Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T04:12:32.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Hedging Insurance Contracts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

Dilip Madan
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Wim Schoutens
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Summary

In this chapter we illustrate the conic finance theory in the setting of equitylinked insurance contracts. We elaborate on how to improve the risk profile and risk-manage such types of contracts (see also Carr et al. (2016)).

Insurance books often combine exposures to financial and non-financial risks, with the financial component often being quite complex and involving pathdependent aspects. Yet one anticipates that movements in security prices over the near term can have considerable effects on the present value of payouts associated with the insurance liabilities. Taking positions in the options markets of related securities may constitute a good hedge for the insurance book. The purpose here is to present a detailed methodology for constructing such option hedges. The purpose of the hedge is not that of replication or risk elimination, as this is not expected to be possible, but one of improving the overall quality of the position.

Implementation of the methodology requires an ability to simulate the paths, at a regular frequency, of relevant underliers and the associated present value of the related insurance cash flows. We introduce as hedging assets positions in the underlying stocks and out of the money options on these stocks. The residual position that we investigate is given by earnings on the hedge positions together with the present value of the insurance contract's cash flows. The hedge positions are sought in a way that makes the package more diversified. Diversity is measured by the gap between the ask price of the package and the sum of the ask prices of the components of the package.We hence face an optimization problem in the number of all options on all underliers plus the number of underliers for the stock positions. The hedge is designed to numerically solve this optimization problem.

We exemplify the methodology on Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit Variable Annuities (GMWBVA). When such deals are struck, or more generally whenever these deals are on the books, they are exposed to market risk. Using a particular model, one can try to estimate this risk and, for example, estimate what the marked-to-market profit or loss would be if the underlying stock or index were to move.

Type
Chapter
Information
Applied Conic Finance , pp. 148 - 157
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Hedging Insurance Contracts
  • Dilip Madan, University of Maryland, College Park, Wim Schoutens, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • Book: Applied Conic Finance
  • Online publication: 27 October 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316585108.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Hedging Insurance Contracts
  • Dilip Madan, University of Maryland, College Park, Wim Schoutens, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • Book: Applied Conic Finance
  • Online publication: 27 October 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316585108.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Hedging Insurance Contracts
  • Dilip Madan, University of Maryland, College Park, Wim Schoutens, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • Book: Applied Conic Finance
  • Online publication: 27 October 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316585108.010
Available formats
×