Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:20:03.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

b - Embedding the Multinational Corporation in Transnational Sustainability Governance

from 2 - The Multinational Corporate Group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Luc Fransen
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
Grietje Baars
Affiliation:
City University London
Andre Spicer
Affiliation:
City University London
Get access

Summary

This chapter explores the embedding of the multinational corporation in new forms of global governance through the proliferation of transnational private regulatory and public–private regulatory instruments focusing on labour standards, human rights and the environment. It critically interrogates the relationship between such ‘privatization’ of governance and the political strategies of corporations.

The chapter first discusses the emergence of such modes of cross-border governance of production of mass consumer goods and commodities from the 1990s onwards. It then discusses how governance has led to concerns among academics, practitioners and critics about growth of multinational corporate power, social and environmental concerns becoming subject to corporate agendas, increasingly unaccountable decision making and the hollowing out of the state. Some of these concerns, the chapter argues, are justified, but at the same time the transnational private sustainability governance architecture is also evolving in such a way as to increasingly constrain the multinational corporation, while offering possibilities for governments, international organization, producers from developing countries and civil society organizations to influence conditions of production of global consumer goods and agricultural commodities. Because of this, the embedding of multinational corporations in new transnational governance should be understood to constitute a field of recurring political contestation about conditions of production, rather than as a manifestation of corporate power. And this means that various corporate political activities often treated separately in the literature are relevant when considered together, including influencing the organization of production through its market power and buying practices, its efforts in shaping markets, its lobbying towards regulators, and its attempts to negotiate and collaborate with civil society groups.

The Emergence of Transnational Private Sustainability Governance

Since the 1980s, the organization of mass consumer goods production has become geographically dispersed and functionally disintegrated. Labour-intensive manufacturing increasingly takes place in regions of the world characterized by relatively low wage levels and an abundant non-skilled labour supply. Agricultural commodities and raw materials for production are also sourced from developing countries in Africa, Latin America and Asia. Studies point to an overall asymmetry in power relations, advantaging Northern buyer corporations vis-à-vis Southern supplier corporations in these chains.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Corporation
A Critical, Multi-Disciplinary Handbook
, pp. 257 - 267
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anner, M., Bair, J., and Blasi, J (2013) ‘Towards joint liability in global supply chains: addressing the root causes of labor violations in international subcontracting networks’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 35(1): 1–43.Google Scholar
Ascoly, N., and Finney, C. (2005) ‘The shifting patterns of women's work’, in Clean Clothes Campaign (ed.) Made by Women (Amsterdam: Clean Clothes Campaign) 56–65.
Auld, G., and Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2010) ‘Transparency in nonstate certification: consequences for accountability and legitimacy’, Global Environmental Politics 10(3): 97–119.Google Scholar
Auld, G., Gulbrandsen, L. H., and McDermott, C. L. (2008) ‘Certification schemes and the impacts on forests and forestry’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33(1): 187–211.Google Scholar
Barrientos, S., and Smith, S. (2007) ‘Do workers benefit from ethical trade? Assessing codes of labour practice in global production systems’, Third World Quarterly 28(4): 713–729.Google Scholar
Bartley, T. (2003) ‘Certifying forests and factories: states, social movements, and the rise of private regulation in the apparel and forest products fields’, Politics and Society 31(3): 433–464.Google Scholar
Bartley, T. (2014) ‘Transnational governance and the re‐centered state: sustainability or legality?’, Regulation and Governance 8(1): 93–99.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. (2011) ‘Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance’, Review of International Political Economy 18(1): 17–51.Google Scholar
Cashore, B. (2002) ‘Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority’, Governance 15(4): 503–529.Google Scholar
Cashore, B., and Stone, M. (2012) ‘Can legality verification rescue global forest governance? Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in southeast Asia’, Forest Policy and Economics 18: 13–22.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, K. (2008) ‘Private transnational governance and the developing world: a comparative perspective’, International Studies Quarterly 52: 607–634.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, K., and Pattberg, P. (2009) ‘World politics and organizational fields: the case of transnational sustainability governance’, European Journal of International Relations 15(4): 707–743.Google Scholar
Fransen, L. (2011) ‘Why do private governance organizations not converge? A political–institutional analysis of transnational labour standards regulation’, Governance 24(2): 359–387.Google Scholar
Fransen, L. (2012a) Corporate Social Responsibility and Global Labor Standards: Firms and Activists in the Making of Private Regulation (New York: Routledge).
Fransen, L. (2012b) ‘Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions: legitimation politics in the institutional design of corporate social responsibility’, Socio-Economic Review 10: 163–192.Google Scholar
Fransen, L. (2013) ‘Global companies and the private regulation of global labor standards’, in Mikler, J. (ed.), The Handbook of Global Companies (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell) 437–455.
Fransen, L., and Burgoon, B. (2012) ‘A market for worker rights: explaining business preferences for private labour regulation’, Review of International Political Economy 19(2): 236–266.Google Scholar
Fransen, L., and Burgoon, B. (2013a) ‘Global labor standards advocacy by European civil society organizations: trends and developments’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 53 (2): 204–230, doi 10.1111/bjir.12017.Google Scholar
Fransen, L., and Burgoon, B. (2013b) ‘Privatizing or socializing corporate responsibility: business participation in voluntary programs’ Business and Society, doi 10.1177/0007650313475784.
Fransen, L., and Conzelmann, T. (2014) ‘Fragmented or cohesive transnational private regulation of sustainability standards? A comparative study’, Regulation and Governance 9(3): 259–275, doi 10.1111/rego.12055.Google Scholar
Fransen, L., and Kolk, A. (2007) ‘Global rule-setting for business: a critical analysis of multi-stakeholder standards’, Organization 14(5): 667–684.Google Scholar
Fransen, L., and Kolk, A. (2013) ‘Who governs CSR? Institutional positions in and interactions among international CSR standards’, Paper presented at the University of Amsterdam Transnational Rulemaking Workshop, July.
Friedman, M. (1970) ‘The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’, New York Times Magazine,13 September.
Fuchs, D., and Kalfagianni, A. (2010) ‘The causes and consequences of private food governance’, Business and Politics 12(3): 145–181.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G. (1999) ‘International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain’, Journal of international economics 48(1): 37–70.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G. (2014) ‘Global value chains in a post-Washington consensus world’, Review of International Political Economy 21(1): 9–37, doi 10.1080/09692290.2012.756414.Google Scholar
Guarín, A., and Knorringa, P. (2013) ‘New middle-class consumers in rising powers: responsible consumption and private standards’, Oxford Development Studies 42: 1–21.Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, L. (2008) ‘Accountability arrangements in non-state standards organizations: instrumental design and imitation’, Organization 15: 563–583.Google Scholar
Haight, C., and Henderson, D. R. (2010) ‘Fair trade is counterproductive and unfair: rejoinder’, Economic Affairs 30(1) 88–91.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. (2001) ‘Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function’, European Financial Management 7(3): 297–317.Google Scholar
Klein, N. (2000) No Logo (New York: Harper Collins).
Lambooy, T. (2009) ‘Case study: the international CSR conflict and mediation’, Nederlands-Vlaams Tijdschrift voor Mediation en Conflictmanagement 13(2): 5–46.Google Scholar
Locke, R. M. (2013) The Promise and Limits of Private Power: Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Lubbers, E. (2002) Schone Schijn: Smerige Streken in De Strijd tussen Burgers en Bedrijven (Amsterdam: Fagel).
Merk, J. (2011) ‘Production beyond the horizon of consumption: spatial fixes and anti-sweatshop struggles in the global athletic footwear industry’, Global Society 25(1): 73–95.Google Scholar
Merk, J. (2014) ‘The rise of tier 1 firms in the global garment industry: challenges for labour rights advocates’, Oxford Development Studies 42(2): 277–295.Google Scholar
Ngai, P. (2005) Made in China: Subject, Power and Resistance in a Global Workplace (Durham: Durham University Press).
Nova, S. (2012) ‘The Worker Rights Consortium's Designated Supplier Program’, Presentation at Global Worker Rights Centre Inaugural Workshop, Penn State University, March.
Overdevest, C., and Zeitlin, J. (2012) ‘Assembling an experimentalist regime: transnational governance interactions in the forest sector’, Regulation and Governance 8 (1): 22–48 doi 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01133.x.Google Scholar
Ponte, S. (2013) ‘Roundtabling sustainability: lessons from the biofuel industry’, Geoforum 54: 261–271.Google Scholar
Ponte, S., and Cheyns, E. (2013) ‘Voluntary standards, expert knowledge and the governance of sustainability networks’, Global Networks 13(4): 459–477.Google Scholar
Potts, J., Lynch, M., Wilkings, A., Huppé, G., Cunningham, M., and Voora, V. (2014) The State of Sustainability Initiatives Review 2014: Standards and the Green Economy (Winnipeg/London: IISD/IIED), www.iisd.org/pdf/2014/ssi_2014.pdf.
Raynolds, L., and Long, M. (2007) ‘Fair\alternative trade: historical and empirical dimensions’, in Raynolds, L., Murray, D. and Wilkinson, J. (eds.). Fair Trade: The Challenges of Transforming Globalization (London: Routledge,) 15–29.
Reich, R. (2008) ‘The case against corporate social responsibility’, Working Paper No. GSPP08–003 (Berkeley, CA: Goldman School of Public Policy).
Reinecke, J., Manning, S., and Von Hagen, O. (2012) ‘The emergence of a standards market: multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry’, Organization Studies 33: 613–632.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. G., and Kell, G. (1999) Global markets and social legitimacy: the case of the global compact, www.csmworld.org and www.yorku.ca/drache/talks/pdf/apd_ruggiekellfin.pdf.
Sabel, C. F. (2014) ‘On Richard M. Locke, the promise and limits of private power: promoting labor standards in a global economy’, Socio-Economic Review 12(1): 219–235.Google Scholar
Sasser, E. N., Prakash, A., Cashore, B., and Auld, G. (2006) ‘Direct targeting as an NGO political strategy: examining private authority regimes in the forestry sector’, Business and Politics 8(3): 1–32.Google Scholar
Schleifer, P. (2013) ‘Orchestrating sustainability: the case of European Union Biofuel Governance’, Regulation and governance 7(4): 533–546.Google Scholar
Seidman, G. (2007) Beyond the Boycott: Labor Rights, Human Rights, and Transnational Activism (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).
Spence, C. (2007) ‘Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourseAccounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 20(6): 855–882.Google Scholar
Summer, A., et al. (2013) The COSA measuring sustainability report (Philadelphia, PA: Committee on Sustainability Assessment), http://thecosa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/The-COSA-Measuring-Sustainability-Report.pdf.
UNCTAD (2014) ‘Measuring sustainability: the trade and impact of voluntary sustainability standards’, Presentation at United Nations Head Offices, January 2014, Geneva.
Van Roozendaal, G. (2002) Trade Unions and Global Governance: The Debate on a Trade Clause (London and New York: Continuum).
Vermeulen, R (2014) ‘The living wage and fair wear foundation’, Presentation at ISEAL Alliance Annual Conference, May 2014, London.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×