Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T01:57:55.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Foot and ankle structured oral questions

from Section 2 - Adult Elective Orthopaedics and Spine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

Paul A. Banaszkiewicz
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Deiary F. Kader
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Get access

Summary

Structured oral examination question 1: Lateral ligament instability of the ankle

  1. EXAMINER. Tell me what this diagram represents and name the structures labelled 2, 3 and 5. (Figure 4.1.)

  2. CANDIDATE. This diagram is a representation of the lateral aspect of the ankle showingthe bony and ligamentous structures. Structure 2 is the anterior talofibular ligament, structure 3 is the calcaneofibular ligament and structure 5 is the posterior distal tibiofibular ligament.

  3. EXAMINER. What structures are injured in a lateral ligament injury?

  4. CANDIDATE. The mechanism is usually a rotational injury with sequential failure of the ligaments from front to back, hence the anterior talofibular ligament or ATFL is most commonly injured followed by the calcaneofibular ligament or CFL and the posterior talofibular ligament is the least frequently injured.

  5. EXAMINER. How would you go about diagnosing a lateral ligament injury to the ankle?

  6. CANDIDATE. In the acute setting I would expect the patient to give a history of an episode of a twisting incident resulting in significant pain and swelling. There may be a history of recurrent sprains and instability. Acutely the lateral side of the ankle would be swollen and tender anterior and inferior to the tip of the fibula but discomfort may make it difficult to elicit a definite sign ofinstability.

  7. In a patient with a more chronic history the clinical sign of instability would be a positive anterior drawertest or talar tilt test.

  8. EXAMINER. Tell me more about those two tests.

  9. CANDIDATE. The patient is examined sitting with their legs over the edge of the couch or sitting in a chair to relax the gastrocnemius soleus complex. For the anterior drawer test the distal tibia is grasped in one hand and the other hand grasps the heel and the foot is drawn anteriorly in relation to the talus. Pain or excess anterior translation or a sulcus sign developing at the anterolateral corner of the ankle are signs of an ATFL injury. The other ankle must be examined for comparison. The talar tilt test involves inversion of the ankle whist palpating the anterolateral corner of the joint to feel for movement of the talus within the mortise. A lack of firm end point or tilt in excess of the normal side would represent instability and the CFL is considered to have been injured if this test is positive.

  10. . . .

Type
Chapter
Information
Postgraduate Orthopaedics
Viva Guide for the FRCS (Tr & Orth) Examination
, pp. 55 - 68
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Maffulli, NFerran, NA.Management of acute and chronic ankle instabilityJ Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008 16 608CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easley, MEAdams, SBHembree, WCCurrent concepts review: results of total ankle arthroplastyJ Bone Joint Surg Am 2011 93 1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courville, XFHecht, PJTosteson, ANA.Is total ankle arthroplasty a cost-effective alternative to ankle fusion?Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011 469 1721CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gougoulias, NKhanna, AMaffulli, N.How successful are current ankle replacements? A systematic review of the literatureClin Orthop Relat Res 2010 468 199CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saltzman, CLMann, RAAhrens, JEProspective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial resultsFoot Ankle Int 2009 30 579CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, LBCougllin, MTHansen, SOsteoarthritis of the ankle: the role of arthroplastyJ Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008 16 249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeng, JCampbell, J.Current concepts review: the rheumatoid forefootFoot Ankle Int 2008 29 959CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trieb, K.Management of the foot in rheumatoid arthritisJ Bone Joint Surg Br 2005 87-B 1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Younger, ASEHansen, STAdult cavus footJ Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005 13 302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwend, RMDrennan, JC.Cavus foot deformity in childrenJ Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003 11 201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddad, SLMyerson, MSYounger, ASymposium: adult acquired flatfoot deformityFoot Ankle Int 2011 32 95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deland, JT.Adult-acquired flatfoot deformityJ Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008 16 399CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coughlin, MJJones, CP.Hallux valgus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessmentFoot Ankle Int 2007 28 759CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easley, METrnka, H-JCurrent concepts review: hallux valgus. Part 1: Pathomechanics, clinical assessment and nonoperative managementFoot Ankle Int 2007 28 654CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easley, METrnka, H-J.Current concepts review: hallux valgus. Part II: Operative treatmentFoot Ankle Int 2007 28 748CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, AHNLimbers, JP.Modern concepts in the treatment of hallux valgusJ Bone Joint Surg Br 2005 87 1038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yee, GLau, J.Current concepts review: hallux rigidusFoot Ankle Int 2008 29 637CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coughlin, MJShurnas, PSHallux rigidus: surgical techniques (cheilectomy and arthrodesis)J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughlin, MJShurnas, PSHallux rigidus: grading and long-term results of operative treatmentJ Bone Joint Surg Am 2003 85 2072CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×