4 results
10 - Saturn’s Seasonally Changing Atmosphere
- Edited by Kevin H. Baines, University of Wisconsin, Madison, F. Michael Flasar, NASA-Goddard Space Flight Center, Norbert Krupp, Tom Stallard, University of Leicester
-
- Book:
- Saturn in the 21st Century
- Published online:
- 13 December 2018
- Print publication:
- 06 December 2018, pp 251-294
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
The longevity of Cassini’s exploration of Saturn’s atmosphere (a third of a Saturnian year) means that we have been able to track the seasonal evolution of atmospheric temperatures, chemistry and cloud opacity over almost every season, from solstice to solstice and from perihelion to aphelion. Cassini has built upon the decades-long ground-based record to observe seasonal shifts in atmospheric temperature, finding a thermal response that lags behind the seasonal insolation with a lag time that increases with depth into the atmosphere, in agreement with radiative climate models. Seasonal hemispheric contrasts are perturbed at smaller scales by atmospheric circulation, such as belt/zone dynamics, the equatorial oscillations and the polar vortices. Temperature asymmetries are largest in the middle stratosphere and become insignificant near the radiative-convective boundary. Cassini has also measured southern-summertime asymmetries in atmospheric composition, including ammonia (the key species forming the topmost clouds), phosphine and para-hydrogen (both disequilibrium species) in the upper troposphere; and hydrocarbons deriving from the UV photolysis of methane in the stratosphere (principally ethane and acetylene). These chemical asymmetries are now altering in subtle ways due to (i) the changing chemical efficiencies with temperature and insolation and (ii) vertical motions associated with large-scale overturning in response to the seasonal temperature contrasts. Similarly, hemispheric contrasts in tropospheric aerosol opacity and coloration that were identified during the earliest phases of Cassini’s exploration have now reversed, suggesting an intricate link between the clouds and the temperatures. Finally, comparisons of observations between Voyager and Cassini (both observing in early northern spring, one Saturn year apart) show tantalizing suggestions of non-seasonal variability. Disentangling the competing effects of radiative balance, chemistry and dynamics in shaping the seasonal evolution of Saturn’s temperatures, clouds and composition remains the key challenge for the next generation of observations and numerical simulations.
The science of EChO
- Giovanna Tinetti, James Y-K. Cho, Caitlin A. Griffith, Olivier Grasset, Lee Grenfell, Tristan Guillot, Tommi T. Koskinen, Julianne I. Moses, David Pinfield, Jonathan Tennyson, Marcell Tessenyi, Robin Wordsworth, Alan Aylward, Roy van Boekel, Angioletta Coradini, Therese Encrenaz, Ignas Snellen, Maria R. Zapatero-Osorio, Jeroen Bouwman, Vincent Coudé du Foresto, Mercedes Lopez-Morales, Ingo Mueller-Wodarg, Enric Pallé, Franck Selsis, Alessandro Sozzetti, Jean-Philippe Beaulieu, Thomas Henning, Michael Meyer, Giuseppina Micela, Ignasi Ribas, Daphne Stam, Mark Swain, Oliver Krause, Marc Ollivier, Emanuele Pace, Bruce Swinyard, Peter A.R. Ade, Nick Achilleos, Alberto Adriani, Craig B. Agnor, Cristina Afonso, Carlos Allende Prieto, Gaspar Bakos, Robert J. Barber, Michael Barlow, Peter Bernath, Bruno Bézard, Pascal Bordé, Linda R. Brown, Arnaud Cassan, Céline Cavarroc, Angela Ciaravella, Charles Cockell, Athéna Coustenis, Camilla Danielski, Leen Decin, Remco De Kok, Olivier Demangeon, Pieter Deroo, Peter Doel, Pierre Drossart, Leigh N. Fletcher, Matteo Focardi, Francois Forget, Steve Fossey, Pascal Fouqué, James Frith, Marina Galand, Patrick Gaulme, Jonay I. González Hernández, Davide Grassi, Matt J. Griffin, Ulrich Grözinger, Manuel Guedel, Pactrick Guio, Olivier Hainaut, Robert Hargreaves, Peter H. Hauschildt, Kevin Heng, David Heyrovsky, Ricardo Hueso, Pat Irwin, Lisa Kaltenegger, Patrick Kervella, David Kipping, Geza Kovacs, Antonino La Barbera, Helmut Lammer, Emmanuel Lellouch, Giuseppe Leto, Mercedes Lopez Morales, Miguel A. Lopez Valverde, Manuel Lopez-Puertas, Christophe Lovi, Antonio Maggio, Jean-Pierre Maillard, Jesus Maldonado Prado, Jean-Baptiste Marquette, Francisco J. Martin-Torres, Pierre Maxted, Steve Miller, Sergio Molinari, David Montes, Amaya Moro-Martin, Olivier Mousis, Napoléon Nguyen Tuong, Richard Nelson, Glenn S. Orton, Eric Pantin, Enzo Pascale, Stefano Pezzuto, Ennio Poretti, Raman Prinja, Loredana Prisinzano, Jean-Michel Réess, Ansgar Reiners, Benjamin Samuel, Jorge Sanz Forcada, Dimitar Sasselov, Giorgio Savini, Bruno Sicardy, Alan Smith, Lars Stixrude, Giovanni Strazzulla, Gautam Vasisht, Sandrine Vinatier, Serena Viti, Ingo Waldmann, Glenn J. White, Thomas Widemann, Roger Yelle, Yuk Yung, Sergey Yurchenko
-
- Journal:
- Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union / Volume 6 / Issue S276 / October 2010
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 10 November 2011, pp. 359-370
- Print publication:
- October 2010
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
The science of extra-solar planets is one of the most rapidly changing areas of astrophysics and since 1995 the number of planets known has increased by almost two orders of magnitude. A combination of ground-based surveys and dedicated space missions has resulted in 560-plus planets being detected, and over 1200 that await confirmation. NASA's Kepler mission has opened up the possibility of discovering Earth-like planets in the habitable zone around some of the 100,000 stars it is surveying during its 3 to 4-year lifetime. The new ESA's Gaia mission is expected to discover thousands of new planets around stars within 200 parsecs of the Sun. The key challenge now is moving on from discovery, important though that remains, to characterisation: what are these planets actually like, and why are they as they are?
In the past ten years, we have learned how to obtain the first spectra of exoplanets using transit transmission and emission spectroscopy. With the high stability of Spitzer, Hubble, and large ground-based telescopes the spectra of bright close-in massive planets can be obtained and species like water vapour, methane, carbon monoxide and dioxide have been detected. With transit science came the first tangible remote sensing of these planetary bodies and so one can start to extrapolate from what has been learnt from Solar System probes to what one might plan to learn about their faraway siblings. As we learn more about the atmospheres, surfaces and near-surfaces of these remote bodies, we will begin to build up a clearer picture of their construction, history and suitability for life.
The Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory, EChO, will be the first dedicated mission to investigate the physics and chemistry of Exoplanetary Atmospheres. By characterising spectroscopically more bodies in different environments we will take detailed planetology out of the Solar System and into the Galaxy as a whole.
EChO has now been selected by the European Space Agency to be assessed as one of four M3 mission candidates.
SL9 impact chemistry: Long-term photochemical evolution
-
- By Julianne I. Moses, Lunar and Planetary Institute, 3600 Bay Area Blvd., Houston, TX 77058-1113, USA
- Edited by Keith S. Noll, Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Harold A. Weaver, Applied Research Corporation, Landover, Maryland, Paul D. Feldman, The Johns Hopkins University
-
- Book:
- The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter
- Published online:
- 12 September 2009
- Print publication:
- 26 July 1996, pp 243-268
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
One-dimensional photochemical models are used to provide an assessment of the chemical composition of the Shoemaker-Levy 9 impact sites soon after the impacts, and over time, as the impact-derived molecular species evolve due to photochemical processes. Photochemical model predictions are compared with the observed temporal variation of the impact-derived molecules in order to place constraints on the initial composition at the impact sites and on the amount of aerosol debris deposited in the stratosphere. The time variation of NH3, HCN, OCS, and H2S in the photochemical models roughly parallels that of the observations. S2 persists too long in the photochemical models, suggesting that some of the estimated chemical rates constants and/or initial conditions (e.g., the assumed altitude distribution or abundance of S2) are incorrect. Models predict that CS and CO persist for months or years in the jovian stratosphere. Observations indicate that the model results with regard to CS are qualitatively correct (although the measured CS abundance demonstrates the need for a larger assumed initial abundance of CS in the models), but that CO appears to be more stable in the models than is indicated by observations. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. We use model-data comparisons to learn more about the unique photochemical processes occurring after the impacts.
SL9 impact chemistry: Long-term photochemical evolution
- Julianne I. Moses
-
- Journal:
- International Astronomical Union Colloquium / Volume 156 / May 1996
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 02 August 2016, pp. 243-268
- Print publication:
- May 1996
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Export citation
-
One-dimensional photochemical models are used to provide an assessment of the chemical composition of the Shoemaker-Levy 9 impact sites soon after the impacts, and over time, as the impact-derived molecular species evolve due to photochemical processes. Photochemical model predictions are compared with the observed temporal variation of the impact-derived molecules in order to place constraints on the initial composition at the impact sites and on the amount of aerosol debris deposited in the stratosphere. The time variation of NH3, HCN, OCS, and H2S in the photochemical models roughly parallels that of the observations. S2 persists too long in the photochemical models, suggesting that some of the estimated chemical rates constants and/or initial conditions (e.g., the assumed altitude distribution or abundance of S2) are incorrect. Models predict that CS and CO persist for months or years in the jovian stratosphere. Observations indicate that the model results with regard to CS are qualitatively correct (although the measured CS abundance demonstrates the need for a larger assumed initial abundance of CS in the models), but that CO appears to be more stable in the models than is indicated by observations. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown. We use model-data comparisons to learn more about the unique photochemical processes occurring after the impacts.