Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Special ResponsibilitiesGlobal Problems and American Power, pp. 264 - 284Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2012
References
www.info.dfat.gov.au/info/historical/HistDocs.nsf/12~266
www.info.dfat.gov.au/info/historical/HistDocs.nsf/10~289
www.acronym.org.uk/27state.htm
Capital rules: The construction of global financeCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 2007Google Scholar
Is there a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities?Philosophical Studies 138 2008 349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
www.acronym.org.uk/acrorep/a13pt1.htm 2011
The practice turn in international relationsCambridgeCambridge University Press
www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2009/speech409.pdf 2011
Global governance of financial systems: The international regulation of systemic riskOxfordOxford University Press 2006Google Scholar
Globalization in retreat: Further geopolitical consequences of the financial crisisForeign Affairs 88 2009 2Google Scholar
The role of the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) in the negotiation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)Natural Resources Forum 23 1999 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The greenhouse development rights framework: The right to development in a climate constrained worldBerlinHeinrich Böll Foundation 2008Google Scholar
Between anarchy and society: Trusteeship and the obligations of powerOxfordOxford University Press 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
www.bis.org/bcbs/history.htm 2011
The NPT Review Conference – Much talk, few resultsBulletin of the Atomic Scientists 36 1980 7Google Scholar
Ecological enlightenment: Essays on the politics of the risk societyAtlantic Highlands, NJHumanities Press 1995Google Scholar
Responsibility to protect: The global effort to end mass atrocitiesCambridgePolity Press 2009Google Scholar
The primacy of politics: Social democracy and the making of Europe’s twentieth centuryCambridgeCambridge University Press 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010
Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governanceReview of International Political Economy 18 2011 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Co-opting cosmopolitanism? The International Monetary Fund’s new global ethicsGlobal Society 20 2006 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The limits of financial risk management: Or, what we didn’t learn from the Asian crisisNew Political Economy 15 2010 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The limits of transparency: Ambiguity and the history of international financeIthaca, NYCornell University Press 2005Google Scholar
The capital myth: The difference between trade in widgets and in dollarsForeign Affairs 77 1998 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/09/14/bouncy_castle_finance 2011
Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth centuryCambridgeCambridge University Press 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A commentaryYale Journal of International Law 18 1993 451Google Scholar
www.reachingcritical 2011
Five to rule them all: The UN Security Council and the making of the modern worldNew YorkOxford University Press 2009Google Scholar
Cumulative CO2 emissions: Shifting international responsibilities for climate debtClimate Policy 8 2008 569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997
Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige pressGlobal Environmental Change 14 2004 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rethinking non-proliferation: LBJ, the Gilpatric Committee and US national security policyJournal of Cold War Studies 8 2006 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Understanding China’s regional rise: Interpretations, identities and implicationsInternational Affairs 85 2009 817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World out of balance: International relations and the challenge of American primacyPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Do great powers have great responsibilities? Great powers and moral agencyGlobal Society 18 2004 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legitimacy and legality in international law: An interactional accountCambridgeCambridge University Press 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Precommitment regimes for intervention: Supplementing the Security CouncilEthics and International Affairs 25 2011 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
On rules, politics, and knowledge: Friedrich Kratochwill, international relations, and domestic affairsNew YorkPalgrave 2010Google Scholar
Legitimacy and power politics: The American and French revolutions in international political culturePrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 2002Google Scholar
Hedley Bull on arms controlLondonMacmillan in association with the International Institute for Strategic Studies 1987Google Scholar
The Anarchical society: A study of order in world politicsLondonMacmillan 1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The great irresponsibles? The United States, the Soviet Union, and world orderInternational Journal 35 1980 437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011
2011
2002
www.gcrio.org/OnLnDoc/pdf/bush_letter010313.pdf 2011
www.nytimes.com/2004/02/11/politics/10WEB-PTEX.html 2011
2003
Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate changeLeiden Journal of International Law 18 2005 747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constituting global leadership: Which countries need to be around the summit table for climate change and energy security?Global Governance 16 2010 21Google Scholar
The twenty years’ crisis, 1919–1939: An introduction to the study of international relationsLondonMacmillan 1939Google Scholar
Norm entrapment and preference change: The evolution of the European Union position on international emissions tradingGlobal Environmental Politics 5 2005 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharing CO2 emission reductions among one billion high emitters: A rule for among all nationsPNAS 106 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cold climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15Environmental Politics 19 2010 637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swords into plowshares: The problems and progress of international organizationLondonUniversity of London Press 1965Google Scholar
The common defense and great-power responsibilitiesPolitical Science Quarterly 101 1986 719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
www.climatenetwork.org/sites/default/files/CAN_FAB_Essentials_1.pdf 2011
www.theclimategroup.org/_assets/files/China-Five-Year-Plan-EXECUTIVE-SUMMARY.pdf 2011
2011
The unfinished peace after World War I: America, Britain and the stabilisation of Europe 1919–1932CambridgeCambridge University Press 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The wisdom of statecraft: Sir Herbert Butterfield and the philosophy of international politicsDurham, NCDuke University Press 1985Google Scholar
Differential treatment in international law: Towards a new paradigm of interstate relationsEuropean Journal of International Law 10 1999 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
www.nti.org/e_research/source_docs/us/department_energy/national_ nuclear_security_administration/10.pdf 2011
America unbound: The Bush revolution in foreign policyWashington, DCBrookings Institution Press 2003Google Scholar
ec.europa.eu/internal_market/finances/docs/de_larosiere_report_en.pdf 2011
Sovereignty as responsibility: Conflict management in AfricaWashington, DCBrookings Institution 1996Google Scholar
Against the grain: The United States and the global climate change regimeGlobal Change, Peace and Security 17 2005 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1947
The myth of the autocratic revival: Why liberal democracy will prevailForeign Affairs 88 2009 77Google Scholar
2010
All politics is global: Explaining international regulatory regimesPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 2008Google Scholar
The impact of the Nuclear Posture Review on the international nuclear nonproliferation regimeNonproliferation Review 9 2002 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate changeEnvironment 50 2008 26Google Scholar
2010
www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1945/450426d.html 2011
Exorbitant privilege: The rise and fall of the dollar and the future of the international monetary systemOxfordOxford University Press 2011Google Scholar
Globalizing capital: A history of the international monetary systemPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 1996Google Scholar
www.unausa.org/Document.Doc?id=246 2011
The European Union as a leader in international multilateral negotiations – A problematic aspiration?International Relations 21 2007 445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The best defense: Counterproliferation and US national securityWashington Quarterly 26 2003 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International justice as equal regard and the use of forceEthics and International Affairs 17 2003 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Failure at the NPT Review ConferenceBulletin of the Atomic Scientists 31 1975 46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Can institutions have responsibilities?: Collective moral agency and international relationsBasingstokePalgrave Macmillan 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Can institutions have responsibilities?: Collective moral agency and international relationsBasingstokePalgrave Macmillan 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010
American hegemony and the global environmentInternational Studies Review 7 2005 585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US–Soviet security cooperation: Achievements failures, lessonsOxfordOxford University Press 1988Google Scholar
Doing and deserving: Essays in the theory of responsibilityPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 1970Google Scholar
1995
2000
2010
The social construction of climate change: Power, knowledge, norms, discourseAldershotAshgate 2007Google Scholar
Debating disarmament: Interpreting Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear WeaponsNonproliferation Review 14 2007 401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collective enforcement of peace and securityAmerican Political Science Review 39 1945 970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The super-powers: The United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union – Their responsibility for peaceNew YorkHarcourt, Brace & Co. 1944Google Scholar
www.foei.org/en/what-we-do/un-climate-talks/global/2009/our-demands-in-copenhagen 2011
www.g20.org/Documents/g20_summit_declaration.pdf 2011
www.g20.org/Documents/pittsburgh_summit_leaders_statement_250909.pdf 2011
www.g20.org/pub_communiques.aspx 2011
www.g20.org/Documents/final-communique.pdf 2011
A perfect moral storm: The ethical tragedy of climate changeNew YorkOxford University Press 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling-dollar diplomacy in current perspective: The origins and the prospects of our international economic orderNew YorkColumbia University Press 1980Google Scholar
The Garnaut review 2011: Australia in the global response to climate changeCambridgeCambridge University Press 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
www.defense.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=1581 2011
Blasts from the past: Proliferation lessons from the 1960sInternational Security 29 2004 100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, dollars, and power: The politics of international monetary relations, 1958–1971Chapel Hill, NCUniversity of North Carolina Press 2004Google Scholar
The gold battles within the Cold War: American monetary policy and the defense of EuropeDiplomatic History 26 2002 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilitiesChicago, ILUniversity of Chicago Press 1985Google Scholar
Vulnerabilities and responsibilities: An ethical defence of the welfare stateAmerican Political Science Review 79 1985 775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floating the system: Germany, the United States, and the breakdown of Bretton Woods, 1969–1973Diplomatic History 31 2007 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Climate cataclysm: The foreign policy and national security implications of climate changeWashington, DCBrookings Institution Press 2008Google Scholar
Climate change and European leadership: A sustainable role for EuropeBoston, MAKluwer Academic Publishers 2000CrossRef
www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2011/speech484.pdf 2011
Central banking as global governance: Constructing financial credibilityCambridgeCambridge University Press 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The discursive demolition of the Asian development modelInternational Studies Quarterly 47 2003 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007
Common but differentiated responsibility: The Kyoto Protocol and United States policyNew York University Environmental Law Journal 7 1999 27Google Scholar
The road not taken: Climate change policy in Canada and the United StatesGlobal Environmental Politics 7 2007 92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Special responsibility and the appeal to costJournal of Political Philosophy 17 2009 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towards a new Bretton Woods? The first G20 leaders summit and the regulation of global financeNew Political Economy 14 2009 275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011
Equity and international climate change negotiations: A matter of perspectiveClimate Policy 7 2007 518Google Scholar
Ozone depletion and climate change: Constructing a global responseAlbany, NYState University of New York Press 2005Google Scholar
Governance without government: Order and change in world politicsCambridgeCambridge University Press 1992Google Scholar
Taming the sovereigns: Institutional change in international politicsCambridgeCambridge University Press 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japan’s international relations: Politics, economics, and securityAbingdonRoutledge 2005Google Scholar
The promise of constructivism in international relations theoryInternational Security 23 1998 170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
www.armscontrol.org/act/2010_01–02/FuelBank 2011
www.china-un.org/eng/gdxw/t606111.htm 2011
Liberal Leviathan: The origins, crisis, and transformation of the American world orderPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 2011Google Scholar
2005
China, India lash out at talk of “carbon tariffsBridges Weekly Trade New Digest 13 2009 ictsd.net/i/news/bridgesweekly/50301/Google Scholar
The responsibility to protect: The report of the International Commission on Intervention and State SovereigntyOttawaInternational Development Research Centre 2001Google Scholar
www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&k=e1&p3=4&case=95 2011
www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/aa/aa01.htm 2011
www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/aa/aa07.htm 2011
The global covenant: Human conduct in a world of statesOxfordOxford University Press 2000Google Scholar
International monetary cooperation since Bretton WoodsNew YorkOxford University Press 1996Google Scholar
2011
Incentives, obligations and enforcement: Does the NPT meet its states parties’ needs?Disarmament Diplomacy 70 2003 3Google Scholar
www.unidir.org/pdf/articles/pdf-art2186.pdf 2011
2011
After the NPT’s indefinite extension: The future of the global nonproliferation regimeNonproliferation Review 3 1995 28Google Scholar
www.theatlantic.com/doc/200905/imf-advice 2011
13 bankers: The Wall Street takeover and the next financial meltdownNew YorkPantheon 2010Google Scholar
www.eurunion.org/eu/2010-News-Releases/JOINT-STATEMENT-BY-UNITED-STATES-TREASURY-SECRETARY-TIMOTHY-GEITHNER-AND-EUROPEAN-UNION-COMMISSIONER-MICHEL-BARNIER-ON-THE-FINANCIAL-REFORM-AGENDA.html 2011
Power and responsibility: Building international order in an era of transnational threatsWashington, DCBrookings Institution 2009Google Scholar
www.gallup.com/poll/145358 2011
2010
Interpreting the Nuclear Non-Proliferation TreatyOxfordOxford University Press 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
China rising: Peace, power, and order in East AsiaNew YorkColumbia University Press 2007Google Scholar
Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytical frameworksInternational Security 27 2003 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International relations theory and the Asia-PacificNew YorkColumbia University Press 2003Google Scholar
Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politicsIthaca, NYCornell University Press 1998Google Scholar
1969
1968
The law of the United Nations: A critical analysis of its fundamental problemsClark, NJThe Lawbook Exchange 2000Google Scholar
After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economyPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 1984Google Scholar
Power and interdependenceBoston, MALittle, Brown 1977
www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2009/12/16/text_of_sen_kerrys_speech_at_cop15 2011
2011
United States hegemony and the foundations of international lawCambridgeCambridge University Press 2003Google Scholar
Making America safe for the world: Multilateralism and the rehabilitation of US authorityGlobal Governance 16 2010 471Google Scholar
2011
www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/12/showdown_copenhagen.html 2011
www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/lin3/English 2011
The problem of harm in world politics: Theoretical investigationsCambridgeCambridge University Press 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The transformation of political community: Ethical foundations of the post-Westphalian eraCambridgePolity Press 1998Google Scholar
Towards a sociology of global morals with an emancipatory intentReview of International Studies 33 2007 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011
The balance of power in international relations: metaphors, myths and modelsCambridgeCambridge University Press 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The UN Security Council: From the cold war to the 21st centuryBoulder, COLynne Rienner 2004Google Scholar
www.majoreconomiesforum.org
Sir Alfred Zimmern revisited: Fifty years onReview of International Studies 12 1986 279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=77369#axzz1TGGuqlhn 2011
Anti-reflexivity: The American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policyTheory, Culture and Society 27 2010 100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate: A Complement or Competitor to the Kyoto Protocol?Global Change, Peace and Security 18 2006 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004
1944
Contraction and convergence: The global solution to climate changeDartingtonGreen Books 2000Google Scholar
2007
2005
Minilateralism: The magic number to get real international actionForeign Policy 173 2009 135Google Scholar
Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key QuestionsWashington, DCNational Academy Press 2001Google Scholar
At Home Abroad: Identity and Power in American Foreign PolicyIthaca, NYCornell University Press 2002Google Scholar
www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/fuelcycle/neff.pdf 2011
www.ens-newswire.com/ens/mar2009/2009–03–30–01.asp 2011
Discord and collaboration: Essays on international politicsBaltimore, MDJohns Hopkins Press 1962Google Scholar
www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=3115 2011
2011
America’s global advantage: US hegemony and international cooperationCambridgeCambridge University Press 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisis on the Korean peninsula: How to deal with a nuclear North KoreaNew YorkMcGraw-Hill 2003Google Scholar
www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/18/obama-in-copenhagen-speec_n_396836.html 2011
www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-un-security-council-summit-nuclear-non-proliferation-and-nuclear- 2011
www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-wall-street-reform 2011
2011
www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-at-UN-Secretary-General-Ban-Ki-moons-Climate-Change-Summit/ 2011
www.enduringamerica.com/april-2009/2009/4/20/video-and-transcript-president-obamas-remarks-at-the-summit.html 2011
The European Union in international climate policy: The prospect for leadershipIntereconomics – Review of European Economic Policy 42 2007 77Google Scholar
2002
Equity norms in global environmental governanceGlobal Environmental Politics 8 2008 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The states system of Europe 1640–1990: Peacemaking and the condition of international stabilityOxfordOxford University Press 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/briefing-note-climate-shame-get-back-to-the-table.pdf 2011
Post-hegemonic climate change?British Journal of Politics and International Relations 11 2009 140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush’s nuclear revolution: A regime change in nonproliferationForeign Affairs 82 2003 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006
II: Political inequality at the Congress of ViennaPolitical Science Quarterly 60 1945 532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011
Revolutions in sovereignty: How ideas shaped modern international relationsPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 2001Google Scholar
2010
Making rules for global finance: Transatlantic regulatory cooperation at the turn of the millenniumInternational Organization 63 2009 665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/17/AR2009111701090.html?sid=ST2009111700768 2011
Nuclear weapons don’t kill people, rogues doInternational Politics 44 2007 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010
The laws of war and the state of the American exceptionReview of International Studies 35 2009 631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politics and international legal obligationEuropean Journal of International Relations 9 2003 591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinventing peace: David Davies, Alfred Zimmern and liberal internationalism in interwar BritainInternational Relations 16 2002 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Transnational governance in global finance: The principles for stable capital flows and fair debt restructuring in emerging marketsInternational Studies Perspectives 11 2010 222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constructing the world polity: Essays on international institutionalizationLondonRoutledge 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic orderInternational Organization 36 1982 379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an institutionInternational Organisation 46 1992 561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A history of the United Nations Charter: The Role of the United States 1940–1945Washington, DCBrookings Institution 1958Google Scholar
The puzzle of trusting relationships in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation TreatyInternational Affairs 86 2010 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009
www.unidir.ch/pdf/articles/pdf-art2189.pdf 2011
www.mcis.soton.ac.uk/PPNN/issue-reviews/ir04.pdf 2011
Multi-level reinforcement: Explaining European Union leadership in climate change mitigationGlobal Environmental Politics 7 2007 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Three grand designs: The USA, Great Britain, and the Gaullist concept of Atlantic partnership and European unityJournal of Transatlantic Studies 3 2005 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: Origin and implementation, 1959–1979LondonOceana 1980Google Scholar
Face reality? After you! – A call for leadership on climate changeEthics and International Affairs 25 2011 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Great powers and outlaw states: Unequal sovereigns in the international legal orderCambridgeCambridge University Press 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The new masters of capital: American bond rating agencies and the politics of creditworthinessIthaca, NYCornell University Press 2005Google Scholar
www.reuters.com/article/2009/11/12/us-apec-idUSTRE5AA0IB20091112 2011
www.reachingcriticalwill.org/legal/npt/prepcom04/mexiconac26.pdf
2010
2010
1964
1968
2010
Common but differentiated responsibilities in international lawAmerican Journal of International Law 98 2004 276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approachesAcademy of Management Review 20 1995 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The nuclear taboo: The United States and the non-use of nuclear weapons since 1945CambridgeCambridge University Press 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banking on Basel: The future of international financial regulationWashington, DCPeterson Institute for International Economics 2008Google Scholar
www.un.org/en/conf/npt/2005/npttreaty.html
http://trumanlibrary.org/publicpapers/viewpapers.php?pid=914 2011
www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=12391 2011
www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/Speeches/2009/0121_at.shtml 2011
www.acronym.org.uk/docs/ 0909/doc03.htm 2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2007
2009
2011
A more secure world: Our shared responsibility: Report of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and ChangeNew YorkUnited Nations 2004Google Scholar
www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=78&articleid=1163 2011
1992
2005
Events leading up to World War II: Chronological history of certain major international events leading up to and during World War II with the ostensible reasons advanced for their occurrence, 1931–1944Washington, DCUS GPO 1944 www.ibiblio.org/pha/events/1933.htmlGoogle Scholar
www.stanford.edu/class/polisci211z/2.6/NPR2001leaked.pdf 2011
www.nationalcenter.org/KyotoSenate.html 2011
secretary.state.gov/www/statements/1998/980219a.html 2011
www.china.org.cn/environment/news/2009–07/16/content_18146470.htm 2011
2004
The transformation of multilateralism mode 1.0 to mode 2.0Global Policy 1 2010 263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1945/450629a.html 2011
Environmental policy: New directions for the twenty-first centuryWashington, DCCongressional Quarterly 2006Google Scholar
Order and violence: Hedley Bull and international relationsOxfordOxford University Press 1990Google Scholar
2002
The European Union in global environmental governance: Leadership in the making?International Environmental Agreements 7 2007 389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Governing finance: East Asia’s adoption of international standardsIthaca, NYCornell University Press 2008Google Scholar
The Congress of Vienna, 1814–15LondonBell 1945
Collective identity formation and the international stateAmerican Political Science Review 88 1994 384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Social theory of international politicsCambridgeCambridge University Press 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saving strangers: Humanitarian intervention in international societyOxfordOxford University Press 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011
www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/national/nss-020920.pdf 2011
www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/press-conference-president-nuclear-security-summit 2011
Some aspects of the covenant of the League of NationsLondonOxford University Press 1934Google Scholar
The realist tradition and the limits of international relationsCambridgeCambridge University Press 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1976
The next nuclear wave: Nonproliferation in a new worldForeign Affairs 84 2005 156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The proposed termination of the Iraq mandateAmerican Journal of International Law 25 1931 436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The international climate change regimes: A guide to rules, institutions and proceduresCambridgeCambridge University Press 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar