Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T06:31:16.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Preparing for the discovery of extraterrestrial life: are we ready?: Considering potential risks, impacts, and plans

from Part IV - Practical considerations: how should society prepare for discovery – and non-discovery?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Margaret S. Race
Affiliation:
SETI Institute
Steven J. Dick
Affiliation:
Library of Congress, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

Science fiction novels and Hollywood movies have explored the subject of alien encounters for decades, but they provide little in the way of practical guidance on how humankind should respond to a verified discovery of extraterrestrial (ET) life. Today we are in the midst of unprecedented advances in our understanding of the potential for life in space. Without exaggeration, the prospects for finding ET life seem more likely all the time, raising questions of how well we are prepared to respond to a discovery. Do we Earthlings have the necessary plans and preparations for responding to potential risks and impacts of different discovery scenarios? Would it matter what kind of life is discovered first? Who would be involved in decision making on behalf of humankind?

This chapter takes a systematic approach to evaluating in detail how current decision-making processes and policies are prepared to deal with future discoveries and the associated risks and consequences of interacting with different types of ET life. It examines the three main search types (SETI, extrasolar planets, and Solar System searches), at three different search phases (during searches, upon discovery, and post discovery) and assesses comparative preparedness for systematic deliberations involving multiple stakeholders, scientific and otherwise. The evaluation borrows heavily from approaches used by the hazard-management and risk-analysis communities, which have extensive experience and research involving threats of many types, whether natural or man-made, and predictable, deliberate, or accidental (Alexander 2000; Eisner et al. 2012; Tierney 2014). In addition to providing a detailed comparison of current search efforts, this risk-centered approach also serves to highlight particular topics or procedural steps that may need more attention in order to develop practical and coordinated implementation plans for responding to any future discovery of ET life, whenever and wherever it may occur.

Putting searches in context

Before discussing the similarities and differences between current searches, it is important to recognize that there is no such thing as planning a response to the discovery of ET life, but rather multiple responses, built upon the characteristics of the different search efforts under way. Each anticipates different scenarios and types of life (intelligent, complex, or simple) as well as potential impacts, risks, and timeframes. In addition, each raises assorted questions that will require inputs from different perspectives – scientific and otherwise – regardless of who makes the first discovery.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, D. 2000. Confronting Catastrophe. Harpenden: Terra Publishing.Google Scholar
Almar, I. and Shuch, H. P.. 2007. “The San Marino Scale: a New Analytical Tool for Assessing Transmission Risk.” Acta Astronautica 60, 57–59. For an online calculator for the Rio scale, devised by the Permanent SETI Committee of the IAA. See http://avsport.org/IAA/riocalc.htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COSPAR. 2011. COSPAR Planetary Protection Policy, [20 Oct 2002 as amended to 24 Mar 2011]. See https://cosparhq.cnes.fr/sites/default/files/pppolicy.pdf.
Denning, K. 2011. “Unpacking the Great Transmission Debate.” In Vakoch, D., ed. Communication with Extraterrestrial Intelligence. New York, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 237–252.Google Scholar
Dick, S. J. 1996. The Biological Universe: The Twentieth Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate and the Limits of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eisner, J. R., Bostrom, A., Burton, I., et al. 2012. “Risk Interpretation and Action: A conceptual framework for responses to Natural Hazards.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 1, 5–16.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, C. A. 2014. “Summarizing Risk Using Risk Measures and Risk Indices.” Risk Analysis 34, 2143–2162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzer, M. 2011. When Biospheres Collide: A History of NASA's Planetary Protection Programs. Washington, DC: NASA.Google Scholar
Michaud, M. A. G. 2007. Contact with Alien Civilizations: Our Hopes and Fears about Encountering Extraterrestrials, New York, NY: Copernicus Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NASA. 2015. Workshop on Planetary Protection Knowledge Gaps for Human Extraterrestrial Missions. See http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/LPI-PP-Workshop-Announcement_2015_01-08v7.pdf
Rummel, J. D., Race, M. S., DeVincenzi, D. L., et al. (eds.), 2002. A Draft Test Protocol For Detecting Possible Biohazards in Martian Samples Returned to Earth. Washington, DC: NASA.Google Scholar
Schenkel, P. 1997. “Legal Frameworks for Two Contact Scenarios.” J. British Interplanetary Society 50, 258–262.Google Scholar
Seager, S. 2013. “Exoplanet Habitability.” Science 340, 577–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siemion, A.et al., 2015. “Regarding Messaging to Extraterrestrial Intelligence (METI) / Active Searches for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (Active SETI)” [Anti Active-SETI petition]. UC Berkeley. See https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/meti_statement_0.html.
Slovic, P. 2000. Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Tarter, J. and Michaud, M. A. G.. 1990. “SETI Post Detection Protocol.” Acta Astronautica 21, 69–174.Google Scholar
Tarter, J. and Black, D., 2015. “Active SETI: Is it Time to Start Transmitting to the Cosmos?” Conference Session at AAAS Annual Meeting 2015, and follow-on Workshop at SETI Institute, Mountain View CA, Feb 2015.
Tierney, K. 2014. The Social Roots of Risk: Producing Disasters, Promoting Resilience. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1967. “Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies.” See http://www.unoosa.org/oosa/SpaceLaw/outerspt.html.
World Economic Forum. 2013. “X Factors – Discovery of Alien Life.” In Lee Howell, ed., Global Risks 2013 Eighth Edition, Section 5. See http://reports.weforum.org/global-risks-2013.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×