Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T01:46:52.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - PREDICATES AND ARGUMENTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Ronnie Cann
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Translating English into a logical language

In this chapter and the next, we will lay the foundations on which a good deal of logical semantics is built. In accordance with the discussion in Chapter 1, we first define a logical language into which sentences of English are translated in order to circumvent the problems of ambiguity and underdeterminacy found in the object language. Having defined the translation language, and specified the procedure for translating simple English sentences into it, our attention will turn to the interpretation of these logical expressions in terms of their truth-conditions, thus providing an indirect interpretation of the corresponding English sentences.

The syntax of LP

Like all languages, natural or artificial, logical languages have a syntax, i.e. a set of rules for constructing composite expressions from simpler ones. The logical language described in this chapter, called LP, contains expressions that fall into one of four logical categories: individuals, predicates, formulae and operators (or connectives). Expressions in each of the first three categories can be further subdivided into two sorts: constants, which have a fixed interpretation, and variables, which do not. These two sorts of expression correspond, roughly, to content words (e.g. table, run, Ethel) and pronominal expressions (e.g. she, they) in natural languages, respectively. This chapter deals only with constants, but variables will become increasingly important in later chapters.

Sentences in natural languages translate into formulae in LP which have the logical category t (as sentences have the syntactic category S).

Type
Chapter
Information
Formal Semantics
An Introduction
, pp. 27 - 53
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • PREDICATES AND ARGUMENTS
  • Ronnie Cann, University of Edinburgh
  • Book: Formal Semantics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166317.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • PREDICATES AND ARGUMENTS
  • Ronnie Cann, University of Edinburgh
  • Book: Formal Semantics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166317.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • PREDICATES AND ARGUMENTS
  • Ronnie Cann, University of Edinburgh
  • Book: Formal Semantics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166317.003
Available formats
×