We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The COVID-19 pandemic created stressors to daily living, leading to increased mental health problems. It is important to assess the influence of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, specifically anxiety.
Objectives
The goal was to determine the prevalence and sociodemographic, clinical, and other correlates of likely Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) among study subjects in Ghana.
Design
This study employed a cross-sectional approach, using an online survey administered primarily through social media platforms. The survey questions included the GAD-7 scale, which was used to assess likely GAD in respondents. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression analysis.
Participants
Overall, 756 respondents completed the survey, mainly from Ashanti and Greater Accra, which were the hardest hit by COVID-19.
Results
The prevalence of likely GAD in our sample was 7.6%. Gender, loss of job due to COVID-19, and seeking mental health counseling were independently associated with increased likelihood of GAD.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that women, those who lost their jobs due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and those who sought mental health counseling were more likely to experience moderate to high anxiety symptoms as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Priority must be attached to psychological support measures for members of these groups.
Although the cognitive profiles of people experiencing homelessness have been described in the literature, the neuropsychological profile of people experiencing complex homelessness has not been delineated. Complex homelessness is homelessness that continues despite the provision of bricks and mortar solutions. People experiencing complex homelessness often have an array of physical health, mental health, substance use, neurodevelopmental and neurocognitive disorders. The present study aimed to delineate the neuropsychological profile of people experiencing complex homelessness and explore the utility of neuropsychological assessment in supporting this population.
Participants and Methods:
19 people experiencing complex homelessness in Sydney, Australia, were consecutively referred by specialist homelessness services for neuropsychological assessment. They underwent comprehensive assessment of intelligence, memory and executive functioning and completed questionnaires to screen for the presence of ADHD, PTSD, depression, anxiety and stress. A range of performance validity measures were included. Referrers were asked to complete questionnaires on history of childhood trauma, psychological functioning, drug and alcohol use, functional cognitive abilities, homelessness factors, personality, risk of cognitive impairment and adaptive functioning and to note existing or suspected mental health, neurodevelopmental and neurocognitive disorders. Referrers also completed a post-assessment pathways questionnaires to identify whether the neuropsychological assessment facilitated referral pathways (e.g., for government housing or financial assistance). Clinicians completed a post-assessment diagnosis survey, which was compared to the pre-assessment known or suspected diagnoses. Finally, referrers were asked to complete a satisfaction questionnaire regarding the neuropsychological assessment.
Results:
Mean (SD) WAIS-IV indexes were VCI = 81.1 (14.5), PRI = 86.1 (10.9), WMI = 80.5 (13.0), PSI = 81.6 (10.2). Mean WMS-IV Flexible (LMVR) indexes were AMI = 68.3 (19.6), VMI = 77.1 (19.3), IMI = 72.7 (17.2), and DMI = 70.5 (17.6). The majority of participants showed unusual differences between WAIS-IV and TOPF-predicted WAIS-IV scores and between WAIS-IV General Ability and WMS-IV Flexible (LMVR) scores. Demographically corrected scores on tests of executive functioning were mostly one or more standard deviations below the mean. The majority of participants screened positive on screening measures of executive dysfunction, PTSD and ADHD and had elevated self-reported psychological distress scores. At least one new diagnosis was made for nine (47%) participants, established diagnoses were confirmed for two (11%) participants, diagnoses were supported for 15 (79%) participants, tentative diagnoses were made for 16 (84%) participants, and five (26%) participants had at least one diagnosis disconfirmed/unsupported. Referrers indicated that the majority of post-assessment pathways were more accessible following the neuropsychological assessment and that they were very satisfied with the neuropsychological assessments overall.
Conclusions:
This is one of the first studies to delineate the neuropsychological profile of people experiencing complex homelessness using robust psychometric approaches, including performance validity tests. This population experiences a high burden of cognitive impairment and associated substance use, neurodevelopmental and mental health comorbidities. Neuropsychological assessment makes referral pathways more accessible and is valued by referrers of people experiencing complex homelessness.
Various water-based heater-cooler devices (HCDs) have been implicated in nontuberculous mycobacteria outbreaks. Ongoing rigorous surveillance for healthcare-associated M. abscessus (HA-Mab) put in place following a prior institutional outbreak of M. abscessus alerted investigators to a cluster of 3 extrapulmonary M. abscessus infections among patients who had undergone cardiothoracic surgery.
Methods:
Investigators convened a multidisciplinary team and launched a comprehensive investigation to identify potential sources of M. abscessus in the healthcare setting. Adherence to tap water avoidance protocols during patient care and HCD cleaning, disinfection, and maintenance practices were reviewed. Relevant environmental samples were obtained. Patient and environmental M. abscessus isolates were compared using multilocus-sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Smoke testing was performed to evaluate the potential for aerosol generation and dispersion during HCD use. The entire HCD fleet was replaced to mitigate continued transmission.
Results:
Clinical presentations of case patients and epidemiologic data supported intraoperative acquisition. M. abscessus was isolated from HCDs used on patients and molecular comparison with patient isolates demonstrated clonality. Smoke testing simulated aerosolization of M. abscessus from HCDs during device operation. Because the HCD fleet was replaced, no additional extrapulmonary HA-Mab infections due to the unique clone identified in this cluster have been detected.
Conclusions:
Despite adhering to HCD cleaning and disinfection strategies beyond manufacturer instructions for use, HCDs became colonized with and ultimately transmitted M. abscessus to 3 patients. Design modifications to better contain aerosols or filter exhaust during device operation are needed to prevent NTM transmission events from water-based HCDs.
Given the current state of play in the search for life beyond the Earth, where as yet we have no conclusive evidence, it might seem inappropriate to discuss ‘common misunderstandings’. But it’s not. There can be misunderstandings about the way we search for extraterrestrial life, as well as in relation to the scientific basis for our search, and it is these that I focus on here, rather than misunderstandings about extraterrestrial life itself. I discuss them below in the order in which they’re first encountered in the book.
I introduced exoplanets – planets beyond our solar system – in Chapter 1, discussed them in the context of planetary systems in Chapter 2, and considered them in relation to the concept of habitability from a general perspective in Chapter 4. But so far I’ve given little detail about them. How many exoplanets, or exoplanetary systems, have I mentioned so far? Very few. That’s about to change, but not in the sense of replacing a dearth of detail with a wealth of it. Rather, I’ll be very selective about the particular exoplanets I discuss. This is essential, given that the number now known is huge, and most of them are irrelevant to the search for alien life.
This is where we switch from the geography of alien life to its biology – in other words from its distribution across the observable universe to its ‘nature’ in many senses of that word, including its chemical composition, its physical form, its means of acquiring energy, and, in some cases, its intelligence. For me, the nature of life beyond Earth is even more interesting than exactly which planetary bodies it inhabits, and many other scientists feel likewise. However, in moving from geography to biology things also become more controversial, because the so-called ‘sample size of one’ problem comes into sharp focus.
While we wait for our first conclusive evidence of life beyond Earth, we can contemplate its possible nature. In particular, we can ask the following question. To what extent should we expect evolution elsewhere to take a similar course to the one it has taken on Earth? That could be described as the key question about the biology, as opposed to the geography, of extraterrestrial life. But the way I’ve just put it isn’t ideal – it’s too centred on our home planet as a reference point. Let’s try to rephrase it in a Copernican manner, so that Earth doesn’t occupy a special place. Here’s one such rephrased version. To what extent does evolution follow similar courses on different inhabited planets? Earth is implicit here, but just as one of many inhabited planets, and almost certainly not the first one.
To look for life in the universe beyond Earth, we need to understand what is meant by ‘universe’, just as we need to understand what is meant by ‘life’. In the end, we can probably ignore most of the universe and focus our search in some very specific places. However, those places are best understood against a backcloth of what can be called – it’s an understatement really – the big picture.
The thought of there being millions of planets with life in the observable universe is inspirational. But it’s only that – a thought. Or perhaps a bit more than that – a thought with probability on its side. But the gap between probability and certainty is a huge one. We won’t really feel the presence of extraterrestrial life until we know for sure that it’s there. So we need evidence. I started the book with a look at a paper that focused on the need for a cool assessment of evidence and the importance of not jumping to conclusions. In this chapter we’ll return to that issue.
With the exception of planets orbiting the most massive and luminous stars, planetary lifespans are measured in billions of years. Evolution on Earth has taken about four billion years so far, and probably has about another two or three billion to run, depending on when our ever-brightening Sun eventually boils away all our surface water. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it’s probably a good idea to assume that evolution elsewhere takes billions of years too. It’s hard to imagine an evolutionary process in which intelligence is an early result rather than a late one. So, to look for intelligent alien life, we need to concentrate on planets that aren’t too young. Earlier, I suggested that good yardsticks for planetary age when looking for photosynthetic or intelligent life were at least two and four billion years, respectively. In general, we can imagine at least four stages in the life of a planet – no life at all, chemosynthetic life only, a stage characterized by a mixture of forms of energy acquisition including photosynthetic life, and a final stage that also includes intelligent life. In the present chapter, we’re concerned with the final one.
For many millennia, humans have gazed up in wonder at the night-time sky. The full panoply of the Milky Way is an awesome sight. The scale of space is immense. Is there life out there somewhere? If so, where, and what form does it take? In the space of a couple of sentences, we’ve already gone from generalized wonder to specific questions. The next step is from questions to hypotheses, or, in other words, proposed answers. Here are two such hypotheses that I’ll flesh out as the book progresses: first, life exists on trillions of planets in the universe; second, it usually follows evolutionary pathways that are broadly similar to – though different in detail from – those taken on Earth.
I started the book by considering the possibility that our generation may be the one to discover the first persuasive evidence of extraterrestrial life. Suppose this turns out to be true, and humanity’s first such evidence arrives in a decade or so. What would the possible impacts be? We can deal with them under four headings: scientific, social, religious, and philosophical, with all of these being defined very broadly.