Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:26:39.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of tailored digital health interventions for mental health at the workplace: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

C. M. van der Feltz-Cornelis*
Affiliation:
Health Sciences HYMS, University of York, York, United Kingdom
T. M. Byrne
Affiliation:
Health Sciences
J. Shepherd
Affiliation:
Health Sciences
D. Merecz-Kot
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
M. Sinokki
Affiliation:
Turku Centre for Occupational Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
P. Naumanen
Affiliation:
Turku Centre for Occupational Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
L. Hakkaart-van Roijen
Affiliation:
Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
C. Empower
Affiliation:
Health Sciences
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Mental health problems in the workplace are common and have a considerable impact on employee wellbeing and productivity. Mental ill-health costs employers between £33 billion and £42 billion a year. According to a 2020 HSE report, roughly 2,440 per 100,000 workers in the UK were affected by work-related stress, depression, or anxiety, resulting in an estimated 17.9 million working days lost.

This study is part of the EMPOWER study. The European Intervention to Promote Wellbeing and Health in the Workplace (EMPOWER) consortium’s aim is to create an individualised digital tool that promotes employee wellbeing, mental health, and work productivity. It has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/home) and innovation program under grant agreement No 848180.

Objectives

We performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effect of tailored digital health interventions provided in the workplace aiming to improve mental health, presenteeism and absenteeism of employees.

Methods

We searched several databases for RCTs published from 2000 onwards. Data were extracted into a standardised data extraction form. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Due to the heterogeneity of outcome measures, narrative synthesis was used to summarise the findings.

Results

Seven RCTs (eight publications) were included that evaluated tailored digital interventions versus waiting list control or usual care to improve physical and mental health outcomes and work productivity.

The results are promising to the advantage of tailored digital interventions regarding presenteeism, sleep, stress levels, and physical symptoms related to somatisation.

There is less evidence for addressing depression, anxiety, and absenteeism in the general working population, but they significantly reduced depression and anxiety in employees with higher levels of psychological distress.

Conclusions

Tailored digital interventions seem more effective in employees with higher levels of distress, presenteeism or absenteeism than in the general working population. However, so far, there are not many studies in this domain. Given the promising results, tailoring of digital interventions based upon employee input should be a focus in future research.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.