5 results
An audit of liaison service provision in Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
- Jennifer Rankin, Heledd Espley
-
- Journal:
- BJPsych Open / Volume 7 / Issue S1 / June 2021
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 18 June 2021, p. S99
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
Aims
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (ABUHB) isundertaking a review of the Mental Health Liaison Service provision within it's acute general hospitals. The current liaison service is a small nurse led team which is available between 8am and midnight. ABUHB has recently opened a new Specialist Critical Care Hospital with the liaison service moving into a new base. A new model of care has been developed across the healthboard which has stretched the Liaison Service across several sites. Therefore, the liaison service may need to expanded to be able to provide high quality and timely care across a wide geographical area. The audit aims to idenitfy areas in which the liaison service is performing well in while identiying areas that need improvement. This audit may provide a focus for recommendations to enhance the current liaison provision.
MethodThe liaison service was audited against RCPsych Psychiatric Liaison Accreditation Network (PLAN) quality standards. PLAN identified eighteen functions of a liaison team and provided details of quality standards within each function. These standards are either considered essential, expected or desirable. An accredited service is expected to meet 100% of essential standards, 80% of expected standards and 60% of desirable standards. Data were taken from a combination of sources including ABUHB policies, service managers and senior clinicians within both mental health and acute services.
ResultWhen comparing the current liaison service provision in ABUHB, 30% of essential standards were not met and 21% were only somewhat met. Particular domains that were identifed as needing improvement included policies and procedures and urgent and emergency mental health care. 36% of expected standards were met with 41% not met. Notable domains that the service was performing poorly in included governance; induction, and providing teaching and support to acute colleagues. 89% of desirable standards were not met.
ConclusionThe audit idenitifed that the current liaison service fails to meet core standards set out by RCPsych. This audit provides quantitative data to demonstrate that the liaison service is in need of improvement and investment. As a result, enhaving the current liaison service is now a priortity for the health board. A business case is being developed to consider enhancing the liaison service with a view to developing a Consultant led multidisciplinary team. The business case can use PLAN quality standards to make recommendations for improvements to the service.
Escalation of care planning on an older adult inpatient unit during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Alexander McDermott, Jennifer Rankin
-
- Journal:
- BJPsych Open / Volume 7 / Issue S1 / June 2021
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 18 June 2021, pp. S90-S91
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
Aims
Initial planning during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic involved difficult decision making for many clinicians. The Older Adult Mental Health Wards in Bridgend were relocated from the district general hospital (Princess of Wales) and merged at Angelton Clinic, an off site separate unit. It was therefore essential that patients had clear escalation of care plans as access to medical input was limited and transfer to hospital potentially not appropriate in the later stages of chronic illness such as dementia.
The initial aim of the PDSA cycle was to assess the level of compliance with Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) discussions and if appropriate, DNAR documentation. The other aim was to assess the utilisation of Escalation of Care plans.
MethodAn audit of patients MDT medical notes on 38 admitted to Angelton clinic was carrired out in March. It was documented if the patient had a clear DNAR or Escalation plan that was easily accessible in the front of the notes. The guidelines compared to were the GMC recommendations that patients 12 months of should have a discussion about risks and benefits associated with Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. If the patient lacks capacity a best interest decision should be made with nearest relatives. Discussions should also be had with patients and family in in regards to and transfer to a medical ward.
Upon completion of the initial PDSA cycle, views were sought from the wider MDT a new escalation of care proforma was designed. This was implemented by education and communication with members of the medical team. This was to be clearly placed in the notes, with the DNAR form if that was appropriate.
ResultAll inpatient notes were audited at Angelton Clinic in March 2020. It was found that only 18% of patients had Escalation of Care plans in comparison to 84% of notes which had DNAR forms. Previous escalation of care forms were not being utilised appropriately.
Upon implementation of the Escalation of Care proforma, a re-audit of the audit cyle was completed. In July 2020 it was found that 78% of notes had completed Escalation of Care forms with 83% had completed DNAR forms.
ConclusionTo enable ongoing sustained improvement, the unit Nurse Practitioner will champion its completion. The audit findings have been shared with the newly rotated junior doctors and proformas were made available on all inpatient wards.
An innovative CASC training redesign – ‘experience of virtual mock CASC exam’
- Jennifer Rankin, Jessica Foster, Omer Minhas
-
- Journal:
- BJPsych Open / Volume 7 / Issue S1 / June 2021
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 18 June 2021, p. S153
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
Aims
Cardiff CASC Training (CCT) has provided structured and formal training for the CASC exam for Wales trainees since 2012, in conjunction with Wales Deanery. For the past 8 years CCT has delivered face-to-face mock CASC exams and received excellent feedback from candidates and examiners, in addition to an extremely positive outcome of improvement in CASC pass rate for candidates.
Due to the current COVID-19 pandemic restrictions delivery of the mock CASC examination had to be adapted with the aim of running it remotely via an online platform.
MethodThe examinations were run online via Zoom due to its ease of use, including the ability to screen share candidate instructions and assign participants in to breakout rooms. One lead exam coordinator manually rotated candidates around the circuit of 16 stations.
ResultA total of 16 candidates sat the mock exam over two separate sittings. Written feedback was obtained from candidates and examiners. Limitations identified during the initial sitting included high logistical workload for the lead exam co-ordinator and Zoom not being supported by all hospital computer internet browsers, these issues were addressed prior to the second sitting. Feedback from candidates regarding the overall experience of the online exams ranged from 'extremely effective’ to ‘very effective’, this is in line with feedback obtained following previous face-to-face mock exam events CCT has run.
ConclusionAlthough online learning may feel very different to the face-to-face interactions we are all used to we are in an era where adaption is necessary. These online mock CASC examinations have been a success and are also in keeping with how the real CASC examination is currently being run by the Royal College of Psychiatrists. CCT are running a further online mock examination to support the next cohort of candidates through their CASC exam in this particularly challenging time.
Contributors
-
- By Tod C. Aeby, Melanie D. Altizer, Ronan A. Bakker, Meghann E. Batten, Anita K. Blanchard, Brian Bond, Megan A. Brady, Saweda A. Bright, Ellen L. Brock, Amy Brown, Ashley Carroll, Jori S. Carter, Frances Casey, Weldon Chafe, David Chelmow, Jessica M. Ciaburri, Stephen A. Cohen, Adrianne M. Colton, PonJola Coney, Jennifer A. Cross, Julie Zemaitis DeCesare, Layson L. Denney, Megan L. Evans, Nicole S. Fanning, Tanaz R. Ferzandi, Katie P. Friday, Nancy D. Gaba, Rajiv B. Gala, Andrew Galffy, Adrienne L. Gentry, Edward J. Gill, Philippe Girerd, Meredith Gray, Amy Hempel, Audra Jolyn Hill, Chris J. Hong, Kathryn A. Houston, Patricia S. Huguelet, Warner K. Huh, Jordan Hylton, Christine R. Isaacs, Alison F. Jacoby, Isaiah M. Johnson, Nicole W. Karjane, Emily E. Landers, Susan M. Lanni, Eduardo Lara-Torre, Lee A. Learman, Nikola Alexander Letham, Rachel K. Love, Richard Scott Lucidi, Elisabeth McGaw, Kimberly Woods McMorrow, Christopher A. Manipula, Kirk J. Matthews, Michelle Meglin, Megan Metcalf, Sarah H. Milton, Gaby Moawad, Christopher Morosky, Lindsay H. Morrell, Elizabeth L. Munter, Erin L. Murata, Amanda B. Murchison, Nguyet A. Nguyen, Nan G. O’Connell, Tony Ogburn, K. Nathan Parthasarathy, Thomas C. Peng, Ashley Peterson, Sarah Peterson, John G. Pierce, Amber Price, Heidi J. Purcell, Ronald M. Ramus, Nicole Calloway Rankins, Fidelma B. Rigby, Amanda H. Ritter, Barbara L. Robinson, Danielle Roncari, Lisa Rubinsak, Jennifer Salcedo, Mary T. Sale, Peter F. Schnatz, John W. Seeds, Kathryn Shaia, Karen Shelton, Megan M. Shine, Haller J. Smith, Roger P. Smith, Nancy A. Sokkary, Reni A. Soon, Aparna Sridhar, Lilja Stefansson, Laurie S. Swaim, Chemen M. Tate, Hong-Thao Thieu, Meredith S. Thomas, L. Chesney Thompson, Tiffany Tonismae, Angela M. Tran, Breanna Walker, Alan G. Waxman, C. Nathan Webb, Valerie L. Williams, Sarah B. Wilson, Elizabeth M. Yoselevsky, Amy E. Young
- Edited by David Chelmow, Virginia Commonwealth University, Christine R. Isaacs, Virginia Commonwealth University, Ashley Carroll, Virginia Commonwealth University
-
- Book:
- Acute Care and Emergency Gynecology
- Published online:
- 05 November 2014
- Print publication:
- 30 October 2014, pp ix-xiv
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
Forming Professional Bioethicists: The Program at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville
- MICHELE CARTER, H. PHILLIPS HAMLIN, JENNIFER HEYL, GLENN C. GRABER, JAMES LINDEMANN NELSON, LINDA A. RANKIN
-
- Journal:
- Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics / Volume 9 / Issue 3 / July 2000
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 01 July 2000, pp. 418-423
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
As a way of contributing to bioethics' understanding of itself, and, more particularly, to invigorate conversation about how we can best educate future colleagues, we present here a sketch of the quarter-century-old graduate concentration in medical ethics housed in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Our hope is to incite other programs to share their histories, strategies, problems, and aspirations, so as to help the field as a whole get a clearer sense of how we are putting together our future, and of how we might best go about this important job.