Sociology

The academic senates, which once governed the academic life of British universities, were often rocked to nightmare by contentious issues. These ranged from the important, for example, whether women should be admitted to a university, to the trivial, for example, whether students should be allowed to write with ball-point pens. Rarely, however, in my long experience, did senates address themselves to questions about the purposes of a university education and to questions about the inclusion of which subjects of study might or might not serve that purpose.

About thirty years ago, not long after the publication of Peter Winch's controversial book, The idea of a social science, the university of which I am a member, being then a new foundation in the diastole of its development, addressed itself to just that sort of question. For the question arose whether sociology should be added to the list of subjects appearing on the academic menu. The debates that ensued were, for our present purposes, enormously instructive. (A delicious glimpse of them is to be found in Malcolm Bradbury's novel The history man.)