Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T12:09:02.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2017

Martin J. Blunt
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Multiphase Flow in Permeable Media
A Pore-Scale Perspective
, pp. 447 - 474
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, A. W., and Gast, A. P. 1997. Physical Chemistry of Surfaces. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Adler, P. M. 1990. Flow in simulated porous media. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 16(4), 691–712.Google Scholar
Adler, P. M. 2013. Porous Media: Geometry and Transports. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Aghaei, A., and Piri, M. 2015. Direct pore-to-core up-scaling of displacement processes: Dynamic pore network modeling and experimentation. Journal of Hydrology, 522, 488–509.Google Scholar
Ahrenholz, B., Tolke, J., Lehmann, P., Peters, A., Kaestner, A., Krafczyk, M., and Durner, W. 2008. Prediction of capillary hysteresis in a porous material using lattice-Boltzmann methods and comparison to experimental data and a morphological pore network model. Advances in Water Resources, 31(9), 1151–1173.Google Scholar
Aissaoui, A. 1983. Etude théorique et expérimentale de lhystérésis des pressions capillaries et des perméabilitiés relatives en vue du stockage souterrain de gaz. PhD thesis, Ecole des Mines de Paris, Paris.
Akbarabadi, M., and Piri, M. 2013. Relative permeability hysteresis and capillary trapping characteristics of supercritical CO2/brine systems: An experimental study at reservoir conditions. Advances in Water Resources, 52, 190–206.Google Scholar
Akbarabadi, M., and Piri, M. 2014. Nanotomography of Spontaneous Imbibition in Shale. URTeC: 1922555, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference.
Aker, E., Måløy, K. J., Hansen, A., and Batrouni, G. G. 1998. A two-dimensional network simulator for two-phase flow in porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 32(2), 163–186.Google Scholar
Aker, E., Måløy, K. J., Hansen, A., and Basak, S. 2000. Burst dynamics during drainage displacements in porous media: Simulations and experiments. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 51(1), 55–61.Google Scholar
Al-Dhahli, A., Geiger, S., and van Dijke, M. I. J. 2012. Three-phase pore-network modeling for reservoirs with arbitrary wettability. SPE Journal, 18(2), 285–295.Google Scholar
Al-Dhahli, A., van Dijke, M. I. J., and Geiger, S. 2013. Accurate modelling of pore-scale films and layers for three-phase flow processes in clastic and carbonate rocks with arbitrary wettability. Transport in Porous Media, 98(2), 259–286.Google Scholar
Al-Futaisi, A., and Patzek, T. W. 2003a. Extension of Hoshen-Kopelman algorithm to nonlattice environments. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 321(3–4), 665–678.Google Scholar
Al-Futaisi, A., and Patzek, T. W. 2003b. Impact of wettability alteration on two-phase flow characteristics of sandstones: A quasi-static description. Water Resources Research, 39(2), 1042.Google Scholar
Al-Gharbi, M. S., and Blunt, M. J. 2005. Dynamic network modeling of two-phase drainage in porous media. Physical Review E, 71(1), 016308.Google Scholar
Al Mansoori, S. K., Iglauer, S., Pentland, C. H., and Blunt, M. J. 2009. Three-phase measurements of oil and gas trapping in sand packs. Advances in Water Resources, 32(10), 1535–1542.Google Scholar
Al Mansoori, S. K., Itsekiri, E., Iglauer, S., Pentland, C. H., Bijeljic, B., and Blunt, M. J. 2010. Measurements of non-wetting phase trapping applied to carbon dioxide storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4(2), 283–288.Google Scholar
Al-Menhali, A., Niu, B., and Krevor, S. 2015. Capillarity and wetting of carbon dioxide and brine during drainage in Berea sandstone at reservoir conditions. Water Resources Research, 51(10), 7895–7914.Google Scholar
Al-Menhali, A. S., and Krevor, S. 2016. Capillary trapping of CO2 in oil reservoirs: observations in a mixed-wet carbonate rock. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(5), 2727–2734.Google Scholar
Al-Raoush, R. I. 2009. Impact of wettability on pore-scale characteristics of residual nonaqueous phase liquids. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(13), 4796–4801.Google Scholar
Al-Raoush, R. I., and Willson, C. S. 2005. Extraction of physically realistic pore network properties from three-dimensional synchrotron X-ray microtomography images of unconsolidated porous media systems. Journal of Hydrology, 300(1–4), 44–64.Google Scholar
Alava, M., Dubé, M., and Rost, M. 2004. Imbibition in disordered media. Advances in Physics, 53(2), 83–175.Google Scholar
Alizadeh, A. H., and Piri, M. 2014a. The effect of saturation history on three-phase relative permeability: An experimental study. Water Resources Research, 50(2), 1636–1664.Google Scholar
Alizadeh, A. H., and Piri, M. 2014b. Three-phase flow in porous media: A review of experimental studies on relative permeability. Reviews of Geophysics, 52(3), 468–521.Google Scholar
Alizadeh, A. H., Khishvand, M., Ioannidis, M. A., and Piri, M. 2014. Multi-scale experimental study of carbonated water injection: An effective process for mobilization and recovery of trapped oil. Fuel, 132, 219–235.Google Scholar
Alyafei, N. 2015. Capillary Trapping and Oil Recovery in Altered-Wettability Carbonate Rock. PhD thesis, Imperial College London.
Alyafei, N., and Blunt, M. J. 2016. The effect of wettability on capillary trapping in carbonates. Advances in Water Resources, 90, 36–50.Google Scholar
Alyafei, N., Raeini, A. Q., Paluszny, A., and Blunt, M. J. 2015. A sensitivity study of the effect of image resolution on predicted petrophysical properties. Transport in Porous Media, 110(1), 157–169.Google Scholar
Amaechi, B., Iglauer, S., Pentland, C. H., Bijeljic, B., and Blunt, M. J. 2014. An experimental study of three-phase trapping in sand packs. Transport in Porous Media, 103(3), 421–436.Google Scholar
Amaefule, J. O., and Handy, L. L. 1982. The effect of interfacial tensions on relative oil/water permeabilities of consolidated porous media. SPE Journal, 22(3), 371–381.Google Scholar
Amin, R., and Smith, T. N. 1998. Interfacial tension and spreading coefficient under reservoir conditions. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 142(12), 231–241.Google Scholar
Amott, E. 1959. Observations relating to the wettability of porous rock. Petroleum Transaction of the AIME, 216, 156–162.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. G. 1986. Wettability literature survey – Part 2: Wettability measurement. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 38(11), 1246–1462.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. G. 1987a. Wettability literature survey – Part 4: Effects of wettability on capillary pressure. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 39(10), 1283–1300.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. G. 1987b. Wettability literature survey – Part 5: The effects of wettability on relative permeability. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 39(11), 1453–1468.Google Scholar
Andrä, H., Combaret, N., J., Dvorkin, Glatt, E., Han, J., Kabel, M., Keehm, Y., Krzikalla, F., Lee, M., Madonna, C., Marsh, M., Mukerji, T., Saenger, E. H., Sain, R., Saxena, N., Ricker, S., Wiegmann, A., and Zhan, X. 2013a. Digital rock physics benchmarks – Part I: Imaging and segmentation. Computers & Geosciences, 50, 25–32.Google Scholar
Andrä, H., Combaret, N., J., Dvorkin, Glatt, E., Han, J., Kabel, M., Keehm, Y., Krzikalla, F., Lee, M., Madonna, C., Marsh, M., Mukerji, T., Saenger, E. H., Sain, R., Saxena, N., Ricker, S., Wiegmann, A., and Zhan, X. 2013b. Digital rock physics benchmarks – Part II: Computing effective properties. Computers & Geosciences, 50, 33–43.Google Scholar
Andrew, M. G. 2014. Reservoir-Condition Pore-Scale Imaging of Multiphase Flow. PhD thesis, Imperial College London.
Andrew, M. G., Bijeljic, B., and Blunt, M. J. 2013. Pore-scale imaging of geological carbon dioxide storage under in situ conditions. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(15), 3915–3918.Google Scholar
Andrew, M. G., Bijeljic, B., and Blunt, M. J. 2014a. Pore-by-pore capillary pressure measurements using X-ray microtomography at reservoir conditions: Curvature, snap-off, and remobilization of residual CO2. Water Resources Research, 50(11), 8760–8774.Google Scholar
Andrew, M. G., Bijeljic, B., and Blunt, M. J. 2014b. Pore-scale contact angle measurements at reservoir conditions using X-ray microtomography. Advances in Water Resources, 68, 24–31.Google Scholar
Andrew, M. G., Bijeljic, B., and Blunt, M. J. 2014c. Pore-scale imaging of trapped supercritical carbon dioxide in sandstones and carbonates. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 22, 1–14.Google Scholar
Andrew, M. G., Menke, H., Blunt, M. J., and Bijeljic, B. 2015. The imaging of dynamic multiphase fluid flow using synchrotron-based x-ray microtomography at reservoir conditions. Transport in Porous Media, 110(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Anton, L., and Hilfer, R. 1999. Trapping and mobilization of residual fluid during capillary desaturation in porous media. Physical Review E, 59(6), 6819–6823.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. T., and Berg, S. 2013. Interfacial velocities and capillary pressure gradients during Haines jumps. Physical Review E, 88(4), 043010.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. T., Porter, M. L., and Wildenschild, D. 2012. Linking pore-scale interfacial curvature to column-scale capillary pressure. Advances in Water Resources, 46, 55–62.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. T., Georgiadis, A., Ott, H., Klemin, D., and Berg, S. 2014a. Critical capillary number: Desaturation studied with fast X-ray computed microtomography. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(1), 55–60.Google Scholar
Armstrong, R. T., Ott, H., Georgiadis, A., Rücker, M., Schwing, A., and Berg, S. 2014b. Subsecond pore-scale displacement processes and relaxation dynamics in multiphase flow. Water Resources Research, 50(12), 9162–9176.Google Scholar
Arns, C. H., Knackstedt, M. A., Pinczewski, W. V., and Lindquist, W. B. 2001. Accurate estimation of transport properties from microtomographic images. Geophysical Research Letters, 28(17), 3361–3364.Google Scholar
Arns, C. H., Knackstedt, M. A., Pinczewski, W. V., and Martys, N. S. 2004. Virtual permeametry on microtomographic images. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 45(1–2), 41–46.Google Scholar
Arns, C. H., Knackstedt, M. A., and Martys, N. S. 2005. Cross-property correlations and permeability estimation in sandstone. Physical Review E, 72(4), 046304.Google Scholar
Arns, C. H., Knackstedt, M. A., and Mecke, K. R. 2009. Boolean reconstructions of complex materials: Integral geometric approach. Physical Review E, 80(5), 051303.Google Scholar
Avraam, D. G., and Payatakes, A. C. 1995a. Flow regimes and relative permeabilities during steadystate two-phase flow in porous media. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 293, 207–236.Google Scholar
Avraam, D. G., and Payatakes, A. C. 1995b. Generalized relative permeability coefficients during steady-state two-phase flow in porous media, and correlation with the flow mechanisms. Transport in Porous Media, 20(1–2), 135–168.Google Scholar
Aziz, K., and Settari, A. 1979. Petroleum Reservoir Simulation. Chapman & Hall, London.
Baker, L. E. 1988. Three-phase relative permeability correlations. SPE 17369, proceedings of the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 16–21 April.
Bakke, S., and Øren, P. E. 1997. 3-D pore-scale modelling of sandstones and flow simulations in the pore networks. SPE Journal, 2(2), 136–149.Google Scholar
Baldwin, C. A., Sederman, A. J., Mantle, M. D., Alexander, P., and Gladden, L. F. 1996. Determination and characterization of the structure of a pore space from 3D volume images. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 181(1), 79–92.Google Scholar
Bardon, C., and Longeron, D. G. 1980. Influence of very low interfacial tensions on relative permeability. SPE Journal, 20(5), 391–401.Google Scholar
Barenblatt, G. I. 1971. Filtration of two non-mixing fluids in a homogeneous porous medium. Fluid Dynamics, 6(5), 857–864.Google Scholar
Barenblatt, G. I., Entov, V. M., and Ryzhik, V. M. 1990. Theory of Fluid Flows Through Natural Rocks. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Barenblatt, G. I., Patzek, T. W., and Silin, D. B. 2003. The mathematical model of nonequilibrium effects in water-oil displacement. SPE Journal, 8(4), 409–416.Google Scholar
Bartell, F. E., and Osterhof, H. J. 1927. Determination of the wettability of a solid by a liquid. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 19, 1277–1280.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1967. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bauters, T. W. J., Steenhuis, T. S., Parlange, J. Y., and DiCarlo, D. A. 1998. Preferential flow in water-repellent sands. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America, 62(5), 1185–1190.Google Scholar
Bauters, T. W. J., Steenhuis, T. S., DiCarlo, D. A., Nieber, J. L., Dekker, L. W., Ritsema, C. J., Parlange, J. Y., and Haverkamp, R. 2000. Physics of water repellent soils. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232, 233–243.Google Scholar
Bear, J. 1972. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. Dover Publications, Mineola, New York.
Behbahani, H., and Blunt, M. J. 2005. Analysis of imbibition in mixed-wet rocks using pore-scale modeling. SPE Journal, 10(4), 466–474.Google Scholar
Ben-Avraham, D., and Havlin, S. 2000. Diffusion and Reactions in Fractals and Disordered Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bennion, B., and Bachu, S. 2008. Drainage and imbibition relative permeability relationships for supercritical CO2/brine and H2S/brine systems in intergranular sandstone, carbonate, shale, and anhydrite rocks. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 11(3), 487–486.Google Scholar
Berg, S., Cense, A. W., Hofman, J. P., and Smits, R. M. M. 2008. Two-phase flow in porous media with slip boundary condition. Transport in Porous Media, 74(3), 275–292.Google Scholar
Berg, S., Ott, H., Klapp, S. A., Schwing, A., Neiteler, R., Brussee, N., Makurat, A., Leu, L., Enzmann, F., Schwarz, J. O., Kersten, M., Irvine, S., and Stampanoni, M. 2013. Real-time 3D imaging of Haines jumps in porous media flow. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(10), 3755–3759.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, B., Cortis, A., Dentz, M., and Scher, H. 2006. Modeling non-Fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk. Reviews of Geophysics, 44(2), RG2003.Google Scholar
Bianchi Janetti, E., Riva, M., and Guadagnini, A. 2015. Three-phase permeabilities: Upscaling, analytical solutions and uncertainty analysis in elementary pore structures. Transport in Porous Media, 106(2), 259–283.Google Scholar
Bianchi Janetti, E., Riva, M., and Guadagnini, A. 2016. Analytical expressions for three-phase generalized relative permeabilities in water- and oil-wet capillary tubes. Computational Geosciences, 20, 555–565.Google Scholar
Bijeljic, B., Mostaghimi, P., and Blunt, M. J. 2011. Signature of non-Fickian solute transport in complex heterogeneous porous media. Physical Review Letters, 107(20), 204502.Google Scholar
Bijeljic, B., Mostaghimi, P., and Blunt, M. J. 2013a. Insights into non-Fickian solute transport in carbonates. Water Resources Research, 49(5), 2714–2728.Google Scholar
Bijeljic, B., Raeini, A., Mostaghimi, P., and Blunt, M. J. 2013b. Predictions of non-Fickian solute transport in different classes of porous media using direct simulation on pore-scale images. Physical Review E, 87(1), 013011.Google Scholar
Birovljev, A., Furuberg, L., Feder, J., Jøssang, T., Måløy, K. J., and Aharony, A. 1991. Gravity invasion percolation in two dimensions: Experiment and simulation. Physical Review Letters, 67(5), 584–587.Google Scholar
Biswal, B., Manwart, C., Hilfer, R., Bakke, S., and Øren, P. E. 1999. Quantitative analysis of experimental and synthetic microstructures for sedimentary rock. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 273(3–4), 452–475.Google Scholar
Biswal, B., Øren, P. E., Held, R. J., Bakke, S., and Hilfer, R. 2007. Stochastic multiscale model for carbonate rocks. Physical Review E, 75(6), 061303.Google Scholar
Biswal, B., Held, R. J., Khanna, V., Wang, J., and Hilfer, R. 2009. Towards precise prediction of transport properties from synthetic computer tomography of reconstructed porous media. Physical Review E, 80(4), 041301.Google Scholar
Blunt, M., and King, P. 1990. Macroscopic parameters from simulations of pore scale flow. Physical Review A, 42(8), 4780–4787.Google Scholar
Blunt, M., and King, P. 1991. Relative permeabilities from two- and three-dimensional pore-scale network modelling. Transport in Porous Media, 6(4), 407–433.Google Scholar
Blunt, M., King, M. J., and Scher, H. 1992. Simulation and theory of two-phase flow in porous media. Physical Review A, 46(12), 7680–7699.Google Scholar
Blunt, M., Zhou, D., and Fenwick, D. 1995. Three-phase flow and gravity drainage in porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 20(1–2), 77–103.Google Scholar
Blunt, M. J. 1997a. Effects of heterogeneity and wetting on relative permeability using pore level modeling. SPE Journal, 2(4), 70–87.Google Scholar
Blunt, M. J. 1997b. Pore level modeling of the effects of wettability. SPE Journal, 2(1), 494–510.Google Scholar
Blunt, M. J. 1998. Physically-based network modeling of multiphase flow in intermediate-wet porous media. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 20(3–4), 117–125.Google Scholar
Blunt, M. J. 2000. An empirical model for three-phase relative permeability. SPE Journal, 5(4), 435–445.Google Scholar
Blunt, M. J. 2001a. Constraints on contact angles for multiple phases in thermodynamic equilibrium. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 239(1), 281–282.Google Scholar
Blunt, M. J. 2001b. Flow in porous media – pore-network models and multiphase flow. Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science, 6(3), 197–207.Google Scholar
Blunt, M. J., and Bijeljic, B. 2016. Imperial College Consortium on Pore-scale Modelling. http://www.imperial.ac.uk/engineering/departments/earth-science/research/research-groups/perm/research/pore-scale-modelling/.
Blunt, M. J., and Scher, H. 1995. Pore-level modeling of wetting. Physical Review E, 52(6), 6387–6403.Google Scholar
Blunt, M. J., Barker, J.W., Rubin, B., Mansfield, M., Culverwell, I. D., and Christie, M. A. 1994. Predictive theory for viscous fingering in compositional displacement. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 9(1), 73–80.Google Scholar
Blunt, M. J., Bijeljic, B., Dong, H., Gharbi, O., Iglauer, S., Mostaghimi, P., Paluszny, A., and Pentland, C. 2013. Pore-scale imaging and modelling. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 197–216.Google Scholar
Boek, E. S., and Venturoli, M. 2010. Lattice-Boltzmann studies of fluid flow in porous media with realistic rock geometries. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 59(7), 2305–2314.Google Scholar
Bondino, I., Hamon, G., Kallel, W., and Kachuma, D. 2013. Relative permeabilities from simulation in 3D rock models and equivalent pore networks: Critical review and way forward. Petrophysics, 54(6), 538–546.Google Scholar
Bourbiaux, B. J., and Kalaydjian, F. J. 1990. Experimental study of cocurrent and countercurrent flows in natural porous media. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 5(3), 361–368.Google Scholar
Bourbie, T., and Zinszner, B. 1985. Hydraulic and acoustic properties as a function of porosity in Fontainebleau sandstone. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90(B13), 11524–11532.Google Scholar
Broadbent, S. R., and Hammersley, J. M. 1957. Percolation processes. I. Crystals and mazes. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 53, 629–641.Google Scholar
Brooks, R. H., and Corey, T. 1964. Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrology Papers, Colorado State University.
Brown, K., Schülter, S., Sheppard, A., and Wildenschild, D. 2014. On the challenges of measuring interfacial characteristics of three-phase fluid flow with x-ray microtomography. Journal of Microscopy, 253(3), 171–182.Google Scholar
Brown, R. J. S., and Fatt, I. 1956. Measurements Of Fractional Wettability Of Oil Fields' Rocks By The Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Method. SPE 743-G, proceedings of the Fall Meeting of the Petroleum Branch of AIME, Los Angeles, California, 14–17 October.
Brun, F., Mancini, L., Kasae, P., Favretto, S., Dreossi, D., and Tromba, G. 2010. Pore3D: A software library for quantitative analysis of porous media. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 615(3), 326–332.Google Scholar
Brusseau, M. L., Peng, S., Schnaar, G., and Murao, A. 2007. Measuring air-water interfacial areas with X-ray microtomography and interfacial partitioning tracer tests. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(6), 1956–1961.Google Scholar
Bryant, S., and Blunt, M. 1992. Prediction of relative permeability in simple porous media. Physical Review A, 46(4), 2004–2011.Google Scholar
Bryant, S. L., King, P. R., and Mellor, D. W. 1993a. Network model evaluation of permeability and spatial correlation in a real random sphere packing. Transport in Porous Media, 11(1), 53–70.Google Scholar
Bryant, S. L., Mellor, D. W., and Cade, C. A. 1993b. Physically representative network models of transport in porous media. AIChE Journal, 39(3), 387–396.Google Scholar
Buckingham, E. 1907. Studies on the movement of soil moisture. USDA Bureau of Soils Bulletin, 38, 61–70.Google Scholar
Buckley, J. S., and Liu, Y. 1998. Some mechanisms of crude oil/brine/solid interactions. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 20(3–4), 155–160.Google Scholar
Buckley, J. S., Takamura, K., and Morrow, N. R. 1989. Influence of electrical surface charges on the wetting properties of crude oils. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 4(3), 332–341.Google Scholar
Buckley, J. S., Bousseau, C., and Liu, Y. 1996. Wetting alteration by brine and crude oil: From contact angles to cores. SPE Journal, 1(3), 341–50.Google Scholar
Buckley, S. E., and Leverett, M. C. 1942. Mechanism of fluid displacement in sands. Petroleum Transactions of the AIME, 146(1), 107–116.Google Scholar
Bultreys, T., Van Hoorebeke, L., and Cnudde, V. 2015a. Multi-scale, micro-computed tomographybased pore network models to simulate drainage in heterogeneous rocks. Advances in Water Resources, 78, 36–49.Google Scholar
Bultreys, T., Boone, M. A., Boone, M. N., De Schryver, T., Masschaele, B., Van Loo, D., Van Hoorebeke, L., and Cnudde, V. 2015b. Real-time visualization of Haines jumps in sandstone with laboratory-based microcomputed tomography. Water Resources Research, 51(10), 8668–8676.Google Scholar
Bultreys, T., Boone, M. A., Boone, M. N., De Schryver, T., Masschaele, B., Van Hoorebeke, L., and Cnudde, V. 2016a. Fast laboratory-based micro-computed tomography for pore-scale research: Illustrative experiments and perspectives on the future. Advances in Water Resources, 95, 341–351.Google Scholar
Bultreys, T., De Boever, W., and Cnudde, V. 2016b. Imaging and image-based fluid transport modeling at the pore scale in geological materials: A practical introduction to the current state-of-the-art. Earth-Science Reviews, 155, 93–128.Google Scholar
Burdine, N. T. 1953. Relative permeability calculations from pore size distribution data. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 5(3), 71–78.Google Scholar
Caers, J. 2005. Petroleum Geostatistics. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, Texas.
Carlson, F. M. 1981. Simulation of Relative Permeability Hysteresis to the Nonwetting Phase. SPE 10157, proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Meeting and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 4–7 October.
Carman, P. C. 1956. Flow of Gases Through Porous Media. Butterworths, London.
Casado, C. M. M. 2012. Laplace. La mecánica celeste. RBA Publishers, Barcelona.
Caubit, C., Bertin, H., and Hamon, G. 2004. Three-Phase Flow in Porous Media: Wettability Effect on Residual Saturations During Gravity Drainage and Tertiary Waterflood. SPE 90099, proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 26–29 September.
Cazabat, A. M., Gerdes, S., Valignat, M. P., and Villette, S. 1997. Dynamics of wetting: From theory to experiment. Interface Science, 5(2–3), 129–139.Google Scholar
Chandler, R., Koplik, J., Lerman, K., and Willemsen, J. F. 1982. Capillary displacement and percolation in porous media. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 119, 249–267.Google Scholar
Chatzis, I., and Morrow, N. R. 1984. Correlation of capillary number relationships for sandstone. SPE Journal, 24(5), 555–562.Google Scholar
Chatzis, I., Morrow, N. R., and Lim, H. T. 1983. Magnitude and detailed structure of residual oil saturation. SPE Journal, 23(2), 311–326.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, K., Bayani Cardenas, M., Wolfe, W. W., Maisano, J. A., Ketcham, R. A., and Bennett, P. C. 2013. Pore-scale trapping of supercritical CO2 and the role of grain wettability and shape. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(15), 3878–3882.Google Scholar
Chen, J. D., and Koplik, J. 1985. Immiscible fluid displacement in small networks. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 108(2), 304–330.Google Scholar
Chen, S., and Doolen, G. D. 1998. Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 30(1), 329–364.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. X., Zimmerman, R.W., Bodvarsson, G. S., andWitherspoon, P. A. 1990. A new formulation for one-dimensional horizontal imbibition in unsaturated porous media. Lawrence Berkeley Preprint LBL-28638.
Cieplak, M., and Robbins, M. O. 1988. Dynamical transition in quasistatic fluid invasion in porous media. Physical Review Letters, 60(20), 2042–2045.Google Scholar
Cieplak, M., and Robbins, M. O. 1990. Influence of contact angle on quasistatic fluid invasion of porous media. Physical Review B, 41(16), 11508–11521.Google Scholar
Cnudde, V., and Boone, M. N. 2013. High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences: A review of the current technology and applications. Earth-Science Reviews, 123, 1–17.Google Scholar
Coker, D. A., Torquato, S., and Dunsmuir, J. H. 1996. Morphology and physical properties of Fontainebleau sandstone via a tomographic analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 101(B8), 17497–17506.Google Scholar
Coles, M. E., Hazlett, R. D., Spanne, P., Soll, W. E.,Muegge, E. L., and Jones, K.W. 1998. Pore level imaging of fluid transport using synchrotron X-ray microtomography. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 19(1–2), 55–63.Google Scholar
Constantinides, G. N., and Payatakes, A. C. 2000. Effects of precursor wetting films in immiscible displacement through porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 38(3), 291–317.Google Scholar
Corey, A. T. 1954. The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities. Producers Monthly, 19(1), 38–41.Google Scholar
Costanza-Robinson, M. S., Harrold, K. H., and Lieb-Lappen, R. M. 2008. X-ray microtomography determination of air-water interfacial area-water saturation relationships in sandy porous media. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(8), 2949–2956.Google Scholar
Craig, F. F. 1971. The Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Waterflooding. Monograph Series 3, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, Texas.
Crocker, M. E. 1986. Wettability. Enhanced Oil Recovery, Progress Review for the Quarter Ending Sept. 30, DOE/BC-86/3, 47, 100–110.Google Scholar
Cueto-Felgueroso, L., and Juanes, R. 2008. Nonlocal interface dynamics and pattern formation in gravity-driven unsaturated flow through porous media. Physical Review Letters, 101(24), 244504.Google Scholar
Cueto-Felgueroso, L., and Juanes, R. 2009a. A phase field model of unsaturated flow. Water Resources Research, 45(10), W10409.Google Scholar
Cueto-Felgueroso, L., and Juanes, R. 2009b. Stability analysis of a phase-field model of gravitydriven unsaturated flow through porous media. Physical Review E, 79(3), 036301.Google Scholar
Cueto-Felgueroso, L., and Juanes, R. 2016. A discrete-domain description of multiphase flow in porous media: Rugged energy landscapes and the origin of hysteresis. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(4), 1615–1622.Google Scholar
Culligan, K. A., Wildenschild, D., Christensen, B. S. B., Gray, W. G., Rivers, M. L., and Tompson, A. F. B. 2004. Interfacial area measurements for unsaturated flow through a porous medium. Water Resources Research, 40(12), W12413.Google Scholar
Culligan, K. A., Wildenschild, D., Christensen, B. S. B., Gray, W. G., and Rivers, M. L. 2006. Porescale characteristics of multiphase flow in porous media: A comparison of air-water and oilwater experiments. Advances in Water Resources, 29(2), 227–238.Google Scholar
Dahle, H. K., and Celia, M. A. 1999. A dynamic network model for two-phase immiscible flow. Computational Geosciences, 3(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Dake, L. P. 1983. Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2nd Edition.
Darcy, H. 1856. Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon: English Translation, The Public Fountains of the City of Dijon, translated by P. Bobeck, Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa, 2004. Victor Dalmont, Paris.
Datta, S. S., Dupin, J. B., andWeitz, D. A. 2014a. Fluid breakup during simultaneous two-phase flow through a three-dimensional porous medium. Physics of Fluids, 26(6), 062004.Google Scholar
Datta, S. S., Ramakrishnan, T. S., and Weitz, D. A. 2014b. Mobilization of a trapped non-wetting fluid from a three-dimensional porous medium. Physics of Fluids, 26(2), 022002.Google Scholar
de Gennes, P. G. 1985. Wetting: statics and dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 57(3), 827–863.Google Scholar
de Gennes, P. G., Brochard-Wyatt, F., and Quérédef, D. 2003. Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls and Waves. Springer, New York.
Dehghanpour, H., Aminzadeh, B., Mirzaei, M., and DiCarlo, D. A. 2011a. Flow coupling during three-phase gravity drainage. Physical Review E, 83(6), 065302.Google Scholar
Dehghanpour, H., Aminzadeh, B., and DiCarlo, D. A. 2011b. Hydraulic conductance and viscous coupling of three-phase layers in angular capillaries. Physical Review E, 83(6), 066320.Google Scholar
Demianov, A., Dinariev, O., and Evseev, N. 2011. Density functional modelling in multiphase compositional hydrodynamics. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 89(2), 206–226.Google Scholar
Deng, W., Cardenas, M. Bayani, and Bennett, P. C. 2014. Extended Roof snap-off for a continuous non-wetting fluid and an example case for supercritical CO2. Advances in Water Resources, 64, 34–46.Google Scholar
Dernaika, M. R., Basioni, M. A., Dawoud, A. M., Kalam, M. Z., and Skjæveland, S. M. 2013. Variations in bounding and scanning relative permeability curves with different carbonate rock type. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 16(3), 265–280.Google Scholar
Dias, M. M., and Payatakes, A. C. 1986. Network models for two-phase flow in porous media Part 2. Motion of oil ganglia. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 164, 337–358.Google Scholar
Dias, M. M, and Wilkinson, D. 1986. Percolation with trapping. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 19(15), 3131–3146.Google Scholar
DiCarlo, D. A. 2004. Experimental measurements of saturation overshoot on infiltration. Water Resources Research, 40(4), W04215.Google Scholar
DiCarlo, D. A. 2013. Stability of gravity-driven multiphase flow in porous media: 40 years of advancements. Water Resources Research, 49(8), 4531–4544.Google Scholar
DiCarlo, D. A., Bauters, T. W. J., Darnault, C. J. G., Steenhuis, T. S., and Parlange, J. 1999. Lateral expansion of preferential flow paths in sands. Water Resources Research, 35(2), 427–434.Google Scholar
DiCarlo, D. A., Sahni, A., and Blunt, M. J. 2000a. The effect of wettability on three-phase relative permeability. Transport in Porous Media, 39(3), 347–366.Google Scholar
DiCarlo, D. A., Sahni, A., and Blunt, M. J. 2000b. Three-phase relative permeability of water-wet, oil-wet, and mixed-wet sandpacks. SPE Journal, 5(1), 82–91.Google Scholar
DiCarlo, D. A., Cidoncha, J. I. G., and Hickey, C. 2003. Acoustic measurements of pore-scale displacements. Geophysical Research Letters, 30(17), 1901.Google Scholar
DiCarlo, D. A., Juanes, R., LaForce, T., and Witelski, T. P. 2008. Nonmonotonic traveling wave solutions of infiltration into porous media. Water Resources Research, 44(2), W02406.Google Scholar
Ding, H., and Spelt, P. D. M. 2007. Inertial effects in droplet spreading: A comparison between diffuse-interface and level-set simulations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 576, 287–296.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. B., Buckley, J. S., McDougall, S. R., and Sorbie, K. S. 1998a. Core wettability: should IAH equal IUSBM? SCA-9809, proceedings of the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, The Hague.
Dixit, A. B., McDougall, S. R., and Sorbie, K. S. 1998b. A pore-level investigation of relative permeability hysteresis in water-wet systems. SPE Journal, 3(2), 115–123.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. B., Buckley, J. S., McDougall, S. R., and Sorbie, K. S. 2000. Empirical measures of wettability in porous media and the relationship between them derived from pore-scale modelling. Transport in Porous Media, 40(1), 27–54.Google Scholar
Donaldson, E. C., Thomas, R. D., and Lorenz, P. B. 1969. Wettability determination and its effect on recovery efficiency. SPE Journal, 9(1), 13–30.Google Scholar
Dong, H., and Blunt, M. J. 2009. Pore-network extraction from micro-computerized-tomography images. Physical Review E, 80(3), 036307.Google Scholar
Dong, M., Dullien, F. A. L., and Chatzis, I. 1995. Imbibition of oil in film form over water present in edges of capillaries with an angular cross section. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 172(1), 21–36.Google Scholar
Doster, F., Zegeling, P. A., and Hilfer, R. 2010. Numerical solutions of a generalized theory for macroscopic capillarity. Physical Review E, 81(3), 036307.Google Scholar
Doster, F., Hönig, O., and Hilfer, R. 2012. Horizontal flow and capillarity-driven redistribution in porous media. Physical Review E, 86(1), 016317.Google Scholar
Dria, D. E., Pope, G. A., and Sepehrnoori, K. 1993. Three-phase gas/oil/brine relative permeabilities measured under CO2 flooding conditions. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 8(2), 143–150.Google Scholar
Dullien, F. A. L. 1997. Porous Media: Fluid Transport and Pore Structure. Academic Press, San Diego. 2nd Edition.
Dullien, F. A. L, Zarcone, C., Macdonald, I. F., Collins, A., and Bochard, R. D. E. 1989. The effects of surface roughness on the capillary pressure curves and the heights of capillary rise in glass bead packs. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 127(2), 362–372.Google Scholar
Dumoré, J. M., and Schols, R. S. 1974. Drainage capillary-pressure functions and the influence of connate water. SPE Journal, 14(5), 437–444.Google Scholar
Durand, C., and Rosenberg, E. 1998. Fluid distribution in kaolinite- or illite-bearing cores: Cryo- SEM observations versus bulk measurements. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 19(1-2), 65–72.Google Scholar
Dussan, E. B. 1979. On the spreading of liquids on solid surfaces: static and dynamic contact lines. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 11(1), 371–400.Google Scholar
El-Maghraby, R. M. 2012. Measurements of CO2 Trapping in Carbonate and Sandstone Rocks. PhD thesis, Imperial College London.
El-Maghraby, R. M., and Blunt, M. J. 2013. Residual CO2 trapping in Indiana limestone. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(1), 227–233.Google Scholar
Eliassi, M., and Glass, R. J. 2001. On the continuum-scale modeling of gravity-driven fingers in unsaturated porous media: The inadequacy of the Richards Equation with standard monotonic constitutive relations and hysteretic equations of state. Water Resources Research, 37(8), 2019– 2035.Google Scholar
Eliassi, M., and Glass, R. J. 2002. On the porous-continuum modeling of gravity-driven fingers in unsaturated materials: Extension of standard theory with a hold-back-pile-up effect. Water Resources Research, 38(11), 1234.Google Scholar
Ewing, R. P., and Berkowitz, B. 2001. Stochastic pore-scale growth models of DNAPL migration in porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 24(3–4), 309–323.Google Scholar
Fatt, I. 1956a. The network model of porous media I. Capillary pressure characteristics. Petroleum Transactions of the AIME, 207, 144–159.Google Scholar
Fatt, I. 1956b. The network model of porous media II. Dynamic properties of a single size tube network. Petroleum Transactions of the AIME, 207, 160–163.Google Scholar
Fatt, I. 1956c. The network model of porous media III. Dynamic properties of networks with tube radius distribution. Petroleum Transactions of the AIME, 207, 164–181.Google Scholar
Fayers, F. J. 1989. Extension of Stone's method 1 and conditions for real characteristics in threephase flow. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 4(4), 437–445.Google Scholar
Fayers, F. J., and Matthews, J. D. 1984. Evaluation of normalized Stone's methods for estimating three-phase relative permeabilities. SPE Journal, 24(2), 224–232.Google Scholar
Feali, M., Pinczewski, W., Cinar, Y., Arns, C. H., Arns, J. Y., Francois, N., Turner, M. L., Senden, T., and Knackstedt, M. A. 2012. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the three-phase distribution of oil, water, and gas in Bentheimer sandstone by use of micro-CT imaging. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 15(6), 706–711.Google Scholar
Fenghour, A., Wakeham, W. A., and Vesovic, V. 1998. The viscosity of carbon dioxide. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 27(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
Fenwick, D. H., and Blunt, M. J. 1998a. Network modeling of three-phase flow in porous media. SPE Journal, 3(1), 86–96.Google Scholar
Fenwick, D. H., and Blunt, M. J. 1998b. Three-dimensional modeling of three phase imbibition and drainage. Advances in Water Resources, 21(2), 121–143.Google Scholar
Fernø, M. A., Torsvik, M., Haugland, S., and Graue, A. 2010. Dynamic laboratory wettability alteration. Energy & Fuels, 24(7), 3950–3958.Google Scholar
Ferrand, L. A., Milly, P. C. D., Pinder, G. F., and Turrin, R. P. 1990. A comparison of capillary pressure-saturation relations for drainage in two- and three-fluid porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 13(2), 54–63.Google Scholar
Ferrari, A., and Lunati, I. 2013. Direct numerical simulations of interface dynamics to link capillary pressure and total surface energy. Advances in Water Resources, 57, 19–31.Google Scholar
Ferréol, B., and Rothman, D. H. 1995. Lattice-Boltzmann simulations of flow through Fontainebleau sandstone. Transport in Porous Media, 20(1–2), 3–20.Google Scholar
Finney, J. L. 1970. Random packings and the structure of simple liquids. I. The geometry of random close packing. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 319(1539), 479–493.Google Scholar
Firincioglu, T., Blunt, M. J., and Zhou, D. 1999. Three-phase flow and wettability effects in triangular capillaries. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 155(2–3), 259–276.Google Scholar
Flannery, B. P., Deckman, H. W., Roberge, W. G., and D_Amico, K. L. 1987. Three-dimensional X-ray microtomography. Science, 237(4821), 1439–1444.Google Scholar
Fleury, M., Ringot, G., and Poulain, P. 2001. Positive imbibition capillary pressure curves using the centrifuge technique. Petrophysics, 42(4), 344–351.Google Scholar
Frette, V., Feder, J., Jøssang, T., and Meakin, P. 1992. Buoyancy-driven fluid migration in porous media. Physical Review Letters, 68(21), 3164–3167.Google Scholar
Frette, V., Feder, J., Jøssang, T., Meakin, P., and Måløy, K. J. 1994. Fast, immiscible fluid-fluid displacement in three-dimensional porous media at finite viscosity contrast. Physical Review E, 50(4), 2881–2890.Google Scholar
Furuberg, L., Måløy, K. J., and Feder, J. 1996. Intermittent behavior in slow drainage. Physical Review E, 53(1), 966–977.Google Scholar
Garcia, X., Akanji, L. T., Blunt, M. J., Matthai, S. K., and Latham, J. P. 2009. Numerical study of the effects of particle shape and polydispersity on permeability. Physical Review E, 80(2), 021304.Google Scholar
Gauglitz, P. A., and Radke, C. J. 1990. The dynamics of liquid film breakup in constricted cylindrical capillaries. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 134(1), 14–40.Google Scholar
Geistlinger, H., and Mohammadian, S. 2015. Capillary trapping mechanism in strongly water wet systems: Comparison between experiment and percolation theory. Advances in Water Resources, 79, 35–50.Google Scholar
Geistlinger, H., Ataei-Dadavi, I. ,Mohammadian, S., and Vogel, H. J. 2015. The impact of pore structure and surface roughness on capillary trapping for 2-D and 3-D-porous media: Comparison with percolation theory. Water Resources Research, 51(11), 9094–9111.Google Scholar
Geistlinger, H., Ataei-Dadavi, I., and Vogel, H. J. 2016. Impact of surface roughness on capillary trapping using 2D micromodel visualization experiments. Transport in Porous Media, 112(1), 207–227.Google Scholar
Georgiadis, A., Maitland, G., Trusler, J. P. M., and Bismarck, A. 2011. Interfacial tension measurements of the (H2O + n-Decane + CO2) ternary system at elevated pressures and temperatures. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 56(12), 4900–4908.Google Scholar
Georgiadis, A., Berg, S., Makurat, A., Maitland, G., and Ott, H. 2013. Pore-scale micro-computedtomography imaging: Nonwetting-phase cluster-size distribution during drainage and imbibition. Physical Review E, 88(3), 033002.Google Scholar
Geromichalos, D., Mugele, F., and Herminghaus, S. 2002. Nonlocal dynamics of spontaneous imbibition fronts. Physical Review Letters, 89(10), 104503.Google Scholar
Gharbi, O. 2014. Fluid-Rock Interactions in Carbonates: Applications to CO2 Storage. PhD thesis, Imperial College London.
Gharbi, O., and Blunt, M. J. 2012. The impact of wettability and connectivity on relative permeability in carbonates: A pore network modeling analysis. Water Resources Research, 48(12),W12513.Google Scholar
Glass, R. J., and Nicholl, M. J. 1996. Physics of gravity fingering of immiscible fluids within porous media: An overview of current understanding and selected complicating factors. Geoderma, 70(24), 133–163.Google Scholar
Glass, R. J., Steenhuis, T. S., and Parlange, J. Y. 1989a. Mechanism for finger persistence in homogeneous unsaturated porous media: Theory and verification. Soil Science, 148(1), 60–70.Google Scholar
Glass, R. J., Parlange, J. Y., and Steenhuis, T. S. 1989b. Wetting front instability: 1. Theoretical discussion and dimensional analysis. Water Resources Research, 25(6), 1187–1194.Google Scholar
Glass, R. J., Steenhuis, T. S., and Parlange, J. Y. 1989c. Wetting front instability: 2. Experimental determination of relationships between system parameters and two-dimensional unstable flow field behavior in initially dry porous media. Water Resources Research, 25(6), 1195–1207.Google Scholar
Goodyear, S. G., and Jones, P. I. R. 1993. Relative permeabilities for gravity stabilised gas injection. Proceedings of the 7th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Moscow.
Grader, A. S., and O_Meara, D. J. Jr. 1988. Dynamic Displacement Measurements of Three-Phase Relative Permeabilities Using Three Immiscible Liquids. SPE 18293, proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 2–5 October.
Grate, J. W., Dehoff, K. J., Warner, M. G., Pittman, J. W., Wietsma, T. W., Zhang, C., and Oostrom, M. 2012. Correlation of oil-water and air-water contact angles of diverse silanized surfaces and relationship to fluid interfacial tensions. Langmuir, 28(18), 7182–7188.Google Scholar
Graue, A., Viksund, B. G., Eilertsen, T., and Moe, R. 1999. Systematic wettability alteration by aging sandstone and carbonate rock in crude oil. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 24(2–4), 85–97.Google Scholar
Gray, W. G. 1983. General conservation equations for multi-phase systems: 4. Constitutive theory including phase change. Advances in Water Resources, 6(3), 130–140.Google Scholar
Gray, W. G., and Hassanizadeh, S. M. 1991. Unsaturated flow theory including interfacial phenomena. Water Resources Research, 27(8), 1855–1863.Google Scholar
Gray, W. G., and Hassanizadeh, S. M. 1998. Macroscale continuum mechanics for multiphase porous-media flow including phases, interfaces, common lines and common points. Advances in Water Resources, 21(4), 261–281.Google Scholar
Gray, W. G., and O_Neill, K. 1976. On the general equations for flow in porous media and their reduction to Darcy's Law. Water Resources Research, 12(2), 148–154.Google Scholar
Gray, W. G., Miller, C. T., and Schrefler, B. A. 2013. Averaging theory for description of environmental problems: What have we learned. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 123–138.Google Scholar
Groenzin, H., and Mullins, O. C. 2000. Molecular size and structure of asphaltenes from various sources. Energy & Fuels, 14(3), 677–684.Google Scholar
Gueyffier, D., Li, J., Nadim, A., Scardovelli, R., and Zaleski, S. 1999. Volume-of-fluid interface tracking with smoothed surface stress methods for three-dimensional flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 152(2), 423–456.Google Scholar
Guises, R., Xiang, J., Latham, J. P., and Munjiza, A. 2009. Granular packing: Numerical simulation and the characterisation of the effect of particle shape. Granular Matter, 11(5), 281–292.Google Scholar
Haines, W. B. 1930. Studies in the physical properties of soil. V. The hysteresis effect in capillary properties, and the modes of moisture distribution associated therewith. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 20(1), 97–116.Google Scholar
Hammervold, W. L, Knutsen, Ø., Iversen, J. E., and Skjæveland, S. M. 1998. Capillary pressure scanning curves by the micropore membrane technique. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 20(3–4), 253–258.Google Scholar
Hao, L., and Cheng, P. 2010. Pore-scale simulations on relative permeabilities of porous media by lattice Boltzmann method. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 53(9–10), 1908–1913.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. R., and Craighead, E. M. 1965. Aqueous displacement of oil. US Patent 3, 170, 514.
Hashemi, M., Sahimi, M., and Dabir, B. 1999. Monte Carlo simulation of two-phase flow in porous media: Invasion with two invaders and two defenders. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 267(1–2), 1–33.Google Scholar
Hassanizadeh, M., and Gray, W. G. 1979a. General conservation equations for multi-phase systems: 1. Averaging procedure. Advances in Water Resources, 2, 131–144.Google Scholar
Hassanizadeh, M., and Gray, W. G. 1979b. General conservation equations for multi-phase systems: 2. Mass, momenta, energy, and entropy equations. Advances in Water Resources, 2, 191–203.Google Scholar
Hassanizadeh, M., and Gray, W. G. 1980. General conservation equations for multi-phase systems: 3. Constitutive theory for porous media flow. Advances in Water Resources, 3(1), 25–40.Google Scholar
Hassanizadeh, S. M., and Gray, W. G. 1993a. Thermodynamic basis of capillary pressure in porous media. Water Resources Research, 29(10), 3389–3405.Google Scholar
Hassanizadeh, S. M., and Gray, W. G. 1993b. Toward an improved description of the physics of two-phase flow. Advances in Water Resources, 16(1), 53–67.Google Scholar
Hassanizadeh, S. M., Celia, M. A., and Dahle, H. K. 2002. Dynamic effect in the capillary pressuresaturation relationship and its impacts on unsaturated flow. Vadose Zone Journal, 1(1), 38–57.Google Scholar
Hassenkam, T., Skovbjerg, L. L., and Stipp, S. L. S. 2009. Probing the intrinsically oil-wet surfaces of pores in North Sea chalk at subpore resolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(15), 6071–6076.Google Scholar
Haugen, Å., Fernø, M. A., Mason, G., and Morrow, N. R. 2014. Capillary pressure and relative permeability estimated from a single spontaneous imbibition test. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 115, 66–77.Google Scholar
Hazen, A. 1892. Some physical properties of sands and gravels, with special reference to their use in filtration. 24th Annual Report, Massachusetts State Board of Health, Pub. Doc. No. 34.
Hazlett, R. D. 1993. On surface roughness effects in wetting phenomena. VSP, Utrecht, the Netherlands. In: Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Ed. Mittal, K. L. Pages 173–181.
Hazlett, R. D. 1995. Simulation of capillary-dominated displacements in microtomographic images of reservoir rocks. Transport in Porous Media, 20(1–2), 21–35.Google Scholar
Hazlett, R. D. 1997. Statistical characterization and stochastic modeling of pore networks in relation to fluid flow. Mathematical Geology, 29(6), 801–822.Google Scholar
Heiba, A. A., Davis, H. T., and Scriven, L. E. 1984. Statistical Network Theory of Three-Phase Relative Permeabilities. SPE 12690, proceedings of the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 15–18 April.
Helland, J. O., and Skjæveland, S. M. 2006a. Physically based capillary pressure correlation for mixed-wet reservoirs from a bundle-of-tubes model. SPE Journal, 11(2), 171–180.Google Scholar
Helland, J. O., and Skjæveland, S. M. 2006b. Three-phase mixed-wet capillary pressure curves from a bundle of triangular tubes model. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 52(1–4), 100–130.Google Scholar
Helland, J. O., and Skjæveland, S. M. 2007. Relationship between capillary pressure, saturation, and interfacial area from a model of mixed-wet triangular tubes. Water Resources Research, 43(12), W12S10.Google Scholar
Helmig, R. ,Weiss, A., and Wohlmuth, B. I. 2007. Dynamic capillary effects in heterogeneous porous media. Computational Geosciences, 11(3), 261–274.Google Scholar
Herring, A. L., Harper, E. J., Andersson, L., Sheppard, A., Bay, B. K., and Wildenschild, D. 2013. Effect of fluid topology on residual nonwetting phase trapping: Implications for geologic CO2 sequestration. Advances in Water Resources, 62, 47–58.Google Scholar
Herring, A. L., Andersson, L., Schlüter, S., Sheppard, A., and Wildenschild, D. 2015. Efficiently engineering pore-scale processes: The role of force dominance and topology during nonwetting phase trapping in porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 79, 91–102.Google Scholar
Herring, A. L., Sheppard, A., Andersson, L., and Wildenschild, D. 2016. Impact of wettability alteration on 3D nonwetting phase trapping and transport. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 46, 175–186.Google Scholar
Hilfer, R. 1991. Geometric and dielectric characterization of porous media. Physical Review B, 44(1), 60–75.Google Scholar
Hilfer, R. 2002. Review on scale dependent characterization of the microstructure of porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 46(2–3), 373–390.Google Scholar
Hilfer, R. 2006a. Capillary pressure, hysteresis and residual saturation in porous media. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 359, 119–128.Google Scholar
Hilfer, R. 2006b. Macroscopic capillarity and hysteresis for flow in porous media. Physical Review E, 73(1), 016307.Google Scholar
Hilfer, R., and Lemmer, A. 2015. Differential porosimetry and permeametry for random porous media. Physical Review E, 92(1), 013305.Google Scholar
Hilfer, R., and Øren, P. E. 1996. Dimensional analysis of pore scale and field scale immiscible displacement. Transport in Porous Media, 22(1), 53–72.Google Scholar
Hilfer, R., and Steinle, R. 2014. Saturation overshoot and hysteresis for twophase flow in porous media. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 223(11), 2323–2338.Google Scholar
Hilfer, R., and Zauner, Th. 2011. High-precision synthetic computed tomography of reconstructed porous media. Physical Review E, 84(6), 062301.Google Scholar
Hilfer, R., Armstrong, R. T., Berg, S., Georgiadis, A., and Ott, H. 2015a. Capillary saturation and desaturation. Physical Review E, 92(6), 063023.Google Scholar
Hilfer, R., Zauner, T., Lemmer, A., and Biswal, B. 2015b. Institute for Computational Physics, http://www.icp.uni-stuttgart.de/microct/.
Hill, S. 1952. Channeling in packed columns. Chemical Engineering Science, 1(6), 247–253.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. 2012. Velocity-dependent capillary pressure in theory for variably-saturated liquid infiltration into porous media. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(6), L06402.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M., and Miller, C. T. 2001. Pore-morphology-based simulation of drainage in totally wetting porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 24(3–4), 243–255.Google Scholar
Hiorth, A., Cathles, L. M., and Madland, M. V. 2010. The impact of pore water chemistry on carbonate surface charge and oil wettability. Transport in Porous Media, 85(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Hirasaki, G. J. 1991.Wettability: Fundamentals and surface forces. SPE Formation Evaluation, 6(2), 217–226.Google Scholar
Hirasaki, G. J. 1993. Structural interactions in the wetting and spreading of van der Waals fluids. VSP, Utrecht, the Netherlands. In: Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Ed. Mittal, K. L. Pages 183–220.
Hirasaki, G. J., Rohan, J. A., Dubey, S. T., and Niko, H. 1990. Wettability evaluation during restored state core analysis. SPE 20506, proceedings of the Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the SPE, New Orleans, September 23–26.
Hirt, C. W., and Nichols, B. D. 1981. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 39(1), 201–225.Google Scholar
Holmgren, C. R., and Morse, R. A. 1951. Effect of free gas saturation on oil recovery by water flooding. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 3(5), 135–140.Google Scholar
Holtzman, R., and Segre, E. 2015. Wettability stabilizes fluid invasion into porous media via nonlocal, cooperative pore filling. Physical Review Letters, 115(16), 164501.Google Scholar
Homsy, G. M. 1987. Viscous fingering in porous media. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 19(1), 271–311.Google Scholar
Honarpour, M. M., Koederitz, F., and Herbert, A. 1986. Relative Permeability of Petroleum Reservoirs. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
Hoshen, J., and Kopelman, R. 1976. Percolation and cluster distribution. I. Cluster multiple labeling technique and critical concentration algorithm. Physical Review B, 14(8), 3438–3445.Google Scholar
Huang, H., Meakin, P., and Liu, M. B. 2005. Computer simulation of two-phase immiscible fluid motion in unsaturated complex fractures using a volume of fluid method. Water Resources Research, 41(12), W12413.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. G., and Blunt, M. J. 2000. Pore scale modeling of rate effects in imbibition. Transport in Porous Media, 40(3), 295–322.Google Scholar
Hui, M. H., and Blunt, M. J. 2000. Effects of wettability on three-phase flow in porous media. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 104(16), 3833–3845.Google Scholar
Humphry, K. J., Suijkerbuijk, B. M. J. M., van der Linde, H. A., Pieterse, S. G. J., and Masalmeh, S. K. 2013. Impact of wettability on residual oil saturation and capillary desaturation curves. SCA2013-025, proceedings of Society of Core Analysts Annual Meeting, Napa Valley, California.
Hunt, A., and Ewing, R. 2009. Percolation Theory for Flow in Porous Media. Vol. 771. Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
Hunt, A. G. 2001. Applications of percolation theory to porous media with distributed local conductances. Advances in Water Resources, 24(3), 279–307.Google Scholar
Idowu, N., Long, H., Øren, P. E., Carnerup, A. M., Fogden, A., Bondino, I., and Sundal, L. 2015. Wettability analysis using micro-CT, FESEM and QEMSCAN and its applications to digital rock physics. SCA2015-010, proceedings of the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, St. Johns Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, 16–21 August.
Idowu, N. A., and Blunt, M. J. 2010. Pore-scale modelling of rate effects in waterflooding. Transport in Porous Media, 83(1), 151–169.Google Scholar
Iglauer, S., Favretto, S., Spinelli, G., Schena, G., and Blunt, M. J. 2010. X-ray tomography measurements of power-law cluster size distributions for the nonwetting phase in sandstones. Physical Review E, 82(5), 056315.Google Scholar
Iglauer, S., Paluszny, A., Pentland, C. H, and Blunt, M. J. 2011. Residual CO2 imaged with X-ray micro-tomography. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(21), L21403.Google Scholar
Iglauer, S., Fernø, M. A., Shearing, P., and Blunt, M. J. 2012. Comparison of residual oil cluster size distribution, morphology and saturation in oil-wet and water-wet sandstone. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 375(1), 187–192.Google Scholar
Iglauer, S., Paluszny, A., and Blunt, M. J. 2013. Simultaneous oil recovery and residual gas storage: A pore-level analysis using in situ X-ray micro-tomography. Fuel, 103, 905–914.Google Scholar
Iglauer, S., Pentland, C. H., and Busch, A. 2015. CO2 wettability of seal and reservoir rocks and the implications for carbon geo-sequestration. Water Resources Research, 51(1), 729–774.Google Scholar
Inamuro, T., Ogata, T., Tajima, S., and Konishi, N. 2004. A lattice Boltzmann method for incompressible two-phase flows with large density differences. Journal of Computational Physics, 198(2), 628–644.Google Scholar
Issa, R. I. 1986. Solution of the implicitly discretized fluid flow equations by operator-splitting. Journal of Computational Physics, 62(1), 40–65.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. D., and Vinogradov, J. 2012. Impact of wettability on laboratory measurements of streaming potential in carbonates. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 393, 86–95.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. D., Valvatne, P. H., and Blunt, M. J. 2003. Prediction of wettability variation and its impact on flow using pore- to reservoir-scale simulations. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 39(3–4), 231–246.Google Scholar
Jadhunandan, P. P., and Morrow, N. R. 1995. Effect of wettability on waterflood recovery for crudeoil/brine/rock systems. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 10(1), 40–46.Google Scholar
Jain, V., Bryant, S., and Sharma, M. 2003. Influence of wettability and saturation on liquid-liquid interfacial area in porous media. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(3), 584–591.Google Scholar
Jerauld, G. R. 1997. General three-phase relative permeability model for Prudhoe Bay. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 12(4), 255–263.Google Scholar
Jerauld, G. R., and Rathmell, J. J. 1997.Wettability and relative permeability of Prudhoe Bay: A case study in mixed-wet reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 12(1), 58–65.
Jerauld, G. R., and Salter, S. J. 1990. The effect of pore-structure on hysteresis in relative permeability and capillary pressure: Pore-level modeling. Transport in Porous Media, 5(2), 103–151.Google Scholar
Jerauld, G. R., Scriven, L. E., and Davis, H. T. 1984. Percolation and conduction on the 3D Voronoi and regular networks: A second case study in topological disorder. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 17(19), 3429–3439.Google Scholar
Jettestuen, E., Helland, J. O., and Prodanovíc, M. 2013. A level set method for simulating capillarycontrolled displacements at the pore scale with nonzero contact angles. Water Resources Research, 49(8), 4645–4661.Google Scholar
Jha, B., Cueto-Felgueroso, L., and Juanes, R. 2011. Fluid mixing from viscous fingering. Physical Review Letters, 106(19), 194502.Google Scholar
Jiang, F., Oliveira, M. S. A., and Sousa, A. C. M. 2007a. Mesoscale SPH modeling of fluid flow in isotropic porous media. Computer Physics Communications, 176(7), 471–480.Google Scholar
Jiang, Z., Wu, K., Couples, G., van Dijke, M. I. J., Sorbie, K. S., and Ma, J. 2007b. Efficient extraction of networks from three-dimensional porous media. Water Resources Research, 43(12). W12S03.Google Scholar
Jiang, Z., van Dijke, M. I. J., Sorbie, K. S., and Couples, G. D. 2007c. Representation of multiscale heterogeneity via multiscale pore networks. Water Resources Research, 49(9), 5437–5449.Google Scholar
Jiang, Z., van Dijke, M. I. J., Wu, K., Couples, G. D., Sorbie, K. S., and Ma, J. 2012. Stochastic pore network generation from 3D rock images. Transport in Porous Media, 94(2), 571–593.Google Scholar
Jin, C., Langston, P. A., Pavlovskaya, G. E., Hall, M. R., and Rigby, S. P. 2016. Statistics of highly heterogeneous flow fields confined to three-dimensional random porous media. Physical Review E, 93(1), 013122.Google Scholar
Joekar-Niasar, V., and Hassanizadeh, S. M. 2011. Effect of fluids properties on non-equilibrium capillarity effects: Dynamic pore-network modeling. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 37(2), 198–214.Google Scholar
Joekar-Niasar, V., and Hassanizadeh, S. M. 2012. Analysis of fundamentals of two-phase flow in porous media using dynamic pore-network models: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 42(18), 1895–1976.Google Scholar
Johannesen, E. B., and Graue, A. 2007. Mobilization of remaining oil – emphasis on capillary number and wettability. SPE 108724, proceedings of the International Oil Conference and Exhibition, Mexico, 27–30 June.
Johns, M. L., and Gladden, L. F. 2001. Surface-to-volume ratio of ganglia trapped in small-pore systems determined by pulsed-field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 238(1), 96–104.Google Scholar
Juanes, R., Spiteri, E. J., Orr, F. M., and Blunt, M. J. 2006. Impact of relative permeability hysteresis on geological CO2 storage.Water Resources Research, 42(12), W12418.Google Scholar
Kainourgiakis, M. E., S., Kikkinides E., A., Galani, C., Charalambopoulou, G., and K., Stubos A. 2005. Digitally reconstructed porous media: Transport and sorption properties. Transport in Porous Media, 58(1–2), 43–62.Google Scholar
Kalaydjian, F. 1990. Origin and quantification of coupling between relative permeabilities for twophase flows in porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 5(3), 215–229.Google Scholar
Kalaydjian, F. J. M., Moulu, J. C., Vizika, O., and Munkerud, P. K. 1997. Three-phase flow in waterwet porous media: Gas/oil relative permeabilities for various spreading conditions. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 17(3–4), 275–290.Google Scholar
Kang, Q., Lichtner, P. C., and Zhang, D. 2006. Lattice Boltzmann pore-scale model for multicomponent reactive transport in porous media. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 111(B5), B05203.Google Scholar
Kantzas, A., Chatzis, I., and Dullien, F. A. L. 1988. Mechanisms of capillary displacement of residual oil by gravity-assisted inert gas injection. SPE 17506, proceedings of the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, Wyoming, 11–13 May.
Karabakal, U., and Bagci, S. 2004. Determination of wettability and its effect on waterflood performance in limestone medium. Energy & Fuels, 18(2), 438–449.Google Scholar
Karpyn, Z. T., Piri, M., and Singh, G. 2010. Experimental investigation of trapped oil clusters in a water-wet bead pack using X-ray microtomography. Water Resources Research, 46(4), W04510.Google Scholar
Kazemifar, F., Blois, G., Kyritsis, D. C., and Christensen, K. T. 2016. Quantifying the flow dynamics of supercritical CO2-water displacement in a 2D porous micromodel using fluorescent microscopy and microscopic PIV. Advances in Water Resources, 95, 325–368.Google Scholar
Keehm, Y. ,Mukerji, T., and Nur, A. 2004. Permeability prediction from thin sections: 3D reconstruction and Lattice-Boltzmann flow simulation. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(4), L04606.Google Scholar
Keller, A. A., Blunt, M. J., and Roberts, P. V. 1997. Micromodel observation of the role of oil layers in three-phase flow. Transport in Porous Media, 26(3), 277–297.Google Scholar
Kianinejad, A., and DiCarlo, D. A. 2016. Three-phase relative permeability in water-wet media: A comprehensive study. Transport in Porous Media, 112(3), 665–687.Google Scholar
Kianinejad, A., Chen, X., and DiCarlo, D. A. 2015. The effect of saturation path on three-phase relative permeability. Water Resources Research, 51(11), 9141–9164.Google Scholar
Killins, C. R., Nielsen, R. F., and Calhoun, J. C. 1953. Capillary desaturation and imbibition in porous rocks. Producers Monthly, 18(2), 30–39.Google Scholar
Killough, J. E. 1976. Reservoir simulation with history-dependent saturation functions. SPE Journal, 16(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
Kim, H., Rao, P. S. C., and Annable, M. D. 1997. Determination of effective air-water interfacial area in partially saturated porous media using surfactant adsorption.Water Resources Research, 33(12), 2705–2711.Google Scholar
Kimbrel, E. H., Herring, A. L., Armstrong, R. T., Lunati, I., Bay, B. K., and Wildenschild, D. 2015. Experimental characterization of nonwetting phase trapping and implications for geologic CO2 sequestration. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 42, 1–15.Google Scholar
Klise, K. A., Moriarty, D., Yoon, H., and Karpyn, Z. 2016. Automated contact angle estimation for three-dimensional X-ray microtomography data. Advances in Water Resources, 95, 152–160.Google Scholar
Kneafsey, T. J., Silin, D., and Ajo-Franklin, J. B. 2013. Supercritical CO2 flow through a layered silica sand/calcite sand system: Experiment and modified maximal inscribed spheres analysis. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 14, 141–150.Google Scholar
Knudsen, H. A., and Hansen, A. 2006. Two-phase flow in porous media: Dynamical phase transition. The European Physical Journal B–Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 49(1), 109–118.Google Scholar
Knudsen, H. A., Aker, E., and Hansen, A. 2002. Bulk flow regimes and fractional flow in 2D porous media by numerical simulations. Transport in Porous Media, 47(1), 99–121.Google Scholar
Koiller, B., Ji, H., and Robbins, M. O. 1992. Fluid wetting properties and the invasion of square networks. Physical Review B, 45(14), 7762–7767.Google Scholar
Koroteev, D., Dinariev, O., Evseev, N., Klemin, D., Nadeev, A., Safonov, S., Gurpinar, O., Berg, S., van Kruijsdijk, C., and Armstrong, R. 2014. Direct hydrodynamic simulation of multiphase flow in porous rock. Petrophysics, 55(4), 294–303.Google Scholar
Koval, E. J. 1963. A method for predicting the performance of unstable miscible displacements in heterogeneous media. Petroleum Transactions of the AIME, 228(2), 143–150.Google Scholar
Kovscek, A. R., and Radke, C. J. 1996. Gas bubble snap-off under pressure-driven flow in constricted noncircular capillaries. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 117(1–2), 55–76.Google Scholar
Kovscek, A. R., Wong, H., and Radke, C. J. 1993. A pore-level scenario for the development of mixed wettability in oil reservoirs. AIChE Journal, 39(6), 1072–1085.Google Scholar
Kozeny, J. 1927. Über kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden. Proceedings of the Royal Academy of Sciences, Vienna, 136(2a), 271–280.Google Scholar
Krevor, S., Blunt, M. J., Benson, S. M., Pentland, C. H., Reynolds, C., Al-Menhali, A., and Niu, B. 2015. Capillary trapping for geologic carbon dioxide storage – From pore scale physics to field scale implications. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40, 221–237.Google Scholar
Krummel, A. T., Datta, S. S., Münster, S., and Weitz, D. A. 2013. Visualizing multiphase flow and trapped fluid configurations in a model three-dimensional porous medium. AIChE Journal, 59(3), 1022–1029.Google Scholar
Kumar, M., Senden, T., Knackstedt, M. A, Latham, S. J., Pinczewski, V., Sok, R. M, Sheppard, A. P, and Turner, M. L. 2009. Imaging of pore scale distribution of fluids and wettability. Petrophysics, 50(4), 311–323.Google Scholar
Kyte, J. R., Stanclift, R. J. Jr., Stephan, S. C. Jr., and Rapoport, L. A. 1956. Mechanism of water flooding in the presence of free gas. Petroleum Transactions of the AIME, 207, 215–221.Google Scholar
Lago, M., and Araujo, M. 2001. Threshold pressure in capillaries with polygonal cross section. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 243(1), 219–226.Google Scholar
Lake, L. W. 1989. Enhanced Oil Recovery. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Land, C. S. 1968. Calculation of imbibition relative permeability for two- and three-phase flow from rock properties. SPE Journal, 8(2), 149–156.Google Scholar
Laplace, P. S. 1805. Traite de Mecanique Celeste (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1839), suppl. au livre X, 1805 and 1806, resp. Oeuvres compl, 4.Google Scholar
Larsen, J. A., and Skauge, A. 1998. Methodology for numerical simulation with cycle-dependent relative permeabilities. SPE Journal, 3(2), 163–173.Google Scholar
Larson, R. G., Scriven, L. E., and Davis, H. T. 1981. Percolation theory of two phase flow in porous media. Chemical Engineering Science, 36(1), 57–73.Google Scholar
Latham, S., Varslot, T., and Sheppard, A. 2008. Image Registration: Enhancing and Calibrating X-Ray Micro-CT Imaging. SCA2008-35, proceedings of the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Abu Dhabi, 29 October–2 November.
Latief, F. D. E., Biswal, B., Fauzi, U., and Hilfer, R. 2010. Continuum reconstruction of the pore scale microstructure for Fontainebleau sandstone. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 389(8), 1607–1618.Google Scholar
Lee, S. I., Song, Y. and Noh, T. W., Chen, X. D., and Gaines, J. R. 1986. Experimental observation of nonuniversal behavior of the conductivity exponent for three-dimensional continuum percolation systems. Physical Review B, 34(10), 6719–6724.Google Scholar
Lemaitre, R., and Adler, P. M. 1990. Fractal porous media IV: Three-dimensional stokes flow through random media and regular fractals. Transport in Porous Media, 5(4), 325–340.Google Scholar
Lenhard, R. J., and Parker, J. C. 1987. Measurement and prediction of saturation-pressure relationships in three-phase porous media systems. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1(4), 407–424.Google Scholar
Lenormand, R. 1990. Liquids in porous media. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2(S), SA79–SA88.Google Scholar
Lenormand, R., and Bories, S. 1980. Description d'un mecanisme de connexion de liaision destine a l'etude du drainage avec piegeage en milieu poreux. CR Acad. Sci, 291, 279–282.Google Scholar
Lenormand, R., and Zarcone, C. 1984. Role of roughness and edges during imbibition in square capillaries. SPE 13264, proceedings of the 59th SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 16–19 September.
Lenormand, R., and Zarcone, C. 1985. Invasion percolation in an etched network: Measurement of a fractal dimension. Physical Review Letters, 54(20), 2226–2229.Google Scholar
Lenormand, R., Zarcone, C., and Sarr, A. 1983. Mechanisms of the displacement of one fluid by another in a network of capillary ducts. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 135, 337–353.Google Scholar
Lenormand, R., E., Touboul, and Zarcone, C. 1988. Numerical models and experiments on immiscible displacements in porous media. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 189, 165–187.Google Scholar
Lerdahl, T. R., Øren, P. E., and Bakke, S. 2000. A Predictive Network Model for Three-Phase Flow in Porous Media. SPE 59311, proceedings of the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 3–5 April.
Leverett, M. C. 1939. Flow of oil-water mixtures through unconsolidated sands. Petroleum Transactions of the AIME, 132(1), 150–172.Google Scholar
Leverett, M. C. 1941. Capillary behavior in porous sands. Petroleum Transactions of the AIME, 142(1), 152–169.Google Scholar
Leverett, M. C. 1987. Trends and needs in reactor safety improvement. Pages 219–227 of: Lave, L. B. (ed), Risk Assessment and Management. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol. 5. Springer US.
Leverett, M. C., and Lewis, W. B. 1941. Steady flow of gas-oil-water mixtures through unconsolidated sands. Petroleum Transactions of the AIME, 142(1), 107–116.Google Scholar
Li, H., Pan, C., and Miller, C. T. 2005. Pore-scale investigation of viscous coupling effects for twophase flow in porous media. Physical Review E, 72(2), 026705.Google Scholar
Lindquist, W. B., Lee, S. M., Coker, D. A., Jones, K. W., and Spanne, P. 1996. Medial axis analysis of void structure in three-dimensional tomographic images of porous media. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 101(B4), 8297–8310.Google Scholar
Liu, H., Krishnan, S. ,Marella, S., and Udaykumar, H. S. 2005. Sharp interface Cartesian grid method II: A technique for simulating droplet interactions with surfaces of arbitrary shape. Journal of Computational Physics, 210(1), 32–54.Google Scholar
Liu, M. B., and Liu, G. R. 2010. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): An overview and recent developments. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 17(1), 25–76.Google Scholar
Longeron, D., Hammervold, W. L., and Skjæveland, S. M. 1994. Water-oil capillary pressure and wettability measurements using micropore membrane technique. SCA9426, proceedings of the Society of Core Analysts International Symposium, Stavanger, Norway, September 12–14.
Lorenz, C. D., and Ziff, R. M. 1998. Precise determination of the bond percolation thresholds and finite-size scaling corrections for the sc, fcc, and bcc lattices. Physical Review E, 57(1), 230– 236.Google Scholar
Løvoll, G., Méheust, Y., Måløy, K. J., Aker, E., and Schmittbuhl, J. 2005. Competition of gravity, capillary and viscous forces during drainage in a two-dimensional porous medium, a pore scale study. Energy, 30(6), 861–872.Google Scholar
Ma, S., Mason, G., and Morrow, N. R. 1996. Effect of contact angle on drainage and imbibition in regular polygonal tubes. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 117(3), 273–291.Google Scholar
Mani, V., and Mohanty, K. K. 1997. Effect of the spreading coefficient on three-phase flow in porous media. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 187(1), 45–56.Google Scholar
Manthey, S., Hassanizadeh, S. M., Helmig, R., and Hilfer, R. 2008. Dimensional analysis of twophase flow including a rate-dependent capillary pressure-saturation relationship. Advances in Water Resources, 31(9), 1137–1150.Google Scholar
Manwart, C., Torquato, S., and Hilfer, R. 2000. Stochastic reconstruction of sandstones. Physical Review E, 62(1), 893–899.Google Scholar
Manwart, C., Aaltosalmi, U., Koponen, A., Hilfer, R., and Timonen, J. 2002. Lattice-Boltzmann and finite-difference simulations for the permeability for three-dimensional porous media. Physical Review E, 66(1), 016702.Google Scholar
Martys, N., Cieplak, M., and Robbins, M. O. 1991a. Critical phenomena in fluid invasion of porous media. Physical Review Letters, 66(8), 1058–1061.Google Scholar
Martys, N., Robbins, M. O., and Cieplak, M. 1991b. Scaling relations for interface motion through disordered media: Application to two-dimensional fluid invasion. Physical Review B, 44(22), 12294–12306.Google Scholar
Martys, N. S., and Chen, H. 1996. Simulation of multicomponent fluids in complex threedimensional geometries by the lattice Boltzmann method. Physical Review E, 53(1), 743–750.Google Scholar
Masalmeh, S. K. 2002. The effect of wettability on saturation functions and impact on carbonate reservoirs in the Middle East. SPE 78517, proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Masalmeh, S. K, and Oedai, S. 2000. Oil mobility in the transition zone. SCA 2000-02, proceedings of Society of Core Analysts Annual Meeting, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Mason, G., and Morrow, N. R. 1984. Meniscus curvatures in capillaries of uniform cross-section. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1: Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases, 80(9), 2375–2393.Google Scholar
Mason, G., and Morrow, N. R. 1991. Capillary behavior of a perfectly wetting liquid in irregular triangular tubes. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 141(1), 262–274.Google Scholar
Mason, G., and Morrow, N. R. 2013. Developments in spontaneous imbibition and possibilities for future work. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 110, 268–293.Google Scholar
Masson, Y., and Pride, S. R. 2014. A fast algorithm for invasion percolation. Transport in Porous Media, 102(2), 301–312.Google Scholar
Matubayasi, N., Motomura, K., Kaneshina, S., Nakamura, M., and Matuura, R. 1977. Effect of pressure on interfacial tension between oil and water. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 50(2), 523–524.Google Scholar
Mayer, A. S., and Miller, C. T. 1993. An experimental investigation of pore-scale distributions of nonaqueous phase liquids at residual saturation. Transport in Porous Media, 10(1), 57–80.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. P., and Stowe, R. A. 1965. Mercury porosimetry-breakthrough pressure for penetration between packed spheres. Journal of Colloid Science, 20(8), 893–911.Google Scholar
McDougall, S. R., and Sorbie, K. S. 1995. The impact of wettability on waterflooding: Pore-scale simulation. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 10(3), 208–213.Google Scholar
McWhorter, D. B. 1971. Infiltration affected by flow of air. Hydrology Papers, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 49.Google Scholar
McWhorter, D. B., and Sunada, D. K. 1990. Exact integral solutions for two-phase flow. Water Resources Research, 26(3), 399–413.Google Scholar
Meakin, P. 1993. The growth of rough surfaces and interfaces. Physics Reports, 235(4–5), 189–289.Google Scholar
Meakin, P., and Tartakovsky, A. M. 2009. Modeling and simulation of pore-scale multiphase fluid flow and reactive transport in fractured and porous media. Reviews of Geophysics, 47(3), RG3002.Google Scholar
Meakin, P., Feder, J., Frette, V., and Jøssang, T. 1992. Invasion percolation in a destabilizing gradient. Physical Review A, 46(6), 3357–3368.Google Scholar
Meakin, P., Wagner, G., Vedvik, A., Amundsen, H., Feder, J., and Jøssang, T. 2000. Invasion percolation and secondary migration: Experiments and simulations. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 17(7), 777–795.Google Scholar
Mecke, K., and Arns, C. H. 2005. Fluids in porous media: A morphometric approach. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 17(9), S503–S534.Google Scholar
Mehmani, A., and Prodanovíc, M. 2014a. The application of sorption hysteresis in nano-petrophysics using multiscale multiphysics network models. International Journal of Coal Geology, 128–129, 96–108.Google Scholar
Mehmani, A., and Prodanovíc, M. 2014b. The effect of microporosity on transport properties in porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 63, 104–119.Google Scholar
Miller, C. T., Christakos, G., Imhoff, P. T., McBride, J. F., Pedit, J. A., and Trangenstein, J. A. 1998. Multiphase flow and transport modeling in heterogeneous porous media: Challenges and approaches. Advances in Water Resources, 21(2), 77–120.Google Scholar
Mogensen, K., and Stenby, E. H. 1998. A dynamic two-phase pore-scale model of imbibition. Transport in Porous Media, 32(3), 299–327.Google Scholar
Mohammadian, S., Geistlinger, H., and Vogel, H. J. 2015. Quantification of gas-phase trapping within the capillary fringe using computed microtomography. Vadose Zone Journal, 14(5). 10.2136/vzj2014.06.0063.Google Scholar
Mohanty, K. K., Davis, H. T., and Scriven, L. E. 1987. Physics of oil entrapment in water-wet rock. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 2(1), 113–128.Google Scholar
Morrow, N., and Buckley, J. 2011. Improved oil recovery by low-salinity waterflooding. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 63(5), 106–112.Google Scholar
Morrow, N. R. 1970. Physics and thermodynamics of capillary action in porous media. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 62(6), 32–56.Google Scholar
Morrow, N. R. 1976. Capillary pressure correlations for uniformaly wetted porous media. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 15(4), 49–69.Google Scholar
Morrow, N. R. 1990. Wettability and its effect on oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 42(12), 1476–1484.Google Scholar
Morrow, N. R., and Mason, G. 2001. Recovery of oil by spontaneous imbibition. Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science, 6(4), 321–337.Google Scholar
Morrow, N. R., Chatzis, I., and Taber, J. J. 1988. Entrapment and mobilization of residual oil in bead packs. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 3(3), 927–934.Google Scholar
Mostaghimi, P., Bijeljic, B., and Blunt, M. J. 2012. Simulation of flow and dispersion on pore-space images. SPE Journal, 17(4), 1131–1141.Google Scholar
Mostaghimi, P., Blunt, M. J., and Bijeljic, B. 2013. Computations of absolute permeability on micro- CT images. Mathematical Geosciences, 45(1), 103–125.Google Scholar
Mousavi, M., Prodanovíc, M., and Jacobi, D. 2012. New classification of carbonate rocks for processbased pore scale modeling. SPE Journal, 18(2), 243–263.Google Scholar
Mualem, Y. 1976. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research, 12(3), 513–522.Google Scholar
Muljadi, B. P., Blunt, M. J., Raeini, A. Q., and Bijeljic, B. 2016. The impact of porous media heterogeneity on non-Darcy flow behaviour from pore-scale simulation. Advances in Water Resources, 95, 329–340.Google Scholar
Murison, J., Semin, B., Baret, J. C. Herminghaus, S., Schröter, M., and Brinkmann, M. 2014. Wetting heterogeneities in porous media control flow dissipation. Physical Review Applied, 2(3), 034002.Google Scholar
Muskat, M. 1949. Physical Principles of Oil Production. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Muskat, M., and Meres, M.W. 1936. The flow of heterogeneous fluids through porous media. Journal of Applied Physics, 7, 346–363.Google Scholar
Navier, C. L. M. H. 1823. Mémoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluides. Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences de l'Institut de France, 6, 389–416.Google Scholar
Neto, C., Evans, D. R., Bonaccurso, E., Butt, H. J., and Craig, V. S. J. 2005. Boundary slip in Newtonian liquids: A review of experimental studies. Reports on Progress in Physics, 68(12), 2859–2897.Google Scholar
Ngan, C. G., and Dussan, V. E. B. 1989. On the dynamics of liquid spreading on solid surfaces. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 209, 191–226.Google Scholar
Nguyen, V. H., Sheppard, A. P., Knackstedt, M. A., and Pinczewski, W. V. 2006. The effect of displacement rate on imbibition relative permeability and residual saturation. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 52(1–4), 54–70.Google Scholar
Niessner, J., Berg, S., and Hassanizadeh, S. M. 2011. Comparison of two-phase Darcy's law with a thermodynamically consistent approach. Transport in Porous Media, 88(1), 133– 148.Google Scholar
Niu, B., Al-Menhali, A., and Krevor, S. C. 2015. The impact of reservoir conditions on the residual trapping of carbon dioxide in Berea sandstone. Water Resources Research, 51(4), 2009–2029.Google Scholar
Nono, F., Bertin, H., and Hamon, G. 2014. Oil recovery in the transition zone of carbonate reservoirs with wettability change: hysteresis models of relative permeability versus experimental data. SCA2014-007, proceedings of Society of Core Analysts Annual Meeting, Avignon, France.
Nordhaug, H. F., Celia, M., and Dahle, H. K. 2003. A pore network model for calculation of interfacial velocities. Advances in Water Resources, 26(10), 1061–1074.Google Scholar
Nutting, P. G. 1930. Physical analysis of oil sands. AAPG Bulletin, 14(10), 1337–1349.Google Scholar
Oak, M. J. 1991. Three-Phase Relative Permeability of Intermediate-Wet Berea Sandstone. SPE 22599, proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 6–9 October.
Oak, M. J., and Baker, L. E. 1990. Three-phase relative permeability of Berea sandstone. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 42(8), 1054–1061.Google Scholar
Odeh, A. S. 1959. Effect of viscosity ratio on relative permeability. Petroleum Transactions of the AIME, 216, 346–353.Google Scholar
Okabe, H., and Blunt, M. J. 2004. Prediction of permeability for porous media reconstructed using multiple-point statistics. Physical Review E, 70(6), 066135.Google Scholar
Okabe, H., and Blunt, M. J. 2005. Pore space reconstruction using multiple-point statistics. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 46(1–2), 121–137.Google Scholar
Okasha, T. M., Funk, J. J., and Rashidi, H. N. 2007. Fifty years of wettability measurements in the Arab-D carbonate reservoir. SPE 105114, proceedings of the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain, 11–14 March.
Open FOAM. 2010. OpenFOAM Programmers guide, http://foam.sourceforge.net/doc/Guides-a4/ProgrammersGuide.pdf. OpenCFD Limited.
Or, D., and Tuller, M. 1999. Liquid retention and interfacial area in variably saturated porous media: Upscaling from single-pore to sample-scale model. Water Resources Research, 35(12), 3591– 3605.Google Scholar
Øren, P. E., and Bakke, S. 2002. Process based reconstruction of sandstones and prediction of transport properties. Transport in Porous Media, 46(2–3), 311–343.Google Scholar
Øren, P. E., and Bakke, S. 2003. Reconstruction of Berea sandstone and pore-scale modelling of wettability effects. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 39(3–4), 177–199.Google Scholar
Øren, P. E., and Pinczewski, W. V. 1994. The effect of wettability and spreading coefficients on the recovery of waterflood residual oil by miscible gasflooding. SPE Formation Evaluation, 9(2), 149–156.Google Scholar
Øren, P. E., and Pinczewski, W. V. 1995. Fluid distribution and pore-scale displacement mechanisms in drainage dominated three-phase flow. Transport in Porous Media, 20(1–2), 105–133.Google Scholar
Øren, P. E., Billiotte, J., and Pinczewski, W. V. 1992. Mobilization of waterflood residual oil by gas injection for water-wet conditions. SPE Formation Evaluation, 7(1), 70–78.Google Scholar
Øren, P. E., Billiotte, J., and Pinczewski, W. V. 1994. Pore-Scale Network Modelling of Waterflood Residual Oil Recovery by Immiscible Gas Flooding. SPE 27814, proceedings of the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 17–20 April.
Øren, P. E., Bakke, S., and Arntzen, O. J. 1998. Extending predictive capabilities to network models. SPE Journal, 3(4), 324–336.Google Scholar
Øren, P. E., Bakke, S., and Held, R. 2007. Direct pore-scale computation of material and transport properties for North Sea reservoir rocks. Water Resources Research, 43(12), W12S04.Google Scholar
Orr, F. M. Jr. 2007. Theory of Gas Injection Processes. Tie-Line Publications, Copenhagen.
Ovaysi, S., and Piri, M. 2010. Direct pore-level modeling of incompressible fluid flow in porous media. Journal of Computational Physics, 229(19), 7456–7476.Google Scholar
Ovaysi, S., Wheeler, M. F., and Balhoff, M. 2014. Quantifying the representative size in porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 104(2), 349–362.Google Scholar
Pak, T., Butler, I. B., Geiger, S., van Dijke, M. I. J., and Sorbie, K. S. 2015. Droplet fragmentation: 3D imaging of a previously unidentified pore-scale process during multiphase flow in porous media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(7), 1947–1952.Google Scholar
Pan, C., Hilpert, M., and Miller, C. T. 2001. Pore-scale modeling of saturated permeabilities in random sphere packings. Physical Review E, 64(6), 066702.Google Scholar
Pan, C., Hilpert, M., and Miller, C. T. 2004. Lattice-Boltzmann simulation of two-phase flow in porous media. Water Resources Research, 40(1), W01501.Google Scholar
Panfilov, M., and Panfilova, I. 2005. Phenomenological meniscus model for two-phase flows in porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 58(1–2), 87–119.Google Scholar
Parker, J. C., Lenhard, R. J., and Kuppusamy, T. 1987. A parametric model for constitutive properties governing multiphase flow in porous media. Water Resources Research, 23(4), 618–624.Google Scholar
Parlange, J. Y., and Hill, D. 1976. Theoretical analysis of wetting front instability in soils. Soil Science, 122(4), 236–239.Google Scholar
Patankar, S. V., and Spalding, D. B. 1972. A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 15(10), 1787–1806.Google Scholar
Patzek, T. W. 2001. Verification of a complete pore network simulator of drainage and imbibition. SPE Journal, 6(2), 144–156.Google Scholar
Payatakes, A. C. 1982. Dynamics of oil ganglia during immiscible displacement in water-wet porous media. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 14(1), 365–393.Google Scholar
Pentland, C. H. 2011. Measurements of Non-wetting Phase Trapping in Porous Media. PhD thesis, Imperial College London.
Pentland, C. H., Tanino, Y., Iglauer, S., and Blunt, M. J. 2010. Capillary Trapping in Water-Wet Sandstones: Coreflooding Experiments and Pore-Network Modeling. SPE 133798, proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, 19–22 September.
Pentland, C. H., El-Maghraby, R., Iglauer, S., and Blunt, M. J. 2011. Measurements of the capillary trapping of super-critical carbon dioxide in Berea sandstone. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(6), L06401.Google Scholar
Pereira, G. G. 1999. Numerical pore-scale modeling of three-phase fluid flow: Comparison between simulation and experiment. Physical Review E, 59(4), 4229–4242.Google Scholar
Pereira, G. G., Pinczewski, W. V., Chan, D. Y. C., Paterson, L., and Øren, P. E. 1996. Pore-scale network model for drainage-dominated three-phase flow in porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 24(2), 167–201.Google Scholar
Philip, J. R. 1974. Fifty years progress in soil physics. Geoderma, 12(4), 265–280.Google Scholar
Pickell, J. J., Swanson, B. F., and Hickmann, W. B. 1966. Application of air-mercury and oil-air capillary pressure data in the study of pore structure and fluid distribution. SPE Journal, 6(1), 55–61.Google Scholar
Piller, M., Schena, G., Nolich, M., Favretto, S., Radaelli, F., and Rossi, E. 2009. Analysis of hydraulic permeability in porous media: From high resolution X-ray tomography to direct numerical simulation. Transport in Porous Media, 80(1), 57–78.Google Scholar
Piri, M., and Blunt, M. J. 2005a. Three-dimensional mixed-wet random pore-scale network modeling of two- and three-phase flow in porous media. I. Model description. Physical Review E, 71(2), 026301.Google Scholar
Piri, M., and Blunt, M. J. 2005b. Three-dimensional mixed-wet random pore-scale network modeling of two- and three-phase flow in porous media. II. Results. Physical Review E, 71(2), 026302.Google Scholar
Plug, W. J., and Bruining, J. 2007. Capillary pressure for the sand-CO2-water system under various pressure conditions. Application to CO2 sequestration. Advances in Water Resources, 30(11), 2339–2353.Google Scholar
Poiseuille, J. L. 1844. Recherches expérimentales sur le mouvement des liquides dans les tubes de très-petits diamètres. Imprimerie Royale, Paris.
Poisson, S. D. 1831. Memoire sur les equations generales de l'equilibre et du mouvement des corps solides elastiques et des fluides. J. Ecole Polytechnique, 13, 1–174.Google Scholar
Popinet, S., and Zaleski, S. 1999. A front-tracking algorithm for accurate representation of surface tension. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 30(6), 775–793.Google Scholar
Porter, M.L., Wildenschild, D., Grant, G., and Gerhard, J. I. 2010. Measurement and prediction of the relationship between capillary pressure, saturation, and interfacial area in a NAPL-water-glass bead system.Water Resources Research, 46(8), W08512.Google Scholar
Porter, M. L., Schaap, M. G., and Wildenschild, D. 2009. Lattice-Boltzmann simulations of the capillary pressure-saturation-interfacial area relationship for porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 32(11), 1632–1640.Google Scholar
Princen, H. M. 1969a. Capillary phenomena in assemblies of parallel cylinders: I. Capillary rise between two cylinders. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 30(1), 69–75.Google Scholar
Princen, H. M. 1969b. Capillary phenomena in assemblies of parallel cylinders: II. Capillary rise in systems with more than two cylinders. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 30(3), 359–371.Google Scholar
Princen, H. M. 1970. Capillary phenomena in assemblies of parallel cylinders: III. Liquid Columns between Horizontal Parallel Cylinders. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 34(2), 171–184.Google Scholar
Prodanovíc, M. 2016. Digital rocks portal. https://www.digitalrocksportal.org/.
Prodanovíc, M., and Bryant, S. L. 2006. A level set method for determining critical curvatures for drainage and imbibition. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 304(2), 442–458.Google Scholar
Prodanovíc, M., Lindquist, W. B., and Seright, R. S. 2006. Porous structure and fluid partitioning in polyethylene cores from 3D X-ray microtomographic imaging. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 298(1), 282–297.Google Scholar
Prodanovíc, M., Lindquist, W. B., and Seright, R. S. 2007. 3D image-based characterization of fluid displacement in a Berea core. Advances in Water Resources, 30(2), 214–226.Google Scholar
Prodanovíc, M., Bryant, S. L., and Davis, J. S. 2013. Numerical simulation of diagenetic alteration and its effect on residual gas in tight gas sandstones. Transport in Porous Media, 96(1), 39–62.Google Scholar
Prodanovíc, M., Mehmani, A., and Sheppard, A. P. 2015. Imaged-based multiscale network modelling of microporosity in carbonates. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 406(1), 95–113.Google Scholar
Rabbani, A., Jamshidi, S., and S., Salehi. 2014. An automated simple algorithm for realistic pore network extraction from micro-tomography images. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 123, 164–171.Google Scholar
Raeesi, B., and Piri, M. 2009. The effects of wettability and trapping on relationships between interfacial area, capillary pressure and saturation in porous media: A pore-scale network modeling approach. Journal of Hydrology, 376(3–4), 337–352.Google Scholar
Raeini, A. Q., Blunt, M. J., and Bijeljic, B. 2012. Modelling two-phase flow in porous media at the pore scale using the volume-of-fluid method. Journal of Computational Physics, 231(17), 5653–5668.Google Scholar
Raeini, A. Q., Bijeljic, B., and Blunt, M. J. 2014a. Direct simulations of two-phase flow on micro- CT images of porous media and upscaling of pore-scale forces. Advances in Water Resources, 231(17), 5653–5668.Google Scholar
Raeini, A. Q., Bijeljic, B., and Blunt, M. J. 2014b. Numerical modelling of sub-pore scale events in two-phase flow through porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 101(2), 191–213.Google Scholar
Raeini, A. Q., Bijeljic, B., and Blunt, M. J. 2015. Modelling capillary trapping using finite-volume simulation of two-phase flow directly on micro-CT images. Advances in Water Resources, 83, 102–110.Google Scholar
Rahman, T., Lebedev, M., Barifcani, A., and Iglauer, S. 2016. Residual trapping of supercritical CO2 in oil-wet sandstone. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 469, 63–68.Google Scholar
Ramstad, T., Øren, P. E., and Bakke, S. 2010. Simulation of two-phase flow in reservoir rocks using a lattice Boltzmann method. SPE Journal, 15(4), 917–927.Google Scholar
Ramstad, T., Idowu, N., Nardi, C., and Øren, P. E. 2012. Relative permeability calculations from twophase flow simulations directly on digital images of porous rocks. Transport in Porous Media, 94(2), 487–504.Google Scholar
Ransohoff, T. C, and Radke, C. J. 1988. Laminar flow of a wetting liquid along the corners of a predominantly gas-occupied noncircular pore. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 121(2), 392–401.Google Scholar
Ransohoff, T. C., Gauglitz, P. A., and Radke, C. J. 1987. Snap-off of gas bubbles in smoothly constricted noncircular capillaries. AIChE Journal, 33(5), 753–765.Google Scholar
Reeves, P. C., and Celia, M. A. 1996. A functional relationship between capillary pressure, saturation, and interfacial area as revealed by a pore-scale network model. Water Resources Research, 32(8), 2345–2358.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. A. 2016. Multiphase Flow Behaviour and Relative Permeability of CO2-brine and N2-water in Sandstones . PhD thesis, Imperial College London.
Reynolds, C. A., and Krevor, S. 2015. Characterising flow behavior for gas injection: Relative permeability of CO2-brine and N2-water in heterogeneous rocks. Water Resources Research, 51(12), 9464–9489.Google Scholar
Richards, L. A. 1931. Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Journal of Applied Physics, 1(5), 318–333.Google Scholar
Robin, M., Rosenberg, E., and Fassi-Fihri, O. 1995. Wettability studies at the pore level: A new approach by the use of cryo-scanning electron microscopy. SPE Formation Evaluation, 10(1), 11–20.Google Scholar
Roof, J. G. 1970. Snap-off of oil droplets in water-wet pores. SPE Journal, 10(1), 85–90.Google Scholar
Roth, S., Hong, Y., Bale, H., Zhao, T., Bhattiprolu, S., Andrew, M., Weichao, C., Gelb, J., and Hornberger, B. 2016. Fully controlled sampling workflow for multi-scale X-ray imaging of complex reservoir rock samples to be used for digital rock physics. GEO 2016-2348618, proceedings of the 12th Middle East Geosciences Conference and Exhibition, 2016, Manama, Bahrain, 4–7 March.
Rothman, D. H. 1988. Cellular-automaton fluids: A model for flow in porous media. Geophysics, 53(4), 509–518.Google Scholar
Rothman, D. H. 1990. Macroscopic laws for immiscible two-phase flow in porous media: Results from numerical experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 95(B6), 8663– 8674.Google Scholar
Roux, S., and Guyon, E. 1989. Temporal development of invasion percolation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 22(17), 3693–3705.Google Scholar
Rücker, M., Berg, S., Armstrong, R. T., Georgiadis, A., Ott, H., Schwing, A., Neiteler, R., Brussee, N., Makurat, A., Leu, L., Wolf, M., Khan, F., Enzmann, F., and Kersten, M. 2015. From connected pathway flow to ganglion dynamics. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(10), 3888–3894.Google Scholar
Rudman, M. 1997. Volume–tracking methods for interfacial flow calculations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 24(7), 671–691.Google Scholar
Ryazanov, A. V., van Dijke, M. I. J., and Sorbie, K. S. 2009. Two-phase pore-network modelling: Existence of oil layers during water invasion. Transport in Porous Media, 80(1), 79–99.Google Scholar
Sadjadi, Z., Jung, M., Seemann, R., and Rieger, H. 2015. Meniscus arrest during capillary rise in asymmetric microfluidic pore junctions. Langmuir, 31(8), 2600–2608.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G., and Taylor, G. 1958. The penetration of a fluid into a porous medium or Hele- Shaw cell containing a more viscous liquid. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 245(1242), 312–329.Google Scholar
Sahini, M. 1993. Flow phenomena in rocks: From continuum models to fractals, percolation, cellular automata, and simulated annealing. Reviews of Modern Physics, 65(4), 1393–1534.Google Scholar
Sahini, M. 2011. Flow and Transport in Porous Media and Fractured Rock: From ClassicalMethods to Modern Approaches. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Sahini, M., and Sahimi, M. 1994. Applications of Percolation Theory. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
Sahni, A., Burger, J., and Blunt, M. 1998. Measurement of Three Phase Relative Permeability during Gravity Drainage using CT. SPE 39655, proceedings of the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 19–22 April.
Salathiel, R. A. 1973. Oil recovery by surface film drainage in mixed-wettability rocks. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 25(10), 1216–1224.Google Scholar
Saraji, S., Goual, L., and Piri, M. 2010. Adsorption of asphaltenes in porous media under flow conditions. Energy & Fuels, 24(11), 6009–6017.Google Scholar
Saripalli, K. P., Kim, H., Rao, P. S. C., and Annable, M. D. 1997. Measurement of specific fluid-fluid interfacial areas of immiscible fluids in porous media. Environmental Science & Technology, 31(3), 932–936.Google Scholar
Scardovelli, R., and Zaleski, S. 1999. Direct numerical simulation of free-surface and interfacial flow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 31(1), 567–603.Google Scholar
Schaefer, C. E., DiCarlo, D. A., and Blunt, M. J. 2000. Experimental measurement of air-water interfacial area during gravity drainage and secondary imbibition in porous media. Water Resources Research, 36(4), 885–890.Google Scholar
Schladitz, K. 2011. Quantitative micro-CT. Journal of Microscopy, 243(2), 111–117.Google Scholar
Schlüter, S., Sheppard, A., Brown, K., and Wildenschild, D. 2014. Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X-ray microtomography: A review. Water Resources Research, 50(4), 3615–3639.Google Scholar
Schmatz, J., Urai, J. L., Berg, S., and Ott, H. 2015. Nanoscale imaging of pore-scale fluid-fluid-solid contacts in sandstone. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(7), 2189–2195.Google Scholar
Schmid, K. S., and Geiger, S. 2012. Universal scaling of spontaneous imbibition for water-wet systems. Water Resources Research, 48(3), W03507.Google Scholar
Schmid, K. S., and Geiger, S. 2013. Universal scaling of spontaneous imbibition for arbitrary petrophysical properties: Water-wet and mixed-wet states and Handy's conjecture. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 101, 44–61.Google Scholar
Schmid, K. S., Geiger, S., and Sorbie, K. S. 2011. Semianalytical solutions for cocurrent and countercurrent imbibition and dispersion of solutes in immiscible two-phase flow. Water Resources Research, 47(2), W02550.Google Scholar
Selker, J. S., Steenhuis, T. S., and Parlange, J. Y. 1992. Wetting front instability in homogeneous sandy soils under continuous infiltration. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56(5), 1346– 1350.Google Scholar
Serra, J. 1986. Introduction to mathematical morphology. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 35(3), 283–305.Google Scholar
Shah, S. M., Gray, F., Crawshaw, J. P., and Boek, E. S. 2016. Micro-computed tomography porescale study of flow in porous media: Effect of voxel resolution. Advances in Water Resources, 95, 276–287.Google Scholar
Sharma, M. M., and Wunderlich, R. W. 1987. The alteration of rock properties due to interactions with drilling-fluid components. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 1(2), 127–143.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. P., Knackstedt, M. A., Pinczewski, W. V., and Sahimi, M. 1999. Invasion percolation: New algorithms and universality classes. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 32(49), L521–L529.Google Scholar
Silin, D., and Patzek, T. 2006. Pore space morphology analysis using maximal inscribed spheres. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 371(2), 336–360.Google Scholar
Silin, D., Tomutsa, L., Benson, S. M., and Patzek, T. W. 2011. Microtomography and pore-scale modeling of two-phase fluid distribution. Transport in Porous Media, 86(2), 495–515.Google Scholar
Singh, K., Niven, R. K., Senden, T. J., Turner, M. L., Sheppard, A. P., Middleton, J. P., and Knackstedt, M. A. 2011. Remobilization of residual non-aqueous phase liquid in porous media by freeze-thaw cycles. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(8), 3473–3478.Google Scholar
Singh, K., Bijeljic, B., and Blunt, M. J. 2016. Imaging of oil layers, curvature and contact angle in a mixed-wet and a water-wet carbonate rock. Water Resources Research, 52(3), 1716–1728.Google Scholar
Singh, M., and Mohanty, K. K. 2003. Dynamic modeling of drainage through three-dimensional porous materials. Chemical Engineering Science, 58(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Sivanesapillai, R., Falkner, N., Hartmaier, A., and Steeb, H. 2016. A CSF-SPH method for simulating drainage and imbibition at pore-scale resolution while tracking interfacial areas. Advances in Water Resources, 95, 212–234.Google Scholar
Skauge, A., Sørvik, A., B., Vik., and Spildo, K. 2006. Effect of wettability on oil recovery from carbonate material representing different pore classes. SCA2006-01, proceedings of the Society of Core Analysts Annual Meeting, Trondheim, Norway.
Sohrabi, M., Tehrani, D. H., Danesh, A., and Henderson, G. D. 2004. Visualization of oil recovery by water-alternating-gas injection using high-pressure micromodels. SPE Journal, 9(3), 290–301.Google Scholar
Sok, R. M., Knackstedt, M. A., Sheppard, A. P., Pinczewski, W.V., Lindquist, W. B., Venkatarangan, A., and Paterson, L. 2002. Direct and stochastic generation of network models from tomographic images: Effect of topology on residual saturations. Transport in Porous Media, 46(2–3), 345–371.Google Scholar
Soll, W. E., and Celia, M. A. 1993. A modified percolation approach to simulating three-fluid capillary pressure-saturation relationships. Advances in Water Resources, 16(2), 107–126.Google Scholar
Spalding, D. B., and Patankar, S. V. 1972. A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 15(10), 1787–1806.Google Scholar
Spanne, P., Thovert, J. F., Jacquin, C. J., Lindquist, W. B., Jones, K. W., and Adler, P. M. 1994. Synchrotron computed microtomograhy of porous media: Topology and transports. Physical Review Letters, 73(14), 2001–2004.Google Scholar
Spelt, P. D. M. 2005. A level-set approach for simulations of flows with multiple moving contact lines with hysteresis. Journal of Computational Physics, 207(2), 389–404.Google Scholar
Spiteri, E. J., Juanes, R., Blunt, M. J., and Orr, F. M. 2008. A new model of trapping and relative permeability hysteresis for all wettability characteristics. SPE Journal, 13(3), 277–288.Google Scholar
Stauffer, D., and Aharony, A. 1994. Introduction to Percolation Theory. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
Steenhuis, T. S., Baver, C. E., Hasanpour, B., Stoof, C. R., DiCarlo, D. A., and Selker, J. S. 2013. Pore scale consideration in unstable gravity driven finger flow. Water Resources Research, 49(11), 7815–7819.Google Scholar
Stokes, G. G. 1845. On the theories of the internal friction of fluids in motion, and of the equilibrium and motion of elastic solids. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 8, 287–305.Google Scholar
Stone, H. L. 1970. Probability model for estimating three-phase relative permeability. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 22(2), 214–218.Google Scholar
Stone, H. L. 1973. Estimation of three-phase relative permeability and residual oil data. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 12(4), 53–61.Google Scholar
Strebelle, S. 2002. Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Mathematical Geology, 34(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Strenski, P. N., Bradley, R. M., and Debierre, J. M. 1991. Scaling behavior of percolation surfaces in three dimensions. Physical Review Letters, 66(10), 1330–1333.Google Scholar
Stüben, K. 2001. An introduction to algebraic multigrid. ebrary.free.fr, 413–532.Google Scholar
Suekane, T., Zhou, N., Hosokawa, T., and Matsumoto, T. 2010. Direct observation of trapped gas bubbles by capillarity in sandy porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 82(1), 111–122.Google Scholar
Suicmez, V. S., Piri, M., and Blunt, M. J. 2007. Pore-scale simulation of water alternate gas injection. Transport in Porous Media, 66(3), 259–286.Google Scholar
Suicmez, V. S., Piri, M., and Blunt, M. J. 2008. Effects of wettability and pore-level displacement on hydrocarbon trapping. Advances in Water Resources, 31, 503–512.Google Scholar
Sussman, M., Smereka, P., and Osher, S. 1994. A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. Journal of Computational Physics, 114(1), 146–159.Google Scholar
Tallakstad, K. T., Løvoll, G., Knudsen, H. A., Ramstad, T., Flekkøy, E. G., and Måløy, K. J. 2009a. Steady-state, simultaneous two-phase flow in porous media: An experimental study. Physical Review E, 80(3), 036308.Google Scholar
Tallakstad, K. T., Knudsen, H. A., Ramstad, T., Løvoll, G., Måløy, K. J., Toussaint, R., and Flekkøy, E. G. 2009b. Steady-state two-phase flow in porous media: Statistics and transport properties. Physical Review Letters, 102(7), 074502.Google Scholar
Talon, L., Bauer, D., Gland, N., Youssef, S., Auradou, H., and Ginzburg, I. 2012. Assessment of the two relaxation time lattice-Boltzmann scheme to simulate Stokes flow in porous media. Water Resources Research, 48(4), W04526.Google Scholar
Tanino, Y., and Blunt, M. J. 2012. Capillary trapping in sandstones and carbonates: Dependence on pore structure. Water Resources Research, 48, W08525.Google Scholar
Tanino, Y., and Blunt, M. J. 2013. Laboratory investigation of capillary trapping under mixed-wet conditions. Water Resources Research, 49(7), 4311–4319.Google Scholar
Tartakovsky, A. M., and Meakin, P. 2005. A smoothed particle hydrodynamics model for miscible flow in three-dimensional fractures and the two-dimensional Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Journal of Computational Physics, 207(2), 610–624.Google Scholar
Tartakovsky, A. M., and Meakin, P. 2006. Pore scale modeling of immiscible and miscible fluid flows using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Advances in Water Resources, 29(10), 1464– 1478.Google Scholar
Tartakovsky, A. M., Ward, A. L., and Meakin, P. 2007. Pore-scale simulations of drainage of heterogeneous and anisotropic porous media. Physics of Fluids, 19(10), 103301.Google Scholar
Tartakovsky, A. M., Ferris, K. F., and Meakin, P. 2009a. Lagrangian particle model for multiphase flows. Computer Physics Communications, 180(10), 1874–1881.Google Scholar
Tartakovsky, A. M., Meakin, P., and Ward, A. L. 2009b. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics model of non-aqueous phase liquid flow and dissolution. Transport in Porous Media, 76(1), 11–34.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. F., O_Sullivan, C., and Sim, W. W. 2015. A new method to identify void constrictions in micro-CT images of sand. Computers and Geotechnics, 69, 279–290.Google Scholar
Theodoropoulou, M. A., Sygouni, V., Karoutsos, V., and Tsakiroglou, C. D. 2005. Relative permeability and capillary pressure functions of porous media as related to the displacement growth pattern. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 31(10–11), 1155–1180.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. E, Willson, C. S, White, C. D., Nyman, S., Bhattacharya, J. P, and Reed, A. H. 2008. Application of a new grain-based reconstruction algorithm to microtomography images for quantitative characterization and flow modeling. SPE Journal, 13(2), 164–176.Google Scholar
Thompson, P. A., and Robbins, M. O. 1989. Simulations of contact-line motion: Slip and the dynamic contact angle. Physical Review Letters, 63(7), 766–769.Google Scholar
Thovert, J. F., Salles, J., and Adler, P. M. 1993. Computerized characterization of the geometry of real porous media: Their discretization, analysis and interpretation. Journal of Microscopy, 170(1), 65–79.Google Scholar
Todd, M. R., and Longstaff, W. J. 1972. The development, testing, and application of a numerical simulator for predicting miscible flood performance. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 24(7), 874–882.Google Scholar
Tolman, S., and Meakin, P. 1989. Off-lattice and hypercubic-lattice models for diffusion-limited aggregation in dimensionalities 2–8. Physical Review A, 40(1), 428–437.Google Scholar
Tørå, G., Øren, P. E., and Hansen, A. 2012. A dynamic network model for two-phase flow in porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 92(1), 145–164.Google Scholar
Torsæter, O. 1988. A comparative study of wettability test methods based on experimental results from north sea reservoir rocks. SPE 18281, proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, October 2–5.
Treiber, L. E., Archer, D. L., and Owens, W. W. 1972. Laboratory evaluation of the wettability of fifty oil producing reservoirs. SPE Journal, 12(6), 531–540.Google Scholar
Trojer, M., Szulczewski, M. L., and Juanes, R. 2015. Stabilizing fluid-fluid displacements in porous media through wettability alteration. Physical Review Applied, 3(5), 054008.Google Scholar
Tryggvason, G., Bunner, B., Esmaeeli, A., Juric, D., Al-Rawahi, N., Tauber, W., Han, J., Nas, S., and Jan, Y. J. 2001. A front-tracking method for the computations of multiphase flow. Journal of Computational Physics, 169(2), 708–759.Google Scholar
Turner, M. L., Knüfing, L., Arns, C. H., Sakellariou, A., Senden, T. J., Sheppard, A. P., Sok, R. M., Limaye, A., Pinczewski, W. V., and Knackstedt, M. A. 2004. Three-dimensional imaging of multiphase flow in porous media. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 339(1–2), 166–172.Google Scholar
Unsal, E., Mason, G., Ruth, D. W., and Morrow, N. R. 2007a. Co- and counter-current spontaneous imbibition into groups of capillary tubes with lateral connections permitting cross-flow. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 315(1), 200–209.Google Scholar
Unsal, E., Mason, G., Morrow, N. R., and Ruth, D. W. 2007b. Co-current and counter-current imbibition in independent tubes of non-axisymmetric geometry. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 306(1), 105–117.Google Scholar
Unverdi, S., and Tryggvason, G. 1992. A front-tracking method for viscous, incompressible, multifluid flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 100(1), 25–37.Google Scholar
Valavanides, M. S., Constantinides, G. N., and Payatakes, A. C. 1998. Mechanistic model of steadystate two-phase flow in porous media based on ganglion dynamics. Transport in Porous Media, 30(3), 267–299.Google Scholar
Valavanides, M.S., and Payatakes, A.C. 2001. True-to-mechanism model of steady-state two-phase flow in porous media, using decomposition into prototype flows. Advances in Water Resources, 24(3–4), 385–407.Google Scholar
Valvatne, P. H., and Blunt, M. J. 2004. Predictive pore-scale modeling of two-phase flow in mixed wet media. Water Resources Research, 40(7), W07406.Google Scholar
van der Marck, S. C., Matsuura, T., and Glas, J. 1997. Viscous and capillary pressures during drainage: Network simulations and experiments. Physical Review E, 56(5), 5675–5687.Google Scholar
van Dijke, M. I. J., and Sorbie, K. S. 2002a. An analysis of three-phase pore occupancies and relative permeabilities in porous media with variable wettability. Transport in Porous Media, 48(2), 159–185.Google Scholar
van Dijke, M. I. J., and Sorbie, K. S. 2002b. Pore-scale network model for three-phase flow in mixedwet porous media. Physical Review E, 66(4), 046302.Google Scholar
van Dijke, M. I. J., and Sorbie, K. S. 2002c. The relation between interfacial tensions and wettability in three-phase systems: Consequences for pore occupancy and relative permeability. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 33(1–3), 39–48.Google Scholar
van Dijke, M. I. J., and Sorbie, K. S. 2003. Pore-scale modelling of three-phase flow in mixed-wet porous media: Multiple displacement chains. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 39(3–4), 201–216.Google Scholar
van Dijke, M. I. J., and Sorbie, K. S. 2006a. Cusp at the three-fluid contact line in a cylindrical pore. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 297(2), 762–771.Google Scholar
van Dijke, M. I. J., and Sorbie, K. S. 2006b. Existence of fluid layers in the corners of a capillary with non-uniform wettability. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 293(2), 455– 463.Google Scholar
van Dijke, M. I. J., Sorbie, K. S., and McDougall, S. R. 2001a. Saturation-dependencies of threephase relative permeabilities in mixed-wet and fractionally wet systems. Advances in Water Resources, 24(3–4), 365–384.Google Scholar
van Dijke, M. I. J., McDougall, S. R., and Sorbie, K. S. 2001b. Three-phase capillary pressure and relative permeability relationships in mixed-wet systems. Transport in Porous Media, 44(1), 1–32.Google Scholar
van Dijke, M. I. J., Sorbie, K. S., Sohrabi, M., and Danesh, A. 2006. Simulation ofWAG floods in an oil-wet micromodel using a 2-D pore-scale network model. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 52(1–4), 71–86.Google Scholar
van Dijke, M. I. J., Piri, M., Helland, J. O., Sorbie, K. S., Blunt, M. J., and Skjæveland, S. M. 2007. Criteria for three-fluid configurations including layers in a pore with nonuniform wettability. Water Resources Research, 43(12), W12S05.Google Scholar
van Genuchten, M. T. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44(5), 892–898.Google Scholar
van Genuchten, M. T., and Nielsen, D. R. 1985. On describing and predicting the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils. Annales Geophysicae, 3(5), 615–628.Google Scholar
van Kats, F. M., Egberts, P. J. P., and van Kruijsdijk, C. P. J. W. 2001. Three-phase effective contact angle in a model pore. Transport in Porous Media, 43(2), 225–238.Google Scholar
Vicsek, T. 1992. Fractal Growth Phenomena. World Scientific, Singapore.
Vizika, O., and Lombard, J. M. 1996. Wettability and spreading: Two key parameters in oil recovery with three-phase gravity drainage. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 11(1), 54–60.Google Scholar
Vizika, O., Avraam, D. G., and Payatakes, A. C. 1994. On the role of the viscosity ratio during lowcapillary- number forced imbibition in porous media. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 165(2), 386–401.Google Scholar
Vogel, H. J. 2002. Topological Characterization of Porous Media. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 600. Springer, Berlin & Heidelberg.
Vogel, H. J, and Roth, K. 2001. Quantitative morphology and network representation of soil pore structure. Advances in Water Resources, 24(3–4), 233–242.Google Scholar
Vogel, H. J., Weller, U., and Schlüter, S. 2010. Quantification of soil structure based on Minkowski functions. Computers & Geosciences, 36(10), 1236–1245.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Zhou, Z., Zhang, W., Garoni, T. M., and Deng, Y. 2013. Bond and site percolation in three dimensions. Physical Review E, 87(5), 052107.Google Scholar
Washburn, E. W. 1921. The dynamics of capillary flow. Physical Review, 17(3), 273–283.Google Scholar
Welge, H. J. 1952. A simplified method for computing oil recovery by gas or water drive. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 4(4), 91–98.Google Scholar
Whitaker, S. 1986. Flow in porous media I: A theoretical derivation of Darcy's law. Transport in Porous Media, 1(1), 3–25.Google Scholar
Whitaker, S. 1999. The Method of Volume Averaging. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.
Whyman, G., Bormashenko, E., and Stein, T. 2008. The rigorous derivation of Young, Cassie-Baxter and Wenzel equations and the analysis of the contact angle hysteresis phenomenon. Chemical Physics Letters, 450(4–6), 355–359.Google Scholar
Wildenschild, D., and Sheppard, A. P. 2013. X-ray imaging and analysis techniques for quantifying pore-scale structure and processes in subsurface porous medium systems. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 217–246.Google Scholar
Wildenschild, D., Armstrong, R. T., Herring, A. L., Young, I. M., and Carey, J. W. 2011. Exploring capillary trapping efficiency as a function of interfacial tension, viscosity, and flow rate. Energy Procedia, 4, 4945–4952.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. 1984. Percolation model of immiscible displacement in the presence of buoyancy forces. Physical Review A, 30(1), 520–531.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. 1986. Percolation effects in immiscible displacement. Physical Review A, 34(2), 1380– 1391.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D., and Willemsen, J. F. 1983. Invasion percolation: A new form of percolation theory. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 16(14), 3365–3376.Google Scholar
Witten, T. A., and Sander, L. M. 1981. Diffusion-limited aggregation, a kinetic critical phenomenon. Physical Review Letters, 47(19), 1400–1403.Google Scholar
Wu, K., Van Dijke, M. I. J., Couples, G. D., Jiang, Z., Ma, J., Sorbie, K. S., Crawford, J., Young, I., and Zhang, X. 2006. 3D stochastic modelling of heterogeneous porous media – applications to reservoir rocks. Transport in Porous Media, 65(3), 443–467.Google Scholar
Wyckoff, R. D., and Botset, H. G. 1936. The flow of gas-liquid mixtures through unconsolidated sands. Journal of Applied Physics, 7(9), 325–345.Google Scholar
Wyckoff, R. D., Botset, H. G., Muskat, M., and Reed, D. W. 1933. The measurement of the permeability of porous media for homogeneous fluids. Review of Scientific Instruments, 4(7), 394–405.Google Scholar
Yan, J. N., Monezes, J. L., and Sharma, M. M. 1993.Wettability alteration caused by oil-based muds and mud components. SPE Drilling and Completion, 8(1), 35–44.Google Scholar
Yang, F., Hinger, F. F., Xiao, X., Liu, Y., Wu1, Z., Benson, S. M., and Toney, M. F. 2015. Extraction of pore-morphology and capillary pressure curves of porous media from synchrotron-based tomography data. Scientific Reports, 5, 10635.Google Scholar
Yang, X., Mehmani, Y., Perkins, W. A., Pasquali, A., Schönherr, M., Kim, K., Perego, M., Parks, M. L., Trask, N., Balhoff, M. T., Richmond, M. C., Geier, M., Krafczyk, M., Luo, L. S., Tartakovsky, A. M., and Scheibe, T. D. 2016. Intercomparison of 3D pore-scale flow and solute transport simulation methods. Advances in Water Resources, 95, 176–189.Google Scholar
Yeong, C. L. Y., and Torquato, S. 1998. Reconstructing random media. II. Three-dimensional media from two-dimensional cuts. Physical Review E, 58(1), 224–233.Google Scholar
Yortsos, Y. C., Xu, B., and Salin, D. 1997. Phase diagram of fully developed drainage in porous media. Physical Review Letters, 79(23), 4581–4584.Google Scholar
Young, T. 1805. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 95, 65–87.Google Scholar
Yuan, H. H., and Swanson, B. F. 1989. Resolving pore-space characteristics by rate-controlled porosimetry. SPE Formation Evaluation, 4(1), 17–24.Google Scholar
Zhao, X., Blunt, M. J., and Yao, J. 2010. Pore-scale modeling: Effects of wettability on waterflood oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 71(3–4), 169–178.Google Scholar
Zhou, D., and Blunt, M. 1997. Effect of spreading coefficient on the distribution of light non-aqueous phase liquid in the subsurface. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 25(1–2), 1–19.Google Scholar
Zhou, D., and Blunt, M. 1998. Wettability effects in three-phase gravity drainage. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 20(3–4), 203–211.Google Scholar
Zhou, D., Blunt, M., and Orr, F. M. Jr. 1997. Hydrocarbon drainage along corners of noncircular capillaries. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 187(1), 11–21.Google Scholar
Zhou, D., Jia, L., Kamath, J., and Kovscek, A. R. 2002. Scaling of counter-current imbibition processes in low-permeability porous media. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 33(1–3), 61–74.Google Scholar
Zhou, D., and Orr, F. M. Jr. 1995. The effects of gravity and viscous forces on residual nonwettingphase saturation. In Situ, 19(3), 249–273.Google Scholar
Zhou, X. R., Morrow, N., and S., Ma. 2000. Interrelationship of wettability, initial water saturation, aging time, and oil recovery by spontaneous imbibition and waterflooding. SPE Journal, 5(2), 199–207.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Helland, J., and Hatzignatiou, D. G. 2014. Pore-scale modeling of waterflooding in mixedwet- rock images: Effects of initial saturation and wettability. SPE Journal, 19(1), 88–100.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Helland, J. O., and Hatzignatiou, D. G. 2016. Computation of three-phase capillary pressure curves and fluid configurations at mixed-wet conditions in 2D rock images. SPE Journal, 21(1), 152–169.Google Scholar
Zhu, Y., Fox, P. J., and Morris, J. P. 1999. A pore-scale numerical model for flow through porous media. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 23(9), 881–904.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, R. W., Kumar, S., and Bodvarsson, G. S. 1991. Lubrication theory analysis of the permeability of rough-walled fractures. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, 28(4), 325–331.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Martin J. Blunt, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
  • Book: Multiphase Flow in Permeable Media
  • Online publication: 15 February 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145098.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Martin J. Blunt, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
  • Book: Multiphase Flow in Permeable Media
  • Online publication: 15 February 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145098.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Martin J. Blunt, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
  • Book: Multiphase Flow in Permeable Media
  • Online publication: 15 February 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145098.012
Available formats
×