Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:55:16.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

John Cottingham
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access

Summary

Legoito d'an hikanōs ei kata tēn hypokeimenēn hylēn diasaphētheiē. (‘Our discussion will be on the right lines if it illuminates things in a way that is appropriate to the subject-matter in question.’)

Aristotle

The Nature of the Subject

The philosophy of religion has unique attractions. At a time when academic philosophizing has become increasingly fragmented, separated off into a host of specialisms preoccupied with narrow programmes of ‘research’, the philosophical study of religion has a stimulatingly wide purview and necessarily connects us with a whole spectrum of inquiries. It embraces practical moral questions (about how we should live our lives), as well as more theoretical moral issues about the objectivity of morality and the source of moral value; it takes us into the philosophy of mind – questions about the nature of the self and consciousness, and the extent to which we are ultimately responsible for our character and actions; and it delves into cosmological questions about the ultimate source of our world and of human existence. But perhaps most strikingly, it is concerned with our overall view of the nature of reality. Hence, it necessarily resists division into hermetically sealed subdisciplines, and instead keeps alive the traditional grand vision of philosophy as the attempt to achieve a comprehensive ‘synoptic’ vision of things – one that endeavours to discern how (or how far) the different areas of our human understanding fit together.

These grand holistic questions are ones that many contemporary analytic philosophers are wary of; understandably enough, the needs of gaining a doctoral qualification and making one's career in a competitive academic world are apt to lead people to retreat into specialized niches where they can gain a respected expertise in a narrow area. There is surely nothing wrong with this specialisation as such – indeed, it can yield significant scholarly dividends. But for all that, I suspect that many people still retain something of the drive that led them to philosophy in the first place: an urge to deepen their understanding of what meaning, if any, their lives as a whole may have, or what kind of overall vision of reality may be possible. And sooner or later, this quest, the quest that has always been at the heart of the philosophical enterprise, is likely to draw us into the grand questions tackled by philosophy of religion.

Type
Chapter
Information
Philosophy of Religion
Towards a More Humane Approach
, pp. 1 - 24
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics [c. 325 bc], Bk. I, Ch. 3, ed. Irwin, T. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1985)Google Scholar
Cottingham, J., “What Is Humane Philosophy and Why Is It at Risk?”, in O’Hear, A. (ed.), Conceptions of Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise, Pensées (‘Thoughts’) [1670], ed. Lafuma, L. (Paris: Seuil, 1962), no. 418Google Scholar
James, William on ‘forced options’, in The Will to Believe [1896] (Cranston, RI: Anglenook, 2012), §1Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, The Questions concerning Liberty and Necessity and Chance [1654], in English Works of Thomas Hobbes, ed. Molesworth, W. (London: Bohn, 1841)Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian, The Future for Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004), Editor's Introduction, pp. 2–3Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore, Wandering in Darkness (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 24–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGilchrist, Iain, The Master and His Emissary (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), p. 93Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, Love's Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), pp. 281–282Google Scholar
Nussbaum, , Love's Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 268Google Scholar
Louth, Andrew, Discerning the Mystery (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983), p. 37Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony, What I Believe (London: Continuum, 2006), p. 14Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F. (London: Routledge, 1961), §1Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations [Philosophische Untersuchungen, 1953], trans. Anscombe, G. E. M. (New York: Macmillan, 1958), Part I, §23Google Scholar
Cottingham, J., ‘Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Religion’, in Glock, H.-J. and Hyman, J. (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein (Oxford: Wiley, forthcoming)
Phillips, D. Z. (ed.), Religion and Understanding (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967)
Adam, C. and Tannery, P., Œuvres de Descartes, 12 vols., revised ed. (Paris: Vrin/CNRS, 1964–76)Google Scholar
Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D., The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vols. I and II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
‘Journey of the Mind towards God’), in Opera Omnia (Collegium S. Bonaventurae: Quaracchi, 1891)
Putnam, Hilary, ‘Levinas and Judaism’, in Critchley, S. and Bernasconi, R. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Levinas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), pp. 33–70Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel in Ethique et infini [1982], trans. as Ethics and Infinity (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1985), 91ffGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, J., ‘The Desecularization of Descartes’, in Jacobs, Nathan and Firestone, Chris (eds.), The Persistence of the Sacred in Modern Thought (Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 2012), pp. 15–37Google Scholar
Cottingham, J., ‘Sceptical Detachment or Loving Submission to the Good: Reason, Faith and the Passions in Descartes’, Faith and Philosophy, 28:1 (January 2011), 44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascal, Blaise, Pensées [1670], ed. Lafuma, L. (Paris: Seuil, 1962), no. 913.Google Scholar
Wynn, Mark, Emotional Experience and Religious Understanding (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Paul, The Elusive God: Reorienting Religious Epistemology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), p. 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Paul, The Evidence for God (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren, Concluding Unscientific Postscript [Afsluttende Uvidenskabelig Efterskrift, 1846], trans. Swenson, D. F. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1941), p. 182Google Scholar
The Scientific Image (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980), p. 88
Jones, Ward E., ‘Being Moved by a Way the World Is Not’, Synthèse DOI 10.1007/s11229–009–9522-z, published online 9 April 2009
Plantinga, A., ‘Reason and Belief in God’, in Plantinga, A. and Wolterstorff, N. (eds.), Faith and Rationality (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1983), pp. 16–93Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981), pp. 328ffGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions [1962], 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970)Google Scholar
Boghossian, Paul, Fear of Knowledge: against Relativism and Constructivism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Jones, Ward E., ‘Religious Conversion, Self-Deception and Pascal's Wager’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 36:2 (April 1998), 167–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, , Wandering in Darkness (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 165–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, J., Why Believe? (London: Continuum, 2009)Google Scholar
The Spiritual Dimension (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)
Cottingham, J., ‘Human Nature and the Transcendent’, in Sandis, Constantine and Cain, M. J. (eds.), Human Nature. Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement 70 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 233–254Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Method
  • John Cottingham, University of Reading
  • Book: Philosophy of Religion
  • Online publication: 05 September 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094627.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Method
  • John Cottingham, University of Reading
  • Book: Philosophy of Religion
  • Online publication: 05 September 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094627.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Method
  • John Cottingham, University of Reading
  • Book: Philosophy of Religion
  • Online publication: 05 September 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094627.002
Available formats
×