In fundraising, potential candidates who do not collect sizable amounts of “early
money” may be effectively eliminated even before the start of the Iowa Caucus. This
winnowing raises concern about the impact money has on narrowing the field of
candidates from whom voters can choose. To better grasp patterns of successful
fundraising, we explore where candidates obtain funds during the preprimary and
primary periods. We use individual contributions data from the Federal Election
Commission during the preprimary and primary periods of the 2008 Republican
presidential nomination contest. Findings suggest that although California, New
York, and Texas provide disproportionate amounts of early financing, the ability of
presidential aspirants to broaden their support is indicative of campaign
success.