5 results
3 The Menopause Transition in Women with Traumatic Brain Injury
- Lisa J. Rapport, Claire Z. Kalpakjian, Robin A Hanks, Elisabeth H. Quint
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 99-100
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
All premenopausal women who survive traumatic brain injury (TBI) will eventually experience menopause. Challenges experienced by women with TBI are superimposed on challenges associated with hormonal changes in midlife. Some women with stressful life contexts such as TBI are more vulnerable to the added burdens of the menopause transition, potentiating its effects. Although it may be argued that TBI research correctly overrepresents the male experience given disparities in injury rates (4:1), there are important differences in how females and males age, their specific health needs, and the psychosocial context of midlife. Development of evidence-based interventions begins with understanding the experience of menopause after TBI, including where and when key problems may emerge.
Participants and Methods:All participants were women 40-60 years old, not taking hormones (i.e., replacement therapy or other systematic hormones), with intact ovaries. Women with TBI were > 2 years post injury, whose menstrual period returned after injury, and were living in the community. Severity of injury ranged from complicated-mild to severe TBI. Pre/peri and postmenopausal status was determined by presence/absence of menstrual period in previous 6 months, respectively. Eighteen common menopause symptoms (vasomotor, somatic, psychological, and cognitive) were assessed for presence and frequency (rarely-always), along with Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Sleep Disturbance and Traumatic Brain Injury Quality of Life (TBIQOL) Anxiety, Depression, and Fatigue scales.
Results:Overall, women with TBI (n = 68) showed greater presence and frequency of symptoms than women without TBI (n = 153), with fewer within-group differences by menopausal status. Among pre/peri-menopausal women, TBI and non-TBI groups did not significantly differ and showed small effect sizes on symptoms associated with changes in estrogen during menopause, including hot flashes, night sweats, bowel and bladder sequelae, and breast tenderness. However, pre/peri-menopausal women with TBI also endorsed body aches and headaches, as well as troubles with memory, focus, fatigue, cognitive concerns, sleep, and anxiety significantly more than their pre/peri-menopausal counterparts (all medium effect sizes). Among postmenopausal women, those with TBI had significantly greater frequency of hot flashes, crying spells, poor memory, worry, moodiness, panic attacks, sleep disturbance, and anxiety than women without TBI. Within TBI, only hot flashes and breast tenderness were greater in postmenopausal versus pre/peri-menopausal women. Within non-TBI, postmenopausal status was associated with significantly greater hot flashes, night sweats, restlessness, poor memory, irritability, sleep disturbance, and anxiety, with greater fatigue but not significantly.
Conclusions:The findings support a model of TBI and menopause in which symptoms most closely associated with estrogen decline in pre/peri-menopause are generally similar between women with and without TBI, and symptoms that overlap with common TBI sequelae were generally more often present and frequently experienced among women with TBI versus non-TBI. We did not observe a synergistic or potentiating effect of TBI on menopause symptoms in post-menopause. These findings offer insight that contextualizes the experience of menopause symptoms among women with TBI. Such insights are essential for the development of treatment approaches that maximize health and wellbeing during the menopause transition for women with TBI.
89 Detecting Feigned Cognitive Impairment Using Pupillometry on the Warrington Recognition Memory Test for Words
- Sarah D Patrick, Lisa J Rapport, Robin A Hanks, Robert J Kanser
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 761-762
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Traditional methods of assessing performance validity have numerous weaknesses, among them, results can be consciously manipulated by examinees who wish to feign cognitive impairment. This study tested the ability of pupillary dilation patterns during a performance validity test (PVT) to enhance diagnostic accuracy in discriminating true from feigned impairment of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Pupillometry provides information about physiological and psychological processes related to cognitive load, familiarity, and deception and is outside of conscious control. Patrick, Rapport, Kanser, Hanks, and Bashem (2021) established proof of concept for the utility of pupillometry with PVTs applied to the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). This study replicated and extended this work by evaluating the incremental utility of pupillary-derived indices on the Warrington Recognition Memory Test for Words (RMT).
Participants and Methods:Participants included 214 adults in three groups: adults with bona fide TBI (TBI; n = 51) healthy comparisons instructed to perform their best (HC; n = 72), and healthy adults instructed and incentivized to simulate cognitive impairment due to TBI (SIM; n = 91). Moreover, this study examined pupillary pattern differences among successful (i.e., failed < 1 PVT and performed impaired on cognitive tests) and unsuccessful (i.e., failed > 2 PVTs or did not score impaired on a cognitive test) SIM, including SIM who did and did not fail the RMT. The RMT was administered in the context of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. Indices included two pure pupil dilation (PD) indices: a simple measure of baseline arousal (PD-Baseline) and a nuanced measure of dynamic engagement (PD-Range). A pupillo-behavioral index was also evaluated: Dilation-response inconsistency (DRI) captured the frequency with which examinees displayed a pupillary familiarity response to the correct answer but selected the unfamiliar stimulus (incorrect answer).
Results:The results generally replicated Patrick et al. (2021), as all three indices were useful in discriminating between groups and provided incremental utility to traditional accuracy scores. PD-Baseline appeared sensitive to oculomotor dysfunction due to TBI (i.e., increasing accurate identification of that group); adults with TBI displayed significantly lower chronic arousal as compared to the two groups of healthy adults (SIM, HC). In fact, the TBI group showed significantly lower PD-Baseline than both unsuccessful simulators who were detected as feigners and successful simulators who passed PVTs but effectively feigned TBI on other tests. Dynamic engagement (PD-Range) yielded a hierarchical structure such that SIM were more dynamically engaged than TBI followed by HC. As predicted, simulators engaged in DRI significantly more frequently than other groups. Moreover, DRI added unique information to RMT accuracy in classifying unsuccessful simulators from all other groups. Each of these three pupillary indices showed large effect sizes, and logistic regressions indicated that each contributed unique variance in predicting group membership on one or more of the paired contrasts (i.e., SIM-TBI, SIM-HC, HC-TBI).
Conclusions:Taken together, the findings support continued research on the application of pupillometry to performance validity assessment: Pupillometry provided unique information in enhancing classification accuracy beyond traditional PVT accuracy scores. Overall, the findings highlight the promise of biometric indices in multimethod assessments of performance validity.
38 Assessing Memory for Emotions Separately from Emotion Recognition
- Gavin Sanders, Lisa J. Rapport, Robiann Broomfield, Sarah D. Patrick, Emily Flores, Robin A. Hanks, Mark A. Lumley, Scott A. Langenecker, Lauren J. Radigan
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 29 / Issue s1 / November 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 December 2023, pp. 826-827
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
Objective:
Accurate processing of facial displays of emotion is critical for effective communication. A robust literature has documented impairment in the ability to recognize facial affect in people with traumatic brain injury (TBI), but research is scarce about memory for facial affect. Disruptions in recognizing and remembering the emotions of others can undermine relationship quality and may result in psychosocial dysfunction. Importantly, the extant literature indicates that facial affect recognition dissociates from other cognitive abilities such that it is likely a distinct neuronal process. Thus, explicit measurement of affect recognition and memory for emotions may be critical for implementing and refining rehabilitation interventions. The present study examined the relationship between recognition and memory for emotions using a novel computerized task and explored its associations with other cognitive abilities.
Participants and Methods:Participants were adults who were neurologically healthy (n = 31) or had a history of moderate to severe TBI (n = 26). The battery included the novel Assessment of Facial Affect Recognition and Memory (AFARM), Cambridge Face Memory Test (face memory without emotion), Wechsler Test of Adult Reading, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Judgment of Line Orientation, Oral Symbol Digit Modalities, Digit Span, FAS, Animal Fluency, and the Affect Intensity Measure (experienced emotion). Spearman correlations examined the relationship of AFARM performance with the test battery. Logistic regression models examined whether immediate-delay (ID-EM) and long-delay face emotion-memory (LD-EM) accounted for unique variance in group membership beyond recognition accuracy of facial affect and memory for faces.
Results:AFARM demonstrated relationships with neuropsychological and mood variables in the expected directions across and within groups, with the strongest associations observed for memory for verbal information (rs = .51 to .58) and processing speed (rs = .48 to .57). Consistent with traditional list-learning tests, ID- and LD-EM were highly correlated (r = .85). Experienced affect intensity was inversely associated with ID-EM (r = -.29) and LD-EM (r = -.38) but not with recognition accuracy (r = -.10). Logistic regression examining ID-EM was significant, χ2(3) = 26.05, p < .001, Nagelkerke R2 = .49. ID-EM accounted for unique variance in group status (p = .006; OR = 0.65) after accounting for recognition accuracy and face memory. Similarly, the model examining LD-EM was significant χ2(3) = 27.70, p < .001, Nagelkerke R2 = .43; LD-EM was significant after accounting for other variables (p = .017; OR = 0.69).
Conclusions:The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that memory for emotions represents a unique component of social cognition that is separate from recognition. Accuracy in identifying emotions, face recognition memory, and memory for emotions are strongly related but not wholly redundant processes. Consistent with prior literature, subjective experience of emotion had substantial effects on objective performance tasks, indicating that an individual's intense experience of their own emotions can disrupt sensitivity to the emotions of others. Future research should assess the extent to which memory for emotions relates to psychosocial outcomes such as the quality and quantity of interpersonal relationships.
Cognitive estimation in traumatic brain injury
- NOAH D. SILVERBERG, ROBIN A. HANKS, CHERISSE MCKAY
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 13 / Issue 5 / September 2007
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 14 August 2007, pp. 898-902
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
The present study explores the construct and ecological validity of the Biber Cognitive Estimation Test (BCET) in a traumatic brain injury (TBI) sample. Participants completed the BCET in the course of a neuropsychological evaluation at 1–15 years after injury. BCET scores correlated moderately with other standard measures of executive functioning, and contrary to our hypotheses, at least as high with neuropsychological tests with minimal demands on executive functioning. Moreover, partialing out the portion of BCET variance not attributable to executive functioning markedly attenuated the former correlations. With respect to ecological validity, BCET scores did not predict concurrent functional status, as measured by the Disability Rating Scale. By comparison, standard measures of executive functioning strongly correlated with each other, correlated less strongly with nonexecutive functioning measures, and predicted functional status. In conclusion, unlike standard measures of executive functioning, the BCET demonstrated poor construct and ecological validity in TBI patients.(JINS, 2007, 13, 898–902.)
African American acculturation and neuropsychological test performance following traumatic brain injury
- STEPHAN KENNEPOHL, DOUGLAS SHORE, NINA NABORS, ROBIN HANKS
-
- Journal:
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society / Volume 10 / Issue 4 / July 2004
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 July 2004, pp. 566-577
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
The present study examined the influence of African American acculturation on the performance of neuropsychological tests following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Seventy one participants already enrolled in a larger-scale study assessing the impact of TBI (i.e., the South Eastern Michigan Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems project) completed a self-report measure of African American acculturation (African American Acculturation Scale–Short Form; Landrine & Klonoff, 1995) in addition to a standardized battery of neuropsychological tests. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between level of acculturation and test performance after controlling for injury-related (initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, time since injury) and demographic variables (age, sex, years of education, and socioeconomic status). Lower levels of acculturation were associated with significantly poorer performances on the Galveston Orientation & Amnesia Test, MAE Tokens test, WAIS–R Block Design, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Decreased levels of acculturation were also significantly related to lower scores on a composite indicator of overall neuropsychological test performance. In addition, the examiner's ethnicity (Black or White) was related with scores on a few of the tests (i.e., Block Design, Trail Making Test), but was not significantly associated with the overall neuropsychological test performance. Overall, these findings suggest that differences in cultural experience may be an important factor in the neuropsychological assessment of African Americans following TBI, and provide additional support for the hypothesis that cultural factors may partially account for the differences among ethnic/cultural groups on neuropsychological tests. (JINS, 2004, 10, 566–577.)