Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T15:38:02.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

13 - The external dimension of the internal energy market

Bart Van Vooren  and
Ramses A. Wessel
Bart Van Vooren
Affiliation:
ALTIUS, Brussels
Ramses A. Wessel
Affiliation:
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Central issues

  • Collaboration in the energy sector goes back to the ECSC, yet to this day no full-blown EU external energy policy exists. In this chapter we first examine the development of the EU internal energy market, focusing on how an external dimension has recently started to develop to serve EU internal needs.

  • Substantive dimension: the Lisbon Treaty had the purpose of strengthening coherence in EU external relations, and expressly conferred an energy competence onto the EU (Article 194 TFEU). This chapter examines policy coherence in EU external energy policy from the substantive, institutional and vertical dimensions. Here the focus lies on the relationship between energy diplomacy, security of supply and the law-based market-orientated approach. The chapter queries whether the new competence will permit a more integrated approach between different objectives of EU energy policy.

  • In the current setting, there is disagreement on the respective roles of the HR and the EEAS; and the Commission and the Energy Commissioner. These bodies have different perspectives on what EU external energy policy is about, with significant impact on the external dimension of the internal energy market. The strengthened role of the EP in EU external energy policy is also to be taken into account.

  • The progressive advancement of the internal energy market has suffered from a limited political recognition by the Member States that there was the need for a fully fledged external dimension. This is due to the continued priority of Member State national interests over the common EU interest, leading to a significant lack of Member State compliance with Union law on the path to completing the internal market. Similar processes can be observed in the external dimension of the internal energy market, and this chapter therefore pays significant attention to the duty of cooperation as it has been formalized in a legally binding instrument at the end of 2012.

    • Type
    Chapter
    Information
    EU External Relations Law
    Text, Cases and Materials
     , pp. 438 - 474
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press
    Print publication year: 2014

    Access options

    Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

    References

    Aalto, P., The EU–Russian Energy Dialogue (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
    Andoura, S., Hancher, L. and Van der Woude, M., Towards a European Energy Community: A Policy Proposal [Policy Proposal by Jacques Delors] (Brussels: Notre Europe, 2010, No. 76).Google Scholar
    Birchfield, V. L. and Duffield, J. S. (eds.), Toward a Common European Union Energy Policy: Problems, Progress, and Prospects (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Blockmans, S. and Van Vooren, B., ‘Revitalizing the European Neighbourhood Economic Community, The Case for Legally Binding Sectoral Multilateralism’ (2012) 17 European Foreign Affairs Review 577–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Braun, J. F., EU Energy Policy under the Treaty of Lisbon Rules – Between a New Policy and Business as Usual (CEPS Working Paper No. 31, 2011).Google Scholar
    Eikeland, P., ‘EU Internal Energy Market Policy: Achievements and Hurdles’, in Birchfield, V. L. and Duffield, J. S. (eds.), Toward a Common European Union Energy Policy: Problems, Progress, and Prospects (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), pp. 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Haghighi, S., Energy Security: The External Legal Relations of the European Union with Major Oil and Gas Supplying Countries (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar
    Karova, R., Energy Community for South East Europe: Rationale and Implementation to Date (EUI–RSCAS Working Papers 2009/12).Google Scholar
    Leonard, M. and Popescu, N., A Power Audit of EU–Russia Relations (European Council on Foreign Relations, November 2007).Google Scholar
    McGowan, F., ‘Can the European Union’s Market Liberalism Ensure Energy Security in a Time of “Economic Nationalism”?’ (2008) 4 Journal of Contemporary European Research 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Monar, J., ‘The Rejection of the EU–US SWIFT Interim Agreement by the European Parliament: A Historic Vote and its Implications’ (2010) 15 European Foreign Affairs Review 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Riley, A., ‘Editorial – EU Energy Liberalisation: Coming to a Member State Near You!’ (2008) 4 Competition Law Review, 2, 73–75.Google Scholar
    Taylor, S. ‘Safety-First Approach to European Energy Policy’, European Voice, 23–29 June 2011.Google Scholar
    Van der Meulen, E., ‘EU Energy Policy: The Conflict between an Internal Liberalisation Agenda and External Security of Supply’, in Stolte, C., Buruma, T., Runhardt, R. and Smits, F. (eds.), The Future of the European Union (Leiden: Sidestone Press, 2008).Google Scholar
    Van Elsuwege, P., Towards a Modernisation of EU–Russia Legal Relations? (CEURUS EU–Russia Papers, No. 5, 2012).Google Scholar
    Van Vooren, B., ‘EU Energy Policy and the European Neighbourhood Policy: Added-Value or Emulating its Deficiencies?’, in A. Delgado Casteleiro and M. Spernbauer (eds.), Security in EU External Relations (EUI Law Working Paper 2009/1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Van Vooren, B., EU External Relations Law and the European Neighbourhood Policy: A Paradigm for Coherence (Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Van Vooren, B., Europe Unplugged: Progress, Potential and Limitations of EU External Energy Policy Three Years post-Lisbon (SIEPS Working Paper 2012:5).Google Scholar
    Wouters, J., Sterckx, S. and De Jong, S., ‘The 2009 Russian–Ukrainian Gas Dispute: Lessons for European Energy Crisis Management after Lisbon’ (2010) 15 European Foreign Affairs Review 511–538.Google Scholar
    Youngs, R., Energy Security – Europe’s New Foreign Policy Challenge (New York: Routledge, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Youngs, R., Europe’s External Energy Policy: Between Geopolitics and the Market (CEPS Working Document 2007/278).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Commission Communication, Energy 2020, A strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy, Brussels, 10 November 2010, COM(2010) 639 final, p. 4Google Scholar
    Communication Memorandum, First Guidelines for a Community Energy Policy, 18 December 1968 COM(68) 1040 finalGoogle Scholar
    Commission Communication, The internal market for energy, 2 May 1988 COM 88 (238) finalGoogle Scholar
    Commission Communication, An Energy Policy for Europe, 10 January 2007 Google Scholar
    Commission Communication, Inquiry Pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003 into the European Gas and Electricity Sectors, Brussels, 10 January 2006 COM(851) finalGoogle Scholar
    Council Conclusions, Energy 2020: A strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy, Brussels, 28 February 2011, p. 6Google Scholar
    Commission Communication, On security of energy supply and international cooperation – ‘The EU Energy Policy: Engaging with Partners beyond our Borders’, Brussels, 7 September 2011, COM(2011) 539 finalGoogle Scholar
    Commission Communication, An Energy Policy for Europe, 10 January 2007, Brussels, COM(2007) 1 final, p. 3Google Scholar
    Commission Communication, An Energy Policy for Europe, 10 January 2007, Brussels, COM(2007) 1 final, p. 5Google Scholar
    Commission Communication, An Energy Policy for Europe, 10 January 2007, Brussels, COM(2007) 1 final, p. 3Google Scholar
    McGowan, F., ‘Can the European Union’s Market Liberalism Ensure Energy Security in a Time of “Economic Nationalism”?’ (2008) 4 Journal of Contemporary European Research 90–106 at 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Braun, J. F., EU Energy Policy under the Treaty of Lisbon Rules – Between a New Policy and Business as Usual (CEPS Working Paper No. 31, 2011), pp. 4–5Google Scholar
    ESS, A Secure Europe in a Better World, Brussels, 12 December 2003, p. 4 Google Scholar
    Commission Communication, External energy relations – from principles to action, Brussels, 12 October 2006, COM(2006) 590 finalGoogle Scholar
    Commission Communication, An Energy Policy for Europe, Brussels, 10 January 2007, COM(2007) 1 finalGoogle Scholar
    Commission Communication, Second Strategic Energy Review, An EU Energy Security and Solidarity Action Plan, Brussels, 13 November 2008, COM(2008) 781 finalGoogle Scholar
    Commission Communication, Energy 2020, A strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy, Brussels, 10 November 2010, COM(2010) 639 finalGoogle Scholar
    Council Conclusions, On strengthening the external dimension of the EU energy policy, Brussels, 24 November 2011 Google Scholar
    Green Paper, A European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy, 8 March 2006, Brussels, COM(2006) 105 final, p. 14 Google Scholar
    Commission and the Secretary-General/High Representative to the European Council, Joint Paper ‘An external policy to serve Europe’s energy interests’, Brussels, 30 May 2006 Google Scholar
    Commission Communication, External energy relations – from principles to action, Brussels, 12 October 2006, COM(2006) 590 finalGoogle Scholar
    Commission Staff Working Document, The January 2009 Gas Supply Disruption to the EU: An Assessment, Brussels, 16 July 2009 COM(2009) 363 final, p. 9 Google Scholar
    Agence Europe, Russia refuses to be compelled to apply EU-envisaged reforms to its energy sector, Brussels, 29 April 2008 Google Scholar
    Leonard, M. and Popescu, N., A Power Audit of EU–Russia Relations (European Council on Foreign Relations, November 2007), p. 48 Google Scholar
    Blockmans, S. and Van Vooren, B., ‘Revitalizing the European Neighbourhood Economic Community, The Case for Legally Binding Sectoral Multilateralism’ (2012) 17 European Foreign Affairs Review 577–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Van Vooren, , EU External Relations Law and the European Neighbourhood Policy: A Paradigm for Coherence (Abingdon/New York: Routledge, 2012), pp. 203–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Solana, J., Address to the External Energy Policy Conference, Brussels, 20 November 2006, DOC S324/06Google Scholar
    Monar, J., ‘The Rejection of the EU–US SWIFT Interim Agreement by the European Parliament: A Historic Vote and its Implications’ (2010) 15 European Foreign Affairs Review 143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Taylor, S., ‘Safety-First Approach to European Energy Policy’, European Voice, 23–29 June 2011 Google Scholar
    Proposal from the Commission, Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up an information exchange mechanism with regard to intergovernmental agreements between Member States and third countries in the field of energy, 7 September 2011, COM(2011) 540Google Scholar
    Council Conclusions, Energy 2020: A Strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy, Brussels, 28 February 2011, p. 1 Google Scholar
    Proposal from the Commission, Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up an information exchange mechanism with regard to intergovernmental agreements between Member States and third countries in the field of energy, 7 September 2011, COM(2011) 540, p. 2Google Scholar
    Aalto, P., The EU–Russian Energy Dialogue (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008), p. 68 Google Scholar
    Council of the European Union, The Council gives go-ahead for negotiations on Trans-Caspian Pipeline System, Brussels, 12 September 2011, DOC 14095/11Google Scholar

    Save book to Kindle

    To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Dropbox

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

    Available formats
    ×

    Save book to Google Drive

    To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

    Available formats
    ×