Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Table of Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of Acronyms
- Introduction: The Sublime Object of Nationalism
- Chapter 1 The Nature of African Nationalism
- Chapter 2 The Democratic Origin of Nations
- Chapter 3 African Nationalism in South Africa
- Chapter 4 The South African Nation
- Chapter 5 The Impossibility of the National Community
- Chapter 6 The Production of the Public Domain
- Chapter 7 The Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Identity of ‘the People’
- Conclusion: Notes Towards a Theory of the Democratic Limit
- Endnotes
- Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 4 - The South African Nation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 May 2019
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Table of Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of Acronyms
- Introduction: The Sublime Object of Nationalism
- Chapter 1 The Nature of African Nationalism
- Chapter 2 The Democratic Origin of Nations
- Chapter 3 African Nationalism in South Africa
- Chapter 4 The South African Nation
- Chapter 5 The Impossibility of the National Community
- Chapter 6 The Production of the Public Domain
- Chapter 7 The Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Identity of ‘the People’
- Conclusion: Notes Towards a Theory of the Democratic Limit
- Endnotes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
This chapter will argue that what made the politics of national democratic revolution a nationalist politics was that it posited the citizen as necessarily a member of a nation – as a bearer, in other words, of some or other quality of population. To get sense of our task, let us begin this investigation with a well-known speech of Thabo Mbeki, given on behalf of the African National Congress on the occasion of the adoption of the Constitution in Cape Town in May 1996. In ‘I Am an African’, Mbeki states:
I owe my being to the Khoi and the San whose desolate souls haunt the great expanses of the beautiful Cape. … I am formed of the migrants who left Europe to find a new home on our native land. … In my veins courses the blood of the Malay slaves who came from the East. … I am the grandchild of the warrior men and women that Hintsa and Sekhukhune led, the patriots Cetshwayo and Mpephu took to battle, the soldiers Moshoeshoe and Ngungunyane taught never to dishonour the cause of freedom. My mind and my knowledge of myself is formed by the victories that are the jewels in our African crown, the victories we earned from Isandhlwana to Khartoum, as Ethiopians and as the Ashanti of Ghana, as the Berbers of the desert. I am the grandchild that lays fresh flowers on the Boer graves at St Helena and the Bahamas … I am the child of Nongqause. … I come from those who were transported from India and China (Mbeki, 1998: 31–32).
These lines, treating the identity of the African, are punctuated with the following declaration (and elsewhere, something very similar): ‘Being part of all these people, and in the knowledge that none dare contest the assertion, I shall claim that I am an African!’ (Mbeki, 1998: 32). Here Mbeki deliberately invokes a term that, in the context, is profoundly ambiguous. Why does he declare ‘I am an African’ instead of ‘I am a South African’? Why does his verse slide between allusions to the continent in general and to South Africa specifically? The South African people, that is, are also the people of the continent of Africa.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Do South Africans Exist?Nationalism, Democracy and the Identity of ‘The People’, pp. 99 - 120Publisher: Wits University PressPrint publication year: 2007