Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T19:31:32.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - State practice

from PART II - The new boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Thomas Cottier
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Unilateral acts (proclamations and legislation)

In the process of claims and responses, unilateral practice and acts of states are of importance in assessing the status of methods of delimitation. This chapter analyses the period from 1942 to 1992, comprehensively covering the formative stage of the continental shelf doctrine and of the EEZ. This prepares the ground for assessing state practice and customary international law in Chapter 7, taking into account the record of judicial settlement discussed in Chapter 6.

A. Continental shelf

Unilateral practice and acts reflect two of the three models discussed prior to UNCLOS III. While many documents do not explicitly address the principles and methods of delimitation applied, others refer to the models of equitable principles and the concept of equidistance–special circumstances, albeit with different weight and significance. In no case was the concept of the legal vacuum (ex aequo et bono) found to be formally applied.

  1. (i) Given the early uncertainty of the law on maritime boundary delimitation during the 1950s, it is hardly surprising that most of the post World War II proclamations on the shelf did not address the issue of boundary delimitation at all, or merely referred to settlement by agreement. They did not indicate any standards of delimitation. The 1964 declaration of the Federal Republic of Germany on the continental shelf is an example it point. It refers to international agreement and thus implicitly to general international law to the extent that boundaries will be settled in court.

  2. (ii) Several states, although not many, explicitly referred to equidistance or the median line. Iraq is an example in point. Norway claimed rights of exploration and exploitation of the soil and the subsoil ‘within as well as outside the maritime boundaries otherwise applicable, but not beyond the median line in relation to other States’. Another form of reference to the median line was used in terms of a residual rule by Italy to be applied pending agreement. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation
The Quest for Distributive Justice in International Law
, pp. 236 - 270
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • State practice
  • Thomas Cottier, Universität Bern, Switzerland
  • Book: Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139944588.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • State practice
  • Thomas Cottier, Universität Bern, Switzerland
  • Book: Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139944588.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • State practice
  • Thomas Cottier, Universität Bern, Switzerland
  • Book: Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation
  • Online publication: 05 May 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139944588.007
Available formats
×