Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:05:47.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Socio-economic and lifestyle determinants of giving practical support to adult children in the era of changing late life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2018

ANU SIREN  and
FREYA CASIER
ANU SIREN*
Affiliation:
The Danish Centre for Social Science Research VIVE, Copenhagen, Denmark.
FREYA CASIER
Affiliation:
The Danish Centre for Social Science Research VIVE, Copenhagen, Denmark.
*
Address for correspondence: Anu Siren, The Danish Centre for Social Science Research VIVE, DK-1052 Copenhagen, Denmark E-mail: anu@vive.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While research evidence indicates that older adults provide substantial amounts of financial, emotional and practical support to their adult children, little is known about the lifestyle-related drivers of providing such support or how these may be associated with changing late life in late modernity. Emerging popular discourses increasingly portray older adults as a group adopting new lifestyles, pursuing their own interests and rejecting normative family obligations. Using data from the Danish Longitudinal Study of Ageing, we examine first, cohort, age and period trends in the provision of informal support in 1997–2012 in Denmark; and second, the socio-economic and lifestyle factors associated with the likelihood of providing help to adult children. We find notably that, overall, older adults’ provision of informal support to their adult children has increased over time and that active lifestyles do not decrease the provision of support to adult children. However, in later mid-life (52–62 years), having full-time employment and high work-related stress decreases the likelihood of providing help. The results indicate that while older adults play an important role in providing support, external stressors such as work–life imbalance in later life may interfere with their engagement in intergenerational relationships.

Keywords

intergenerational relationshipsinformal care-givingfamily issues
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 39 , Issue 9 , September 2019 , pp. 1933 - 1950
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albertini, M., Kohli, M. and Vogel, C. 2007. Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns – different regimes? Journal of European Social Policy, 17, 4, 319–34.Google Scholar
Attias-Donfut, C. and Arber, S. 2000. Equity and solidarity across the generations. In Arber, S. and Attias-Donfut, C. (eds), The Myth of Generational Conflict. Routledge, London, 1–21.Google Scholar
Bengtson, V. L. and Roberts, R. E. L. 1991. Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: an example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 4, 856–70.Google Scholar
Binstock, R. H. 2010. From compassionate ageism to intergenerational conflict?. The Gerontologist, 50, 5, 574–85.Google Scholar
Bordone, V., Arpino, B. and Aassve, A. 2017. Patterns of grandparental child care across Europe: the role of the policy context and working mothers’ need. Ageing & Society, 37, 4, 845–73.Google Scholar
Brandt, M. and Deindl, C. 2013. Intergenerational transfers to adult children in Europe: do social policies matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 1, 235–51.Google Scholar
Brandt, M., Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. 2009. Intergenerational help and care in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25, 5, 585–601.Google Scholar
Bucx, F., van Wel, F. and Knijn, T. 2012. Life course status and exchanges of support between young adults and parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 1, 101–15.Google Scholar
Chambers, D. 2012. A Sociology of Family Life. Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Daatland, S. O. and Lowenstein, A. 2005. Intergenerational solidarity and the family–welfare state balance. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 3, 174–82.Google Scholar
Deindl, C. and Brandt, M. 2011. Financial support and practical help between older parents and their middle-aged children in Europe. Ageing & Society, 31, 4, 645–62.Google Scholar
Fingerman, K., Miller, L., Birditt, K. and Zarit, S. 2009. Giving to the good and the needy: parental support of grown children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 5, 1220–33.Google Scholar
Geurts, T., Van Tilburg, T., Poortman, A.-R. and Dykstra, P. A. 2015. Child care by grandparents: changes between 1992 and 2006. Ageing & Society, 35, 6, 1318–34.Google Scholar
Goodman, C. C. and Silverstein, M. 2001. Grandmothers who parent their grandchildren: an exploratory study of close relations across three generations. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 5, 557–78.Google Scholar
Healy, J. 2004. The Benefits of an Ageing Population. Discussion Paper 63, The Australia Institute. Available online at http://www.tai.org.au/documents/dp_fulltext/DP63.pdf [Accessed 24 April 2017].Google Scholar
Henretta, J. C., Grundy, E. and Harris, S. 2002. The influence of socio-economic and health differences on parents’ provision of help to adult children: a British–United States comparison. Ageing & Society, 22, 4, 441–58.Google Scholar
Higgs, P. and Gilleard, C. 2007. The Third Age and the Baby Boomers. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 2, 2, 13–30.Google Scholar
Hood, A. and Joyce, R. 2013. The Economic Circumstances of Cohorts Born Between the 1940s and the 1970s. Institute for Fiscal Studies. Available online at http://www.ifs.org.uk/comms/r89.pdf [Accessed 24 April 2017].Google Scholar
Karisto, A. 2007. Finnish baby boomers and the emergence of the third age. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 2, 2, 91–108.Google Scholar
Karisto, A. and Haapola, I. 2015. Generations in ageing Finland. In Komp, K. and Johansson, S. (eds), Population Ageing from a Lifecourse Perspective: Critical and International Approaches. Policy Press, Bristol, UK, 45–64.Google Scholar
Katz, S. 2000. Busy bodies: activity, aging, and the management of everyday life. Journal of Aging Studies, 14, 2, 135–52.Google Scholar
Kemp, C. L. 2007. Grandparent–grandchild ties. Reflections on continuity and change across three generations. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 7, 855–81.Google Scholar
Kincade, J. E., Rabiner, D. J., Bernard, S. L., Woomert, A., Konrad, T. R., DeFriese, G. H. and Ory, M. G. 1996. Older adults as a community resource: results from the national survey of self-care and aging. The Gerontologist, 36, 4, 474–82.Google Scholar
Kjær, A. A., Poulsen, M. H. and Siren, A. 2016. Respons og bortfald i ældredatabasen [Response Rates and Attrition in Danish Longitudinal Study of Ageing]. Danish National Centre for Social Research. Available online at https://pure.sfi.dk/ws/files/616781/Notat_Respons_og_bortfald_i_ldredatabasen.pdf. [Accessed 24 April 2017].Google Scholar
Kohli, M. 2004. Intergenerational transfers and inheritance: a comparative view. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 24, 1, 266–89.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. 1989. A Fresh Map of Life: The Emergence of the Third Age. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Sherlock, P. 2002. Social policy and population ageing: challenges for north and south. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 4, 754–7.Google Scholar
McLaren, L. 2014. Boomers redefining grandparenting role in hectic society. The Globe and Mail. Available online at http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/relationships/boomers-redefining-grandparenting-role-in-hectic-society/article18371614/ [Accessed 24 April 2017].Google Scholar
Minkler, M. 1999. Intergenerational households headed by grandparents: contexts, realities, and implications for policy. Journal of Aging Studies, 13, 2, 199–218.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2017. Average Effective Age of Retirement in 1970–2014 in OECD Countries (Time Series). Available online at http://www.oecd.org/els/public-pensions/ageingandemploymentpolicies-statisticsonaverageeffectiveageofretirement.htm [Accessed 1 December 2017].Google Scholar
Phillipson, C. 2015. The political economy of longevity: developing new forms of solidarity for later life. Sociological Quarterly, 56, 1, 80–100.Google Scholar
Proulx, C. and Le Bourdais, C. 2014. Impact of providing care on the risk of leaving employment in Canada. Canadian Journal on Aging, 33, 4, 488–503.Google Scholar
Ranzijn, R., Harford, J. and Andrews, G. 2002. Ageing and the economy: costs and benefits. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 21, 3, 145–51.Google Scholar
Statistics Denmark 2016. Statbank Denmark, National Census Data. Available online at http://www.statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/default.asp?w=1536 [Accessed 1 December 2017].Google Scholar
Szydlik, M. 2012. Generations: connections across the life course. Advances in Life Course Research, 17, 3, 100–11.Google Scholar
Thygesen, L. C., Daasnes, C., Thaulow, I. and Bronnum-Hansen, H. 2011. Introduction to Danish (nationwide) registers on health and social issues: structure, access, legislation, and archiving. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39, 7, 12–16.Google Scholar
Whittington, F. J. 2008. Book reviews. The Gerontologist, 48, 96, 839–44.Google Scholar