Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T13:14:46.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Excavation of the Lower Palaeolithic Site at Amey's Eartham Pit, Boxgrove, West Sussex: A Preliminary Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

M. B. Roberts
Affiliation:
Field Archaeology Unit, Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London, WC1H 0PY, England
M. R. Bates
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Royal Holloway and Bedford New College, Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey, England
C. Bergman
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, England
A. P. Currant
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England
J. R. Haynes
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Llandinam Building, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DB, Wales
R. Macphail
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, England
A. McConnell
Affiliation:
Victoria Archaeological Survey, Albert Park, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
R. Scaife
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, England
R. Unger-Hamilton
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, England
R. C. Whatley
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Llandinam Building, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DB, Wales

Abstract

The acheulian site at Boxgrove contains one of the most extensive areas of in situ fauna and flintwork yet discovered in Britain. This material is found in a complex sequence of sediments which represent depositional conditions from a 42 m sea level rise to the onset of a full periglacial climate. Excavation of the archaeological horizon has been accompanied by a programme of multidisciplinary research examining site formation processes, palaeolandscape and palaeoecological development, using sedimentological and environmental reconstruction techniques. Dating of the site is tentative as no absolute dates are available at present. However, comparative analysis with other British sites would suggest a position for the Boxgrove sequence within the Middle Pleistocene. The archaeological horizon is interpreted as being deposited towards the latter part of an interglacial or an interstadial period.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

ApSimon, A. M., Gamble, C. S. and Shackley, M. L., 1976. ‘Pleistocene raised beaches on Portsdown, Hampshire’, Proc. Hampsh. Field Club Archaeol. Soc. 33, 1732.Google Scholar
Avery, B. W. and Bascomb, C. L. (eds), 1974. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods. Soil Survey Technical Monograph 6, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Bergman, C. A., Barton, R. N. E., Collcutt, S. N. and Morris, G., 1983. ‘La fracture voluntaire dans une industrie du Paléolithique Supérieur Tardif du Sud de l'Angleterre’, L'Anthropologie 87, 323–37.Google Scholar
Bishop, M. J., 1982. ‘The mammal fauna of the Early Middle Pleistocene cavern infill site of Westbury-Sub-Mendip, Somerset’, Special Papers in Palaeontology 28, 1108.Google Scholar
Bordes, F., ‘Étude comparative des différentes techniques de taille du silex et des roches dures’, L'Anthropologie 51, 129.Google Scholar
Bordes, F., 1979. Typologie du Paléolithique Ancien et Moyen. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.Google Scholar
Bradley, B. and Sampson, C. G., 1978. ‘Artefacts from the Cottages Site’, in Sampson, C. G. (ed.), Palaeoecology and Archaeology of an Acheulian Site at Caddington, England, 83137, S.M.U. Press, Dallas.Google Scholar
Bullock, P., Federoff, N., Jongerius, A., Stoops, G. and Tirsina, T., 1985. Handbook for Soil Thin Section Description. Waine Research Publication, Wolverhampton.Google Scholar
Bunn, H., Harms, J. W. K., Isaac, G., Kaufulu, Z., Kroll, E., Schick, K., Toth, N. and Behrensmeyer, A. K., 1980. ‘FXJj50, an Early Pleistocene Site in Northern Kenya’, World Archaeol. 12, 109–36.Google Scholar
Calkin, J. B., 1934. ‘Implements from the Higher Raised Beaches of Sussex’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. East Anglia 7, 333–47.Google Scholar
Calkin, J. B. and Green, J. F. N., 1949, ‘Palaeoliths and terraces near Bournemouth’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 15, 2137.Google Scholar
Catt, J. A., 1979. ‘Soils and Quaternary geology in Britain’, J. Soil Science 30, 607–42.Google Scholar
Chartres, C. J. and Whalley, W. B., 1975. ‘Evidence for Later Quaternary solution of the chalk at Basingstoke, Hampshire’, Proc. Geol. Assoc. 86, 365–72.Google Scholar
Everard, C. E., 1954. ‘The Solent River. A geomorphological study’, Trans. Inst. Brit. Geog. 20, 4158.Google Scholar
Federoff, N. and Goldberg, P., 1982. ‘Comparative micromorphology of two Late Pleistocene palaeosols (in the Parish Basin)’, Catena 9, 227–51.Google Scholar
Fowler, G., 1932. ‘The 100′ raised beach between Arundel and Chichester, Sussex’, Quart. J. Soc. London 88, 8497.Google Scholar
Gamble, C. S. and ApSimon, A. M., forthcoming. ‘An acheulian site at Red Barns, Porchester, Hampshire.Google Scholar
Hall, S. A., 1981. ‘Deteriorated pollen grains and the interpretation of Quaternary pollen diagrams’, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 32, 193206.Google Scholar
Headon-Davies, K., 1984. Amino-stratigraphy of British Pleistocene Beach Deposits. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University College Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Headon-Davies, K. and Keen, D. H., 1985. ‘The Age of the Pleistocene marine deposits at Portland, Dorset’, Proc. Geol. Assoc. 75, 547–62.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. M., 1967. Soils of the West Sussex Coastal Plain. Soil Survey of Great Britain, Bulletin No. 3, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. M., 1974. Soil Survey Field Handbook. Soil Survey Technical Monograph No. 5, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. M., Rayner, J. H. and Catt, J. A., 1974. ‘The geomorphological significance of the Clay-with-flints on the South Downs’, Trans. Inst. Brit. Geog. 61, 119–29.Google Scholar
Holyoak, D. T. and Preece, R., 1983. ‘Evidence of a high Middle Pleistocene sea-level from estuarine deposits at Bembridge, Isle of Wight, England’, Proc. Geol. Assoc. 94, 231–44.Google Scholar
Holyoak, D. T. and Seddon, M. P., 1984. ‘Devensian and Flandrian fossiliferous deposits in the Nene Valley, Central England’, Mercian Geologist 9, 127–50.Google Scholar
Jones, D. K. C., 1981. Southeast and Southern England. Methuen.Google Scholar
Kearney, M. P. and Cameron, R. A. D., 1979. A Field Guide to the Land Snails of Britain and North West Europe. Collins.Google Scholar
Keeley, L. H., 1980. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A microwear analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Keen, D. H., 1979. ‘The environment of deposition of the South Hampshire Plateau Gravels’, Proc. Hampsh. Field Club Archaeol. Soc. 36, 1524.Google Scholar
Kellaway, G. A., Redding, H. J., Shephard-Thorn, E. R. and Destombes, J. P., 1975. ‘The Quaternary history of the English Channel’, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. (A) 229, 189218.Google Scholar
Koenigswald, W. von, 1973. ‘Veränderungen in der Kleinsauger-fauna von Mitteleuropa zwischen Cromer und Eem (Pleistozän)’, Eiszeitalter Gegenwort 23–24, 159–67.Google Scholar
Lautridou, J. P. (ed.), 1984. The Quaternary of Normandy. Bulletin, Centre de Geomorphologie, Caen.Google Scholar
Loveland, P. J., 1981. ‘Weathering of a soil glauconite in Southern England’, Geoderma 25, 3554.Google Scholar
MacPhail, R. I., 1986a. ‘Palaeosols in archaeology; their role in understanding Flandrian pedogenesis’, in Wright, V. P. (ed.), Palaeosols, 263–89. Blackwells.Google Scholar
MacPhail, R. I., 1986b. ‘A review of soil science in archaeology in England’, in Keeley, H. C. M. (ed.), Environmental Archaeology: a regional review, Vol. 2, 332–79. H.B.M.C. Occasional Paper.Google Scholar
Miedema, R., Jongmans, A. G. and Slager, S., 1974. ‘Micromorphological observations on Pyrite and its oxidation products in four Holocene soils in the Netherlands’, in Rutherford, S. K. (ed.), Soil Microscopy, 772–94. Limestone Press, Kingston, Ontario.Google Scholar
Newcomer, M. H., 1971. ‘Some quantitative experiments in handaxe manufacture’, World Archaeol., 3, 8594.Google Scholar
Newcomer, M. H. and Sieveking, G. de G., 1980. ‘Experimental flake scatter-patterns: a new interpretive technique’, J. Field Archaeol. 7, 345–51.Google Scholar
Newcomer, M. H., Grace, R. and Unger-Hamilton, R., 1986. ‘Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests’, J. Archaeol. Sci. 13, 207–13.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. and Curwen, E.C., 1937. ‘The relationship of the Coombe Rock to the 135′ raised beach at Slindon, Sussex’, Proc. Geol. Assoc. 48, 317–13.Google Scholar
Ohnuma, K. and Bergman, C. A., 1982. ‘Experimental studies in the determination of flaking mode’, Bull. Inst. Archaeol. London 19, 161–70.Google Scholar
Palmer, L. S. and Cooke, J. H., 1923. ‘The Pleistocene deposits of the Portsmouth district and their relationship to man’, Proc. Geol. Assoc. 34, 253–82.Google Scholar
Roe, D. A., 1981. The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Period in Britain. London.Google Scholar
Shephard-Thorn, E. R. and Wymer, J. J., 1977. South East England and the Thames Valley. X INQUA Congress, guide book for excursion A5.Google Scholar
Shephard-Thorn, E. R. and Kellaway, G. A., 1978. ‘Quaternary deposits at Eartham, West Sussex’, Brighton Polytechnic Geog. Soc. Mag. 4, 18.Google Scholar
Singer, R., Wymer, J. J., Gladfelter, B. G. and Wolff, R., 1973. ‘Excavation of the Clactonian industry at the Golf Course, Clacton-on-Sea, Essex’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 39, 674.Google Scholar
Stuart, A. J. and West, R. G., 1976. ‘Late Cromerian Fauna and Flora at Ostend, Norfolk’, Geol. Mag. 113, 469–73.Google Scholar
Stuart, A. J., 1982. Pleistocene Vertebrates in the British Isles. Longmans.Google Scholar
Swanson, E. H., 1970. ‘Pleistocene geochronology in the New Forest, Hampshire’, Bull. Inst. Archaeol. London 8, 55100.Google Scholar
Tringham, R., Cooper, G., Odell, G., Voytek, B. and Whitman, A., 1974. ‘Experimentation in the formation of edge damage: a new approach to lithic analysis’, J. Field Archaeol. 1, 171–96.Google Scholar
Turner, C., 1970. ‘The Middle Pleistocene deposits at Marks Tey, Essex’, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London (B) 257, 273440.Google Scholar
Turner, C., 1984. ‘Problems and pitfalls in the application of palynology to Pleistocene archaeological sites in Western Europe’, in Palynologie Archéologique, 347–73. Centre de Recherches Archeologiques, Notes et Monographies Techniques, No. 17.Google Scholar
Unger-Hamilton, R., 1984. Method in Microwear Analysis: Sickle-blades and other tools from Syria. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Waechter, J. d'A., 1973. ‘The Late Middle Acheulian industries in the Swanscombe area’, in Strong, D.E. (ed.), Archaeological Theory and Practice, 6786. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Wenben-Smith, F., 1985. Analysis of experimentally produced flint debitage and on-site application of results. Unpublished B.A Dissertation, Institute of Archaeology, University of London.Google Scholar
West, R. G., 1956. ‘The Quaternary deposits at Hoxne, Suffolk’, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London (B) 239, 265356.Google Scholar
West, R. G. and Sparks, B. W., 1960. ‘Coastal Interglacial deposits of the English Channel’, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London (B) 243, 95113.Google Scholar
West, R. G., Devoy, R. J. N., Funnell, B. M. and Robinson, J. E., 1984. ‘Pleistocene deposits at Earnley, Bracklesham Bay, Sussex’, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London (B) 306, 135–57.Google Scholar
Williams, R. B. G. and Robinson, D. A., 1983. ‘The landforms of Sussex’, in The Geographical Editorial Committee, Sussex: Environment, Landscape and Society. Sutton.Google Scholar
Woodcock, A. G., 1981. The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic Periods in Sussex. British Archaeological Reports 94, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wymer, J. J., 1981. The Palaeolithic Age. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar