Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:08:06.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accounting practices in medical interviews1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Sue Fisher  and
Stephen B. Groce
Sue Fisher
Affiliation:
Sociology Department/Science in Society Program, Wesleyan University
Stephen B. Groce
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Western Kentucky University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As doctors and patients communicate during medical interactions they both offer accounts and respond to them. By treating these accounts as interactional strategies which link social structure to social interaction we display how the medical interview is characterized by a moment-to-moment battle that mirrors and largely sustains the institutional authority and status of doctors and the reality of genders. (Medicine, communication, accounting practices, interactional strategies, institutional authority, professional status, gender)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 225 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Davis, K. (1988). Power under the microscope: Toward a grounded theory of gender relations in medical encounters. Battle Creek, MI: Foris.Google Scholar
Felson, R. B., & Ribner, K. A. (1981). An attributional approach to accounts and sanctions for criminal behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly 44(2): 137–42.Google Scholar
Fisher, S. (1984). Doctor-patient communication: A social and micro-political performance. Sociology of Health and Illness 6(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, S. (1986). In the patient's best interest: Women and the politics of medical decisions. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, S., & Groce, S. B. (1985). Doctor-patient negotiation of cultural assumptions. Sociology of Health and Illness 7(3): 342–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, S., & Todd, A. D. (eds.) (1983). The social organization of doctor-patient communication. Washington, DC: The Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fisher, S., & Todd, A. D. (1986). Discourse and institutional authority: Medicine, education, and law. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Freidson, E. (1970). Profession of medicine. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological methods. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1983). Profiles and critique in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1956). The nature of difference and demeanor. American Anthropologist 58: 473–502.Google Scholar
Groce, S. B. (1986). Medical interviews, treatment decisions, and the social construction of reality: An analysis of doctor-patient communication. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henley, N. (1975). Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. In Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 184–202.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. New York: Polity.Google Scholar
Jourard, S. M., & Lasakow, P. (1958). Some factors in self disclosure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 56: 91–98.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K., & Cicourel, A. V. (eds.) (1981). Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mechanic, D. (1968). Medical sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H. (1983). The role of language and the language of role in institutional decision-making. Language in Society 12: 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H., Meihls, L., & Hertwick, A. (1986). Handicapping the handicapped. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mehan, H., & Wood, H. (1975). The reality of ethnomethodology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. (1981). Situated actions and vocabularies of motives. In Stone, G. P. & Farberman, H. A. (eds.), Social psychology through symbolic interactions. New York: Wiley. 325–32.Google Scholar
Mishler, E. G. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialecters of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Molotch, H., & Boden, D. (1985). Talking social structure: Discourse, domination, and the Watergate hearings. American Sociological Review 50(3): 273–88.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 696–735.Google Scholar
Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1981). Accounts. In Stone, G. P. & Farberman, H. A. (eds.), Social psychology through symbolic interaction. New York: Wiley. 343–61.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, R., & Hewitt, J. (1976). Aligning actions. American Sociological Review 41: 838–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, A. D. (1983). A diagnosis of doctor-patient discourse in the prescription of contraception. In Fisher, S. & Todd, A. D. (eds.), The social organization of doctor-patient communication. Washington, DC: The Center for Applied Linguistics. 159–87.Google Scholar
Todd, A. D. (1989). Intimate adversaries: Cultural conflicts between doctors and women patients. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Treichler, P. A. et al. , (1984). Problems and problems: Power relationships in medical encounters. In Kramarae, C., Schulz, M., & O'Barr, W. (eds.), Language and power. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 63–78.Google Scholar
Waitzkin, H. B. (1983). The second sickness: Contradictions of capitalist health care. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
West, C. (1984). Routine complications: Troubles with talk between doctors and patients. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1977). Women's place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent-child interaction. Social Problems 24: 521–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions, and silences in conversation. In Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 105–29.Google Scholar
Zola, I. K. (1972). Medicine as an institution of social control. Sociological Review. New Series 20: 487–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed