Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:31:12.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statistical methods for paleodemography on fossil assemblages having small numbers of specimens: an investigation of dinosaur survival rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

David Steinsaltz  and
Steven Hecht Orzack
David Steinsaltz
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Oxford University, One South Parks Road, Oxford, England OX1 3TG
Steven Hecht Orzack*
Affiliation:
Fresh Pond Research Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140. E-mail: orzack@freshpond.org
*
∗Corresponding author
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe statistical methods to formulate and validate statements about survival rates given a small number of individuals. These methods allow one to estimate the age-specific survival rate and assess its uncertainty, to assess whether the survival rates during some age range differ from the survival rates during another age range, and to assess whether the survivorship curve has a particular shape. We illustrate these methods by applying them to a sample of 22 Albertosaurus sarcophagus individuals. We show that this sample is too small to provide any confidence in the claim that this species had a “convex” survivorship curve arising from age-specific survival rates that decreased monotonically with age. However, we show that a sample of 50 to 100 individuals has reasonable statistical power to support such a claim. There is evidence for the much weaker claim that average survival rates for ages 2 to 15 were higher than survival rates for later ages. Finally, we describe one way to account for size-dependent fossilization rates and show that a plausible positively-size-dependent fossilization rate results in a substantially non-convex survivorship curve for A. sarcophagus.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , Winter 2011 , pp. 113 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Agresti, A., and Coull, B. A. 1998. Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. American Statistician 52:119–126.Google Scholar
Barlow, R. E., Bartholomew, D. J., Bremner, J. M., and Brunk, H. D. 1972. Statistical inference under order restrictions: the theory and application of isotonic regression. Wiley, London.Google Scholar
Bickel, P. J., and Doksum, K. 1969. Tests for monotone failure rate based on normalized spacings. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 40:1216–1235.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R., and Oakes, D. 1984. Analysis of survival data. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Deevey, E. S. Jr. 1947. Life tables for natural populations of animals. Quarterly Review of Biology 22:283–314.Google Scholar
Durot, C. 2008. Testing convexity or concavity of a cumulated hazard rate. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 57:465–473.Google Scholar
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. 1986. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statistical Science 1:54–77.Google Scholar
Erickson, G. M., Makovicky, P. J., Currie, P. J., Norell, M. A., Yerby, S. A., and Brochu, C. A. 2004. Gigantism and comparative life-history parameters of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs. Nature 430:772–775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erickson, G. M., Currie, P. J., Inouye, B. D., and Winn, A. A. 2006. Tyrannosaur life tables: an example of nonavian dinosaur population biology. Science 313:213–217.Google Scholar
Erickson, G. M., Makovicky, P. J., Inouye, B. D., Zhou, Chang-Fu, and Gao, Ke-Qin 2009. A life table for Psittacosaurus lujiatunensis: initial insights into ornithischian dinosaur population biology. The Anatomical Record 292:1514–1521.Google Scholar
Hall, P., and Van Keilegom, I. 2005. Testing for monotone increasing hazard rate. Annals of Statistics 33:1109–1137.Google Scholar
Hulbert, R. C. 1982. Dynamics of the three-toed horse Neohipparion from the late Miocene of Florida. Paleobiology 8:159–167.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, J. G., Chen, M.-H., and Sinha, D. 2001. Bayesian survival analysis. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Kohler, I. V., Preston, S. H., and Lackey, L. B. 2006. Comparative mortality levels among selected species of captive animals. Demographic Research 15:413–434.Google Scholar
Konigsberg, L. W., and Frankenberg, S. R. 2002. Deconstructing death in paleodemography. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 117:297–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurtén, B. 1983. Variation and dynamics of a fossil antelope population. Paleobiology 9:62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, Q., Liu, J., Varricchio, D. J., Huang, T., and Gao, C. 2004. Parental care in an ornithischian dinosaur. Nature 431:145–146.Google Scholar
Mihlbachler, M. C. 2003. Demography of late Miocene rhinoceroses (Teleoceras proterum and Aphelops malacorhinus) from Florida: linking mortality and sociality in fossil assemblages. Paleobiology 29:412–428.Google Scholar
Moore, J. R., and Norman, D. B. 2009. Quantitatively evaluating the sources of taphonomic biasing of skeletal element abundances in fossil assemblages. Palaios 24:591–602.Google Scholar
Mueller, L. D., Nusbaum, T. J., and Rose, M. R. 1995. The Gompertz equation as a predictive tool in demography. Experimental Gerontology 30:553–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, H.-G., Love, B., and Hoppa, R. D. 2001. Semiparametric method for estimating paleodemographic profiles from age indicator data. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 117:1–14.Google Scholar
Overton, W. S., and Stehman, S. V. 1995. The Horvitz-Thompson theorem as a unifying perspective for probability sampling: with examples from natural resource sampling. The American Statistician 49:261–268.Google Scholar
Pearl, R., and Miner, J. R. 1935. Experimental studies on the duration of life. XIV. The comparative mortality of certain lower organisms. Quarterly Review of Biology 10:60–79.Google Scholar
Promislow, D. E. L., Tatar, M., Pletcher, S., and Carey, J. R. 1999. Below-threshold mortality: implications for studies in evolution, ecology and demography. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12:314–28.Google Scholar
Rice, J. 1995. Mathematical statistics and data analysis, 2d ed. Duxbury, Belmont, Calif. Google Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. 2007. Tyrannosaur ageing. Biology Letters 3:214–217.Google Scholar
Roff, D. A. 2002. Life history evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. Google Scholar
Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B., and Wretman, J. 2003. Model assisted survey sampling. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Shouman, R., and Witten, M. 1995. Survival estimates and sample size: what can we conclude? Journal of Gerontology A 50:B177–B185.Google Scholar
Tullberg, B. S., Ah-King, M., and Temrin, H. 2002. Phylogenetic reconstruction of parental-care systems in the ancestors of birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 357:251–257.Google Scholar
Varricchio, D. J., and Jackson, F. D. 2003. Origins of avian reproduction: answers and questions from dinosaurs. Palaeovertebrata 32:149–170.Google Scholar
Wesolowski, T. 1994. On the origin of parental care and the early evolution of male and female parental roles in birds. American Naturalist 143:39–58.Google Scholar
Wesolowski, T. 2004. The origin of parental care in birds: a reassessment. Behavioral Ecology 15:520–523.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. B. 1927. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 22:209–212.Google Scholar
Yen, K., Steinsaltz, D., and Mobbs, C. V. 2008. Validated analysis of mortality rates demonstrates distinct genetic mechanisms that influence lifespan. Experimental Gerontology 43:1044–1051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed