3 results
Hierarchies in biology and paleontology
- James W. Valentine, Cathleen L. May
-
- Journal:
- Paleobiology / Volume 22 / Issue 1 / Winter 1996
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 08 April 2016, pp. 23-33
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Hierarchies in natural science are ranked and nested structures such that units at each rank include parts that are units at lower ranks. Hierarchies are able to render complexity tractable, by homogenizing units into collectives and by ordering collectives in ranks of increasing inclusiveness. Hierarchies contrast with positional structures, such as phylogenetic trees, for in trees all positions are occupied by the same sort of entity—there are no ranked collectives—and positions are specified by the order of appearance or precedence of the entities. In hierarchies, interactions within ranks are most important; in trees, sequences of events along branches are of primary concern. As a result hierarchies do, and trees do not, display emergent properties.
The value of the hierarchical structure can be lost when ranks are misspecified. A common error is the use of only a fraction of entities that actually occur in a rank, as when genes are considered as a rank below cells, disregarding the remaining cell contents and rendering the nature of cellular organization moot. Misspecification is also common when attributes or processes are used in ranks without indications of the physical entities to which they refer, thus losing track of the proper composition and ranking of the collectives.
Paleoenvironment and taphonomy of the dinosaur-bearing Ischigualasto Formation (Upper Triassic, Argentina)
- Raymond R. Rogers, Catherine A. Forster, Cathleen L. May, Alfredo Monetta, Paul C. Sereno
-
- Journal:
- The Paleontological Society Special Publications / Volume 6 / 1992
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 26 July 2017, p. 249
- Print publication:
- 1992
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
The oldest-known dinosaurs (Herrerasaurus, Pisanosaurus) occur within the Ischigualasto Formation. Recent work in the formation has brought to light significant new material, including the complete skeleton of a new primitive dinosaur. We sketch below the paleoenvironment and faunal succession during the range of these early dinosaurs, and review some of the taphonomic factors that shaped their fossil record.
The Ischigualasto Formation (Carnian?) is included within the Agua de la Peña Group, a series of continental Triassic deposits exposed in the Ischigualasto-Ville Union Basin of northwest Argentina. Ischigualasto sediments rest unconformably upon the carbonaceous fluvial/lacustrine Los Rastros Formation; this contact is characterized locally by marked angular discordance. The upper contact is gradational into red-beds of the Los Colorados Formation. Medium- to coarse-grained conglomeratic sandstones, siltstones, and silty mudstones dominate the section. Sand bodies are characterized by medium- to large-scale trough cross-stratification and broad lenticular/narrow sheet geometries, and are interpreted as deposits of shallow, low-sinuosity streams. Siltstones and mudstones show pervasive evidence of soil development, including root traces, nodular caliche horizons, and pedogenic slickensides. Deposits attributable to lacustrine/paludal sedimentation are scarce, and freshwater vertebrates and invertebrates are extremely rare. These data suggest an upland depositional setting on a low-relief alluvial plain with seasonal climate.
The Ischigualasto vertebrate fauna includes archosaurs, rhynchosaurs, traversodontid and carnivorous cynodonts, and temnospondyl amphibians. Rhynchosaurs dominate (relative specimen abundance) in the lower half of the section, but are absent from the upper half. Traversodontid cynodonts occur throughout the formation, but are much more abundant up-section. Archosaurs, carnivorous cynodonts, and particularly temnospondyls are rare throughout, with dinosaurs limited to the lower half. No major stratigraphic or sedimentologic changes occur up-section, and there is no evidence for significant shifts in physical or chemical taphonomic processes. Thus, trends in relative taxon abundance likely record a true biotic signal (e.g., local extinction, immigration) rather than a taphonomically-driven preservational bias.
Fossils are preserved as isolated carcasses or disarticulated elements, most often in fine-grained overbank facies. Bone beds and microsites are conspicuously absent. Temnospondyl remains were found within a local carbonaceous lens developed upon a sand body, suggesting autochthonous burial in an abandoned-channel setting. Isolated skulls, particularly those of the traversodontid Exaeretodon, are extremely common. Fifteen isolated crania of this cynodont were mapped in a single stratum with limited areal exposure. Abundant preservation of isolated therapsid crania has also been reported in the Beaufort Series (Permo-Triassic) of the Karoo Basin, South Africa (Smith, 1980). Post-disarticulation hydrodynamic sorting (enhanced by scavenging?) of an areally dispersed mass-mortality assemblage may explain this unusual occurrence.
Two new carnivorous cynodonts from the Ischigualasto Formation (Upper Triassic) of Argentina
- Ricardo N. Martínez, Catherine A. Forster, Cathleen L. May
-
- Journal:
- The Paleontological Society Special Publications / Volume 6 / 1992
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 26 July 2017, p. 202
- Print publication:
- 1992
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Two skulls representing new forms of carnivorous cynodonts were discovered recently in the Upper Triassic (Carnian) Ischigualasto Formation of northwestern Argentina. These specimens are the first complete carnivorous cynodonts described from the Late Triassic of Argentina, and provide critical evidence for the evolution of cranial form between well known Middle Triassic cynodonts, such as Probainognathus, and the first mammals in the latest Triassic.
The first skull (PVSJ 422) is proportionately long, with a posterior skull width only 35 per cent of basal skull length (9.5 cm.). Other distinctive features of the skull include the form of the postcanine crowns, which have two cusps posterior to the principal cusp and fine serations on their leading edges, and which overlap each other in an imbricate pattern. Postcanines 5-7 are subequal in size, overlap the dentary laterally, and are substantially larger than postcanines 2-4. The dental formula in the upper jaw is I4-C1-PC7, with the small first postcanine separated fore and aft by small diastemas. As in other advanced eucynodonts, no pineal foramen is present. Some postcranial elements, as yet unstudied, were also found with this specimen.
The second skull (PVSJ 411) has broader proportions, the width between quadrates almost half that of basal skull length (7.5 cm.). These proportions, in combination with deep, curved zygomatic arches, resemble other Middle Triassic cynodonts such as Probelesodon. Distinctive features of this skull include bicusped postcanines in the upper jaw similar to those of Probelesodon, and a mandibular symphysis that extends back to the level of the fourth postcanine. The dental formula in the upper jaw is I4-C1-PC6. As in the first skull, a pineal foramen is absent.
Several advanced cranial features, such as a fused mandibular symphysis, occur in both skulls and strongly suggest that these new forms belong within the Eucynodontia (Hopson, 1991). Other advanced features, such as the absence of a pineal foramen, further suggest that these new forms are closer to mammals than are traversodontid cynodonts. In contrast, other characters appear to be curiosly primitive, such as a short hard palate in the first skull. These new cynodonts thus may introduce previously unseen features and character combinations to the study of cynodont cranial evolution.