Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T20:12:55.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - Dostoevsky's journalism and fiction

from PART II - LITERATURE, JOURNALISM, AND LANGUAGES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2015

Ellen Chances
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Deborah A. Martinsen
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Olga Maiorova
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

Introducing the book Literary Journals in Imperial Russia, Robert Maguire noted “that the rise of the novel […] coincided with the rise of the thick journal” and commented on the need “to study the ways in which these various verbal genres interact and shape each other.” Thick journals* had broad-ranging sections that spoke to “a variety of intellectual, cultural, and literary interests,” and “a more or less discernible ideology”; they were also the basic forum in which all nineteenth-century Russian novels were published serially. Dostoevsky not only wrote fiction that was published in thick journals; he also edited and wrote for a number of them. With his brother Mikhail, he created, edited, and contributed to the thick journal Vremya (Time, 1861–3). After Time was closed by the censors, he opened it under another name, Epokha (Epoch, 1864–5). In the 1870s, he edited and wrote columns for the journal Grazhdanin (The Citizen, 1873–4); and then created his own monthly monojournal, Dnevnik pisatelya (Diary of a Writer, 1876–7; one issue in 1880; one in 1881). This essay will examine perspectives on Dostoevsky's journalism; continuity and lack of continuity in his journalism; fictional reflections of ideas expressed in his journalism; and his journalism's influence on the shape of his fiction.

Perspectives on Dostoevsky's journalism

There are many different ways to approach Dostoevsky's journalism. One can focus on its separate phases. Like Robert Belknap, one can explore Dostoevsky's broad use of materials, including journalism, for the creation of his final novel. Following my example, one can examine the evolution of Dostoevsky's ideas in the 1860s journals and observe some connections to his literary works. Like Vera Nechaeva, Wayne Dowler, and Sarah Hudspith, one can situate his 1860s ideas within the ongoing polemics of the radicals, who advocated a change of political regime, and the Slavophiles*, who envisioned Russia's return to its native institutions. Like Joseph Frank, one can discuss all of Dostoevsky's journalistic and fictional ventures and focus on the importance of feuilletons. Like Kate Holland, one can explore Dostoevsky's 1870s journalism within the context of Russian societal and cultural tendencies of the time. Like Deborah Martinsen, one can look at rhetoric and confession in Diary of a Writer. Like Gary Saul Morson, one can look at the Diary as a separate literary work, that is, journalism as literature, and as linked to The Brothers Karamazov (1879–80).

Type
Chapter
Information
Dostoevsky in Context , pp. 272 - 279
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belknap, Robert L. The Genesis of “The Brothers Karamazov”: The Aesthetics, Ideology, and Psychology of Making a Text. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1990.
Chances, Ellen. “Pochvennichestvo: Ideology in Dostoevsky's Periodicals.” Mosaic 7:2 (1974), 71–88.Google Scholar
Chances, Ellen. “Pochvennichestvo: Evolution of an Ideology.” Modern Fiction Studies 20:4 (1974–5), 543–51.Google Scholar
Chances, Ellen. “Literary Criticism and the Ideology of Pochvennichestvo in Dostoevsky's Thick Journals, Vremia and Epokha,Russian Review 34:2 (1975), 151–64.Google Scholar
Chances, Ellen. “Aleksandr Miliukov's Svetoch and Dostoevskii's Vremia: A Case of Recycled Ideas?Slavic Review 43:4 (1984), 588–603.Google Scholar
Chances, Ellen. “Dostoevsky's Notes from Underground Revisted, Plus a Few Thoughts about Winnie-the-Pooh.” In Martinsen, Deborah, Popkin, Cathy, and Reyfman, Irina (eds.), Teaching Nineteenth-Century Russian Literature: Essays in Honor of Robert L. Belknap. Boston: Academic Studies Press, 2014. 186–98.
Dowler, Wayne. Dostoevsky, Grigor'ev, and Native Soil Conservatism. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1982.
Frank, Joseph. See “Indispensable Reading.”
Holland, Kate. The Novel in the Age of Disintegration: Dostoevsky and the Problem of Genre in the 1870s. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2013.
Hudspith, Sarah. Dostoevsky and the Idea of Russianness: A New Perspective on Unity and Brotherhood. London: Routledge Curzon, 2004.
Martinsen, Deborah A. “Dostoevsky's Diary of a Writer: Journal of the 1870s.” In Martinsen, Deborah A. (ed.), Literary Journals in Imperial Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. 155–68.
Morson, Gary Saul. The Boundaries of Genre: Dostoevsky's “Diary of a Writer” and the Traditions of Literary Utopia. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1981; rpt. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1988.
Morson, Gary Saul. “Introductory Study: Dostoevsky's Great Experiment.” In Dostoevsky, F., A Writer's Diary, 2 vols. Trans., notes by Lantz, Kenneth. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1993–4. 1–117.
Todd, William Mills III. “Dostoevsky as a Professional Writer.” In Leatherbarrow, William J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Dostoevsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 66–92.
Todd, William Mills III. “Dostoevsky and Tolstoy: The Professionalization of Literature and Serialized Fiction.” Dostoevsky Studies 15 (2011), 29–36.Google Scholar
Vassena, Raffaella. Reawakening Russian Identity: Dostoevsky's “Diary of a Writer” and its Impact on Russian Society. Bern: Peter Lang, 2007.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×