3 results
24 - Escaping the minimalist trap: design and implementation of large-scale biodiversity corridors
- Edited by Kevin R. Crooks, Colorado State University, M. Sanjayan, The Nature Conservancy, Virginia
-
- Book:
- Connectivity Conservation
- Published online:
- 24 May 2010
- Print publication:
- 02 November 2006, pp 620-648
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
INTRODUCTION
Our natural world is on the verge of a profound loss of biological diversity (Crooks and Sanjayan Chapter 1). Although the economic, cultural, and spiritual costs of this ecological impoverishment are enormous and irreversible, from a human point of view extinction's denouement appears to be “slow-motion.” This slow-motion results in a limited recognition of its urgency and the very little time we have to prevent it from occurring. As evident in this volume, the threats cut across multiple scales of ecological organization, from genes and species all the way to ecological processes. To face this complex challenge, action plans to avoid extinction must become more comprehensive, including strategies to preserve both areas and ecological and evolutionary processes, as well as those targeted to avoid the foreseeable extinction of particular threatened species.
One comprehensive regional-scale approach with great promise for effective conservation is based on the concept of “biodiversity conservation corridors,” a large-scale planning region where actions are taken to integrate representation and viability of species, ecosystems, and ecological and evolutionary processes in a scenario of explicitly defined human needs. The biodiversity conservation corridor approach shifts focus from a local to a regional scale, and represents an ambitious attempt to make protected area networks that are sufficient for species survival besides promoting an optimum allocation of resources to conserve biodiversity at the least economic cost to society (Salwasser et al. 1987).
12 - Conservation status and geographic distribution of avian evolutionary history
-
- By Thomas M. Brooks, Conservation Synthesis Department, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, 1919 M St, NW Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036, USA, John D. Pilgrim, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, 1919 M St, NW Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036, USA, Ana S. L. Rodrigues, Conservation Synthesis Department, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, 1919 M St, NW Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036, USA, Gustavo A. B. Da Fonseca, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, 1919 M St, NW Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036, USA
- Edited by Andrew Purvis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, John L. Gittleman, University of Virginia, Thomas Brooks, Conservation International, Washington DC
-
- Book:
- Phylogeny and Conservation
- Published online:
- 04 December 2009
- Print publication:
- 22 September 2005, pp 267-294
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
INTRODUCTION
Phylogeny affects conservation at multiple levels. At the level of the vision of conservation – of the long-term persistence of the processes that maintain biodiversity – phylogeny informs how we should represent these evolutionary processes (see, for example, Chapter 11). At the level of the goal of conservation – of representing the planet's biodiversity in a comprehensive conservation system – phylogeny reveals the units requiring representation (see, for example, Chapter 2). Finally, at the level of conservation strategies, phylogeny gives an extra dimension of biodiversity value that can be incorporated into conservation prioritisation (see, for example, Chapter 5). Here, we explore this third level.
Efficient biodiversity conservation requires systematic prioritisation of efforts; ad hoc planning has significant economic and societal costs (Pressey 1994). In a major review of systematic conservation planning, Margules & Pressey (2000) conceptualised the framework for conservation strategy as requiring two variables: ‘irreplaceability’ and ‘vulnerability’. Irreplaceability refers to uniqueness, or the extent to which a given biodiversity feature will be needed to contribute to a set of conservation values; vulnerability refers to threat, or probability of loss of biodiversity value (Pressey & Taffs 2001). This framework was originally conceived as operating across geographic space (i.e. applied to the prioritisation of sites, whether specific protected sites or broad biogeographic regions). Here, we extend the concept to application across phylogenetic space: prioritisation between species. Throughout this chapter, ‘irreplaceability’ and ‘uniqueness’ are used interchangeably, as are ‘vulnerability’ and ‘threat’.
15 - Primate diversity patterns and their conservation in Amazonia
-
- By José Maria Cardoso Da Silva, Conservation International do Brasil, Av Nazare 541/310, 66035-170 Belém, Pará, Brazil, Anthony B. Rylands, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, 1919 M Street, NW Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036, USA, José S. Silva Júnior, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Departamento de Zoologia, C. P. 399, 66017-970 Belém, Pará, Brazil, Claude Gascon, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, 1919 M Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036, USA, Gustavo A. B. Da Fonseca, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, 1919 M St, NW Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036, USA
- Edited by Andrew Purvis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, John L. Gittleman, University of Virginia, Thomas Brooks, Conservation International, Washington DC
-
- Book:
- Phylogeny and Conservation
- Published online:
- 04 December 2009
- Print publication:
- 22 September 2005, pp 337-364
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
INTRODUCTION
Amazonia is the world's most diverse wilderness area. Encompassing more than 6 million square kilometres in nine countries of northern South America, its biodiversity, in the full meaning of the word, is impressive. Tropical landscapes range from savannas, to forests seasonally and even permanently flooded by the largest rivers in the world, to white-sand forest and scrub, and terra firme forests (Prance 1987). More than one tenth of the world's species occur there (Prance & Lovejoy 1985), with all the untapped genetic resources, increasingly recognised, and exploited, as an essential for our future.
Recent compilations indicate at least 40 000 plant species, 427 mammals, 1294 birds, 378 reptiles, 427 amphibians and around 3000 fishes (Mittermeier et al. 2002). The conservation of Amazonia is a global challenge, given its biodiversity, besides its importance in the regulation of regional hydrological regimes and climate and terrestrial carbon storage (Fearnside 1997, 1999, 2000; Saint-Paul et al. 1999).
A biome-level conservation system for the Amazon requires a good understanding not only of the major biodiversity patterns within the region but also of the relative importance of the evolutionary and ecological processes responsible for their generation and maintenance. In this chapter, we explore these issues; we use primates as a study group and hence update the insights provided by Alfred Russel Wallace (1852) in his remarkable account of primate biogeography in Amazonia. First, we describe the areas of endemism currently recognised for vertebrates in the region.