Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T22:33:33.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Women's Election to Office in the Fifty States

Opportunities and Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Kira Sanbonmatsu
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Susan J. Carroll
Affiliation:
Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
Richard L. Fox
Affiliation:
Loyola Marymount University, California
Get access

Summary

During presidential election years, all eyes are focused on the top of the ticket. Congressional races attract attention, too, especially in years in which control of Congress could shift. In contrast, state elections are typically carried out with far less fanfare and attention from voters and the media. However, state elections deserve their turn in the spotlight.

State governments are critical to American politics and public policy. The fifty states are often at the forefront of policy innovations, earning them status as “laboratories” for testing out new ideas. For example, the national Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) was influenced by state policies, and today some state family leave and maternity leave policies are more generous than the national policy. Meanwhile, a state's experiences can provide warning to Congress and other states about policy directions that should be avoided.

Voters can influence policy choices through state elections. Who runs, wins, and serves matters because state policies are consequential, affecting people’s daily lives. The decisions that states make today can have effects over the long run, putting a state on a particular trajectory and foreclosing alternatives. Governors and state legislative leaders can also be agenda setters and opinion leaders in their states. Moreover, today’s state legislators and statewide officials are tomorrow’s candidates for governor, Congress, and president.

Type
Chapter
Information
Gender and Elections
Shaping the Future of American Politics
, pp. 265 - 288
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, Anya E.. 2001. The Moderation Dilemma: Legislative Coalitions and the Politics of Family and Medical Leave. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh PressGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira, Carroll, Susan J., and Walsh, Debbie. 2009. Poised to Run: Women's Pathways to the State Legislatures. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers UniversityGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncrief, Gary F., Squire, Peverill, and Jewell, Malcolm Edwin. 2001. Who Runs for the Legislature?Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan J.. 2004. Women in State Government: Historical Overview and Current Trends. Book of the States 2004. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments, 396Google Scholar
Darcy, R., Welch, Susan, and Clark, Janet. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation, 2nd ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska PressGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda and Williamson, Vanessa. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, Laurel. 2012. The Partisan Gap Among Women State Legislators. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 33: 65–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gender, Race, and Descriptive Representation in the United States: Findings from the Gender and Multicultural Leadership Project. Journal of Women Politics & Policy 28: 7–41; Carroll and Sanbonmatsu, 2013Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. Revised Edition. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennings, Valerie. 2011. Civic Selves: Gender, Candidate Training Programs, and Envisioning Political Participation. Ph.D. dissertation. University of WisconsinGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. State Elections: Where Do Women Run? Where Do Women Win? In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of Gender and American Politics, ed. Carroll, Susan and Fox, Richard. New York: Cambridge University Press, 189–214Google Scholar
Norrander, Barbara and Wilcox, Clyde. 1998. The Geography of Gender Power: Women in State Legislatures. In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. New York:Oxford University Press, 103–117Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2001. The “Gender Gap” in State Legislative Representation: New Data to Tackle an Old Question. Political Research Quarterly 54: 143–160Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Do Parties Know that “Women Win”? Party Leader Beliefs about Women's Electoral Chances. Politics & Gender 2: 431–450Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37: 119–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice. American Journal of Political Science 46: 20–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill and Moncrief, Gary F.. 2010. State Legislatures Today: Politics Under the Domes. Boston: Longman PublishersGoogle Scholar
Niven, David. 1998. Party Elites and Women Candidates: The Shape of Bias. Women and Politics 19(2): 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office. Political Research Quarterly 46: 503–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly. 2012. Campaigns as Gendered Institutions: Stereotypes and Strategy in Statewide Races. Ph. D. dissertation. Rutgers UniversityGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L. and Oxley, Zoe M.. 2005. Does Running with a Woman Help? Evidence from U.S. Gubernatorial Elections. Politics & Gender 1: 525–546Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L. and Oxley, Zoe M.. 2003. Gender Stereotyping in State Executive Elections: Candidate Selection and Success. Journal of Politics 65: 833–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windett, Jason Harold. 2011. State Effects and the Emergence and Success of Female Gubernatorial Candidates. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 11: 460–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, Tracy L., 2012, on the role of party in state legislative behavior. How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Gender, and Representation in the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, Brian. 1997. Financing the Campaigns of Women Candidates and their Opponents: Evidence from Three States, 1982–1990. Women & Politics 19: 81–97Google Scholar
Hogan, Robert E. 2007. The Effects of Candidate Gender on Campaign Spending in State Legislative Elections. Social Science Quarterly 88: 1092–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, Timothy and Mayer, Kenneth R.. 2007. Public Election Funding, Competition, and Candidate Gender. PS: Political Science and Politics 40: 661–667Google Scholar
Thompson, Joel A., Moncrief, Gary F., and Hamm, Keith E.. 1998. Gender, Candidate Attributes, and Campaign Contributions. In Campaign Finance in State Legislative Elections, ed. Thompson, Joel A. and Moncrief, Gary F.. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 117–138Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira and Dolan, Kathleen. 2009. Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Gender Balance in Government. American Politics Research. 37: 409–428Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2010. The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates. Political Behavior 32: 69–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×