Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home
Maritime Boundary Delimitation: The Case Law

Book description

The law of maritime delimitation has been mostly developed through the case law of the International Court of Justice and other tribunals. In the past decade there have been a number of cases that raise questions about the consistency and predictability of the jurisprudence concerning this sub-field of international law. This book investigates these questions through a systematical review of the case law on the delimitation of the continental shelf and the exclusive economic zone. Comprehensive coverage allows for conclusions to be drawn about the case law's approach to the applicable law and its application to the individual case. Maritime Boundary Delimitation: The Case Law will appeal to scholars of international dispute settlement as well as practitioners and academics interested in the law concerning the delimitation of maritime boundaries.

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
Adede, A. O., ‘Toward the Formulation of the Rule of Delimitation of Sea Boundaries between States with Adjacent or Opposite Coasts,’ (1979) 19 Virginia Journal of International Law 207.
Anderson, D., ‘Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary (Bangladesh v. India),’ (2015) 105 American Journal of International Law 146.
Anderson, D., ‘Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea Case (Romania v. Ukraine),’ (2009) 8 Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 305.
Anderson, D., ‘The Principle of Reasonableness in the Law of the Sea,’ in Hestermeyer, H. P., Köning, D., Matz-Lück, N., Röben, V., Seibert-Fohr, A., Stoll, P.-T., and Vöneky, S. (eds.), Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity, Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum (Martinus Nijhoff Leiden 2012) 667.
Anderson, D., ‘Recent Judicial Decisions Concerning Maritime Delimitation,’ in del Castillo, L. (ed.), Law of the Sea, from Grotius to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Brill/Nijhoff Leiden 2015) 500.
Antunes, N. M., Towards the Conceptualisation of Maritime Delimitation (Martinus Nijhoff Leiden 2003).
Árnadóttir, S., ‘Termination of Maritime Boundaries due to a Fundamental Change of Circumstances,’ (2016) 32 Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 83.
Attard, D. J., The Exclusive Economic Zone in International Law (Oxford University Press Oxford 1987).
Bankes, N., ‘The Relationship between Declarations under the Optional Clause of the Statute of the International Court of Justice and Part XV of the Law of the Sea Convention’ (K. G. Jebsen Centre for the Law of the Sea blog, available at http://site.uit.no/jclos/files/2017/02/The-relationship-between-declarations-under-the-optional-clause-of-the-Statute-of-the-International-Court-of-Justice-and-Part-XV-of-the-Law-of-the-Sea-Convention.pdf).
Bardonnet, D., ‘Equité et frontières terrestres,’ in Mélanges offerts à Paul Reuter. Le droit international: unité et diversité (Pedone Paris 1981).
Becker-Weinberg, V., Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Deposits in the Law of the Sea (Springer Hamburg 2014).
Bianchi, A., and Peters, A. (eds.), Transparency in International Law (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2013).
Bonafe, B., ‘Interests of a Legal Nature Justifying Intervention before the ICJ,’ (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 3, 739.
Bowett, D. W., The Legal Regime of Islands in International Law (Oceana Publications New York 1979).
Brower, C. H., ‘Arbitration,’ in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (online ed.; last updated February 2007).
Brown, C., ‘Article 59,’ in Zimmerman, A. et al. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford University Press Oxford 2012) 1434.
Brown, E. D., Legal Regime of Hydrospace (Stevens and Sons London 1971).
Brown, E. D., Sea-bed Energy and Minerals: The International Legal Regime (Martinus Nijhoff Leiden 1992).
Brown, E. D., ‘The Tunisia-Libya Continental Shelf Case: A Missed Opportunity,’ (July 1983) Marine Policy 142.
Buga, I., ‘Territorial Sovereignty Issues in Maritime Disputes: A Jurisdictional Dilemma for Law of the Sea Tribunals,’ (2012) 59 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 27.
Busch, S. V., Establishing Continental Shelf Limits beyond 200 Nautical Miles by the Coastal State: A Right of Involvement for Other States? (Brill Nijhoff Leiden 2016).
Cazala, J., ‘Retour sur les méthodes de délimitation juridictionnelle d'espaces maritimes mises en œuvre dans quelques affaires récentes,’ (2008) 54 Annuaire français de droit international 411.
Charney, J. I., ‘Ocean Boundaries between Nations: A Theory for Progress,’ (1984) 78 American Journal of International Law 582.
Charney, J. I., ‘Progress in International Maritime Delimitation Law,’ (1994) 88 American Journal of International Law 227.
Churchill, R. R., ‘The Bangladesh/Myanmar Case: Continuity and Novelty in the Law of Maritime Boundary Delimitation,’ (2012) 1 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 137.
Churchill, R. R., ‘Dispute Settlement in the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2014,’ (2015) 13 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 585.
Churchill, R. R., and Lowe, A. V., The Law of the Sea, 3rd ed. (Manchester University Press Manchester 1999).
Colson, D., ‘The Delimitation of the Outer Continental Shelf between Neighboring States,’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law 91.
Cooper, J., ‘Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area,’ (1986) 16 Ocean Development and International Law 59.
Corten, O., L'utilisation du ‘raisonnable’ par le juge international: discours juridique, raison et contradictions (Bruylant Bruxelles 1997).
Cottier, T., Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation: The Quest for Distributive Justice in International Law (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2015).
Crawford, J. (ed.), Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law, 8th ed. (Oxford University Press Oxford 2012).
Currie, J., ‘Maritime Boundary Delimitation in a Federal Domestic Setting: The Newfoundland and Labrador v. Nova Scotia Arbitration,’ (2004) 17 Leiden Journal of International Law 155.
Daillier, P., Forteau, M., and Pellet, A., Droit international public (LGDJ Paris 2009).
Davenport, T., ‘ASEAN Approaches to Maritime Boundary Disputes: Wider Implications for ASEAN,’ (2013) 107 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law 281.
Degan, V., ‘Consolidation of Legal Principles on Maritime Delimitation: Implications for the Dispute between Slovenia and Croatia in the North Adriatic,’ 6 (2007) Chinese Journal of International Law 601.
Delabie, L., ‘Le fragile équilibre entre prévisibilité juridique et opportunité judiciaire en matière de délimitation maritime: l'arrêt de la Cour internationale de Justice du 19 novembre 2012 dans l'affaire du différend territorial et maritime (Nicaragua c. Colombie),’ (2012) Annuaire français de droit international 223.
del Castillo, L. (ed.), Law of the Sea, from Grotius to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Liber Amicorum Judge Hugo Caminos (Brill/Nijhoff Leiden 2015) 58.
Eiriksson, G., ‘The Bay of Bengal Case before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,’ in del Castillo, L. (ed.), Law of the Sea, from Grotius to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Liber Amicorum Judge Hugo Caminos (Brill/Nijhoff Leiden 2015) 514.
Evans, M. D., ‘Delimitation and the Common Maritime Boundary,’ (1993) 64 British Yearbook of International Law 283.
Evans, M. D., ‘Maritime Boundary Delimitation,’ in Rothwell, D. R., Oude Elferink, A. G., Scott, K. N., and Stephens, T. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (Oxford University Press Oxford 2015) 255.
Evans, M. D., ‘Maritime Boundary Delimitation: Whatever Next?,’ in Barrett, J. and Barnes, R. (eds.), Law of the Sea; UNCLOS as a Living Treaty (British Institute of International and Comparative Law London 2016) 41.
Evans, M. D., ‘Maritime Boundary Delimitation: Where Do We Go from Here?,’ in Freestone, D., Barnes, R., and Ong, D. (eds.), The Law of the Sea: Progress and Prospects (Oxford University Press Oxford 2006) 155.
Evans, M. D., ‘Maritime Delimitation and Expanding Categories of Relevant Circumstances,’ (1990) 40 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1.
Evans, M. D., Relevant Circumstances and Maritime Delimitation (Oxford University Press Oxford 1989).
Fietta, S., ‘International Court of Justice Judgment on Sovereignty over Disputed Islands, and Delimitation of the Territorial Sea, Exclusive Economic Zone, and Continental Shelf Guyana/Suriname’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 119.
Fietta, S., and Cleverly, R., A Practitioner's Guide to Maritime Boundary Delimitation (Oxford University Press Oxford 2016).
Forlati, S., The International Court of Justice, an Arbitral Tribunal or a Judicial Body (Springer Switzerland 2014).
Franck, T. M., Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Clarendon Press Oxford 1995).
Friedmann, W., ‘The North Sea Continental Shelf Cases – A Critique’ (1970) 64 American Journal of International Law 229.
Gao, J., ‘Comments on Guyana v. Suriname,’ (2009) 8 Chinese Journal of International Law 191.
Giraudeau, G., ‘La remarquable entrée en scène du TIDM dans le contentieux de la délimitation maritime: l'arrêt du 14 mars 2012 relatif au différend entre le Bangladesh et le Myanmar dans le Golfe du Bengale,’ (2012) 17 Annuaire du droit de la mer 105.
Guillaume, G., Speech by His Excellency Judge Gilbert Guillaume, President of the International Court of Justice, to the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly of the United Nations, 31 October 2001.
Gutteridge, J. A. C., ‘The 1958 Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf,’ (1959) 53 British Yearbook of International Law 102.
Higgins, R., Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Clarendon Press Oxford 1994).
Ibler, V., ‘Jus cogens and the Law of the Sea,’ in Cohen, M. G. (ed.), Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution through International Law: Liber Amicorum Lucius Caflisch (Brill Leiden 2007).
Ida, R., ‘The Role of Proportionality in Maritime Delimitation Revisited: The Origin and Meaning of the Principle from the Early Decisions of the Court,’ in Ando, N. et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (Kluwer The Hague 2002) 1037.
Jagota, S. P., Maritime Boundary (Nijhoff Dordrecht 1985).
Jensen, Ø., ‘The Barents Sea: Treaty between Norway and the Russian Federation Concerning Maritime Delimitation and Cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean,’ (2011) 26 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 151.
Jensen, Ø., ‘Maritime Boundary Delimitation beyond 200 Nautical Miles: The International Judiciary and the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf,’ (2015) 84 Nordic Journal of International Law 580.
Jiménez de Aréchaga, E., ‘The Conception of Equity in Maritime Delimitation,’ in Zanardi, P. L. et al. (eds.), Le droit international à l'heure de sa codification. Etudes en l'honneur de Roberto Ago (Milan 1987) t. II, 229.
Johnston, D. M., The Theory and History of Ocean Boundary-Making (McGill-Queen's University Press Kingston-Montreal 1988).
Jouannet, E., ‘L'impossible protection des droits du tiers par la Cour internationale de Justice dans les affaires de délimitation maritime,’ in La mer et son droit, Mélanges offerts à L. Luchini et J. P Quéneudec (Éditions A. Pedone Paris 2003) 315.
Klein, N., ‘Provisional Measures and Provisional Arrangements in Maritime Boundary Disputes,’ (2006) 21 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 423.
Kolb, R., Case Law on Equitable Maritime Delimitation: Digest and Commentaries [Jurisprudence sur les deélimitations maritimes selon l'équite: répertoire et commentaires] (Nijhoff Leiden 2003).
Kunoy, B., ‘The Admissibility of a Plea to an International Adjudicative Forum to Delimit the Outer Continental Shelf Prior to the Adoption of Final Recommendations by the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf,’ (2010) 25 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 237.
Kwiatkowska, B., ‘Submissions to the UN CLCS in Cases of Disputed and Undisputed Maritime Boundary Delimitations or Other Unresolved Land or Maritime Disputes of Developing States,’ Farewell Lecture of Prof. B Kwiatkowska, 9 December 2011, http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/23543019.
Lagoni, R., ‘Interim Measures Pending Maritime Delimitation Agreements,’ (1984) 78 American Journal of International Law 345.
Lando, M., ‘Judicial Uncertainties Concerning Territorial Sea Delimitation under Article 15 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,’ (2017) 66 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 589.
Lathrop, C. (ed.), International Maritime Boundaries, online ed. (Martinus Nijhoff Dordrecht 2015).
Legault, H., and Hankey, B., ‘Method, Oppositeness and Adjacency, and Proportionality in Maritime Boundary Delimitation,’ in Charney, J. I. and Alexander, L. M. (eds.), International Maritime Boundaries, vol. 1 (Martinus Nijhoff Dordrecht 1991) 203.
Lowe, V., International Law: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press Oxford 2015).
Lucchini, L., ‘La delimitation des frontiers maritimes dans la jurisprudence international: vue d'ensemble,’ in Lagoni, R. and Vignes, D. (eds.), Maritime Delimitation (Martinus Nijhoff Leiden 2006) 1.
Lucchini, L., and Vœlckel, M., Droit de la mer tome II, Delimitation (Pedone Paris 1996).
Magnusson, B. M., The Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles – Delineation, Delimitation and Dispute Settlement (Brill/Nijhoff Leiden 2015).
Magnusson, B. M., ‘Judgment in the Dispute Concerning the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal,’ (2012) 27 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 623.
McDougal, M. S., and Burke, T., The Public Order of the Oceans (Yale University Press New Haven 1987).
Merrills, J. G., International Dispute Settlement, 5th ed. (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2011).
Miyoshi, M., ‘Considerations on Equity in Maritime Boundary Cases before the International Court of Justice,’ in Ando, N., McWhinney, E., Wolfrum, R., and Röben, B. Baker (eds.), Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (Brill/Nijhoff Leiden 2002).
Ndiaye, T. M., ‘The Judge, Maritime Delimitation and the Grey Areas,’ (2015) 55 Indian Journal of International Law 493.
Nelson, L. D. M., ‘The Roles of Equity in the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries,’ (1990) 86 American Journal of International Law 837.
Newton, M., and May, L., Proportionality in International Law (Oxford University Press Oxford 2014).
Olorundami, F., ‘The ICJ and Its Lip Service to the Non-Priority Status of the Equidistance Method of Delimitation,’ (2015) 4(1) Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 53.
Olorundami, F., ‘Objectivity versus Subjectivity in the Context of the ICJ's Three-Stage Methodology of Maritime Boundary Delimitation,’ (2017) 32(1) The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 36.
Ong, D. M., ‘Joint Development of Common Offshore Oil and Gas Deposits: “Mere” State Practice or Customary International Law?,’ (1999) 93 American Journal of International Law 771.
Orrego Vicuña, F., ‘Le pied du chancelier continue de s'allonger: les principes généraux et l’équité en droit international: à la recherche de limites à la flexibilité du droit,’ in Kohen, M., Kolb, R., and Tehindrazanarivelo, D. Liva (eds.), Perspectives of International Law in the 21st Century: Liber Amicorum Professor Christian Dominicé in Honour of His 80th Birthday (Martinus Nijhoff Leiden 2012) 81.
Oude Elferink, A. G., ‘Article 76 of the LOSC on the Definition of the Continental Shelf: Questions Concerning Its Interpretation from a Legal Perspective,’ (2006) 21 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 269.
Oude Elferink, A. G., The Delimitation of the Continental Shelf between Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands; Arguing Law, Practicing Politics? (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2013).
Oude Elferink, A. G., ‘Does Undisputed Title to a Maritime Zone Always Exclude Its Delimitation? The Grey Area Issue,’ (1998) 13 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 143.
Oude Elferink, A. G., ‘The Impact of the Law of the Sea Convention on the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries,’ in Vidas, D. and Østreng, W. (eds.), Order for the Oceans at the Turn of the Century (Kluwer Law International The Hague 1999) 462.
Oude Elferink, A. G., ‘International Law and Negotiated and Adjudicated Maritime Boundaries: A Complex Relationship,’ (2015) 58 German Yearbook of International Law 231.
Oude Elferink, A. G., ‘ITLOS's Approach to the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles in the Bangladesh/Myanmar Case: Theoretical and Practical Difficulties,’ in Wolfrum, R., Seršić, M., and Šošić, T. (eds.), Contemporary Developments in International Law – Essays in Honour of Budislav Vukas (Brill/Nijhoff Leiden 2015) 230.
Oude Elferink, A. G., The Law of Maritime Boundary Delimitation: A Case Study of the Russian Federation (Martinus Nijhoff Dordrecht 1994).
Oude Elferink, A. G., ‘Slovenia/Croatia arbitration Is – the territorial sea delimitation inconsistent with the case law on maritime delimitation?’, JCLOS Blog of 16 August 2017, http://site.uit.no/jclos/2017/08/16/sloveniacroatia-arbitration-is-the-territorial-sea-delimitation-inconsistent-with-the-case-law-on-maritime-delimitation/.
Oxman, B. H., ‘International Maritime Boundaries: Political, Strategic, and Historical Considerations,’ (1994–1995) 26 University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 243.
Paik, J.-H., ‘The Role of Proportionality in Maritime Delimitation: State of Jurisprudence,’ in Hestermeyer, H. P. et al. (eds.), Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity, Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum, vol. 1 (Nijhoff Leiden 2012) 199.
Pellet, A., ‘Land and Maritime Tripoints in International Jurisprudence,’ in Hestermeyer, H. et al. (eds.), Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity: Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum (Martinus Nijhoff Leiden 2011) 245.
Prescott, V., and Schofield, C., The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World, 2nd ed. (Martinus Nijhoff Leiden 2005).
Punzhin, S. M., ‘Printsipy Razgranicheniia Morskikh Prostranstv,’ in Kolodkin, R. A. and Punzhin, S. M. (eds.), International Law of the Sea: Essays in Memory of A.L. Kolodkin (Statut Moscow 2014) 61.
Reichler, P., ‘A Case of Equitable Maritime Delimitation: Nicaragua and Colombia in the Western Caribbean Sea,’ (2013) 2(3) Revista Tribuna Internacional Volumen 129.
Reismann, M. W., ‘Eritrea–Yemen Arbitration (Award, Phase II: Maritime Delimitation),’ (2000) 94 American Journal of International Law 734.
Reuter, P., Le développement de l'ordre juridique international, écrits de droit international (Economica Paris 1995).
Rosenne, S., ‘The Case-Law of ITLOS (1997-2001): An Overview,’ in Nordquist, M. H. and Moore, J. Norton (eds.), Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Nijhoff The Hague 2001) 127.
Rosenne, S., Intervention in the International Court of Justice (Martinus Nijhoff Leiden 1993).
Rothwell, D., and Stephens, T., The International Law of the Sea (Hart Oxford 2009).
Ruiz-Fabri, H., ‘Sur la délimitation des espaces maritimes entre le Canada et la France, sentence arbitrale du 10 juin 1992,’ (1993) 97 Revue générale de droit international public 67.
Schachter, O., ‘Linking Equity and Law in Maritime Delimitation,’ in Ando, N., McWhinney, E., Wolfrum, R., and Röben, B. Baker (eds.), Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (Brill/Nijhoff Leiden 2002) 1163.
Schoolmeester, T., and Baker, E. (eds.), Continental Shelf; The Last Maritime Zone; Status in Sept. 2010 (UNEP/GRID-Arendal Arendal 2011) 16.
Scobbie, I., ‘Res Judicata, Precedent and the International Court: A Preliminary Sketch’ (1999) 20 Australian Year Book of International Law 299.
Scobbie, I., ‘Tom Franck's Fairness,’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 909.
Scovazzi, T., ‘Libya-Tunisia,’ in Charney, J. I. and Alexander, L. M. (eds.), International Maritime Boundaries, vol. 2 (Martinus Nijhoff Dordrecht 1993) 1663.
Shah Alam, M., and Al Faruque, A., ‘The Problem of Delimitation of Bangladesh's Maritime Boundaries with India and Myanmar: Prospects for a Solution,’ (2010) 25 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 405.
Shi, J., ‘Maritime Delimitation in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice,’ (2010) 9 Chinese Journal of International Law 271.
Smith, R. W. (ed.), Maritime Boundaries of the World, Limits in the Seas 108, 1st rev. (US Department of State Washington, DC 1990).
Sorel, J.-M., ‘Le juge international face à l’équité dans le règlement de différends territoriaux,’ in Weckel, P. (ed.), Le juge international et l'aménagement de l'espace: la spécificité du contentieux territorial (Pedone Paris 1998) 161.
Talmon, S., ‘The South China Sea Arbitration and the Finality of “Final” Awards,’ (2017) 1 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 388.
Tanaka, Y., Predictability and Flexibility in the Law of Maritime Delimitation (Hart Oxford 2006).
Tanaka, Y., ‘Reflections on Maritime Delimitation in the Cameroon/Nigeria Case,’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 369.
Tanaka, Y., ‘Reflections on Maritime Delimitation in the Romania/Ukraine Case before the ICJ,’ (2009) 56 Netherlands International Law Review 397.
Tanaka, Y., ‘Reflections on the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia before the International Court of Justice,’ (2013) 26 Leiden Journal of International Law 909.
Tanaka, Y., ‘Unilateral Exploration and Exploitation of Natural Resources in Disputed Areas: A Note on the Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire Order of 25 April 2015 before the Special Chamber of ITLOS,’ (2015) 46 Ocean Development and International Law 315.
Tanja, G. J., The Legal Determination of International Maritime Boundaries (Kluwer Law Deventer 1990).
Thirlway, H., The International Court of Justice (Oxford University Press Oxford 2016).
Thirlway, H., ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989: Part Thirteen,’ (2003) 74 British Yearbook of International Law 1, 52.
Thirlway, H., The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Fifty Years of Jurisprudence, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press Oxford 2013).
Vallat, F., ‘The Continental Shelf,’ (1946) 23 British Yearbook of International Law 333.
Van Logchem, Y., ‘The Scope for Unilateralism in Disputed Maritime Areas,’ in Schofield, C., Lee, S., and Kwon, M.-S. (eds.), The Limits of Maritime Jurisdiction (Martinus Nijhoff Leiden 2014) 186.
Vidas, D., ‘The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, the European Union and the Rule of Law: What Is Going on in the Adriatic Sea?,’ (2009) 24 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 1.
von Mühlendahl, P., ‘Tiny Land Features in Recent Maritime Delimitation Case Law,’ (2016) 31 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 1.
Wang, Z., ‘Disputes over Fishery Resources and Maritime Boundary Delimitation of the Diaoyu Islands: An Analysis,’ (2009) 1 China Oceans Law Review 310.
Watts, A., The International Law Commission 1948–1998, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press Oxford 1999).
Weil, P., ‘Délimitation maritime et délimitation terrestre,’ in Dinšṭein, Y. and Tabory, M. (eds.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Martinus Nijhoff Leiden 1989) 1023.
Weil, P., The Law of Maritime Delimitation: Reflections (Grotius Cambridge 1989).
Weil, P., ‘Le droit international en quête de son identité: cours général de droit international public,’ (1992) 2 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 245.
Weil, P., ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law,’ (1983) 77 American Journal of International Law 413.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed