Book contents
Conclusion: Spinoza vs Nietzsche
Summary
“Where is God?” he cried; “I'll tell you! We have killed him – you and I! We are all his murderers. But how did we do this? How were we able to drink up the sea? Who gave us the sponge to wipe away the entire horizon? What were we doing when we unchained this earth from its sun?”
(Nietzsche [1882] 2001: §125)NATURALISMS
Spinoza may have been the first philosopher to propose a metaphysical vision that so thoroughly integrates the deep reverence in ancient religion with the remorseless necessity of modern physics. He saw that nature is closed – no loopholes, no exceptions and no magic – and indifferent to our plight. But he also experienced something divine in nature that had been discerned as well in revealed religion, although not in full clarity. He proposed not a compromise, but an integration: yes, nature is as cold and indifferent as a mechanistic physics implies, and, yes, the light of scripture is an expression of the reverence due to nature. He asked that metaphysics and religion take a step forwards and together into a synthesis that preserved the essence of each.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Spinoza's Radical TheologyThe Metaphysics of the Infinite, pp. 131 - 142Publisher: Acumen PublishingPrint publication year: 2013