4 results
Quantitative and qualitative analysis of feedback from The Psychiatry Teaching Programme for Foundation Year doctors rotating through Pennine acute trust from 2010 to 2020
- Angel Namuddu, Margaret Gani, Sarah Burlinson
-
- Journal:
- BJPsych Open / Volume 7 / Issue S1 / June 2021
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 18 June 2021, p. S149
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
Aims
To monitor the year on year trend of feedback scores regarding content, presentation and relevance of sessions delivered as part of the programme by analysing the average Likert scales. To review the confidence post topic from FY feedback. To review qualitative data on the written feedback annually using a word cloud.
MethodCollated data from teaching programme from the various teaching sessions from the past decade and analysed previous teaching reports completed by previous ST leads.
ResultFinding: Relevance: Improvement in the average score year on year, highest in 2018/19 at 4.8/5
Content: Improvement in the average score year on year, highest in 2018/19 at 4.6/5.
Delivery: Improvement in the average score year on year, highest in 2018/19 at 4.6/5.
Qualitative analysis showed that the common themes that were commented on as positives for the session were: interactive, relevant and interesting, for areas for improvements the common themes were: more interaction, split into shorter sessions, faster pace and the need practical advice
ConclusionRecommendations: teaching for FYs should aim to be interactive, relevant and interesting and include practical advice, be shorter and faster paced. Teaching programme organisers to contine to use the foundation year feedback to improve the teaching programme including advising future trainees and organising different topics.
27 - Service models
-
- By Sarah Burlinson, Royal Oldham Hospital, Oldham, UK, Stella Morris, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK
- Edited by Elspeth Guthrie, Sanjay Rao, Melanie Temple
-
- Book:
- Seminars in Liaison Psychiatry
- Published by:
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published online:
- 25 February 2017, pp 428-439
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
The wide diversity of liaison psychiatry services that exists across the UK is striking. It is clear that no one model fits all and that a number of factors including funding streams, historical factors and the enthusiasm and interest of clinicians working in this field have shaped the services in place today. Helpfully, a number of national policies released by the Department of Health over the past few years have begun to enshrine the provision of both a biopsychosocial and multidisciplinary approach to patient care in an increasing number of areas of physical health (see Suggested reading). The shift in delivery of medical care from hospitals to primary care may well influence where further developments within liaison psychiatry services occur.
This chapter is divided into a number of sections each describing a variety of service models in different areas, namely: A&E, wards in the general hospital, out-patient settings and primary care. In addition, a service model that includes the provision of in-patient liaison psychiatry beds is discussed. Finally, the Psychiatric Liaison Accreditation Network (PLAN), a recently launched initiative established to improve and raise the profile of mental health services to general hospitals across the UK and Ireland, is described.
Some services may have the funding and local champions to deliver a comprehensive service to many areas, whereas in others just a small specific development may be possible (e.g. a clinical and supervisory link with a palliative care multidisciplinary team). Wherever the service is to be developed there are four core principles that need to be considered:
the types of clinical problems encountered
the age groups the service will cover
the times of operation provided by the service
the nature of the service offered (i.e. assessment only or assessment and intervention).
Decisions made concerning these issues will in turn determine the most appropriate service model to develop and the size and skill-mix of the liaison team. Managerial arrangements and educational and training roles also need consideration. However, this chapter focuses on the clinical provision of services rather than the latter factors.
27 - Service models
-
- By Sarah Burlinson, Consultant Psychiatrist, Department of Psychological Medicine, Royal Oldham Hospital, Oldham, UK, Stella Morris, Liaison Psychiatrist, Department of Psychological Medicine, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK
- Edited by Elspeth Guthrie, Sanjay Rao, Melanie Temple
-
- Book:
- Seminars in Liaison Psychiatry
- Published online:
- 02 January 2018
- Print publication:
- 01 March 2012, pp 428-439
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
The wide diversity of liaison psychiatry services that exists across the UK is striking. It is clear that no one model fits all and that a number of factors including funding streams, historical factors and the enthusiasm and interest of clinicians working in this field have shaped the services in place today. Helpfully, a number of national policies released by the Department of Health over the past few years have begun to enshrine the provision of both a biopsychosocial and multidisciplinary approach to patient care in an increasing number of areas of physical health (see Suggested reading). The shift in delivery of medical care from hospitals to primary care may well influence where further developments within liaison psychiatry services occur.
This chapter is divided into a number of sections each describing a variety of service models in different areas, namely: A'E, wards in the general hospital, out-patient settings and primary care. In addition, a service model that includes the provision of in-patient liaison psychiatry beds is discussed. Finally, the Psychiatric Liaison Accreditation Network (PLAN), a recently launched initiative established to improve and raise the profile of mental health services to general hospitals across the UK and Ireland, is described.
Some services may have the funding and local champions to deliver a comprehensive service to many areas, whereas in others just a small specific development may be possible (e.g. a clinical and supervisory link with a palliative care multidisciplinary team). Wherever the service is to be developed there are four core principles that need to be considered:
the types of clinical problems encountered
the age groups the service will cover
the times of operation provided by the service
the nature of the service offered (i.e. assessment only or assessment and intervention).
Decisions made concerning these issues will in turn determine the most appropriate service model to develop and the size and skill-mix of the liaison team. Managerial arrangements and educational and training roles also need consideration. However, this chapter focuses on the clinical provision of services rather than the latter factors.
35 - Problem cases
- from Part IV - Treatment
- Edited by Geoffrey Lloyd, Priory Hospital, London, Elspeth Guthrie, University of Manchester
-
- Book:
- Handbook of Liaison Psychiatry
- Published online:
- 10 December 2009
- Print publication:
- 24 May 2007, pp 818-844
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Every referral to liaison psychiatry presents its own clinical dilemmas. Some cases are straightforward and can be assessed and managed easily. Others are complex and require a whole host of liaison skills and a large investment of time. This chapter is composed of a number of 'problem cases'. They are intended to replicate the process of referral, assessment and management by liaison psychiatry. The cases have provided a different perspective and way of thinking about liaison psychiatry which is more familiar to the clinician. It is important to remember that liaison psychiatrists cannot possibly be familiar with the latest developments across the whole of the field of medicine, but they may well be expected to provide advice about patients with a wide range of physical and psychological problems. Mentoring is also useful for newly appointed consultant liaison psychiatrists, where a more experienced liaison psychiatrist can provide support and guidance.