We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Studies demonstrate higher rates of cardiovascular death among psychiatric patients. Psychotropic medication can prolong the QT interval, increasing the risk of potentially fatal torsade de pointes. Guidelines recommend monitoring QT intervals for patients on psychotropic medication. The QT interval needs to be corrected for heart rate using a correction formula. The most commonly used is Bazett's. However, it becomes less accurate at lower and higher heart rates. Different formulae should be used in such cases. We noted that different formulae gave different QTc intervals for the same ECG posing a clinical management dilemma.
Objectives
To evaluate different QTc correction formulae.
Aims
To find out if using different QTc correction formulae produces consistently different intervals, according to the formula, for a cohort of patients’ ECGs.
Methods
We reviewed 36 ECGs from a cross section of forensic female patients on psychotropic medication.
For each ECG we recorded the ECG calculated QTc and heart rate.
We manually calculated the QTc using Bazett, Fridericia, Hodges and Framingham formulas.
Results
Different formulae produced consistently variable QTc intervals. The discrepancy was greatest at lower and higher heart rates. Many patients had high heart rates making the discrepancy pertinent to our patient cohort.
Conclusions
Psychotropic medication is adjusted according to QTc thresholds which are stipulated in guidelines. At present guidelines do not recommend which QT correction formula to use. Different formulae give different QTc intervals. Our results demonstrate the need for a consensus to be reached and included in guidelines to ensure consistent and safe practice.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.