Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T17:42:55.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2015

Noam Lupu
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

Formal model of partisanship and vote choice

Consider a multiparty democracy with M parties. Voters develop a perception of a party's brand over time on the basis of observations of party behavior. This brand is the perceived position of the party on the real line. For a voter who observes n actions by a party, denote her jth observation by yj, where j ∈ {1,...,n}. Voters observe some subset of the actions taken by parties in each electoral cycle – with some voters of course drawing more observations from this distribution than others – and use these observations to update their beliefs about party brands. I assume that each observation yj is a random draw from a distribution of observable party actions with unknown mean μ and unknown variance σ2. For simplicity, I assume a normal distribution of party actions, meaning that yjiid N(μ, σ2) for all j. Denote the sample mean of yj by ȳ.

During any particular electoral cycle, let k denote the number of observations on which a voter's prior beliefs about the party are based, such that at the end of each electoral cycle kn = k + n. Similarly, let v denote the degrees of freedom in the uncertainty of the voter's prior beliefs, such that vn = v + n.

For convenience, I assume that an individual's prior belief about the mean and variance of a party's position is represented by the normal-inverse-chisquared distribution, such that the posterior and prior distributions are drawn from the same family of distributions. As a result, prior beliefs about μ and σ2 are given by μ, σ2|yNχ2(μn, kn, vn, σ2n), where k, v, σ2 > ○. Decomposing the joint distribution of μ and σ2 into p(μ, σ2) = p(μ|σ2)p(σ2), we find that the true distribution of party actions given its variance (μ|σ2) is normally distributed with mean μ and variance. Here represents the voter's best guess about the position of the party at time ○ – that is, her prior – and represents the amount of uncertainty about that best guess. That uncertainty is based on the actual variance in the distribution of party actions (σ2) and the number of observations on which a voter's prior beliefs are based (k).

Type
Chapter
Information
Party Brands in Crisis
Partisanship, Brand Dilution, and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America
, pp. 185 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Appendix
  • Noam Lupu, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Book: Party Brands in Crisis
  • Online publication: 18 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139683562.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Appendix
  • Noam Lupu, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Book: Party Brands in Crisis
  • Online publication: 18 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139683562.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Appendix
  • Noam Lupu, University of Wisconsin, Madison
  • Book: Party Brands in Crisis
  • Online publication: 18 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139683562.009
Available formats
×