Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T07:44:12.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Immunology, including testing and management of allergy during pregnancy

from Section 4 - Medical conditions in pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Gareth Kitchen
Affiliation:
Specialty Trainee in Anaesthesis, North Western Deanery, Manchester, UK
Tomaz Garcez
Affiliation:
Central Manchester University Hospitals
Nigel J. N. Harper
Affiliation:
Central Manchester University
Kirsty MacLennan
Affiliation:
Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust
Kate O'Brien
Affiliation:
Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust
W. Ross Macnab
Affiliation:
Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter focuses on allergic diseases and their relevance to obstetric anaesthesia, with practical advice on management. Ideally, parturients with suspected allergic disease should be assessed prior to pregnancy, in order to identify relevant allergens and to confirm a management plan. Parturients with a history suggestive of adverse drug reaction require further investigation to identify the cause or to exclude allergy. A previous perioperative or peripartum adverse event necessitates review of those anaesthetic and medical records. If a patient has experienced a serious adverse reaction, their notes should be clearly marked with drug allergy information and a hazard-warning bracelet advised.

Pregnancy presents other immunological challenges to the mother and semiallograft fetus. For the pregnancy to succeed, local and systemic immunological changes are required, including reduction in cytotoxic adaptive immunity and enhancement of regulation. The systemic impact of the immunological changes is not clear, but there is an increased risk of atopic and autoimmune dermatoses in pregnancy. There is no clear evidence to suggest that general atopic diseases are affected.

Autoimmune diseases can have a significant impact on pregnancy, particularly when autoantibodies directed against phospholipids, SS-A or SS-B are present. Antiphospholipid syndrome is associated with increased risk of pregnancy morbidity and loss. The presence of antibodies directed against SS-A and/or SS-B is associated with neonatal lupus and congenital heart block. The effect of pregnancy on the course of autoimmune diseases is more variable, with both improvement and deterioration reported without consistency.

Immunodeficiency syndromes may also present challenges in pregnancy. Patients with antibody deficiency syndromes will have increased requirements of immunoglobulin replacement in the third trimester of pregnancy due to active transplacental transfer of immunoglobulin G. Patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) may improve, remain stable or deteriorate during pregnancy and should receive prophylactic treatment before any instrumental delivery or surgical procedure. Increased vigilance through pregnancy and during delivery is therefore advised for most patients with pre-existent immunologically mediated diseases.

Allergens relevant to anaesthesia

A perioperative allergic reaction is often attributed to drugs, chlorhexidine or latex exposure.

Taking a clinical history for drug allergy

Type I hypersensitivity (IgE-mediated) is often considered to be true allergy. See Table 23.1.

Many patients report allergy to medications: 10% of hospital inpatients self-report penicillin allergy; 90% of patients self-reporting penicillin allergy are able to tolerate penicillin on challenge without adverse reaction (see Box 23.1 and Figure 23.1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (2009). AAGBI Safety Guideline: Suspected anaphylactic reactions associated with anaesthesia. http://www.aagbi.org/sites/default/files/anaphylaxis_2009.pdf (accessed May 2015).
Bhole, M. V., Manson, A. L., Seneviratne, S. L. and Misbah, S. A. (2012). IgE-mediated allergy to local anaesthetics: separating fact from perception: a UK perspective. Br. J. Anaesth. 1, 108, 903–911.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, K., Gonzales, J., Jesurun, C. A., Ambat, M. T. and Mandal-Chaudhuri, S. (2008). Anaphylactic shock in pregnancy: a case study and review of the literature. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth., 17, 350–357.Google Scholar
Gompels, M. M., Lock, R. J., Abinun, M. et al. (2005). C1 inhibitor deficiency: consensus document. Clin. Exp. Immunol., 139(3), 379–394. Erratum: 141: 189–190.Google Scholar
Kar, S., Krishnan, A., Preetha, K. and Mohankar, A. (2012). A review of antihistamines used during pregnancy. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother., 3: 105–108.Google Scholar
Lundstrøm, L. H., Møller, A. M., Rosenstock, C. et al. and the Danish Anaesthesia Database (2009). Avoidance of neuromuscular blocking agents may increase the risk of difficult tracheal intubation: a cohort study of 103,812 consecutive adult patients recorded in the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Br. J. Anaesth., 103, 283–290.Google Scholar
Nakonechna, A., Dore, P., Dixon, T. et al. (2012). Immediate hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine is increasingly recognised in the United Kingdom. Allergol. Immunopathol. (Madr.), 42, 44–49.Google Scholar
O'Connor, K. (2010). Labour complicated by a history of exercise induced anaphylaxis. BJA out of the blue. http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/forum/topic/brjana_el%3B5485 (accessed May 2015).
Soar, J., Pumphrey, R., Cant, A. et al.; Working Group of the Resuscitation Council (UK). (2008). Emergency treatment of anaphylactic reactions-Guidelines for healthcare providers. Resuscitation., 77(2), 157–169.Google Scholar
Sørensen, M. K., Bretlau, C., Gätke, M. R., Sørensen, A.M. and Rasmussen, L. S. (2012). Rapid sequence induction and intubation with rocuronium-sugammadex compared with succinylcholine: a randomized trial. Br. J. Anaesth., 108, 682–689.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×