Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T01:25:12.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Stone Bladelets in Middle Woodland Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

George H. Odell
George H. Odell*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although true blade technologies were virtually unknown throughout the entire Archaic period of the American Midwest, they blossomed briefly during the Middle Woodland, but died out and were absent again during the rest of prehistory. Despite their temporal specificity, we have no idea why this technology developed. In the most intensive attempt so far to derive an answer to this question, Yerkes, at the Murphy site in Ohio, was able to conclude only that blades were used for a variety of tasks, just like bifaces or retouched flakes.

My own research sheds light on this problem, at least in the lower Illinois Valley of Illinois. I have applied intensive use-wear analyses to three Middle Woodland components: the Smiling Dan settlement and two different kinds of ceremonial manifestations from the Napoleon Hollow site. Bladelets were used very differently in these three situations. At the habitation they were relatively unimportant and were used for a variety of tasks, just as at the Murphy site. But in mortuary contexts they were numerically very significant and were employed for a restricted range of tasks—primarily for cutting and scraping soft materials. This conclusion suggests that the blade was an integral part of Hopewell ceremonialism.

Resumen

Resumen

Aunque las tecnologías de las verdaderas láminas fueron virtualmente desconocidas a lo largo del período Arcaico del medio oeste de Norteamérica, florecieron brevemente durante el peréodo Woodland Medio, pero desaparecieron gradualmente y estuvieron ausentes durante el resto de la prehistoria. A pesar de su especificidad temporal no tenemos idea del por qué se desarrolló esta tecnología. En el más intenso intento hasta ahora de encontrar una respuesta a esta pregunta, Yerkes, en el sitio Murphy en Ohio, sólo fue capaz de concluir que las láminas fueron utilizadas en una variedad de labores así como las lascas bifaciales o retocadas.

Mi investigación esparce luz sobre este problema, por lo menos en la parte baja del valle del Río Illinois, en el estado de Illinois. He aplicado un intenso análisis de uso a tres componentes del período Woodland Medio: el sitio Smiling Dan y dos tipos diferentes de manifestaciones ceremoniales del sitio de Napoleon Hollow. Las láminas fueron utilizadas de muy diferente manera en estas tres situaciones. En contextos de habitación, así como en el sitio Murphy, fueron relativamente de poca importancia, habiendo sido utilizadas en una variedad de labores. Pero en el contexto mortuorio éstas fueron numericamente muy significativas y fueron empleadas en una reducida escala de labores—primordialmente para cortar y raspar materiales suaves. Esta conclusión sugiere que la lámina fue una parte integral del ceremonialismo de los hopewell.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 102 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Andrefsky, W. Jr. 1987 Diffusion and Innovation from the Perspective of Wedge Shaped Cores in Alaska and Japan. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by Johnson, J. and Morrow, C., pp. 13–43. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. E. 1987 Technology and Economy : Microblade Core Production from the Channel Islands. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by Johnson, J. and Morrow, C., pp. 207–237. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Bordaz, J. 1970 Tools of the Old and New Stone Age. Natural History Press, Garden City, New York.Google Scholar
Brezillon, M. N. 1971 La denomination des objets depierre taillee. IVeme supplement to Gallia Prehistoire. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.Google Scholar
Charles, D. K., Leigh, S. R., and Buikstra, J. E. (editors) 1988 The Archaic and Woodland Cemeteries at the Elizabeth Site in the Lower Illinois Valley. Research Series Vol. 7. Center for American Archeology, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
Cole, F., and Deuel, T. 1937 Rediscovering Illinois. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Crabtree, D. E. 1972 An Introduction to Flintworking. Occasional Papers of the Museum No. 28. Idaho State University, Pocatello.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, K. B., and Walthall, J. B. 1983 In the Path of Progress : Development of Illinois Highway Archeology, and the FAP 408 Project. American Archeology 3 : 169–181.Google Scholar
Gramly, R. M., and Yahnig, C. 1991 The Adams Site (15Ch90) and the Little River, Christian County, Kentucky, Clovis Workshop Complex. Southeastern Archaeology 10 : 134–145.Google Scholar
Greber, N., Davis, R. S., and Fresne, A. S. Du 1981 The Micro Component of the Ohio Hopewell Lithic Technology : Bladelets. In The Research Potential of Anthropological Museum Collections, edited by Cantwell, A., Griffin, J, and Rothschild, N., pp. 489–528. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 346. New York.Google Scholar
Green, F. E. 1963 The Clovis Blades : An Important Addition to the Llano Complex. American Antiquity 29 : 145–165.Google Scholar
Grubb, T. C. 1981 Why Hopewell Cores and Bladelets? Ohio Archaeologist 31 : 18–19.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. 1884 Aboriginal Remains near Naples, Illinois. Smithsonian Institution, Annual Report of the Board of Regents for the Year 1882, pp. 686–721. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Johnson, J. K. 1987 Cahokia Core Technology in Mississippi : The View from the South. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by Johnson, J. and Morrow, C., pp. 187–205. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1970 Microblade Industries in the Japanese Archipelago. Arctic Anthropology 7 : 38–58.Google Scholar
Kvamme, K. L. 1988 A Simple Graphic Approach and Poor Man's Clustering Technique for Investigating Surface Lithic Scatter Types. Plains Anthropologist 33 : 385–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, S. R. 1988 Comparative Analysis of the Elizabeth Middle Woodland Artifact Assemblage. In The Archaic and Woodland Cemeteries at the Elizabeth Site in the Lower Illinois Valley, edited by Charles, D., Leigh, S, and Buikstra, J., pp. 191–217. Research Series Vol. 7. Center for American Archeology, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
Leigh, S. R., Charles, D. K., and Albertson, D. G. 1988 Middle Woodland Component. In The Archaic and Woodland Cemeteries at the Elizabeth Site in the Lower Illinois Valley, edited by Charles, D., Leigh, S, and Buikstra, J., pp. 41–84. Research Series Vol. 7. Center for American Archeology, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
McGimsey, C. R., Odell, G. H., and Wiant, M. D. 1986a Block IV Lithic Analysis. In Woodland Period Occupations of the Napoleon Hollow Site in the Lower Illinois Valley, edited by Wiant, M. and McGimsey, C., pp. 190–270. Research Series Vol. 6. Center for American Archeology, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
McGimsey, C. R., Odell, G. H., and Wiant, M. D. 1986b Block I Lithic Analysis. In Woodland Period Occupations of the Napoleon Hollow Site in the Lower Illinois Valley, edited by Wiant, M. and McGimsey, C., pp. 271–329. Research Series Vol. 6. Center for American Archeology, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. 1968 Microblades : A Long Standing Gulf of Georgia Tradition. American Antiquity 33 : 11–15.Google Scholar
Montet-White, A. 1963 Analytic Description of the Chipped Stone Industry from Snyders Site, Calhoun County, Illinois. In Miscellaneous Studies in Typology and Classification, edited by Montet-White, A., Binford, L., and Papworth, M., pp. 1–70. Anthropological Papers No. 19. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Montet-White, A. 1968 The Lithic Industries of the Illinois Valley in the Early and Middle Woodland Periods. Anthropological Papers No. 35. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Morrow, C. A. 1987 Blades and Cobden Chert : A Technological Argument for Their Role as Markers of Regional Identification During the Hopewell Period in Illinois. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by Johnson, J. and Morrow, C., pp. 119–149. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1977 The Application of Micro-wear Analysis to the Lithic Component of an Entire Prehistoric Settlement : Methods, Problems and Functional Reconstructions. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1979 A New and Improved System for the Retrieval of Functional Information from Microscopic Observations of Chipped Stone Tools. In Lithic Use-Wear Analysis, edited by Hayden, B., pp. 329–344. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1982a Functional Analysis of Lithic Artifacts in West-Central Illinois : Experiments and Systems Used. Report of Investigations No. 129. Contract Archeology Program, Center for American Archeology, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1982b The Typological System Employed to Process Lithic Artifacts from Sites on the FAP 408 Corridor. Report of Investigations No. 128. Contract Archeology Program, Center for American Archeology, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1984 Chert Availability in the Lower Illinois Valley : A Transect Sample. In Prehistoric Chert Exploitation : Studies from the Midcontinent, edited by Butler, B. M. and May, E. E., pp. 45–67. Occasional Paper No. 2. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1985 Microwear Analysis of Middle Woodland Lithics. In Smiling Dan : Structure and Function at a Middle Woodland Settlement in the Illinois Valley, edited by Stafford, B. and Sant, M., pp. 298–326. Research Series Vol. 2. Center for American Archeology, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1988 Preliminary Analysis of Lithic and Other Nonceramic Assemblages. In The Archaic and Woodland Cemeteries at the Elizabeth Site in the Lower Ilinois Valley, edited by Charles, D., Leigh, S, and Buikstra, J., pp. 155–190. Research Series Vol. 7. Center for American Archeology, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1994 Stones : Forager Mobility in the Illinois Valley. Manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology, University of Tulsa, Tulsa.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1980 Verifying the Reliability of Lithic Use-Wear Assessments by ‘Blind Tests‘ : The Low-Power Approach. Journal of Field Archaeology 7 : 87–120.Google Scholar
Pi Sunyer, O. 1965 The Flint Industry. In The McGraw Site : A Study in Hopewellian Dynamics, edited by Prufer, O., pp. 60–90. Scientific Publications of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History Vol. 4. Cleveland.Google Scholar
Reid, K. C. 1976 Prehistoric Trade in the Lower Missouri River Valley : An Analysis of Middle Woodland Bladelets. In Hopewellian Archaeology in the Lower Missouri Valley, edited by Johnson, A., pp. 63–99. Publications in Anthropology No. 8. University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Reynolds, T. E. G. 1986 Toward Peopling the New World : A Possible Early Paleolithic in Tohoku District, Japan. American Antiquity 51 : 330–332.Google Scholar
Smith, J. W. 1974 The Northeast Asian-Northwest American Microblade Tradition (NANAMT). Journal of Field Archaeology 1 : 347–364.Google Scholar
Stafford, B. D., and Sant, M. B. (editors) 1985 Smiling Dan : Structure and Function at a Middle Woodland Settlement in the Illinois Valley. Research Series Vol. 2. Center for American Archeology, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
Tixier, J. 1974 Glossary for the Description of Stone Tools with Special Reference to the Epipaleolithic of the Maghreb. Translated by Newcomer, M. H.. Special Publication No. 1. Newsletter of Lithic Technology, San Antonio.Google Scholar
Tixier, J. (editor) 1984 Prehistoire de la pierre taillee 2 : Economie du debitage laminaire. Cercle de Recherches et d'Etudes Prehistoriques, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.Google Scholar
Tringham, R., Cooper, G., Odell, G., Voytek, B., and Whitman, A. 1974 Experimentation in the Formation of Edge Damage : A New Approach to Lithic Analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 1 : 171–196.Google Scholar
Wiant, M. D., and McGimsey, C. R. (editors) 1986 Woodland Period Occupations of the Napoleon Hollow Site in the Lower Illinois Valley. Research Series Vol. 6. Center for American Archeology, Kampsville, Illinois.Google Scholar
Yerkes, R. W. 1990 Using Microwear Analysis to Investigate Domestic Activities and Craft Specialization at the Murphy Site, a Small Hopewell Settlement in Licking County, Ohio. In The Interpretive Possibilities of Microwear Studies, edited by Graslund, B., Knutsson, H., Knutsson, K., and Taffinder, J., pp. 167–176. AUN 14. Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar