No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Political homophobia as a tool of creating crisis narratives and ontological insecurities in illiberal populist contexts: lessons from the 2023 elections in Turkey
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2024
Abstract
This article analyzes how the Justice and Development Party’s (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi; AKP) 2023 election propaganda utilized political homophobia as a populist tool to construct and reinforce political antagonisms and carry out a crisis-driven politics in search of continued hegemony. Relying on critical discourse analysis of qualitative data, it demonstrates that during the 2023 election period the AKP’s antagonistic operationalization of anti-LGBTI+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex) discourse unfolded in three modalities: as a culturalist rhetoric and a nativist technology of othering at the intersection of Islam and anti-genderism; as a tool of defining and vilifying political opponents as “inner enemies”; and as a policy perspective and path towards legal action and institutionalization of political homophobia. Within this frame, the article demonstrates that the gendered performance of crisis-driven politics is a core mechanism of the current democratic erosion in Turkey. It argues that homophobic propaganda is a key tool for the AKP not only to enact the processes of othering through fearmongering and scapegoating, but also to restructure politics through crisis-driven imaginaries, post-truth epistemologies, and emergency legislation that lacks political responsiveness.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of New Perspectives on Turkey
References
Abji, S, Korteweg, A and Williams, L (2019) Culture talk and the politics of the new right: navigating gendered racism in attempts to address violence against women in immigrant communities. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 44(3), 797–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adak, S (2023) Grassroots familialism? NGO mobilization and neoconservatism in contemporary Turkey. European Journal of Turkish Studies. Social Sciences on Contemporary Turkey. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejts.7644
Google Scholar
Agius, C, Bergman, RA and Kinnvall, C (2020) Populism, ontological insecurity and gendered nationalism: masculinity, climate denial and Covid-19. Politics, Religion & Ideology 21(4), 432–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkan, B (2018) The politics of care in Turkey: Sacred familialism in a changing political context. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 25(1): 72–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altan-Olcay, Ö and Oder, BE (2021) Why Turkey’s withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention is a global problem. Open Democracy, 2 June 2021. Available at https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/why-turkeys-withdrawal-from-the-istanbul-convention-is-a-global-problem/ (accessed 19 February 2024).Google Scholar
Altay, T (2022) The pink line across digital publics: political homophobia and the queer strategies of everyday life during COVID-19 in Turkey. European Journal of Women’s Studies 29(1S), 60S–74S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arat, Y (2022) Democratic backsliding and the instrumentalization of women’s rights in Turkey. Politics & Gender 18(4), 911–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arat, ZFK and Nuňez, C (2017) Advancing LGBT rights in Turkey: tolerance or protection? Human Rights Review 18(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arti Gercek (2020) “Erdogan'dan CHP'ye: Cocuk Tacizcilerinin Arkasinda Duran Bunlar Degil mi?” 3 December. Available at https://artigercek.com/guncel/erdogan-bizim-toplumumuz-aile-erkildir-145483h.Google Scholar
Balta, E, Kaltwasser, CR and Yagci, AH (2022) Populist attitudes and conspiratorial thinking. Party Politics 28(4), 625–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC (2023) Erdoğan: bu milletin aile kurumu sağlamdır, bu milletten LGBT’ci çıkmaz. BBC, 29 April 2023. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/articles/cd1rylgypz2o (accessed 19 February 2024).Google Scholar
Bianet (2022) Erdoğan: “LGBT denilen olay bizim kitabımızda yok”. Bianet, 20 December 2022. https://m.bianet.org/bianet/dunya/271687-erdogan-lgbt-denilen-olay-bizim-kitabimizda-yok (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Bianet (2023) Cumhurbaşkanlığı seçimlerinde LGBTI+ları en çok hedef gösteren Erdoğan oldu. Bianet, 30 October 2023. https://bianet.org/haber/cumhurbaskanligi-secimlerinde-lgbti-lari-en-cok-hedef-gosteren-erdogan-oldu-287175 (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Bonikowski, B, Halikiopoulou, D, Kaufmann, E and Rooduijn, M (2019) Populism and nationalism in a comparative perspective: a scholarly exchange. Nations and Nationalism 25(1), 58–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosia, MJ and Weiss, ML (2013) Political homophobia in comparative perspective. In Weiss, ML and Bosia, MJ (eds), Global Homophobia: States, Movements, and the Politics of Oppression. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1–29.Google Scholar
Buzan, B, Wæver, O and Wilde, JD (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Çınar, M (2018) From moderation to de-moderation: democratic backsliding of the AKP in Turkey. In Esposito, J, Rahim, LZ and Ghobadzadeh, N (eds), The Politics of Islamism. Gewerbestrasse, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 127–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cindoglu, D and Unal, D (2017) Gender and sexuality in the authoritarian discursive strategies of “New Turkey”. European Journal of Women’s Studies 24(1), 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coşar, S (2007) Women in Turkish political thought: between tradition and modernity. Feminist Review 86(1), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Destradi, S, Cadier, D and Plagemann, J (2021) Populism and foreign policy: a research agenda (Introduction). Comparative European Politics 19(6), 663–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietze, G and Roth, J (eds) (2020) Right-Wing Populism and Gender: European Perspectives and Beyond. Berlin: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
Diken (2022a) AKP’nin Anayasa teklifinin gerekçesi: çürüme ve sapkınlığa karşı tedbir almak. Diken, 9 December 2022. https://www.diken.com.tr/akpnin-anayasa-teklifinin-gerekcesi-curume-ve-sapkinliga-karsi-tedbir-almak/ (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Diken (2022b) Soylu yine “sevgi dolu”: Sizin gibi LGBT çocuğu değiliz, Ayetel Kürsilerin çocuğuyuz. Diken, 29 August 2022. https://www.diken.com.tr/soylu-yine-sevgi-dolu-biz-sizin-gibi-lgbt-cocugu-degiliz-biz-ayetel-kursilerin-cocuguyuz/ (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Diken (2023) İktidar LGBTI+ derneklerini kapatmaya hazırlanıyor. Diken, 23 June 2023. https://www.diken.com.tr/iktidar-lgbti-derneklerini-kapatmaya-hazirlaniyor/ (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Dönmez, RÖ and Özmen, FA (eds) (2013) Gendered Identities: Criticizing Patriarchy in Turkey. Plymouth, NY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Edenborg, E (2023) Anti-gender politics as discourse coalitions: Russia’s domestic and international promotion of “traditional values”. Problems of Post-Communism 70(2), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eksi, B and Wood, EA (2019) Right-wing populism as gendered performance: Janus-faced masculinity in the leadership of Vladimir Putin and Recep T. Erdogan. Theory and Society 48(5), 733–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engin, C (2015) LGBT in Turkey: policies and experiences. Social Sciences 4(3), 838–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdoğan, R. T. (@RTErdoğan) (2011) Twitter, 3 June 2011. https://twitter.com/RTErdoğan/status/76645089455247361?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw.Google Scholar
Esen, B and Gumuscu, S (2023) How Erdoğan’s populism won again. Journal of Democracy 34(3), 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France24 (2020) Erdogan defends Turkey’s religious chief’s anti-gay sermon. France24, 27 April 2020. https://www.france24.com/en/20200427-erdogan-defends-turkey-religious-chief-s-anti-gay-sermon (accessed 19 February 2024).Google Scholar
Gazete Duvar English (2020) Turkey’s top religious official targets LGBT individuals. Gazete Duvar English, 25 April 2020. https://www.duvarenglish.com/domestic/2020/04/25/turkeys-top-religious-official-once-again-targets-lgbt-individuals (accessed 19 February 2024).Google Scholar
Gazete Duvar English (2023a) AKP plans to shut down LGBTI+ associations in Turkey with a constitutional amendment. Gazete Duvar English, 23 June 2023. https://www.duvarenglish.com/akp-plans-to-shut-down-lgbti-associations-in-turkey-with-constitutional-amendment-proposal-news-62619 (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Gazete Duvar English (2023b) Erdogan and Soylu attack LGBTI+ community during election campaigns. Gazete Duvar English, 22 April 2023. https://www.duvarenglish.com/erdogan-and-soylu-attack-lgbti-community-during-election-campaigns-news-62262#:∼:text=Duvar%20English,against%20our%20sacred%20family%20structure.%E2%80%9D (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Gera, M (2023) Here, the Hungarian people will decide how to raise our children: populist rhetoric and social categorization in Viktor Orbán’s anti-LGBTQ campaign in Hungary. New Perspectives 31(2), 104–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graff, A, Kapur, R and Walters, SD (2019) Introduction: gender and the rise of the global right. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 44(3), 541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graff, A and Korolczuk, E (2022) Anti-Gender Politics in the Populist Moment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hajer, MA (1993) Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Great Britain. In Fischer, F and Forester, J (eds), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hameleers, M, Bos, L and De Vreese, C (2017) “They did it”: the effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research 44(6), 870–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harteveld, E, Mendoza, P and Rooduijn, M (2022) Affective polarization and the populist radical right: creating the hating? Government and Opposition 57(4), 703–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homolar, A and Scholz, R (2019) The power of Trump-speak: populist crisis narratives and ontological security. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32(3), 344–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hürriyet Daily News (2022) CHP submits draft law on use of headscarf in public sphere. Hürriyet Daily News, 5 October 2022. https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/chp-submits-draft-law-for-freedom-of-dressing-including-headscarf-in-public-duty-177468 (accessed 19 February 2024).Google Scholar
Ilga (2023) Annual review of the human rights situation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and intersex people in Turkey. Rainbow Europe. https://www.rainbow-europe.org/#8664/0/0 (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Kandiyoti, D (2016) Locating the politics of gender: patriarchy, neo-liberal governance and violence in Turkey. Research and Policy on Turkey 1(2), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaos, GL (2023) Erdoğan’ın 11 günü: 14 şehir ve 2 yayında LGBTİ+’ları hedef aldı. Kaos GL, 12 May 2023. https://kaosgl.org/haber/erdogan-in-11-gunu-14-sehir-ve-2-yayinda-lgbti-lari-hedef-aldi (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Kinnvall, C (2004) Globalization and religious nationalism: self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Political Psychology 25(5), 741–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnvall, C (2018) Ontological insecurities and postcolonial imaginaries: the emotional appeal of populism. Humanity & Society 42(4), 523–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnvall, C and Svensson, T (2022) Exploring the populist “mind”: anxiety, fantasy, and everyday populism. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 24(3), 526–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korkut, U and Eslen-Ziya, H (2016) The discursive governance of population politics: the evolution of a pro-birth regime in Turkey. Social Politics 23(4), 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korolczuk, E and Graff, A (2018) Gender as “Ebola from Brussels”: the anticolonial frame and the rise of illiberal populism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 43(4), 797–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhar, R and Paternotte, D (eds) (2017) Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Laclau, E (1996) The death and resurrection of the theory of ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies 1(3), 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, S and Sauer, B (2017) “Gender ideology” in Austria: coalitions around an empty signifier. In Kuhar, R and Paternotte, D (eds), Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 23–40.Google Scholar
McCoy, J and Somer, M (2019) Toward a theory of pernicious polarization and how it harms democracies: comparative evidence and possible remedies. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681(1), 234–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzen, J (2006) Ontological security in world politics: state identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations 12(3), 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, B (2015) How to perform crisis: a model for understanding the key role of crisis in contemporary populism. Government and Opposition 50(2), 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, B (2016) The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Moss, K (2017) Russia as the saviour of European civilization: Gender and the geopolitics of traditional values. In Kuhar, R and Paternotte, D (eds), Anti-gender campaigns in Europe. Mobilizations against equality. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 195–214.Google Scholar
Mudde, C (2004) The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39(4), 541–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C and Kaltwasser, CR (2017) Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muedini, F (2021) AKP attitudes towards the LGBTI community in Turkey. In Aydin, H and Langley, W (eds), Human Rights in Turkey: Assaults on Human Dignity. Cham: Springer, 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nai, A (2021) Fear and loathing in populist campaigns? Comparing the communication style of populists and non-populists in elections worldwide. Journal of Political Marketing 20(2), 219–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuñez-Mietz, C and Fernando, G (2019) Resisting human rights through securitization: Russia and Hungary against LGBT rights. Journal of Human Rights 18(5), 543–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozbay, C (2022) Living like a hetero: southern homonormativity in Istanbul. Sexualities 25(8), 1058–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özbay, C and Öktem, K (2021) Turkey’s queer times. New Perspectives on Turkey 64, 117–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özbay, C and Soybakis, O (2020) Political masculinities: gender, power, and change in Turkey. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 27(1), 27–50.Google Scholar
Reicher, S, Alexander Haslam, S and Rath, R (2008) Making a virtue of evil: a five-step social identity model of the development of collective hate. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2(3), 1313–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, M and Wodak, R (2009) The discourse–historical approach. In Wodak, R and Meyer, M (eds), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd rev. ed. London: SAGE, 87–121.Google Scholar
Rhinard, M (2019) The crisisification of policy-making in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 57(3), 616–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şahin, O (2021) How populists securitize elections to win them: the 2015 double elections in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey 64, 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakki, I and Pettersson, K (2016) Discursive constructions of otherness in populist radical right political blogs. European Journal of Social Psychology 46(2), 156–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savcı, E (2021) Queer in Translation: Sexual Politics under Neoliberal Islam. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Slootmaeckers, K (2019) Nationalism as competing masculinities: homophobia as a technology of othering for hetero-and homonationalism. Theory and Society 48(2), 239–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperling, V (2016) Putin’s macho personality cult. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 49(1), 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stella, F and Nartova, N (2015) Sexual citizenship, nationalism and biopolitics in Putin’s Russia. In Stella, F, Taylor, Y, Reynolds, T and Rogers, A (eds), Sexuality, Citizenship and Belonging: Trans-National and Intersectional Perspectives. London: Routledge, 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchland, J (2018) The LGBT specter in Russia: refusing queerness, claiming “whiteness”. Gender, Place & Culture 25(7), 1073–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
T24 (2023) Erdoğan İzmir’de muhalefeti hedef aldı: Çapsızların son çırpınışlarıdır. T24, 29 April 2023. https://t24.com.tr/haber/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-izmir-mitinginde-konusuyor,1106961 (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
TCCB (2023a) A Haber Ortak Yayını “Başkan Erdoğan ile Gündem Özel”. TCCB, 29 March 2023. https://www.tccb.gov.tr/mulakatlar/1709/145507/a-haber-ortak-yayini-baskan-erdogan-ile-gundem-ozel- (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
TCCB (2023b) “Her hal ve şart altında meclisin temsil ettiği milli iradenin üstünlüğüne sahip çıktık”. TCCB, 1 February 2023. https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/142701/-her-h-l-ve-sart-altinda-meclisin-temsil-ettigi-mill-iradenin-ustunlugu-ilkesine-sahip-ciktik- (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Tepe, S and Alemdaroğlu, A (2021) How authoritarians win when they lose. Journal of Democracy 32(4), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teyit (2023) 2023 Seçimlerinin çeliskili tartışması: Millet İttifakı ve LGBTİ+’lar. Teyit, 5 May 2023. https://teyit.org/dosya/2023-secimlerinin-celiskili-tartismasi-millet-ittifaki-ve-lgbtilar (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Ugur-Cinar, M (2023) Elections and democracy in Turkey: reconsidering competitive authoritarianism in the age of democratic backsliding. Political Quarterly 94(3), 445–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unal, D (2021) The masculinist restoration project in the rhetoric of anti-gender movements. In Hakola, O, Salminen, J, Turpeinen, J and Winberg, O (eds), The Culture and Politics of Populist Masculinities. London: Lexington Books, 67–89.Google Scholar
Unal, D (2022) “Are you God? Damn your family!”: the Islam–gender nexus in right-wing populism and the new generation of Muslim feminist activism in Turkey. Religions 13(4), 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unal, D (2023a) Crackdown on pride walks in Turkey: homophobia and the 2023 elections. The Loop: ECPR Political Science Blog. https://theloop.ecpr.eu/crackdown-on-pride-walks-in-turkey-implications-of-homophobia-on-2023-elections/ (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Unal, D (2023b) Securitization of gender as a modus operandi of populism: anti-gender discourses on the Istanbul Convention in the context of AKP’s illiberal transformation. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2023.2262227
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unal, D (2024) The variety of anti-gender alliances and democratic backsliding in Turkey: fault lines around opposition to “gender ideology” and their political implications. International Feminist Journal of Politics 26(1), 6–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ünan, AD (2015) Gezi protests and the LGBT rights movement: a relation in motion. In Yalcintas, A (ed.), Creativity and Humour in Occupy Movements: Intellectual Disobedience in Turkey and Beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 75–94.Google Scholar
Verkuyten, M (2013) Justifying discrimination of Muslim immigrants: outgroup ideology and the five-step social identity model. British Journal of Social Psychology 52, 345–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waisbord, S (2018) The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics. Communication Research and Practice 4(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widmann, T (2021) How emotional are populists really? Factors explaining emotional appeals in the communication of political parties. Political Psychology 42(1), 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R (2015) The Politics of Fear. What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R and Nugara, S (2017) Right-wing populist parties endorse what can be recognised as the “arrogance of ignorance”: entretien de Ruth Wodak avec Silvia Nugara. Mots. Les langages du politique 115(3), 165–173.Google Scholar
Wojczewski, T (2020) Enemies of the people: populism and the politics (in)security. European Journal of International Security 5(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yavuz, MH (2023) A torn country: Erdoğan’s Turkey and the elections of 2023. Middle East Policy 30(3), 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şafak, Yeni (2023a) Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan’dan “aile” mesajı: Küresel planları bozmak için elimizden geleni yapacağız. Yeni Şafak, 21 September 2023. https://www.yenisafak.com/gundem/cumhurbaskani-erdogandan-aile-mesaji-kuresel-planlari-bozmak-icin-elimizden-geleni-yapacagiz-4562026 (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Şafak, Yeni (2023b) Karamollaoğlu’ndan CHP’yi ayaklandıracak LGBT çıkışı: İki erkek iki kadın bir araya gelmiş “biz aileyiz” diyor haydi oradan. Yeni Şafak, 26 March 2023. https://www.yenisafak.com/gundem/karamollaoglundan-chpyi-ayaklandiracak-lgbt-cikisi-iki-erkek-iki-kadin-bir-araya-gelmis-biz-aileyiz-diyor-haydi-oradan-4518403 (accessed 20 February 2024).Google Scholar
Yilmaz, I, Shipoli, E and Demir, M (2023) Securitization and Authoritarianism: The AKP’s Oppression of Dissident Groups in Turkey. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ylä-Anttila, T (2018) Populist knowledge: “post-truth” repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 5(4), 356–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuk, P and Zuk, P (2019) Dangerous liaisons between the catholic church and state: the religious and political alliance of the nationalist right with the conservative church in Poland. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 27(2–3), 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar