3 results
Is the input to a GABAergic or cholinergic synapse the sole asymmetry in rabbit's retinal directional selectivity?
- Norberto M. Grzywacz, John S. Tootle, Franklin R. Amthor
-
- Journal:
- Visual Neuroscience / Volume 14 / Issue 1 / January 1997
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 June 2009, pp. 39-54
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
We examined contrast, direction of motion, and concentration dependencies of the effects of GABAergic and cholinergic antagonists, and anticholinesterases on responses to movement of On—Off directionally selective (DS) ganglion cells of the rabbit's retina. The drugs tested were curare and hexamethonium bromide (cholinergic antagonists), physostigmine (anticholinesterase), and picrotoxin (GABAergic antagonist). They all reduced the cells' directional selectivity, while maintaining their preferred-null axis. However, cholinergic antagonists did not block directional selectivity completely even at saturating concentrations. The failure to eliminate directional selectivity was probably not due to an incomplete blockade of cholinergic receptors. In a extension of a Masland and Ames (1976) experiment, saturating concentrations of antagonists blocked the effects of exogenous acetylcholine or nicotine applied during synaptic blockade. Consequently, a noncholinergic pathway may be sufficient to account for at least some directional selectivity. This putative pathway interacts with the cholinergic pathway before spike generation, since physostigmine eliminated directional selectivity at contrasts lower than those saturating responses. This elimination apparently resulted from cholinergic-induced saturation, since reduction of contrast restored directional selectivity. Under picrotoxin, directional selectivity was lost in 33% of the cells regardless of contrast. However, 47% maintained their preferred direction despite saturating concentrations of picrotoxin, and 20% reversed the preferred and null directions. Therefore, models based solely on a GABAergic implementation of Barlow and Levick's asymmetric-inhibition model or solely on a cholinergic implementation of asymmetric-excitation models are not complete models of directional selectivity in the rabbit. We propose an alternate model for this retinal property.
Stimulus-dependent correlated firing in directionally selective retinal ganglion cells
- FRANKLIN R. AMTHOR, JOHN S. TOOTLE, NORBERTO M. GRZYWACZ
-
- Journal:
- Visual Neuroscience / Volume 22 / Issue 6 / November 2005
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 03 February 2006, pp. 769-787
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Synchronous spiking has been postulated to be a meta-signal in visual cortex and other CNS loci that tags neuronal spike responses to a single entity. In retina, however, synchronized spikes have been postulated to arise via mechanisms that would largely preclude their carrying such a code. One such mechanism is gap junction coupling, in which synchronous spikes would be a by-product of lateral signal sharing. Synchronous spikes have also been postulated to arise from common-source inputs to retinal ganglion cells having overlapping receptive fields, and thus code for stimulus location in the overlap area. On–Off directionally selective ganglion cells of the rabbit retina exhibit a highly precise tiling pattern in which gap junction coupling occurs between some neighboring, same-preferred-direction cells. Depending on how correlated spikes arise, and for what purpose, one could postulate that synchronized spikes in this system (1) always arise in some subset of same-direction cells because of gap junctions, but never in non-same-preferred-directional cells; (2) never arise in same-directional cells because their receptive fields do not overlap, but arise only in different-directional cells whose receptive fields overlap, as a code for location in the overlap region; or (3) arise in a stimulus-dependent manner for both same- and different-preferred-direction cells for a function similar to that postulated for neurons in visual cortex. Simultaneous, extracellular recordings were obtained from neighboring On–Off directionally selective (DS) ganglion cells having the same and different preferred directions in an isolated rabbit retinal preparation. Stimulation by large flashing spots elicited responses from DS ganglion-cell pairs that typically showed little synchronous firing. Movement of extended bars, however, often produced synchronous spikes in cells having similar or orthogonal preferred directions. Surprisingly, correlated firing could occur for the opposite contrast polarity edges of moving stimuli when the leading edge of a sweeping bar excited the receptive field of one cell as its trailing edge stimulated another. Pharmacological manipulations showed that the spike synchronization is enhanced by excitatory cholinergic amacrine-cell inputs, and reduced by inhibitory GABAergic inputs, in a motion-specific manner. One possible interpretation is that this synchronous firing could be a signal to higher centers that the outputs of the two DS ganglion cells should be “bound” together as responding to a contour of a common object.
Retinal ganglion cell coding in simulated active vision
- FRANKLIN R. AMTHOR, JOHN S. TOOTLE, TIMOTHY J. GAWNE
-
- Journal:
- Visual Neuroscience / Volume 22 / Issue 6 / November 2005
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 03 February 2006, pp. 789-806
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
The image on the retina is almost never static. Eye, head, and body movements, and externally generated motion create rapid and continual changes in the retinal image (“active vision”). Virtually all vision in animals such as primates, which make saccades as often as 3–4 times/s, is based on information that must be derived from the first few hundred milliseconds after sudden, global changes in the retinal image. These changes may be accompanied by large changes in area mean luminance, as well as higher order image contrast statistics. This study investigated how retinal ganglion cell responses, whose response properties have been typically studied and defined in a stable stimulus regime, are affected by sudden changes in mean luminance that are characteristic of active vision. Specifically, the steady-state responses of retinal ganglion cells to static or moving square-wave grating stimuli were recorded in an isolated, superfused rabbit eyecup preparation and compared to responses after saccade-like changes in luminance. The manner of coding after luminance changes was different for different ganglion cell classes; both suppression and enhancement of responses to patterns following luminance changes were found. Brisk-transient Off cells unambiguously signaled the darkening of the overall image, but were also modulated by the subsequently appearing grating stimulus. Several types of On-center cell behavior were observed, ranging from strong suppression of the subsequent response by luminance changes, to strong enhancement. Overall, most ganglion cells distinguished static patterns after a luminance change via differences in their spike discharges nearly as well as before, although there were clear asymmetries between the On and Off pathways. Changes in mean luminance in some ganglion cells, such as On–Off directionally selective ganglion cells, could create large phase shifts in the response to patterned, moving stimuli, although these stimuli were still detected immediately after luminance changes. The results of this study show that the image dynamics of active vision may be a fundamental challenge for the visual system because of strong effects on retinal ganglion cell function. However, rapid extraction of unambiguous information after luminance changes appears to be encoded in differences in the spike discharges in different retinal ganglion cell classes. Asymmetries among ganglion cell classes in sensitivity to luminance changes may provide a basis by which some provide the “context” for interpreting the firing of others.