We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The construction of the provisional equidistance line – the first stage of the three-stage maritime delimitation procedure espoused in the decisions of international courts and tribunals – is examined by contrasting the ideal of an objective, geometry-based provisional line with the actual practices of simultaneity and preemptive modification of baselines. Examples are presented from the case law of the International Court of Justice and other international courts and tribunals with respect to the selection of appropriate basepoints from which to construct the provisional line, a practice which introduces relevant circumstances and a significant level of subjectivity to the first-stage of the delimitation process. This practice has the potential to undermine the legitimacy of maritime boundary decisions.