Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T21:34:21.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constituency, multi-functionality and grammaticalization in Halliday's Functional Grammar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Rodney Huddleston
Rodney Huddleston
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , March 1988 , pp. 137 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, A. (1985). The major functions of the noun phrase. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. 162–154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bazell, C. E. (1973). Review of J. Lyons (ed.), New horizons in linguistics. JL 9. 198–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, C. S. (1985). Systemic linguistics: theory and applications. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17. 241–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1963). Class in relation to the axes of chain and choice in language. Linguistics 2. 5–15.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1966a). The concept of rank: a reply. JL 2. 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1966b). Types of structure. London: University College (mimeo). Also in Halliday & Martin (1981), 29–41.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967–1968). Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Parts 1, 2 and 3. JL 3. 37–81, 199–244 and 4. 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J. R. (eds) (1981). Readings in systemic linguistics. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. A. (1986). Systemic grammar. [Review article.] Linguistics 24. 791–815.Google Scholar
Kress, G. R. (ed.) (1976). System and function in language: selected papers by M. A. K. Halliday. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1966). The concept of rank in ‘Neo-Firthian’ grammar. JL 2. 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1981). Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar