We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Depression and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are frequently comorbid psychiatric disorders that reliably share deficits in executive functioning (EF). In addition to EF, meta-analytic evidence indicates that processing speed and verbal memory are also affected in depression and BPD, but the impact of BPD further spans the domains of attention, nonverbal memory, and visuospatial abilities. Suicidality is a notable phenotypic commonality in depression and BPD. Neuropsychologically, there are consistent discrepancies between individuals who have and have not thought about suicide in global cognitive functioning, as well as between those who have attempted suicide and those who have just thought about suicide in EF. This study aims to replicate the effect size differences between these groups and explore whether neuropsychological functioning relates to dimensional measures of psychopathology.
Participants and Methods:
Right-handed women between the ages of 18 and 55 were recruited into one of three diagnostic groups: a) current major depressive episode (MDD; n=22); b) current major depressive episode with comorbid BPD (MDD+BPD; n=19); and c) absence of current major depressive episode and BPD (controls; n=20). Groups were also classified based on historical suicide attempt and on the presence or absence of historical suicidal ideation. Exclusions included bipolar disorder, neurodevelopmental disorder, moderate/severe brain injury, neurological illness, serious physical illness, eating disorder, and moderate/severe alcohol/substance use disorder. Participants were administered the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ), UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale, Everyday Memory Questionnaire, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVMT), California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color-Word Interference Test, D-KEFS Trail Making Test, D-KEFS Verbal Fluency, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Coding and Digit Span subtests, Wechsler Memory Scale-IV Logical Memory, and Wechsler Test of Adult Reading.
Results:
With one exception, analyses of raw scores indicated there were no significant neuropsychological differences between groups based on diagnosis, historical suicidal ideation, and suicide attempt (p>.05). However, individuals with MDD+BPD, historical suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt endorsed more memory complaints than the other groups with large effect size differences. Differences in self-reported impulsivity indicated large effects between controls and MDD+BPD, moderate to large effects when comparing controls to MDD and MDD to MDD+BPD, and moderate effects among the suicidal ideation and suicide attempt groups. Impulsivity was rated highest in those with MDD+BPD, historical suicidal ideation, or suicide attempt. These analyses applied false-discovery rate correction and adjusted for age. Using ridge regressions to separately predict depressive symptoms, BPD symptoms, and suicide risk factors, neuropsychological indices were most associated with suicide risk factors and explained 22.8% of INQ variance. Conversely, these indices explained 9.6% of ZAN-BPD variance and 0.6% of BDI-II variance.
Conclusions:
The neuropsychological literature on BPD describes moderate crosscutting neuropsychological dysfunction, and clarifying the distinct cognitive alterations associated with comorbid psychiatric disorders and suicide phenomena offers novel avenues of research for investigating their mechanisms. While neuropsychological functioning may not strongly relate to psychiatric symptomatology, it may contribute to meaningful algorithms of suicide risk in individuals with depression and BPD.
The goal of affective neuroscience research is to integrate as many measures as possible when attempting to gauge affective experience. This chapter examines the value of objective and subjective measures used in affective neuroscience. It presents examples that showcase the use of the response indices, illustrating how objective and subjective measures operate uniquely and offer opportunities to investigate the properties of emotion from different vantage points. The chapter addresses some limitations to measurement and comments on work that is pushing research forward by combining measures with inventive methods. Future research that investigates deeply experiential aspects of the human emotional life will benefit from employing a network of measures to provide a more in-depth understanding of the neurophenomenology of emotion. The challenge before affective neuroscientists is to include and integrate multiple indices from both subjective and objective categories of measurement to best capture the mental and neural bases of emotional life.