Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T23:07:04.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Partisan Families
The Social Logic of Bounded Partisanship in Germany and Britain
, pp. 167 - 182
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, Christopher. 1975. “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.” American Political Science Review 69: 1218–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher. 1992. “Social Psychology, Demographic Variables, and Linear Regression: Breaking the Iron Triangle.” Political Behavior 14: 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher. 2002. “Parental Socialization and Rational Party Identification.” Political Behavior 24: 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acock, Alan C., and Vern, L. Bengtson. 1978. “On the Relative Influence of Mothers and Fathers: A Covariance Analysis of Political and Religious Socialization.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 40(3): 519–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, C. Fred. 1994. Group Psychology and Political Theory. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., Silvia, M. Mendes, and Yuliya, V. Tverdova. 2004. “Endogenous Economic Voting: Evidence from the 1997 British Election.” Electoral Studies 20: 1–26.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., and Aida Paskeviciute. 2004. “Macro-Politics and Micro-Behavior: Mainstream Politics and the Frequency of Political Discussion in Contemporary Democracies.” In The Social Logic of Politics, Alan, S. Zuckerman, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 228–50.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1964. Commentary on the Nicomechean Ethics, tr. C. I. Litzinger, O. P. Chicago: Henry Regnery, Library of Living Catholic Thought. II: 855.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1983. Treatise on Happiness. Question 4, Article 8. South Bend Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press: 52.Google Scholar
Aristotle., 1962. Nicomechean Ethics. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, tr. Martin Oswald.Google Scholar
Aron, Art, and Elaine Aron. 2000. “Self-expansion Motivation and Including Other in the Self.” In The Social Psychology of Personal Relationship, William, Ickes and Steve, Duck, eds. New York: Wiley: 109–28.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1986. “Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System.” The Journal of Business 59: S385–S398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, Robert J. 2005. “Consciousness.” Discussion Paper 391, Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, May.
Axelrod, Robert. 1997a. “The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41: 203–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1997b. The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Kendall. 1974. “The Acquisition of Partisanship in Germany.” American Journal of Political Science 18(3): 569–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannon, Declan. 2003. “Market Segmentation and Political Marketing.” Political Science Association Conference, PMG Panel. Lincoln, England.
Bantle, Christian, and John P. Haisken-DeNew. 2002. “Smoke Signals: The Intergenerational Transmission of Smoking Behavior.” German Institute for Economic Research-DIW.
Barker, Ernest, ed. and tr. 1962. The Politics of Aristotle. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartle, John. 1999. “Improving the Measurement of Party Identification.” In British Elections and Parties Review Vol. 9, Justin, Fisher, Philip, Cowley, David, Denver and Andrew, Russell, eds. London: Frank Cass: 119–35.Google Scholar
Bartle, John. 2001. “The Measurement of Party Identification in Britain: Where Do We Stand Now?” In British Elections & Parties Review Vol. 11, Jon, Tonge, Lyn, Bennie, David, Denver and Lisa, Harrison, eds. London: Frank Cass: 1–14.Google Scholar
Bartle, John. 2003. “Focus Groups and Measures of Party Identification: An Exploratory Study.” Electoral Studies 22: 217–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen, Russell, J. Dalton, Steven, Greene, and Robert, Huckfeldt. 2002. “The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media, and Organizational Influences on Presidential Choices.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen, and Kent, M. Jennings. 1975. “Parents as ‘Middlepersons’ in Political Socialization.” Journal of Politics 37(1): 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen, and Kent, M. Jennings. 1991. “Family Traditions, Political Periods, and the Development of Political Orientations.” Journal of Politics 53: 742–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary. 1964. Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. 1985. “Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor.” Journal of Labor Economics 3: S33–S58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard R., Paul, F. Lazarsfeld, and William, N. McPhee. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Knut, and Wolfram Wickert. 1999. “Selected Aspects of Communication in German Election Campaigns.” In Handbook of Political Marketing, Bruce, I. Newman, ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage: 455–84.Google Scholar
Berns, Gregory S., Jonathan, Chappelow, Caroline, F. Zink, Giuseppe, Pagnoni, Megan, E. Martin-Skurski, and Jim, Richards. 2005. “Neurobiological Correlates of Social Conformity and Independence During Mental Rotation.” Biological Psychiatry 58: 245–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beyer, Mary Alice, and Robert, Whitehurst. 1976. “Value Change with Length of Marriage: Some Correlate of Consonance and Dissonance.” International Journal of Marriage and the Family 6: 109–20.Google Scholar
Bion, W. R.Experiences in Groups and Other Papers. 1961. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André. 2000. To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, Elisabeth, Gidengil, Richard, Nadeau, and Neil, Nevitte. 2001. “Measuring Party Identification: Britain, Canada, and the United States.” Political Behavior 23: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottomore, T. B., and Maximilien, Rubel, eds. 1956. Karl Marx: Selected Writings in Sociology and Social Philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Boudon, Raymond. 1992. “Subjective Rationality and the Explanation of Social Behavior.” In Economics, Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution, Herbert, Simon, ed. Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Boudon, Raymond.1998. “Social Mechanisms without Black Boxes.” In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Peter, Hedström and Richard, Swedberg, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brynin, Malcolm, and David, Sanders. 1997. “Party Identification, Political References, and Material Conditions: Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey, 1991–2.” Party Politics 3: 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David E., and Donald, Stokes. 1969. Political Change in Britain: The Evolution of Party Choice. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Butler, David E., and Donald, Stokes. 1974. Political Change in Britain: The Evolution of Electoral Choice. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Philip, E. Converse, Warren., E. Miller, and Donald., E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Phillip, E. Converse, Warren, E. Miller, and Donald, E. Stokes. 1966. Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Dorwin, ed. 1964 [1951]. Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Coile, Courtney C. 2003. Retirement Incentives and Couples' Retirement Decisions. Working Paper 9496; http://www.nber.org/papers/w9496. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass. (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, W. Andrew, and Brett Laursen. 2000. “Adolescent Relationships: The Art of Fugue.” In Close Relationships: A Sourcebook, Clyde, Hendrick and Susan, Hendrick, eds. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications: 59–70.Google Scholar
Collins, W. Andrew, and Brett Laursen.2004. “Parent-Adolescent Relationships and Influences.” In Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, Richard, M. Lerner and Laurence, Steinberg, eds. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley: 331–61.Google Scholar
Coltrane, Scott. 2000. “Research on Household Labor Modeling and Measuring the Social Embeddedness of Routine Family Work.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62(4): 1208–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela J., Donald, D. Searing, and Ivor, M. Crewe. 2002. “The Deliberative Potential of Political Discussion.” British Journal of Political Science 32(1): 21–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent. David, Apter, ed. New York: The Free Press: 206–61.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1969. “Of Time and Partisan Stability.” Comparative Political Studies 2(4): 139–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1976. The Dynamics of Party Support: Cohort-Analyzing Party Identification. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Cooke, Lynn. 2004. “The Gendered Division of Labor and Family Outcomes in Germany.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 66: 1246–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, Ivor. 1980. “Negative Partisanship: Some Preliminary Ideas Using British Data.” Paper prepared for the Planning Session on Problems in Comparative Survey Research in Political Behavior: Issues in Data Collection and Analysis, Joint Sessions of the European Consortium for Political Research, Florence, March.
Cunningham, Michael R., and Anita P. Barbee. 2000. “Social Support.” In Close Relationships: A Sourcebook, Clyde, Hendrick and Susan, S. Hendrick, eds. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage: 273–86.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2000. “The Decline of Party Identifications.” In Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Russell, J. Dalton and Martin, P. Wattenberg, eds. New York: Oxford University Press: 19–36.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Wilhelm Bürklin. 1996. “The Two German Electorates.” In Germans Divided, Russell, Dalton, ed. Oxford: Berg: 183–208.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Wilhelm, Bürklin. 2003. “Wähler als Wandervögel: Dealignment and the German Voter.” German Politics and Society 21: 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Martin, P. Wattenberg, eds. 2000. Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, James C. 1970. “The Family's Role in Political Socialization.” In Learning about Politics, Roberta, S. Sigel, ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
De, Graaf, Nan, Dirk, and Anthony, Heath. 1992. “Husbands' and Wives' Voting Behaviour in Britain: Class-dependent Mutual Influence of Spouses.” Acta Sociologica 35(4): 311–22.Google Scholar
Denver, David, and Gordon Hands. 2002. “Post-Fordism in the Constituencies: The Continuing Development of Constituency Campaigning in Britain.” In Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums, David, M. Farrell and Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, , eds. London and New York: Routledge: 108–26.Google Scholar
Denver, David, Gordon, Hands, Justin, Fisher, and Ian, MacAllister. 2003. “Constituency Campaigning in Britain 1992–2001.” Party Politics 9(5): 541–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denver, David, Gordon Hands, and Simon Henig. 1998. “Triumph of Targeting? Constituency Campaigning in the 1997 Election.” In British Elections and Parties Review VIII, David, Denver, Justin, Fisher, Philip, Cowley, and Charles, Pattie, eds. London: Cass: 171–90.Google Scholar
Denver, David, Gordon, Hands, and Ian, MacAllister. 2004. “The Electoral Impact of Constituency Campaigning in Britain.” Political Studies 52: 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Gregory Andrade. 2001. “Implications of a Latitude-Theory Model of Citizen Attitudes for Political Campaigning, Debate, and Representation.” In Citizen Politics: Perspectives from Political Psychology, James, H. Kuklinski, ed. New York: Cambridge University Press: 289–312.Google Scholar
Dogan, Mattei. 1967. “Political Cleavage and Social Stratification in France and Italy.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, Seymour, M. Lipset and Stein, Rokkan, eds. New York: The Free Press: 129–96.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary, and Steven, Ney. 1998. Missing Persons: A Critique of Personhood in the Social Sciences. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1966 [1933]. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press, tr. George Simpson.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1967. Political Parties. New York: Wiley, tr. Robert C. North.Google Scholar
Easton, David, and Jack, Dennis. 1976. Children and the Political System: Origins of Political Legitimacy. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Edlund, Lena, Rohini, Pander, and Lailer, Haider. 2005. “Unmarried Parenthood and Redistributive Politics.” The Journal of the European Economic Association 3: 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jan. 1998. “A Plea for Mechanisms.” In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Peter, Hedström and Richard, Swedberg, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press: 45–73.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 2004. “Macro vs. Micro-Level Perspectives on Economic Voting: Is the Micro-Level Evidence Endogenously Induced?” Political Methodology Meetings, Stanford University, July.
Erikson, Robert S., Michael, B. MacKuen, and James, A. Stimson. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz. 1962. Class and Party in the Eisenhower Years: Class Roles and Perspectives in the 1952 and 1956 Elections. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz. 1980. “The Columbia Studies of Personal Influence.” Social Science History 4: 207–28.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz. 1986. Politics, Self, and Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Euromonitor International Web site: http://www.euromonitor.com/Marketing_to_children.
Eurostat. 2003. Time Use at Different Stages of Life: Results from 13 Countries. Luxembourg: Office of Publications of the European Communities.
European Communities.2004. How Europeans Spend Their Time: Everyday Life of Women and Men. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Evans, Geoffrey, ed. 1999a. The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey.1999b. “Class Voting: From Obituary to Appraisal.” In The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context, Geoffrey, Evans, ed. New York: Oxford University Press: 1–20.Google Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey.1999c. “Class and Vote: Disrupting the Orthodoxy.” In The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context, Geoffrey Evans, ed. New York: Oxford University Press: 323–4.
Evans, Geoffrey, and Robert Andersen. 2001. “Endogenizing the Economy: Political Preferences and Economic Perceptions Across the Electoral Cycle.” CREST Working Paper 88. Available on http://www.crest.ox.ac.uk.
Falter, J., H. Schoen, and C. Caballero. 2000. “Zur Validierung des Konzepts ‘Parteiidentifikation’ in der Bundesrepublik.” In 50 Jahre empirische Wahlforschung in Deutschland. Entwicklung, Befunde, Perspektiven, Daten, Klein, M., Jagodzinski, W., Mochmann, E., and Ohr., D. Wiesbaden, eds. Westdeutscher Verlag: 235–71. [“On the Validity of the Concept of Party Identification in the Federal Republic.”]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, David M., and Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, . 2002. Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. 1993. “Reexamining the ‘Minimal Effects’ Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 55(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., and Peter, R. Schrott. 1995. “Campaign Effects on Voter Choice in the German Election of 1990.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 349–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 2002. “Parties and Partisanship: A 40-Year Retrospective.” Political Behavior 24: 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Kimberly, Andrew McCulloch, and Jonathan Gershuny. 1999. British Fathers and Children: A Report for Channel 4 “Dispatches.” Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ. Available on http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk.
Fowler, James H. 2005. “Turnout in a Small World.” In The Social Logic of Politics, Alan, S. Zuckerman, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 269–88.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark N., Tom, Mackie, and Henry, Valen. 1992. Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, Anne H., Timothy, Smeeding, and Frank, F. Furstenberg Jr. 2004. “Do We Invest Less Time in Children? Trends in Parental Time in Selected Industrialized Countries since the 1960s.” Population and Development Review. 30(4): 579–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Reinhard, Selten, eds. 2001a. Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Reinhard Selten. 2001b. “Rethinking Rationality.” In Bounded Rationality: the Adaptive Toolbox, Gerd, Gigerenzer and Reinhard, Selten, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press: 1–12.Google Scholar
Gimpel, James, and J. Celeste Lay. 2005. “Partisan Identification, Local Partisan Contexts, and the Acquisition of Participatory Attitudes.” In The Social Logic of Politics, Alan, S. Zuckerman, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 209–28.Google Scholar
Glaser, William A. 1959–60. “The Family and Voting Turnout.” Public Opinion Quarterly 23(4): 563–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluchowski, P. M., and U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff. 1998. “The Erosion of Social Cleavages in Western Germany, 1971–97.” In Stability and Change in German Elections: How Electorates Merge, Converge, or Collide, Christopher, J. Anderson and Carsten, Zelle, eds. Westport, Conn.: Praeger: 13–32.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John H. 1999a. “Modeling the Pattern of Class Voting in British Elections: 1964–1992.” In The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context,”Geoffrey, Evans, ed. New York: Oxford University Press: 59–82.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John H. 1999b. “Critical Commentary: Four Perspectives on the End of Class Politics.” In The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context,”Geoffrey, Evans, ed. New York: Oxford University Press: 318–22.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Richard, and Dale Griffin. 2000. “On the Statistics of Interdependence: Treating Dyadic Data with Respect.” In The Social Psychology of Personal Relationships, William, Ickes and Steve, Duck, eds. New York: Wiley: 181–213.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Mark. 2003. “In the Midst of Fellows: The Social Context of the American Turnout Decision.” Paper prepared for and presented at the Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 28–3.
Green, Donald, Bradley, Palmquist, and Eric, Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Steven. 2002. “The Social-Psychological Measurement of Partisanship.” Political Behavior 24: 171–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. H. 1997. Econometric Analysis, 3rd ed. upper Saddle River, N.J.Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Greenstein, Fred I. 1965. Children and Politics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. Alexander, Craig McCarty, and John C. Turner. 1996. “Salient Group Memberships and Persuasion: The Role of Social Identity in the Validation of Beliefs.” In What's Social About Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups, Judith, L. Nye and Aaron, Brower, eds. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage: 29–58.Google Scholar
Hays, Bernadette C., and Clive, S. Bean. 1992. “The Impact of Spousal Characteristics on Political Attitudes in Australia.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 524–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 45: 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James J., and Thomas, E. Macurdy. 1985. “A Simultaneous Equations Linear Probability Model.” Canadian Journal of Economics 18(1): 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James J., and James, N. Snyder Jr. 1997. “Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators.” Rand Journal of Economics 28: 142–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heineman, Elizabeth D. 1999. What Difference Does a Husband Make: Women and Marital Status in Nazi and Postwar Germany. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hendrick, Clyde, and Susan, S. Hendrick, eds. 2000. Close Relationships: A Handbook. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Hernes, Gunnar. 1998. “Virtual Reality.” In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Peter, Hedström and Richard, Swedberg, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press: 74–101.Google Scholar
Hess, Robert D., and Judith, V. Torney. 1968. The Development of Political Attitudes in Children. Anchor Books; Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M., and Scott, D. McClurg. 2005. “The Mobilization of Core Supporters: Campaigns, Turnout and Electoral Composition in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 49(4): 689–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Robert T., and John, Turner. 1968. Political Parties in Action. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Holzhacker, Ronald D. 1999. “Campaign Communication and Strategic Responses to Change in the Electoral Environment.” Party Politics 5(4): 439–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Beck, Paul Allen, Russell, J. Dalton, and Jeffrey, Levine. 1995. “Political Environments, Cohesive Social Groups, and the Communication of Public Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 39(4): 1025–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Paul, E. Johnson, and John, Sprague. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Paul E. Johnson, and John Sprague. 2005. “Individuals, Dyads, and Networks: Autoregressive Patterns of Political Influence.” In The Social Logic of Politics, Alan, S. Zuckerman, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 21–50.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and John, Sprague. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie. 2003. “Group Identity and Political Cohesion.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, David, O. Sears, Leonie, Huddy and Robert, Jervis, eds. New York: Oxford University Press: 511–58.Google Scholar
Huston, Ted L., John, P. Caughlin, and Robert, Houts. 2000. “How Does Personality Matter in Marriage? An Examination of Trait Anxiety, Negativity, and Marital Satisfaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 326–36.Google Scholar
Hyman, Herbert. 1959. Political Socialization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ickes, William, and Steve, Duck, eds. 2000. The Social Psychology of Personal Relationships. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Frances Rosenbluth. 2003. “The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap.” Paper presented to the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 28–31.
Jaros, Dean. 1973. Socialization to Politics. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Richard, G. Niemi. 1968. “The Transmission of Political Values from Parent to Child.” American Political Science Review 62: 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Richard, G. Niemi. 1981. Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and their Parents. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joesch, Jutta M., and Katharina, C. Spiess. 2002. “European Mothers' Time with Children: Differences and Similarities across Nine Countries.” Paper prepared for the IZA and CIM Workshop, The Future of Family and Work: Evaluation of Family Friendly Policies. IZA, Bonn and CIM, Aarhus. Bonn. May 10–12. Available on http://www.oza.prg/en/papers/iza_cim_joesch_spiess.pdf.Google Scholar
Johnson, Paul E., and Robert Huckfeldt. 2005. “Agent-Based Explanations for the Survival of Disagreement in Social Networks.” In The Social Logic of Politics, Alan, S. Zuckerman, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Richard W., and Melissa, M. Favreault. 2001. Retiring Together or Working Alone: The Impact of Spousal Employment and Disability on Retirement Decisions. Center for Retirement Education at Boston College. Available on http://www.bc.edu/crr.Google Scholar
Johnston, Ron J. 1999. “Context, Conversation and Conviction: Social Networks and Voting at the 1997 British General Election.” Political Studies 47: 877–89.Google Scholar
Johnston, Ron J., and Charles Pattie. 2005. “Putting Voters in their Places: Local Context and Voting in England and Wales.” In The Social Logic of Politics, Alan, S. Zuckerman, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 184–208.Google Scholar
Johnston, Ron J., Rebecca, Sarker, Kelvyn, Jones, Anne, Bolster, Carol, Propper, and Simon, Burgess. 2005. “Egocentric Economic Voting and Changes in Party Choice: Great Britain 1992–2001.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties 15: 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan. 2001. Politics and the Architecture of Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kaase, Max. 1989. “Mass Participation.” In Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, Kent, M. Jennings et al., eds. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter: 23–66.Google Scholar
Katz, Elihu, and Paul, F. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 1986. “Working Class Formation: Constructing Cases and Comparisons.” In Working-Class Formation: Nineteenth Century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States, Ira, Katznelson and Aristide, Zolberg, eds. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press: 3–44.Google Scholar
Kenny, Christopher B. 1994. “The Microenvironment of Attitude Change.” Journal of Politics 56(3): 715–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr., with Milton, C. Cummings Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality and Presidential Voting 1936–60. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O., Jr., and Frank Munger. 1959. “Social Determinism and Electoral Decision: The Case of Indiana.” In American Voting Behavior, Eugene, Burdick and Arthur, Brodbeck, eds. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press: 281–99.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, Donald R. 1983. Macro-economics and Micro-politics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King-Cassas, Brooks, Damon, Tomlin, Cedric, Anen, Colin, Camerer, Steven, R. Quartz, and Read, P. Montague. 2005. “Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange.” Science 308: 78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, Paul William, and Steven, E. Finkel. 1987. “Is There a Marriage Gap in Politics?Journal of Marriage and the Family 49(1): 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen. 1992. “Civic Norms, Social Sanctions, and Voter Turnout.” Rationality and Society 4: 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen. 1994. “Does Rain Help the Republicans? Theory and Evidence on Turnout and the Vote.” Public Choice 79(1–2): 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knickmeyer, Rebecca, Simon, Baron-Cohen, Peter, Ragatt, and Kevin, Taylor. 2005. “Foetal Testosterone, Social Relationships, and Restricted Interests in Children.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 46(2): 198–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohler, Ulrich. 2002. Der demokratische Klassenkampf. Zum Zusammenhang von Sozialstruktur und Parteipräferenz. Frankfurt a.M and New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Kohler, Ulrich. 2005. “Changing Class Locations and Partisanship in Germany.” In The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, Alan, S. Zuckerman, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 117–32.Google Scholar
Kotler-Berkowitz, Laurence. 2001. “Religion and Voting Behaviour in Great Britain: A Reassessment.” British Journal of Political Science 31: 523–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotler-Berkowitz, Laurence. 2005. “Friends and Politics: Linking Diverse Friendship Networks and Political Participation.” In The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, Alan, S. Zuckerman, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 152–70.Google Scholar
Kroh, Martin, and Peter Selb. 2005. “Partisanship Inheritance: Blindfolding the Next Generation.” Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research.
Kroh, Martin, and Spiess, M., 2004. Documentation of Sample Sizes and Panel Attrition in the German Socio Economic Panel (SOEP) 1984–2004. Berlin: DIW Data Documention 6.Google Scholar
Laland, Kevin M. 2001. “Imitation, Social Learning, and Preparedness as Mechanisms of Bounded Rationality.” In Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox, Gerd, Gigerenzer and Reinhard, Selten, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press: 233–48.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert E. 1959. Political Life: Why People Get Involved in Politics. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 2003. “Models of Decision Making.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, David, O. Sears, Leonie, Huddy, and Robert, Jervis, eds. New York: Oxford University Press: 19–59.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard, Berelson, and Hazel, Gaudet. 1968 [1948]. The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign, 3rd edition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lemann, Nicholas. 2003. “The Controller: Karl Rove's Plans to Take Over Politics.” New Yorker May 12: 68–83.Google Scholar
Levi, Primo. 1988. The Drowned and the Saved. London: Abacus, tr. Raymond Rosenthal.Google Scholar
Levine, Jeffrey. 2005. “Choosing Alone? The Social Network Basis of Modern Political Choice.” In The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, Alan, S. Zuckerman, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 132–51.Google Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. 1948. Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers in Group Dynamics. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark Irving. 1996. The Rebel's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark Irving. 1997. The Cooperator's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Ann Chih. 2005. “Networks, Gender, and the Use of State Authority: Evidence from a Study of Arab Immigrants in Detroit.” In The Social Logic of Politics, Alan, S. Zuckerman, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 171–84.Google Scholar
Long, Scott J. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and Matthew McCubbins. 2000. “The Institutional Foundations of Political Competence: How Citizens Learn What They Need to Know.” In Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, Arthur, Lupia, Matthew, D. McCubbins, and Samuel, L. Popkin, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press: 47–66.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Stuart Elaine, Olla, Listhaug, and George, Rabinowitz. 1991. “Issues and Party Support in Multiparty Systems.” American Political Science Review 85: 1107–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macy, Michael W. 1998. “Social Order and Emergent Rationality.” In What Is Social Theory? The Philosophical Debates, Alan, Sica, ed. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell: 219–37.Google Scholar
Maimonides, . 1963. The Guide of the Perplexed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, tr. Shlomo Pines.Google Scholar
Maimonides, . 1972. Mishne Torah. The Book of Knowledge. Laws of Beliefs. 6:1. Jerusalem: Hotzaat Makor (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Manski, Charles. 1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” Review of Economic Studies 60: 532–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G. 1953–4. “Husband and Wife Interaction over Political Issues.” Public Opinion Quarterly 17: 4, 461–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G., with Chip, Heath. 1994. A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Markman, Arthur B., and Douglas, L. Medin. 2002. “Decision Making.” In Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley. Available on http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/shep/articles/pas0210/sect1. Web site posting: July 15, 2002.Google Scholar
Mebane, Walter, Jr. 2004. “Cuing and Coordination in American Politics.” Prepared for delivery at 2004 Political Methodology Summer Meeting, Stanford, Calif., July 29–31.
Meehl, Paul E. 1977. “The Selfish Voter Paradox and the Thrown-Away Vote Argument.” American Political Science Review 71: 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menand, Louis. 2004. “The Unpolitical Animal: How Political Scientists Understand Voters.” The New Yorker. August 30: 96.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press. Revised and enlarged edition.Google Scholar
Miller, Harvey J. 2004. “Tobler's First Law and Spatial Analysis.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94(2): 284–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Robert L., Rick, Wilford, and Freda, Donoghue. 1999. “Personal Dynamics as Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly 52(2): 269–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Merrill, J. Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MORI Research Report. 2004. The Captain's First Mate. Available on http://www.chumento.co.uk/infospace.
Mosca, Gaetano. 1939. The Ruling Class: Elementi di Scienza Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill. Edited and revised by Arthur, Livingson and translated by Hannah D. Kahn.Google Scholar
Müller, Wilhelm. 1999. “Class Cleavages in Party Preferences in Germany-Old and New.” In The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context, Geoffrey, Evans, ed. New York: Oxford: 137–80.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 1998. Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana C., and Jeffrey, Mondak. 1997. “Dimensions of Sociotropic Behavior: Group-Based Judgments of Fairness and Well-Being.” American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 284–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomb, Theodore M., Ralph, H. Turner, and Philip, E. Converse. 1964. Social Psychology: The Study of Human Interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Roman, Hedges,and Kent, M. Jennings. 1977. “The Similarity of Husbands' and Wives' Political Views.” American Politics Quarterly 5(2): 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard G.,and Kent, M. Jennings. 1991. “Issues and Inheritance in the Formation of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 35(4): 970–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut. 1984. “The Making of a More Partisan Electorate in Germany.” British Journal of Political Science 14(1): 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Judith L., and Aaron, M. Brower. 1996. What's Social about Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oygard, Lisbet, Knut-Inge, Klepp, Grethe, S. Tell, and Odd, D. Vellar. 1995. “Parental and Peer Influences on Smoking among Young Adults: Ten-Year Follow-up of the Oslo Youth Study Participants.” Addiction 90(4): 561–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyserman, Daphna, and Martin J. Packer. 1996. “Social Cognition and Self-Concept: A Socially Contextualized Model of Identity.” In What's Social About Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups, Judith, L. Nye and Aaron, Brower, eds. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications: 175–204.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Robert, Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Geraint, George, Moyser, and Neil, Day. 1992. Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, Charles J., and Ron, J. Johnston. 1999. “Context, Conversation and Conviction: Social Networks and Voting in the 1992 British General Election.” Political Studies 47: 877–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, Charles J., and Ron, J. Johnston. 2000. “People Who Talk Together Vote Together: An Exploration of the Neighbourhood Effect in Great Britain.” Annals, Association of American Geographers 90: 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, Charles J., and Ron, J. Johnston. 2001. “Talk as a Political Context: Conversation and Electoral Change in the British Elections, 1992–97.” Electoral Studies 20(1): 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, Charles, Patrick, Seyd, and Paul, Whiteley. 2004. Citizenship in Britain: Values, Participation and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersson, Olof, Anders, Westholm, and Goran, Blomberg. 1989. Medborganas Makt. Stockholm: Carlssons.Google Scholar
Pienta, Amy M. 2003. “Partners in Marriage: An Analysis of Husbands' and Wives' Retirement Behavior.” The Journal of Applied Gerontology 22(3): 340–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plassner, Fritz, Christian Scheucher, and Christian Senft. 1999. “Is There a European Style of Political Marketing? A Survey of Political Managers and Consultants.” In Handbook of Political Marketing, Bruce, I. Newman, ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications: 90–112.Google Scholar
Powdthavee, Nattavudh. 2005. “For Better and for Worse? A Direct Evidence for Utility Interdependence in Marriage.” Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Manuscript.
Rabinowitz, George, and Macdonald, Stuart Elaine. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 83: 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Bradley M. 1991. “European Party Loyalties Revisited.” American Political Science Review 85: 751–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riesman, David. 1961 [1951]. The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. “The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76: 753–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rilling, James K., David, Gutman, Thorsten, R. Zeh, Giuseppe, Pagnoni, Gregory, S. Berns, and Clinton, D. Kilts. 2002. “A Neural Basis for Social Cooperation.” Neuron 35: 395–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, W. S. 1957. “The Statistical Measurement of Agreement.” American Sociological Review 22(1): 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacerdote, Bruce. 2000. Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7469, Cambridge, Mass. Available on http://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/7469/html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, David, and Malcolm, Brynin. 1999. “The Dynamics of Party Preference Change in Britain,” Political Studies 47: 219–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 2004. “Not Your Parents' Political Socialization: Introduction for a New Generation.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, James D., and Margaret, Dalton. 2001. “Does Parental Disapproval of Smoking Prevent Adolescents From Becoming Established Smokers?Pediatrics 108(6): 1256–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saris, Willem E., and Paul, Sniderman, eds. 2004. Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Särlvick, Bo, and Ivor, Crewe. 1983. Decade of Dealignment: The Conservative Victory of 1979 and Electoral Trends in the 1970s. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Anne E. 2003. “An Estimator for Some Binary-Outcome Selection Models Without Exclusion Restrictions.” Political Analysis 11: 111–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sayer, Liana C., Suzanne, M. Bianchi, and John, P. Robinson. 2004. “Are Parents Investing Less in Children? Trends in Mothers' and Fathers' Time with Children.” American Journal of Sociology 110(1): 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, Liana C., Anne, H. Gauthier, and Frank, F. Furstenberg. 2004. “Educational Differences in Parents' Time with Children: Cross-National Variations.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 66: 1149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Stanley, and Michael, Gazzaniga, eds. 1989. Extending Psychological Frontiers: Selected Works of Leon Festinger. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric, and Green, Donald Philip. 1997. “The Stability of Party Identification in Western Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 30(4): 450–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Herman, and Soren Holmberg. 1995. “Political Parties in Decline?” In Citizens and the State: A Changing Relationship?Dieter, Fuchs and Hans-Dieter, Klingemann, eds. New York: Oxford University Press: 95–133.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Karl. 1998. “The Social Bases of Voting Behavior in Unified Germany.” In Stability and Change in German Elections: How Electorates Merge, Converge, or Collide, Christopher., J. Anderson and Carsten, Zelle, eds. Westport, Conn.: Praeger: 33–54.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger. 2003. “Mass Communication, Personal Communication and Vote Choice: The Filter Hypothesis of Media Influence in Comparative Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 33: 233–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt-Beck, 2006. Rüdiger. “New Modes of Campaigning.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, Russell, J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter, Klingemann, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, and David M. Farrell. 2002. “Studying Political Campaigns and their Effects.” In Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums, David, M. Farrell and Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, , eds. London and New York: Routledge: 1–21.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Stefan, Weick, and Bernhard, Christoph. 2006. “Shaky Attachments: Individual-Level Stability and Change of Partisanship among West German Voters, 1984–2001.” European Journal of Political Research 45: 581–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis. 2003. “The Psychologies Underlying Political Psychology.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, David, O. Sears, Leonnie, Huddy, and Robert, Jervis, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Selten, Reinhard. 2001. “What Is Bounded Rationality?” In Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox,Gerd, Gigerenzer and Reinhard, Selten, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press: 13–36.Google Scholar
Shafir, Eldar, and Robyn, LeBoeuf. 2002. “Rationality.” American Review of Psychology 53: 491–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafir, Eldar, and Amos Tversky. 1995. “Decision Making.” In An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Second Edition (Volume 3: Thinking), Smith, E. E. and Osherson, D. N., eds. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press: 77–100.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward A. 1951. “The Study of the Primary Group.” In The Policy Sciences, Daniel, Lerner and Harold, D. Lasswell, eds. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press: 44–69.Google Scholar
Shively, W. Phillips. 1977. “Information Costs and the Partisan Life Cycle.” 83rd Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
Simmel, Georg. 1955. Conflict and the Web of Group-Affiliations. New York: The Free Press, tr. Kurt H. Wolf and Reinhard Bendix.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1965 [1957]. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A.1999. “Comments on Remarks of James Buchanan and Douglass C. North.” In Competition and Cooperation: Conversations with Nobelists on Economics and Politics, James, Alt, Margaret, Levi, and Elinor, Ostrom, eds. New York: Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Sinnott, Richard. 1998. “Party Attachment in Europe: Methodological Critique and Substantive Interpretations.” British Journal of Political Science 28: 627–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smetana, Judith. 2005. “Editor's Notes.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development Summer: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alison J. 2004. “Who Cares? Fathers and the Time They Spend Looking After Children.” Nuffield College, University of Oxford, June 10.
Sniderman, Paul M. 2000. “Taking Sides: a Fixed Choice Theory of Political Reasoning.” In Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, Arthur, Lupia, Matthew, D. McCubbins, and Samuel, L. Popkin, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press: 67–84.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Richard, A. Brody, and Philip, E. Tetlock. 1991. Reasoning and Choice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and John Bullock. 2004. “A Consistency Theory of Public Opinion and Political Choice: The Hypothesis of Menu Dependence.” In Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error and Change, William, E. Sarris and Paul, M. Sniderman, eds. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press: 337–58.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Laurence. 2001. “We Know Some Things: Adolescent-Parent Relationships in Retrospect and Prospect.” Journal of Research on Adolescence 11: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Laurence. 2005. “Psychological Control: Style or Substance.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development Summer: 71–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinberg, Laurence, and Jennifer S. Silk. 2002. “Parenting Adolescents.” In Handbook of Parenting, Bornstein, M. H., ed. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum: 103–34.Google Scholar
Stoker, Laura,and Kent, M. Jennings. 1995. “Life Cycle Transitions and Political Participation: The Case of Marriage.” The American Political Science Review 89(2): 421–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, Laura, and M. Kent Jennings.2005. “Political Similarity and Influence between Husbands and Wives.” In The Social Logic of Politics, Alan, S. Zuckerman, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 51–74.Google Scholar
Straits, Bruce C. 1990. “The Social-Context of Voter Turnout.” Public Opinion Quarterly 54(1): 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straits, Bruce C. 1991. “Bringing Strong Ties Back In: Interpersonal Gateways to Political Information and Influence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 55(3): 432–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, Charles H. 2003. “Information Processing and Public Opinion.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, David, O. Sears, Leonnie, Huddy, and Robert, Jervis, eds. New York: Oxford University Press: 433–76.Google Scholar
Tedin, Kent L. 1974. “The Influence of Parents on the Political Attitudes of Adolescents.” American Political Science Review 68: 1579–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E., and Jennifer S. Lerner, 1999. “The Social Contingency Model: Identifying Empirical and Normative Boundary Conditions on the Error-and-Bias Portrait of Human Nature.” In Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, Shelly, Chaiken and Yaakov, Trope, eds. New York: Guilford Press: 571–85.Google Scholar
Tinsley, Howard E. A., and David, J. Weiss. 2000. “Interrater Reliability and Agreement.” In Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling. New York: Academic Press: 96–125.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis De. 1969 [1858]. Democracy in America. Mayer, J. P., ed. New York: Doubleday-Anchor, tr. George Lawrence.Google Scholar
Ullmann-Margalit, Edna. 2005. “Big Decisions: Opting, Converting, Drifting.” Center for the Study of Rationality. Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Discussion Paper #409, November.Google Scholar
Ullmann-Margalit, Edna, and Sidney, Morgenbesser. 1977. “Picking and Choosing.” Social Research 44: 757–85.Google Scholar
Van Deth, Jan W. 1989. “Interest in Politics.” In Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, Kent, M. Jennings., eds. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter: 275–312.Google Scholar
Ventura, Raphael, 2001. “Family Political Socialization in Multiparty Systems.” Comparative Political Studies 34(6): 666–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney. 1961. Small Groups and Political Behavior: A Study of Leadership. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Kay, Schlozman, and Henry, Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Kay Schlozman, and Nancy Burns. 2005. “Family Ties: Understanding the Intergenerational Transmission of Political Participation.” In The Social Logic of Politics, ed. Alan, S. Zuckerman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 95–116.Google Scholar
Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2004. Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weakliem, David L., and Anthony Heath. 1999. “The Secret Life of Class Voting: Britain, France, and the United States since the 1930s.” In The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context, Geoffrey, Evans, ed. New York: Oxford University Press: 97–133.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978 [1922]. Economy and Society. Gunter, Roth and Claus, Wittich, eds. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Westholm, Anders. 1991. The Political Heritage: Testing Theories of Political Socialization. Ph.D. dissertation, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Westholm, Anders. 1999. “The Perceptual Pathway: Tracing the Mechanisms of Political Value Transfer Across Generations.” Political Psychology 20: 525–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, Paul, and Patrick Seyd. 1998. “Labour's Grassroots Campaign in 1997.” In British Elections and Elections Review VIII, David, Denver, Justin, Fisher, Philip, Cowley, and Charles, Pattie, eds. London: Cass: 191–207.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul, and Patrick, Seyd. 2003. “Party Election Campaigning in Britain: The Labour Party.” Party Politics 9(5): 637–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wielhouwer, Peter W. 2003. “In Search of Lincoln's Perfect List: Targeting in Grassroots Campaigns.” American Politics Research 31(6): 632–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Sven E. 2002. “The Health Capital of Families: An Investigation of the Inter-spousal Correlation of Health Status Correlation.” Social Science and Medicine 55: 1157–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winkelmann, Rainer. 2000. Econometric Analysis of Count Data. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2003. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Cincinatti, Oh.: South-Western College Publishing.Google Scholar
Zelle, Carsten. 1998. “A Third Face of Dealignment? An Update on Party Identification in Germany 1971–94.” In Stability and Change in German Elections: How Electorates Merge, Converge or Collide, Christopher, J. Anderson and Carsten, Zelle, eds. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan S. 1991. Doing Political Science: An Introduction to Political Analysis. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan S., ed. 2005a. The Social Logic of Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan S.2005b. “Returning to the Social Logic of Politics.” In The Social Logic of Politics, Alan, S. Zuckerman, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 3–20.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan S., Jennifer Fitzgerald and Josip Davić. 2005. “Do Couples Support the Same Political Parties? Sometimes: Evidence from British and German Household Panel Surveys.” In The Social Logic of Politics, Alan S. Zuckerman, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press: 75–94.
Zuckerman, Alan S., and Laurence, A. Kotler-Berkowitz. 1998. “Politics and Society: Political Diversity and Uniformity in Households as a Theoretical Puzzle.” Comparative Political Studies 31(4): 464–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan S., LaurenceA. Kotler-Berkowitz, A. Kotler-Berkowitz, and Lucas, A Swaine. 1998. “Anchoring Political Preferences: The Importance of Social and Political Contexts and Networks in Britain.” European Journal of Political Research 33(3): 285–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan S., and Martin, Kroh. 2006. “The Social Logic of Bounded Partisanship in Germany: A Comparison of West Germans, East Germans, and Immigrants.” Comparative European Politics 4(1): 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan S., Nicholas, A. Valentino, and Ezra, W. Zuckerman. 1994. “A Structural Theory of Vote Choice: Social and Political Networks and Electoral Flows in Britain and the United States.” Journal of Politics 56(4): 1008–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×