Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:22:00.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Scoping Review of Physical Rehabilitation in Long-Term Care: Interventions, Outcomes, Tools*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2017

Caitlin McArthur*
Affiliation:
Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo
Jenna C. Gibbs
Affiliation:
Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo
Ruchit Patel
Affiliation:
Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo
Alexandra Papaioannou
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, McMaster University
Paula Neves
Affiliation:
Extendicare Canada, Ontario
Jaimie Killingbeck
Affiliation:
Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo
John Hirdes
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo
James Milligan
Affiliation:
Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo The Centre for Family Medicine, Kitchener Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University
Katherine Berg
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto
Lora Giangregorio
Affiliation:
Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo Toronto Rehabilitation Institute − University Health Network
*
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be sent to / La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adresées à : Caitlin McArthur, MScPT University of Waterloo 200 University Avenue West Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 <cmcarthu@uwaterloo.ca>

Abstract

Residents in long-term care (LTC) often require physical rehabilitation (PR) to maintain/improve physical function. This scoping review described the breadth of literature regarding PR in LTC to date, synthesizing PR interventions that have been evaluated, outcomes used, and tools for determining service eligibility. A structured search, conducted in six licensed databases and grey literature, identified 381 articles for inclusion. Most interventions were delivered and evaluated at the resident level and typically were multicomponent exercise programs. Performance-based measures, activities of daily living, and mood were the most frequently reported outcomes. A key knowledge gap was PR in relation to goals, such as quality of life. Future studies should reflect medically complex residents who live in LTC, and length of residents’ stay should be differentiated. Intervention studies should also explore realistic delivery methods; moreover, tool development for determining service eligibility is necessary to ensure equality in rehabilitative care across the LTC sector.

Résumé

Les résidents en soins de longue durée (SLD) ont souvent besoin de soins en réadaptation pour maintenir ou améliorer leur état physique fonctionnel. L’objectif de cet examen de portée était de décrire l’envergure des publications concernant la réadaptation physique en SLD jusqu’à ce jour, avec une emphase sur les types d’interventions en réadaptation qui ont été évaluées, ainsi que sur les mesures de résultats utilisées et les outils déterminant l’admissibilité au service. Une recherche structurée a été réalisée dans six bases de données sous licence et dans la littérature grise. Deux analystes ont identifié 381 articles qui ont été triés en utilisant un formulaire qui avait préalablement été testé dans un essai pilote, et les données de ces articles ont été extraites. La plupart des interventions avaient été réalisées et évaluées au niveau des résidents, et consistaient fréquemment en des programmes d’exercices à plusieurs composantes dispensés par du personnel de recherche et des physiothérapeutes. Les mesures les plus couramment rapportées étaient basées sur la performance, les activités de la vie quotidienne et l’humeur. Une lacune importante a été identifiée concernant les connaissances sur la réadaptation en lien avec des objectifs qui soient pertinents pour les résidents, tels que la qualité de vie. Dans les études à venir, il serait important que les caractéristiques des résidents en SLD soit représentatives de la complexité de l’état de santé de cette population; la durée de leur séjour devrait aussi être incluse et différenciée. Les études d’intervention devraient aussi explorer des méthodes de prestation de soins qui soient réalistes et soutenables. Le développement d’outils pour favoriser une meilleure détermination de l’admissibilité aux services est aussi nécessaire pour assurer l’égalité en matière de soins en réadaptation dans l’ensemble du secteur des SLD.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work was funded by a grant from Technology Evaluation in the Elderly Network, grant number KS2014-08. The authors thank Rebecca Hutchinson and Jackie Stapleton, liaison librarians at the University of Waterloo, for assistance with the database search strategy. We also thank Rebecca Clark for her assistance with data collection and analysis. We gratefully acknowledge the opportunity to collaborate with Michael Sharratt and others from the Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging on this project.

References

Akishita, M., Ishii, S., Kojima, T., Kozaki, K., Kuzuya, M., Arai, H., … Toba, K. (2013). Priorities of health care outcomes for the elderly. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14(7), 479484.Google Scholar
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, K., Sherwood, S., Murphy, K., Carpenter, I. G., Gilgen, R., & Phillips, C. D. (1997). Rehabilitation in nursing homes: A cross-national comparison of recipients. Age and Ageing, 26(Suppl. 2), 3742.Google Scholar
Boström, A. M., Slaughter, S. E., Chojecki, D., & Estabrooks, C. A. (2012). What do we know about knowledge translation in the care of older adults? A scoping review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 13(3), 210219.Google Scholar
Brazil, K., Maitland, J., Ploeg, J., & Denton, M. (2012). Identifying research priorities in long term care homes. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 13(1), 84–e1–84-e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.04.018 Google Scholar
Canadian Institute of Health Information. (2013). When a nursing home is home: How do Canadian nursing homes measure up on quality? Retrieved from https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/CCRS_QualityinLongTermCare_EN.pdf Google Scholar
Canadian Physiotherapy Association. (2012). Description of physiotherapy in Canada. Retrieved from http://www.physiotherapy.ca/getmedia/e3f53048-d8e0-416b-9c9d-38277c0e6643/DoPEN(final).pdf.aspx Google Scholar
Crocker, T., Forster, A., Young, J., Brown, L., Ozer, S., Smith, J., … Greenwood, D.C. (2013). Physical rehabilitation for older people in long-term care. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD004294. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004294.pub3 Google Scholar
De Boer, M. E., Leemrijse, C. J., Van Den Ende, C. H. M., Ribbe, M. W., & Dekker, J. (2007). The availability of allied health care in nursing homes. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(8), 665670.Google Scholar
de Souto Barreto, P., Morley, J. E., Chodzko-Zajko, W., H Pitkala, K., Weening-Djiksterhuis, E., Rodriguez-Manas, L., … International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics − Global Aging Research Network (IAGG-GARN) and the IAGG European Region Clinical Section. (2016). Recommendations on physical activity and exercise for older adults living in long-term care facilities: A taskforce report. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 17(5), 381392. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.01.021.Google Scholar
Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care: Part 2. The Millbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 11, 166206.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. M., Thomas, R. E., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C. R., Vale, L., … Donaldson, C. (2004). Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment, 8(6), iii-72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Health Canada. (2004). Long-term facilities-based care. Retrieved from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/home-domicile/longdur/index-eng.php Google Scholar
Health Quality Ontario. (2016). Long-term care public reporting website technical report table. Retrieved from http://www.hqontario.ca/System-Performance/Long-Term-Care-Sector-Performance/Quality-Indicators Google Scholar
Hirdes, J. P., Mitchell, L., Maxwell, C. J., & White, N. (2011). Beyond the ‘iron lungs of gerontology’: Using evidence to shape the future of nursing homes in Canada. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30(3), 371390.Google Scholar
Katz, P. R. (2011). An international perspective on long term care: Focus on nursing homes. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 12(7), 487492.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.01.017 Google Scholar
Kochersberger, G., Hielema, F., & Westlund, R. (1994). Rehabilitation in the nursing home: How much, why, and with what results. Public Health Reports, 109(3), 372376.Google Scholar
Leemrijse, C. J., De Boer, M. E., Van Den Ende, C. H. M., Ribbe, M.W., & Dekker, J. (2007). Factors associated with physiotherapy provision in a population of elderly nursing home residents; a cross sectional study. BMC Geriatrics, 7(1), 7.Google Scholar
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McArthur, C., Hirdes, J., Berg, K., & Giangregorio, L. (2015). Who receives rehabilitation in Canadian long-term care facilities? A cross-sectional study. Physiotherapy Canada, 67(2), 113121. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2014-27 Google Scholar
McArthur, C., Gibbs, J., Papaioannou, A., Hirdes, J., Milligan, J., Berg, K., & Giangregorio, L. (2015). Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: Protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators. BMJ Open, 5(6), e007528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007528 Google Scholar
McGilton, K. S. (2015). Clinician’s commentary on McArthur et al. (1). Physiotherapy Canada, 67(2), 122123. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2014-27-CC Google Scholar
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. (2012). Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Norton, P. G., Murray, M., Doupe, M.B., Cummings, G. G., Poss, J. W., Squires, J. E., … Estabrooks, C.A. (2014). Facility versus unit level reporting of quality indicators in nursing homes when performance monitoring is the goal. BMJ Open, 4(2), e004488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004488 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. (2007). Policy for the operation of short-stay beds under the long-term care homes act. (Policy). Toronto, ON: Author.Google Scholar
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care. (2013). Frequently asked questions for physiotherapists. Retrieved from http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/physio/physio_pro_doctors_nurses.aspx Google Scholar
Szczepura, A., Nelson, S., & Wild, D. (2008). In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes: Uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness. BMC Health Services Research, 8, 269. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-269 Google Scholar
Theodos, P. (2004). Fall prevention in frail elderly nursing home residents: A challenge to case management: Part II. Lippincott’s Case Management : Managing the Process of Patient Care, 9(1), 3244. doi: 00129234-200401000-00007 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westby, M. D., Klemm, A., Li, L. C., & Jones, C. A. (2016). Emerging role of quality indicators in physical therapist practice and health service delivery. Physical Therapy, 96(1), 90100. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150106 Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2016). WHO definition of palliative care. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/ Google Scholar
Young, S. (2004). Rehabilitation: More than activities of daily living. Nursing Older People, 16(8), 2224. doi: 10.7748/nop2004.11.16.8.22.c2341 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

McArthur et al supplementary material

McArthur et al supplementary material 1

Download McArthur et al supplementary material(File)
File 17.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

McArthur et al supplementary material

McArthur et al supplementary material 2

Download McArthur et al supplementary material(File)
File 18.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

McArthur et al supplementary material

McArthur et al supplementary material 3

Download McArthur et al supplementary material(File)
File 45.7 KB