2 results
Somatic, positive and negative domains of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies
- A. Demirkan, J. Lahti, N. Direk, A. Viktorin, K. L. Lunetta, A. Terracciano, M. A. Nalls, T. Tanaka, K. Hek, M. Fornage, J. Wellmann, M. C. Cornelis, H. M. Ollila, L. Yu, J. A. Smith, L. C. Pilling, A. Isaacs, A. Palotie, W. V. Zhuang, A. Zonderman, J. D. Faul, A. Sutin, O. Meirelles, A. Mulas, A. Hofman, A. Uitterlinden, F. Rivadeneira, M. Perola, W. Zhao, V. Salomaa, K. Yaffe, A. I. Luik, NABEC, UKBEC, Y. Liu, J. Ding, P. Lichtenstein, M. Landén, E. Widen, D. R. Weir, D. J. Llewellyn, A. Murray, S. L. R. Kardia, J. G. Eriksson, K. Koenen, P. K. E. Magnusson, L. Ferrucci, T. H. Mosley, F. Cucca, B. A. Oostra, D. A. Bennett, T. Paunio, K. Berger, T. B. Harris, N. L. Pedersen, J. M. Murabito, H. Tiemeier, C. M. van Duijn, K. Räikkönen
-
- Journal:
- Psychological Medicine / Volume 46 / Issue 8 / June 2016
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 21 March 2016, pp. 1613-1623
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Background
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is moderately heritable, however genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for MDD, as well as for related continuous outcomes, have not shown consistent results. Attempts to elucidate the genetic basis of MDD may be hindered by heterogeneity in diagnosis. The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale provides a widely used tool for measuring depressive symptoms clustered in four different domains which can be combined together into a total score but also can be analysed as separate symptom domains.
MethodWe performed a meta-analysis of GWAS of the CES-D symptom clusters. We recruited 12 cohorts with the 20- or 10-item CES-D scale (32 528 persons).
ResultsOne single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs713224, located near the brain-expressed melatonin receptor (MTNR1A) gene, was associated with the somatic complaints domain of depression symptoms, with borderline genome-wide significance (pdiscovery = 3.82 × 10−8). The SNP was analysed in an additional five cohorts comprising the replication sample (6813 persons). However, the association was not consistent among the replication sample (pdiscovery+replication = 1.10 × 10−6) with evidence of heterogeneity.
ConclusionsDespite the effort to harmonize the phenotypes across cohorts and participants, our study is still underpowered to detect consistent association for depression, even by means of symptom classification. On the contrary, the SNP-based heritability and co-heritability estimation results suggest that a very minor part of the variation could be captured by GWAS, explaining the reason of sparse findings.
Cognition, structural brain changes and complicated grief. A population-based study
- H. C. Saavedra Pérez, M. A. Ikram, N. Direk, H. G. Prigerson, R. Freak-Poli, B. F. J. Verhaaren, A. Hofman, M. Vernooij, H. Tiemeier
-
- Journal:
- Psychological Medicine / Volume 45 / Issue 7 / May 2015
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 03 November 2014, pp. 1389-1399
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Background
Several psychosocial risk factors for complicated grief have been described. However, the association of complicated grief with cognitive and biological risk factors is unclear. The present study examined whether complicated grief and normal grief are related to cognitive performance or structural brain volumes in a large population-based study.
MethodThe present research comprised cross-sectional analyses embedded in the Rotterdam Study. The study included 5501 non-demented persons. Participants were classified as experiencing no grief (n = 4731), normal grief (n = 615) or complicated grief (n = 155) as assessed with the Inventory of Complicated Grief. All persons underwent cognitive testing (Mini-Mental State Examination, Letter–Digit Substitution Test, Stroop Test, Word Fluency Task, word learning test – immediate and delayed recall), and magnetic resonance imaging to measure general brain parameters (white matter, gray matter), and white matter lesions. Total brain volume was defined as the sum of gray matter plus normal white matter and white matter lesion volume. Persons with depressive disorders were excluded and analyses were adjusted for depressive symptoms.
ResultsCompared with no-grief participants, participants with complicated grief had lower scores for the Letter–Digit Substitution Test [Z-score −0.16 v. 0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.36 to −0.04, p = 0.01] and Word Fluency Task (Z-score −0.15 v. 0.03, 95% CI −0.35 to −0.02, p = 0.02) and smaller total volumes of brain matter (933.53 ml v. 952.42 ml, 95% CI −37.6 to −0.10, p = 0.04).
ConclusionsParticipants with complicated grief performed poorly in cognitive tests and had a smaller total brain volume. Although the effect sizes were small, these findings suggest that there may be a neurological correlate of complicated grief, but not of normal grief, in the general population.