Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- List of Tables
- Preface
- 1 Real Algebraic Curves
- 2 General Ground Fields
- 3 Polynomial Algebra
- 4 Affine Equivalence
- 5 Affine Conics
- 6 Singularities of Affine Curves
- 7 Tangents to Affine Curves
- 8 Rational Affine Curves
- 9 Projective Algebraic Curves
- 10 Singularities of Projective Curves
- 11 Projective Equivalence
- 12 Projective Tangents
- 13 Flexes
- 14 Intersections of Projective Curves
- 15 Projective Cubics
- 16 Linear Systems
- 17 The Group Structure on a Cubic
- 18 Rational Projective Curves
- Index
Preface
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- List of Tables
- Preface
- 1 Real Algebraic Curves
- 2 General Ground Fields
- 3 Polynomial Algebra
- 4 Affine Equivalence
- 5 Affine Conics
- 6 Singularities of Affine Curves
- 7 Tangents to Affine Curves
- 8 Rational Affine Curves
- 9 Projective Algebraic Curves
- 10 Singularities of Projective Curves
- 11 Projective Equivalence
- 12 Projective Tangents
- 13 Flexes
- 14 Intersections of Projective Curves
- 15 Projective Cubics
- 16 Linear Systems
- 17 The Group Structure on a Cubic
- 18 Rational Projective Curves
- Index
Summary
For some time I have felt there is a good case for raising the profile of undergraduate geometry. The case can be argued on academic grounds alone. Geometry represents a way of thinking within mathematics, quite distinct from algebra and analysis, and so offers a fresh perspective on the subject. It can also be argued on purely practical grounds. My experience is that there is a measure of concern in various practical disciplines where geometry plays a substantial role (engineering science for instance) that their students no longer receive a basic geometric training. And thirdly, it can be argued on psychological grounds. Few would deny that substantial areas of mathematics fail to excite student interest: yet there are many students attracted to geometry by its sheer visual content. The decline in undergraduate geometry is a bit of a mystery. It probably has something to do with the fashion for formalism which seemed to permeate mathematics some decades ago. But things are changing. The enormous progress made in studying non-linear phenomena by geometrical methods has certainly revived interest in geometry. And for material reasons, tertiary institutions are ever more conscious of the need to offer their students more attractive courses.
General Background
I first became involved in the teaching of geometry about twenty years ago, when my department introduced an optional second year course on the geometry of plane curves, partly to redress the imbalance in the teaching of the subject.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Elementary Geometry of Algebraic CurvesAn Undergraduate Introduction, pp. xiii - xviPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1998