The longevity of Cassini’s exploration of Saturn’s atmosphere (a third of a Saturnian year) means that we have been able to track the seasonal evolution of atmospheric temperatures, chemistry and cloud opacity over almost every season, from solstice to solstice and from perihelion to aphelion. Cassini has built upon the decades-long ground-based record to observe seasonal shifts in atmospheric temperature, finding a thermal response that lags behind the seasonal insolation with a lag time that increases with depth into the atmosphere, in agreement with radiative climate models. Seasonal hemispheric contrasts are perturbed at smaller scales by atmospheric circulation, such as belt/zone dynamics, the equatorial oscillations and the polar vortices. Temperature asymmetries are largest in the middle stratosphere and become insignificant near the radiative-convective boundary. Cassini has also measured southern-summertime asymmetries in atmospheric composition, including ammonia (the key species forming the topmost clouds), phosphine and para-hydrogen (both disequilibrium species) in the upper troposphere; and hydrocarbons deriving from the UV photolysis of methane in the stratosphere (principally ethane and acetylene). These chemical asymmetries are now altering in subtle ways due to (i) the changing chemical efficiencies with temperature and insolation and (ii) vertical motions associated with large-scale overturning in response to the seasonal temperature contrasts. Similarly, hemispheric contrasts in tropospheric aerosol opacity and coloration that were identified during the earliest phases of Cassini’s exploration have now reversed, suggesting an intricate link between the clouds and the temperatures. Finally, comparisons of observations between Voyager and Cassini (both observing in early northern spring, one Saturn year apart) show tantalizing suggestions of non-seasonal variability. Disentangling the competing effects of radiative balance, chemistry and dynamics in shaping the seasonal evolution of Saturn’s temperatures, clouds and composition remains the key challenge for the next generation of observations and numerical simulations.
One-dimensional photochemical models are used to provide an assessment of the chemical composition of the Shoemaker-Levy 9 impact sites soon after the impacts, and over time, as the impact-derived molecular species evolve due to photochemical processes. Photochemical model predictions are compared with the observed temporal variation of the impact-derived molecules in order to place constraints on the initial composition at the impact sites and on the amount of aerosol debris deposited in the stratosphere. The time variation of NH3, HCN, OCS, and H2S in the photochemical models roughly parallels that of the observations. S2 persists too long in the photochemical models, suggesting that some of the estimated chemical rates constants and/or initial conditions (e.g., the assumed altitude distribution or abundance of S2) are incorrect. Models predict that CS and CO persist for months or years in the jovian stratosphere. Observations indicate that the model results with regard to CS are qualitatively correct (although the measured CS abundance demonstrates the need for a larger assumed initial abundance of CS in the models), but that CO appears to be more stable in the models than is indicated by observations. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. We use model-data comparisons to learn more about the unique photochemical processes occurring after the impacts.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.