Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T14:24:44.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sexual dimorphism and paleoecology in Teleoceras, a North American Miocene rhinoceros

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Alfred J. Mead
Alfred J. Mead*
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska State Museum and Department of Geosciences, W436 Nebraska Hall, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0514
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism is documented in 35 articulated adult skeletons, 24 females, and 11 males, of the Miocene rhinoceros Teleoceras major from Ashfall Fossil Beds, Nebraska. Morphometric analysis of 51 cranial, mandibular, forelimb, and hindlimb characters reveals larger male mean values in 50 of the 51 measurements, of which 23 are significantly different (p ≤ 0.01). The most clearly dimorphic feature is the i2 diameter. The dimorphism evident in additional mandibular and cranial characters is conservative when compared with the dimorphism present in the fore- and hindlimbs. Non-overlapping male and female ranges are recorded for humerus length, radius length, radius proximal width, and femur length, with corresponding dimorphism ratios (DR = male ÷ female) of 1.11, 1.12, 1.11, and 1.10. Maximum male longbone lengths exceed minimum female lengths by an average of 24% (20–29%). Developmental maturity is apparently asynchronous in T. major, with fusion of longbone epiphyses delayed a minimum of two relative adult age classes in males. Significant sexual dimorphism is evident in the radius (DR = 1.34) and femur (DR = 1.19) cross-sectional areas. Estimates of body mass suggest a DR value between 1.13 and 1.23. The cranial, mandibular, and body-size dimorphism in T. major approaches that seen in the extant rhinoceroses Ceratotherium simum and Rhinoceros unicornis. However, the apparent herd structure and breeding-age sex ratio for the Ashfall herd suggests a behavioral ecology for T. major different from that of extant rhinoceroses. Teleoceras was likely a herding polygynous species ecologically more similar to extant Hippopotamus amphibius of Africa.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , Fall 2000 , pp. 689 - 706
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alexander, R. D., Hoogland, J. L., Howard, R. D., Noonan, K. M., and Sherman, P. W. 1979. Sexual dimorphism and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates, and humans. Pp. 402–435in Chagnon, N. A. and Irons, W., eds. Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: an anthropological perspective. Duxbury, North Scituate, Mass.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. McN., Jayes, A. S., Maloiy, G. M. O., and Wathuta, E. M. 1979. Allometry of the limb bones of mammals from shrews (Sorex) to elephant (Loxodonta). Journal of Zoology 189:305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. F., Hall-Martin, A., and Russell, D. A. 1985. Long-bone circumference and weight in mammals, birds and dinosaurs. Journal of Zoology 207:53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. 1983a. Ecology and catastrophic mortality in wild horses: implications for interpreting fossil assemblages. Science 220:1403–1404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, J. 1983b. Predation, sex ratios, and male competition in equids (Mammalia: Perissodactyla). Journal of Zoology 201:205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. 1994. Science, conservation, and black rhinos. Journal of Mammalogy 75:298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J., and Cunningham, C. 1994. Bison: mating and conservation in small populations. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Berger, J., and Cunningham, C. 1998. Natural variation in horn size and social dominance and their importance to the conservation of black rhinoceros. Conservation Biology 12:708–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsuk-Bialynicka, M. 1973. Studies on the Pleistocene rhinoceros Coelodonta antiquitatis (Blumenbach). Palaeontologia Polonica 29:1–95.Google Scholar
Cerdeno, E. 1995. Cladistic analysis of the family Rhinocerotidae (Perissodactyla). American Museum Novitates 3143:1–25.Google Scholar
Coombs, M. C. 1975. Sexual dimorphism in chalicotheres (Mammalia, Perissodactyla). Systematic Zoology 24:55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, E. D. 1879. On the extinct American rhinoceroses and their allies. American Naturalist 13:771a–771j.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damuth, J. 1990. Problems in estimating body masses of archaic ungulates using dental measurements. Pp. 229–253in Damuth, and MacFadden, 1990.Google Scholar
Damuth, J., and MacFadden, B. J., eds. 1990. Body size in mammalian paleobiology: estimation and biological implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dinerstein, E. 1991. Sexual dimorphism in the Greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis). Journal of Mammalogy 72:450–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltringham, S. K. 1999. The hippos, natural history and conservation. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Fortelius, M. 1985. Ungulate cheek teeth: development, functional, and evolutionary interrelations. Acta Zoologica Fennica 180:1–76.Google Scholar
Fortelius, M., and Kappelman, J. 1993. The largest land mammal ever imagined. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 107:85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, G. H., and King, J. M. 1969. Relations amongst various linear measurements and weight for black rhinoceroses in Kenya. East African Wildlife Journal 7:67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1981. Variation, sexual dimorphism, and social structure in the early Eocene horse Hyracotherium (Mammalia, Perissodactyla). Paleobiology 7:443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, J. 1966. Mating and courtship of the black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis L.). East African Wildlife Journal 4:69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, J. 1970. Age criteria and vital statistics of a black rhinoceros population. East African Wildlife Journal 8:105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, C. P. 1972. Ceratotherium simum. Mammalian Species 8:1–6.Google Scholar
Groves, C. P. 1982. The skulls of Asian rhinoceroses: wild and captive. Zoo Biology 1:251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groves, C. P., and Kurt, F. 1972. Dicerorhinus sumatrensis. Mammalian Species 21:1–6.Google Scholar
Hamilton, P. H., and King, J. M. 1969. The fate of black rhinoceroses released in Nairobi National Park. East African Wildlife Journal 7:73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. A., and Manning, E. M. 1983. Extreme carpal variability in Teleoceras (Rhinocerotidae, Mammalia). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 3:58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, E. 1913. The white rhinoceros. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 61:1–77.Google Scholar
Hillman-Smith, A. K. K., and Groves, C. P. 1994. Diceros bicornis. Mammalian Species 455:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman-Smith, A. K. K., Owen-Smith, N., Anderson, J. L., Hall-Martin, A. J., and Selaladi, J. P. 1986. Age estimation of the White rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum). Journal of Zoology 210:355–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, A. B. 1965. Speed in animals: their specialization for running and leaping. Hafner, London.Google Scholar
Janis, C. M. 1990. Correlation of cranial and dental variables with body size in ungulates and macropodoids. Pp. 255–299in Damuth, and MacFadden, 1990.Google Scholar
Jarman, P. 1983. Mating system and sexual dimorphism in large, terrestrial, mammalian herbivores. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 58:485–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurten, B. 1969. Sexual dimorphism in fossil mammals. In Westermann, G. E. G., ed. Sexual dimorphism in fossil Metazoa and taxonomic implications. International Union of Geological Sciences A 1:226–233.Google Scholar
Laurie, A. 1982. Behavioural ecology of the Greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis). Journal of Zoology 196:307–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurie, W. A., Long, E. M., and Groves, C. P. 1983. Rhinoceros unicornis. Mammalian Species 211:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, S. 1986. Analysis of mammalian communities from the late Eocene and Oligocene of Southern France. Palaeovertebrata 16:191–212.Google Scholar
Loose, H. 1975. Pleistocene Rhinocerotidae of W. Europe with reference to the recent two-horned species of Africa and S.E. Asia. Scripta Geologica 33:1–59.Google Scholar
MacFadden, B. J. 1998. Tale of two rhinos: isotopic ecology, paleodiet, and niche differentiation of Aphelops and Teleoceras from the Florida Neogene. Paleobiology 24:274–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFadden, B. J., and Hulbert, R. C. 1990. Body size estimates and size distribution of ungulate mammals from the Late Miocene Love Bone Bed of Florida. Pp. 337–363in Damuth, and MacFadden, 1990.Google Scholar
Matthew, W. D. 1932. A review of the rhinoceroses with a description of Aphelops material from the Pliocene of Texas. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 22:411–480.Google Scholar
Mead, A. J. 1999. Enamel hypoplasia in Miocene rhinoceroses (Teleoceras) from Nebraska: evidence of severe physiological stress. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19:393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihlbachler, M. C. 1999. Population structure and implications for social behavior in Miocene Florida rhinoceroses. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 19(3):64A.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1898. A complete skeleton of Teleoceras fossiger. Notes upon the growth and sexual characters of this species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 10:51–59.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1903. The extinct rhinoceroses. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History 1(3):75–164.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1929. The titanotheres of ancient Wyoming, Dakota, and Nebraska. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph 55:1–953.Google Scholar
Owen-Smith, R. N. 1988. Megaherbivores: the influence of very large body size on ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, O. A. 1920. The American Diceratheres. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum 7:399–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, R. I. 1946. A sexual difference in the skulls of Asiatic rhinoceroses. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 115:319–322.Google Scholar
Prins, H. H. T. 1996. Ecology and behaviour of the African Buffalo: social inequalities and decision making. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prothero, D. R. 1998. Rhinocerotidae. Pp. 595–605in Janis, C. M., Scott, K. M., and Jacobs, L. L., eds. Evolution of Tertiary mammals of North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R., and Manning, E. 1987. Miocene rhinoceroses from the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain. Journal of Paleontology 61:388–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prothero, D. R., and Sereno, P. C. 1982. Allometry and paleoecology of medial Miocene dwarf rhinoceroses from the Texas Gulf Coastal Plain. Paleobiology 8:16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prothero, D. R., Manning, E., and Hanson, C. B. 1986. The phylogeny of the Rhinocerotoidea (Mammalia, Perissodactyla). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 87:341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachlow, J. L., and Berger, J. 1997. Conservation implications of patterns of horn regeneration in dehorned white rhinos. Conservation Biology 11:84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachlow, J. L., Berkeley, E. V., and Berger, J. 1998. Correlates of male mating strategies in white rhinos (Ceratotherium simum). Journal of Mammalogy 79:1317–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radinsky, L. 1963. Origin and early evolution of North American Tapiroidea. Peabody Museum of Natural History Bulletin 17:1–106.Google Scholar
Radinsky, L. 1967. Hyrachyus, Chasmotherium, and the early evolution of helaletid tapiroids. American Museum Novitates 2313:1–23.Google Scholar
Scott, K. M. 1990. Postcranial dimensions of ungulates as predictors of body mass. Pp. 301–335in Damuth, and MacFadden, 1990.Google Scholar
Scott, W. B. 1941. Perissodactyla. The mammalian fauna of the White River Oligocene. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 28:747–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A. R. E. 1977. The African Buffalo: a study of resource limitation of populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Tanner, L. G. 1975. Stratigraphic occurrences of Teleoceras, with a new Kimballian species from Nebraska. Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum 10:23–33.Google Scholar
von den Driesch, A. 1976. A guide to the measurements of animal bones from archaeological sites. Peabody Museum Bulletin 1:1–136.Google Scholar
Voorhies, M. R. 1985. A Miocene rhinoceros herd buried in volcanic ash. Research Reports, National Geographic Society 19:671–688.Google Scholar
Voorhies, M. R. 1990. Vertebrate paleontology of the proposed Norden Reservoir Area, Brown, Cherry, and Keya Paha Counties, Nebraska. Division of Archeological Research, Department of Anthropology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Technical Report 82–09:A1–A275.Google Scholar
Voorhies, M. R., and Stover, S. G. 1978. An articulated fossil skeleton of a pregnant rhinoceros, Teleoceras major Hatcher. Proceedings, Nebraska Academy of Sciences 88:47–48.Google Scholar
Voorhies, M. R., and Thomasson, J. R. 1979. Fossil grass anthoecia within Miocene rhinoceros skeletons: diet of an extinct species. Science 206:331–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, S. D. 1969. The Burge and Minnechaduza Clarendonian mammalian faunas of north-central Nebraska. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 78:1–191.Google Scholar
Webb, S. D. 1983. The rise and fall of the Late Miocene ungulate fauna in North America. Pp. 267–306in Nitecki, M. H., ed. Coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Wood, H. E. 1938. Causal factors in shortening tooth series with age. Journal of Dental Research 17:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. B. 1993. Evolution of sexually dimorphic characters in peccaries (Mammalia, Tayassuidae). Paleobiology 19:52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar