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Poisson, Nicolas-Joseph. (1670). Commentaire ou remarques sur la methode de René Descartes où on établit plusieurs principes generaux, necessaires pour entendre toutes ses Oeuvres. Vendôme.Google Scholar
Polin, R. (1960). La polilique morale de john Locke. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Polin, R. (1981). Hobbes, Dieu, et les hommes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Pomponazzi, Pietro (1516). Tractatus de immortalitate animae. Bologna.Google Scholar
Pomponazzi, Pietro (1567). De naturalium effectuum causis sive de Incanlationibus. Basel. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1970.)Google Scholar
Pomponazzi, Pietro (1938). Tractatus de Immortalitate Animae, trans. Hay, William Henry II, followed by a facsimile of the editio princeps. Haverford: Haverford College.Google Scholar
Pomponazzi, Pietro (1948). ‘On the Immortality of the Soul’, trans. Hay, W. H. II, rev. Randall, J. H. Jr., in Cassirer, E., Kristeller, P. O., and Randall, J. H. Jr. (eds.), Renaissance Philosophy of Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pomponazzi, Pietro (1957). Libri quinque De Fato, De Libero Arbitrio, et De Praedestinatione. ed. Lemay, Richard. Lugano: Thesaurus Mundi.Google Scholar
Pomponazzi, Pietro (1966). Super Libello De Substantia Orbis et Quaestiones Quattuor, ed. Poppi, Antonino (Corsi Inediti dell' Insegnamento Padovano). Padua: Editrice Antenore.Google Scholar
Pona, Francesco (1627). Discorsi sopra le Morali di Aristotele à Nicomaco…. Venice.Google Scholar
Poncius, Johannes (1649). Integer philosophiae cursus ad mentem Scoti. Paris, (1st ed. 1643.)Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1959a). ‘Pierre Bayle's Place in 17th Century Scepticism’, in Dibon, P. (ed.), Pierre Bayle: Le Philosophe de Rotterdam. Amsterdam: Elzevier.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1959b). ‘Did Hume Ever Read Berkeley?Journal of Philosophy. 56:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1960). ‘Skepticism and the Counter-Reformation in France’, Archiv für Reformations-geschichte. 51:.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1963). ‘Scepticism in the Enlightenment’, Studies in Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century. 26:.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1964). The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Descartes. Rev. ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1971). ‘The Philosophy of Bishop Stillingfleet’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 9:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1972). ‘Kierkegaard and Scepticism’, in Thompson, Josiah (ed.), Kierkegaard: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1974). ‘Menasseh ben Israel and Isaac La Peyrère’, Studio Rosenthaliana. 8:5.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1976). ‘The Pre-Adamite Theory in the Renaissance’, in Mahoney, Edward P. (ed.), Philosophy and Humanism: Renaissance Essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1978). ‘Pre-Adamism in 19th Century American Thought: Speculative Biology and Racism’, Phihsophia. 8:.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1979). The History of Skepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza, 4th ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1980a). ‘David Hume and the Pyrrhonian Controversy’, in Popkin, R. H. (ed.), The High Road to Pyrrhonism. San Diego: Austin Hill.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1980b). ‘The Philosophical Basis of Modern Racism’, in Popkin, R. H. (ed.), The Highroad to Pyrrhonism, San Diego: Austin Hill.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1980c). ‘Jewish Messianism and Christian Millenarianism’, in Zagorin, Perez (ed.), Culture and Politics from Puritanism to the Enlightenment. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard [H.] (1980d). The High Road to Pyrrhonism, ed. Watson, R. A. and Force, J. E.. San Diego: Austin Hill Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1983). ‘The Third Force in Seventeenth Century Philosophy: Scepticism, Biblical Prophecy and Science’, Nouvelles de la Republique des Lettres. 3:.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1984a). ‘The First College of Jewish Studies’, Revue des études juives. 143:.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1984b). ‘Menasseh ben Israel and Isaac La Peyrère Il’, Studio Rosenthaliana. 18:.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1984c). ‘Nathan Shapira's Visit to Amsterdam in 1657’, in Michman, Joseph (ed.), Dutch Jewish History. Jerusalem: Hebrew University.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1984d). ‘Spinoza's Relations with the Quakers in Amsterdam’, Quaker History. 70:.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1985a). ‘Un autre Spinoza’, Archives de Philosophie. 48:.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1985b). ‘Samuel Fisher and Spinoza’, Philosophia. 15:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1986a). ‘The Third Force in Seventeenth-Century Thought: Skepticism, Science and Millenarianism’, in Ullmann-Margalit, E. (ed.), The Prism of Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1986b), ‘The Lost Tribes, the Caraites and the English Millenarians’, Journal of Jewish Studies. 37:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1986c). ‘Could Spinoza Have Known Bodin's Colloquium Heptaplomeres?Philosophia. 16:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1987a). ‘A Note on Moses Wall’, in Israel, Menasseh, The Hope of Israel, ed. Méchoulan, and Nahon, . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1987b). Isaac La Peyrère: His Life, Work and Influence. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1987c). ‘Jacques Basnage's Histoire des Juifs and the Biblioteca Sarraziana’, Studia Rosenthaliana. 21:.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1987d). ‘A Late 17th Century Attempt to Convert the Jews to Reformed Judaism’, in Almog, Shmuel et al. (eds.), Israel and the Nations: Essays Presented in Honor of Shmuel Ettinger. Jerusalem: History Society of Israel.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1987e). ‘Introduction’ to Popkin, R. H. and Signer, M. J. (eds.), Spinoza's Earliest Publication?Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1987f). ‘The Religious Background of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 25:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1988a). ‘Introduction’ to Pascal, Selections. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1988b). ‘Some Aspects of Jewish-Christian Theological Interchanges in Holland and England 1640–1700’, in Berg, J. and Wall, Ernestine G. E. (eds.), Jewish-Christian Relations in the Seventeenth Century. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1988c). ‘Newton's Biblical Theology and his Theological Physics’, in Scheurer, P. B. and Debrock, G. (eds.), Newton's Scientific and Philosophical Legacy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1988d). ‘The Dispersion of Bodin's Dialogues in England, Holland and Germany’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 49:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1988e). ‘Theories of Knowledge’, in Skinner, Schmitt, and Kessler, 1988.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1989a). The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1989b). ‘The Rise and Fall of the Jewish Indian Theory’, in Kaplan, Y., Méchoulan, H., and Popkin, R., (eds.), Menasseh ben Israel and His World. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1989c). ‘A Jewish Merchant of Venice’, Shakespeare Quarterly. 40:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1989d). ‘Spinoza's Earliest Philosophical Years’, Studia Spinoziana. 4:.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1989e). ‘Two Unused Sources about Sabbatai Zevi’, in Michman, J. (ed.), Dutch Jewish History. Jerusalem: Hebrew University.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1990a). ‘Spinoza and the Three Impostors’, in Curley, and Moreau, 1990.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1990b). ‘The Crisis of Polytheism and the Answers of Vossius, Cudworth and Newton’, in Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (eds.), Essays on the Context, Nature, and Influence of Isaac Newton's Theology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1990c). ‘Polytheism, Deism, and Newton’, in Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (eds.), Essays on the Context, Nature, and Influence of Isaac Newton's Theology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1990d). The Third Force in 17th Century Philosophy. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1990e). ‘Newton and Maimonides II.’, Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (eds.), Essays on the Context, Nature, and Influence of Isaac Newton's Theology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1990f). ‘Newton as a Bible Scholar’, in Force, J. E. and Popkin, R. H. (eds.), Essays on the Context, Nature, and Influence of Isaac Newton's Theology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1990g). ‘The Role of Jewish anti-Christian Arguments in the Rise of Scepticism’, in Henry, John and Hutton, Sarah (eds.), New Perspectives on Renaissance Thought. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1992a). ‘Jewish Anti-Christian Arguments as a Source of Irreligion from the Seventeenth to the Early Nineteenth Century’, in Hunter, Michael and Wootton, David (eds.), Atheism from the Reformation to the Enlightenment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1992b). ‘Spinoza, Neo-Platonic Kabbalist?’, in Goodman, Lenn E. (ed.), Neoplatonism and Jewish Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (1992c). ‘Fideism, Quietism and Unbelief: Scepticism for and against Religion in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries’, in Hester, Marcus (ed.), Faith, Reason, and Skepticism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press and.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. (forthcoming) ‘Queen Christina and Isaac La Peyrère’, to be published in a collection by the French Embassy in Stockholm.
Popkin, Richard H., and Gordon, Weiner (eds.) (1994). Jewish Christians and Christian Jews in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl (1982). Unended Quest: An Intellectural Autobiography. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
Poppi, Antonino (1972). La dottrina della scienza in Giacomo Zabarella. Padua: Antenore.Google Scholar
Poser, H. (1969). Zur Theorie der Modalbegriffe bei C. W. Leibniz (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Postel, Guillaume (1543). Sacrarum apodixeon, seu Euclidis christiani libri II. Paris.Google Scholar
Postel, Guillaume (1969). Le thrésor des prophetiés de l'univers, ed. Secret, F.. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Postel, Guillaume (1971). Le candelabre de Moses, ed. Secret, F.. Nieuwkoop: B. de Graaf.Google Scholar
Poulain de la Barre, François (1673). De l'égalité des deux sexes. Paris.Google Scholar
Pousseur, Jean-Marie (1984). ‘La distinction de la ratio et de la methodus dans le Novum organum et ses prolongements dans le rationalisme cartésien’, in Fattori, Marta (ed.), Francis Bacon: Terminologia e fortuna nel XVII secolo (Seminario internazionale, Roma 11–13 marzo 1984). Rome: Edizione dell'Ateneo.Google Scholar
Pousseur, Jean-Marie (1985). ‘Méthode et dialectique’, in Malherbe, Michel and Pousseur, Jean-Marie (eds.), Francis Bacon: Science et méthode, Actes du Colloque de Nantes. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Pousseur, Jean-Marie (1988). Bacon 1561–1626: Inventer la science. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
Powell, E. E. (1899). Spinozas Gottesbegriff. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Powicke, F. J. (1926). The Cambridge Platonists. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Pozzi, L. (1981). Da Ramus a Kant. Il dibattito sulla sillogistica. Con appendice su Lewis Carroll (Pubblicazioni dell' Istituto di Filosofia dell' Università di Parma, Studi). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Prendergast, Thomas L. (1972–3). ‘Descartes and the Relativity of Motion’, Modern Schoolman. 50:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prendergast, Thomas L. (1975). ‘Motion, Action, and Tendency in Descartes' Physics’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 13:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, A. N. (1967). ‘Logic, Traditional’, in Edwards, P. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (8 vols.). London: Collier-Macmillan, vol. 5.Google Scholar
Prost, J. (1907). Essai sur l'atomisme et l'occasionalisme dans la philosophie cartésienne. Paris: Paulin.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius, (1608). Les oeuvres du divin Denys l'Aréopagite. Paris.Google Scholar
Ptolemy, Claudius (1989). L'Optique de Claude Ptolémée dans la version latine d'après l'arabe de l'émir Eugène de Sicile, ed. and trans. Lejeune, A.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1672). De jure naturae et gentium. Lund.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1673). De officio hominis et civis juxta legam naturalem. Lund.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1686). Eris Scandia, quae adversus libros de jurae naturae et gentium objecta diluuntur. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1706a). Les devoirs de l'homme et du citoyen, tels qu'ils lui sont prescrits par la loi naturelle, trans. Barbeyrac, J.. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1706b). Eris Scandica. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1707). Le droit de la nature et des gens, ou système général des principes les plus importants de la morale, de la jurisprudence, et de la politique, trans Barbeyrac, J. (2 vols.). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1717). Of the Law of Nature and Nations, trans. Kennet, Basil. 3d ed. London.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1749). The Law of Nature and Nations, ed. Barbeyrac, J., trans. Kennet, B.. London.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1893). ‘Briefe von Pufendorf’, ed. Varrentrapp, K., Historische Zeitschrift. 70:.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1894). ‘Briefe Pufendorf's an Falaiseau, Friese und Weigel’, ed. Varrentrapp, K., Historische Zeitschrift. 73:.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1897). Briefe Samuel Pufendorfs an Christian Thomasius (1687–1693), ed. Gigas, E. (Historische Bibliothek, 2). Munich and Leipzig: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1927). De officio hominis et civis juxta legem naturalem libri duo, bilingual ed. trans. Moore, E. G. (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1931). Elementorum jurisprudentiae universalis libri duo, bilingual ed. trans. Oldfather, W. A. (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1967). De iure naturae et gentium libri octo, ed. Hertius, J. N., Barbeyrac, J., and Mascovius, G. (2 vols.). Frankfurt: Minerva.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1990). On the Natural State of Men [1678], trans. and ed. Seidler, M.. Lewiston, N.Y.: Queenston, Ontario; and Lampeter, England: Edward Melden Press.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1991). On the Duty of Man and Citizen according to Natural Law, trans. Silverthorne, M., ed. Tully, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Purchotius, Edmundus (1751). Institutiones philosophicae. Padua.Google Scholar
Quevedo, Francisco (1945–60). Obras completas, ed. Marin, L. Astrana (2 vols.). Madrid: M. Aguilar.Google Scholar
Quevedo, Francisco (1986). Defensa de Epicuro contra la común opinión, ed. Méndez, E. Acosta. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.Google Scholar
Rabbe, F. (1867). Etude philosophique sur l'Abbé Simon Foucher. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Rabe, H. (1958). Naturrecht und Kirche bei Samuel von Pufendorf. Tübingen: Fabianverlag.Google Scholar
Rabinovitch, Nachum L. (1973). Probability and Statistical Inference in Ancient and Medieval Jewish Literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Rademaker, C. S. M. (1981). Life and Works of Gerardus Joannnes Vossius, (1577–1649). Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Radner, Daisie (1978). Malebranche: A Study of a Cartesian System. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Raey, Johannes (1651–52). Disputationes physicae ad problemata Aristotelis. Leiden.Google Scholar
Raey, Johannes (1654). Clavis philosophiae naturalis, seu introductio ad contemplationem naturae Aristotelico-Cartesiana. Leiden.Google Scholar
Raey, Johannes (1677). Clavis philosophiae naturalis aristotelico-cartesiana. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ramsay, Andrew Michael (1727). Les voyages de Cyrus. Paris.Google Scholar
Ramus, Peter (1569). Scholae in Liberales Artes. Basel. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1970.)Google Scholar
Randall, John Herman Jr. (1940). ‘The Development of Scientific Method in the School of Padua’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 1:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, John Herman Jr. (1961). The School of Padua and the Emergence of Modern Science. Padua: Editrice Antenore.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. (1962). ‘Obligations and rights in Hobbes’, Philosophy. 37(1962):.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raphael, D. D. (1977). Hobbes. Morals and Politics. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Rashdall, Hastings (1936). The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages, ed. Powicke, F. M. and Emden, A. B.. 2d ed. (3 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rashed, Roshdi (1984). Entre arithmétique et algèbre: Recherches sur l'histoire des mathématiques arabes. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Rathery, E.-J.-P., and Boutron, (1873). Mademoiselle de Scudéry: Sa vie et sa correspondence avec un choix de ses poésies. Paris: Techener.Google Scholar
Rattansi, P. M. (1963). ‘Paracelsus and the Puritan Revolution’, Ambix. 11:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattansi, P. M. (1972). ‘Newton's Alchemical Studies’, in Debus 1972, vol. I.Google Scholar
Raymond, Pierre (1975). De la combinatoire aux probabilités. Paris: François Massero.Google Scholar
Real, Hermann Josef (1970). Untersuchungen zur Lukrez-Übersetzung von Thomas Creech. Bad Homburg v.d.H.: Gehlen.Google Scholar
Redwood, John (1976). Reason, Ridicule and Religion: The Age of Enlightenment in England, 1660–1750. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reeb, Georg S.J. (1636). Axiomata philosophica frequentius iactari solita in Dilingana Academia anno M.DC.XXV. explicata …. Duaci.Google Scholar
Rees, Graham (1975). ‘Francis Bacon's Semi-Paracelsian Cosmology’, Ambix. 22:.Google Scholar
Rees, Graham (1977a). ‘The Fate of Bacon's Cosmology in the Seventeenth Century’, Ambix. 24:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, Graham (1977b). ‘Matter Theory: A Unifying Factor in Bacon's Natural Philosophy?Ambix. 24:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, Graham (1980). ‘Atomism and “Subtlety” in Francis Bacon's Philosophy’, Annals of Science. 37:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, Graham (1984a). ‘Bacon's Philosophy: Some New Sources with Special Reference to the Abecedarium novum naturae’, in Fattori, Marta (ed.), Francis Bacon: Terminologia e fortuna nel XVII secolo (Seminario internazionale, Roma 11–13 marzo 1984). Rome: Edizione dell'Ateneo.Google Scholar
Rees, Graham (1984b). ‘Francis Bacon's Biological Ideas: A New Manuscript Source’, in Vickers, Brian (ed.), Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reesink, Henrika Johanna (1931). L'Angleterre et la littérature anglaise dans les trois plus anciens périodiques francais de Hollande de 1684 à 1709. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Reeves, Marjorie (1969). The Influence of Prophecy in the Late Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Régis, Pierre-Sylvain (1690). Système de philosophie contenant la logique, la métaphysique, la physique et la morale (3 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Régis, Pierre-Sylvain (1691a). Cours entier de philosophie, ou système général selon les principes de M. Descartes (3 vols.). Amsterdam. (Repr. New York: Johnson Reprint, 1970.)Google Scholar
Régis, Pierre-Sylvain (1691b). Système de philosophie …. (7 vols.). Lyon.Google Scholar
Régis, Pierre-Sylvain (1692). Réponse aux Reflexions critiques de M. Du Hamel. Paris.Google Scholar
Régis, Pierre-Sylvain (1704). L'usage de la raison et de la foi, ou l'accord de la foi et la raison. Paris.Google Scholar
Regius, Henricus (1646). Fundamenta Physices. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Regius, Henricus (1647). Explicatio mentis humana. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Regius, Henricus (1648). Brevis explicatio mentis humana sive animae rationalis. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Regius, Henricus (1650). De affectibus animi dissertatio. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Regius, Henricus (1654). Philosophia naturalis. Editio secunda, priore multo locupletior et emendatior. Amsterdam. (2d ed. of Regius 1646.)Google Scholar
Regius, Henricus (1661). Philosophia Naturalis. (Revision of 1654 ed., Amsterdam.)Google Scholar
Regnerus, Cyprianus (1986). Demonstratio logicae verae iuridica, ed. Kalinowski, G. (Instruments rationis. Sources for the history of modern logic). Bologna: Editrice CLUEB.Google Scholar
Reibstein, E. (1953–4). ‘Deutsche Grotius-Kommentatoren bis zu Christian Wolff’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht. 15:.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas (1969). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas (1975). Inquiry and Essays. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Reif, P. (1969). ‘The Textbook Tradition in Natural Philosophy, 1600–1650’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 30:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, J. (1972). System und Praxis. Zur kritische Analyse der Denkformen neuzeitlicher Metaphysik im Werk von Malebranche. Freiburg-Munich: Alber.Google Scholar
Remec, Peter Paul (1960). The Position of the Individual in International Law according to Grotius and Vattel. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remnant, Peter (1979). ‘Descartes: Body and Soul’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 9:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1966). Galen and the Syllogism. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1967). The Philosophy of Leibniz. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1979). Leibniz: An Introduction to His Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1981). ‘Leibniz on Intermonadic Relations’, in Truth, Knowledge and Reality. Inquiries into the Foundations of Seventeenth Century Rationalism, ed. , George Henry R. Parkinson (Studia Leibnitiana, Sonderheft). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Returns from Universities and University Colleges in Receipt of Treasury Grant 1922–23 (1924). London: HMSO.
Reventlow, H. Graf (1984). The Authority of the Bible and the Rise of the Modern World. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Revius, J. (1643). Suarez Repurgatus. Leiden.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Edward (1658). A Treatise of the Passions and Faculties of the Soule of Man…. London.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Rebecca L. (1993). ‘Samuel Cocceji and the Tradition of Natural Jurisprudence’, M. Phil. diss., University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rheinfelder, Hans (1928). Das Wort ‘Persona’. Geschichte seiner Bedeutungen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Französischen und Italienischen Mittelalters (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, Heft 77). Halle: Max Niemeier.Google Scholar
Rhigini Bonelli, M. L., and Shea, William R. (eds.) (1975). Reason, Experiment and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution. New York: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Ricci, Matteo, and Trigault, Nicolas (1615). De Christiana expeditione apud Sinas. Augsburg.Google Scholar
Ricci, Matteo, and Trigault, Nicolas (1953). China in the Sixteenth Century: The Journals of Matthew Ricci 1583–1610, trans. Gallagher, Louis J. S.J.New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Rice, James V. (1939). Gabriel Naudé, 1600–1653 (Johns Hopkins Studies in Romance Literatures and Languages, 35). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, Lee C. (1975). ‘Spinoza on Individuation’, in Mandelbaum, M. and Freeman, E. (eds.), Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Richardson, Linda Deer (1985). ‘The Generation of Disease: Occult Causes and Diseases of the Total Substance’, in Wear, A., French, R. K., and Lonie, I. M. (eds.), The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Robert (1982). ‘The “Scandal” of Cartesian Interaction’, Mind. 92:.Google Scholar
Riley, Patrick (1986). The General Will before Rousseau. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Wilhelm (1964–70). Die Logik der Neuzeit (2 vols.). Stuttgart: Frommann.Google Scholar
Risse, Wilhelm (1965). Bibliographia logica. Verzeichnis der Druckschriften zur Logik mit Angabe ihrer Fundorte (Studien und Materialien zur Geschichte der Philosophie). Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Risse, Wilhelm, (1983). ‘Zaberellas Methodenlehre’, in Olivieri, Luigi (ed.), Aristotelismo veneto e scienza moderna (2 vols.). Padua: Editrice Antenore.Google Scholar
Ritter, Joachim (ed.) (1971). Historisches Worterbuch der Philosophie (2 vols.). Basel-Stuttgart: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Roberval, Gilles Personne (1644). Aristarchi Samii de mundi systemate partibus et motibus eiusdem libellus. Paris.Google Scholar
Roberval, Gilles Personne (1693). Traité des indivisibles, in Divers ouvrages de mathematique et de physique. Par Messieurs de l'Academie Royale des Sciences. Paris. (Reprinted in Divers ouvrages de M. de Roberva = Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences depuis 1666 à 1699, vol. 6, Paris, 1730).Google Scholar
Robinet, André (1955). Malebranche et Leibniz: Relations personnelles. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Robinet, André (1965). Système et Existence dans l'oeuvre de Malebranche. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Robinet, André (1980). ‘Suarez dans l'oeuvre de Leibniz’, Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofia (Salamanca). 8:.Google Scholar
Robinet, André (1981). ‘Suarez im Werk von Leibniz’, Studia Leibnitiana. 13:.Google Scholar
Robinet, André (1983). ‘Leibniz: Lecteur du Treatise de Berkeley’, Les études philosophiques. 2/1983:.Google Scholar
Robinet, André (1986). Architectonique disjonctive, automates systémiques et idéalité transcendentale dans l'oeuvre de G. W. Leibniz. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Robinson, Lewis (1913). ‘Un solipsiste au XVIIIe siècle’, Année philosophique. 24:.Google Scholar
Robles, Laureano (1979). El estudio de la “Etica” en España (del siglo XIII al XX). Salamanca: Calatrava.Google Scholar
Rochemonteix, C. (1889). Un collège des jésuites aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles: Le Collège Henri IV de la Flèche (4 vols). Le Mans: Leguicheux.Google Scholar
Rochot, Bernard (1944). Les travaux de Gassendi sur Epicure et sur l'atomisme. 1619–1658. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Rochot, Bernard (1952). ‘Beeckman, Gassendi et le principe d'inertie’, Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences, 20–1:.Google Scholar
Röd, Wolfgang (1969). ‘Weigels Lehre von den entia moralia’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 51:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Röd, Wolfgang (1970). Geometrischer Geist und Naturrecht. Methodengeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur Staatsphilosophie im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, G[eneviève], (1980). ‘Quelques compléments sur la création des vérités éternelles’, in Etienne Gilson et nous: La philosophie et son histoire. Paris: Vrin. (Repr. in Rodis-Lewis, 1985.)Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève (1957). La Morale de Descartes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève (1963). Nicolas Malebranche. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève (1971). L'oeuvre de Descartes (2 vols.). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève (1979). ‘Quelques échos de la thèse de Desgabets sur l'indéfectibilité des substances’, Studia Cartesiana. 1:.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève (1981). ‘Polémiques sur la création des possibles et sur l'impossible sans l'école cartésienne’, Studia Cartesiana. 2:. (Repr. in Rodis-Lewis, 1985.)Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève (1985). Idées et vérités éternelles chez Descartes et ses successeurs. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève (1986). ‘L'interprétation malebranchiste d'Exode 3, 14. L'être infini et universel’, in Brown, E. Z. (ed.), Celui qui est – Interprétations juives et chrétiennes d'Exode 3, 14. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève (ed.) (1987a). Méthode et métaphysique chez Descartes, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève (1987b). ‘Le dernier fruit de la métaphysique cartésienne: La générosité’, Les études philosophiques. 1/1987:.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève (1990). ‘Augustinisme et Cartésianisme’, in Rodis-Lewis, G., L'anthropologie cartésienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-San, Pedro Bezares, Enrique, Luis (1986). La Universidad Salamantina del barroco periodo 1598–1625 (3 vols.) (Acta Salmaticensia, Historia de la Universidad 45). Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamonca.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. A. J. (1972). ‘Descartes and the Method of English Science’, Annals of Science. 29:.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, G. A. J. (1978). ‘Locke's Essay and Newton's Principia’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 39:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, G. A. J. (1988). ‘Hobbes's Hidden Influences’, in Rogers, and Ryan, 1988.
Rogers, G. A. J. (1990). ‘Locke's Essay and Newton's Principia’, in Yolton, John (ed.), Philosophy, Religion and Science in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Library of the History of Ideas). Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. A. J., and Ryan, A. (eds.) (1988). Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rohan, Henri, Due, (1638). De l'interest des princes et des Estats de la Chrestienté. Paris.Google Scholar
Rohault, Jacques (1671a). Traité de physique. Paris.Google Scholar
Rohault, Jacques (1671b). Entretiens sur la philosophie. Paris.Google Scholar
Rohault, Jacques (1682). Oeuvres posthumes de Mr. Rohault, ed. Clerselier, C.. Paris.Google Scholar
Rohault, Jacques (1723). A System of Natural Philosophy, Illustrated with Dr. Samuel Clarkes Notes … Done into English by John Clarke (2 vols.). London. (Repr. New York: Johnson Reprint, 1969.)Google Scholar
Rohault, Jacques (1978). Jacques Rohault: 1618–1672: bio-bibliographie, avec l'édition critique des Entretiens sur la philosophie, ed. Clair, Pierre. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Röhr, Julius (1923). Der okkulte Kraftbegriff im Altertum (Philologus, Supplementband 17.1). Leipzig: Dieterich.Google Scholar
Rolf, B. (1983). ‘The Port-Royal Theory of Definition’, Studia Leibnitiana. 15:.Google Scholar
Rome, Beatrice K. (1963). The Philosophy of Malebranche. Chicago: Regnery.Google Scholar
Rorty, Amélie O. (ed.) (1986a). Essays on Descartes' Meditations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Amélie O. (1986b). ‘The Structure of DescartesMeditations', in Rorty, 1986a.Google Scholar
Rorty, Amélie O. (1986c). ‘Cartesian Passions and the Union of Mind and Body’, in Rorty, 1986a.Google Scholar
Rorty, Amélie O. (1992). ‘Descartes on Thinking with the Body’, in Cottingham, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1978). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Paul Lawrence, and Stillman, Drake (1971). ‘The Pseudo-Aristotelian Questions of Mechanics in Renaissance Culture’, Studies in the Renaissance. 18:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfield, Leonora Cohen (1957). ‘Peripatetic Adversaries of Cartesianism in 17th Century France’, Review of Religion. 22:.Google Scholar
Rosenfield, Leonora Cohen (1968). From Beast-Machine to Man-Machine: Animal Soul in French Letters from Descartes to La Mettrie. 2d ed. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
Ross, Alexander (1645). Medicus Medicatus: Or the Physicians Religion Cured, by a Lenitive or Gentle Potion: With Some Animadversions upon Sir Kenelme Digbie's Observations on Religio Medici. London.Google Scholar
Ross, G. MacDonald (1973). ‘Rosicrucianism and the English Connection: On “The Rosicrucian Enlightenment” by Frances Yates’, Studia Leibnitiana. 5:.Google Scholar
Ross, G. MacDonald (1974). ‘Leibniz and the Nuremberg Alchemical Society’, Studia Leibnitiana. 6:.Google Scholar
Ross, G. MacDonald (1978). ‘Leibniz and Alchemy’, in Magia Naturalis 1978.Google Scholar
Ross, G. MacDonald (1982). ‘Alchemy and the Development of Leibniz's Metaphysics’, Theoria cum Praxi. Akten des III. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses, Hannover, 12–17.11.1977, bd. IV (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa 22).Google Scholar
Ross, G. MacDonald (1983). ‘Leibniz and Renaissance Neoplatonism’, in Heinekamp, Albert (ed.), Leibniz et la Renaissance (Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa, 23). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Ross, G. MacDonald (1984a). Leibniz (Past Masters). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, G. MacDonald (1984b). ‘Leibniz's Phenomenalism and the Construction of Matter’, in Heinekamp, A. (ed.), Leibniz' Dynamica (Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft, 13). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Ross, G. MacDonald (1985). ‘Occultism and Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century’, in Holland, A. J. (ed.), Philosophy, Its History and Historiography. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Ross, Stephanie (1984). ‘Painting the Passions: Charles le Brun's Conference sur l'Expression’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 45:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Paolo (1960). Clavis universalis: Arti mnemoniche e logica combinatoria da Lullo a Leibniz. Milan: Riccardo Ricciardi.Google Scholar
Rossi, Paolo (1968). Francis Bacon: From Magic to Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rossi, Paolo (1975). ‘Hermeticism, Rationality and the Scientific Revolution’, in Bonelli, M. L. Rhigini and Shea, William R. (eds.) Reason, Experiment and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution. New York: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Rossi, Paolo (1982). ‘The Aristotelians and the Moderns: Hypothesis and Nature’, Annali dell'Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza di Firenze. 7(fasc. 1):.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Paolo (1984). The Dark Abyss of Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, R. (1987). ‘La critica di Locke alla logica Aristotelica’, Rivista Rosminiana di Filosofia e di Cultura. 81:.Google Scholar
Røstvig, Maren-Sofie (1962–71). The Happy Man: Studies in the Metamorphoses of a Classical Ideal (2 vols., Oslo Studies in English), 2d ed. Oslo: Norwegian Universities Press.Google Scholar
Roth, Cecil (1945). A Life of Menasseh ben Israel. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar
Roth, Leon (1954). Spinoza. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Rovane, Carol (1993). ‘Self-Reference: the Radicalization of Locke’, Journal of Philosophy. 90:.Google Scholar
Rozemond, Marleen (1993). ‘The Role of the Intellect in Descartes's Case for the Incorporeity of the Mind’, in Voss, 1993.Google Scholar
Rubius, Antonius (1620). Commentarium in libros Aristotelis De anima. Lyon.Google Scholar
Rubius, Antonius (1641). In universam Aristotelis Dialecticam. London.Google Scholar
Ruby, Jane E. (1986). ‘The Origins of Scientific “Law”’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 47:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruestow, Edward G. (1973). Physics at Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century Leiden: Philosophy and the New Science in the University (International Archives of the History of Ideas, 11). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Rüping, H. (1968). Die Naturrechtslehre des Christian Thomasius und ihre Fortbildung in der Thomasius-Schule (Bonner rechtswissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, 81). Bonn: L. Röhrscheid.Google Scholar
Rüping, H. (1970). ‘Gottlieb Gerhard Titius und die Naturrechtslehre in Deutschland um die Wende vorn 17. zum 18. Jahrhundert’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Ger. Abt. 87:.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1937). A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz, 2d ed. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald (1993). ‘Natures, Laws, and Miracles: The Roots of Leibniz's Critique of Occasionalism’, in Nadler, S. (ed.), Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Donald (1995). Leibniz and the Rational Order of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Donald (forthcoming). ‘Leibniz and the Problem of Monadic Aggregation’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.
Sablé, Madeleine de Souvré, , Marquise (1865). Les Amis de la Marquise de Sablé: Recueil de Lettres des principaux habitués de son salon, ed. Barthélemy, E.. Paris: Dentu.Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I. (1981). Theories of Light from Descartes to Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1st ed., London: Oldbourne, 1967.)Google Scholar
Saccherius, Hieronymus (1697). Logica demonstrativa. Turin.Google Scholar
Sáenz de Aguirre, José (1677). De virtutibus et vitiis disputationes ethicae. …Salamanca.Google Scholar
Sáenz de Aguirre, José (1698). Philosophia moralis, ab Aristotele tradita decem libris Ethicorum ad Nicomachum… (2 vols.). Rome.Google Scholar
Sailor, Danton B. (1964). ‘Moses and atomism’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 25:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Evremond, Charles Marguetel de Saint Denis seigneur (1930). The Letters, ed. Hayward, John. London: Roudedge.Google Scholar
Sainte-Beuve, C. A. (1928). Port-Royal (7 vols.). Paris: La Connaissance.Google Scholar
Sakellariadis, Spyros (1982). ‘Descartes's Use of Empirical Data to Test Hypotheses’, Isis. 73:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, J. H. M. (1989). ‘Stoicism and Roman Example: Seneca and Tacitus in Jacobean England’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 50:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sams, H. W. (1944). ‘Anti-Stoicism in Seventeenth- and Early Eighteenth-Century England’, Studies in Philology. 41:.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Francisco (1581). Quod nihil scitur. Lyon.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Francisco (1618). Quod nihil scitur. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Francisco (1988). That Nothing Is Known; Quod nihil scitur, trans. Thomson, D. F. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Francisco. (1984). Quod Nihil Scitur, ed. Comparot, A.. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Robertus (1985). Logicae artis compendium, ed. Ashworth, E. J. (Instrumenta rationis. Sources for the history of modern logic). Bologna: Editrice CLUEB.Google Scholar
Sandys, J. E. (1906–8). A History of Classical Scholarship (3 vols.). 2d ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santillana, G. (1955). The Crime of Galileo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Santinello, Giovanni (ed.) (1981). Storia delle Storie Generali della Filosofia (3 vols.). Brescia: La Scuola.Google Scholar
Saraiva, A. J. (1972). ‘Antonia Vieira, Menasseh ben Israel et le Cinquième Empire’, Studia Rosenthaliana. 6:.Google Scholar
Sarasohn, L. T. (1982). ‘The Ethical and Political Philosophy of Pierre Gassendi’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 20:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarasohn, L. T. (1985). ‘Motion and Morality: Pierre Gassendi, Thomas Hobbes and the Mechanical World-View’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 46:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarasohn, L. T. (1991). ‘Epicureanism and the Creation of a Privatist Ethic in Early Seventeenth-Century France’, in Osler, Margaret J. (ed.), Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquillity: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sargent, Rose-Mary (1986). ‘Robert Boyle's Baconian Inheritance: A Response to Laudan's Cartesian Thesis’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 17:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargentich, T. (1974). ‘Locke and Ethical Theory: Two Ms. Pieces’, The Locke Newsletter. 5:.Google Scholar
Savonarola, Girolamo (1955–). Edizione Nazionale delle opere di Girolamo Savonarola, ed. Ferrara, Mario. Rome: A. Belardetti.Google Scholar
Saw, Ruth (1969). ‘Personal Identity in Spinoza’, Inquiry. 12:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxby, T. J. (1987). The Quest for the New Jerusalem, Jean de Labadie and the Labadists, 1610–1744. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Simon (1985). ‘Occultism and Reason’, in Holland, A. J. (ed.), Philosophy, Its History and Historiography. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Schankula, H. A. S. (1980). ‘Locke, Descartes, and the Science of Nature’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 41:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharf, Johannes (1643). Metaphysica Exemplaris, seu Prima Philosophia. 4th ed. Wittenberg.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel (1976). ‘Leibniz on Personal Identity and Moral Personality’, in Studia Leibnitiana. 8:.Google Scholar
Scheibler, Christoph (1636). Metaphysica. Geneva.Google Scholar
Schepers, H. (1966). ‘Leibniz' Arbeiten zu einer Reformation der Kategorien’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung. 20:.Google Scholar
Schepers, H. (1969). ‘Begriffsanalyse und Kategorialsynthese. Zur Verflechtung von Logik und Metaphysik bei Leibniz’, in Akten des Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses Hannover, 14–19 November 1966 (5 vols.) (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa). Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Schepers, H. (1975). ‘Leibniz' Disputationen De conditionibus: Ansätze zu einer juristischen Aussangenlogik’, in Akten des II. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses Hannover, 17–22 Juli 1972 (4 vols.) (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa). Stuttgart: Steiner, vol. 4.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad M. (1992). ‘Sensation, Occasionalism, and Descartes’, in Cummins, and Zoeller, 1992.Google Scholar
Schmaus, M. (1927). Die Psychologische Trinitätslehre des HI. Augustinus. Münster: Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Biggemann, Wilhelm (1983). Topica universalis: Eine Modellgeschichte humanistischer und barocker Wissenschaft. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. (1965). ‘Aristotle as a Cuttlefish: The Origin and Development of a Renaissance Image’, Studies in the Renaissance. 12:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. (1967). Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola (1469–1533) and His Critique of Aristotle. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. (1972). Cicero Scepticus. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. (1978). ‘Reappraisals in Renaissance Science’, History of Science. 16:.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, Charles B. (1981). Studies in Renaissance Philosophy and Science. London: Variorum Reprints.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. (1983a). Aristotle and the Renaissance. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. (1983b). John Case and Aristotelianism in Renaissance England (McGill-Queen's Studies in the History of Ideas 5). Kingston-Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. (1983c). ‘Aristotelianism in the Veneto and the Origins of Modern Science: Some Considerations on the Problem of Continuity’, in Olivieri, Luigi (ed.), Aristotelismo veneto e scienza moderna (2 vols.). Padua: Editrice Antenore.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. (1983d). ‘The Rediscovery of Ancient Skepticism in Modern Times’, in Burnyeat, M. (ed.), The Skeptical Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. (1984a). ‘William Harvey and Renaissance Aristotelianism: A Consideration of the Praefatio to De generatione animalium (1651)’, in Schmitz, Rudolf and Keil, Gundolf (eds.), Humanismus und Medizin. Weinheim: Acta Humaniora.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. (1984b). ‘Galileo and the Seventeenth-Century Text-Book Tradition’, in Galluzzi, P. (ed.), Novità celesti e crisi del sapere. Atti del convegno internazionale di studi galileiani. Florence: Barbera.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B. (1988). ‘The Rise of the Philosophical Textbook’, in Skinner, Schmitt, and Kessler, 1988.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B.; Quentin, Skinner; and Eckhard, Kessler (eds.) (1988). The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt-Lermann, Hans (1954). Der Versicherungsgedanke in deutschen Geistesleben des Barock und der AufkldrungMunich: J. Jehle.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (1987). ‘Pufendorf's Place in the History of Ethics’, Synthese. 72:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (ed.) (1990). Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant: An Anthology (2 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, G. (1970). Der Libertin. Zur Geistes und Sozialgeschichte des Bürgertums in 16. und 17. Jht.Stuttgart: J. B. Melzler.Google Scholar
Schneider, H.-P. (1967). Justitia Universalis. Quellenstudien zur Geschichte des ‘Christlichen Naturrechts’ bei Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Frankfurt: Klosterman.Google Scholar
Schneider, H.-P. (1979). ‘Die wissenschaftliche Beziehungen zwischen Leibniz und den beiden Cocceji (Heinrich und Samuel)’, in Humanismus und Naturrecht in Berlin, Brandenburg, Preussen, ed. Thieme, H.. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ivo (1968–69). ‘Der Mathematiker Abraham De Moivre (1667–1754)’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 5:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Ivo (1980). ‘Why Do We Find the Origin of a Calculus of Probabilities in the Seventeenth Century?’ in Hintikka, J., Gruender, D., and Agazzi, E. (eds.), Pisa Conference on the History and Philosophy of Science (1978). Proceedings (2 vols.). Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ivo (1981). ‘Leibniz on the Probable’, in Dauben, Joseph W. (ed.), Mathematical Perspectives: Essays on Mathematics and Its Historical Development Presented to Professor Dr. Kurt-Reinhard Biermann on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schneiders, W. (1966). ‘Naturrecht und Gerechtigkeit bei Leibniz’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung. 20:.Google Scholar
Schneiders, W. (1971). Naturrecht und Liebesethik. Zur Geschichte der praktischen Philosophie im Hinblick auf Christian Thomasius. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Schneiders, W. (ed.) (1989). Christian Thomasius 1655–1728. Interpretationen zu Werk und Wirkung. Miteiner Bibliographie der neueren Thomasius-Literatur. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Schofield, Robert E. (1970). Mechanism and Materialism: British Natural Philosophy in an Age of Reason. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scholem, Gershom (1961). Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Scholem, Gershom (1971). ‘Doenmeh’, in Encyclopaedia Judaica (16 vols.). New York: Macmillan, vol. 6, colls..Google Scholar
Scholem, Gershom (1973). Sabbatai Sevi: the Mystical Messiah (1626–1676), trans. Werblowsky, R. J. Zwi. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scholem, Gershom (1974). Kabbalah. Jerusalem: Keter.Google Scholar
Scholem, Gershom (1978). Kabbalah. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Schouls, Peter A. (1980). The Imposition of Method: A Study of Locke and Descartes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schouls, Peter A. (1992). Reasoned Freedom. John Locke and the Enlightenment. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schubart-Fikentscher, G. (1977). Christian Thomasius. Seine Bedeutung als Hochschullehrer am Beginn der deutschen Aufklärung (Sitzungsberichte der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig. Philologische-historische Klasse Bd. 119, Heft 4). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Schuhmann, Karl (1992). ‘Le vocabulaire de l'espace’, in Zarka, Yves-Charles (ed.), Hobbes et son vocabulaire. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Schüling, Hermann (1967). Bibliographie der psychologischen Literatur des 16. Jahrhunderts. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Schüling, Hermann (1969). Die Geschichte der axiomatischen Methode im 16. und beginnenden 17 Jahrhundert. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Schuster, John A. (1980). ‘Descartes' Mathesis universalis, 1619–28’, in Gaukroger, Stephen (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Schuster, John A. (1984). ‘Methodologies as Mythic Structures: A Preface to the Future Historiography of Method’, Metascience: Annual Review of the Australasian Association for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science. 1/2:.Google Scholar
Schuster, John A. (1986). ‘Cartesian Method as Mythic Speech: A Diachronic and Structural Analysis’, in Schuster, John A. and Yeo, Richard R. (eds.), The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method: Historical Studies. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, John A. (1993). ‘Whatever Should We Do with Cartesian Method? Reclaiming Descartes for the History of Science’, in Voss 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. F. (1952). The Scientific Work of René Descartes (1596–1650). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Scott, James Brown (ed.) (1934). The Spanish Origins of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Screech, M. A. (1983). Montaigne and Melancholy. The Wisdom of the Essay. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
ScudéryMadeleine de, (1806). Lettres de Mesdames de Scudéry, de Salvan de Saliez, et de Mademoiselle Descartes. Paris: Collin.Google Scholar
Sebba, G. (1964). Bibliographia Cartesiana. A Critical Guide to the Descartes Literature 1800–1960. The Hague: Martinus Nijhof.Google Scholar
Secada, J. E. K. (1990). ‘Descartes on Time and Causality’, Philosophical Review. 99:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, Alexander (1977). Jansenism in Seventeenth Century France: Voices from the Wilderness. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Seigel, Jerrold E. (1968). Rhetoric and Philosophy in Renaissance Humanism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiler, J. (1936). Der Zweck in der Philosophie des Franz Suarez. Innsbrück: F. Rauch.Google Scholar
Selden, John (1640). De iure naturali et gentium juxta disciplinam ebraeorum. London.Google Scholar
Selden, John (1663). Mare clausum: The Right and Dominion of the Sea in Two Books, trans. London, J. H..Google Scholar
Selden, John (1726). Opera omnia, ed. Wilkins, D. (3 vols.). London. (There is also a 1725 London ed.)Google Scholar
Sellier, Philippe (1970). Pascal et Saint Augustin. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar
Semedo, , Alvaro, S.J. (1642). Imperio de la China. Madrid.Google Scholar
Senault, Jean-François (1649). The Use of the Passions, trans. Henry, , of Monmouth, Earl. London.Google Scholar
Senault, Jean-François (1987). De l'usage des passions. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Seneca, (1614). The Works both Moral and Natural…., trans. Lodge, Thomas. London.Google Scholar
Senlis, Sébastien (1637). Les Entretiens du sage. Paris.Google Scholar
Senlis, Sébastien (1638). Les Maximes du sage. Paris.Google Scholar
Senlis, Sébastien (1642). Le Flambeau du juste pour la conduite des esprits supérieurs. Paris.Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel (1618). Epitome naturalis scientiae. Wittenberg.Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel (1619). De chymicorum cum Aristotelicis et Galenicis consensu ac dissensu liber I. Wittenberg. Also in Sennert 1641, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel (1636). Hypomnemata physica. Frankfurt-am-Main.Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel (1637). Hypomnemata physica. 2d. ed. Lyon.Google Scholar
Sennert, Daniel (1641). Opera omnia (3 vols.). Venice. (1676 ed. repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1987.)Google Scholar
Sepich, J. R. (1949). ‘Naturaleza de la filosofia primera o metafisica en Francesco Suarez’, Philosophia (Mendoza). 11–12:.Google Scholar
Serene, Eileen (1982). ‘Demonstrative Science’, in Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A., and Pinborg, J. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sergeant, John (1665). Sure-Footing in Christianity, or Rational Discourses on the Rule of Faith. London.Google Scholar
Sergeant, John (1696). The Method to Science. London.Google Scholar
Sergeant, John (1697). Solid Philosophy Asserted, against the Fancies of the Ideists: Or, The Method to Science Farther illustrated. With Reflections on Mr. Locke's Essay…. London. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1984.)Google Scholar
Sergeant, John (1698). Non Ultra: Or, A Letter to a Learned Cartesian. London. (Repr. Monist (1929), 39:.)Google Scholar
Sergeant, John (1700). Transnatural Philosophy, or Metaphysics. London.Google Scholar
Serveto, Miguel (1531). De trinitatis erroribus libri septem. Hagenau. (Repr. Frankfurt: Minerva G.M.B.H., 1965.)Google Scholar
Serveto, Miguel (1932). Two Treatises of Servetus on the Trinity, trans. Wilbur, E. M. (Harvard Theological Studies XVI). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sève, René (1989). Leibniz et l'école moderne du droit naturel. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Sextus, Empiricus (1933). Outlines of Pyrrhonism, in Sextus Empiricus, trans. Bury, R. G. (4 vols., Loeb Classical Library), vol. 1. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Sextus, Empiricus (1935). Against the Logicians, in Sextus Empiricus, trans. Bury, R. G. (4 vols., Loeb Classical Library), vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Sextus, Empiricus (1936). Against the Physicists, and Against the Ethicists, in Sextus Empiricus, trans. Bury, R. G. (4 vols., Loeb Classical Library), vol. 3. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Sextus, Empiricus (1949). Against the Professors, in Sextus Empiricus, trans. Bury, R. G. (4 vols., Loeb Classical Library), vol. 4. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Shafer, Glenn (1978). ‘Non-additive Probabilities in the Work of Bernoulli and Lambert’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 19:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper Earl of (1900). Characteristics, ed. Robertson, J. M. (2 vols.). London: Grant Richards.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven (1984). ‘Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology’, Social Studies of Science. 14:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Simon, Schaffer (1985). Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara J. (1969). John Wilkins. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara J. (1983). Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England; A Study of the Relationships between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sharrock, Robert (1660). ‘YπΌθ∊σισ ήθική [Hupothesis ethike] de officiis secundum naturae jus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Shea, William R. (1970). ‘Galileo's Atomic Hypothesis’, Ambix. 17:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, William R. (1972). Galileo's Intellectual Revolution. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shea, William R. (1991). The Magic of Numbers and Motion: The Scientific Career of René Descartes. Canton, Mass.: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Sherlock, William (1690). A Vindication of the Doctrine of the Holy and Ever Blessed Trinity. London.Google Scholar
Sherlock, William (1694). A Defence of Dr. Sherlock's Notion of a Trinity in Unity. London.Google Scholar
Sheynin, O. B. (1968). ‘On the Early History of the Law of Large Numbers’, Biometrika. 55:. (Repr. in Pearson, E. S. and Kendall, M. G., eds., Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability. Darien, Conn.: Hafner, 1970.)Google Scholar
Sheynin, O. B. (1970–1). ‘Newton and the Classical Theory of Probability’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 7:.Google Scholar
Sheynin, O. B. (1974). ‘On the Prehistory of the Theory of Probability’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 12:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirley, John W. (ed.) (1974). Thomas Harriot, Renaissance Scientist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shirley, John W. (1983). Thomas Harriot, A Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silhon, Jean (1624). Les deux vérités de Silhon: l'une de Dieu, et de sa providence, l'autre de l'immortalité de l'ame. Paris.Google Scholar
Silhon, Jean (1634). De l'immortalité de l'ame. Paris.Google Scholar
Silhon, Jean (1991). Les deux vérités de Silhon – l'une de Dieu, et de sa providence, l'autre de l'immortalité de l'ame, ed. Armogathe, J.-R.. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Sillem, Edward A. (1957). George Berkeley and the Proofs for the Existence of God. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Simmons, Alison (1994). ‘Explaining Sense Perception: A Scholastic Challenge’, Philosophical Studies. 73:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, G. (1981). ‘Les vérités éternelles de Descartes, évidences ontologiques’, Studia Cartesiana. 2:.Google Scholar
Simon, Gérard (1979). Kepler, astronome, astrologue. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Simon, Richard (1680). Critical History of the Old Testament. London.Google Scholar
Simon, Richard (1702). Lettres choisies. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Sinapius, Daniel (1645). Dissertationes ethicae. Leiden.Google Scholar
Sirven, J. (1930). Les années d'apprentissage de Descartes (1596–1621). Paris: Vrin. (Also Albi: Imprimerie Coopérative du Sud-Ouest, 1928.) (Repr. New York: Garland, 1987.)Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1978). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought (2 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1994). ‘Moral Ambiguity and the Renaissance Art of Eloquence’, Essays in Criticism. 44:.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1996). Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Mary M. (1982). Universal Languages and Scientific Taxonomy in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sleigh, R. C. (1990a). Leibniz & Arnauld. A Commentary on Their Correspondence. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sleigh, R. C. (1990b). ‘Leibniz on Malebranche on Causality’, in Cover, J. A. and Kuhlstad, Mark (eds.), Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.Google Scholar
Sleigh, Robert (1982). ‘Truth and Sufficient Reason in the Philosophy of Leibniz’, in Hooker, Michael (ed.), Leibniz: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Smiglecius, Martinus (1638). Logica [first ed. 1618]. Oxford.Google Scholar
Smiglecius, Martinus (1658). Logica [first ed. 1618]. Oxford.Google Scholar
Smith, A. Mark (1976). ‘Galileo's Theory of Indivisibles: Revolution or Compromise’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 27:.Google Scholar
Smith, John (1660). Select Discourses. London.Google Scholar
Smith, John (1821). Select Discourses. 3d ed. London.Google Scholar
Smith, John (1969). The True Way or Method of Attaining to Divine Knowledge, in Patrides, C. A. (ed.), The Cambridge Platonists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Matthew (1695). A Philosophical Discourse of the Nature of Rational and Irrational Souls. London.Google Scholar
Smith, Wesley D. (1979). The Hippocratic Tradition. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, A. J. (1975). Matter and Gravity in Newton's Physical Philosophy. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Snowdon, P. F. (1990). ‘Persons, Animals, and Ourselves’, in Gill, C. (ed.), The Person and the Human Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Société Générale Néerlandaise d'Assurances sur la vie et de Rentes Viagères (1898). Mémoires pour servir à I'historie des assurances sur la vie et des rentes viagères au Pays-Bos. Amsterdam.
Solomon, Howard M. (1972). Public Welfare, Science, and Propaganda in Seventeenth-Century France; The Innovations of Théophraste Renaudot. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sommerville, Johann P. (1984). ‘John Selden, the Law of Nature, and the Origins of Government’, Historical Journal. 27:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerville, Johann P. (1986). Politics and Ideology in England, 1603–1640. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sommerville, Johann P. (1992). Thomas Hobbes: Political Ideas in Historical Context. New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommervogel, C., et al. (1890–1932), Bihliothèque de la Compagnie de Jésus (11 vols.). Brussels: Schepens.Google Scholar
Sophie, Electress of Hanover (1927). Briefwechsel der Kurfilrstin Sophie von Hanover. Berlin: K. J. Koehler.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard (1980). Necessity, Cause and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle's Theory. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard (1983). Time, Creation and the Continuum. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sorbière, Samuel (1660). Lettres et discours de M. de Sorbière sur diverses matières curieuses. Paris.Google Scholar
Sorell, Tom (1986). Hobbes. London: Roudedge.Google Scholar
Sorell, Tom (1993). ‘Morals and Modernity in Descartes’, in Sorell, Tom (ed.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy: The Tension between the New and Traditional Philosophies from Machiavelli to Leibniz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorensen, K. E. (1976). ‘A Study of the De proportione motus by Marcus Marci de Kronland: Part I’, Centaurus. 20:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sortais, Gaston (1928–9). Le cartésianisme chez les Jésuites français au 17e et 18e siècles (Archives de philosophie, vol. 6, no. 3). Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest (ed.) (1987). Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
South, Robert (1693). Animadversions upon Dr. Sherlock's Book, Entituled A Vindication of the Holy and Ever Blessed Trinity. London.Google Scholar
South, Robert (1695). Tritheistn Charged upon Dr. Sherlock's New Notion of the Trinity. London.Google Scholar
Southgate, B. C. (1981). ‘Thomas White, 1593–1676: A Reputation and Its Decline’, Essex Recusant. 23:.Google Scholar
Southgate, B. C. (1993). ”Covetous of Truth”: The Life and Work of Thomas White, 1593–1676. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanneut, Michel (1973). Permanence du Stoïcisme: de Zénon à Malraux. Gembloux: J. Duculot.Google Scholar
Specht, Rainer (1966). Commercium mentis et corporis: über Kausalvorstellungen im Cartesianismus. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann Verlag.Google Scholar
Spellman, W. M. (1988). John Locke and the Problem of Depravity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spence, Jonathan (1984). The Memory Palace ofMatteo Ricci. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Sperling, Johann (1664). Institutiones physicae Johannis Sperlings Profess. Publ. Editio quinta, auctior & corrector …. Frankfurt, Wittemberg.Google Scholar
Spiller, Michael R. G. (1980). ‘Concerning Natural Experimental Philsophie’: Meric Casaubon and the Royal Society. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Spink, J. S. (1960). French Free-Thought from Gassendi to Voltaire. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus (1663). Renati des Cartes principiorum philosophiae … moregeometrico demonstratae per Benediclum de Spinoza … accessemnt ejusdem cogitata metaphysica …. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus (1670). Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Amsterdam. (The title page has the name of a false publisher in Hamburg.)Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus (1677). Opera posthuma. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus (1683). Miracles no Violation of the laws of Nature, trans. Blount, Charles. London.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus (1689). A Treatise Partly Theological and Partly Political … Translated out of the Latin. London.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus (1910). Short Treatise on God, Man, and His Weil-Being, ed. and trans. Wolf, A.. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus (1925). Opera, ed. Gebhardt, Carl (4 vols.). Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus (1928). The Correspondence of Spinoza, ed. and trans. Wolf, A.. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus (1985). Collected Works, vol. I, ed. and trans. Curley, E. M.. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus (1986). Korte Verhandeling van God de Mensch en deszelfs Welstand, ed. and trans. (Italian, ) Magnini, F.. L'Aquila: Japadre.Google Scholar
Spragens, Thomas A. (1973). The Politics of Motion: The World of Thomas Hobbes. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Sprat, Thomas (1667). The History of the Royal Society. London. (Repr. ed. Cope, Jackson I. and Jones, Harold Whitmore. St. Louis, Mo.: Washington University Press, 1958.)Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst (1723). Fundamenta chymiae dogmaticae & experimentalis, & quidem tum communioris physicae mechanicae pharmaceuticae ac medicae tum sublimioris sic dictae hermeticae atque alchymicae. Olim in privatos auditorum usus posita, jam vero indultu autoris publicae luci exposita…Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Stahl, Georg Ernst (1730). Philosophical Principles of Universal Chemistry: Or, the Foundation of a Scientifical Manner of Inquiring into and Preparing the Natural and Artificial Bodies for the Uses of Life … Design'd as a General Introduction to the Knowledge and Practice of Artificial Philosophy: Or, Genuine Chemistry in all Its Branches, trans. Shaw, Peter. London: Osborn and Longman.Google Scholar
Standaert, N. S.J. (1991). ‘Inculturation and Chinese-Christian Contacts in the Late Ming and Early Qing’, Ching Feng. 34:.Google Scholar
Stanley, Thomas (1655–62). The History of Philosophy (3 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Stanley, Thomas (1701). The History of Philosophy. 3d ed. London.Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean (1982). Montaigne en mouvement. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean (1985). Montaigne in Motion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Statuta Almae Universitatis D.D. Philosophorum, & Medicorum (1607). Padua.
Stein, Howard (1977). ‘Some Philosophical Prehistory of General Relativity’, in Earman, J., Glymour, C., Stachel, J. (eds.), Foundations of Space-Time Theories (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, no. 8). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Steneck, Nicholas (1974). ‘Albert the Great on the Classification of Internal Senses’, Isis. 65:.Google ScholarPubMed
Steneck, Nicholas (1982). ‘Greatrakes the Stroker: The Interpretation of Historians’, Isis. 73:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, W. P. (1986). The Theology of Huldryck Zwingli. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevin, Simon (1586). De Beghinselen der Weeghconst. Leiden. (Repr. with trans, in Crone, Ernst et al. (eds.), Principal Works (5 vols. in 6). Amsterdam: C. V. Swets & Zeitlinger, 1955–66), vol. I.)Google Scholar
Stewart, Roy A. (1961). Rabbinic Theology. Edinburgh, London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Stierius, Johannes (1647). Praecepta doctrinae … ethicae … brevibus tabellis compacta. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stigler, Stephen M. (1986a). The History of Statistics. The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, Stephen M. (1986b). ‘John Craig and the Probability of History: From the Death of Christ to the Birth of Laplace’, Journal of the American Statistical Association. 81:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward (1659). Irenicum: A Weapon-Salve for the Churches Wounds …: Whereby a Foundation Is Laid for the Churches Peace, and the Accommodation of Our Present Differences…London.Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward (1662). Origines Sacrae. London.Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward (1664). A Rational Account of the Grounds of Protestant Religion. London.Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward (1687). The Doctrine of the Trinity and Transubstantiation Compared: The Second Part. London.Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward (1697a). A Discourse in Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity: With an Answer to the Late Socinian Objections against It from Scripture, Antiquity and Reason. London.Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward (1697b). An Answer to Mr. Locke's Letter, concerning Some Passages Relating to His Essay of Humane Understanding. London.Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward (1698). An Answer to Mr. Locke's Second Letter; Wherein His Notion of IDEAS Is Prov'd to be Inconsistent with It Self, and with the ARTICLES of the CHRISTIAN FAITH. London.Google Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward (1710). The Works of that Eminent and Most Learned Prelate, Dr. Edw. Stillingfleet, Late Lord Bishop of Worcester (6 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Stolleis, M. (1988). Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Stolpe, Sven (1966). Christina of Sweden. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence (1964). ‘The Educational Revolution in England 1560–1640’, Past and Present. 28:.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1952). Persecution and the Art of Writing. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1963). Political Philosophy of Hobbes. Its Basis and Genesis. 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, (1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1936.)Google Scholar
Strier, Richard (1983). Love Known. Theology and Experience in George Herbert's Poetry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco (1619). Metaphysicarum disputationum, in quibus, & universa naturalis theologia ordinatè traditur, & quaestiones ad omnes duodecim Aristotelis libros pertinentes, accuratè disputantur, tomi duo…. Venice. (First ed. Salamanca, 1597.)Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco (1856–78). Opera Omnia, ed. André, D. M. (28 vols.). Paris. (Disputationes Metaphysicae (vols. 25–6) repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1965.)Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco (1944). Selections from Three Works (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, (1960–6). Disputationes metafisicas, ed. and trans. (Latin, , with Spanish, trans.) Romeo, S. Rábade, Sánchez, S. Caballero, and Zanón, A. Puigcerver (7 vols.). Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, (1964). On Formal and Universal Unity, De unitate formali et universali, trans. Ross, J. F.. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco (1971–81). Tractatus de legibus, ac Deo legislatore, bilingual ed. trans. (Spanish) Pereña, L. et al. (8 vols.). Madrid: Consijo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Instituto Francisco de Vitoria.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco (1976). De Unitate Individuali eiusque Principio / Über die Individualität und das Individuationsprinzip, ed. and trans. (German) Specht, R. (2 vols.). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco (1978–81). De anima: commentaria una cum quaestionibus in libros Aristotelis De anima / comentarios a los libros de Aristoteles Sobre el alma, ed. and trans. (Spanish) Castellote, Salvador. Madrid: Sociedad de Estudios y Publicaciones.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco (1982). Suarez on Individuation. Metaphysical Disputation V: Individual Unity and Its Principle, ed. and trans. Gracia, J. J. E.. Milwaukee, Wisc.: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Suárez, Francisco (1983). On the Essence of Finite Being, etc., trans. Wells, Norman. Milwaukee, Wisc.: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Suchon, Gabrielle (1988). Traité de la morale et de la politique: La liberté, ed. Auffret, Séverine. Paris: Des femmes.Google Scholar
Süssmilch, Johann (1775). Die göttliche Ordnung in den veränderungen des menschlichen Geschlechts. 3d ed. Berlin.Google Scholar
Sylla, Edith (1982). ‘The Oxford Calculators’, in Kenny, Kretzmann, and Pinborg, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvius, Iacobus (1626). Disputatio philosophica continens quaestionum decadem,…praeside Francone Burgersdicio…. Leiden.Google Scholar
Tachau, Katherine H. (1988). Vision and Certitude in the Age of Ockham: Optics, Epistemology and the Foundations of Semantics, 1250–1345. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tack, Reiner (1974). Untersuchungen zum Philosophie- und Wissenschafisbegriff bei Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655). Meisenheim am Glan: Verlag Anton Hain.Google Scholar
Talaska, Richard A. (1988). ‘Analytic and Synthetic Method according to Hobbes’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 26:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmor, Sascha (1981). Glanvill: The Uses and Abuses of Scepticism. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Tamm, Ditlev (1986). ‘Pufendorf und Dänemark’, in Samuel von Pufendorf 1632–1982, ed. Modéer, K. Å.. Stockholm: Nordiska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Tatakis, Basile (1949). La philosophie Byzantine, second supplementary facicle to Brehier, Emile, Histoire de la Philosophie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Taton, René (1965). Les origines de l'Académie royale des sciences (Palais de la Découverte, D 105). Paris: Palais de la Découverte.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. (1908). Hobbes. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. E. (1965). ‘The Ethical Doctrine of Hobbes’, in Brown, K. C. (ed.), Hobbes Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1983). ‘Réponse à Jean-Marie Beyssade’, Revue internationale de philosophie. 146:.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jeremy (1660). Ductor dubitantium, or The Rule of Conscience …. London.Google Scholar
Teichman, Jenny (1985). ‘The Definition of Person’, Philosophy. 60:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telesio, Bernardino (1965–76). De Rerum Natura Juxta Propria Principia, ed. and trans. (Italian) Franco, Luigi (3 vols.). Consenza 1965, Consenza 1974, and Florence: La Nuova Italia, 1976.Google Scholar
Temple, William (1814). Works (4 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Temple, William (1908). Upon the Garden of Epicurus, ed. Sieveking, A. F.. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Temple, William (1963). Five Miscellaneous Essays, ed. Monk, S. H., Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Tennant, R. C. (1982). ‘The Anglican Response to Locke's Theory of Personal Identity’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 43:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ter Meulen, Jacob, and Diermanse, P. J. J. (1950). Bibliographie des écrits imprimés de Hugo Grotius. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Tesauro, Emanuele (1670). La filosofia morale derivata dall'alto fonte del grande Aristotele Stagirita. Turin.Google Scholar
Testu, Mauroy, Jean, abbé (1666). Les Doctrines de la raison, ou l'honnesteté des moeurs selon les maximes de Sénèque. Paris.Google Scholar
Thackray, Arnold (1970). Atoms. and Powers: An Essay on Newtonian Matter-Theory and the Development of Chemistry (Harvard Monographs in the History of Science). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Theophrastus redivivus, edizione prima e critica (1981–82). Eds. Canziani, G. and Paganini, G.. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo (1981). ‘Locke's Concept of Person’, in Brandt, R. (ed.), John Locke. Symposium Wolfenbüttel 1979. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo (1983). Lockes Theorie des personalen Identität. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo (1990). John Locke. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo (1991). ‘Cudworth and Seventeenth-Century Theories of Consciousness’, in Gaukroger, S. (ed.), The Uses of Antiquity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo (1994). ‘Hume's Notions of Consciousness and Reflection in Context’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 2:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieme, H. (ed.) (1979). Humanismus und Naturrecht in Berlin, Brandenburg, Preussen. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thijssen-Schoute, C. Louise (1950). ‘Le cartésianisme au Pays-Bas’, in Dijksterhuis, et al. 1950.Google Scholar
Thijssen-Schoute, C. Louise (1954). Nederlands Cartesianisme, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, Saint (1882–). Opera omnia, ed. Leonis, XIII. Rome: Typographia Polyglotta.Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, Saint (1927). Opuscula omnia, ed. Mandonnet, P. (5 vols.). Paris: Lethielleux.Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, Saint (1946). De ente et essentia, ed. Boyer, C.. Rome: Aedes Universitatis Gregorianae.Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, Saint (1950). In duodecim libros metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio, ed. Cathala, M.-R. and Spiazzi, R. M.. Turin and Rome: Marietti.Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas, Saint (1952–4). Truth, trans. Mulligan, R. W. (3 vols). Chicago: Regnery.Google Scholar
ThomasAquinas, Saint Aquinas, Saint (1953). De physico auditu sive physicorum Aristotelis, ed. Pirota, Angelus M.. Naples: M. D'Auria.Google Scholar
ThomasAquinas, Saint Aquinas, Saint (1954). De natura loci, opusculum 52 of Opuscula Philosophica, ed. Spiazzi, M.. Turin: Marietti.Google Scholar
ThomasAquinas, Saint Aquinas, Saint (1961). Commentary on the Metaphysics of Aristotle, ed. and trans. Rowan, J. P. (2 vols). Chicago: Henry Regnery.Google Scholar
ThomasAquinas, Saint Aquinas, Saint (1963). Commentary on the Physics of Aristotle, trans. Blackwell, Richard J., Spath, Richard J., and Thirlkel, W. Edmund, intro. Bourke, Vernon J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
ThomasAquinas, Saint Aquinas, Saint (1964–80). Summa theologiae, ed. and trans. by Gilby, Thomas et al. (61 vols). London: Blackfriars' Eyne and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
ThomasAquinas, Saint Aquinas, Saint (1965). Selected Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas: The Principles of Nature, On Being and Essence, On the Virtues in General, On Free Choice, trans. Goodwin, Robert P.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
ThomasAquinas, Saint Aquinas, Saint (1968a). On the Unity of the Intellect against the Averroists, trans. Zedler, B. H., Milwaukee, , Wisc.: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
ThomasAquinas, Saint Aquinas, Saint (1968b). Questiones de anima, ed. Robb, J. H.. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
ThomasAquinas, Saint Aquinas, Saint (1968c). On Being and Essence, ed. and trans. Maurer, A.. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
ThomasAquinas, Saint Aquinas, Saint (1984). Questions on the Soul, trans. Milwaukee, J. H. Robb., Wisc.: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, I. (1964). ‘Medieval Aftermath: Oxford Logic and Logicians of the Seventeenth Century’, in Oxford Studies Presented to Daniel Callus (Oxford Historical Society). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, I. (1967). ‘Logic, History of: Interregnum and Precursors of Modern Logic’, in Edwards, P. (ed.), The. Encyclopedia of Philosophy (8 vols.). London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith (1971). Religion and the Decline of Magic. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian (1688). Institutiones jurisprudentiae divinae. Frankfurt a.d.O., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian (1705). Fundamenta juris naturæ et gentium ex sensu communi deducta. Halle and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian (1720). Institutionum jurisprudentiae divinae libri tres. Halle.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Jacob (1658). Breviarium ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Lynn (1923–58). A History of Magic and Experimental Science (8 vols.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, Mark (1991). ‘Same Human Being, Same Person?Philosophy. 66:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, B. (1987). ‘Villey, Ockham and the Origin of Individual Rights’, in Witte, John Jr., and Alexander, Frank S. (eds.), The Weightier Matters of the Law … A Tribute to Harold Berman. Atlanta: Scholar's Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, B. (1988). ‘Conciliarism, Corporatism, and Individualism: The Doctrine of Individual Rights in Gerson’, Cristianesimo nella storia. 9:.Google Scholar
Tierney, B. (1989). ‘Origins of Natural Rights Language: Texts and Contexts, 1150–1250’, History of Political Thought. 10:.Google Scholar
Tierney, B. (1991). ‘Marsilius on Rights’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 52:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillotson, John (1728). The Works of the Most Reverend Dr. John Tillotson (3 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Tillotson, John (1748). The Works of the Most Reverend Dr. John Tillotson (10 vols.). Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Timpler, Clemens (1604). Metaphysicae systema methodicum. Steinfurt.Google Scholar
Timpler, Clemens (1605). Physica, seu philosophiae naturalis systema methodicum, in tres partes digestum … pars prima; complectens empsychologiam. Hannover.Google Scholar
Timpler, Clemens (1607). Philosophiae practicae systema methodicum … pars prima complectens ethicam generalem …. Hanau.Google Scholar
Tipton, I. C. (1974). Berkeley, the Philosophy of Immaterialism. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Tipton, I. C. (ed.) (1977). Locke on Human Understanding. Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Todhunter, Isaac (1865). A History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Toland, John (1696). Christianity Not Mysterious. London.Google Scholar
Toletus, Franciscus (1573). Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in octo libros de Physica auscultatione. Venice.Google Scholar
Toletus, Franciscus (1589). Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in octo libros de Physica auscultatione. Venice.Google Scholar
Toletus, Franciscus (1594). Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in tres libros Aristotelis de anima. Cologne.Google Scholar
Toletus, Franciscus (1596). Commentaria una cum quaestionibus universam in Aristotelis Logicam. Cologne.Google Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio (1958). ‘La tradizione delle categorie aristoteliche nella filosofia moderna sino a Kant’, Studi Urbinati. 32–B:.Google Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio (1959). ‘La nécessité des lois de la nature au XVIII siècle et chez Kant en 1762’, Revue d'histoire des sciences. 12:.Google Scholar
Tonnies, F. (1925). Thomas Hobbes. Leben und Lehre. 3d ed. Stuttgart: Frommann. (1st ed. 1896.)Google Scholar
Topliss, Patricia (1966). The Rhetoric of Pascal: A Study of His Art of Persuasion in the ‘Provinciales’ and the Pensées. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Torricelli, Evangelista (1644). De dimensione parabolae, solidique hyperbolici problemata duo. Florence. In Torricelli, 1919–44, vol. 1, pt. 1.Google Scholar
Torricelli, Evangelista (1919–44). Opere di Evangelista Torricelli, ed. Loria, Gino and Vassura, Giuseppe (4 vols. in 5). Vols. 1–3, Faenza: G. Montanari, 1919; vol.4, Faenza: Fratelli Lega, 1944.Google Scholar
Torricelli, Evangelista (1956). Lettere e documenti riguardanti Evangelista Torricelli, ed. Rossini, Giuseppe. Faenza: Fratelli Lega.Google Scholar
Tournemine, René-Joseph (1703). ‘Conjectures sur l'union de l'âme et du corps’, and ‘Suite des conjectures …’, Mémoires pour l'histoire des sciences et des beaux arts (Mémoires de Trévoux) May 1703: and June 1703:.Google Scholar
Traherne, Thomas (1675). Christian Ethicks. London.Google Scholar
Traherne, Thomas (1962). Christian Ethicks (1675). Published as The Way to Blessedness, ed. Bottrall, Margaret. London: Faith Press.Google Scholar
Traherne, Thomas (1968). Christian Ethicks, ed. Marks, C. L. and Guffey, G. R.. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Traité des trois imposteurs (1973), ed. Rétat, Piere. Saint-Etienne: Universités de la Région Rhône-Alpes.Google Scholar
Trattato dei tre impostori. La vita e lo spirito del Signor Benedetto de Spinoza (1994). French, and texts, Italian, ed. Silvia Berti. Turin: Einuadi.Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, Adolf (1908). ‘Zur Geschichte des Wortes Person’, Kant-Studien. 13:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trentman, John A. (1976). ‘The Study of Logic and Language in England in the Early Seventeenth Century’, Historiographia Unguistica. 3:.Google Scholar
Trentman, John A. (1982). ‘Scholasticism in the Seventeenth Century’, in Kenny, Kretzmann, and Pinborg, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevor-Roper, Hugh (1967). ‘Three Foreigners: The Philosophers of the Puritan Revolution’, in Religion, the Reformation and Social Change. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, Hugh (1987a). Catholics, Anglicans and Puritans. Seventeenth-Century Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, Hugh (1987b). ‘Nicholas Hill, the English Atomist’, in Trevor-Roper, 1987a.Google Scholar
Trexler, Richard C. (1971). ‘Une table florentine d'espérance de vie’, Annales: Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations. 26:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1979). Natural Rights Tlieories. Their Origin and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1982). ‘“The Ancient Law of Freedom”: John Selden and the Civil War’, in Morrill, J. (ed.), Reactions to the English Civil War 1642–1649, New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1983). ‘Grotius, Carneades, and Hobbes’, Crotiana. N.s. 4:. (Published by the Grotius Committee of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.)Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1987a). ‘The “Modern” Theory of Natural Law’, in Pagden, Anthony (ed.), The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1987b). ‘Optics and Sceptics: The Philosophical Foundations of Hobbes’ Political Though’, in Leites, Edmund (ed.), Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1988). ‘Hobbes and Descartes’, in Rogers, G. A. J. and Ryan, A. (eds.), Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1989). Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1993). Philosophy and Government 1572–1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard (forthcoming). ‘Grotius and Pufendorf’, in Bödeker, H. E. and Hont, I. (eds.), Unsocial Sociability, Natural Law and the Eighteenth-Century Discourse on Society. London: Routledge.
Tulloch, John (1872). Rational Theology and Christian Philosophy in England in the Seventeenth Century (2 vols.). Edinburgh: William Blackwood.Google Scholar
Tully, J[ames] (1988). ‘Governing Conduct’, in Leites, Edmund (ed.), Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tully, James (1980). A Discourse on Property. John Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James (1993). An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turbayne, Colin M. (ed.) (1982). Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Turnbull, G. H. (1947). Dury, Hartlib, Comenius. London: University Press of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Turner, John (1685). A Discourse concerning the Messias … To Which is Prefixed a Large Preface, Asserting and Explaining the Doctrine of the Blessed Trinity, against the Late Writer of the Intellectual System. London.Google Scholar
Turrettini, Jean-Alphonse (1692). Pyrrhonismus pontificus. Leiden.Google Scholar
Tuveson, Ernest (1955). ‘Locke and the Dissolution of the Ego’, Modern Philology. 52:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuveson, Ernest (1960). The Imagination as a Means of Grace: Locke and the Aesthetics of Romanticism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, James (1701). A Brief Disquisition of the Law of Nature, according to the Principles and Method Laid Down in the Reverend Dr. Cumberland's … Latin Treatise on that Subject …. Rev. ed. London. (Original ed., London, 1692.)Google Scholar
Urbach, Peter (1987). Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science: An Account and a Reappraisal. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Urmson, J. O. (1967). ‘Ideas’, in Edwards, P. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ussher, James (1650–4). Annales veteris et novi Testamenti. London.Google Scholar
Uzgalis, William L. (1990). ‘Relative Identity and Locke's Principle of Individuation’, History of Philosophy Quarterly. 7:.Google Scholar
Vailati, Ezio (1985). ‘Leibniz's Theory of Personal Identity in the New Essays’, Studia Leibnitiana. 17:.Google Scholar
Vailati, Ezio (1986). ‘Leibniz on Necessary and Contingent Predication’, Studia Leibnitiana. 18:.Google Scholar
Valente, José Angel (1974). Ensayo sobre Miguel de Molinos. Barcelona: Barral Editores.Google Scholar
Valla, Lorenzo (1688). De Linguae Latinae Elegantiae. Cambridge.Google Scholar
van den Berg, Jan (1989). ‘Menasseh ben Israel, Henry More and Johannes Hoornbeeck on the Preexistence of the Soul’, in Kaplan, Y., Méchoulan, H., and Popkin, R., (eds.), Menasseh ben Israel and His World. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
van der Wall, Ernestine (1987). De mystieke chiliast Petrus Serrarius (1600–1669) en zijn wereld. Dordrecht: ICG Printing.Google Scholar
van der Wall, Ernestine (1989). ‘Petrus Serrarius and Menasseh ben Israel: Christian Millenarianism and Jewish Messianism in Seventeenth-Century Amsterdam’, in Kaplan, Y., Méchoulan, H., and Popkin, R., (eds.), Menasseh ben Israel and His World. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Van Edmond, Warren (1985). ‘A Catalog of François Viète's Printed and Manuscript Works’, in Folkerts, Menso und Lindgren, Uta (eds.), Mathemata: Festschrift fur Helmuth Gericke. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Van Helmont, F. M. (1677). Ad Fundamenta cabbalae aëto-paedo-melissaeae, in Rosenroth, Knorr 1677.Google Scholar
Van Helmont, F. M. (1682). A Cabbalistical Dialogue in Answer to the Opinion of a Learned Doctor in Philosophy and Theology, trans. Foote, D.. London.Google Scholar
Van Helmont, F. M. (1685). The Paradoxal Discourse … concerning the Macrocosm and Microcosm. London.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Henry G. (1963). The Problem of Certainty in English Thought 1630–1690. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Melsen, Andrew G. (1960). From Atomos to Atom: The History of the Concept Atom. New York: Harper and Brothers. (, Earlier eds., 1949, 1952.)Google Scholar
van Schurman, Anna Maria (1638). Amica disserlatio inter Annam Mariam Schurmanniam et Andr. Rivetum de capacitate ingenii muliebris ad scientias. Paris.Google Scholar
van Schurman, Anna Maria (1641). Dissertatio logica de ingenii muliebris ad doctrinam et meliores litteras aptitudine, cui accedunt epistolae aliquot (Schurmanniae ipsius et Riveti) ejusdem argumenti. Leiden.Google Scholar
van Schurman, Anna Maria (1648). Nobiliss Virginis Annae Mariae à Schurman, Opuscula. Hebraea, Graeca, Latina, Gallica, prosaica et metrica. Leiden. (Repr. 1650, 1652, 1794.)Google Scholar
van Schurman, Anna Maria (1673). Euchlepia seu Melioris partis electio…. Altona.Google Scholar
Vanini, Giulio Cesare (1615). Amphiteatrum aeternae providentiae. Lyon.Google Scholar
Vanini, Giulio Cesare (1616). De admirandis naturae reginae Deaque mortalium arcanis libri IV. Paris.Google Scholar
Vanini, Giulio Cesare (1990). Opera, ed. Papuli, G. and Raimondi, F. P. (4 vols.). Galatina: Congedo.Google Scholar
Vasoli, Cesare (1968). La dialettica e la retorica dell'Umanesimo: ‘Invenzione’ e ‘Metodo’ nella cultura del XV e XVI secolo. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Vasoli, Cesare (1974). Profezia e ragione: Studi sulla cultura del Cinquencento e del Seicento. Naples: Morano.Google Scholar
Vasquez, G[abriel] (1598–1617). Opera Omnia. Alcalà.Google Scholar
Vasquez, G[abriel] (1620). Commentariorum ac disputationum in Primam Partem s. Thomae tomus primus, Disputatio CIV. Lyon.Google Scholar
Vasquez, Gabriel (1598). Commentarium ac Disputationum in lam Partem D. Thomae. Compluti.Google Scholar
Vasquez, Gabriel (1609). Commentariorum ac disputationum in Primam Partem S. Thomae tomus primus (secundus), Disputatio CIV (2 vols.). Ingoldstadt.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Thomas (1984). Works, ed. Rudrum, Alan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vaughn, K. I. (1980). John Locke, Economist and Social Scientist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velsten, Heinrich (1620). Centuria quaestionum ethicarum. Giessen.Google Scholar
Verbeek, Theo (1988). La querelle d'Utrecht. Paris: Les impressions nouvelles.Google Scholar
Verbeek, Theo (1992a). Descartes and the Dutch: Early Reactions to Cartesianism (1637–1650) (Journal of the History of Philosophy Monograph Series). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Verbeek, Theo (1992b), ‘“Ens per Accidens”: Le origini della Querelle di Utrecht’, Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana. 71:.Google Scholar
Verbeek, Theo (ed.) (1993). Descartes et Regius: Autour de l'Eplication de l'esprit. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Verbeek, Theo (1994). ‘Regius's Fundamenta Physices’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 55:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verga, Leonardo (1964). La filosofia morale di Malebranche. Milan: Società editrice vita e pensiero.Google Scholar
Vernière, P. (1982). Spinoza et la pensée française avant la Révolution. 2d ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian (1979). ‘Frances Yates and the Writing of History’, Journal of Modern History. 51:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, Brian (ed.) (1984). Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, Brian (1991). ‘On the Goal of the Occult Sciences in the Renaissance’, in Kauffmann, Georg (ed.), Die Renaissance im Blick der Nationen Europas. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian (1992). ‘Critical Reactions to the Occult Sciences during the Renaissance’, in Ullmann-Margalit, E. (ed.), The Scientific Enterprise (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 146). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Vidgrain, J. (1923). Le Christianisme dans la philosophie de Malebranche. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Viète, François (1600). Apollonius Gallus. Paris.Google Scholar
Viète, François (1615). De aequationum recognitione et emendatione tractatus duo. Paris.Google Scholar
Viète, François (1646). Francisci Vietae Opera mathematica, ed. , Frans SchootenLeiden. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1970.)Google Scholar
Vilain, Christiane (1993). Huygens et le mouvement relatif. Paris. Thesis, Université de Paris VII.Google Scholar
Villey, M. (1975). La formation de la pensée juridique moderne. Paris: Montchretien.Google Scholar
Villey, Pierre (1908). Les sources et l'évolution des Essais de Montaigne. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Villey, Pierre (1972). Les Essais de Montaigne. Paris: Nizet.Google Scholar
Vincent, Le P. Jean (1658–71). Cursus philosophicus (5 vols.). Toulouse.Google Scholar
Vincent, Le P. Jean (1660). Cursus philosophicus. Toulouse.Google Scholar
Viret, Pierre (1564). Instruction crestienne en la doctrine de la loy de l'evangile…. Geneva.Google Scholar
Viret, Pierre (1565). L'interim fait par dialogues. Lyon.Google Scholar
Vives, Juan Luis (1979). Against the Pseudodialecucians, ed. and trans. Guerlac, Rita. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Vives, Juan Luis (1990). The Passions of the Soul. The Third Book of De Anima et Vita, trans. Norena, Carlos G.. Lewiston, N.Y.: Mellen.Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory (1975). Plato's Universe. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Vleeschauwer, H. J. (1937). ‘Descartes et Comenius’, in Congrès Descartes: Travaux du IXe Congrès International de Philosophie. Paris, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Vleeschauwer, H. J. (1938). ‘Les Antinomies kantiennes de la Clavis Universalis’, Mind. 47:.Google Scholar
Vleeschauwer, H. J. (1953–4). ‘Les Antécédents du Transcendentalisme Kantien: Geulincx et Kant’, Kant Studien. 45:.Google Scholar
Voet, Leon (1969–72). The Golden Compasses: A History and Evaluation of the Printing and Publishing Activities of the Officiana Plantiniana at Antwerp (2 vols.). Amsterdam: Van Gend.Google Scholar
Vogel, C. J. (1963). ‘The Concept of Personality in Greek and Christian Thought’, Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy. 2:.Google Scholar
Vogelsang, Ioannes (1624). Quaestionum philosophicarum decas una … praeside … Francone Burgers-dicio…. Leiden.Google Scholar
Vollrath, E. (1962). ‘Die Gliederung der Metaphysik in eine Metaphysica generalis und eine Metaphysica specialis’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung. 16:.Google Scholar
Voltaire, François Marie Arouet (1785). Essai sur les probabilités en fait de justice, in Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire (70 vols.). Paris: Société Littéraire-Typographique, vol. 30.Google Scholar
Voss, Stephen (ed.) (1993). Essays on the Philosophy and Science of René Descartes. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vossius, Dionysius (1641). R. Mosis Maimonidae De idolatria liber, cum interpretatione Latine et notis Dionysii Vossii. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerardus Joannes (1641). De theologia gentili et physiologia Christiana, sive de origine ac progressu idolatriae. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Waard, Cornelis (1936). L'Expérience barométrique: Ses antécédents et ses explications. Thouars: Imprimerie nouvelle.Google Scholar
Waard, Cornelis (1953). ‘Un Entretien avec Descartes en 1634 ou 1635’, Archives internationales d'Histoire des Sciences. 6:.Google Scholar
Wachter, Johann Georg (1699). Der Spinozismus im Jüdenthumb, oder die von dem heutigen Jüdentumb und dessen Geheimen Kabbala vergötterte Welt. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wade, Ira O. (1938). The Clandestine Organization and Diffusion of Philosophic Ideas in France from 1710–1750. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Waithe, M. E. (ed.) (1989). Medieval, Renaissance, and Enlightenment Women Philosophers, a.d. 500–1600 (A History of Women Philosophers). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Waithe, M. E. (ed.) (1991). Modern Women Philosophers, 1600–1900 (A History of Women Philosophers). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Walaeus, Antonius (1620). Compendium ethicae Aristotelicae ad normam veritatis Christianiae revocatum. Leiden.Google Scholar
Waldman, Theodore (1959). ‘Origins of the Legal Doctrine of Reasonable Doubt’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 20:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Daniel Pickering (1958). Spiritual and Demonic Magic from Ficino to Campanella. London: Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
Walker, Daniel Pickering (1964). The Decline of Hell: Seventeenth-Century Discussion of Eternal Torment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Daniel Pickering (1972). The Ancient Theology: Studies in Christian Platonism from the Fifteenth to the Eighteenth Century. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Walker, Daniel Pickering (1981). Unclean Spirits: Possession and Exorcism in France and England in the Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Daniel Pickering (1984a). ‘Medical Spirits and God and the Soul’, in Fattori, M. and Bianchi, M. (eds.), Spiritus (Lessico Intellettuale Europeo: IV° Colloquio Internazionale, Roma, 7–9 gennaio 1983). Rome: Ateneo.Google Scholar
Walker, Daniel Pickering (1984b). ‘Valentine Greatrakes, the Irish Stroker and the Question of Miracles’, in Castex, P.-G. (ed.), Mélanges sur la littérature de la Renaissance à la mémoire de V. L. Saulnier. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Walker, Daniel Pickering (1986). Il concetto di spirito o anima in Henry More e Ralph Cudworth. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Walker, Nigel (1968). Crime and Insanity in England. Vol. 1. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Ralph (1983). ‘Gassendi and Scepticism’, in Burnyeat, Myles (ed.), The Sceptical Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Walkington, Thomas (1639). The Optick Glass of Humours. London.Google Scholar
Wallace, William A. (1959). The Scientific Methodology of Theodoric of Freiburg. Fribourg: University of Fribourg Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, William A. (1972–4). Causality and Scientific Explanation (2 vols.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, William A. (1981). Prelude to Galileo: Essays on Medieval and Sixteenth-Century Sources of Galileo's Thought (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 62). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Wallace, William A. (1984). Galileo and His Sources: The Heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo's Science. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, William A. (1988a). ‘Randall Redivivus: Galileo and the Paduan Aristotelians’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 49:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, William A. (1988b). ‘Traditional Natural Philosophy’, in Skinner, Schmitt, and Kessler, 1988.Google Scholar
Wallace, William A. (1992). Galileo's Logic of Discovery and Proof: The Background, Content, and Use of His Appropriated Treatises on Aristotle's ‘Posterior Analytics’. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, John (1670). Mechanica, sive de Motu. London.Google Scholar
Wallis, John (1693–9). Johannis Wallis S.T.D…. Opera Mathematica (3 vols.). Oxford. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1972.)Google Scholar
Wallis, John (1729). Institutio logicae. Oxford. (1st ed. 1687.)Google Scholar
Walther, RolfTribus impostoribus, de (1960), trans. ed. Bartsch, Gerhard. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Walton, Craig (1972). De la recherche du bien: A Study of Malebranche's Science of Ethics. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Richard (1911). The Life of the Learned and Pious Dr. Henry More. London: The Theosophical Society.Google Scholar
Ward, Seth (1652). A Philosophical Essay towards an Eviction of the Being and Attributes of God. The Immortality of the Soule. The Truth and Authority of Scripture. Oxford.Google Scholar
Warren, Edward (1667). No Praeexistence. Or a Brief Dissertation against the Hypothesis of Humane Souls, Living in a State Antecedaneous to This. London.Google Scholar
Warrender, Howard (1957). The Political Philosophy of Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Warrender, Howard (1960). ‘The Place of God in Hobbes's Philosophy: A Reply to Mr. Plamenatz’, Political Studies. 8:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, J. W. N. (1965). Hobbes's System of Ideas: A Study in the Political Significance of Philosophical Theories. London: Hutchinson. (2d ed 1973.)Google Scholar
Watson, Richard A. (1964). ‘A Note on the Probabilistic Physics of Règis’, Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences. 17:.Google Scholar
Watson, Richard A. (1966). The Downfall of Cartesianism 1673–1712 (International Archives of the History of Ideas, 2.) The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Watson, Richard A. (1982). ‘Transubstantiation among the Cartesians’, in Lennon, T. M., Nicholas, J. M., and Davis, J. W. (eds.), Problems of Cartesianism. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Richard A. (1987). The Breakdown of Cartesian Metaphysics. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Watt, Ian (1957). The Rise of the Novel. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Isaac (1726). Logick: Or, The Right Use of Reason. 2d ed. London. (Repr. New York: Garland, 1984.)Google Scholar
Wear, Andrew (1985). ‘Explorations in Renaissance Writings on the Practice of Medicine’, in Wear, A., French, R. K., and Lonie, I. M. (eds.), The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Webb, John (1669). An Historical Essay Endeavoring a Probability That the Language of the Empire of China Is the Primitive Language. London.Google Scholar
Weber, Jean-Paul (1964). La constitution du texte des Regulae. Paris: Sociètè d'èdition d'enseignement supèrieur.Google Scholar
Weber, Jean-Paul (1972). ‘La Mèthode de Descartes d'après les Regulae’, Archives de Philosophic. 35:.Google Scholar
Webster, Charles (1970). Samuel Hartlib and the Advancement of Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, Charles (1975). The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine and Reform, 1626–1660. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Webster, Charles (1983). From Paracelsus to Newton: Magic and the Making of Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, Charles (1986). ‘The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine and Reform 1626–1660’, in Ullmann-Margalit, E. (ed.), The Prism of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Wedeking, Gary (1990). ‘Locke on Personal Identity and the Trinity Controversy of the 1695s’, Dialogue. 29:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Andrew (1991). Boehme: An Intellectual Biography of the Seventeenth-Century Philosopher and Mystic. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Weier, Winfried (1981). ‘Der Okkasionalismus des Johannes Clauberg und sein Verhältnis zu Descartes, Geulincx, Malebranche’, Studia Cartesiana. 2:.Google Scholar
Weimann, Karl-Heinz (1978). ‘Leibniz und die medizinischen Strömungen seiner Zeit’, in Magia Naturalis 1978.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Julius R. (1965). ‘The Concept of Relation: Some Observations on Its History’, in Weinberg, J. R., Abstraction, Relation, and Induction. Three Essays in the History of Thought. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A. (1965a). ‘The Concept of Matter in Fourteenth-century Science’, in McMullin, 1965.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A. (1965b). ‘The Principle Omne quod movetur ab alio movetur in Medieval Physics’, Isis. 56:.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A. (1982). ‘The Interpretation of Aristotle's Physics and the Science of Motion’, in Kenny, Kretzmann, and Pinborg, 1982.Google Scholar
Wells, N. J. (1981). ‘Suarez on the Eternal Truths’, The Modern Schoolman. 58:.Google Scholar
Wells, N. J. (1982). ‘Descartes' Uncreated Truths’, The New Scholasticism. 56:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, H. (1958). Die Naturrechtslehre Samuel Pufendorfs. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wenn, H. (1956). Das Schuldrecht Pufendorfs, diss., Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.Google Scholar
Werner, Karl (1883). ‘Die Cartesisch-Malebranche'sche Philosophie in Italien: M. A. Fardella’, Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Klasse der Kaiserlichen Akademie de Wissenschaften. 102:.Google Scholar
Wernham, A. G. (1965). ‘Liberty and Obligation in Hobbes’, in Brown, K. C. (ed.), Hobbes Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wertz, Spencer, and Linda, (1975). ‘Some Correlations between Swift's Gulliver and Locke on Personal Identity’, Journal of Thought. 10:.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. (1956). ‘Unpublished Boyle Papers Relating to Scientific Method’, Annals of Science. 12:.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. (1958). Science and Religion in Seventeenth-Century England. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. (1962). ‘The Foundations of Newton's Philosophy of Nature’, British Journal for the History of Science. 1:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. (1971a). The Construction of Modern Science: Mechanisms and Mechanics. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. (1971b). Force in Newton's Physics: The Science of Dynamics in the Seventeenth Century. London: Macdonald.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. (1972). ‘Newton and the Hermetic Tradition’, in Debus, 1972, vol. I.
Westfall, Richard S. (1975). ‘The Role of Alchemy in Newton's Career’, in Bonelli, M. L. Rhigini and Shea, William R. (eds.), Reason, Experiment and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution. New York: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. (1980). Never at Rest, A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. (1984). ‘Newton and Alchemy’, in Vickers, 1984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westman, R. S. (1984). ‘Nature, Art and Psyche: Jung, Pauli, and the Kepler-Fludd Polemic’, in Vickers, 1984.Google Scholar
Westman, Robert S., and McGuire, J. E. (1977). Hermeticism and the Scientific Revolution. Papers read at a Clark Library Seminar, March 9 1974. Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Whewell, William (1862). Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
Whichcote, Thomas (1969). The Use of Reason in Matters of Religion, in Patrides, C. A. (ed.), The Cambridge Platonists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitby, Daniel (1684). Ethices compendium in usum academicae juventutis. Oxford.Google Scholar
White, Thomas (1642). De mundo dialogi tres, quibus materia, hoc est, quantitas, numerus, figura, partes, partium qualitas & genera: fonna, hoc est, magnonum corpontm motus, & motuum intentata hactenus philosophis origo: caussae, hoc est, movens, efficiens, gubermans, caussa finalis, durationis quoque principium & terminus: et tandem definitio, rationbus purè à natura depromptis aperiuntur, concluduntur. Paris.Google Scholar
White, Thomas (1646). Institutionum peripateticarum ad mentem … Kenelmi equitis Digbaei pars theorica …Lyon. (Eng. trans, 1656.)Google Scholar
White, Thomas (1651). An Answer to the Lord Faulklands Discourse of Infallibility, in Cary, (1651).Google Scholar
White, Thomas (1656). Peripateticall Institutions in the Way of … Sir Kenelm Digby: The Theoricall Part. London.Google Scholar
White, Thomas (1657). Euclides physicus, sive de principiis naturae stoecheida…. London.Google Scholar
White, Thomas (1658). Euclides metaphysicus, sive de principiis sapientiae…. London.Google Scholar
Whiteside, Derek T. (1977). ‘From His Claw the Greene Lyon’, Isis. 68:.Google Scholar
Whitmore, P. J. S. (1967). The Order of the Minims in Seventeenth-Century France (International Archives of the History of Ideas). The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, P. J. S. (1972). A Seventeenth-Century Exposure of Superstition: Select Texts of Claude Pithoys (1587–1676) (International Archives of the History of Ideas). The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widmaier, Rita (1983). Die Rolle der chinesischen Schrift in Leibniz' Zeichentheorie (Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa 24). Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David (1980). Sameness and Substance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilenius, Reijo (1963). The Social and Political Theory of Francisco Suárez. Helsinki: Societas Philosophicae Fennica.Google Scholar
Wilkins, John (1688). Essay toward a Real Character and Philosophical Language. London.Google Scholar
Wilkins, John (1699). Of the Principles and Duties of Natural Religion. 4th ed. London.Google Scholar
Willems, Alphonse (1880). Les Elzevier. Histoire et annales typographiques. Brussels: G. A. van Trigt.Google Scholar
William, of Ockham (1967–86). Opera theologica (10 vols.). Saint Bonaventure, N.Y.: Saint Bonaventure University.Google Scholar
William, of Ockham (1990). Philosophical Writings, trans, with intro. and notes by Boehner, Philotheus; Latin texts and English trans, revised and new foreword and bibliography by Brown, Stephen F.. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.Google Scholar
William, of Sherwood (1968). Treatise on Syncategorematic Words, trans. Kretzmann, N.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1973). Problems of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1978). Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry. Hassock, Sussex: Harvester.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1983). ‘Descartes' Use of Scepticism’, in Burnyeat, Myles (ed.), The Sceptical Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williams, George H. (1962). The Radical Reformation. Philadelphia: Westminster.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael (1986). ‘Descartes and the Metaphysics of Doubt’, in Rorty, 1986a.Google Scholar
Williams, Penry (1986). ‘Elizabethan Oxford: State, Church, and University’, in McConica, J. K. (ed.), History of the University of Oxford, vol. 3: The Collegiate University. Oxford: Oxford University Press, PP..Google Scholar
Williamson, Arthur H. (1979). Scottish National Consciousness in the Age of James VI: The Apocalypse, the Union and the Shaping of Scotland's National Culture. Edinburgh: John Donald.Google Scholar
Williamson, Arthur H. (1989). ‘The Jewish Dimension of the Scottish Apocalypse: Climate, Covenant and World Renewal’, in Kaplan, Y., Méchoulan, H., and Popkin, R. (eds.), Menasseh ben Israel and His World. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine (1989). Leibniz's Metaphysics: A Historical and Comparative Study. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine (1990). ‘Visual Surface and Visual Symbol: The Microscope and the Occult in Early Modern Science’, in Yolton, John (ed.), Philosophy, Religion and Science in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Library of the History of Ideas). Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret (1976a). ‘Leibniz's Dynamics and Contingency in Nature’, in Machamer, P. K. and Turnbull, R. G. (eds.), Motion and Time, Space and Matter. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret (1976b). ‘Leibniz: Self-Consciousness and Immortality in the Paris Notes and After’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 58:.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret (1978). Descartes (Arguments of the Philosophers). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Margaret (1979). ‘Superadded Properties: The Limits of Mechanism in Locke’, American Philosophical Quarterly. 16:.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret (1980). ‘Objects, Ideas, and “Minds”: Comments on Spinoza's Theory of Mind’, in Kennington, Richard (ed.), The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza (Studies in Philosophy and History of Philosophy 7). Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret (1987). ‘The Phenomenalism of Leibniz and Berkeley’, in Sosa, E. (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of Berkeley. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret (1990). ‘Descartes on the Representationality of Sensation’, in Cover, J. A. and Kulstad, Mark (eds.), Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret (1991). ‘Descartes on the Origin of Sensation’, Philosophical Topics. 19:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Kenneth P. (1989). Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winkler, Kenneth P. (1991). ‘Locke on Personal Identity’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 29:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Alois (1986). ‘Selbstdenken — Antinomien — Schranken. Zum Einfluss des späten Locke auf die Philosophie Kants’, Aufklärung. 1:.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. (1982). ‘Essence and Existence’, in Kretzmann, , Kenny, , and Pinborg, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisan, Winifred L. (1978). ‘Galileo's Scientific Method: A Re-examination’, in Butts, Robert E. and Pitt, Joseph C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Galileo. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Witelo, (1535). Peri optikes, id est de natura, ratione, & proiectione radiorum uisus, luminum, colorum atque formarum, quam uulgo perspectivam vocant, libri X. Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. (1963). Grosse Rechtsdenker der deutschen Geistesgeschichte. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1736). Philosophia Prima, sive Ontologia. Editio Nova. Frankfurt and Leipzig. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1962.)Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1751). Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. Halle and Frankfurt. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1983.)Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1985). Rede über die Praktische Philosophie der Chinesen (Oratio de Sinarum philosophia practica), ed. and trans. (German) Albrecht, Michael. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A. (1929). Crescas' Critique of Aristotle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A. (1934). The Philosophy of Spinoza (2 vols.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wolter, Allan Bernard (1965). ‘The Ockhamist Critique’, in McMullin, 1965.Google Scholar
Wolter, Allan Bernard (1990). The Philosophical Theology of John Duns Scotus. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, D. (1980). ‘Leibniz's Theory of Relations’, Philosophical Review. 89:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Anthony (1813–20). Athenae Oxonienses, ed. Bliss, P. (4 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, C. M. (1986). George Gemistos Plethon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodruff, Paul (1990). ‘Plato's Early Theory of Knowledge’, in Everson, 1990.Google Scholar
Woolhouse, Roger S. (1971). Locke's Philosophy of Science and Knowledge: A Consideration of Some Aspects of An Essay concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woolhouse, Roger S. (1982). ‘The Nature of an Individual Substance’, in Hooker, Michael (ed.), Leibniz: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Woolhouse, Roger S. (1983). Locke (Philosophers in Context). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Woolhouse, Roger S. (1988). The Empiricists (The History of Western Philosophy: 5). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woolhouse, Roger S. (1993). Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz. The Concept of Substance in Seventeenth-Century Metaphysics. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
Wootton, D. (1990). ‘John Locke: Socinian or Natural Law Theorist?’ in Crimmins, J. E. (ed.), Religion, Secularization and Political Thought. Thomas Hobbes to J. S. Mill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Worthington, John (1847–86). The Diary and Correspondence of Dr. John Worthington, ed. Crossley, James (3 vols.), in Remains Historical and Literary Connected with the Palatine Counties of Lancaster and Chester, vols. 13, 36, 64. Manchester.Google Scholar
Wren, Christopher (1750). Parentalia; Or Memoirs of the Family of the Wrens. London.Google Scholar
Wright, John (1983). The Sceptical Realism of David Hume. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Thomas (1604). The Passions of the Minde in Generall. London.Google Scholar
Wright, Thomas (1630). The Passions of the Minde in Generall. London. (Repr. ed. Sloan, T. O., Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1971.)Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A., and Schofield, R. S. (1981). The Population History of England 1541–1871. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wundt, Max (1939). Die deutsche Schulmetaphysik des 17. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances (1964). Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances (1966). The Art of Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances (1968). ‘The Hermetic Tradition in Renaissance Science’, in Singleton, Charles S. (ed.), Art, Science and History in the Renaissance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances (1975). The Rosicrucian Enlightenment. Frogmore: Paladin.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances (1979). The Occult Philosophy in the Elizabethan Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yolton, John W. (1951). ‘Locke's Unpublished Marginal Replies to John Sergeant’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 12:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yolton, John W. (1956). John Locke and the Way of Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yolton, John W. (ed.) (1969). John Locke. Problems and Perspectives. A Collection of New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yolton, John W. (1970). Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yolton, John W. (1971). John Locke and Education. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Yolton, John W. (1975a). ‘Ideas and Knowledge in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy. 13:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yolton, John W. (1975b). ‘On Being Present to the Mind. A Sketch for the History of an Idea’. Dialogue. 14:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yolton, John W. (1983). Thinking Matter. Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Yolton, John W. (1984). Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Yolton, John W. (1985). Locke: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yolton, John W. (ed.) (1990). Philosophy, Religion and Science in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Library of the History of Ideas). Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Yolton, John W. (1991). Locke and French Materialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yost, R. M. (1990). ‘Locke's Rejection of Hypotheses about Sub-microscopic Events’, in Yolton, John (ed.), Philosophy, Religion and Science in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Library of the History of Ideas). Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Young, Robert Fitzgibbon (1971). Comenius in England. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Yovel, Y. (1989). Spinoza and Other Heretics (2 vols.). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zabarella, Jacopo (1586). De naturalis scientiae constitutione. Venice.Google Scholar
Zabarella, Jacopo (1597). Opera Logica. Cologne. (Repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1966.)Google Scholar
Zabarella, Jacopo (1606). Commentarii in Ill. Aristotelis Libros de Anima. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Zabarella, Jacopo (1985). De methodis libri quatuor; Liber de regressu, ed. Vasoli, Cesare. Bologna: CLUEB.Google Scholar
Zagorin, Perez (1992). ‘Cudworth and Hobbes on Is and Ought’, in Kroll, R. et al. (eds.), Philosophy, Science, and Religion in England 1640–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zagorin, Perez (1993). ‘Hobbes's Early Philosophical Development’, Journal of the History of Ideas. 54:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambelli, Paola (1960). ‘A proposito del De vanitate scientiarum et artium di Cornelio Agrippa’, Rivista critica di storia della filosofia. 28:.Google Scholar
Zambelli, Paola (1973a). ‘Il Problema della magia naturale nel Rinascimento’, Rivista critica di storia della filosofia. 15:.Google Scholar
Zambelli, Paola (1973b). ‘Platone, Ficino e la magia’, in Hora, E. and Kessler, E. (eds.), Studia humanitatis: Ernesto Grassi zum 70. Geburtstag. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Zambelli, Paola (1976). ‘Magic and Radical Reformation in Agrippa of Nettesheim’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 39:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambelli, Paola (1978). ‘Aut diabolus aut Achillinus: Fisionomia, astrologia e demonologia nel metodo di un aristotelico’, Rinascimento. 2d ser. 18:.Google Scholar
Zambelli, Paola (1991). L'Ambigua natura della magia: Filosofi, streghe, riti nel rinascimento. Milan: Il Saggiatore.Google Scholar
Zanier, G. (1975). Ricerche sulla diffusione e fortuna del ‘De incantationibus’ di Pomponazzi. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Zanier, G. (1977). La medicina astrologica e la sua teoria: Marsilio Ficino e i suoi critici contemporanei. Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateneo & Bizzarri.Google Scholar
Zarka, Yves-Charles (1988). ‘La matière et la représentation: L'expérience dans la philosophie naturelle de Descartes’, in Méchoulan, Henry (ed.), Problématique et réception du Discours de la méthode et des Essais. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Zeisold, Johannes (1661). De Aristotelis…cum scriptura sacra consensu, ab eaque apparente dissensu tractatus. Jena.Google Scholar
Zilsel, Edgar (1942). ‘The Genesis of the Concept of Physical Law’, Philosophical Review. 51:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimara, Marcantonio (1562). Solutiones contradictionum in dictis Aristotelis, et Averrois super libros Physicorum, in Averroes 1562–74, vol. 4.Google Scholar
Zurbuchen, Simone (1991). Naturrecht und natürliche Religion. Zur Geschichte des Toleranzbegriffs von Samuel Pufendorf bis Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Daniel Garber, University of Chicago, Michael Ayers, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.031
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Daniel Garber, University of Chicago, Michael Ayers, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.031
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Daniel Garber, University of Chicago, Michael Ayers, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521307635.031
Available formats
×