Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T14:03:06.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On separated shear layers and the fractal geometry of turbulent scalar interfaces at large Reynolds numbers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2009

FAZLUL R. ZUBAIR  and
HARIS J. CATRAKIS
FAZLUL R. ZUBAIR
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
HARIS J. CATRAKIS*
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: catrakis@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work explores fractal geometrical properties of scalar turbulent interfaces derived from experimental two-dimensional spatial images of the scalar field in separated shear layers at large Reynolds numbers. The resolution of the data captures the upper three decades of scales enabling examination of multiscale geometrical properties ranging from the largest energy-containing scales to inertial scales. The data show a −5/3 spectral exponent over a wide range of scales corresponding to the inertial range in fully developed turbulent flows. For the fractal aspects, we utilize two methods as it is known that different methods may lead to different fractal aspects. We use the recently developed method for fractal analysis known as the Multiscale-Minima Meshless (M3) method because it does not require the use of grids. We also use the conventional box-counting approach as it has been frequently employed in various past studies. The outer scalar interfaces are identified on the basis of the probability density function (p.d.f.) of the scalar field. For the outer interfaces, the M3 method shows strong scale dependence of the generalized fractal dimension with approximately linear variation of the dimension as a function of logarithmic scale, for interface-fitting reference areas, but there is evidence of a plateau near a dimension D ~ 1.3 for larger reference areas. The conventional box-counting approach shows evidence of a plateau with a constant dimension also of D ~ 1.3, for the same reference areas. In both methods, the observed plateau dimension value agrees with other studies in different flow geometries. Scalar threshold effects are also examined and show that the internal scalar interfaces exhibit qualitatively similar behaviour to the outer interfaces. The overall range of box-counting fractal dimension values exhibited by outer and internal interfaces is D ~ 1.2–1.4. The present findings show that the fractal aspects of scalar interfaces in separated shear layers at large Reynolds number with −5/3 spectral behaviour can depend on the method used for evaluating the dimension and on the reference area. These findings as well as the utilities and distinctions of these two different definitions of the dimension are discussed in the context of multiscale modelling of mixing and the interfacial geometry.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 624 , 10 April 2009 , pp. 389 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aguirre, R. C. & Catrakis, H. J. 2005 On intermittency and the physical thickness of turbulent fluid interfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 540, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anselmet, F., Djeridi, H. & Fulachier, L. 1994 Joint statistics of a passive scalar and its dissipation in turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 280, 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonia, R. A. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 1977 Log-normality of temperature dissipation in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 20 (11), 1800–1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermejo-Moreno, I. & Pullin, D. I. 2008 On the non-local geometry of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 603, 101–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilger, R. W. 2004 Some aspects of scalar dissipation. Flow Turbul. Combust. 72, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisset, D. K., Hunt, J. C. & Rogers, M. M. 2002 The turbulent/non-turbulent interface bounding a far wake. J. Fluid Mech. 451, 381–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brethouwer, G., Hunt, J. C. R. & Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. 2003 Micro-structure and Lagrangian statistics of the scalar field with a mean gradient in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 474, 193–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catrakis, H. J. 2000 Distribution of scales in turbulence. Phys. Rev. E 62, 564–578.Google ScholarPubMed
Catrakis, H. J. 2004 Turbulence and the dynamics of fluid interfaces with applications to mixing and aero-optics. In Recent Research Developments in Fluid Dynamics, vol. 5, pp. 115–158. Transworld Research Network Publishers.Google Scholar
Catrakis, H. J. 2008 The multiscale-minima meshless (M3) method: a novel approach to level crossings and generalized fractals with applications to turbulent interfaces. J. Turbul. 9 (22), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catrakis, H. J., Aguirre, R. C. & Ruiz-Plancarte, J. 2002 a Area-volume properties of fluid interfaces in turbulence: scale-local self-similarity and cumulative scale dependence. J. Fluid Mech. 462, 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catrakis, H. J., Aguirre, R. C., Ruiz-Plancarte, J., Thayne, R. D., McDonald, B. A. & Hearn, J. W. 2002 b Large-scale dynamics in turbulent mixing and the three-dimensional space-time behaviour of outer fluid interfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 471, 381–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahm, W. J. A. & Southerland, K. B. 1997 Experimental assessment of Taylor's hypothesis and its applicability to dissipation estimates in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 9 (7), 2101–2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalziel, S. B., Linden, P. F. & Youngs, D. L. 1999 Self-similarity and internal structure of turbulence induced by Rayleigh–Taylor instability. J. Fluid Mech. 399, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasi, L. P., Schuerg, F. & Webster, D. R. 2007 The geometric properties of high-Schmidt-number passive scalar isosurfaces in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 588, 253–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimotakis, P. E. 2005 Turbulent mixing. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 37, 329–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, R. D., Dahm, W. J. A. & Dowling, D. R. 1996 Experimental assessment of fractal scale similarity in turbulent flows. Part 1. One-dimensional intersections. J. Fluid Mech. 327, 35–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, R. D., Dahm, W. J. A. & Dowling, D. R. 1997 Experimental assessment of fractal scale similarity in turbulent flows. Part 2. Higher-dimensional intersections and non-fractal inclusions. J. Fluid Mech. 338, 89–126.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, R. D., Dahm, W. J. A. & Dowling, D. R. 1998 Experimental assessment of fractal scale similarity in turbulent flows. Part 4. Effects of Reynolds and Schmidt numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 377, 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, D. D. & Preziosi, L. 1989 Heat waves. Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 41–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jumper, E. J. & Fitzgerald, E. J. 2001 Recent advances in aero-optics. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 37, 299–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyrazis, D. 1993 Optical degradation by turbulent free shear layers. Optical Diagnostics in Fluid and Thermal Flow (ed. Cha, S. S. & Trolinger, J. D.), pp. 170–181. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane-Serff, G. F. 1993 Investigation of the fractal structure of jets and plumes. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 521–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latz, M. I., Juhl, A. R., Ahmed, A. M., Elghobashi, S. E. & Rohr, J. 2004 Hydrodynamic stimulation of dinoflagellate bioluminescence: a computational and experimental study. J. Exp. Bio. 207, 1941–1951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandelbrot, B. B. 1975 On the geometry of homogeneous turbulence, with stress on the fractal dimension of the isosurfaces of scalars. J. Fluid Mech. 72 (2), 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 1991 The multifractal nature of turbulent energy dissipation. J. Fluid Mech. 224, 429–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, S. & Foss, J. 2003 Turbulent boundary layer to single-stream shear layer: the transition region. J. Fluid Mech. 494, 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 1988 Evolution of surfaces in turbulence. Intl J. Engng Sci. 26, 445–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, R. R. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 1990 Quantitative three-dimensional imaging and the structure of passive scalar fields in fully turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 216, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queiros-Conde, D. 2003 A diffusion equation to describe scale- and time-dependent dimensions of turbulent interfaces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 459, 3043–3059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, J. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 2003 Geometric features of the mixing of passive scalars at high Schmidt numbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 4501–4504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schumacher, J., Sreenivasan, K. R. & Yeung, P. K. 2005 Very fine structures in scalar mixing. J. Fluid Mech. 531, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. 1985 On the fine-scale intermittency of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 151, 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. 1991 Fractals and multifractals in fluid turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 23, 539–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. 1999 Fluid turbulence. Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S383–S395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. 2004 Possible effects of small-scale intermittency in turbulent reacting flows. Flow Turbul. Combust. 72, 115–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. & Meneveau, C. 1986 The fractal facets of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 173, 357–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R., Prabhu, A. & Narasimha, R. 1983 Zero-crossings in turbulent signals. J. Fluid Mech. 137, 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R. & Prasad, R. R. 1989 New results on the fractal and multifractal structure of the large Schmidt number passive scalars in fully turbulent flows. Physica D 38, 322–329.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R., Ramshankar, R. & Meneveau, C. 1989 Mixing, entrainment and fractal dimensions of surfaces in turbulent flows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 421, 79–108.Google Scholar
Stanek, M., Raman, G., Ross, J. A., Odedra, J., Peto, J., Alvi, F. & Kibens, V. June 2002 High frequency acoustic suppression: the role of mass flow, the notion of superposition, and the role of inviscid instability. In American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) 8th Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2002–2404, Breckenridge, CO.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, L. K. & Clemens, N. T. 1999 Planar measurements of the full three-dimensional scalar dissipation rate in gas-phase turbulent flows. Exp. Fluids 27, 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takayasu, H. 1982 Differential fractal dimension of random walk and its applications to physical systems. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 51, 3057–3064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurber, M. C. & Hanson, R. K. 1999 Pressure and composition dependences of acetone laser-induced fluorescence with excitation at 248, 266, and 308 nm. Appl. Phys. B 69, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trouvé, A. & Poinsot, T. 1994 The evolution equation for the flame surface density in turbulent premixed combustion. J. Fluid Mech. 278, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villermaux, E. & Innocenti, C. 1999 On the geometry of turbulent mixing. J. Fluid Mech. 393, 123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warhaft, Z. 2000 Passive scalars in turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 32, 203–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar