Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T09:17:39.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

Appendix: Shaftesbury and Bolingbroke

Get access

Summary

Anthony Ashley Cooper, third Earl of Shaftesbury (1671–1713) and Henry, Lord Bolingbroke (1678–1751) are sometimes included among the writers known as the English deists. It is probably better, however, to treat them as independent philosophers with their own substantive views and projects.

Many scholars have read Shaftesbury's writings to fit in with preconceived notions of ‘deism’. Shaftesbury's thought, however, is not well captured by this label. Even though he believed in a governing mind, there is little evidence that he ever thought of himself as a deist in an exclusive religious identity sense. At one stage he knew little about the ‘deism’ of those who called themselves deists, as a hitherto little noted passage reveals:

What is that which at present they call

Deism? The belief of a God? What God? A mind?

a real mind? universally presiding, acting?

present everywhere? … Is it this they understand? …

Be it so. It is well. But if it be anything less

than this … then let us hear what this idea is.

What Deism … What Deity? Of what is it they

talk to us? What nature? … Atoms and void.

A plain negative to Deity, fair and honest.

To Deism, still to pretence …

From whence then came this other pretence?

Who are these Deists? How assume this name?

By what title or pretence? …

What is this Deism they talk of? How does

it differ from mere Atheism? … Of what system then

are these Deists? Of Democritus and Epicurus they

are not. Peripatetics, Platonists, Pythagoreans,

Pyrrhonists. What?

Shaftesbury associated with Toland, Stephens and Molesworth in political campaigns in the 1690s. He admired Collins, distrusted Toland and was critical of Tindal. But this political association did not imply more than a limited philosophical convergence, mainly in the area of perfect theism and a secularizing deployment of Benjamin Whichcote's principles.

Type
Chapter
Information
Enlightenment and Modernity
The English Deists and Reform
, pp. 151 - 154
Publisher: Pickering & Chatto
First published in: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×